Tradeweb Markets Inc. (TW) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

February 28, 2020

NASDAQ US Financials Capital Markets conference_presentation 35 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Arinash Ghosh

analyst
#1

Let's get started, everyone. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the 21st Annual Crédit Suisse Financial Services Forum. My name is Ari Ghosh, and I cover the U.S. exchanges here at Crédit Suisse. It's my pleasure today to introduce Tradeweb's management team this morning. With us on stage, we have President, Billy Hult; and CFO, Bob Warshaw. We also have Ashley Serrao, Head of U.S. Corporate Development and Head of Investor Relations, in the audience with us today. The structure of our discussion today is a fireside format. We'll hit on a few key themes and then open it up for Q&A. So 2019 was a pivotal year at Tradeweb following the company's very successful IPO in April, Tradeweb ended the year seeing record volumes, double-digit revenue and EPS growth and then also best-in-class margin expansion. The momentum is carried on into this year with strong Jan volumes, which were up almost 30% year-over-year. Gentlemen, great to have you here, and let's try and dive in.

William Hult

executive
#2

Thank you.

Arinash Ghosh

analyst
#3

So over the last few days, we've heard from some of your competitors. Certainly, given the market conditions, there's some near-record volumes as well. So curious if we could get a sense of what you're hearing for your platform. Give us an update on volume trends, more from a general sense, as it pertains to volatility. Do you still see that level of electronic trading on your platform and also things like AiEX? It's a utilization at the -- at same rates that you announced.

William Hult

executive
#4

Sure, sure. First, Ari, thanks very much for having us. You're right, this is our first time at this conference. CS has always been a huge partner of Tradeweb. So like, super happy to be here, and we really appreciate you inviting us. Even once Tradeweb had become a successful platform and we have become sort of mainstream in government bonds and TBA mortgages and European governments and we've started to become, certainly, mainstream in global swaps, we would sort of, once in a while, find kind of some frustrating outcomes, and those frustrating outcomes would be we would do all this work with clients around behavior change. We felt like we were in this really good place in terms of all the efficiencies that we were providing. But when like the markets got really tricky, when the markets got really volatile, when the markets got really busy, when price location -- or price dislocation would happen, we would find this like, frustrating thing happen, which would be clients would revert and they would go from like, all of this work that we would do to getting them to click the mouse, and sometimes, they would go back on the phone and do trades. And that was like, this really frustrating thing. What I would say kind of very clearly is that over the past, really now, maybe 3, 4 years, that trend has gone away. And so in the most volatile markets, when the markets are the most dislocated, when there's a lot of things happening, actually, the pace of electronification tends to 100% increase. So these are kind of like very interesting times for us as a company for a bunch of reasons. The other thing I would say, back to your question a little bit, is like it's -- and I say this in a very straightforward way, it's a good time to be kind of in the rates markets, right? And if you think about what's happening obviously with the yield curve, when you think about what's happening with treasury prices, the fact that Tradeweb sits in this kind of leadership position -- specifically speaking, I'll give sort of like 3 obvious examples. Dollar swaps, European -- euro swaps, and then obviously, we have a very, very strong position in the TBA mortgage market, this is like a very, very interesting and I think a very kind of good environment for a company like Tradeweb without getting into actual numbers and all those things. Ahead of time, it's a sort of very interesting moment to be sort of both getting all the benefits of this kind of onslaught of further electronification and then all of this activity that's happening at the same time. It's pretty interesting. AiEX, and I kind of talked about this a lot. For anyone here that hasn't heard me speak about this, AiEX has been kind of a game-changer in some levels because I used to ask the question, which was like, "In this day and age, in 2020 and 2019, like, why are customers still picking up the phone and doing trades the kind of old-fashioned way?" And I would sort of obviously come to the answer that it would usually be kind of like 1 or -- for 1 or 2 reasons, right? The one reason would be I'm doing a trade -- I'm a customer and I'm doing like a big market moving trade, and I want to make sure I'm talking on the phone and doing it with one person. The other reason would be sometimes like, "Hey, it's a complicated trade or it's a negotiated trade or it's a trade that I'm having a hard time finding the other side to." Interestingly, as we've gotten very strong around our AiEX product, which is essentially a smart algorithm that allows clients to find and search for the other side of the trade, it's really less about the mouse and it's more about these algorithms now. This kind of answer to this mystery around why are people still doing phone trades. Large-sized trades tend to get broken up into more digestible trades, which find the other side through AiEX. So that's like a big trend that's kind of pushing things into the electronic stage. And as markets get busy, it's kind of accelerating even further.

