Symbotic Inc. (SYM) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
May 18, 2023
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Operator
operatorPlease welcome to the stage, Jeff Evanson, Vice President of Investor Relations.
Jeff Evanson
executiveAll right. Thank you, everyone. I hope you enjoyed the tour that we had earlier today of the Brooksville Regional Distribution Center, the tour of the Symbotic system as well as the BreakPack system. Welcome, everyone, now to our presentation section -- session of our Investor Relations Day, and welcome to our webcast audience as well. We're glad that you could join us virtually and we look forward to taking you on a tour of one of our facilities sometime in the near future. I want to make the point that all of the materials that we're going to be presenting today, all of the slides, the videos as well as a replay of the webcast will all be available on our Investor Relations website at Symbotic.com. Just a few important disclaimers there. And then our agenda for today is we're going to have our CEO and Founder, Rick Cohen, talk about our vision at the company. Next up, we'll have our Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing, Mike Dunn, discuss our growth strategies. Then we will have Bill Mines. Bill Mines is our Senior Vice President of Supply Chain. He'll talk about all the hard work he's been doing in the area of setting up outsourcing partnerships and the benefits associated with that. And then next up, we have a really exciting portion of our presentation, our innovation panel. Innovation is so important to Symbotic. It really is the heart of this company. And so we are having our Chief Strategy Officer, Bill Boyd host panel of some of our leading innovation people, our Chief Technology Officer; George Dramalis; our Senior Vice President of Hardware Engineering; Cristian Mori; as well as our Symbotic fellow, Ted Macdonald, discussing mobile automation. Then finally, many of you have already met Tom Ernst, our Chief Financial Officer. Tom will take us through finance presentation. And finally, we will conclude with a Q&A panel with everyone on stage. So without further ado, again, thank you for joining us. And I'd like to welcome Rick Cohen to the stage. Rick?
Richard Cohen
executiveThanks, Jeff. So thanks, everybody, for coming today. I have a chance to talk to a lot of you. And so I'm supposed to talk about our vision, but let me tell you why we do what we do and why I do what I do as a way of explaining the vision. So I joined my family business with my father and my brother in 1974, and that was a wholesale grocery business. It was a very small business, we did about $50 million a year. I just graduated from Wharton with a degree in accounting and computer science, which, in '74, computer science was a relatively new thing. I'm not sure they called it computer science. But I did do enough diligence on my family business and I found out that we actually weren't making any money. So in 1974 million, I started working with my father and my brother to kind of create a uniqueness to C&S. And eventually, we were -- we left Worcester where we had very expensive labor, and we moved that business to Brattleboro, Vermont. And we did about $100 million in sales that year. In 1989, we developed the first warehouse wireless management system at C&S. And if you think about '89, it was like 3 years before the Internet was invented or certainly took off. And so we were using wireless technology in a warehouse in 1989, which was unheard of. And it was probably the biggest failure of my life, in one sense, and the biggest success -- one of the biggest successes. Big success was we took our operating cost down 50%. In 1989, we did $900 million that year. And then we grew because our costs were so low, $1 billion a year for 25 straight years. So we had 17% compounded growth for 20-something years. It was crazy. And -- but what I realized was that, that wireless warehouse management system was probably worth more than the wholesale grocery business, and I hadn't taken advantage of that disruption. And it took 10 years or 20 years later for EXE, Manhattan and all those guys to actually come up with a warehouse management system that was capable of doing what we were doing. So that leads me to the vision of what Symbotic is. So after working through this process at C&S and realizing that we had kind of maxed out where we were because other people now had warehouse management systems and so they were telling people what to do, they were telling people where to put stuff. The next frontier was actually robotics. And so in the early '90s, I started working at robotics, made a couple of trips to Germany, bought a couple of robots, programmed them and nothing worked. In the year, I think '99, we bought a SCHAEFER system in a building that we had at C&S that was 1.5 million square feet, 100 feet tall, had 38 3,000-pound cranes, largest food warehouse, maybe in the world but certainly in the United States. And what I realized after building that was that the SCHAEFER system was terrible, and it was a good thing I owned the place or I would have got fired. I learned to hate cranes. And that bigger isn't always better unless you have a very flexible system. That led to the start of Symbotic in 2007. So I was looking for some ideas on what we could do basically at C&S. And so that started my original investment in Symbotic. And in that -- in the process of between 2007 and 2020, I invested $700 million of my kids' money in the business. And then in '20, we actually started to become relatively cash neutral. We had been working with Walmart for a while. And somebody asked me today, when did you realize you were going to be profitable? Probably in 2019, even though we haven't done it yet, but we will very soon. And so the vision for Symbotic is to be the best automation company in the world, number one; but number two is to move every box in the world. I can't think of any other vision that suits how big an opportunity this is. I think we -- in the Walmart world, 97% of the boxes that we move in the world of 2 feet by 2 feet by 2 feet. So excluding automobiles, but including auto parts, excluding refrigerators, but including refrigerator parts, is about 8 cubic feet moves about 97% of everything that moves in the world outside of big machinery. So let's say, consumer products and actually parts. We are, far and away, the best company, in my humble opinion, at moving boxes in the world. So why shouldn't we build a business that is capable being bigger and bigger and bigger? The magic of robotics, and you all, as investors, know this. The reason there's so much carnage in the robotics space is that everybody underestimates how difficult this is. So people say, well, 1 error per 1,000 is pretty good for a robot. What we're striving for is we are about 1 error per 10,000 in Symbotic. And within the next year, we will be 1 error per 1 million and maybe 1 error per 2 million. What does that mean? It means basically hardly any humans in the structure. And the big problem with robotics is that what you saw today, there's very few people on our side of the building that are actually working. There were some trainees and there were some -- you saw people on the dock, but saw very, very few people in our system. That's the goal. The vision is a lights-out warehouse that's capable of moving 97% of the boxes in the world. That's how big this business is. I was reading -- I love to read business books. If anybody's got some suggestions, text me or send me, but one of the great books was the Everything Store about Amazon; the One Device, which is the history of the iPhone. And recently, I was reading a book, and I saw this quote, it's pretty common. I've seen [indiscernible] report. It's the Amara Hype Cycle. Roy Amara is a futurist. And his quote is, we tend -- it's called Amara's law. "we tend to overestimate the effective technology in the short run and underestimate the effect in the long run." So in the short run, I think everybody's overestimated how much you can do with each picking and robotic cans. But in the long run, we are going to be able to move 97% of the boxes in the world. And that's really the big opportunity. And so my vision for Symbotic is really a long-term vision. This is not a build-and-flip business. That's not -- I'm a large shareholder. That's not what I want to do. What I want to do is have a great customer, a great company, with a huge potential, so we can run for a long time, have brightly happy employees because everything we're doing that you saw today in Walmart, I had a bunch of ideas. I think I'm one of the world's experts in distribution. A lot of these things came from Walmart said, could you do this for me? Could you do this for me? Could you do this for me? So the BreakPack solution that you saw today, we work with Walmart to develop. But that's exactly the same solution that Walgreens and CVS and everybody, a lot of food service, a lot of vendors put stuff in totes. That's a perfect solution for them. That business, by itself, if I was going to an investor conference or I was a startup and I presented BreakPack, that would be a business that could do its own IPO. That's how big that business is. But what Symbotic is trying to do is provide, what I like to say, with a bit of hyperbole, we want to be the iOS of this thing. And BreakPack is just an app. And the big bots are just an app. But what you saw today is that we can make any size bot, and the software is the same. So we're using NVIDIA chips. We're using cameras. We're using enough horsepower and compute power that's 1,000x bigger than the bot we replaced this year. So we could do big machines. We could do fork trucks. Right now, we have this huge backlog, so we're going to focus on making brightly happy customers. But we are going to continue to invest in R&D, and that goes to the third part of why I do what I do. So I ran -- and because of the cool people that I get to work with. So when I ran C&S, I was the third generation of Cohen to run that business. The business is 105 years old. I thought my job was to get the business to the next generation, and I thought the generation would have a last name like Cohen. Well, my oldest child, my progeny, not child. My old -- my son is -- who's 47, worked for me twice, and decided he didn't want to do it anymore, and he's doing wonderful things with nonprofits, and I'm very proud of all my progeny. They tell me they're not children. So they're progeny. So I decided -- so I went kind of through this period of depression thinking I was a failure. And then I said, well, I like young people. I'll just work with somebody else's kids. So I found the CEO to run Symbotic, C&S, terrific 40 -- Bob worked with me 30 years now. We have a 40-year old has been announced as a new upcoming CEO for C&S. And so I spend a tremendous amount of my time looking for all ages, but especially 30- and 40-year-olds, 20-year-olds, who are really interested in bleeding edge, AI, machine learning and kind of the stuff we're doing. And that is our competitive advantage. The advantage of C&S -- that Symbotic have is we never had a legacy product. So we didn't have to hang on to anything. We are an innovation lab, and we will continue to be an innovation lab. And it's just so much fun. It is a blast being around these young people who come to the old guy in the mountain and say, do you think this will work? I got this idea. Do you think this will work? And that's really my job is kind of coach and mentor. I understand warehouse distribution probably, I don't know, maybe there's 10 of us in the world that understand it this well because we've lived it our whole life. But the technology that's involved in automating this space is very, very difficult. And one of the reasons why it's so difficult is when you're automating a chip plant, first of all, the place is probably vacuum, pure oxygen. Every part of the environment is controlled. And when you're automating an auto plant, you have all your suppliers and everything is prescreened and pre-automated. When you go into one of these warehouses, the humidity flows between 30% and 90%. The temperature goes between 50 and 110. And the manufacturers that you're buying from oftentimes make crappy products. That's a very hard problem to solve. And it's really interesting to the team at Symbotic. The other thing that's very hard to solve, and this is where I think people don't fully appreciate like what's so different about your system. The fact that we're driving 250-pound self-driving vehicles is incredibly difficult. The reason it's so exciting to our team is, we're probably not going to kill anybody. You can actually write code and look at it at the same time. And we don't have the government looking over our back saying, no, you can't do that, you can't do that, you can't do that. So we're getting an increasingly number of people that we're working in the self-driving vision, AI space from companies like Cruise or Tesla saying, I don't know if my work ever be realized. And so they come in and work for us because here, you can go to Brooksville and watch 400 autonomous vehicles running around and doing incredible stuff. And what's magic about our system that will keep evolving that has given us the lead over our competition is the fact that we started working on this 3 or 4 years ago. And we are getting some of the very, very, very best talent in the country to do this stuff. And so the autonomous vehicles allow you to do stuff faster, more flexibly. You couldn't do our system in BreakPack if you didn't have autonomous vehicles. If you had dumb shuttle stuck in an aisle, you couldn't do what we do. And so we made the jump, and we're going to get better and better. And our bots are going to get faster and faster. They're going to get more accurate. They will have collision avoidance at some time. And some of this stuff, the other thing that's so exciting about where we are is it seems to me that every 15 years, there is a confluence of technology. So if you say '92 was the birth of the Internet or the blooming of the Internet, even though it was started way early in that. 15 years later, 2007 was the iPhone. 