Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

May 14, 2024

New York Stock Exchange US Industrials Machinery conference_presentation 33 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#1

All right. Well, thanks for joining us. We're going to continue and actually conclude the first day of our 17th Annual JPMorgan Homebuilding and Building Products Conference. Saving the best for last, of course, with Stanley Black & Decker. Really happy to have with us CFO Pat Hallinan as well as VP of IR Dennis Lange. Again, my name is Mike Rehaut. I cover the builders and building product names for JPMorgan. This presentation will be a fireside chat, but we will have time at the end for Q&A.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#2

So again, thanks, Pat, Dennis and team, for joining us today. I'm going to kick it off just with first question kind of around earnings power, kind of a little bigger picture. Your '24 guidance, EPS of $3.50 to $4.50, it includes about a 30% average gross margin. 2025 expected maybe to get on average to perhaps 32%, 33%. Not putting words in your mouth, but just kind of doing the math, on the way to 35%. There could be potentially some increase in growth investments. I'd love to hear your thoughts on that. But how do you think about earnings power over the next 2 or 3 years? And maybe within that context, Tools & Storage margins as well.

Patrick Hallinan

executive
#3

Okay. I think when I got here a little more than a year ago, I was already up against '24 guidance -- or '23 guidance that Don had given, right?

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#4

'24.

Patrick Hallinan

executive
#5

But I think it's a fair question. The macro and the deflation has been more of a headwind than we expected when we started on this transformation journey. But we have every confidence we're on the right path. And so as we think through the next 2 years, I certainly think assuming there's not a recession and assuming there's not some big inflationary shock that's outlandish, could our OM margins be double digits in '25 and beyond -- beyond the 10% or 11% in '26 is something -- is very much within the realm of possibility and certainly something we're trying to achieve. I think what people -- what you're getting at is, are you going to invest away your margin expansion? And I think the reality is we want to and will invest in innovation and brand building. But about the pace at which we can really make that productive on an annual basis is in that, call it, $70 million to $100 million a year. So I think -- could we go a little bit beyond $100 million? Perhaps, but we're not going to be consuming all the margin expansion. So we're very confident in our gross margin path of finishing this year at 30%, which has the back half of this year at 31% average, of getting to 35% by the fourth quarter of next year, which that means we're going to be in the 32%, 33% range for the average of next year, and then having a measured amount of SG&A expansion but therefore taking our current OM margin, which is barely high single digits, and getting it into that 10% to 11% range and then potentially 11% to 12% beyond that. We definitely believe that this business can and should be in the longer term beyond the '26 horizon high teens or better EBITDA margin business. So in terms of Tools & Outdoor, I think that pretax operating margin can and should be mid-teens or better? Most definitely. I think it would be the kind of business that's going to be 35-plus percent, probably at least that range on gross margin and SG&A in the low 20s, if not 21-ish. So that's a framework I would give you. I think if there was a macro, I'm kind of giving you that under the assumption that '25 and '26 are, at best, low single-digit macro. And that inflation or deflation is something moderate in either direction.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#6

Okay. Thank you for that. Balance sheet leverage, I think, is another big area of concern. Maybe again, you could just kind of share with us your goals in terms of leverage and debt paydown over the next couple of years. And obviously, you've done a lot on the portfolio side to perhaps sell some assets, drive some additional cash, some additional debt paydown. So just how might that overlay as well when you think about the balance sheet?

Patrick Hallinan

executive
#7

Yes. Again, I'd start with the end in mind. I think probably at a time beyond '26, we're in that 2.5 net debt to EBITDA range. But I do think by the end of '26, we could be in the 2.5 to 3x, and probably by the end of this year, approaching 4x. I'd say that's mostly on the backs of we just closed our Infrastructure sale at the beginning of April, which was a little bit more than $700 million in net proceeds with debt paydown. And from there, that's mostly on the backs of organic cash generation. I think we will almost certainly do some very small and minor portfolio trimming within T&O when the M&A markets are appropriate for that, and we'll get a few businesses in a little bit better shape. I'd put that in the $0.5 billion or less range, which might then in '26, get you to the lower end of that range if the businesses are ready and the M&A markets are ready. I think there's been a lot of speculation on what we do within Industrial, which is a much bigger asset. And that -- the ranges and reference points I just gave had nothing to do with Industrial. I'd say we keep open-minded on that. That's a longer-cycle business that is recovering, especially we were mostly wide-body commercial aerospace. We've done a really nice job of getting more narrow-body and more defense in that business, and that aerospace business is recovering very nicely. And then it's our challenge. Is there enough synergies between these businesses? And are they similar enough that they should be together? But we're -- we'll always do what's right to generate the most value creation for our shareholders, but we're not in a rush in Industrial. And we feel like the overall balance sheet risk, while we fully acknowledge we have more work to do as we sit here today, and we're not really going to feel as comfortable as we'd like to fill until we're at 3 or below, we feel like we're on a good track with or without doing something with Industrial. That should be more of a strategic move.

