Thales S.A. (HO) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
July 12, 2023
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Operator
operatorGood morning, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to today's Thales acquires Cobham Aerospace Communications to strengthen its Avionics portfolio conference call with Yannick Assouad, Executive Vice President, Avionics; and Pascal Bouchiat, Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer. [Operator Instructions] I must advise you that this conference is being recorded today. I would now like to hand the conference over to Mr. Bertrand Delcaire, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.
Bertrand Delcaire
executiveHello. Good morning and welcome and thank you for joining us on such short notice. This morning we will discuss the announcement regarding Cobham Aerospace Communications, AeroComms in short and I suggest we stick to the shorter name. I am Bertrand Delcaire, the Head of Investor Relations at Thales. With me today, Yannick Assouad, Executive Vice President, Avionics; and Pascal Bouchiat, our CFO. The presentation will be in English and followed by a Q&A session as explained. It is webcast live on our website at thalesgroup.com and the slides and the press release are also available for download. A replay of the call will be available as from tomorrow morning. With that, I would like to turn over the call to Pascal Bouchiat.
Pascal Bouchiat
executiveThank you, Bertrand. And good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us on this call. So starting this presentation with Slide 2. I'm very delighted to announce that Thales has signed a memorandum of understanding with Cobham Limited owned by Advent International to acquire AeroComms for enterprise value of $1.1 billion. AeroComms is a leading supplier of advanced ultra-reliable safety cockpit communication systems and Yannick will explain in a minute what they exactly do. It will enable Thales Avionics to establish itself as a leader in the very attractive and fast-growing cockpit communications and connectivity markets. With this acquisition, Thales aims to pursue its strategy to strengthen its Avionics portfolio, reinforcing its global leading positions, adding recently developed cutting-edge products to its portfolio while consolidating its solid positions with major OEMs and gaining access to strong aftermarket/retrofit opportunities. AeroComms, which is expected to generate around $200 million in revenue this year, also has a very attractive financial profile; double-digit type of growth expected in the midterm and solid operating margin and hence significantly accretive to our aerospace segment profitability. From a value creation standpoint, this transaction is also compelling. The acquisition enterprise value of $1.1 billion represents 17x expected full year 2023 EBIT presynergy and 15x expected full year 2023 EBIT post run rate cost synergies. This multiple reflects AeroComms' superior growth profile and is consistent with comparable these multiples. The team have already identified run rate pretax net cost synergies of around $10 million and incremental revenue synergies of up to $40 million. This deal will be EPS accretive from year 1. So after this brief introduction, let me now turn over the call to Yannick, who will tell you more about AeroComms and the strategic rationale for the deal. Yannick?
Yannick Assouad
executiveThank you, Pascal. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for being with us today with short notice as we said. I am now on Slide 3. As Pascal explained, AeroComms is focused on aircraft safety communication system. It has 3 main product families; L-Band Satcom systems dedicated to cockpit communication, digital audio and radio management solutions and passive antenna system; all enabling connectivity, communication and navigation of an airplane. It serves a broad set of customers both civil and military and benefit from both OEM production ramp-up and significant retrofit opportunities. It benefits from strong growth opportunity driven by 2 clear pillars: the market itself, as you know, we are in a period where we have ongoing OEM delivery ramp-up; but also from a wave of operating fleet retrofit opportunity; and product themselves, this growth is also fueled by the recent launch of state-of-the-art products. Aviator-S for L-Band Satcom, it is today the best-in-class product already adopted by major OEMs like Airbus and Dassault and brand new DRAIMS, which is a digital audio/radio communication system also adopted by Airbus. And thanks to this unique position, its 2023 sales are on track to be already above pre-COVID level. Overall, we expect it to sustainably grow at double digit thanks to these new products and above market growth meaning gaining market share. On top of superior growth, AeroComms is also generating robust profitability and will thus have an accretive impact on our Avionic business and group margins. Moving now to Slide 4. So Slide 4 provides more detail on each of AeroComms 3 main product lines. Let me just stress here the first column, Satcom. AeroComms address a major trend in safety critical cockpit communication, namely the replacement of low bandwidth HF solution by L-Band, Inmarsat, Satcom. Its product, Aviator-S is already very well adapted to this market, being very compact and low cost. Looking at the narrowbody fleet in service today, we expect the penetration rate of L-Band Satcom to increase from around 20% today to 50% to 60% in the coming 3 to 4 years driving a major retrofit opportunity. Moving now to Slide 5. The reason of the strategic move for us is really