TransAlta Corporation (TA) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
July 31, 2026
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Operator
operatorGood morning. My name is Michelle, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the TransAlta Corporation Second Quarter 2026 Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Ms. Paris, you may begin your conference.
Stephanie Paris
executiveThank you, Michelle. Good morning, everyone. My name is Stephanie Paris, and I am the Vice President of Investor Relations and Corporate Strategy of TransAlta. Welcome to TransAlta's Second Quarter 2026 Conference Call. With me today are Joel Hunter, President and Chief Executive Officer; Mike Politeski, EVP Finance and Chief Financial Officer; and Chris Fralick, EVP Generation and Chief Operating Officer. Today's call is being webcast, and I invite those listening on the phone lines to view the supporting slides that are posted on our website. A replay of the call will be made available later today, and the transcript will be posted to our website shortly thereafter. All the information provided during this conference call is subject to the forward-looking statement qualification settled here on Slide 2, detailed further in our MD&A and incorporated in full for purposes of today's call. All amounts referenced are in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted. The non-IFRS terminology used, including adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow are reconciled in the MD&A for your reference. On today's call, Joel and Mike will provide an overview of TransAlta's quarterly results. After these remarks, we will open the call for questions. With that, I will turn the call over to Joel.
Joel Hunter
executiveThanks, Stephanie. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining our second quarter conference call. TransAlta delivered solid operational and financial performance during the second quarter of 2026, demonstrating our fleet's continued resilience during challenging market conditions. During the quarter, we delivered adjusted EBITDA of $291 million, free cash flow of $143 million or $0.47 per share and average fleet availability of 90.2%. While our Alberta merchant portfolio continues to be impacted by softer prices, our hedging strategy and active asset optimization generated realized prices that were well above spot prices during the quarter, along with our hydro and wind assets providing significant environmental offsets to our gas fleets 2025 carbon compliance obligation. We remain confident in achieving our 2026 guidance range, which Mike will talk about later. In the quarter, we continued to advance our data center strategy with CPP investments in Brookfield. More broadly in Alberta, positive recent developments reinforce the momentum and collective commitment across government and industry to develop AI infrastructure. In particular, in June, the government of Alberta published their data center regulations, giving authority to the ASO to proceed with the next phase of the large load integration plan. The regulation includes provisions that permit the ASO to determine underutilized capacity that can be used to serve incremental data center load. Consistent with our messaging at Investor Day, we believe that our gas-fired steam units constitute underutilized generation that can support both grid reliability and the continued build-out of AI infrastructure in the province. Our gas-fired steam units are designed to operate as baseload and can produce at capacity factors greater than 90%. The recent performance and lower capacity factors averaging around 20% in 2025 have been driven by economic decisions, not capability. Speed to power is critical, and we view the data center regulations is an important step towards framework clarity. The determination on how unutilized assets will be incorporated into the build-out of AI infrastructure will be made by the ASO, and we remain actively engaged with them. Also in the quarter, we fully integrated the 4 gas-fired facilities in connection with the acquisition of -- for North -- in June, the U.S. Department of Energy issued its third temporary order requiring that Central Unit 2 remain available for operation, if needed, for a period of 90 days. TransAlta is adhering to the order, and we plan to submit a request for reimbursement to the FERC for costs related to the second order. Progress continues with the conversion of the unit to natural gas, and I am pleased to report that our time line for a final investment decision in the first quarter of 2027 remains on schedule. Last month, we announced that TransAlta has entered into an agreement to acquire 2 natural gas-fired peaking facilities in Colorado for USD 1 billion paired with a common share offering for $350 million. Both assets are fully contracted to investment-grade counterparties under long-term polling agreements that include full cost pass-through of all operations and maintenance, fuel and capital expenses, which meaningfully reduced the risk profile of the acquired assets. The acquisition is expected to deliver $110 million per year in low-risk, high-quality adjusted EBITDA to our portfolio and is immediately accretive to free cash flow per share. We expect closing to occur in the fourth quarter following receipt of all regulatory approvals as well as Canning Peak Power achieving commercial operations. Adding stable operating assets like this delivers immediate cash flow that can be redeployed into our most compelling growth initiatives, including the Centrale coal-to-gas conversion and Alberta data center projects. And finally, we realigned our executive management team, adding Mike Politeski, as our EVP, Finance and Chief Financial Officer; and Grant Arnold is our EVP Growth and Chief Commercial Officer. In addition, Nancy Brennan assumed an expanded role as Chief Legal People and Corporate Affairs Officer; and Chris Felix, new title is EVP, Generation and Chief Operating Officer. Supported by an exceptional team across the organization, I am confident that we have the right people and structure to execute our strategy and realize long-term value creation for TransAlta. I'll now turn the call over to Mike to talk more about our financial performance in the second quarter of 2026.
