The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
September 10, 2026
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Unknown Speaker
unknownThank you. Okay. You'll do that for me? Okay. Thank you. Okay. So, I'm going to go ahead and get started. We're going to get started. It is always such a treat to close out our conference with Chairman, Founder, and Brewer, CEO Jim Koch of Boston Beer. It's also a treat to have him pour a beer for me because not many people get to have that opportunity of a truly professionally... beer. So, thank you again so much for joining us at the conference. It's always such a highlight. So, Jim, over the last year or two, you've increasingly described Boston Beer less as a beer company and more as a participant in what you've described as the Fourth Category. And you've been talking about the Fourth Category for a long time, more and more time dedicated to Beyond Beer. So, how do you define the company you're trying to build over the next decade, and what would success look like from here?
Unknown Speaker
unknownWell, let's see, when I think about that, I kind of go back to our mission statement that we actually wrote in the '90s, early '90s, so we had a, I guess, a portent of what the market was going to be like in 20 or 30 years. Our mission is to seek long-term profitable growth by offering the highest quality products to the U.S., and we haven't really changed. That is our mission, it was our mission in 1992, it's our mission tomorrow. And luckily, I think the future that we saw came true, that there were wonderful, delicious, desirable beverages that were out there, but nobody had yet made. And I think that opportunity continues to exist for us. We're really, as a company, built around growth and finding it in many different ways. And I see the beer category or the Beyond Beer category as continuing to be both mature and dynamic. So it's kind of like this box, and it's, you know, you look at it at the outside, it's the same height, width, depth, not really moving around or anything, but then you open it up and all hell is breaking loose in there. So that's what I see going on. And if I were to like be more specific, you know, I've what I would use as our success metrics is that revenue growth and continued margin expansion and continuing to return cash to the shareholders. Great.
Unknown Speaker
unknownYou have previously talked about a belief in the company's unique right to win in emerging beverage categories because of your existing manufacturing capabilities, distributor relationships, and route to market advantages. How much of that advantage remains proprietary today versus 5 years ago? And particularly in the context of RTDs really proliferating and lines blurring at the distributors here. Yes.
Unknown Speaker
unknownI guess I'm not totally sure what proprietary means here. We don't have patent protections on anything, so it's really kind of more know-how. But it, to build an innovation engine is not easy, particularly at any kind of scale. And my experience in doing that is it's a combination of culture, processes, manufacturing capabilities, systems, habits. It starts with a growth culture and a growth mindset, but then you've got to build a lot of different capabilities around that, and there's like speed to market and reading consumers and being close to the retailer. I could go on, and it's not easy to duplicate all those, and it's a common phenomenon that big companies struggle to innovate, and that we the way they end up doing it is finding, you know, companies that are about to be successful and make them more successful, but they're internal. And that's true in beverages, it's true in life sciences, you know, the big pharma companies, they're not that innovative, but they know how to buy technology. And in some ways, it's probably economically rational for them because their hurdle rate may be higher than the return rate from the entire ecosystem of small innovators.
Unknown Speaker
unknownSo if we stick with the bigger picture, something else you've also suggested over time,
Unknown Speaker
unknownis that the future of alcohol will look more fragmented than in past decades. So inside the box. Yep. Chaos. You know, fewer mega brands, more premium niche brands, if that's right, and that's how the market continues to evolve. How does it change the way that Boston Beer allocates resources? Maybe it's, you know, not as much about a handful of billion-dollar brands, but rather, you know, a more fragmented and diverse portfolio. Yes.