Arinash Ghosh

analyst
#5

Got it. And you touched on electronification of markets. You have clearly a long-term secular driver in your business. Hopefully, you've been with Tradeweb since its formation. You've seen the business evolve. So maybe talk about, over the past decade, some of the factors that are driving client demand for greater automation. Why today? Why is that demand increasing so much more?

William Hult

executive
#6

There's something like about -- like, there was a moment where clients really appreciated and understood the value of being able to look on a screen and seeing 2-sided pricing. We're like, "Oh, wow, like I used to wonder where Fannie 5s were. And now we can look up on a screen and see like a plus market -- 2-sided plus market." It took a little bit of time for actually Tradeweb with the company to be able, like, "hey, look, these prices are going to go away. We're a trade execution business. These prices are going to go away unless you use the system and support it." So the sort of the value of the market data of it all was in the pre-trade price transparency was open, really obvious to clients. It took a little while for them actually to understand like, "Hey, look, support the platform, get the benefits of the trade execution." And then the pricing even gets better. So that was actually kind of like the first thing that really wound up sort of striking with the clients. And the other thing I would just mention is like, obviously, the digitization of it all, the straight-through processing, the ability to not have to write a trade ticket. These are things that have always been just like creating massive efficiencies for clients all the way through. Behavior change is kind of the whole thing, right? It's like, how do you change the behavior of these clients. And I've always described it a little bit like the first sort of battle around it all was like, how do we get these guys like off of the phone and on to the mouse? Clearly, what's happening now and particularly over the last couple of years is like the mouse, on some level, is actually like, going away. And AiEX and smart trading and all these things that are happening are really kind of taking over and becoming the new way for the buy side to engage in the marketplace. That's like, a clear, powerful and real trend that's happening in the market.

Arinash Ghosh

analyst
#7

Helpful. Maybe just jumping into some of the key areas of focus. Let's start with credit. So market share in high grade over the last couple of years has almost doubled. When you then think about some of the items that are driving that, you've got the unique net spotting technology clearly adding to already what you got, a very healthy market. So looking ahead, what's your expectations around market share? Maybe talk about some of the new initiatives that can contribute to volume and share gain over the next 12 months.

William Hult

executive
#8

Yes. Very good question. So I kind of like maybe describe it for a quick second this way, which is like -- and I think most people here know this, that Tradeweb grew up in the rates business, but we grew up 100% in the business competing, right? We had Bloomberg essentially from day 1 as a big, competitive force with us in the marketplace, whether or not that was government bonds, TBA mortgages, European governments, interest rate swaps. So we honed ourselves as a company through competition. How do we price our service? How do we build technology? How do we engage with our clients? How do we get great as an organization? Because we knew we had to be great. There was a period of time, and I give -- to your question about credit, MarketAxess is a really good company. Actually, they're a great company. We kind of felt like they had a pretty good free run without a lot of competition in the space. So we went out and we talked to the biggest clients, and we asked them like the sort of -- the question I think that everyone here would expect us to ask, which is, "Is there room for competition in the space? Does the market want competition?" And the answer we got was a sort of resounding kind of yes. Competition is good. And so we kind of got back and went a little bit into the drawing board and we said, "Like, okay, how are we actually going to do this? How are we going to compete, right?" And so we had to 100% acknowledge, I think, something that they do really, really well, which is like how they built their all-to-all system. We had to figure out a way to compete with that and to build up our network and allow our network to be healthy enough and big enough so that this big network, this big, vast network of responders would be available to us. And I think we've done a lot of work -- a lot of good work on that. And then we had to do something probably more important, which is like, what can we do better? And what can we do differently? And how are we going to add efficiencies and value to our customers? So we've identified, I would say, at least 2 things. One is like, obviously, Tradeweb known for rates. The credit market and the rates markets already linked. We had to figure out the right way to create that linkage. We had to figure out the right way to allow customers to auto-spot and auto-hedge. And I've described that in the past as a little bit of a light bulb moment with customers, that we've created a lot of savings, a lot of value and a lot of efficiencies, right? So that's one. And then two is, obviously, and I think everybody here in this room knows that portfolio trading is a big and real trend in the fixed income market. I think we've been a leader and a pioneer around creating the workflow around that. I think that has resonated with clients. And I think that's something that distinguishes us. So I kind of highlight those 2 things as like real drivers behind why we've been able to pick up some market share. And I think all of that is described in the context of something that's obviously important, which is like, the marketplace likes and wants to and will support competition in the space. And I think we've distinguished ourselves very much recently as that competitive force in the market.