Mike Politeski
executiveThanks, Joel. Good morning, everyone. During the quarter, we generated adjusted EBITDA of $291 million despite challenging market pricing in Alberta. Our Hydro segment adjusted EBITDA was $87 million, down $39 million from the same quarter in 2025 due to lower Alberta spot and hedge prices as well as lower intercompany sales of emissions credits. Our Wind and Solar segment reported adjusted EBITDA of $90 million consistent with the prior year, as higher U.S. wind resource mitigated lower Alberta pricing and reduced wind resource in Eastern Canada. Within our Gas segment, adjusted EBITDA was $14 million higher than the prior year due to strong optimization of our Alberta fleet and positive contributions from our Far North acquisition. Consistent with prior years, our second quarter results benefited from the realization of emissions credits against our prior year carbon obligation. For the balance of 2026, we expect additional contributions to our segments from the realization of carbon credits against in-year carbon compliance costs. Our energy marketing adjusted EBITDA decreased by $16 million primarily due to subdued market volatility in Western power markets and lower realized gains within the quarter. We expect to have more gains realized by year-end as favorable trade positions settle. In our Corporate segment, costs were 8% lower than the prior year due to initiatives to control spend. And finally, our Energy Transition segment adjusted EBITDA was lower than the prior year due to the Centralia contract expiry at the end of 2025. We also generated strong free cash flow during the second quarter, totaling $143 million. Our sustaining capital expenditures were down $18 million year-over-year however, this was primarily timing related, and we continue to expect sustaining capital of $140 million to $160 million in 2026. Turning to the Alberta portfolio. Spot prices averaged $29 per megawatt hour in the second quarter, notably lower than the $40 per megawatt hour in the second quarter of 2025. The decline was primarily due to seasonally lower demand and continued strong supply in the market. Although prices were low, we enhanced our margins by meeting portions of our higher-priced hedge commitments through power purchases when market prices were below our variable production costs. We benefited from approximately 2,400 gigawatt hours of hedges at an average price of $63 per megawatt hour which was $34 per megawatt higher than the average spot price. Our gas fleet realized an average price of $68 per megawatt hour, a significant 134% premium to the average spot price largely due to our dispatch optimization during high-priced hours, which materially raised our realized price. The hydro fleet also continues to capture merchant upside delivering an average realized price of $36 per megawatt hour, a 24% premium to the average spot price. Our merchant wind fleet realized an average price of $14 per megawatt hour which was impacted by increased thermal production and intermittent wind and solar generation. During the quarter, we also delivered approximately 900 gigawatt hours of ancillary service volumes at a 14% premium to the average spot price. Through effective fleet optimization and meeting hedge obligations with purchase power, we consistently address the ASOs need for reliability products. We continue to have a strong hedge book to support our Alberta cash flows -- for the balance of the year, we have approximately 4,500 gigawatt hours of our Alberta generation hedged at an average price of $64 per megawatt hour, well above current forward pricing. For 2027, we have approximately 6,600 gigawatt hours hedged at an average price of $64 per megawatt hour, also well above current forward levels. Looking ahead, we continue to expect the Alberta supply demand imbalance will correct later this decade with anticipated load growth. We believe we are well positioned to manage through the current pricing environment and to capture growth opportunities to drive long-term value creation for our shareholders. Turning to the balance sheet. In June, Moody's reaffirmed our Ba1 credit rating with a stable outlook. And last week, S&P reaffirmed our BB+ rating while shifting the outlook to negative. We remain committed to strengthening our balance sheet through multiple levers, including asset recycling. In addition, the forecast tightening of the Alberta market and recovery of power prices along with the expected cash flows from Centralia after conversion will provide cash flow growth to further strengthen our financial position. Overall, we are pleased with our year-to-date operational and financial performance across all our business segments, and we remain confident in our ability to meet our 2026 guidance range. Our contracted fleet strong hedge position and consistent optimization provide us with core cash flows even in a low merchant power pricing environment. The Colorado acquisition is not factored into our reaffirmation of guidance and upon closing, which is expected in the fourth quarter of 2026, will add to our financial results. I'll now turn the call back over to Joel.
