Sunrun Inc. (RUN) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
September 9, 2020
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Moses Sutton
analystThank you, everyone, for joining us at the Barclays Energy and Power Conference. We want to especially thank the management team of Sunrun for being here with us. We're going to conduct a fireside chat with Lynn Jurich, CEO. First, Lynn, maybe I'll actually just pass it to you, give a 2-minute overview of the company. And then from there, we'll just jump right into questions.
Lynn Jurich
executiveSure, absolutely. So Sunrun is a company that Ed Fenster and I started about 13 years ago. And really, the vision was, we saw solar as this breakthrough technology. And really believe that the way it was going to change the energy industry is really to be a distributed technology, so on rooftops. And it would disrupt the entire sort of centralized hub-and-spoke model. And we decided to focus on consumers, assuming that would be the first place where you could really compete with the cost of power with solar because it was the most expensive, and we also believed that you could build [ active ] barriers in the business. So you could build things like a brand and distribution and reach and an operating platform that could form quite a compelling business as well. And 13 years later, many of those predictions have become true. And so we are -- here we are today. We have about 300,000 rooftop solar residential customers. And in -- when we combine with Vivint Solar, we'll have about 500,000, but just very much getting started. And the thing that I'm excited to talk more about today is we're really so much more than just a solar company. The vision is really to use homes as energy assets. And the addition of the battery technology that's come into affordability now, it has really enabled us to start to add the batteries, start to network all of our homes together, really building out sort of an energy internet and creating value and savings both for our customers, but then also really adding value to the entire grid. So now when we look at the business model, we really offer quite an attractive value prop to our customers, where they don't have to pay any money upfront for solar. We sell it as a service to them. And typically, they're saving money out of the gate. They're even saving money when they add a battery versus what they pay the utility. So it's a compelling value proposition for the consumer. For Sunrun, we average about $8,000 of lifetime value after all of our operations and maintenance expenses and our creation cost per customer. So it's an attractive unit margin to the company as well. And we feel like we're just getting started because we're 3% penetrated in a market that really can serve 40%, 50% of the entire U.S. electricity needs. So I'll stop there.
Moses Sutton
analystGreat. No.
Lynn Jurich
executiveGo ahead.
Moses Sutton
analystThat's a very helpful backdrop. I think it's great. We'll jump into a lot of those different matters. First, starting maybe with just the broader U.S. demand profile, the current environment where we are since COVID lows, the wildfire effects, so we sustainably back above pre-COVID levels, just sort of a state of where we are today, what the status quo is?
Lynn Jurich
executiveYes, absolutely. I think despite how painful some of that initial reaction and planning around COVID and what does this mean, despite all of that, I firmly believe it's probably one of the best things that could happen to the company and the company's prospects, and it's really on 2 dimensions. One is just consumer interest and really the psychology that it helped cultivate, which is this idea of -- institutions are letting me down. I really want to have more control over my lifestyle, over my family. I'm in my house, and I'm using 25% more electricity. And so there's this psychology around I want to adopt solar because it's a smart financial decision and because it allows me to have control in this world that feels unsafe. And then I'm sure we'll get to the wildfires and the hurricanes and all of that, but there's a whole resiliency aspect to that as well. That's even more scary if you're going to be losing power when you're stuck in your home. So I think in terms of just the value proposition to the customer, it's really enhanced. And so we're starting to see that certainly come through in terms of order numbers. Then on the cost side, what it really forced us to do was increase our corporate metabolism, so many of the changes we wanted to make around efficiency, selling remotely. Our sales reps are now 50% more productive than they were previously, installation efficiency, rolling drones out to make the site audits more cost-effective and more hands-free. It just really accelerated a lot of the improvements that were on our road map, but forced us to do them quite quicker, which we believe will enable us to have a lower cost structure. And we can either pass that through with lower savings to grow the market or we can take that in terms of increasing our unit level margin. So I think that we're certainly seeing growth return. If you look at the comments from the Q2 earnings call, we expect the third quarter to grow versus the second quarter well above 20%, and then we expect Q4 to grow as well from there. So again, the short term is coming back, but really what I'm more excited about is the long-term prospects around just the changing consumer psychology and the cost reductions that we would expect to realize going forward in a more normal environment.