Arinash Ghosh

analyst
#9

You talked about portfolio trading. Currently, a small piece of the overall market, I think 3%, 4%, something like that. Why is that a game-changer?

William Hult

executive
#10

It's something that resonates with the biggest and most influential customers, to start with. So we always like it when like -- when you have a conversation with a -- I'll use BlackRock as an example because they've been a big proponent of portfolio trading and that -- and they sort of like say, "Hey, you've nailed this workflow, you know you're onto something." We think that there has been a historical inefficiency, obviously, around how bid lists and offer lists tend to get put out into the marketplace and priced. And we think all-to-all and MarketAxess' great work around that has helped solve for a portion of that. And I think in an elegant -- and somewhat obviously, portfolio trading is possibly, and I think I can describe this as almost like a 2.0 innovation around how am I going to get these kind of cumbersome bid lists, offer lists, these long line item types of positions ultimately priced? And there's something very elegant and efficient around how portfolio trading handles that.

Arinash Ghosh

analyst
#11

Got it. Maybe just one final one on high-grade credit. Clearly, volumes are strong, market share is growing there. Can you give us a sense of where you've been winning this market share? Is it from dealers in the institutional segment, retail? Where is it coming from while the overall market, we understand, is growing?

William Hult

executive
#12

Yes. I think it's a good question. And I think on some level, the credit market structure is kind of interesting because you have a lot of different things happening on here. You have customer sending inquiries to dealers, obviously. You have customers sending out inquiries into this all-to-all. And then sometimes you have customers responding to customers on inquiries. Then you have, like, I think something that's a very big piece of the market now that we call sweep, which is the ability for banks to trade with each other. And then you have something that sort of like maybe strikes everyone as slightly obvious, which is banks actually sending out inquiries to other banks. We feel like we are really well positioned across all of these pieces of the sort of credit ecosystem. And we're kind of like picking up share kind of across the board in some significant way. What I would say, though, and I think this is the important thing for everyone maybe to hear me on this, when I talk about like, these big innovations around net spotting and hedging and portfolio trading, I'm talking about things that directly impact our institutional client base. The Tradeweb network of customers is really -- in some ways, it's like one of the most important things that we've done as a company. And our commitment to solve efficiencies for those customers is at the highest level possible.

Arinash Ghosh

analyst
#13

Got it. On high-yield credit, maybe is there something peculiar about the market segment or the space where maybe it's a little more tough to get market share? Is there something going on there?

William Hult

executive
#14

Yes. There's a little bit -- it's a fair question. It's like the most negotiated of these markets. And so there are protocols that like have things like, countering that can sort of both be tricky to match. And at the same time, it maybe leads to more kind of voice transactions, the market that we're focused on. But I think if I was going to be sort of self-reflective on some level, I would say that's an area where we could improve our offering on and get better at.