2022, I'm not saying we're it, but everybody is talking about the confluence of AI, machine learning and robotics. And we are absolutely on the leading, bleeding edge of that. The beauty of what we're doing is we're a well-funded start-up with a $12 billion backlog, and we're treating this like a well-funded start-up. That's kind of an oxymoron because some of the edge of a startup is you don't want to be well funded because you want to -- everything has to work. But because of me and because of my experience in warehousing, we're setting a very, very high bar on quality and reliability of the machines, which makes them truly, truly self-autonomous robots in many aspects as opposed to 1 error per 100 will not make it. That company will go out of business because you'll have a human standing right next to the robot. And at some point, you'll say, why do I need the robot? Even at 1 per 1,000, you'll say, why do I need that? So you've got to be stratospherically high numbers. It's really not that high. It's Six Sigma. It's 1 error per 1 million, or Seven Sigma, 1 error per 2 million. And the stuff that we're doing, we're using AI and machine learning and vision and all the stuff that's coming out of these great schools, plus we had great people to start with is what's really creating a huge moat between us and everybody else. The third thing that creates the moat is these are $100 million systems. You can't just sell $100 million system to somebody if it doesn't work. So you've got to figure out how to test it. And so you need a customer base that because of my relationship with some of these customers through the many years of C&S, there's a level of credibility that they'll actually let us test this stuff in some of their warehouses. And we also have enough deep pockets, though, that if it doesn't work, we figure out a solution. So it's about a huge business and an evolving business with lots of interesting applications. Brightly happy customers, and what I like to say is brightly happy employees. So one of the reasons we went public is because the folks -- the buzz at Symbotic is, I'm so happy that these people own stock. And I'm so happy that they think it's going to go up forever, and they're supposed to make it go up forever. But the fact that they are able to participate in the value creation is just -- for me, it's just spectacular having spent 105 years as a family with a very private business. It's a very special thing. So with that, I'll stop, and you've seen a lot of stuff, and I'll be available for questions at the end. And what's next, Jeff? Okay. Turn it back to Jeff.
Jeff Evanson
executiveAll right. Thank you very much, Rick. Really appreciate all your insights and foresight. Next up, I welcome Mike Dunn to the stage. Mike is our Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing. Mike?
Michael Dunn
executiveThanks, Jeff. I'll reiterate what Jeff and Rick both said, thanks for those of you that took the time to come visit us. I get the pleasure of representing this company and representing this product out in the market. And I can tell you that it's different if you get to see it in person. And you guys got to see it in person, those of you that are here today. So thanks for taking the time to do that. We think it's a big benefit to actually see the system working in person. What I want to talk to you about today is a little bit of our growth strategy and how we think about going to market. We've taken the time to build sort of bottoms-up what we think our strategically addressable markets look like. This is -- as Rick said, this is a huge market. If you read about spending and projected spending in warehousing technology, it's well over $1 trillion when you look at it over time. We've tried to take a very conservative view and do a bottoms-up build of what we think the market looks like for us. And really broken this down into 3 categories, we call Sym 1, Sym 2, Sym 3. And this is really about industries and geographies that we go after from a sales perspective. Sym 1 is really the industries that we're focused on today and where we've got success. That is around general merchandise, retail, food, both wholesale and retail, apparel and footwear space. That market, conservatively, we think, is close to $150 billion of opportunity for us. And then as you step in the Sym 2 -- and by the way, sorry, that's all U.S. based. As you step into Sym 2, which adds additional verticals that we think the product fits very well into verticals like automotive aftermarket, et cetera. You add north of $100 billion to that market. And then as we think about sort of taking the wraps off and looking at international opportunities in these same markets, so Canada, Mexico, Europe, et cetera, we're approaching $0.5 billion market conservatively that we're focused on. We review this and recast this on a regular basis. For those of you that have seen this view previously we're up about $40 billion in total and what we think the market looks like for us on a go-forward basis. So how do we execute on that strategy? So our primary focus today and our sales team is small. Rick likes to say we don't have a sales problem or a demand problem. We're continuing to grow the capacity of the business. We have a small sales team. You basically met us today. For those of you that are in the room, myself and Jason and Rick do pretty much all the selling today. But we're focused today on industry -- on customers that we have today. So that's Walmart, C&S, Wholesale Grocers and Albertsons. We have more customers than that, but those are where we see growth opportunities. And so we're focused on expanding our reach into those customers. At the same time, looking to expand into new customers in those industries, those Sym 1 industries that we're focused on. This would be grocery and general merchandise retail. You would have seen us announce here in the last couple of quarters, 2 new customer wins in this space, United Natural Foods, which is a large wholesale food customer; and Associated Food Stores, which is a co-op on the West Coast of the U.S. servicing their co-op stores. So we feel really good about our execution in driving the strategy. We're not trying to add dozens of customers. Tom likes to say we're trying to add 1 or 2 a year, and that's the pace that we'll continue at for the near term as we build capacity to support the current backlog demand and the demand that we have coming in. That said, we are beginning to think about adding to our sales team, expanding and beginning what I would call the outreach selling that we frankly don't do a lot of today. And so we are actively engaged in potential new customers across all of these areas on this slide. So in new verticals like third-party logistics, apparel, automotive, home improvement, we've got active engagements in all of those verticals. We have active engagements with potential customers in many new geographies around the country, Canada, Mexico, Europe, Asia Pacific. Again, all of that, we're very focused on when is the right time for us to engage with those customers and who are the right customers to engage with given that we don't have a sales problem. We're able to be selective about which companies that we want to work with in those space. So I want to spend a few minutes and sort of give you some additional perspective on what we hear in the sales process from our customers in terms of why we win, where the system creates value for them and then give you a couple of anecdotes in terms of what we're seeing from a sales cycle perspective. So our system has a dramatically positive impact on virtually every metric that a company would measure their supply chain and distribution performance. The most obvious one is labor. Again, hopefully, for those of you that had a chance to join us on the tour today, you saw a stark difference between the labor associated with the legacy operational side of the business and then the automated side and the number of people that it takes to do that job. Maurice, the General Manager, talked to you a little bit about the people and how exciting these jobs were and how turnover was so much lower in the space. That's a big part of the company's cost is the amount of churn that they see in these operational jobs in the warehouse. Really strong accuracy. I mentioned earlier today, damages and errors and miss picks that drive tremendous costs in the supply chain are virtually driven to 0 as we deploy the Symbotic technology. I had a chance to talk to a few of you today about the inventory impact of our system. So we have the opportunity to take tremendous amount of inventory out of a supply chain in a legacy traditional environment, what they call economic order quantity is typically a pallet because that's the unit of movement through a warehouse. And we changed the game there. You can now order at the case level or at the layer level, which effectively allows you to not overbuy, especially in your slow-moving items where a pallet may mean you're carrying 60 or 90 days of inventory. Now you can move to purchasing at a layer level or purchasing at a case level and carrying the right amount of inventory in your supply chain. We had a chance to look at and kind of hopefully give you a visual on the space impact of our system. We see pickups between 40% and 60% improvement in the footprint required to do the same amount of throughput, which for a company like Walmart, that's growing at 4% a year on such a large base, really just gives them more longevity. You heard Mike Walden today talk about the ability to do more throughput and not having to add any additional space as a big win for them. When we talk to customers that are potentially building new facilities, they're able to build much smaller new facilities to do the same throughput than what they would be able to do with either traditional methods or even other technology providers. One of the points here on this slide, which I want to make sure we highlight, is a really key differentiator for Symbotic, which is we don't need a new warehouse. So Rick talked about buying a SCHAEFER System and the technology he deployed with cranes and such. Because of the fundamentals of that technology, it really required him to build a new warehouse for that. And that's what we see from a lot of the competitors for Symbotic. And then stark contrast to that, Symbotic system can be started -- can be built very small. It can be built modularly. It can grow over time. In fact, virtually every system that we build is built in phases. And so you saw that today. Phase 1 was running. Phase 2 will be running soon. Phase 3 will be running in a few months, and there will be a Phase 4 and probably a Phase 5 in that building. So that's a huge benefit. Many of these companies already have warehouses exactly where they want them to be. They're big enough, and they're the right size. And so the ability to go into an existing building and retrofit with the technology is a big benefit. We saw some of the transportation impacts, which has downstream performance impacts, but also the opportunity to lower transportation costs. Transportation costs, depending on the business, would tend to be 40% to 60% of your total supply chain costs. So you can see companies over indexing like you saw at Walmart today, in the past where they really tried to optimize transportation at the expense of other things. And we allow the opportunity to actually optimize all of the above and drive down transportation costs. And then the last point I'll make here, there's a number of other benefits. Damages and waste. We see the operation you saw today at peak will ship 1 million cases. We'll have maybe 1 damage, maybe 0 in a week. That's drastically different than what they see as shrink and damage in an existing operation. And then upscaling talent. So again, we've talked about this. And the team at Walmart today kind of highlighted this point. But the amount of turnover that happens in these existing operations, the scarcity of labor and the ability to take some of that talent and teach them new skills, give them a career path, get them excited about their job, give the younger generation gamification and what they want to do as they come to work every day, really is game-changing. So let me close by sharing a little bit of perspective on what we're seeing in terms of sales cycle with new customers. Traditionally, in a space like this where you're selling hundreds of millions of dollar systems and sometimes you're doing $300 million and $400 million and $500 million or multibillion-dollar contracts, those would be 2- to 3-year sales cycle processes from beginning to actually inking a deal. We're living in crazy times right now through the pandemic, obviously, and with the situation that we see, especially in terms of labor, both cost and availability. Companies, we're seeing, are really accelerating their decision timelines and processes around this. So one of the recent customers that joined our customer list, what would have typically been a 2- to 3-year sales cycle was a 9-month sales cycle. So that is from the point at which we had really the initial conversations with them about the opportunity, the problems through scoping out the actual project, working with the customer to build a business case, getting through multiple rounds of Board-level approvals and ultimately to a contract for a commitment to deploy multiple sites of Symbotic was about a 9-month process. And that's pretty unheard of. And I think that's a testament to Board-level pressure in the business to solve these problems. So we're seeing all -- most C-level executives that we talked about and Board-level folks that we talk to are very concerned about the labor situation, are very concerned about not just the cost, but the availability, and they view these as sort of mission-critical future growth enablers for the business. So we're actually seeing pressure from Boards down into the business versus usually it goes the other direction to go solve this problem and solve it fast and solve it in a big way. So that's an exciting part for me from a sales perspective. Don't know how long that pace will last, but we're living in a good time from a sales go-to-market perspective. So with that, thanks for your time. Again, thanks for being here. I'll turn this back over to Jeff.