Moses Sutton
analystGreat. That's a very comprehensive answer. And I like that phrase, corporate metabolism, it really does show you the sort of acceleration of some of the expectations we all had for where the business is going. And looking toward 2021, it's always hard to have real visibility, but new markets or high potential markets like Texas or Florida, what's the core value proposition? How is it evolving? Take -- you take Texas, for instance, it's competing very impressively with the incumbent energy source -- electricity source for the customer without net metering. So how do you think of some of these new exciting markets? How does this all pull together for '21? Customer education, all the different aspects driving that. So thoughts on a '21 and beyond basis?
Lynn Jurich
executiveSo we -- as I mentioned, are exiting the year with strong momentum. So Q3, up over 20%; Q4, up even above that. It's hard to always judge with what will happen with COVID. Certainly [ there are ] some frictions that are really short term, but some permitting offices that are understaffed. There's still some restrictions for selling in Illinois. We're still not fully staffed in our -- some of our retail properties. So there's some real -- still short-term frictions in the business. But there's a couple of big, exciting growth drivers that are happening. It's both in terms of unit level growth and interest, but then in terms of also expanding the value proposition and the opportunity per home. So on the unit side, what we're seeing is, again, this -- there's a -- it's really a -- it's starting to -- the value proposition is starting to shift a bit. Whereas in our early -- in our first decade, it was really a savings-oriented type offer, save 20% by switching over to solar. And now where we're seeing the real consumer pain is around resiliency. And you just see with the wildfires, the rolling blackouts, the hurricanes, and the value proposition that a battery can bring is quite compelling. So for those of you guys that -- first of all, everyone on the call should have solar at home, just put that plug out there. We're all...
Moses Sutton
analystNot yet. I don't have it yet.
Lynn Jurich
executiveOkay. Okay. Well, let's work on that. We're in 22 states and for you, a New Yorker. We're in New Jersey. We're in New York. We're in Connecticut. We're [indiscernible]. So we've got some compelling programs out there for you. But I think what we're seeing is that those outages are significant, and they're starting to hit a significant number of people. So [indiscernible] last year, 2 million people lost power for multiple days. So imagine what that is like when you're sheltering in place and you're doing Zoom calls for school. It's a real pain point. If you look at the East Coast, Hurricane Sandy, I think we lost power for about 2.4 million people. And then we -- the utility spent billions of dollars kind of hardening the lines and trying to make it more weatherproof, but then you have the latest Hurricane Isaias, sorry, apologies if I get that wrong, but that's the latest hurricane that came and after that -- which was weaker than Sandy, after we've hardened all the lines, another 1.4 million people lost power. So what you're starting to really see both at the consumer side, but then also at the regulator side and also at the political side is that with the extreme weather coming through, increasingly, the system of transporting power over old power lines, and it's just not -- it's not going to meet the needs of the 21st century. So I think you're starting to see both consumers realize that as well as regulators realize that and I'll -- I'm sure you'll have more questions on this. So I'll stop there, although I just -- I do want to highlight the sort of value proposition just because -- just to make it as simple as possible. So if you're -- for many customers in California, so an average customer might pay currently $190 a month for a -- for their electric bill. We would come in and put solar and replace much of the energy with solar. That would be $105. We would charge $45 per month for the battery. And then you would still have about $10 a month that you're still buying from the utility. So that's -- so you add that all together, and you're at $160 versus $180 from the utility. So the value proposition is that strong. It's 0 upfront cost. It's savings out of the gate. It's the battery that offers the resiliency. So again, that value proposition is very strong in California. It's increasingly strong on the East Coast where power prices are high. And so that takes some time to work its way through the system for people to get educated that this actually exists. So I think that's going to be a major driver for growth. And then in terms of the second point, which is expanding margin per home, the other trend that I think we'll talk a bit about is there's just a trend towards further electrification of the house. So when you want to add an electric vehicle, that adds another 30%-ish to your solar system size. And those incremental panels on the roof are very inexpensive for us to produce. So we're going to be increasingly pushing into the home to own more of the energy wallet, switching more of the devices over to electric, the heating, the cooking, switching the car over and really being the company where when you want clean, reliable, affordable electricity, you think of Sunrun. So a lot of that.