Unknown Speaker
unknownI think that's Reed, is exactly right. And in some ways, it's inherent in premiumization. Premiumization generally means fragmentation, and maybe a model is the hard liquor market. And when I look at that and what the biggest brand in, you know, in spirits is Tito's, and at Tito's is less than 4% of the volume. And you add up like the top 20, and I don't think you get to 50%. You may be, when you add up the top 10, like down at the bottom of that list of the top 10, the first digit is 1%, maybe it's 1.5, but that's very fragmented. And also, spirits has been really good at premiumizing over the last 40 years. So I'd think that is a model for the Fourth Category and probably all of alcoholic beverages. And to your question about how do we then allocate resources, this is, to me, a very advantageous market for us because something that is half a percent of the beer market is transformative for us. If we can bring out a product that's a half a percent of the beer market, that's more than 10% growth just there. So we're willing to overinvest in things that we know can't be the next Michelob Ultra. But if they're the next Sun Cruiser, that's a big deal for us. And we, as part of that philosophy, we would, we lean very heavily towards making a margin accretive. You know, for example, you know, Sun Cruiser, it's 30, 20% higher price than Twisted Tea, and commensurately higher margins. So, if it's going to fragment, our philosophy would be it also has to premiumize.
Unknown Speaker
unknownOkay, okay.
Unknown Speaker
unknownHeard that before, this now, premiumization is fragmentation, but it's so true. Okay, so in this vein, you've often described Boston Beer as a company willing to fail quickly, and that fits with your comment that you'll overinvest in something that you think has that potential. How would you say your innovation process has evolved over the last several years? You know, whether it's focusing more on new-to-world concepts or brand renovation, but also, overall, how has the innovation process evolved? Mm-hmm.
Unknown Speaker
unknownIt's a good question. I'm still sort of struggling with the idea of one of our special capabilities is our ability to fail. But I guess that's true. It was filled out.
Unknown Speaker
unknownOkay, good.
Unknown Speaker
unknownSo we have, over the last 5 years, 3 years, spent a lot of time and effort structuring, building a system around the innovation capability. And so, you know, we have a dedicated team. For a company our size, it's quite large. And we are adding capabilities to that team, things like today, really great AI-driven deep social listening, for example, to really highlight trends earlier is something we spent a lot of money on. And just having a very, you know, cadence and structured process, which is basically the innovations team is, their job is to come up with a viable new product every 3 months, and with the expectation that 1 out of 10 will hit and become a Sun Cruiser type of product. And for us, so that's failing whatever 9 out of 10 products, but having a lot of kind of shots on goal. And as a result, if we're successful like that, that is a, you know, I don't know, high single, you know, of high-mid, low-mid-digit volume growth rate for us, which, if the margins are also increasing, is a very successful compounding model of financial returns.
Unknown Speaker
unknownYou've recently become more selective around advertising investment, including pulling back on about $20 million of lower return spend. Are there any new data sets or analytical tools that have helped you better understand where returns were subpar and what lessons, if there's like a through line, you know, on kind of where you've decided to dial back the spend, kind of what's the through line if there if there is one? Um.
Unknown Speaker
unknownThere are several. And the answer to your first question is yes, there is a new tool that we've been working on since 2012. So, this is a new tool. And it ended up being called the Holy Grail because it was quite a search. And it's essentially single source advertising research at scale. Single source means, you get a real individual and you measure what ads they were exposed to, and then you match that up with their purchase, their actual purchase behavior. And that, for decades, I mean, it's been known that's the gold standard, but it's super expensive. And so you couldn't really afford to do it. But in today's world, and finally, this has all come together with big data meeting AI. But you could think of it like this. You have an IP address. And today, you know what ads got served to that IP address. And today, that IP address is linked to loyalty card data, and credit card data. And that covers 80% plus of the purchases in the grocery channels and the other measured channels that we serve. And so you can take that and you can look at an individual IP address, look at their purchase behavior, before exposure to the ad and subsequent to exposure to the ad to determine the delta, the increase or lack of increase in their purchase behavior. And with AI, you can match that set of people up to a theoretically identical clone that did not see the ad. And so the difference between the people who saw the ad, the increase in purchases from the people who saw the ad or were served the ad relative to the ones who didn't gives you a... you know, your gross profit. You can calculate the incremental gross profit generated by the money you spent exposing people to the ads and get a legitimate ROI on that. And we're not the only ones, I'm sure, doing this, but it's something that we've been working on since 2012. And some of the through lines on that are, most advertising doesn't work. Somewhere between 20% and 30% of CPG type advertising. So sophisticated, really quality advertising, 70% to 80% doesn't work, 20% to 30% works. So that's 1, I mean, so the odds are against you when you spend money on a hat. The second one is that changes our philosophy about where we put our money. Traditionally, you have an advertising budget for your product line and each brand gets this much advertising support. And there's a lot of thought, I'm sure, that goes into that and some politics and some judgment. And so forth, but you're advertising against brands. Well, if only 20% or 30% of the advertising out there works, you shouldn't be doing that. You should be advertising against ads that are and ad campaigns that work and have an ROI. And as a result, you know, we've like taken out all the advertising support for brands until we can demonstrate that the creative actually generates incremental sales.