Arinash Ghosh

analyst
#15

Got it. Maybe moving to global interest rate spots, the largest 3 products. You get revenue, volumes. Can you remind us what your market share looks like here? And maybe unpack some of the drivers of growth. I think Electronification isn't part of that as well given that it's not a really an electronified market. You've got some of your MAP package tools in place as well. And I think also with the emergence of [ ultimate rates ], that might be helping the process. Like what are some of the [indiscernible]?

William Hult

executive
#16

Bob -- you can help me with this, Bob, maybe. I think my brain's kind of a little dead from being inside too much, so I'm not sure I can quote the exact market share. I could say -- I could kind of describe it to everyone in this way, like the global -- the interest rate swap market is a super-interesting market, right, because it was the last of the real -- in the rates complex, it was the last of the real kind of voice to marketplaces. It was negotiated. It tended to be -- if a client put a trade on with the dealer, that client would take the trade off with that dealer. It was very phone-based. It was very protected for a long time. We 100% need a very strong decision that we were going to place a big bet in global swaps. We were there early, and we fought that market and it fought back. And it was not an easy move from voice space into kind of electronification. The good news for us, and I think the benefit of us being early, was that it really gave us a strong voice around helping shape regulation. Regulation is really the kind of big driver in that marketplace through both Dodd-Frank in the U.S. and then MiFID in Europe in terms of pushing that marketplace into the electronic state. And we -- Obviously, I think on some level, given our network in the rates business, we were extremely well positioned as that market moves from darkness into light, from phone-based into electronification. The really interesting piece, and I can kind of sit here today, and the global swaps business is our biggest business as a company globally. So it's kind of rewarding. I think it's a -- for sure, it's a validation and I think it's an important piece around getting in early, placing that debt early and then having that big knock-on network. The biggest consumers at a various interest -- to your first question, the biggest consumers at different points in the interest rate cycle of interest rate swaps can be mortgage end users, right? And so the fact that we had this very big mortgage network ultimately helped us and swaps quite a bit. So it's been a great kind of interesting story, but I can tell you that, that market was -- that was a real phone-based market of all phone-based markets not that long ago.

Arinash Ghosh

analyst
#17

Yes. And there's still more to go, right?

William Hult

executive
#18

There's still more to go because one of the things -- yes, one of the things for sure is that regulation is kind of happening in Europe in stages. So we kind of talk kind of baseball innings, and sometimes it's hard to get the actual kind of innings completely correct. But I think there's a feeling that like somewhere -- I don't know if we're going to say bottom in the sixth, top of the seventh sort of thing, but there's still, for sure, more onboarding of clients happening in Europe, and that is a fundamental reality. And then you have these moments in time in the rates market, back to your first question, again, where like, the swaps market -- the activity in the swaps market is really going to go up.

Robert Warshaw

executive
#19

I think I'd add to the third one. It's a hard thing to measure because each of the segments of customer sectors are a little bit different in how they -- how far they've come. But I think when we look at the overall market in terms of electronification, it's really in the 25% to 30% range. And that says there's plenty more to go. We've done very well. We tend to -- in the places -- electronifying, we tend to be on the majority side of that. But it's -- but I think that tells you that there's plenty left for us to go after.

Arinash Ghosh

analyst
#20

Got it. Maybe shifting gears into U.S. treasuries, arguably one of the more electronic, mature and competitive markets that you operate in. Volume growth -- but when you think about overall volume growth here, is it a little more predicated on kind of market conditions? Is there a meaningful opportunity to grow your share and volume share through either client penetration? Maybe some new protocols in streaming? How do you see that play out?