Joel Hunter
executiveThanks, Mike. This will remain focused on the following priorities: improving our leading and lagging safety performance indicators while achieving strong fleet availability, delivering adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow within our 2026 guidance ranges, maximizing the value of our legacy thermal sites by advancing our Alberta data center strategy as well as advancing our coal-to-gas conversion Centria toward a final investment decision, pursuing strategic M&A opportunities, and enhancing our financial strength and flexibility through disciplined capital allocation and cost control. I believe TransAlta offers a compelling investment opportunity. We have operated a safe and reliable power generation fleet for over 115 years, providing strong and consistent cash flows. This strength is grounded in a diversified portfolio of hydro, wind, solar, storage and thermal assets across 3 countries that is enhanced by our industry-leading asset optimization and energy marketing capabilities. Our legacy sites continue to represent considerable and increasing value. We are proactively pursuing repurposing initiatives at these facilities to address the growing demand for reliable power in our operating markets. Concurrently, we maintain a leadership position across multiple technologies, consistently prioritizing responsible and reliable generation. We are disciplined in how we grow. Our priority is creating shareholder value as we diversify our portfolio within our core geographies and continue to increase the stability and contracted nature of our cash flows. This strategy is supported by a strong financial foundation, -- we have a flexible balance sheet and ample liquidity, giving us the ability to pursue and deliver multiple growth opportunities for continued to return capital to shareholders. And finally, and most importantly, we have our people, -- everything we achieve is powered by the dedication and expertise of our employees and contractors. I want to thank them for their commitment and for positioning TransAlta for continued success in 2026 and beyond. Thank you, and I'll now turn the call back over to Stephanie.
Stephanie Paris
executiveThank you, Joel. Michelle, would you please open the call for questions from the analysts.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] Our first question is going to come from the line of Mark Jarvi with CIBC.
Mark Jarvi
analystJust in terms of those discussions with the ASO and the unrealized assets, do you have any sense of when you might have clarity and just how that's impacting anything about getting from the MOU to a definitive agreement with Brookfield and CPP.
Joel Hunter
executiveYes. Thanks, Mark. It's Joel here. I would say there's ongoing discussions with ASO. And again, we are very encouraged as I mentioned in our prepared remarks, by the data center regulations that really turn over to the -- as to determine what is underutilized capacity here as it relates to our -- really our gas-fired steam units -- so again, we're working with them very collaboratively here as we move forward. I would say with the MOU and the definitive agreements that we have with CPPI investments in Brookfield, those continue to advance as we highlighted when we announced the MOU back in February. So again, working alongside those 2 parties, and we continue to remain very confident in our ability to bring forward our data center option here later in the year.
Mark Jarvi
analystSo the expectation is a matter of months? Could it be a couple of quarters before you have clarity on the underutilized assets.
Joel Hunter
executiveHard to say. We can't really speak for the ASO mark, but we are actively engaged with them. So we're hopeful it will be in the next quarter or so, but we can't speak on behalf of them as to the timing.