Unknown Speaker
unknownOkay.
Unknown Speaker
unknownOkay. So how do you then balance, though, maximizing near-term returns and, like, maintaining a level of support, needing to keep them culturally relevant? So, like, because you remove all the ads, and maybe it's not incremental growth, but you still have to remain visible? So, or maybe you don't. Not unless, if it's not generating, if it's not changing consumers' purchase behavior. It's a waste of money. I don't know what that means. Well, you need to be, awareness is good.
Unknown Speaker
unknownUm, but it has to be the right kind. So, in what we've done is then, if we had to take that money and invest in other things. It might be dealer loaders, it might be distributor incentives, it might be sponsoring a highly visible team. Um, it's those kind of, it might be a sales force incentive, it might be, uh, team. Really good point of sale material that will get displays built. You have to get into the really grassroots tactical stuff which works. It works very well for us. A key way of creating visibility is through our sales force, getting our products on premise, where they are seen and where people can sample them. Just being in the cooler today with this kaleidoscope of fragmentation isn't really going to get you visible, because the cooler at a liquor store here in Boston or Massachusetts or a grocery store up in New Hampshire, there's just too many brands. And I the average consumer probably spends, I don't know, 30 seconds, maybe 60 seconds in the beer aisle in total. So, you know, can't get seen that easily there. But in a bar, they've only got, you know, 10 packaged beer and Fourth Category brands, maybe 12 or something. So, I'd rather be on that menu than be on the History Channel.
Unknown Speaker
unknownOkay, as an example.
Unknown Speaker
unknownOkay, let's now drill down to talk about some specific brands. So, let's start with where you're seeing some great success, Sun Cruiser, which you mentioned earlier. Clearly, the brand's exceeded expectations. But 1 thing that stands out is this discipline you've shown around keeping it really focused. As you think about the next phase of growth for Sun Cruiser, how do you balance optimizing near-term opportunities, but then still maintaining that long-term health of the brand. Wow.
Unknown Speaker
unknownWell, we generally are more focused on the long-term health of the brand, but because you can't get there without short-term health, so we've always, you know, as I said with the mission statement, long-term profitable growth. Um, and I think for Sun Cruiser in particular, this this year was the first year where we were fully represented in the chains. I mean, it's only effectively, uh, a 3-year-old brand. So, we have expanded opportunities for more SKUs in the chains, more packages, because we've proliferated packages to address certain needs rather than as much line extensions and flavors as we've done in the past. So, you know, we're now we'll do 18-packs so that we can hit a price point at Costco. That creates a lot of visibility. So that's the kind, we believe there is further upside next year, Sun Cruiser will roughly double this year. I mean, it's a retail, it's a kind of half a billion-dollar brand from nothing 3 years ago. So I'm very happy about that because it demonstrates our continuing ability to successfully innovate new to world brands and create significant volume and gross margin dollars and so forth from thin air essentially. But there's still... and there's geographic, the geography means the share that, uh, vodka teas in general, and certainly Sun Cruiser in the Northeast is maybe multiples the size that it is on the West Coast, in California in particular. So there's a lot of growth still to be had geographically.
Unknown Speaker
unknownOkay.
Unknown Speaker
unknownSo when, I'm just curious to talk a little bit about the interaction with Twisted Tea, whether there's been a little bit of, you know, some interaction between the two. How do you think about optimizing the IT portfolio as a whole rather than, you know, looking at the brands individually?