the trend on connected cockpit, which is really at the heart of the future of aviation. At our ESG Investor Day back in 2021, I had stressed how the principle of air traffic management are strictly based on pre-authorized routes that follow the location of [indiscernible] dating back to the middle of the 20th century. Optimizing flight trajectory and airspace operation is a major CO2 reduction opportunity for aviation and connected cockpits are essential technology to deliver on this vision. It's a clear enabler. Actually this requires 2 key technologies; a permanent secure high bandwidth connectivity, powerful cybersecurity across the full connectivity spectrum and digital audio and radio management inside the cockpit. This technology opens a use case opportunity beyond flight operation opportunity. For example they allow the introduction of digital solution to reduce crew stress and workload. In the longer term they support the introduction of increased automation in the cockpit for improved safety. Moving to Slide 6. And this is where the combination of our current Avionics business and AeroComms is really a perfect match to address this opportunity. AeroComms brings L-Band Satcom, digital audio/radio control and audio navigation antenna;, strongly complementing our portfolio in glass cockpit computers, navigation and cybersecurity. And you have on the slide what is the current status of an airplane today and where we will be moving in the near future and near is clearly not long term, way before the end of the decade, to really allow what I said in terms of optimizing route of any plane on the planet. Moving now to Slide 7. Slide 7 is another way to illustrate the strength of the combination. You have a cockpit in front of you and clearly you see what actually Thales provides in terms of glass cockpit navigation, computer and cybersecure line and you see on the top what Cobham AeroComms is providing today. And clearly, Thales and AeroComms will be in a position to provide a full range of cockpit solution for a fully connected avionics offering with the integration of AeroComms DRAIMS, their digital audio/radio management system with Thales FlytX cockpit display system, which is already a reality on some platform like the [indiscernible] program. Thales audio navigation solution will be effectively supported by AeroComms antenna portfolio. And last, but not least, AeroComms' Satcom Aviator-S with the connection with Inmarsat and Thales FlytLINK Satcom Iridium, which we are developing right now could lead to the best-in-class redundant Satcom solution. So strategic fit is really built on the unique state-of-the-art product portfolio of both companies. With that, I will now hand over to Pascal, who will comment on synergies and the financial impacts of the transaction.
Pascal Bouchiat
executiveOkay. Thank you, Yannick. So I'm now on Slide 8, cost and revenue synergies. So starting with cost synergies on the left. The team estimates that the combination will generate run rate pretax net cost synergies of around $10 million representing 5% of current sales and is driven by the usual levels. Consolidation of Thales Avionics Satcom and audio and radio control activities within AeroComms. R&D efforts and technology road map alignment, some level of vertical integration and purchasing optimizations as well as convergence in support and spares and repairs activities. We forecast that the vast majority of these run rate cost synergies will be achieved by the end of 2026. We have already identified meaningful revenue synergies. First estimates correspond to a run rate of around $40 million in incremental revenues. As usual, with revenue synergies, they will take a bit more time to materialize as they will notably depend on product development road maps. Still around half shall already capture in 2027. All these positive effects resulting from the combination will improve the cost profile and EBIT margin of Thales Avionics and the group overall. So moving now to Slide 9. I already mentioned the transaction terms. Let me stress here that because of its superior growth profile, the valuation multiples are slightly above Thales. Beyond being financially compelling and the strong strategic rationale detail by Yannick, this acquisition will offer significant shareholder value creation potential. As the transaction is paid in cash, it's expected to be EPS accretive from year 1. This transaction abides by all the M&A criteria that we have articulated with Patrice over the past few months strengthening one of our core businesses with an easy to integrate acquisition. This is really a plug-in approach that we mentioned previously. A deal that will clearly reinforce our technology portfolio with state-of-the-art products. A transaction that is accretive to our financial profile looking at both revenue growth and also profitability. And of course valuation that is consistent with its financial profile in line with our disciplined capital deployment strategy. So I will finish the presentation with highlights of the timetable and next steps. I'm now on Slide 10. So transaction signing is subject as usual to Works Council consultation processes at both Thales and the target science. Closing will be subject to customary merger control and regulatory approvals as well. Under these conditions, closing of the transaction is expected sometime during H1 2024. So this concludes our presentation. Many thanks for your attention. And together with Yannick, we now welcome your questions.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] And your first question comes from the line of George Zhao from Bernstein.