Mark Jarvi
analystAnd then obviously, that might influence how you think about scaling beyond the 230 megawatts. So if that drags on a little bit, hopefully, it doesn't. Would you look at moving to like FID on the first phase of the 230 megawatts from Phase 1 allocation and then subsequent scale-up after that through a follow-on agreement? Or is there a way to sequence sort of, I guess, moving through FID?
Joel Hunter
executiveI think that's very possible here, Mark, that we would look to that. Again, and it's really up to us along with Brookfield and CPPI to determine that. But -- as we said before, 230, we were very pleased with that in the Phase I allocation and then looking forward to what -- how we can build upon that -- so I'd say that there's a possibility here that, that could advance the 230 before the remaining here with the underutilized capacity.
Operator
operatorOur next question is going to come from the line of Maurice Choy with RBC Capital Markets.
Maurice Choy
analystJust wanted to touch on any updates you have on the asset recycling initiatives that was mentioned earlier to reduce debt? Where are some of the things that are influencing the timing and perhaps selection of some of these assets for sale?
Joel Hunter
executiveYes. Thanks, Maurice. We are very active. We have a few that are well underway. Obviously, we can't give everything away here as we're in processes, if you will. I think what you'll see going forward here, Maurice, just given the amount of opportunities that we see going forward, whether it's a central coal-to-gas conversion, AI data centers, M&A opportunities and then further kind of organic growth in our portfolio that we're seeing that I think portfolio rotation will become more active here. So we do have a few processes underway. I can't say anything more, but we are certainly very active in that space right now.
Maurice Choy
analystLooking forward to hear more of that. And if I could just finish off with just a more broad discussion about for power prices. I think over the last few weeks, since all these announcements were made. We've seen oil prices move up a little bit, particularly for 2029. Yet it still is below the $80 to $120 million range that you laid out at Investor Day. You mentioned at the start of the call that you've seen a lot of positive developments in the province thus far. So just curious as to what else you're expecting to hear in the coming months that would prompt the forwards to rise into your projected range?
Joel Hunter
executiveFirst of all, Maurice, when you look out further, like the Cal 28 and Cal 29, there isn't a lot of liquidity. Generally, when you look at kind of forward pricing you're 12 to maybe 18 months at best. And when I look at Cal 29 today, I think it's marked around $81. So it is actually in the range of that $80 million to $120 million that we highlighted at Investor Day. And certainly, we've seen an improvement in those forward prices since even the announcement with Meta around their data center project with Connecticore and Pembina. So we remain very encouraged by that. I think for the market, as we move forward here, just getting further kind of clarity around the ramping of the load growth will certainly support further the forward pricing. So again, when I look at where we are today for Cal 29 from where we were at Packet Investor Day at the end of March, we've certainly seen an improvement there. But I would expect that over time, as the market has better visibility behind kind of the load ramp. If you will, that will then further support these forward prices and could even go higher.
Maurice Choy
analystMaybe on that last note and a quick follow-up here. Obviously, we know where 1 is in the province, but also historically, when we had, I think it on to 2023 when we had triple-digit power prices that led to the regulator looking more into the industry. In this world of affordability, like is there such thing as a balanced number where pretty much everyone is happy.
Joel Hunter
executiveYes. When you look at the -- again, the con or the cost new entry that you referred to, and I know that, that was something that was highlighted with the recent announcement from Pembina Connecticor kind of in the low 100s, if you will which completely makes sense, right, given the cost of new build that we're seeing today relative to even where we were back in 2021 and 2023 as a reference where we saw triple-digit pricing. Again, this, I think, is where it's really important to have kind of legacy generation like we have with our gas-fired steam units to help support the infrastructure buildout that we've talked about that, that pricing would be below cone. But what you're seeing here going forward is the market will continue to tighten -- we're not seeing much by way of new supply, but we're obviously seeing load growth coming, whether it's organically in the province as we highlighted at our Investor Day back in March, along with Phase 1 here -- so we can't say exactly where that price point would be. But I think when you look at Alberta relative to other jurisdictions in North America, we remain very cheap given the surplus generation that we see here. And again, I think it really supports why legacy generation should be utilized just given that it is at a price that is below 1 that we're seeing today. But going forward, it will be -- what it will be, if you will, as it relates to if there's new generation required and given the cost of that new generation to ensure that the generation provider is earning a full return of on capital. The price will be what it is. And so again, I can't say exactly where that price point would be where there was maybe some kind of I think, concern around power prices overall for consumers. The other thing to remind yourself is that when you look at Alberta, when you look at the average power bill, roughly 1/3 is really the price of the electron and 2/3 is really through the transmission and distribution costs. So to the extent you see additional load come, what you'd hope to see is that the transmission and distribution costs are kind of butter spread more evenly given the additional load here. So that has to be taken into factor. It's just not the cost of power at the end of the day that impacts consumers. It's all these other costs as well.