Unknown Speaker
unknownWell, we kind of look at them individually. I'm a big believer in, I guess it was Steve's job, Jobs' aphorism about, well, if we don't cannibalize ourselves, somebody else will. So, uh, go full blast on Twisted Tea. Don't worry about hurting Sun Cruiser and vice versa. Just maximize meeting consumer needs through the portfolio and recognize there's going to be interaction and don't hold back to try to protect 1 brand over another.
Unknown Speaker
unknownGreat. So, but in that vein, Twisted Tea has faced some headwinds the last couple of years. Your recent commentary has talked a bit about, you know, executional fixes, whether it's like pricing in certain markets, price pack architecture, supporting faster-growing line extensions. Do you do you think that the path back to healthier trends for Twisted Tea is really a matter of execution? Or do you think that like consumer preferences have changed and you want to, you know, you need to rethink some of the positioning of the brand?
Unknown Speaker
unknownBoth are true. Um, and I think what has happened is that it's not that Sun Cruiser stole a lot of Twisted Tea drinkers. We had reasonably good data on that, and it was like 20%. However, something subtler happened. T's sort of de-positioned Twisted Tea. Uh, and by that I mean, um, a lot of people thought Twisted Tea was from vodka, for example. Even more people didn't care. It tasted good. And the vodka teas are 100 calories. So they raise questions about, well, what's in the tea? Twisted Tea. And the exact same thing happened to Mike's Hard Lemonade. Their exact numbers track Twisted Tea. People said, huh, oh, it's malt and malt beverage. And that historically has meant like malt liquor and low end stuff. So that was a deep positioning, and then the 100 calories, people said, well, what's in Twisted Tea? And the Twisted Tea Light's 110, but Twisted Tea and original is 190, and it hit Mike similarly. I think they're like 230, so it was that deep positioning more than a direct migration of 1 drinker who was Twisted Tea replacing it with Sun Cruiser.
Unknown Speaker
unknownOkay.
Unknown Speaker
unknownAnd so from here then, I know a couple things. 1 is you started a Hispanic retail program oriented the United States' first ever branded retail program this summer. So I'm just curious about how that's gone. Maybe it's a little too early to say, but any read on that and just execution things specifically that you may be doing on Twisted. You mentioned Light, but things that you're doing to kind of try to get your brand back. Yep. Well, the first question, from 1.
Unknown Speaker
unknownAnd what I can see, the Hispanic consumers come back a little bit. They're no longer sending their kid out to buy their groceries, because they're worried that ICE is going to scoop them up. So there's a little bit less of that concern. But they're also hit probably more badly than the rest of the population with the increase in fuel and basic staples. Then the second question was about execution of things. And, you know, I think everybody in this conference is always worried about executional things. You can always get better and they should be because, you know, and particularly for us, we're in a route to market business. So how we show up at retail, how we get the distributors to, you know, merchandise our product, all those kinds of things really matter. I And 1 of our issues is as this past summer, through this whole year as vodka teas took off, they became and other RTDs they became the hot category, so we lost display space. So we're always fighting for display space, the pricing kind of, the shelf price in some markets got away from us. I mean, basically we were growing 20%, so we took price. And then our distributors took even more price and the retailers. So we got to the point where, and Twisted Tea historically has been a more, you know, middle America, type of brand, and it's got to the point where it was priced above Stella and Modelo and some of the bigger imports, and that's not really where it should be positioned. So, you know, a $19.99 12-pack is the right price point. And we were at even $22.99 in some places. The margins were quite attractive and we tried to jawbone people down. We were successful in some markets and we actually saw the volume respond. And then we did some, we're just starting to dip our toe into revenue growth management. And that led us to say, well, we need a $9.99 price point, but the 6-packs aren't going to make that. So we had a 4-pack of 16 ounce, and that got us into several thousand dollar price point type of stores because it hit a $9.99 price point. So things like that.