Jeff Evanson
executiveAll right. Thank you very much, Mike. Next up, we have Bill Mines, our Senior Vice President of Supply Chain. You heard Mike say that sales and demand is not our constraint. In fact, it's getting systems deployed. And so Bill, come up on stage. Bill is going to walk us through the strategies he's been deploying to accelerate that pace and the reasons why we're doing so. Bill?
William Mines
executiveThank you, Jeff, and good afternoon, everybody. As Rick and Mike have said, this is a very exciting time to be with Symbotic. I joined the company last July. Prior to that, I spent 8 years at Walmart, helping to run their supply chain and logistics organization. First met Rick back in 2016, and we could see the sort of potential of the system to solve a lot of problems in Walmart's supply chain and help improve it. Walmart, as a customer, you probably know this, very demanding and sets very high bars. We set the bar incredibly high, I think, in terms of what we were expecting Symbotic to achieve and deliver in terms of things like system uptime, throughput, accuracy. Pretty much every metric that Mike just put up there on the slide, we figured out what world class was and set the bar at that level. And it's really exciting now to see Symbotic consistently achieving and, in many cases, exceeding that bar. And I think sets us up for a huge opportunity in the future. Again, as Mike put up, there's a lot of other industry segments out there, a massive potential to the system that we're not yet tapping into. So very exciting time to be with the company, and I think a lot of runway ahead. I'm going to talk a little bit about what we're doing from a supply chain perspective. And in particular, if we were going to accomplish those objectives and achieve those goals, one of the things that we've got to do is -- and we're working on is building a network of partners out there that can help build the system, install it and commission it. So if you're on the tour -- sorry. If you're on the tour, you'll be able to appreciate that we tend to think of the implementation of the system in 3 phases. There's kind of the manufacturing and the build phase. Within that, I had identified probably 4 verticals. One is you've got the storage structure, which is a lot of steel. And we're working with a lot of the Tier 1 steel fabricators that are out there to get that delivered. And then a lot of the Tier 1 engineering companies in the U.S. to deliver the lifts, the inbound and outbound sales that are doing the depalletizing and palletizing, and then manufacture the bots. And we recently set up manufacturing down in Mexico with a Tier 1 engineering company down there who are up and running now and producing bots for us. So there's a build phase. There's in an installation phase where everything comes together on site, and we put it all together, whether that's the structure, directing the cells, and putting up the lifts. And then there's a commission phase. And to oversee all of that and manage that implementation, we've engaged a number of engineering and procurement contractors that help project manage each one of these site implementations. They're all Tier 1 companies, and we've been working with them now for 9 months, seeing a huge amount of success there. So all in all, so far, we're very pleased with the progress that we've made, setting up an initial network of partnerships, good cooperation, good collaboration from the partners, more to do to expand the network, and I'm going to talk a little bit more about that on the next slide. So 3 principal goals really that I'm focused on from an outsourcing perspective with these manufacturers and installers. There's capacity, capability and cost. So you've heard a lot about the sales side of the business. What we're trying to do on the outsourcing and partnership development side of the business is really stay out in front of the sales organization and create enough capacity so that when the sales come through, we've got the capacity there to manufacture staff, get it put up, get it running and deliver it to the customer. We want to be multi-sourced in every one of those areas that I just showed and every one of those verticals, so that we're not reliant on any one single partner or installer or manufacturer. And what we're finding out there at the moment is there's plenty of capacity. One of the great things about the Symbotic system that you could probably see this morning is, every time we implement one of these, we're not doing something different. I often characterize this as saying, one of the things that we're trying to do is implement one of these perfectly and then replicate that dozens of times, if not hundreds of times. And we're finding that as we implement more systems, we're getting better and better and better at the installation, shortening the timelines, compressing the cycle times and doing it a lot cheaper. From a capacity perspective, as we approach partners, we're finding a lot of interest in coming and working with Symbotic. There's a lot of capacity out there at the moment, which is great for us. It's a good time to be out there looking for partners. Some of that is being driven by the fact that Amazon last year cut back on a lot of their long-term plans for building distribution centers and cut back on orders with some of the engineering companies that we're now working with. So that's created an opportunity for us to step in there, leverage that capacity and really build our infrastructure partners. From a goal perspective, what we're looking to do in the very near term is to double our capacity so that we can then really start to scale up the number of systems that we could deliver each year. From a capability perspective, one of the great things that these external Tier 1 partners bring is they've got a lot of experience, and they can really help us think through how do we do this quicker and how do we do it simpler and how do we do it better. One of the things that we're finding and one of the big opportunities that there is for us is the ability to say, okay, once we stand up these manufacturers, they can do a lot more work upstream of the factory that we were trying to do on site, and it was complicating our installation process. So they can take on a lot of those activities upstream when they deliver product to site. It's ready to put together. It goes together very easily in a much shorter time frame, and that helps us compress the overall timeline of the implementation. A lot of these companies can also bring their experience to help us value engineer. What do we mean by that? They can look at the way we do things, how things are manufactured or put together and help us identify opportunities to take cost out while maintaining the same quality standards and the same end product. And we're also finding that as we replicate this and we do more of these and we use the same manufacturers, the same installers, the number of defects in the implementation process is reducing. So one of the things you probably heard us talk about in the past is we want to be a 0 defect organization. And that's particularly true when it comes to supply chain and construction and implementation. What you want to do is really eliminate the need for rework when these things are being put up on site. And we're finding that we're getting better and better and better at doing that. And finally, cost. Okay? Rick said this is a $100 million system. Part of my goal is to figure out, okay, how do we take that cost down. And as we bring more partners into each one of the areas, there's nothing like competition to create the opportunity to drive price down. So part of this is by having more partners in each one of the verticals, then we can get more aggressive when it comes to pricing and bidding and getting partners to really sharpen their pencils when it comes to driving the cost down. A couple of other areas where expanding the network and the base of partners is important to us. One is a lot of these Tier 1 companies have got a much more global reach when it comes to upstream component suppliers so they can reach out into networks internationally in, for example, Asia, and low-cost sourcing opportunities. So we're seeing opportunities to take cost out there. And they can also help us identify areas where we can be more competitive by leveraging our scale and the increase in volume to approach suppliers and say, okay, we want volume discounts now. We're sufficiently -- we've reached sufficient scale to be able to justify going to organizations and going to upstream vendors and saying, we want multiyear deals. We want discounts for the volume that we're bringing to the table. So to finalize, my job is to really build a strong network of partnerships that the organization can then lean into to scale up, deliver more and more systems and do that by developing capacity, capability and reducing cost. Jeff, back to you.
Jeff Evanson
executiveNext up, I'd like to welcome our innovation panel to the stage. Our strategy at Symbotic is innovation. And so no better person to present our innovation panel than our Chief Strategy Officer, Bill Boyd, along with Cristian Mori, our Senior Vice President of Hardware Engineering; George Dramalis, our Chief Technology Officer; and Ted Macdonald, our Symbotic fellow focused on mobile automation. Gentlemen?
Bill Boyd
executiveHello, everyone. We started this afternoon with Rick talking about his audacious goals for where we're going to go and what we're going to do here. I get the pleasure now of introducing you to some of the people who have helped us get here and are going to help us drive this out into the future. As Jeff said, innovation has been a cornerstone of this company since day 1. This has been about, as Rick would say, revolutionary rise in the supply chain, changing things, taking that blank sheet of paper to it. And in order to do that, you have to be creative, you have to have innovation, you have to be able to grow from learnings that come along the way and have great people who can help you do that. So I'm -- without further ado, I'd like to take a minute and just have -- look, I'm going to go backwards actually on this. I'd like to have you guys -- I'm going to have you introduce yourselves a little bit. George, you've been on this ride -- or you've known Rick for a very long time. You've been in warehousing at C&S and prior. You might be the second most knowledgeable person of overall warehouse operations in this company after Rick. What -- talk to us a little bit about your background and what led you to want to be the Chief Technology Officer of this company as we move it forward.