George Zhao
analystI guess first is on the margins. The financial valuation I think that implies close to 30% margins. Are there unique commercial contract types that has allowed this business to generate that level of margins and how sustainable is that going forward? And second one on the top line regarding this double-digit medium-term growth. How do you think of that in terms of the market growth versus your share gain versus new products? Because certainly we're in an environment where, as you said, we're seeing ramp-up in OE production, aftermarket growth already in the market. So how do you distinguish that versus I guess the growth premium you expect in this business?
Pascal Bouchiat
executiveOkay. George, maybe I will start with your first question and then leave the floor to Yannick to complement and maybe to discuss about any top line growth. And we mentioned getting market share and why we believe that this business will grow a bit quicker than the market. So I guess, George, that you run the math and I guess your assessment of profitability is clearly correct. What we need to have in mind is that AeroComms really have developed a state-of-the-art and unique type of products with quite a strong position at key audience. So it's really the unique situations in terms of products that allows also this type of margin, first point. Second point, what is also quite important to consider and this is presented, I guess it's on Page 3 of the presentation. You will notice that the aftermarket and retrofit proportions is quite significant representing almost 50% of AeroComms. And as we highlighted and as we all know, of course level of margin on aftermarket and retrofit is significantly above what it is on linefits. So this is really what is underpinning this quite favorable level of profitability, which we do believe is sustainable here again driven by new products that have been developed in the last few years both on high bandwidth Satcom, but also on the digital radio and audio. Maybe Yannick will comment a bit about the development of those 2 new products that are really quite unique in terms of their positioning as compared to the overall competition. Yannick, maybe on this point?
Yannick Assouad
executiveYes. So to complement what Pascal said. First of all, the sales today of AeroComms is based on one, their legacy product that they produce for linefit and they maintain them. And recently they introduced those 2 new products that I described, the Satcom the L-Band Inmarsat Satcom and DRAIMS, and progressively those 2 products are going to replace the legacy product. So that's one. And they have better margin on those new products than they had on the former one. That's one explanation of the sustainability of this margin. The other one is that on Satcom and you see it again on Slide 3, you see that the Satcom is only today 30% of their sales. That share is going to increase vastly because today, as I said, certainly a small percentage of airplanes that are equipped with high bandwidth communication equipment and we see it coming on line fit. There is more and more airlines that ask for Satcom communication on their new airplane. And in addition when usually they ask for communication in their new airplane, they are going to want to retrofit their legacy fleet. So there is a huge potential of retrofit of fleet of airplanes with this Satcom product. So really you'll see the share of Satcom growing in the coming years and it so happened that they have also better margin on the Satcom itself and the audiocom. So that's really the reason why it is very dynamic in terms of growth potential and that's why we believe as well that their current very attractive EBIT profile can be sustained in the future.
Pascal Bouchiat
executiveMaybe to complement, George, if you allow. On top of this overall positioning with the right products, it's also the fact that clearly AeroComms is a well-managed business. They managed to drop their overall cost structure in particular throughout the COVID '19 crisis. They have put in place quite a significant optimization of their industrial footprint and it's clear that as they see -- and this has really started. Maybe we mentioned that the level of revenue in 2023 is expected to be above the pre-COVID level. So they are now taking advantage of this overall leverage effect with low cost and taking advantage of quite a strong top line revenue. So this also explains this level of margin. In terms of superior level of growth, I guess Yannick started to mention at this point with in particular the Satcom and also some developments also driven by this changing regulations that opens the door for increase of Satcom solutions on airplanes. So overall, yes, we do believe that this superior level of costs reflects the quality of the portfolio and this level of margin reflects both this unique positioning from a product standpoint, but also the aftermarket component and also the overall cost structure of AeroComms, which has been well streamlined in the recent past.
Operator
operatorAnd your next question comes from the line of Tristan Sanson from BNP Paribas.
Tristan Sanson
analystCongrats for the deal. A few on my side. Can you first talk about the track record of execution and supply chain management at AeroComms? Is there anything we should focus on in the first stages of integration on this point? Second one, can you tell us a bit more about the track record on top line generation especially what was the pattern of revenues generation throughout the crisis? How much did it drop? How fast did it recover? How cyclical was it? And when you're talking about double digit going forward, double digit can be anything from 11% to 99%. So are we talking about more like 10%, 12% or 15%, 20% or what's the type of that? And maybe third one would be are the technology synergies that you're seeing for the Thales Group beyond cockpit avionics?