Unknown Speaker
unknownOkay, great. Just while we're on the topic of kind of closer in trends and what's been going on with these brands. Any thoughts on how the balance of the summer trended versus your expectations? Obviously, we had an amazing few weeks for beer and vodka. Yes. But do you think the World Cup might have, I'm an optimist at heart, might have helped remind people that it's, like, fun to socialize and meet people? Meet up with friends outside the home and enjoy Fourth Category or the beer category. I mean, it obviously reminded us in Boston. Yes. Um.
Unknown Speaker
unknownThat was a true story. The Tartan Army literally drank us out of Boston Lager at our tap room twice in 1 night. We had to send a bartender down to the brewery to load up his station wagon with more kegs. Twice. We were pouring a Boston Lager every 12 seconds for a couple of hours there. But to your point, I don't know if it carried over. I have to believe it did in some ways. But you're and hopefully that expanded beyond the original 11 host cities. So at the headline, fun story level, it was very cool. I'm not, it takes a lot to change fundamental habits that, but I believe we're slowly rolling back the COVID slumber, and people are realizing, you know, it's part of a happy lifestyle to have friends and to socialize with them. And alcohol has been a part of that for at least 10,000 years. But it's going to take, unfortunately, more than just the World Cup. The summer didn't matter, not improve, at least from our point of view. And I think that's, there's, nobody really knows what the real numbers are, but I think the trend has not been good.
Unknown Speaker
unknownSo investors naturally spend most of their time talking about Sun Cruiser, Twisted Tea, and Truly. I was just curious what brand or business within the portfolio do you think is the most underappreciated today?
Unknown Speaker
unknownOh, um, well, Angry Orchard is sort of a sleeper. But uh, it's started growing again over a year ago. So, and it's well over 40% of the hard cider category. I mean, it's kind of Angry Orchard. There is no number 2, but. So that's driving category growth for Angry Orchard. It's exciting to me because, again, it shows that we can take a a 30-year-old category. We've been making hard ciders since I think '96 or something like that, and bring growth back to it. And to me, a priority is to bring growth back to Sam Adams. I mean, craft categories struggled for a bunch of reasons, it's mature. Um, there's 10,000 craft brewers. Everything got centered around IPA, and so there's not really other growth vehicles for it. But I'm encouraged by some early green shoots with Sam Adams, we will see. We have very effective advertising. Our Holy Grail methodology is indicating that we're getting a 2-to-1 ROI on advertising expenditures, so we're going to be expanding that. We actually, and then we validated that in some matched market testing, so I'm feeling much, much better about Sam Adams, so it hasn't shown up in the trends.
Unknown Speaker
unknownLet's shift gears and talk about the margin transformation, which has been a significant part of the story. Spoken about procurement savings, brewery efficiencies, network optimization, and now revenue management is another element. Those earlier productivity areas mature, what do you see as the next wave of kind of self-help coming? Where does that come from over the next 3 to 5 years?
Unknown Speaker
unknownWell, I think all of them have some ways to go. There is still a lot of, you know, what the Japanese would call Muda, um, waste in our systems. And I began my career as a manufacturing consultant. That was what I did for 7 years. I knew nothing about marketing, CPG and so forth. Uh, but I knew a lot about foundries and things like that. Uh, and it is not unrealistic in today's world where Kaizen and continuous improvements and Six Sigma, all those, Lean Manufacturing, all those, they're basically variations of the Toyota Production System, you sort of expect 3% real dollars to come out of your supply chain. So that in and of itself, I think, can continue to drive our margins up. I mean, I know there are some already significant savings for next year that are, you know, in our contracts, in pricing, like aluminum cans. We have had these extra warehouses outside of the breweries. At 1 point we're spending $50 million on them. That is complete Muda and nothing good happens to beer when it's sitting in an unnecessary warehouse. We will be fully out of those. We're out of them almost fully in Cincinnati and working on it in Pennsylvania. So, and there's other things like, you know, can we use a different, I mean, there's a lot of million or $2 million items for the... will continue with the momentum next year. Beyond that, it may settle. We've been taking more than 3% out of our our cost structure every year for a few years. So, and that's where I want to end up is at least 3% a year out of the cost structure.