Dennis Lange

executive
#8

And just to make sure that was clear, too, sub-3 is kind of exiting '25.

Patrick Hallinan

executive
#9

Yes.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#10

Correct. So '24 end around 4x, ending '25 that you hope to get to below 3.

Patrick Hallinan

executive
#11

Around 3, yes.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#12

Around 3. Okay.

Patrick Hallinan

executive
#13

Yes.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#14

Okay. One of the things mentioned on the recent earnings call was the outdoor business, having some encouraging U.S. retail POS data, maybe showing a little bit of an early start to the selling season versus last year. If that type of trend continues, what type of impact could that have on the Tools & Storage business in terms of revenues for the year?

Patrick Hallinan

executive
#15

Yes. I think -- I don't know if we're at a point where you -- one would want to predict that and then therefore change guidance. But I'd give like an order of magnitude. Our legacy handheld outdoor business is around $800 million in revenue. And the kind of current status, if you want to call it the year-end '23 status of the acquired business, is around $2.2 billion of revenue. So you got about a $3 billion business. And if the season kind of kept the shape of a seasonal curve that was traditional, could that be a couple of points of growth on that? That's not in our forecast. I think that's somewhere in the 1 to 3 points of that. That's very possible.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#16

On the $3 billion?

Patrick Hallinan

executive
#17

On the $3 billion.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#18

Right. Okay.

Patrick Hallinan

executive
#19

That's why I wanted to give you that. I don't know if that will be the case or not the case, but I certainly think that's possible. And I think if that were to occur, most of it would probably fall down. I mean I think at any given point in time, you can make some incremental investments, but we want to make incremental investments thoughtfully. And Chris Nelson has his team with a very specific game plan for this year. And while there's room to do a bit more, we don't just want to invest to invest. So I think there's a good chance that a good chunk of that would slow down.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#20

Right. Okay. Competitive environment, another big area of investor focus. On the last call, you talked about the competitive environment being stable, although -- and with the promotional environment kind of returning to historical levels. So how do you expect the backdrop to continue this year given that consumer DIY is still a little bit muted. How do you think things can progress in that type of scenario as it might continue?

Patrick Hallinan

executive
#21

Yes. I would echo what we said on the call. I'd say even through -- I would say the consumer demand became particularly soft, and this is -- obviously, most of last year was soft on the outdoor front. But kind of I'd say and broader tools kind of became soft in the middle of last year that I'd say retailers and manufacturers alike have been pretty disciplined. In large part, I think it's because it wasn't like they had a lot of traffic that was coming in and leaving with nothing. They had an absence of traffic. And so that steered them away from over-amplifying promotions. And that's still, I would say, the general experience. And I'm sure many people in this room took some time today to peek at Depot's earnings, and they're broadly in line with their guidance. And I would say, like much of the sector, a little bit softer on the top line, marginally than anybody would have liked. That's where I would say we were hoping that our demand would have been better in the first quarter but making it up on margin and expense management. And I think if the rest of the retailers and pro channels play out that way, I think they're going to end up staying disciplined this year. I think the competitive dynamics stay healthy. They stay focused on innovation, focused on brand building, focused on smart working capital reduction. Those are the things we're focused on, and we haven't seen any dynamic that suggests that's changing.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#22

Right. Okay. On the growth side, I mean, you did highlight in the first quarter that DEWALT did grow a little bit and maybe highlighting some of the drivers of that growth. I believe volume was down maybe 1% for Tools & Storage, if I remember right. So I'm assuming, correct me if I'm wrong, if there was some growth in the DEWALT, it wasn't that -- I would think probably in the low single-digit range if I can...

Patrick Hallinan

executive
#23

You're in the ZIP Code. You're in the ZIP code. And I would say that's even controlling where we had some placement gains where we had ship-ins, and that would be even controlling for that.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#24

Okay. So you talked about growth being driven by a combination of factors, higher fill rates, new products, customer engagement, highlighting the brand. How do you kind of segment out those factors in terms of contributing to growth? And how might those different factors drive growth going forward?