William Hult

executive
#21

Yes. Sure. I think maybe we would describe it like a little bit 2 ways. I think there's still a lot of room to grow around penetrating the kind of voice market, particularly in the off-the-run market. And I think some of that penetration, 100%, is going to be around how AiEX and a more sophisticated way of connecting with the market winds up getting to take hold with the big buy-side clients. So that -- again, I'd describe that as a trend -- 100% trend that's in the favor of moving voice trading into electronics. So I think that would be one carve-out. The second piece, I would say, in sort of like the wholesale market, which sometimes we describe more as like -- it's not quite so much wholesale as it is, almost like machine-to-machine, that is obviously like the kind of like heavy electronic business. I think the story there, which I think is very interesting, is like, once the market goes electronic, it does not mean that the innovations in that market kind of end. And I think we are 100% seeing more innovation in that market today. I think it's about a movement out of like, order books as we think about order books in this room and fit things a little bit more like you were describing already around disclosed streams. So I think that's a trend, again, that's going to happen. I think we're well positioned around that trend. And I think it comes back to my original point around credit, which is the market likes competition. So I think one of the ways the market is supporting competition in the wholesale business is by moving some of the business into more of these direct stream environments.

Arinash Ghosh

analyst
#22

Got it. Sticking with competition, maybe you have touched on the products. Taking a step back, as you look at your business, where you have opportunities. Typically, you've seen both scale players try to get in. You see new companies start up as well. So really talk to us about the competitive landscape right now, pricing pressures, maybe threat from scale players as well you beating start-ups in this kind of market might be a risk to the business.

William Hult

executive
#23

Good question, kind of like big, broad question and there's a lot there. The way I would sort of maybe think about or describe it a little bit is like there's always going to be -- there's always kind of Bloomberg around and lingering. And again, like great -- obviously, great company. And we've like, been up against them, as I was describing, essentially from day 1. Here's what I would say, and I think this is important. Some of this migration that I'm describing, which is basically like as the mouse tends to go away more regularly now and things like AiEX and algorithms and aggregated liquidity tends to kind of take over more in terms of the performance, in terms of how clients engage with the marketplace, I think Bloomberg is a little bit -- maybe a little bit flat-footed in terms of this development. If you just think about their ultimate, obviously, like commitment to the terminal, it's the terminal there. Understandably so. That's the big business that they win in and ultimately need to protect. So I think that would be sort of one comment from -- on that. And then I think the other comment, just a little bit on the competitive landscape a little bit is like, obviously, like firms like CME, firms like NASDAQ that play very much in the machine-to-machine space and have had long histories of succeeding and doing extremely well in that space, I think they're going to be moving kind of more into the kind of like Tradeweb, MarketAxess, Bloomberg world of like the client network, understandably. And I think we're going to feel them coming kind of our way more. I can understand why they would want to do that. I don't think it's an easy thing to do, but I feel like we will be feeling some of that competitive pressure from them more over time.

Arinash Ghosh

analyst
#24

Got it. And on the pricing side, have you seen anything change over the last, call it, 12 to 24 months? Because you haven't -- you never started out competing on price. Do you see the need to maybe get a little more aggressive in any area of your business?

William Hult

executive
#25

I kind of sit -- again, it's a very good question. I kind of like -- I've always described like, when we entered into credit, we knew we needed to enter in as kind of like, from our standpoint, a low-cost provider, but we didn't lead with the fact that we were a low-cost provider because what we needed to do is we need to provide that real value to the customers. We needed to solve for and provide just like this real value to customers, which we are doing. And I think we're really comfortable with the fact that we can be the low-cost provider and have a really lucrative business. Over time, it will be interesting whether or not like their pricing comes our way or we move our pricing. But we haven't historically ever increased pricing, right? So we feel that we understand the wallets of these businesses pretty well. And I think we've been pretty confident with how we price our services kind of all the way through.

Arinash Ghosh

analyst
#26

Got it. Maybe switching gears to Bob now. When you introduced your 2020 expense guidance, you noted you can get margin expansion on either end of that range. And just maybe taking a step back, help -- walk us through your bottoms-up approach that you'd have with your product heads, different teams. And how do you derive some comfort around baseline revenue expectations and what the company might look like over 12 months, especially given that you're a volume-driven business? And then that could move around a little bit.