Moses Sutton
analystThat's great. No, I know that there's a lot there that people can work with that we could dig further into. A more high level question. At what point do we see the curve shift where we're -- it's really a 50-state solution. So some of the points you're making are specific to areas where customers are looking for resiliency. Sometimes the TV is just so, so attractive, maybe it's solar radiance, cost and so on. There's a certain point, maybe it's on the cost curve, maybe it's on the utility rates that you start to see everything go like this. Any thoughts on that very long-term view?
Lynn Jurich
executiveYes. No. Absolutely, it will definitely get there. Now there's going to be -- it's going to be uneven in terms of how fast it penetrates just because the value proposition varies based on how much sun you get based on the incumbent power prices. But if you just look structurally at what's happening, our advantage is quite significant. So our costs continue to come down. The cost of solar and batteries has continued to decrease swiftly, and there's more to come. At the same time, incumbent electricity rates have been increasing 3% ever single year for the past on average. That's the CAGR for the past 15 years. And what's interesting in that number is that it really is disguising a ton of CapEx that is needed. So if you think about the last decade, we've had really inexpensive natural gas with fracking and things. So the wholesale cost of energy has actually really significantly declined, yet the retail price has continued to escalate. And that really shows you that there's just massive investment in transmission, distribution that has to happen and this extreme weather, it's just going to make it that much worse. So I think the spend -- the utility spend estimate over -- it's $120 billion in CapEx next year. It's $3 billion -- excuse me, $2 trillion over the next decade. So that's a market that we're definitely going to compete against, and it gives -- it does give you some tailwinds in terms of being able to be more and more competitive in additional states. If you look at some of the studies that NREL has done, there's some good mapping to say, okay, if you look state by state, how -- and look at suitable roofs, what percentage of the state's power needs could you fill -- fulfill by covering roofs with solar? And nationwide, it's 40%. So this is not a small piece of the solution. In California, it's 75%. So you're going to see variation in terms of how fast you penetrate. Hawaii is already penetrated in many cases at about 30% of single-family homes. Australia is similar. And again, U.S. is only 3% overall. So there's a lot of room to go. And a lot of it is going to depend on also how do we set up? As you add the battery, the battery can really -- particularly when you have a lot of customers and you can network those batteries and coordinate with the utility, they can really act as a virtual power plant and replace traditional infrastructure. So what we're really working on is how do we open those markets so that we can actually get some value from that because it's another value driver that'll enable adoption faster. And frankly, help us decarbonize which we -- decarbonize energy, which we have to do in order to hit any sort of reasonable climate goal.
Moses Sutton
analystThat's very helpful. And I want to follow up on a point there. Like you, call it, the NREL metric of 40%. So is it fair to sort of -- if I'm -- I get this question a lot. If I'm sizing the overall market, let's say, it's 150 million homes, including multifamily, something around 40% of that, that's like saying 60 million homes, we have 2.5 million or 3 million penetrated. At a flat run rate, that's like saying half a century, hypothetically, just very high level type numbers.
Lynn Jurich
executiveWell, I mean, yes, if we continue at the current pace, but that won't happen because [indiscernible] increasingly get faster. The other interesting thing that's happening is this next year is the first year where the adoption of electric vehicles will be surpassing residential solar in terms of the forecast. I still may question that -- over time that forecast. But what's interesting about that is that's another sales channel for us because when you look at electric vehicle buyers, the majority of them are interested in powering that by solar. And in fact, the data suggests that as many as 40% to 50% of people who buy an electric vehicles get solar. And so that will be another unlock in terms of making this a little bit less of a push sell and more of a pull sell. You also have Biden's clean energy targets, where he put out -- full pretty much decarbonization by 2035, which is an ambitious target and a doable target. But it really is going to start at the home level. And so we feel like we're in a really privileged position in order to help realize that goal.