Yannick Assouad
executiveOkay. I'll start with the supply chain question if I may. There is a difference between Avionics as it stands today and then the fact that they are much more vertically integrated. We are not as vertically integrated as they are and clearly we had less visibility on the inventories that our Tier 1 had an electronic components that they have themselves because they are procuring direct because they are building everything either in France or in South Africa including the printed circuit board they make themselves. So this is coming much earlier and they managed it very well to such a point that they had no major untimed delivery performance during the worst of the component crisis for us, which was let's say end of '21 to mid '22, which was really the period in which we had many decommitments from all the component manufacturers. But they had inventory prior to that period and therefore, they were able to navigate that period of 6 to 10 months, which was really bad for all the electronic manufacturers. They were able to navigate it much better than we did. And clearly today, the fact that they are very vertically integrated helps tremendously both the management of their supply chain which is not as deep as ours, but also their cost I must say as well. So clearly it's value-added. Do you want to answer the...?
Pascal Bouchiat
executiveYes. About the sales portfolio, Tristan. So yes, of course AeroComms as all aerospace companies have been affected by the crisis, but this being a very temporary impact. When you look at their top line profile, 2020 was around 20% below pre-COVID level or below 2019. But in 2022 they have already fully recovered, which is good. So 2022 very close to the pre-COVID level in terms of top line showing how quick they managed to get this level of rebound. And we expect 2023 to be probably double digits above pre-COVID level. So you see a level of impact for the cost, which has been quite modest and quite a swift recovery in terms of top line and today a level of 2023 expected to be significantly above pre-COVID level. Now going forward and for the reason that Yannick mentioned, we are quite positive. So what does it mean in the next few years? I would consider that a low teens to mid-teens target is basically what we might have in mind for the next few years, which you see is pretty good and which is above market trend on this matter.
Yannick Assouad
executiveAnd another question on further product synergies. Clearly I described the main synergy and really the fact that our product lines are very complementary between what we do in Avionics and what they do in communication and connection of the cockpit, cybersecure communication of the cockpit. So we have synergies of sale associating the 2 programs. We have synergies of cost because, as you know, moving forward to have secured info going to a connected cockpit, you will have to have redundancy in the communication. So in the years to come, probably it will be a dual Satcom that will be needed both Iridium and Inmarsat to cover the entire earth. And clearly we see synergies since on our side, we have further progressed on the Iridium Satcom and we have further progressed and already producing Inmarsat Satcom, which is why they were ahead of everybody in the market and they pick as a consequence a good market share. But to come clearly, this communication channel would have to be redundant and this is where there is a lot of synergy because there we are starting an Iridium development so there's a lot of synergy there. Do I see further synergies? Clearly we didn't look at what it could give in the cabin. And will there be one day communication for the airplane globally, cabin plus cockpit? It's a big question mark, Tristan, because of the safety matter of the cockpit communication. But clearly a future that we need to watch of course.
Tristan Sanson
analystOkay. That's fair. But you're not talking about like synergies with the rest of the group's portfolio like Thales Alenia Space or the defense business and after all those years they can commit?
Yannick Assouad
executiveClearly the connectivity expertise is also very important as well for all our defense businesses. Clearly they are specialized in airborne system and therefore it's probably more towards our defense business on airplane rather than on-ground equipment that there is also synergy with the rest of Thales. And the synergy with Thales Alenia Space is already something that we are taking benefit already in Avionic and they will benefit from that clearly. Having a link with satellite business is useful when you talk about Satcom connectivity.
Operator
operatorAnd your next question comes from the line of Ben Heelan from Bank of America.
Benjamin Heelan
analystI wanted to ask a couple. Firstly, who do you think of as the big competitors in this space? Is it Honeywell or are there other people that we need to be thinking about? Secondly, do you think or do you foresee any potential risks from a regulatory process just that you're going into that process quite confident that you're not going to need to make any remedies, et cetera? And I think Pascal, for my third question, you mentioned for the revenue synergies, I think you said around half by 2027. That seems to be quite a significant digestion period. So why are you not able to cross-sell aftermarket, upsell aftermarket, leverage the product from a revenue synergy perspective earlier than 2027?