Operator
operatorOur next question is going to come from the line of Robert Hope with Scotiabank.
Robert Hope
analystSo I appreciate the commentary on the asset sales potentially strengthening the balance sheet with an acknowledge that you may be limited on what you can say. But that being said, how do you think about an asset sale program when you have quite a large uncertainty out there regarding the Brookfield Hydro option and the potential for it to top up and provide what could be a significant amount of capital for TA.
Joel Hunter
executiveYes, Rob, I think it's both. When we look at how we further strengthen the balance sheet here, we certainly factor at some point in time, we can't predict when, but the adoption that Brookfield has to convert into the hydro here in Alberta. That's 1 piece of it and certainly would only get the cash infusion that would come in from a potential top-up, but also $750 million of debt that would essentially come off the balance sheet as it relates to the rating agencies. So that's 1 important factor or a lever, if you will, to strengthen the balance sheet. But I think it's all of it. It's also doing additional asset sales because what we're seeing there is just tremendous opportunities for our company. As I mentioned earlier, you think about the Central gas conversion has been 1 the M&A opportunities that we're seeing out there, like we did with the Colorado acquisition here just over a month ago, along with just other kind of greenfield opportunities that we're seeing in our portfolio that might be further down in the decade, if you will, that will require capital. So certainly, there's no shortage of uses of capital, if you will, so as we look at how we can strengthen our balance sheet, provide incremental cash to the balance sheet, it's obviously Brookfield conversion is factored there on top of asset recycling.
Robert Hope
analystAppreciate that. And then maybe just going back to some prior commentary on the BYOD process as well as the commentary on repurposing some assets. When you think about your asset fleet in Alberta, how do you think about the decision tree of using, we'll call it, your steam conversions on an interim basis as a bridge to, we'll call it, a larger brownfield expansion of your project? And how do you work through the uncertainty of you don't quite know what the ACA will ultimately land on.
Joel Hunter
executiveYes. I think part of this is, first is really landing on how much capacity as you said, of the gas-fired steam units that we can use or would constitute underutilized or bring your own generation, if you will. That's the first part here that is part of that decision tree -- and so obviously, there can be a wide range there, given that we have a very sizable gas-fired steam fleet here. And as I mentioned in my remarks, the capacity factor has been around 20% as it relates to 2025. So we do see excess capacity there that could be used as bring your own generation. And what I really like about that is for the data center or AI infrastructure build-out is, as you know, the cost of new build is just so expensive today, and the supply chain constraints are so challenging that using these units to support the AI infrastructure build-out will then lead to new build sometime next decade because these units won't run forever. So it is in a way kind of like a bridge. I don't like to use that term, but that's kind of what this would be is that you get the AI infrastructure built in the province, supported by our existing gas-fired steam units. And then at some point in time, we would look to then repower those units so they can run for decades after that. So that's -- again, I see this is where it's very compelling for Alberta as it relates to the fact that we do have surplus generation. The supply chain constraints that we see that this fits really nicely that we could use this gas-fired steam units but then there would be a new build down the road that would be underpinned by long-term contracts with our customers.
Operator
operatorOur next question will come from the line of John Mould with TD Securities.