George Dramalis
executiveYes. Thank you. Yes. So I have been with Rick, working for Rick over 12 years now, 13 years. I have -- prior to Symbotic, worked for C&S Wholesale Grocers, and I was the CIO for 10 years there. The interesting fact is C&S Wholesale Grocers were one of the few early adopters of the system. So I was fortunate enough on the customer side to deploy 2 Symbotic systems on the C&S side, one in 2014 and one in 2016, which is -- the latest is Beth IV. In fact, yesterday when we were talking with Cristian and Ted, I said, do you know that I still have the customer interfaces in my one note that I can just compared to what we have today. They're pretty the same, actually, a few more added. But so yes, so I work for Rick for 10 years. I've learned a lot with Rick. I've learned a lot about wholesale distribution, how the stores work, how warehouses work, how the warehouse management systems work, voice systems, you name it. So for me, it was a natural choice at a certain point when Rick offered me to join Symbotic. I said, that's exciting. Let's try it. And I joined Symbotic 3 years ago, I think it's May 15, 3 years ago.
Bill Boyd
executiveBeautiful. And Cristian, you've been in a number of different environments as an engineer and looking at problems and how you're going to solve them. Can you give us a little bit about your background and how this -- you decided this was the place to start to continue to apply that and to continue through it.
Cristian Mori
executiveAbsolutely, Bill. I come from a background of heavy industrial equipment, a lot of automation come from Europe, build equipment over the world. Then I moved here in the States, worked for iRobot, Boston Dynamics, Rivian. And when I met Rick and he showed me the system, this is so unique. So full of unique problems that were so challenging to solve that were encompassing everything that I've done before. Because one thing is building a production line that always does the same thing. One thing is doing a simple equipment that you can simulate to its full extent having spot and moves and so forth. But the ability to handle every case, every situation and be able to do that flawlessly, that was mind blowing. So seeing where the company was and where I could have helped get there with the experience that I had, that was a no brainer.
Bill Boyd
executiveFantastic. And Ted, you're our panels roboticist. Pure and simple. You've also been through this journey for a while here. How have we kept your attention? Why do this here?
Ted Macdonald
executiveYes, yes, so when I started with Symbotic, it was one of the -- that Symbotic was just starting to deploy one of those systems that George was talking about. And I mean you guys saw the system today. From a roboticist who wants to build and deploy robotic systems and have control over the design and have a lot of interesting challenges to work on, there's really no comparison anywhere else that you could go to have such a breadth and diversity of robotics challenges and the opportunity to actually develop it and see your work deployed running in a system like we saw today. And for a lot of engineers who start with our company, it's very quick from somebody starting having an idea, developing it, implementing it and then deploying it and seeing it running at that site in person is something that you can't really get anywhere else.
Bill Boyd
executiveAbsolutely. Okay. With that in mind, let's talk a little bit about what we are deploying. So George, maybe you can give us just a couple of minutes on -- I know many folks have seen it today. Others have been on site before. But give us an idea of how this system all works together and what we build off of when we innovate.
George Dramalis
executiveYes. So I will start it a little bit on a few notes about the Symbotic system. And I know with some of you that I talked today, they ask me these questions, and I was wondering if I should talk about it, but now I know that I should. So some questions that they come into customers' mind when you decide to go with Symbotic system, besides the ROI, besides the cool factor to make warehouse with all the benefits that Mike and the rest of the team shared is, am I going to have good visibility of my inventory? How my people are going to be impacted? How difficult is to implement this? So a few notes on that front. So the Symbotic system is a little city within the warehouse, isolated with its own network and locally run hardware. The interfaces or the communication with the customer is pretty standard, 10 to 12 interfaces. I would say, in the grand scheme of things, this is the least of our worries every time we implement a Symbotic system. Customers can adopt this interface mechanism or these contracts, whatever you want to call them with any messaging system that they have and they can quickly get access to real-time inventory and real-time visibility of our system and our processes. So the system is built within the warehouse. I said because it's a little city. I'm sure as you observed today, the system -- think about a highway that goes in as the inbound, the highway that goes out as the outbound sales. The main straight of the city, the deck. The buffers and the charge station is the parking stations. And then, of course, the houses with the roads are across with all our aisles. So the warehouse for the Symbotic system has all the equipment in the data center. We usually have 2 to 3 racks depending -- racks of standard equipment. All software is proprietary, and we use our off-the-shelf OEM operating systems and databases. So I would call it a warehouse in a warehouse, and we used to call it warehouse in a warehouse because it is really self-hazard. Walmart does not have access to our system. From a cybersecurity perspective, some of you ask me today, we have a local network, even Symbotic system. They go and they log in through VPN and two-factor authentication. And as we communicate with Walmart or other customers, real time, our inventory count and inventory visibility, there is no -- I would not classify it as high risk system in the general scheme of things. So real-time communications, low cybersecurity risk, I would say. So if you think about the system that you saw today, it's system that has 12 to 16 industrial automations, and that is orchestrated with software that is tuning, 5 tuning continuously in seconds and sometimes in milliseconds, all inbound and outbound activity. Inbound activity will not run without outbound activity. And we don't want that to be. All tasks are coordinated. We want a board that goes into it and now to drop a case that from inbound, a picker case for an outbound. So it's orchestrated with custom software that we have full ownership and patent. So 99% of the volume that goes into a Symbotic system is fully automated. That means there is nobody touching that case. 99%. Many times, as you know, with other automations, that we reached a level of 85%, 90%, and they celebrate. We do not. So there is 1% of volume that doesn't go automated. And you've seen some of it, and this volume of cases is manifested as rejects, flaps open. Some of you observed how the cases were rejected in the [indiscernible] where you came with [indiscernible] when I was there. So damaged cases, open flaps and other issues that cause for us not to automate 1% less. Then we are working on that, and we'll speak to that a little bit on further improving that.
Bill Boyd
executiveGeorge, can I just track you from that for one second and try to push a little bit. So as a baseline for the system, obviously, this gives us a platform that we can grow off of. And maybe if we take a little pivot, maybe I can bring Ted in for just a second and we can come back to this. A system is probably -- this gives us the baseline to do it, but it's -- the question that came out today was how robust is this system? How do you really -- how are you using that? And as you innovate off of that, where are you going? So maybe talk a little bit about, Ted, the system, and how it works and then maybe move into Symbotic and we can come back to some of these? Is that good?
Ted Macdonald
executiveAbsolutely. So one thing that's a little different about our system versus a lot of other robotics companies in this space is we're not doing a point solution where you have a bot that you drop into an existing warehouse and it helps move a few cases around. We're looking at the problem holistically and designing a complete autonomous system cohesively together to solve the problem fully end to end. And so what that lets us do is we don't design the bot in a vacuum. We look at the whole thing end-to-end. And then we have lots of different layers of automation that do all this orchestration that George was talking about. So we have the embedded level compute on the edge in the bot. That's doing a lot of the vision algorithms that we've talked about, trajectory planning. It's basically like a driverless car. But then we also build the roads, the city, the stop lights, the whole thing that makes the whole thing run. And so above that, we have layers of AI and algorithms that are figuring out how do you optimize the fleet performance when you have this demand to deliver cases in sequence all these different outbound cells at the same time. You have all this inbound [indiscernible] and you have these 400 bots to get the job done. We've spent years and years iterating and refining these algorithms that bring all this together. And that cohesive solution from the top-level fleet control swarm algorithms down to the embedded in a single company is very rare, and done only at Symbotic. And also that design, and Rick alluded to this a little bit, is that those same problems exist at different scales. And so you saw it today at BreakPack. So we take the basic concepts. You've got to localize a bot. You've got to generate trajectories. You got to do the fleet orchestration and planning and apply it to a smaller scale. And then you can apply it to larger scale or other problems. And it's a very generalizable, flexible way of approaching these problems. And that's what's great about the mobile robots compared with the other traditional automation that Mike talked about with conveyors and cranes. They are purpose built for one thing and pretty inflexible.
Bill Boyd
executiveWell, that's great. And clearly, that platform has been working. It's allowed us to get to where we are today. And we had a question -- I had a question come up a couple of times today. Well, if it worked, why did you guys do this SymBot? Why did you need another bot? But maybe if you could -- I went backwards somehow there, maybe we could use that as a transition. If you could talk about what we put into SymBot. Cristian, maybe you can rip up of that, too, into what that allows us to do within the system as a whole. And George, tell us why we had to do -- why we did this, not had to, but why did we decide to do this? And how is this innovation important for us going forward?
Ted Macdonald
executiveSure. So I'll start. So the challenge for us as an engineering department is not figuring out what to fix, but it's prioritizing like all the potential things we can do to make the system better and expand its capabilities. And at the part of the system is really the bot, right? It's the engine that's driving the cases through the warehouse. And Rick talked about the need for ultra reliability, so that was a huge piece of it. I talked a lot on the tours of how some of the limitations of the previous bot design with respect to the traction control performance or the case sailing capabilities. By unlocking some of those capabilities that let us move into new markets, and enable things like handling tapered totes, which is a prerequisite for BreakPack. So we couldn't have done BreakPack without the SymBot design. It's being able to do cold temperature systems where you need to have really good traction control and trajectory control. And then we also see it as a platform on which that we've really put a lot of thought into the design of the hardware, so that we're going to be able to continuously improve it over time through software deployments and take advantage of the ever-evolving capabilities with vision and AI. And so we really try to build it a platform is something that's going to be flexible and extensible for several years.