Moses Sutton
analystAnd if I move for narrower than broader demand and think of the leasing PPA-type products versus cash and loan. Can you discuss the dynamic over the next few years, assuming the ITC steps down, if it doesn't, how do you -- there's a whole discussion on that side of the market that is often missed by people. Any color there?
Lynn Jurich
executiveYes. I think we, as many of you guys may know, we have been in the solar-as-a-service model as a way to make it affordable and easy for people to adopt. People are -- and there's a lot of advantages to it and a lot of just structural advantages to it. There's just more value created when a business owns the system versus a homeowner. So from a first principal standpoint, we believe that the value is there. And that's because there are additional tax benefits that a corporate owner receives versus a homeowner, which allows you to create system-wide value. You also have this feature where the tax credit -- and sorry for those of you guys that are newer to the story here. But you also have this feature in the industry where the tax credit that incentivizes this is -- was 30% of the cost of the value of the system, dropping to 26%, dropping to 22% and then dropping to 10% over the next few years. And as a corporate owner, we're able to prepurchase some amount of equipment and really safe harbor on the previous year's credit. And that really only applies to commercially owned or solar-as-a-service-type product. So there's another value proposition that happens just by a feature of the tax policy. And then finally, when you -- when the tax credit is set to [ sunset ] to 0 for a homeowner, it stays at 10% for a commercial owner. So the cost -- the structural advantage for arbitrage, if you will, for a commercial owner will only increase over the next few years, which I believe will tip the industry back towards solar-as-a-service. The -- so -- and I think the reality is it's still a fairly fragmented market. There are a couple of thousand solar companies that are out there selling solar. And many of them do not have access to a solar-as-a-service-type product, which is part of why I think you've seen that -- some of the shift to the loan. I do think that changes as the system gets more complex. I highlighted this earlier. Previously, we were just sort of selling solar. It's almost like sort of like a basic solar, dumb solar, if you will. That's a pretty easy product to put up on the roof. As the system gets more complex and we start to electrify more of the home and communicate more with the utilities and bring value through these virtual power plant type of opportunities. I think that lends itself to more of a service model and will also really help build an entry barrier into the industry going forward.
Moses Sutton
analystGreat. Great, great. And I want to take the comments you made on the ITC and some of the effect that has on the shift. Let's say, it's extended. How do you see that playing out maybe in terms of demand? Or maybe the unit economics? Sort of a subpart to that question would be, alternatively, if it does step down, there is some effect, some net effect on the NPV, but you talked about the 8,000 per customer. Functionally after you work through from unlevered to levered and net returns to Sunrun, how do you think the ITC is going to play a role? And what happens in either of these binary directions, assuming it can get extended or drop off to 10%?
Lynn Jurich
executiveRight. Certainly, we plan for the step down. And for a little bit of context, again, for those who are newer to the industry, we've had way more significant rebate declines over the past 10 years and grown them just by feature of these tailwinds that we have. Power prices continue to go up. Our costs continue to go down, which offsets any sort of subsidy decline. And far -- what we've grown through far exceeds the step down for the ITC. So just to quantify that a little bit, in order to stay neutral on our NPV, we would need to remove about 4% out of our cost structure per year and increased price about 2% per year. So these are all -- and again, we think that given that the utilities are at 3% and 4% inflation, there's the ability to step our price up a bit. And we're also on this pretty significant cost decline. And then furthermore, I think the value proposition does shift as it's less just comparing the solar rate to the utility rate. Now it's more electrifying your home, electrifying your vehicle, you're competing with the cost of gas. There's a value proposition around resiliency. We're in the middle of like a very dynamic and big change in terms of how the business model evolves, I believe. So I think we're planning for that tax credit decline. Certainly, it's an excellent policy, and I believe the Biden campaign and much of Congress is in favor. [indiscernible] has it's really a -- it's a massive job creator, and that's always a winner in Washington. And solar was one of the fastest-growing job categories. It's one of the only policies that we have in place that really helps on climate, and it's already there. So it's an easy extend. So there are strong prospects that, that does happen. And certainly, that just helps create more value, but we're definitely not planning.