John Mould
analystMaybe just a follow-on on that last question. On the repowering projects that you have and I guess, pole as well on the greenfield side, I guess how active are you on those in terms of costing activities, planning, just to be in a position to proceed rapidly with those. If there is some kind of meaningful load growth that drives the need for those? Or should investors really think of those as more of a longer-dated option into the next decade, depending on how -- like possibly well into the next decade, you flagged the time line of the coal gas retirements in the past. Like just in terms of maybe meeting the provinces, load growth more on a long-term basis.
Joel Hunter
executiveYes, John, when you look -- when you reference Flipp and KPL and SUN5, the total is just over 2 gigawatts I'd say there's still a lot of work going on today. It's still very early days. But again, you can see as part of our path forward here. First step is utilizing the underutilized capacity we have with our gas-fired steam units. That makes the most sense and then look to potentially build out these sites, if you will, next decade. So it's not something that we'd look to be building tomorrow, so we don't need to. The most effective way is to use the gas-fired steam units, they're the most cost effective, and it's all about speed to power too, for AI infrastructure -- the assets are there. As you know, the gas is there, the transmission is there, the waters there. Everything is there. So use those first. But knowing, again, as mentioned earlier, they're not going to run forever. And then look to these sites like whether it's WipK1 or SunFas we talked about, as to repower down the road. So that's kind of -- it's kind of a stage process here. So it's certainly something we're not looking at doing tomorrow. This would be next decade. But the work is underway now because these take a long time, right, to do all the planning, the stakeholder engagement, all those things that's underway. But we do have a bit of time here because we view really repurposing our gas-fired steam units is the way to go.
John Mould
analystAnd then maybe just on your hedges, you layered on about, I think, 20% or so incrementally just in terms of volume for next year. What kind of appetite are you seeing from customers to contract at more normalized pricing levels versus holding on to something more like the spot exposure today? And just in terms of how that contributes to your ability to add more meaningful length to your hedges between now and the end of the year?
Joel Hunter
executiveYes. We've -- John, obviously, we always remain very active as it relates to our matching our hedge portfolio. Roughly half of the portfolio is our C&I business, which is -- think of those as almost like 3-year contracts that continue to roll kind of every year. And those tend to transacted a bit of a premium over where you would see like the forward pricing. So the team looks for opportunities here where there's a nice spread that they see that they go, we're going to lock in these prices. So I'm very encouraged by what the team has done so far -- if you look at 1 of our slides, when we show that for next year, we have around 700 gigawatt hours already hedged at $64, again, well above where we're at today. When we look at kind of spot pricing, and that's due in large part to our C&I business, along with adding financial hedges where we can. So this is something that it's a real core competency, if you will, of TransAlta that they look for these opportunities to kind of lock in when they can. And I expect that will continue to roll in hedges here going forward. And I can't say how much, but they will find opportunities. And again, a large part of that is due to the C&I book that we have.
Operator
operatorOur next question is a follow-up question from the line of Mark Jarvi with CIBC.
Mark Jarvi
analystJust following up on the unutilized assets. If you got a meaningful amount granted by the ASO like a gigawatt or more, would that likely be used to scale up increased opportunities around key pills? Or are there conversations opportunities to look at another site like Sundance?
Joel Hunter
executiveRight now, Mark, we are focused around key pills that depending on what the ultimate number is that we certainly have the land there. The gas supply is there. The transmission is there to support additional build-out. So if you talk to a or even higher. Certainly, that could be supported around the Key pills facility.
Operator
operatorOur next question is going to come from the line of Patrick Kennedy with National Bank Capital Markets.
Patrick Kenny
analystI know you guys are still working on the Class 3 estimate for the Centralia Unit 2. But just wondering if perhaps there's been any progress with potentially tapping into more gas supply and looking at repowering Unit 1, how we should be thinking about the timing of that opportunity? And maybe a comment on how those brownfield returns might stack up to, say, Alberta greenfield or other U.S. M&A opportunities?