Robert Warshaw

executive
#27

Sure. There's 2 parts to our revenue model that we talk about, which is fixed and variable. And the fixed part, it's pretty easy to do because it's a set of customers that we're used to -- dealers we're used to having in our network and we kind of know the trajectory of what that might look like over time. And that's about 45% of the story before we even get to the variable number. On the variable side of it, we tend to -- we look actually product by product, market by market, what we -- customer sector by customer sector, what we think we know about what's kind of static, what we think we know we're doing that we can control in terms of new capabilities that we think will drive volumes. And that's how most of what we do is built up, is the sort of the things we control rather than worrying too much about can we -- did we plan for this moment of volatility that we're going through right now? The answer is if we depend on that to grow our business, then we're likely to find ourselves more often than not probably not growing our business. So we focus very much on who we are and what we can do. Then we look at cost structure that goes behind that. And we purposely put a cost structure in place that's very, very reactive because it's basically how we pay people against what we have in revenue and earnings, very reactive to the high end. And unfortunately, it's the low end of that curve in terms of how we pay it since compensation is a major part of our cost structure. That has a pretty easy impact on why we believe that even at the low end of our cost structure, that's still at -- it presents how you draw the curve, right? That still says, we believe we're going to have revenue growth, just not the revenue growth that we would potentially say we'd have at the high end. And this has 2 factors to it. At the high end, we get more scale because we get more volume. At the low end, we have a little bit less scale and, to some extent, it isn't necessarily -- they're not sort of even things in it, as we've demonstrated, as our revenue is up, our expenses don't go up this fast. It's a little bit the other way. As our revenue goes down, to some extent, our expenses, it has -- half our expenses are down a little bit, maybe a little quicker in some areas or sort of more deterministic by that model. All of that sort of turns around and says, if you look at how we think about the revenue model specifically against those things is it's not that big of -- we don't see a lot of downside into that revenue model as much as we sort of say what happens on the upside. So that's why we have confidence on the downside. That says we think we are going to do fine at the downside of that and that model will work. And we can never measure what the upside might be, but we can at least say at this range, will that be too better. We have super upside revenue. Likely, it will fall a little bit ahead -- out of that expense range, but we'll have revenue, better margins, other things that make that fine for us.

Arinash Ghosh

analyst
#28

No, that's helpful. Let me just pause right now to see if there are any questions from the audience. Just raise your hands if you have any questions. All right. Let me continue then. So let me just look at M&A, capital and some of the elements over there now. So despite -- clearly, once you're a public company, you have the capacity. Your cash flow, that you demonstrated, is very strong as well. So if I think about some of your priorities, you talked about maybe organic reinvestments and then dividend growth and perhaps off that, M&A and acquisitions. So can you just talk to us about maybe what are you seeing out there? What is the appetite for the company in terms of maybe larger deals, something like that, given that it's your kind of topic right now across both exchange and asset manager [ landscape ]?

William Hult

executive
#29

Yes. When we -- when kind of like Bob and I think a little bit about trade, what we probably think most is like, how we got here kind of on our own. That being said, we have done a few deals over the past years. We did a very nice retail deal, and then we did 2 smaller wholesale deals. So we've had an appetite -- and all those have been successful. We've had an appetite to do deals throughout the history of our company. But there's also a little bit of like a professional pride that we like to build things and do things kind of on our own. We kind of think about it a little bit like if there is a network that we could easily acquire through an acquisition, we would do that. If there's a piece of technology that's easier for us to buy than build, we will do that. We're obviously going to be like super nimble. In this environment, we're going to be price-sensitive in a way that I think everyone here would expect us to be. But at the same time, I think there's a moment where there's clearly moments for kind of consolidation and scale. And so we're kind of pretty focused on the space.