Patrick Hallinan

executive
#25

Yes. I would say those were things that were all helpful. They were all taking effect in the back half of last year. And while there were -- there was innovation shipment in there. We still have growth without innovation shipments in the mix. DEWALT's been a brand -- I think our whole portfolio has been so challenged that the strength of DEWALT hasn't got an opportunity to shine. And it's been a brand. It's maybe not in perfect health, but it's certainly in good health. And it's certainly been performing better than the market. Last year was a market where the whole market was probably down mid-single digits and DEWALT was just barely below 0 last year. And so what we want to keep doing as we pursue increasing organic growth is get DEWALT's performance amplified. It's been positive. It can be a lot more positive. And then in some of our more challenged brands, in particular, CRAFTSMAN and STANLEY, get them back to the brand health they should have. And I think that's why you don't see the strength of DEWALT when you have some other brands that are performing as well as they can and should. And Chris Nelson's team is focused equally on both as a new Chief Growth Officer who's working on taking DEWALT to higher highs and making some big turnarounds in CRAFTSMAN and STANLEY.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#26

Okay. No, that's helpful. I mean it kind of leads into my next question because certainly -- and the question I have now is -- kind of refers to that 2023 highlight where you said that DEWALT did kind of outpace the industry. But at the same time, maybe kind of take a step back and think about maybe holistically, your tools share, where it is today versus 3 or 5 years ago. And to the extent that there have been share changes in the industry, maybe some of the other shifts with other -- the other participants, how things might have played out. And how does that kind of then impact what you want to see or what you want to accomplish over the next 2 or 3 years?

Patrick Hallinan

executive
#27

Yes. And I'll touch on some of it. Dennis might be able to add a little bit more to the arc of 3 to 5 years that I underappreciate. Certainly, as you think of -- and I'm assuming because you're focused on this topic, mostly kind of the power tools chunk of the world. The DEWALT hasn't been the top grower, but it's been better than average in a category that's been pretty challenged from the early days of '22, probably the second quarter of '22 or thereabouts. And I think what has been helping DEWALT and one other brand you're probably thinking of in your head is, one, the pro has been disproportionately the share of wallet of power tool purchases, which has helped any pro-centric brands at the expense of some non-pro-centric brands, some that we own like CRAFTSMAN and some of that maybe somebody else owns. And then what we've seen is some of the European and Asian brands really kind of retrench and go back to their home ground because they've been having a hard time holding and gaining share in the U.S., especially post COVID as they retrenched on the expense side of things. And so I think the share gains that have been happening have been happening at the price points below the pro price points and at the expense of some European and Asian manufacturers. Can we and should we be getting more of that? Yes, and we will. But I think that's been -- those have been the recent dynamics. And I and the leadership team is focused on getting all of our brands to be growing anywhere from 100 to 200 plus basis points higher than the market. But I don't know if you would add anything on the kind of the longer arc of history.

Dennis Lange

executive
#28

No, I think you have it characterized right. One thing to keep in mind, too, is where some of the brands that you referenced earlier -- I mean, we didn't have a CRAFTSMAN power tool business 10 years ago as an example. So there are headways that we've made over this time period. There was obviously a big disruption period where it was noisy. It was harder to parse out share, market, et cetera. But we've come out with kind of what have Pat's describing it, and we have priorities right. And we feel like it's a big opportunity to be able to have more consistent and larger share gains in the business, which is what we're investing in.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#29

Right. So I mean on that, obviously, you continue to put out there an organic growth goal of 2 to 3x the market. And I don't know, I think you just kind of mentioned 100 to 200 basis points, but I don't know if it's part or...

Patrick Hallinan

executive
#30

Yes, I would say we kind of think of the market. Our market is kind of real GDP. If you're talking 2 to 3x that you're talking, the 4% to 6% range is kind of where you're talking. And I would tell you that in the very near term, given that the macro is still a little bit soft, we're probably on the lower end of that range in the next couple of years.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#31

Okay. That's helpful. That's kind of what I was hitting on. We talked about margins a little earlier during this conversation. But one of the questions just to be a little more explicit again, you kind of talked about the Tools & Storage margins. I mean just give some context, pre-pandemic, the prior like 15 years, the Tools & Storage segment averaged a 15% operating margin. It actually, from 2016 to '21, averaged 17%. So obviously, today, it's a different story. But how do you see the business over time? Can it get back to those types of mid-teen levels? And certainly, there were -- it would seem like there'd be a lot of heavy lifting. But what type of drivers would be needed to be put in place to get to that type of a range?