Bill Boyd
executiveAnd so I call it sometimes looking around corners. But Cristian, as you guys were looking out to the future, maybe that's a better way to put it and looking at the hardware you're developing, give us a little bit on what Ted gave us some of where we can continue to innovate off of this, but tell us a little bit about the hardware and where that drives.
Cristian Mori
executiveSymBot comes as an evolution of [ BotX ] from [ Bot-7 ] and so forth. So we had a huge learning curve from the early days to today. So what we wanted to do with SymBot is making a platform that is the perfect playground for Ted and everybody else that needs to write software for it because that with the traction control, with the active steering of the [ castoring ] front with the cameras and machine vision capabilities and the extra compute is the perfect platform to grow just with software evolution. Placing new hardware in a warehouse is expensive. You need to replace the whole family and so forth. So we build the extra oomph to be better in the future. So -- and Ted will talk about some of the improvement that we just released that made every software release better. So one example is the, pick-and-place. And we should have a video if you can play it. Ted?
Ted Macdonald
executiveYes. So I talked a little bit about this on the tour. So as Cristian alluded to, initially, when we deployed the SymBot, we didn't have all the software in place to allow the parallelization of all this motion. But the way that we designed the bot, we made it so that we could perform a lot of more parallel operations to limit the amount of time that the robot actually has to be stopped at a shelf to perform a transaction. And this is just one of the ways that we're iterating on the design and improving it to drive fleet performance and reduced bot count. So there's a lot of ongoing development work that we're doing heavily in the software space is to continue to drive the performance of these bots so that we can need fewer bots to perform the same amount of work for the same systems and significantly reduce cost and since we're doing it through all software updates, all the fleets that we're deploying our systems today will benefit from that.
Bill Boyd
executiveBeautiful. All right. So before we let George come back and talk to us, take this to the next logical end, which is the new product BreakPack. Cristian, I thought we could spend a little bit of time here talking about the algorithms -- or Ted you going to talk both to exactly Okay, George. Thank you. Sorry. Why don't we talk a little bit about that George before we get to the new product? And how does this -- this is another base building block. So tell us how this works.
George Dramalis
executiveSo Ultimately, what is the product that Symbotic is producing is a perfectly built pallet that we want to send to the store and that pallet is -- should be sturdy, should be tall, so we can minimize transportation costs. It should be aisle friendly. And what do we mean by that? We want a pallet not to be decomposed in the backroom into different carts. That's what the stores that today. We want the pallet to be ready to go into an aisle and in sequence, the store employee to unbox the products and distribute them into the aisle. This is not as simple. Sometimes an aisle can be multiple departments, sometimes can be multiple aisles one department. So we have been working in a very close partnership with Walmart to enhance this algorithm and enhance our palletization -- optimization that takes into account aisle friendliness, which is the planogram of the store, heavy versus light boxes, product categories that we palletize, crushability of the cases, size of the cases and many other things that we need to take into account in order to produce the ultimate product that is going to go to the store and make the store employees happy and will result in cost savings. So lots of R&D work is happening. We are about, I would say, in a grand scheme of things, 90% there with Walmart. There is another 10% that we have to finish in the next 6 months. But this is one of the coolest and most valuable R&D activities that we have been pushed through in the last 1.5 years, and I think it's going to take another 6 months.
Bill Boyd
executiveAnd so as you look at this overall, this is kind of the baseline building blocks of the system. These are the -- we've talked about a few of the pieces of software here. Cristian, by the way we've been going deep on distributed controls, maybe jump right to what it has allowed us. We've been innovating on that for a year. Maybe we jump to how it's actually allowing us to do different things with our -- as we continue to innovate from here.
Cristian Mori
executiveAs Bill was saying supply chain has been very interesting in the last couple of years. With distributor control, we solved a lot of the problems that generated. We allowed manufacturing to pretest every single equipment. Every single [ 461 ], the different conveyors, the different equipment are stand-alone electrically and controls wise, so they can be tested independently. And that makes the assembly and the commissioning short term. This is one of the strategy that we're using to gain time. As of this allow us to replace components on the fly from one time to another, depending on the supply chain availability. You don't have a drive, you have different aisle blocks. These allow to replace it very quickly. And also allow us to generate a full digital trend. And this is something that is so uncommon in the industry because you can see this level of details in the simulation, for example, in Boston Dynamics on a single machine. But you don't see that a full automotive plant emulated. We're able to digitize everything and pass new features and new capabilities in the virtual space before we deploy it because since our software works with every of our system, will be deploying it toll free to system of Walmart, for example, they want to able to test both positive and negative cases in simulation. And we are doing a lot of work with George and Ted to fully stimulate the entire system, including bots, including software. So we have to do an end-to-end testing.
Bill Boyd
executiveWell, maybe you can help transition us then to the BreakPack conversation. I believe we did a lot of the same work when we were looking at developing break pack, which is allowing us to have to do some very different things there as well, right?
Cristian Mori
executiveBreakPack was developed a fully offline because this -- as you guys have seen, it's the first proof of concept. So we have to develop all the software, all the interfaces tested, and we did it in digital [ tray ]. So we generated a digital several digital [ trays ] because we changed the layout several times. And we found one that was nailing all the requirements that we have. We tested that, we tested with the software, and that was amazing because when we went to deploy it, and we had very few problems. If you were to field where we actually has to [indiscernible] the software inside from scratch, we have been taking a lot longer.
Bill Boyd
executiveWell, George, this is your baby. Can you give us an idea of what it means to have this all together in a minute or so.
George Dramalis
executiveYes. So this is a pictorial view of what you visited today. We went at the back of this gray structure on the left which is the BreakPack system. The blue that you see it's the core system where SymBots travel, put away cases, remove cases to bring them into the BreakPack system. But this is how the integrated BreakPack fits into our Symbotic system. On the left and on the right, you have bots traveling bringing these cases. In this case, as we talked about 99% of the cases, we do not touch them. Until there, this case has not been touched by a human. It's all automated. The only places we touch the case is when the selector opens the case to remove vendor packs or each that places on the mini bots, that's the only place. Again, after that action, we take full out and we move them back into the core system with ultimately palletized them for the store for the outbound cells, which you can see on the right-hand side, the 3 outbound cells again, it's fully automated. The only time we touch the case for a BreakPack is whenever a selector opens the case to place each on the mini bot. So I think -- I thought it was a good high-level overview of how the 2 systems are integrated and working unit. In fact, later on, we will move and we will have more blue on the left side, and that will be the other system, the 3.0 system that is in construction, in commissioning right now. that's how the BreakPack will be between these 2 systems fully integrated.
Bill Boyd
executiveAnd we can try to give this video really quickly, if we could, and then we're going to do a lightning round, so get prepared.
George Dramalis
executiveYes. So this video, I think we saw it in our introduction. Nothing different than what we saw. I think we can skip that. I mean you can see the selector getting the case, opening the case, placing the [indiscernible] on the mini bots and pressing these green lights, green lights are lit whenever the bot comes, I'm ready to take the [ each ] and you can see the mini bots moving away from the selector. And at the end, you will see totes palletized. Another important thing, I know we talked about bots -- SymBots, one of the reasons that we developed SymBots, it was the need for us, a bot to carry a case, and it tote equally well. And right there, we have completed that. And I think we are 100% done with that. There's no doubt about that. Finally, even totes have been palletized with end-of-arm tools in the outbound cells, which is another innovation that came with the BreakPack.
Cristian Mori
executiveThat's also mix totes in case for the same pallet.
Bill Boyd
executiveYes. All right. Let's try to close with -- I mean we talk about having a culture of innovation at this place. Can we -- I'd love to lighting round with you guys 2 or 3 words about what innovation at Symbotic means to you and what we're doing for the future. Yes, you got pleasure starting with.
Ted Macdonald
executive2 were 3 words. I would say rapid innovation.
Bill Boyd
executiveI'll take it. Cristian.
Cristian Mori
executiveThere is a wealth of expertise, especially working with Rick. He has tons of ideas that makes us think and think and think, and we challenge each other. What if we do this? What if we do that, we spend countless hour debating and then we come with a solution, we go execution, which is amazing.
Bill Boyd
executiveIt's more than 3 words. But we'll give it to that's fantastic, George, that calls us out.
George Dramalis
executiveI think we have an organization that is based on trust. People trust each other, they trust each other to challenge each other. They trust each other to cover for the blind spots and from the CEO up to the individual developer open and honest communication and keeping each other accountable.
Bill Boyd
executiveGreat. Well, Jeff, we're going to turn it back to you, look forward to another chance to be here maybe in the future to talk about our next set of innovations. Thanks.
Jeff Evanson
executiveAll right, gentlemen, thank you very much. Well, finance, near and dear to our hearts. We saved the best for last, right? So let me welcome my boss, Tom Ernst, our Chief Financial Officer, to the stage and walk us through some financial plans and outlook and commentary, Tom?