Moses Sutton
analystGreat. Great. And what policies are you watching otherwise? So the California new home mandate, maybe it's had a bit more of a muted effect than everyone thought. Are there similar such policies that can really over catalyze the demand in a certain market? Net metering policies, always hard to follow what's going on in 30-plus states. Any thoughts on what's on the horizon there? And then lastly, on -- in the Biden or democratic scenario, thoughts on a potential storage subsidy, do you think that, that's pretty viable? So sort of a lot of different avenues and policies. What are you thinking?
Lynn Jurich
executiveYes. I think what's really interesting -- so let's take these California rolling blackouts as an example, because I do think it's -- state level is really where a lot of this stuff is going to play out. We have the ITC, but really a lot of this is going to happen at the state level or even at the ISO level. So take California. So when we had these rolling blackouts, the Public Utility Commission actually reached out to us. And said, hey, can you export the power out of your batteries at this peak time in order to help us with the shortage? And this is a significant potential resource. So if you just look at we were -- I think we were short a couple of days like 500 megawatts. If we -- that is 125,000 homes with batteries. That's it. That's all we would need to be able to coordinate and shift that power back into the grid. Now the -- we're -- we still don't have the mechanism in place where we actually get compensated for that. So right now, we're opening, what we call, these grid services programs, which are these revenue programs where we are reducing demand on our homes and we -- with the solar and the battery, and we're getting paid for that, but it's a fraction of what the value is worth. If we could rewrite the rules where we actually can get paid for that capacity and that power that goes back to the grid, which we're starting to do, then you're starting to add a huge number, a huge value source to the customer base and a huge value to just the infrastructure. So I think those are some of the most meaningful policy changes that we're going to see. And so if you just look at what we've been able to do about -- we've been able to open up these markets for these grid services revenues in about 10% of our geographies right now. And the goal is to massively extend that. So we want -- again, we want to build our homeowners and our homes to actually be assets to the entire system and be able to be compensated for that. So those rules are top of mind for us, and I think will drive significant value. You also -- that also -- what it does as well is if you can have discrete programs with the utilities, it's also a marketing tactic where people feel comfortable with that, those endorsed by the utility. It feels -- they get an additional sort of kick back and then -- and savings to switch over to solar. And then for us, we estimate that, that adds another about $2,000 of net present value per customer on top of our current $8,000 of value. So those we're really watching and developing, frankly.
Moses Sutton
analystYes. No, that's very high. And it does dovetail well into sort of an update on the Vivint merger. You could quickly review the $90 million synergy target. What do you think happens with demand? Any dissynergies related to overlapping sales? And then, of course, your attachment rate's been higher on the batteries than them. So can you sort of retrofit a lot of -- this is one of the key themes, of course, when you retrofit a lot of their base of assets, which are already in dense communities typically, so that you get more good service opportunities beyond that 10% of your current Sunrun-only base?