Patrick Hallinan

executive
#32

Yes. No, I think mid-teens for that segment. I don't think that would be there '25 or '26 per se, maybe '26. I think we're solidly on that track. Getting above the mid-teens, I think, is -- some of the period you referenced was particularly low metals deflation, '17. Kind of the late '17 to -- or '16 to early '18 were low metals deflation. And we did acquire an outdoors business that isn't as high margin. I don't think that prevents us from getting to the mid-teens. But I think we'd have to work the COGS there to a different place to get back to the high teens. But I would tell you that mid-teens pretax operating margin for that T&O business, again, not next year, maybe not even in '26, but that is definitely the pathway we are working towards.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#33

So that kind of hits me -- leads me to my last question that I have for this session, which is really around the outdoors business. And you kind of talked about just now maybe adjusting the cost structure. I know that's something that on the past earnings call, it was alluded to that you're actually potentially looking even right now at perhaps making some adjustments to the cost structure based on the current environment, and even longer term, maybe parts of the business being pruned. And from a sales perspective, as noted on the call that '24 is expected to be down potentially substantially versus '19. Even '25 could be a little bit below. So the question really here is, what's changed in this business relative to when you acquired it? Because you would think that at the time of acquisition, and you had been working with MTD for several years before that, certainly, it appears again that there are some real fundamental changes that occurred post acquisition. So maybe kind of walk through what those changes have been, maybe what you didn't expect or foresee at the time of acquisition in terms of the challenges that it currently faces.

Patrick Hallinan

executive
#34

Yes. First of all, I'd put a few things in broader context because we did talk about those points on the call. We did talk about them around outdoors. I'd say broadly because the macro has been softer '23, '24, '25 and because we haven't really seen meaningful deflation outside of ocean freight deflation. We've had to do more self-help to get the margin progression. So we still have a $2 billion target we talk about. It's still $1.5 billion COGS, $0.5 billion SG&A. But it's likely if the macro stays where it is, which is our most likely assumption, we're probably going to be having to push beyond $2 billion to get to the same margin percentage, and we're tracking towards that. We're not out with a new goal, and I don't mean to be announcing a new goal. I'm just -- that's the basic math of the lack of macro resources. And so part of that is fixed cost reduction. Some incremental footprint rationalization beyond what we would have anticipated 6 or 12 months ago, certainly even before the acquisition. And I think that will take place in outdoor. It will also take place in the broader tools business that we'll be pursuing much more footprint rationalization throughout this year and next year to drive the margins. And that's why we have confidence in the margins we're pursuing. I think specific to outdoors, I can't speak to all of the assumptions that went into the acquisition. I wasn't here then. But what I can tell you most definitely is the acquisition was predominantly predicated on taking our advanced battery technology and electrifying outdoor power equipment. I'd say the progress we're making in handheld, which is our legacy business, is even greater than the progress we've thought. And in walk behind, I'd say, it's probably at to slightly below. I think where the big gap to the acquisition case is anything that's ride-on, whether it's entry point ride-on all the way up to higher price point commercial, is probably going to convert slower than automobiles are converting for consumers, right? And that's the big delta. Then you're in a world where you're focused on competing with what I'll call a more legacy set of competitive dynamics, a bunch of gas-powered companies, of which, first of all, there's probably some excess capacity, and you got to fight with kind of global steel prices and a whole host of other dynamics. And so I think that's the reality. That conversion is going a lot slower than we would have thought at the time. And therefore, that forces us both in our cost structure, whether it's material or fixed cost structure or whether it's the segments of the market we're going to focus on and chase because we think we have products that are particularly strong like 0 turn versus entry price point ride-on. And so these are all the dynamics we're going to be managing to get that business to a better spot than it's in today and probably to even a better spot than it was when we acquired it but probably not the spot we thought it was going to be when you were thinking electrification.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#35

Right. That's helpful.

Patrick Hallinan

executive
#36

And we're going to manage our portfolio. Everything in our portfolio is going to have to be able to grow mid-market or above, and it's going to have to be trending towards an attractive organic ROIC. I mean we want to get -- it's going to take us some time to get our portfolio towards a 20-ish percent ROIC. But all the assets are going to have to be heading in that direction.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#37

Right. Perfect. That's all I have for me. I'll open it up to the audience. Yes.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#38

Two just -- is it first...

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#39

Can you use the mic actually since we're webcasting it?