Thomas Ernst
executiveAll right. Thank you, Jeff. It's so much fun to be here in front of you today. So thank you all for coming I hope you had fun today. I reflect back on a little over 2.5 years ago when I first came to this location and saw the Symbotic system. We were still installing the system, so I had commissioning work to do. And I was a CFO of another company looking at my next opportunity and I'd never seen the tech company as cool as this one, and that was before the system was really running. And so hopefully, you saw the same thing I saw today, which is this system here is 3x bigger. It's got BreakPack in it. and it's even so many times cooler than it was 2.5 years ago. So it's just fun to be here. Thank you all for taking time to come here. We appreciate your interest of webcast as well. We appreciate your interest in Symbotic. I'd like to start by just reflecting on what's happened here in the last year at Symbotic. And we got together here a year ago, we had not yet completed our public listing. That was one month away. And we talked about what had happened in the last year. So we had gone from effectively being an R&D company that had under $100 million in revenue. And when we were standing here a year ago, we were almost a $400 million revenue run rate. We're beginning to deploy systems by the multiples in our current generation technology, and we're very excited about our growth prospects. So I think I stood up here last year and said we're thrilled to tell you about how this first year of growth had been and have had ambitious growth plans that we wanted to talk to you about. So this year, what we want to tell you about is those growth plans are working. They're working better than we thought they would. And we grew faster than we thought we would. In our fiscal second quarter, we reported just a couple of weeks ago. We're now over a $1 billion revenue run rate. I think we reflect back to where we thought we'd be in 2023, and we're a good 20% bigger on a run rate basis. So it's quite a bit faster growth. The other thing I think I said last year was Symbotic was a CFO's dream of a company from a financial profile. And what we've seen as the last year has gone by quarter by quarter is that, that dream just crystallizes clearer and clear. What's driving it? while we have expanding gross margin, and we took the opportunity on the success in our first year of operations to go a little bit faster, to invest a little bit more in our product to actually take our gross margins back a little bit to accelerate growth, accelerating our outsourcing opportunity. And since then, we've been expanding our gross margins. And as we look forward, we see multiple drivers for long-term growth. We'll talk about some of those today. We also have very high operating leverage. This stems from our business model whereby we have significantly more investment than our competition in research and development. We have a strong technological lead. We have an outsourcing model that provides us high leverage. And so while we've been able to grow the business with a moderate OpEx growth here in the most recent quarters, we anticipate that continues against very high revenue growth. And then finally, the low capital-intensive nature of our business, very low CapEx requirements along with very favorable working capital dynamics we're going to talk about today have led us to already be cash flow positive over the last couple of quarters and to expect to be cash flow positive for this fiscal year. And once again, as we look forward with revenue growth and scale, we see expanding cash flow profitability long term. So looking -- peeling this back a little bit to look at our financial performance in the first half. I know you've seen these numbers, but just to hit the highlights again. In the first half of this year, our revenue growth is 173% gross margin, expanding a comparable amount of 171%. And EBITDA margins are up from an EBITDA loss rate of negative 28% a year ago in the first half to negative 6% again showing the very high operating leverage. So let's take a step back again. I want to back up to where we were, 2 years ago in our fiscal first half of 2021. So in fiscal 2021, we had just completed the proof-of-concept systems for our current generation of product. We complete those proof-of-concept systems at two of our customers. The first one you saw here, that was that system we toured just today. The second one was completed nearly simultaneously with another customer of ours, Albertsons, near Chicago. So those 2 systems had just been recently completed and were added to the 4 systems that we had from prior generation prototypes and previous generation product. bringing our total of 6 live systems in the customer base together. In the second quarter, as it was clear that we had our product ready to go, we began to launch our current generation product for mass distribution and we launched the first 3 next deployments beginning that build phase that Bill Mines talked about. That was 2 years ago. Last year, we talked about that trajectory from there. And so we're sharing these numbers with you here with a little bit more detail this year. We've grown the number of systems and deployment from 3 in the 2-year ago, 2-quarter period to 9 in fiscal second quarter 2022. You can see they came in a couple of waves where we launched the first few and then we launched kind of a next successive way. But I've talked a little bit about this in our recent financial updates with you on our financial update calls. This last year has seen a continuation of that kind of rapid growth. So we've, again, tripled the number of systems and deployment, active deployment from 9 in the fiscal second quarter '22 to now 28 in the most recent completed quarter. In addition to those 28, 3 of the 9 have since been completed. So what that means is they passed an acceptance test by the customer which means we passed certain performance levels that demonstrate to the customer the system works. The customer then begins to ramp those systems into full production use, and they begin paying us our recurring revenue fees. So we now have 9 total systems up live and running with active customers. This is what's underpinned our growth over time. So you're all familiar with this trajectory. We thought it would be helpful just to break this into a couple of pieces for you to make it a little bit clear. So we divided the revenue to 2 buckets. The green buckets here are showing our current generation system revenue. And then we've shaded the gray buckets, which show you our previous generation revenue, along with our recurring revenue. So you can kind of see what's driven the strong growth from Symbotic. It's those system deployments that's driving the dark green bars. You've heard us comment in the past that prior generation projects often had a very lumpy revenue recognition. That's why you see some very tall bars back in fiscal 2021. It's very common for us that when we're doing a prior generation prototype deployment that we took revenue recognition in one lump at the completion of a project. Our revenue recognition is percentage of completion with our current generation systems. So bringing that all together, this is what underpins our growth, this is what's been the strength of our growth. And as we look forward, the goals of the company are as follows: our founder, Rick Cohen set goal #1, which is deliver braggingly, happy customers. And then I think you've heard the rest of us say as well, goal number 2 is, while we're doing that grow as fast as we can because we believe we have a very large market opportunity, we already have a $12 billion firm committed noncancelable order backlog, and we have a clear over demand situation for our technology to add to that where we choose to -- so our goal is as long as we can deliver those systems and have the customers who are braggingly happy, we want to grow as fast as we can. So how does the model work, let's peel back one layer and talk in a little bit of detail. On the left-hand chart here, we're showing a system gross margin. So we sell the system to the customer. A system can be anywhere from, say, a $25 million system it's modular and scalable in nature like LEGO blocks. So it depends on exactly what size you want and how -- what the configuration is. It might be a larger system like Rick mentioned, could be a $100 million system. There's not really a theoretical limit there. It could be multiples of that if a customer wants to play a very massive system at one time. But our system size is really do range. The customer actually owns the physical system when they purchase it from us. They own the cells, the bots, the structure. But then in order to use the system, the customer must be current on their software subscription or software maintenance in order to have rights to use the hardware. That means that over time, we're adding gross margin to the system over the lifetime. So back to that system revenue. Our structural gross margins, as we think about it, looking at the business that was won up to that $11 billion we had when we spoke a year ago. We see the structural gross margin on the system sales is approaching 30% as we scale and gain efficiency over time. When you add 25 years of recurring revenue stream, in that business we had up to a year ago. We see that lifetime gross margin growing to approximately 40% over time. And that's because of recurring revenue streams have much higher gross margin than the system gross margin. Software being the highest gross margin in terms of -- we see a structural gross margin close to 90%. Operation services such as training or build operate transfer services we provide to our customer and operating their system. We see ramping into the 40s or 50% level, same with our maintenance parts business. The opportunity doesn't stop there though. Since we captured that $11 billion backlog, we've been bringing new customers on. We also have a pipeline of additional customers we're finding that we have a stronger pricing opportunity for those customers. And in particular, we're monetizing that pricing opportunity with higher recurring prices. So whereas we were capturing about a 40% structural gross margin up until a year ago, we now see that in excess of 50% with our current experience. As we move forward, you heard from Bill Mines and you heard from our engineering leaders about how we have multiple opportunities out of the system, not only from the implementation cycle, but from the product standpoint. As those cost reductions come in, we see that as opportunity for us to expand gross margins as well over time. And then finally, moving forward, we license our system to our customers on a throughput rated basis. So as those self-learning engines grow with capabilities and as we come out with future hardware, Snap-on technology, those applications that can add on, those are all future upsell opportunities that further expand the margin we get from any given customer deployment. I'd like to back up and talk a little bit again about the cycle and deployment. So we deploy our technology through 3 phases. Bill Mines outlined this for us earlier today. We have a build phase and installation phase of commissioning phase and a live and then it go live with the customer. Symbotic does get revenue generation through all the cycle. However, the strongest concentration of revenue is in that main installation phase. We continue to get revenue through the commissioning phase again as well, but it's a much lesser revenue generation than when we're physically installing systems. Finally, we passed that acceptance test with the customer where we've proven out basic system capabilities. That's when the recurring revenue starts for our system. And once again, customer must be current on their software licenses in order to use the hardware. Another dynamic that makes as a CFO's dream of a company is that customer by customer and project by project, we've designed the contracts with customers such that each project has a positive working capital throughout the entire life cycle of a project. This is done simply by timing customer invoices for delivery of the system to proceed our outflows of spend for input costs into the build installation and commissioning of the system. This is the primary source for the $700 million plus of deferred revenue we have on the balance sheet and something we expect that will continue to move forward and is a key reason why despite having a negative 4% EBITDA margin in the most recent quarter, we're already cash flow positive and expect to sustain that. The end result of that is we've been able to accumulate cash. We now have a $465 million cash position. That's been increasing, as I mentioned in the last couple of quarters. This provides us tremendous visibility with which to plan our growth tremendous flexibility as we think about the business opportunities as we lay forward our growth plans over the mid and long term. Turning to the operating expenses of the business and our investment. One of the things we're most proud of is our team. And I think Rick made this central to what he wanted to highlight to you today was the talent he's attracted and the talent we continue to track to the organization. We have not only the best people, but we have what we believe is the highest level of investment in automation automating distribution centers in the planet. So while our dollars are comparable with the biggest legacy players that have multiple billions of revenue in the space, unlike them, we have no tech debt. our R&D is pointed entirely a new innovation in the space, and we're not doing with ideas either. So one of the harder things we work on as a team is how do we choose which couple of dozen things we're going to work on so that we can be effective at them. But you bring this together, our $117 million of run rate R&D, we believe is a level of investment that's stronger than our competition while we already have more than a generational lead in technology, something that we think will not only sustain but extend that lead over time and provides us the opportunity without increasing by $1, the ability to sustain and extend that innovation over time. You should continue to expect, though, that we will grow our investment in overhead moderately over time. However, realizing strong leverage against the revenue growth, which we expect to be much faster. We expect a similar dynamic in our SG&A line. So while last year, we got up here and we talked about how we're investing significantly in expanding our SG&A in order to prepare the company for its scaling operations growth. We've seen that growth in SG&A moderate quite a bit. This is because we're beginning to reap some of the early benefits from our big outsourcing push we've been talking about over the last several quarters. We still have significant redundant costs with our partners as we're expanding those outsourcing initiatives that we will realize over time that will help keep the growth moderate here as well. And then as we get on the far side of that transition, and continue to work over the long term with these partners, we see great leverage and having them scale with us, not only to keep our operating leverage high but to advance the technology and provide us longer-term margins, we think, on a net basis. Once again, with SG&A, you should expect us to continue to grow SG&A expense, but at a much more moderate rate than the high growth of revenue we expect as we look forward. Just a couple of comments on stock-based compensation. I've had a few questions about this. We issued grants in 2023 and under our annual equity award program, this represented about 1% of our fully diluted share count. That was at the share price earlier this year. If we had done that at the share price 2 days ago, stocks actually up a little bit today. But if we've done it at the share price 2 days ago, it would have been about 60 basis points of dilution. So I feel like the benchmark is incredibly well relative to tech companies and our comparable ZIP code of market cap. I bring this up because we as a company with a 16-year history, we did take the opportunity to convert many years' worth of long-term incentive plans that we had to RSU-based stock plans. And you're seeing a significant level of stock-based compensation in the near term that's flowing through our GAAP income statement. You should expect that to moderate over the coming several quarters and begin to normalize and reflect something that you would expect to be more consistent with that a 60 basis point type of share dilution that we have in our plan. One other brief comment here, too, and I don't want to get stuck on this too much, but an exciting part of our business model that -- or at least I get excited about as CFO is we have an Up-C structure that enables us to take the tax shield benefit that the company had established as a private partnership before a public listing, carry those tax benefits into the public market and then as those partners look to sell shares in the future, well, that's when you just snap the line for what the tax benefit is. A higher share price means a higher tax benefit. Obviously, tax benefit is only applicable if the company has a tax liability, which we certainly plan to have in the future because we plan on being immensely profitable and much bigger. But with that caveat, if the partners all sold their shares today, which they're not, what they did, this would be almost a $4 billion net tax shield. The agreement that we had with the partners that as part of the public listing is the public shareholders get to keep 15% of that. So that's a $600 million net benefit that goes to offset tax liabilities in the future. And again, that goes up if sales happened at a higher than $25 share price. Once again, excited to be here. I think we're -- I think I was the closer and we're going to bring Jeff back up and perhaps take a Q&A session.