Lynn Jurich
executiveAbsolutely. So a lot of questions in there. So first just again, the -- so we reached an agreement to acquire Vivint, who is the #2 market share in this industry, back in July. We expect that to close in Q4. The combined companies together, as I mentioned, would have about 0.5 million customers, and it's very, very, very complementary businesses. So one, we estimated the synergies at about $90 million between the 2 companies. And as we go through the integration planning right now, that's feeling very achievable. The other benefit we've realized when -- as we've gone through the integration planning is, the -- one, the synergies feel very achievable; and two, the company's cultures are quite similar, which is fantastic. And so we're really not finding any of this sort of social issues or things that can derail some progress on that. So we're really encouraged by that. We don't expect any revenue dissynergies. We have very complementary -- in fact, we believe in the opposite. As you mentioned, they do have a lower attach rate on battery. So enabling that product and the training and the installation capability of that product will be a meaningful value creator. They also -- because of their business model -- again, so their go-to-market strategy is direct-to-home canvassing. And that's a very useful strategy when you have these targeted grid services programs. So it enables you to really direct your resources with more precision, which was one of the motivating factors for the acquisition. We also just -- we just need, as I mentioned earlier, 3% penetration here. How do we actually become -- achieve that 30%, 40% of rooftops and ship the model for more of a push sell to more of a pull sell. And so just more points of distribution, more awareness around solar, around building the Sunrun brand. I think we can get there. And as I mentioned, our goal is to be really the most loved energy companies. It's the company you think about when you want reliable, clean, affordable power for your house. And I think having that sort of the different go-to-market channels available where Sunrun -- we're more oriented towards digital marketing, resell in retail stores, Costco home depots of the world. So we have a lot of points of distribution there. And so it's just quite complementary on the revenue side. So we're really excited to get that closed and get going. Did I answer all your...
Moses Sutton
analystNo, no, that's great. And...
Lynn Jurich
executiveThere were a lot of questions in there.
Moses Sutton
analystI think you did. And it is very exciting. Maybe I could tie one more into the 4 other strategic moves of the company. That partnership with SK, what is it? I mean, it seems -- it's a very stealthy press release there. We don't really have much data on it. Anything you could provide beyond it would be helpful.
Lynn Jurich
executiveRight. We look a little mystery out there. No. As I mentioned before, I think the strategic plan for us and the strategic vision is really around further home electrification. And you're starting -- and what that means is actually eliminating natural gas lines into the home, that means electrifying the vehicles. And you're starting to see that trend happen. So there's multiple cities in California now that have banned any natural gas coming into the house in new homes. And that will significantly be a trend. And what that does really is that gives you the potential to almost -- if you take all of that profit yourself, that enables you to almost double your customer values. So -- and/or start to, again, reduce price to increase demand, which is likely going to be one of the ways that we use those levers as well. So I think we're pretty encouraged by that. I think we wanted to do -- we set up the company really to do some R&D and sort of really start to think about how do you make that process? What are the set of products and services and customer experience that makes that switch over to electrification easier? And that's really what that company is all about. So we're not commenting more than that, but we're pretty excited by the prospects.
Moses Sutton
analystAll right. I mean, looking forward to the updates on that. I think we're just about out of time. Maybe if we could just squeeze one last one. As sort of tying everything together, what do you think is the greatest misconception around the company, around the industry, if you could pick one?
Lynn Jurich
executiveIf I could pick one is it's the scale and the importance of decentralized energy in our system. The only way we're going to actually get to a renewable, like a renewable future, is to also have decentralized assets into -- because you have to match [Audio Gap] and you have to -- the centralized resources are intermittent. I'm not saying we're going to get rid of wind farms and solar farms and all of that. That's going to be a part of the system. But it's intermittent. So you got to manage the demand side. So they have to coexist. And the potential for that demand side to actually have more resiliency, a cheaper build-out then hardening all of these lines. And as I mentioned before, could serve -- just with existing technology and rooftops could serve 40% of America's power needs. And you don't have to have a worst feature. It's actually cheaper. So we run the math on if you fully electrify your life, you could save $1,000 to $2,000 on your bill, and you don't have to sacrifice. You have better cooking, you have a better car. You don't have to go to the gas station, you have cheaper savings on your electricity, and you have backup power. So it's like this -- there's a future where we can be carbon free, where you don't have to sacrifice, and we're really going to be the leader in building that out, and it should be -- that's why we think our market size adds like the $120 billion of CapEx that utilities are going to spend next year. That's really our market size.
Moses Sutton
analystThat's great. It's very exciting. Thanks again, Lynn and the Sunrun team for joining us today. Take care.
Lynn Jurich
executiveAll right. Take care, everybody.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Sunrun Inc. transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Sunrun Inc. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.