Robert Warshaw

executive
#30

Yes. I think that we really said that core of it which is we've been very successful in organically investing in things that we think are interesting and getting to the place where we need to get a time frame that makes sense. But there's this list. And so what we're doing is -- this is mainly the first year really as a public company. Last year was about becoming public and making sure that we had all the mechanical pieces in place. There's some drags on cash at that point because that's part of what happens when you're at that junction point. This is kind of our first year out. And I think we will -- we're returning some money to investors today in terms of dividends. But we've got a dividend story we're not expecting to be, I don't think. What we're expecting to do is as we accumulate capacity, whether that's cash, whether that's our capital structure in general, whether it's the revolving credit facility we put in place and how we might use it, that we be smart, we take advantage of the market in a smart way and we progressively look with that business, corporate development teams in the U.S., Europe and Asia. And we aggressively look at what our opportunities, but we make sure that they meet our requirements, which is network, product, geography or some form of technology piece that we think we can bypass and get advantage faster than when we grow and that -- and the fundamentals make sense. And we kind of have a history of the things Billy talked about. We think we did appropriate good deals in those situations. The market's a little heated, maybe we can benefit from that at some levels, but the reality of it is that we're not going to overpay for something if we think we can get there a different way.

Arinash Ghosh

analyst
#31

Yes. Any particular areas that look attractive, either to add scale or get into a new line that you're currently only not into? And maybe overlap that with the way you think about strategy around M&A when it comes to the strategic partnerships because you've done that as well recently, where you've gone strategic partnership route with open gamut [indiscernible]. Like when you think about product gaps, what's that idea of [indiscernible]? What would make you say let's go the strategic partnership route versus a wholesale buy or something?

Robert Warshaw

executive
#32

I think it depends on opportunities, obviously. Strategic partnerships tend to happen because both sides get something they want out of it, and both sides have needs and one or the other side doesn't have -- necessarily interested in doing a transaction because it wouldn't make sense because there's other parts of the business that aren't necessarily perfect matches for what we might want to manage or grow in our case or for them in terms of independence and all that, that they may want to do so. I think that each one has its own flavor in terms of how it gets -- how we've come to that. But we're going to continue to look for opportunities, particularly where it's around gathering data or gathering the use of -- the ability to apply analytics to things of places where there are incumbents who benefit from joining with us to do those things. And we benefit by having better information on our screens or better underlying calculations are that feed the trading process, which is our primary objective. So I think that's key. I think on why it didn't work -- [indiscernible] in acquisitions, as I said, it's really kind of to purpose, where something that kind of has a bigger lift to us in terms of potentially the other things I've talked about, which is network and geography and product, and it would have the kind of impact that we would be in terms of growth versus maybe adding a capability. What we don't want to do is end up managing a company where there's a nice capability but it's kind of not our primary -- the primary thing we do. And so we're going to benefit from the capability, but not necessarily help that engine grow in the way it needs to in other ways. And so we don't want to just sort of attach things because we decided to -- we'd rather own it and partner with it when partnering is the better outcome.

Arinash Ghosh

analyst
#33

Now that makes sense. And then maybe with a couple minutes left on the clock. Just -- you touched on data. Maybe talk about your medium-term vision for data and the way it plays in your business. Again, it's a broad kind of term. But clearly, investing in data strategy, a lot of that is internally focused to drive activity on your level. So as we think about distribution outside of your -- the Refinitiv channel, product that you can monetize over time, how do you see that play out?

William Hult

executive
#34

So I'll answer quickly. I guess the clock is kind of ticking a little bit, but I'll say it kind of in an interesting way, I think maybe in 2 ways. One is I think everyone in this room can understand that we feel very confident that we're sitting on some really interesting kind of data opportunities. It can't be in all the businesses that we are in, and then you think about the fact that we're obviously in the institutional business, the wholesale business and the retail business. And between the collective group here, we could all understand that there's a lot of different ways to kind of splice and show and be creative around data. Period. That being said, we don't forget that we have like a day job, and that day job is trade execution. And so we are relentless about making sure that the integrity of our trade execution platform has 100% confidence of the community, and we will never do anything around trade data that circumvents or undermine any of the integrity that we have achieved through all these years of being in business. And that's an important piece of the whole data story. Sometimes it doesn't get pulled as much as it should.

Arinash Ghosh

analyst
#35

Got it. With that, we're out of time. So Billy, Bob, thank you so much for being here.

William Hult

executive
#36

Yes. Thank you very much.

Robert Warshaw

executive
#37

Thanks, everyone.

William Hult

executive
#38

Thank you very much.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Tradeweb Markets Inc. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Tradeweb Markets Inc. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.