Jeff Evanson
executiveThank you very much, Tom. Now if I could be joined by all of the presenters up on stage management team, come on up. And remember, we do have a webcast audience. So we're going to have a roving mic going around the room. So if you have a question, please raise your hand. We'll bring you the mic and then ask you -- identify who you are and ask a question.
Unknown Attendee
attendeeYou guys talked about adding 1 to 2 customers annually and your outsourcing ecosystem continues to evolve. Do you think when the deployment time kind of shortens, you go back and revisit that 1 to 2 customer number? Or do you think that kind of gives you good line of visibility as you move forward?
Thomas Ernst
executiveMaybe I'll kick that off. So Pierce, our plans are to add 1 or 2 new customers per year here in the near term. Our growth plans do include having more capacity slots for more customers in the midterm plus. However, we're growing so rapidly that we kind of want to talk about that when we get there. But absolutely, to the extent that we're able to compress those installation and commissioning times and gain the benefits of speed of deployment. Those are the kinds of things that enable us to open up more capacity slots and think about more new customers.
Unknown Attendee
attendeeGot it. And you touched on is well capitalized. Maybe talk about the capital deployment priorities here, like 6 months or 6 to 18 months, where do you invest?
Richard Cohen
executiveI'll take that, Jeff. The only thing I was going to say is that 1 or 2 customers might be multiple systems.
Thomas Ernst
executiveRight. Right. Our capital needs are actually quite light. So today, our capital expenditures are extensively some R&D tooling and engineering products that this team over here likes to come up with creative toys they play with as they invent things or really the bulk of it is office products. It's computers and things like that for employees. So that's why you see such a light CapEx number from us today. Larger internal software programs may carry some internal CapEx as well. But again, that will be fairly light. There are things that we could consider in the future that are not part of our operating plans that you've seen recently that could be more capital intensive, but to date, we've chosen to do much of those things that we -- and we talked about some of that a year ago that we may invest in some things. We've actually chosen to expense more of those projects directly and do those with live field deployments rather than internal capital projects. So it's possible that we'll do some more things, but for now, no.
Ross Sparenblek
analystRoss Sparenblek, William Blair. Just kind of thinking about bringing down that production capacity and the time line there. I mean, how should we think like the buckets on the procurement or dual source and supply chain and any time line we can kind of bring that into focus?
Thomas Ernst
executiveMaybe I'll take the first part, and then Bill can take the second part. So one thing we did with procurement is we did want to get out and ensure long lead time components that were challenging the supply chain got locked in a little bit earlier. So we're making sure that we're -- we have adequate supply and inventory and actually locking the specific things like circuit boards and some components that showed problematic is in the supply chain a bit earlier. So that's one adjustment we've made that's been very helpful to us to make sure that we derisk the supply chain.
William Mines
executiveThe only thing that I would add there, we're starting to see the supply chain for some of those long lead time items ease a little bit. And with the partners that we're standing up, the way the model will work is the partners will be out procuring the componentry and using their network. So we expect to get a number of different benefits there. One is scale leverage. The other is shorten the lead time to identify opportunities to diversify some of those componentry sources and then mitigate some of the risks across the stream supply chain.
Thomas Ernst
executiveAnd Bill, one other thing you've been successful so the team has been successful is we've realized shorter installation commissioning times with ourselves alone, but then also with the partners that we're working on already so far.
Bill Boyd
executiveYes. And to reiterate the point that we've made during the course of the conversations this afternoon. I think one of the important things is these partners bring a lot of expertise, a lot of experience, and they're using that to help do work upstream in their factories that we were trying to do on site and that was taking an awful long time and evolving a lot of rework. So as they're learning and they do more and more, they're able to say, okay, there's more that they can do upstream, that helps cut our costs downstream. It compresses cycle times of implementation and installation and that will help reduce cycle time and cost.
Cristian Mori
executiveAnd if I can, one other thing that we did also in engineering is qualifying alternative components, especially for the critical ones. So the supply chain is more breadth to go and choose.
Mark Delaney
analystMark Delaney from Goldman Sachs. Tom, you mentioned all the levers you have to gross margin and how you have drivers for that to improve going forward. I realize steel and other commodities make it hard to predict where gross margin will fall in any given year. But if you assume normalized input cost environment, do you think you'd be tracking ahead of the low 30s gross margin you thought of being achieved in 2025 at the time of your public transaction? Or maybe just give us a sense of where you're tracking on gross margin now with some of these levers relative to that original low 30s, 2025 target?
Thomas Ernst
executiveYes. Thanks for the question. So what's changed for us is we've gained increased confidence in the success of our supply chain strategy. When we began the outsourcing initiative, we weren't certain that it would provide us the same margins, lower margins, higher margins. The primary goal was to make the business scale to be able to deliver more systems over time. So we have gained confidence that we think we can do it at a higher ultimate gross margin long term. Now this is a journey as well. So we've taken the opportunity to move faster. We're doing more innovation in the field, which has had a suppressive effect on our gross margins in the near term. We've put the foot on the gas on moving with more partners and moving faster with them, which has had a similar effect, even more redundant costs and frankly, just more inefficiencies when you're moving that fast. But those 2 things give us visibility that as we take the business forward and with scale they will continue to traject. So bottom line answer is yes, we're excited that we actually believe we will be more profitable in the long run.
Derek Soderberg
analystThis was great. This is Derek Soderberg from Cantor Fitzgerald. Tom, so I noticed that your opportunity that you put out there for the addressable market went up I'm curious what went into that -- and it sounds like you're feeling confident that you have the ability to price in some of the benefits that you're driving with your solutions. I'm curious if that was part of the increase as well.
Thomas Ernst
executiveYes. Thanks for the question, Derek. The primary driver is actually Mike and his team takes a look at and the finance team helps with this. We just -- we provide an accessibility score across the identified potential targets customers in our strategically addressed markets. And as we've thought about our opportunity set with those customers, we feel like there's some significant components that are more open to up to us. So it's less about pricing, and it's actually been more about -- we just feel that our product set now has an in at a little bit higher success rate than we thought a year ago. What hasn't changed is the number of warehouses out there. So they're pretty much where we expected them to be.
Michael Dunn
executiveYes, in particular, there's a few industries that -- if you go back a year, we haven't had as many detailed conversations with potential customers out there. And in the past year, Jason and I have had a chance to engage with a number of those companies that give us a higher confidence about applicability of our technology in some of those industries, which drove the increase.
Derek Soderberg
analystGreat. And then I just have a quick question for Rick. You talked a lot about the robots and the innovation that had that goes into that the robots. But I'm curious if there's another part of the system that you're most proud of, what is that? And which other parts of the system do you think are going to be really tough to replicate for others.
Richard Cohen
executiveThe software. The -- talk about the robots, I talk about the big robots, a little robot, small robots, and so there's tremendous innovation on a chunk of software that goes into the robots that we talk about control software, which Cristian and Ted do a lot of the other software, which George spends a lot of time on is creating -- is figuring out how to make the robots more efficient, whether it's routing or tasking, it's a lot of the software that the self-driving cars use. I think we're -- China stay away from bleeding edge, but we're somewhere between cutting edge and bleeding edge, but the stuff we're doing with -- and because the people we're hiring are saying, here's what the latest thinking from Waymo or Cruise or Tesla or Toyota. So I'm really excited about the work in both areas, but software would be the one that I didn't mention, and I'm very, very excited about that area.
James Ricchiuti
analystJim Ricchiuti with Needham. On the tour, it became apparent that there are other opportunities in the warehouse you talked about. I think you already suggested that there are some opportunities around the loading dock and maybe some other areas? I'm trying to get a sense as to what the philosophy is built versus bought?