Joel Hunter
executiveYes, Tod. When we look at with Centralia, as you highlighted, we are working toward the Class III estimate, everything is on schedule such that we'll be in a position to have that by the end of the year. It to be then on track to make the FID very early in 2027, again, subject to the permits that are required both for ourselves and obviously with PSC to get the WTC approval. So that work is well underway there at the facility. It is -- when you look at the returns, I mean, hard to beat. As we highlighted when we made the announcement for Centralia, we said kind of our estimate is a $600 million capital cost at a 5.5x build multiple. So obviously very attractive. I wish we have -- like any company wish we had more of those types of opportunities with those types of multiples. So again, very, very attractive. And again, just shows the value of having legacy assets where you can either repurpose maybe extend a contract or what have you that offer a very compelling risk-adjusted returns. When you look at the gas supply, just recall that the gas supply for Unit 2, that's on for PSC as the customer to provide not only the gas but the transportation of that gas to the facility, and there is enough gas supply there. The gas line is around 1,500 feet away from the facility. So it is very close. As it relates to Unit 1, I think this is a longer-term option because we've been having discussions around that, but very, very early days that it would be very compelling given the -- where the location, given the transmission is there, the water is there. You are 85 miles south of Seattle. So there's a lot of reasons why it would be very good to be able to expand that facility. It comes down to, again, gas supply. It's the Northwest Williams Northwest pipeline that is full today, but certainly something that we're talking to them on and then also just trying to find, obviously, a customer like a commercial arrangement. But again, very, very early days, and this would be kind of next decade, but we do see that there could be an option there, but I wouldn't put a high probability at this point in time. And the focus, again, is on getting Unit 2 to FID early next year and moving that project along to get it in service by the fourth quarter of 2028.
Patrick Kenny
analystOkay. That's perfect. And then maybe just on the M&A front, obviously, I know you can't comment on specific opportunities. But just curious, after the Colorado transaction closes, how you might describe your wish list in terms of geography, asset type or technology, fuel supply. Just how you're thinking about maximizing the value of the portfolio going forward through M&A, whether it's capturing synergies across the portfolio or otherwise?
Joel Hunter
executiveYes, Pat, no. Again, we're very, very pleased with the Colorado acquisition. I think this is an acquisition that will serve our shareholders for decades to come, given the weighted average duration is 27 years. And as we've talked about before, the full cost pass-through that we have there. So a very low-risk investment for us that, again, in a core geography that now we have a presence in Colorado with these 2 facilities. So we're very, very happy with that. Going forward, though, the M&A strategy remains the same, focused on our 4 card geographies. So you have seen us transact the Heartland acquisition was here in Alberta -- had acquisition was in Ontario and then this most recent 1 in Colorado. I would say with technology, we remain agnostic. It's all about the highest risk-adjusted returns. That's the key for us. And so it just so happens recently, it's been more in the gas-fired side of things. When you look at again Hue, you look at Colorado, you look at Heartland. But if there's opportunities in renewables, we're certainly looking at those as well. But again, it comes down to the highest risk-adjusted returns in our 4 key geographies. So we remain very active there but we're also conscious of our balance sheet and what we can do. And this is where, again, I think, as we talked about earlier, active asset optimization, if you were a portfolio rotation certainly would support those opportunities going forward. So it's really kind of more of the same, if you will, as it relates to how we look at M&A.
Operator
operatorOur next question will come from the line of Benjamin Pham with BMO.
Benjamin Pham
analystI want to follow up on our last question around your comments on risk-adjusted returns across the portfolio, including M&A. And can you pass a little bit because it sounds like if you're going on different risk profiles with an energy infrastructure that return spectrum most changed quite a bit, i.e., the Colorado transaction where it's long-dated cash flows and the return may be a different profile than maybe some later assets. Can you maybe put the bookends of the returns and how you adjust for the risk differences?