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#40

Yes. Two questions. First one, just on the slower conversion on the outdoor piece on the electric side. Is that macro? It's a higher-priced product and people are slower to convert? Or is there something else creating a lag in the conversion versus the previous expectation?

Patrick Hallinan

executive
#41

It's a macro dynamic. I'd say handheld, the specialty handheld for consumer has been a very rapid and very successful and very high gross margin conversion proposition. I'd say for professionals broadly, whether it's handheld or ride-on. And then just for the consumer, the ride on price point proposition is just not as powerful as it probably needs to be to get them to make a different choice.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#42

And the second is just on power tools. How would you say your battery technology lines up from a competitive standpoint right now?

Patrick Hallinan

executive
#43

We're very comfortable. I mean we've been quite innovative in our battery technology, especially as it applies to higher power tools for the pro. And so we're very comfortable with our current position and where we're going with it.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#44

Yes.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#45

Just one quick question on R&D. I know in the past, there was sort of an emphasis on larger platforms and maybe -- I don't know how else to put it then, like bigger innovation versus sort of individual tools and sort of targeting markets. And I know there was one peer who maybe did pretty good in MAC. And I'm wondering, over the last couple of years, has there been a focus toward building out those product suites and maybe some of the pain points?

Dennis Lange

executive
#46

Yes. I think you're probably referring to kind of like core versus breakthrough innovation and the mix of those.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#47

Yes, yes, exactly.

Dennis Lange

executive
#48

Yes. And so I think we've had a lot of successes in both areas. And if you think about the legacy of DEWALT and also where its power is, it has technological leadership as you think about power, run time, perform and protect safety attributes and things along those lines. And it's got a long history of leading the industry up in these areas. Core innovation is also critically important because it helps you reset price, change price in the market. It helps drive brand health and news around your brands. And you need to have a mix of both. And I think if you think about the strategy here around what we're trying to accomplish, it's not that we want to shift one or the other. We need both and we need to be successful at both. And what you're hearing from us is more purpose, more prioritization and driving bigger impacts with what we do. And so as Chris Nelson has come on, organizationally as well as prioritization, it's been helping the innovation do that. And a good example of something that we want to do more broadly is what we launched earlier this year at the World of Concrete with POWERSHIFT. It's a suite of tools surrounding concrete application. It's going to power levels that have never been really hit before with the run time that we're delivering with those products, and it beats the incumbent technology. And so whenever you have those things come together in a way that works for the pro, you do see adoption in a quick manner because it is a technology that you usually trade up for in price, but if you get the performance along with it, we see people gravitate towards those types of solutions.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#49

Yes.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#50

Yes. Your dividend policy is pretty remarkable over the years. And if you had to keep your investment grade and you got to do a crunch like a recession came up, how do you think about the trade-off between the 2? And what levers might you pull to try to maintain both? You used to have to convert in the market a while ago. Would you perhaps accelerate disposition of a division? Or how would you deal with the crunch between those 2?

Patrick Hallinan

executive
#51

From a pure capital, how would you allocate capital to deal with that?

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#52

Yes, how do you maintain investment grade and still pay a dividend policy? How do you not jeopardize the dividend policy over a prolonged period...

Patrick Hallinan

executive
#53

Yes. Our bias is to preserve the dividend where it is, right? And so what we've been trying to do is position assets for sale at a pace that kind of gets ahead of the organic leverage threshold that we have there. I would tell you that our first priority would be to try to use the portfolio focus mechanism before we would go to the dividend. But we wouldn't want to lose investment grade. We'd be putting all the cards on the table to interrogate that before we would give away investment grade. That's for sure.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#54

Anything else? I think we've more or less reached the end of the time anyway. So thanks so much. Appreciate it, pat and Dennis and the whole Stanley team. And it's great to see the DEWALT stands in front of the building this morning. So that was extra fun. We're going to conclude the first day of our conference. Tomorrow, day 2, we have Masco, TopBuild followed by Taylor Morrison and LGI Homes, and rounding out the day, Smith Douglas and Forestar. So thanks again. Appreciate it, and we'll see you tomorrow.

Patrick Hallinan

executive
#55

thank you.

Dennis Lange

executive
#56

Thanks, Mike.

Patrick Hallinan

executive
#57

Thank you for having us on. We're celebrating DEWALT's 100th anniversary today. Very fitting way to cap the day.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#58

Of course. Thank you, guys.

Patrick Hallinan

executive
#59

Thanks.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.