Pascal Bouchiat
executiveOkay. Maybe I will let Yannick answer the first ones and I will answer the last one.
Yannick Assouad
executiveThe main player in this arena is Collins so actually it's not Honeywell. It's Collins that have -- Collins, I don't know if you recall, but has acquired ARINC as you said in the U.S. like 10 or 12 years ago and they started the communication on ARINC standard -- the cockpit communication on ARINC standard that was very low band. But they are in this field since the acquisition of ARINC. When the era of satellite communication started, of course Collins looked at it and clearly decided to invest in the Satcom and they are developing an Iridium Satcom module right now as we speak. It so happened that AeroComms took a position earlier than Collins, but Collins is the main competitor in that type of communication today.
Pascal Bouchiat
executiveOn regulatory issue, at this point we don't see anything specific in this matter, Ben, and of course we have to be a bit cautious. But nothing specific to report on this aspect.
Yannick Assouad
executiveAnd maybe to add, the reason why we are not seeing any big hurdle is that today our sales and we need little sale on Satcom equipment because we were in the process of developing our equipment, but we have no significant sales today in that arena. So clearly we don't see any major hurdle because we are not very present today on the Thales side.
Pascal Bouchiat
executiveNow on the revenue synergies, yes, my message was that it was more back loaded than front loaded. And so that when we discuss about synergies, of course we are very clear maybe on the short term on the cost synergies because it's a bit easier. And of course as any acquisitions and I guess that we have demonstrated our ability to get cost synergies on previous transactions, of course there is no issue in this matter. Hence I mentioned that by the end of 2026, we'll have executed virtually all our cost synergies. This on the assumption that closing will take place in H1 2024. Now revenue synergy, of course we are always a bit more cautious. Of course we'll not wait until 2027 by definition. Now what you also need to do is that we will of course develop cross-selling, upselling as quickly as possible and this will start quite quickly. It's more about when it comes to going to the market with combined offering where it takes of course a bit more time. So yes, we might be a bit cautious in terms of timetable for revenue synergies. But once again it's not just in our hands, it's also product development, it's also relationship with customers and the fact that I guess it makes sense for us to be a bit on the safe side on this matter, Ben.
Yannick Assouad
executiveAnd product certification -- product development and certification. We are in the civil aerospace. You know that everything needs to be certified and it takes usually 3 players to certify something; the equipment manufacturer, the aircraft manufacturer and the authority either EASA or FAA. And then for retrofit it takes an STC, a supplemental type certificate, so that we need to get from the authority and that has a lead time that you can't announce clearly whether it's days or weeks. So that's why we are a little bit cautious as well.
Benjamin Heelan
analystOkay. That was super clear. One quick follow-up. You mentioned the business is very vertically integrated. That's one of the reasons they managed so well through the pandemic. Is that something that you're going to look to keep or do you think that you are going to change the supply chain strategy on this business more in line with how you do the rest of Avionics?
Yannick Assouad
executiveTo tell you the truth, clearly we are going to keep it because in terms of Thales given what happened in '21 and '22, we are looking at our own model of industry I must say and AeroComms as a different model of industry that was more finally sustainable navigating the supply chain crisis we are going through. And still today the component crisis -- the electronic component crisis is behind us, but we are in front of a mechanical component crisis right now. And clearly we see them navigate a bit better than we do in those crisis and those are the big questions that within Thales ourselves, we are asking the question. So clearly for them, we are going to keep it for the time being and use their experience to fuel our thinking on our industry model ourself.
Operator
operatorAnd your next question comes from the line of Christophe Menard from Deutsche Bank.
Christophe Menard
analystI have 2 questions. The first one is on R&D. If my memory is right, it's a pretty R&D intensive activity. So the question is where are you in the R&D phase? You mentioned the Iridium development so what will be essentially the cost of developing such a solution for AeroComms? And the second question is can you comment on the free cash flow performance? Again any R&D capitalized and what is the conversion of this division?