Joel Hunter
executiveYes. I'd say, Ben, when we look at the various opportunities, so I'll just give you some relevant examples here. You look at the Heartland acquisition, were not fully contracted, but substantially contracted here in Alberta, older vintage assets, and we did that at around 5.4x multiple. When you look at hot As, again, older assets, shorter contracts, but we believe we'll be able to recontract those assets for -- in 5-year increments. Again, we were able to acquire those at a lower multiple. When you look at Colorado, yes, it was a higher multiple, but it makes a lot of sense, right, that this is brand-new generation, 27-year contracts -- so we have to look at this on a kind of overall portfolio that you're going to get some at a lower multiple, and there's reasons for that. And there's going to be some like Colorado, where it's going to be at a higher multiple that is fair value given, again, the vintage of the assets given the contracts and the nature of those contracts and the like. So when we look at our opportunities here going forward. You have to take that all into consideration. I think what was important for Colorado is I know some folks looked at really the multiple -- that's 1 way to look at it, but probably the best way to look at it is really the free cash flow yield. The free cash flow yield on that acquisition is approximately 13% and our free cash flow yield at TA is around 7%. So it's free cash flow accretive at the end of the day. So for us, there's a number of ways we look at acquisitions, whether it's EV-EBITDA multiple to free the leverage that's on the acquired assets, if any, so there's kind of a wide range here. But I think -- and then you have to compare everything on a per share basis as well, too, right? So that we want to be accretive. At the end of the day, we don't want to do anything that is dilutive, and Colorado was accretive, as I mentioned. So everything has to stack up against -- on a per share metric basis. So hopefully, it gives you some context of how we look at things. Here, it really depends on the nature of the acquisition.
Benjamin Pham
analystOkay. Got it. And can you comment really just with some of the credit rating updates, does that constrain your ability at all to your balance sheet to add on more M&A over the next 12 months? I can just pay your time.
Mike Politeski
executiveThank you. Ben, it's Mike here. Maybe I'll handle this one. Yes, so the negative outlook from S&P, we kind of view that as a temporary hurdle for us -- when you look at the soft Alberta power pricing market right now and Centralia being offline here as we progress that towards FID, our cash flows have come down. But we do see a glide path forward with the recovery of the balance sheet. And when you look at the Alberta forward pricing market, you're starting to benefit of that is obviously proceeds in the door helping the balance sheet. So we see a lot of incremental things that will progress the balance sheet to a position where we want it to be in. In the meantime, is it hampering our flexibility, I would say, no, not really. The thing pursuing right now, we have the flexibility to operate within the bounds of our balance sheet. But we are definitely conscious of the leverage levels and how the rating agencies are viewing it. And we see that improving here over the next while and it's something we are actively working towards.
Benjamin Pham
analystOkay. That's a quick 1 for me to squeeze if I may. You mentioned the work on the focus on details with respect to the data center opportunities. Can you remind me, when you went through the multiphase process with that asset, was it community engagement in well, I know it's industrial side and there's a plant there. Do you do that and work here just the community feedback and support or lack of support for site?
Joel Hunter
executiveYes, Ben. Whenever we have any investment that we make, we have community engagement our stakeholder engagement early on right at the development stage and really through the whole life cycle of the asset. So once the asset is developed and then operating -- we stay in the community. We remain very engaged with the community because again, we're an important part of these communities in which we operate in. So when you look at Key pills, we are, again, very actively engaged there within the community. There is certainly a lot of support there at Key pills, just given the infrastructure is there today. It's been there for many decades. But we have to remain very active there and really bring our stakeholders along with us on this journey when we develop any project. And it's not only gets here in Alberta. It's anywhere in which we operate stakeholder engagement is just critical and through, like I said, development and through the operating life of the assets. So again, we are very engaged there. It's really important that we are very transparent with our stakeholders, we have transparent communication. It's really important that we have that because these are our stakeholders. And so we want to make sure that we are communicating with them, we're listening to them, understanding what their needs and their concerns are because it really is almost like a partnership then the day when you are putting infrastructure into a community. And I would say with key pills, we're certainly very, very active.
Operator
operatorThank you, everyone. That concludes our call for today. If you have any further questions, please contact the TransAlta Investor Relations team. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete TransAlta Corporation transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to TransAlta Corporation earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.