Richard Cohen
executiveYou said Bill, Build versus buy as getting it out of this one. We'll both answer it. One of the things that I learned from process of CNS as fast as we grew. We did a lot of acquisitions. We should have been more acquisitive, more aggressive on acquisitions. So I look at some of these products and I'm saying they're really good, but they're not going to be successful because they don't have the discipline that this whole group has to say, no, it's not -- we're not talking about 4 sigma. 4 sigma is not going to get you a successful company. 6, 7 sigma, 1 error per million, 1 error per 2 million is what you need. And so I think there's a lot of opportunities for us to buy companies that would have failed and we can take where they are and transform them with our technology, a lot of software, a lot of hardware and grow very fast. And that, I also think some of those things may be add-ons that we sell, you could sell some of this stuff, you could sell a BreakPack system without a whole system, and that creates more customer activity, more customer interfaces, more opportunities for add-on sales. But Bill does -- I mean, every deal we look at Bill and Tom and me together.
Bill Boyd
executiveYes. Unsurprisingly, we're taking a very similar and disciplined approach to what we did when we built this whole company, right, which is -- we would like to find the right technology that is the right addition to what we're doing. Some of that we will be building. Some of that may be out there already. But we're laser-focused on continuing to deliver as we look at putting more systems in and delivering on the promises we've made and then finding the right balance of what we grow with from here. And yes, we're -- we will be -- we'll be looking at lots of things. We'll also be working internally on everything that we can bring to market in the right way and at the right time.
James Ricchiuti
analystOkay. And if I may, just one final question for me. Just with respect to new customer additions, is there more of an emphasis on thinking, hey, other geographies or other verticals, if you could.
Michael Dunn
executiveYes. So I mean we're stepping through that process. So right now, we're focused on existing verticals in SAM 1, SAM 2 adds vertical. So we'll first go to other verticals in the U.S. In parallel to that, we're having conversations with a number of companies outside of the U.S. And so we would go there, but we consider that the third step in our growth trajectory.
Joseph Giordano
analystThis is Joe Giordano from Cowen. Rick, what's the competitive response been? I know that what you have is different. I've been here several times, and it's amazing to see, but it's a $0.5 trillion TAM that you're suggesting in SAM 3, and I can't imagine that your competitors are just going to let you take it all. So like what -- what are they doing? And yes, well, let's just start there.
Richard Cohen
executiveYes. So we're -- so it's interesting. Mike could share this. We're seeing no new competitors. We run into Witron on some sites Knapp is mostly focused on e-commerce. So we're not running into them. Dematic is struggling in a lot of areas. So -- so to some extent, we've created a new space, which is all these retrofits, and to some extent, people that we were competing with are now much more willing to cooperate with us and maybe do build-to-suit kind of things that would be good partners for us. So Amazon hurt a lot of people in this cut back. And so people are making a decision, do I cut back overhead because a sales cycle for some of those guys is 3 years. So it's -- we're not -- I'm always looking over my shoulder and I'm only paranoid as people are chasing us, but we're not seeing a huge amount of competitive response. Walmart made it clear, don't call on us. And if anything, we're seeing small startups saying, maybe we should be talking to you about, can you help us get into Walmart, which may lead into a discussion of for you just bias. So I think we're seeing that. But the Witron is very well financed. They're out there, never want to minimize them. They kind of started this warehouse automation. They're good. They're limited in what they can do. They can't do what we can do. But they're out there, and they're very big in Europe.
Joseph Giordano
analystAnd when you look at your potential market out there, how do I don't know if people -- how do you think about their willingness -- the potential customer's willingness to like wait long enough for you to even be able to deploy the technology for them because people aren't going to wait 10 years to do something they know they need to do now. So how do you think about?
Richard Cohen
executiveYes. So we are -- so what Bill has generally said, but not as aggressive as I would is we are working -- we are no longer qualified -- I'm very focused on inventory. I came from a world where inventory was everything. You didn't want to have any leftover Pac-Man cereal. You didn't want to have any leftover [ Parel ]. You don't want to have any -- So I came from that wholesale grocery business, where inventory management was everything. That being said, we are gearing up not to build to suit. We are gearing up to build inventory because we can sell everything we can build. So we are very, very focused on changing our model and we will be able to -- nobody has ever built 40 systems in a year. The most that any of these guys have ever built, whether it's Dematic, Witron is 10 as far as I know. And we'll build -- we will get to 40. We will be surpassing them sales-wise probably next year. So our answer is we're going to build systems faster. We don't know how fast yet, and we're going to have to figure out how to build inventory. We're going to have to get better controls on inventory, but that's the answer.
Joseph Giordano
analystTom, when exactly do they get into 40?
Greg Palm
analystRight. Greg Palm from Craig-Hallum. Over here. It's a 2-part question. It's clear that you've got lots of growth opportunities. You talked about penetration of existing customers, new verticals, new customers, new geographies. How do you prioritize each of those? And then the second part to that, maybe for Tom would be how do you balance profitability off of those versus the investment that's required to go after some of that.
Thomas Ernst
executiveDo you want to take the first.
Michael Dunn
executiveYes. So in terms of priorities, that's the purpose of us laying out the SAM-1, SAM-2, SAM-3. So we're first prioritizing continuing to penetrate existing customers that want to do more. So we have active conversations with every one of those customers about doing more Second priority is expanding into new verticals, really into the SAM-2, which will expand the verticals that we're focused on. And then third would be the geographical expansion. So those are the -- those are -- that's how we've laid out the priorities. Now that being said, we also have constant conversations internally amongst the leadership team as we have opportunities to get to the point where they're ready to move forward, which is how do we maximize the value creation for us as well. So who are the right new customers. Our priority is to add customers that want to build many sites with us versus customers that want to build one site and then strategically looking at who are the right sort of beachhead, new customers in new verticals and new geographies that help us expand into those spaces.
Thomas Ernst
executiveAnd I'll say a couple of things about profitability. So we're intensely focused on maximizing the net present value of our future stream of profits at the company. So we intend to be profitable, we intend to really take advantage of our opportunity. We also find huge value in being a disciplined operator of the business and driving towards increasing performance as well. So those are both important values that Rick has really instilled in the company to come from him as a cultural direction. So you should expect us to be focused on delivering both.
Robert Mason
analystYes, it's Rob Mason with Baird. This last quarter, Tom, you had a book-to-bill of 1. Your backlog really didn't change, but you didn't book any new customers. And it appeared that because of the performance, you were able to see more revenue in the future. I'm just curious, within the existing backlog, how much more performance opportunity resides in that current backlog?
Thomas Ernst
executiveYes. Thanks for the question, Rob. They're significant -- so as we talk about backlog, we're talking about the accounting definition of remaining performance obligation. So there definitely is some variable performance upside to the backlog as we move forward, but it's also the appropriate way to think about measures. We, as a company, intend to drive the cost of our system down, right, over time. We -- there's certainly variable consideration that we have in our contracts that don't get included in backlog that you may not earn, right? So that's -- those are the primary reasons why there may be some upside outside of actual new bookings that drive backlog growth or moderate backlog depletion.
Robert Mason
analystAnd just as a follow-up there. Again, if you think about your system gross margin today, use the example, $50 million system, just 30% gross margin or just below that. So relative to the target where we are today, what would be kind of the 1 or 2 big movers to get closer to that target gross margin and when we might see those?
Thomas Ernst
executiveYes. 2 biggest movers, and these are something that are going to come over time are, first, we have a significant amount of infield product that we're delivering to customers that -- and you've seen it here today on your tours that are being field tested. They're effectively field proof of concepts. It's our ninth major platform release our autonomous SymBot. We're delivering that you saw them running in multiple levels of the system here. They're running in multiple sites out of our customers today. We also saw BreakPack. That's that product as well. We're delivering. It's a proof of concept that we're delivering with their customers. So when we deploy technology like that, those do not bring the same gross margin contribution as our finished current generation product. And those are very significant levels of revenue generation for us today because we're moving significant quantities of those in the recent periods. So as we move forward, we'll probably continue to have programs like that, but perhaps not at the same rate we have here in the recent time frame. And particularly as we think about it in the near term, those will moderate a little bit. The second thing we have that's clearly visible that will provide us some uplift is we have multiple sources of redundant costs associated with our supply chain initiative. While we're ramping up first and then second and third partners across multiple areas that Bill Mines walked us through. We have redundant procurement teams, we have redundant operations teams. We have knowledge transfer efforts. We have engineering efforts, we have system efforts that are adding some redundancy to the cost as well. A lot of that gets carried over in the -- some goes in OpEx, but a lot of that gets carried over into COGS as well that acts as a depressant effect in the nearer term on gross margin. Those 2 are actually bigger than steel. And I know we've talked about steel last year because steel was at a very high level. As I think you're all aware, steel for any long-term contract we have with the customer is a pass-through cost for us. That means that we're going to get the same gross profit dollars. But when steel is at an elevated level like it has been, again, the last 3 or 4 months, that elevates our revenue and elevates our COGS, which takes down our reported gross margin. That's a couple to a few hundred basis points of impact relative to what the longer run, say, the 10-year average steel index would be. So that's a third tier effect that's not insignificant either.
Jeff Evanson
executiveOkay. Well, thank you, everyone, for the excellent questions. Are there any other questions we have maybe just a minute or 2. All right. Excellent. Thank you, everyone, for joining us today. Thank you for the management team for their excellent work, and thank you very much to my colleague, [ Kim Minkowski ], who made this event run on time smoothly and professionally. So thank you to her as well. And for those in the room, the bus is available, take it to the airport. So don't forget your bag out the door to your left, take a right and the bus will be right out there. So thank you again for coming.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Symbotic Inc. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Symbotic Inc. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.