Yannick Assouad
executiveOkay. On the R&D, clearly it's R&D intensive. Like any aerospace product, civil aviation product; you need not only to develop the product, you need to certify it. So it's R&D intensive. By the way out of their total [indiscernible] like Thales, their model is that they work with a large engineering group clearly to develop those products. So the great thing about it is that the Aviators-S is of course fully developed and fully certified so this is behind them. They had barely started their Iridium Satcom development. We are further progress on that one on our side and we are going to eliminate clearly 1 of those 2 developments. I cannot tell you which one yet. It would require further analysis that we won't be able to do before we close the deal. But clearly this is what we foresee and therefore, they will probably slow down their Iridium development or not start it fully as it is not started as we speak. So clearly it's helping their R&D cost by a substantial amount as it takes several tens of millions to develop a Satcom product.
Pascal Bouchiat
executiveOkay. Christophe, maybe on the free cash. So yes, it's a solid cash flow contributor. Having in mind that as this is more a business of sales of recurring products more than a prefunded type of project as we have in defense, we also need to consider that growing this business will require a bit of additional working capital, first point. In terms of overall level of CapEx, it's a business where overall the level of CapEx represent between 2% and 3% of the revenue. Probably it's going to be a bit more in the first 2 years as we'll spend a bit more CapEx in order to take -- to deliver on our synergies. For instance there will be CapEx on IT system. So a bit more CapEx in the first 2 years. Now when you put all of that together, I would consider that based on CapEx that would be slightly above D&A and also a bit more additional working capital, probably 85% to 90% of EBIT converted to -- 85% to 90% of EBIT conversions of course based on unlevered and pretax cash flow would be what I have in mind, which means that post-tax unlevered, it will be probably 60% to 65% of EBIT. This is what I've got in mind overall for this business. So overall, post-tax probably around 25% of pretax profit. So post tax unlevered, 60%, 65% conversions ratio based on what I've just mentioned, a bit more working capital as we grow the business and probably at least the first 2 or 3 years for a little bit of CapEx that will be exceeding the level of D&A.
Christophe Menard
analystJust a follow-up if I may. There is no R&D capitalized I would assume from this and what is the typical R&D as a percentage of sales? Is it between 10% and 15% or is it below 10% and does it change anything to your group level R&D as a percentage of sales guidance in the future?
Pascal Bouchiat
executiveNo. Even though the level of self-funding revenue is not something I want 10% to make.
Yannick Assouad
executiveIn Avionics, it's around 10%.
Pascal Bouchiat
executiveAnd this business is also pretty much at this level. So it doesn't change that much the overall level of self-funding R&D for Avionics and overall at group level considering the size of acquisition, it will not change the overall I would say R&D trajectory expressed as a percentage of volume. It will not be material in terms of self-funded R&D as a proportion of Thales level of revenue and no specific capitalized R&D.
Operator
operatorAnd your next question comes from the line of David Perry from JPMorgan.
David Perry
analystI've got 3 questions. They're all really on the same theme. They're for you, please Pascal. The first one is are you financing this from your gross cash or are you going to take on some debt? The second question is it would be quite helpful given what's going on in capital markets, could you just update us on what you think your current average interest rates are on your cash and on your debt? And then lastly, to help us judge the accretion, can you tell us what you think your net interest expense or income is both pre- and post the deal, please?
Pascal Bouchiat
executiveSo it will be funded through available cash on our balance sheet so we don't plan to raise any debt to fund this acquisition. Overall you could consider that interest rate today at Thales is 3.5%. We raised a bond a few weeks ago with a coupon of 3.62%. So overall this is what I can share with you. And pre- and post interest expenses overall at Thales, I don't have it on top of my mind. But to have a good -- I would say a good rule of thumb in terms of computing I would say the interest expenses associated with this acquisition, I think taking into account 3.5% of the acquisition price will give you in my view quite a good understanding of the impact on our financial expenses, P&L lines and allowing you to calculate the overall accretive bottom line impact of the acquisition.
Operator
operatorAnd your next question comes from the line of Aymeric Poulain from Kepler.
Aymeric Poulain
analystThe M&A pipeline you said not long ago was quite rich so is there other acquisition you may consider particularly in Avionics? Are you now pretty much set in terms of the product that you have in your portfolio following this acquisition or are there other targets that may be of interest for you? In particular I think L3Harris has put its avionic business for sale so is it the kind of deal that you would consider for example? And perhaps as a follow-up question on the revenue synergy. Are there other acquisition be it in digital, security or space or defense that could be complementary and enablers to your revenue synergy targets? And last, what would be the highest level of financial leverage Thales would be ready to take today?