Unknown Speaker
unknownSo 1 visible outcome of these productivity efforts has been a significant increase in the percentage of volume you're producing internally. As you continue optimizing the network, how do you think about balancing manufacturing efficiency against the flexibility that third-party production can give you in a business particularly where consumer trends can change so quickly?
Unknown Speaker
unknownWe've always had backup capacity. I think of the third-party production, you know, you have to pay for it. You have shortfall fees or you buy equipment. There's lots of ways. We and we end up paying for it, but it's not free. Some of it justifies itself because it's in, I mean, we use a city brewery outside of, well, it's in Los Angeles. We don't have any breweries close to Los Angeles. The closest one's Cincinnati. Otherwise it's Pennsylvania. Uh, so that justifies itself. Then there are capabilities that we don't have. I mean, we just set up 2 manufacturing sites to make a new, uh, our newest innovation product, which is called Lytt, L-Y-T-T. It's a little out there. It's a light bulb, like a 60 watt. Think of a little light bulb, and that little light bulb has 200 milliliters of 15% alcohol liquid. The concept is pre-gaming, which, you know, our kids have done, but now you have adults doing it. Because before you go out and you're in a bar where you're buying $18 cocktails, you get a head start. Or if you're going into a venue where, I forget what a Sam Adams in Fenway is, maybe it's over $20. You might sneak in a Lytt. It's the equivalent of 2 light beers. And it's also, it tastes delicious. It's a really good mixer. And consumers are taking, we put out capabilities and then they figured how to use them. So consumers are just mixing it with, uh, technology La Croix or Polar to make what tastes like a mixed drink. It's a lot of fruit base in most of them, though there's even, we're working on a a milk base like an espresso martini. It's very pliable in terms of the flavor profile that we can create in those. I don't know how big it'll be, but we have now, we're set up to accomplish to accommodate a reasonably significant demand with 2 facilities, and it's like $15 million worth of equipment, but we didn't want to put them in our brewery because it's just so different. Nobody's got conveyors to convey light bulbs. And it's different. We're set up to bring in cans and fill them. This stuff you bring in little plugs and injection mold them into the container itself. So when there's weird things like that that we don't want to mess up otherwise quite efficient breweries with, we will do that with a.
Unknown Speaker
unknownCo-packer. Okay, great. Um, we only have a few minutes left, so just before we conclude today, and hopefully everyone here will join us outside for some delicious Boston Beer beverages, we'd just love to get your perspective on what you think investors are most likely underestimating today about the business.
Unknown Speaker
unknownI would say our ongoing capabilities that set us apart and make us kind of different. I mean, it's a lot of different things. I mean, we still have an entrepreneurial culture after 40 years. I'm still there, you know, driving things and working with an incredibly talented team. We have a clearly very strong, if not best in class, innovation capabilities. We are becoming the low cost producer of our very complex product mix. We have a product mix that would cripple, you know, 1 of the big breweries because they're set up for long runs and economies of scale and everything. We're set up to be flexible, adaptable, but not lose efficiency. We've got what is almost universally acknowledged as the best sales force in the business. That gives us a route to market, especially through on-premise and through independents that nobody else has. We have a great distributor network. There's been hand-picked and really great relations with them. You know, everybody, it's I don't know if anybody in this rumors heard of the Tamarand survey, but beer distributors rate their suppliers every year. I think the They've done it for 18 years and we've been rated as the number 1 supplier. I believe 14 of those 18 years. Um, and this is a route to market. Business distributors are super important. We have a very healthy balance sheet. You know, we've never borrowed money. We generate cash, so we're not distracted by by the financial things that characterize most companies. We're not good at it, and maybe we should have been more leveraged, but we don't have distractions like that. We're just focused on growth.
Unknown Speaker
unknownWell, thank you so much for being here again this year. Um, everyone, please join me in thanking Jim and the rest of the Boston Beer team for being with us. This live transcript is auto-generated without human intervention or review. This live transcript is auto-generated without human intervention or review.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete The Boston Beer Company, Inc. transcript — plus 254,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to The Boston Beer Company, Inc. earnings transcripts and 254,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.