Yannick Assouad
executiveIt's a long question. I'm going to start and then hand it to Pascal for sure, but I'm going to answer for Avionics. First of all, clearly as said by the group by Patrice and Pascal, we are looking at bolt-on acquisition that can bring either product complementary portfolio to our unique portfolio and we have still things we can do in that arena. That's the first objective that we have. And second, as you know, Thales Avionics customers is centered more on the European aircraft OEMs than it is on the American airplane OEM. As the leader of Avionics, I feel I should recalibrate that a bit towards the U.S. aircraft OEM. And again if there is an acquisition in our field that fulfill one or the other of these objectives, obviously the group will look at it. Is there anything that we like that is available in the market today? Yes, but it's not available as easy as that. So clearly we don't have a clear target as we had with Cobham that is predefined as of now, but we'll be looking at any opportunity. Maybe a word about L3Harris since you've talked about it. It so happened that we have a JV with L3Harris that is dear to our product line because they are producing TCAS proximity warning onboard the cockpit that we integrate into our Avionics offering. So clearly we cannot ignore that part of that and the share of L3Harris into that JV for sale. Of course we are monitoring that process very closely. This is what I can comment on this one.
Pascal Bouchiat
executiveOkay. Outside Avionics, I would stick to what we shared with you about our overall M&A policy. And really what we are presenting today is really and in part the M&A strategy that we presented to you so with a few quite important criteria for Thales to decide moving on potentially on acquisition. So once again making sure that any acquisition will strengthen our existing core businesses at Thales. We are not interested at all in buying diversified type of businesses or adjacent businesses, first point. Second point, what we call plug-in type of acquisition so easy to integrate a business within any of our existing GBUs overall within Thales. Third element, making sure that acquisitions will strengthen our existing portfolio of technologies. We are a technology driven company, which means that any time we look at a target, we assess and we spend a lot of time assessing the quality of the technology. And I mean Cobham Aerospace Communications is really a business that we can tick all these boxes. Now then it's about level of contributions of any acquisitions in terms of boosting our profile in terms of growth and profitability and this is what we are also looking for. And last point, probably rebounding on your last questions about financial leverage. It's about the valuation and of course size. You probably have in mind that end of 2022 we reported overall at Thales a net 0 debt situation, by the way post IFRS 16. And with this overall message of Thales willing to keep in the midterm a strong investment grade status overall. This is how we want to manage our balance sheet, which means that these transactions which is quite significant in terms of investments. But really it's very much in line with the overall level of flexibility overall at Thales. Does it mean that we will no longer consider any additional acquisition? Of course not. We'll keep tracking the market on potential acquisitions that would meet the various criterias that I just mentioned. We made it clear that particular digital assets would be of interest for us. So we have not changed our mind on this matters while always having in mind a disciplined capital allocation overall for Thales. And I guess this example of today also illustrates what it means overall for us.
Aymeric Poulain
analystRevenue synergies?
Pascal Bouchiat
executiveYes. There was a question about would potential additional M&A would favor revenue synergies on these transactions. This is how I understood your question, Aymeric.
Aymeric Poulain
analystAre there acquisitions that you need to do perhaps in space or in digital securities that can enable the synergy or even enhance them as indeed there may be some additional service that can be extracted from such products?
Pascal Bouchiat
executiveWe'll see, but it's not part of what we have reported in terms of commitment on revenue synergies. So It's a commitment from Thales that is really based on the merits of the specific acquisitions and we'll not get back to you telling you that we need to make another move to deliver on the synergies that we presented to you today. Now if one day there is additional opportunities that would enhance the possibility to make additional revenue synergies, of course we'll consider the case of course in a positive way. Okay. I guess that we need to wrap up. I think that we are first, we are delighted by these acquisitions, first point. Once again helping Thales to keep developing a more and more qualitative portfolio of assets. I guess next time we discuss will be as we'll release our H1 2023 figures. I guess it's Friday next week, Bertrand, yes. So thank you very much for your attention and thank you very much for having participated in such a short notice. Thank you and bye-bye.
Yannick Assouad
executiveThanks. Bye.
Operator
operatorThank you, ladies and gentlemen. If you didn't have a chance to ask your question on today's call, please do not hesitate to send your question to Thales Group Investor Relations at ir@thalesgroup.com and we will get back to you as soon as possible. Thank you all for your participation. You may now disconnect.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Thales S.A. transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Thales S.A. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.