TransMedics Group, Inc. (TMDX) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 17, 2020

NASDAQ US Health Care Health Care Equipment and Supplies conference_presentation 29 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

David Lewis

analyst
#1

Well, good morning, and welcome to Day 4 of the Morgan Stanley Healthcare Conference 2020. My name is David Lewis, medical device analyst at Morgan Stanley. We appreciate your attendance throughout these last four days. We've got another very exciting day here on Day 4, really focusing on some mid-cap emerging technology companies, and I'm delighted to have with us here to start the day, one of those -- such companies, TransMedics. We've got their CEO, Waleed Hassanein; and Stephen Gordon, their CFO. We're going to dispense with the preamble. We're going to get straight into Q&A.

David Lewis

analyst
#2

And now, Waleed, it's interesting. Transplantation is a bit of a -- every company has reacted to COVID recovery differently. I think initially, people said, "Hey, transplantation is something that cannot be deferred, but yet these patients are immunocompromised. So COVID has impacted your business in particularly unique ways." Help us understand how COVID has impacted your business? And then more specifically, how you've seen recovery here month-over-month as you came out of this summer?

Waleed Hassanein

executive
#3

Yes, David, thank you for having us today. Like many other companies, COVID impacted transplantation in a few different ways. First, in -- during the peak in April, early May, really, we saw transplantation stop almost completely in the hot zones, and it was sporadic in areas that did not have peaks at the time. Also, COVID resulted in this sense of fear or, in some instance, concerns about sending out retrieval teams to procure organs. We did not see necessarily that the donor numbers declining significantly, but we saw donor retrieval declining precipitously through April and May. The good news is, as we continue throughout the year and where we are here today, we've seen recovery continues. We're continuing to see recoveries through Q2 and Q3. And we hope that barring any second wave of -- of a second peak here that transplant will be back to full normal by the end of the year. That's the case where we -- that's what we see -- where we sit. The other thing that was interesting from COVID is because of that dip in organ transplant numbers, it put a lot of pressures on institutions from a number of procedure standpoint. So we're hoping to see a push in the second half of the year really into Q4 for some of these major institutions to try to recover or recoup some of their organ transplant numbers that they lost in Q2. But it's yet to be determined. And again, this is all barring a second peak in Q4.

David Lewis

analyst
#4

Okay. That's very helpful, Waleed. So right now, where would you say we are from kind of a percent of [ normal ] perspective? I feel like most medical device companies ended June, I don't know, somewhere around 85% to 90% of normal, some were saying as high as 95% of normal. Our model for you was a little behind that, just based on these immunocompromising dynamics that you referred to these care factors, it probably was more like 65%-ish at the end of -- maybe at the end of the second quarter. Where do you think you sit now kind of from a call it percent of normal perspective?

Waleed Hassanein

executive
#5

I think we're in the 80% to 90% range from a U.S. transplant volumes. We're not yet at 100%, but we're definitely making our way up there.

David Lewis

analyst
#6

Okay. And when you said towards end of the year, large academic centers trying to recoup transplant volumes. Obviously, there's a lot of subsectors of medicine where people are trying to recoup lost income. In transplantation, it is no different. And transplantation, it's a little interesting. I feel like in classic medical devices, you can see sort of a backlog. I mean, can there be a backlog effect in transplantation, even though these patients are acutely ill?

Waleed Hassanein

executive
#7

There is a significant backlog. And in the case of transplant, it's actually a formalized backlog. It's called the national waiting list. And the waiting list continued to grow throughout COVID. And when the numbers went down precipitously, what many institutions did is they temporarily delisted their stable patients, so the list doesn't get out of control. Most, if not all of these patients, are back in the waiting list, and that waiting list continues to grow. So there's a significant backlog, and it's a more formal backlog and these patients need an organ transplant. So we expect that backlog or that waiting list to continue to grow.

David Lewis

analyst
#8

Okay. So the concern that these are, unfortunately, critically ill patients that could have expired over the last three to six months, your point is there's still a very substantial backlog with dramatic number of relatively stable patients in that system where this backlog still is relatively fruitful?

Waleed Hassanein

executive
#9

Right.

David Lewis

analyst
#10

Okay. Understood. Okay. There are a couple of things when we think about -- well, before I get to that. I know it's early, Stephen, but like here we've had some companies sort of comment relatively on '21. I wonder maybe just help us on a couple of things, maybe quantitatively or qualitatively as we think about next year? I mean, obviously, you're an emerging growth company. So I've got numbers, '21 over '20 more than doubling and certainly over '19, kind of dramatic improvement. Generally though, the sell-side has numbers more than doubling here in '21. How are you feeling about those numbers as you kind of approach normalcy and think about the momentum in the business? That was number one. And number two, just thinking about your margin progression here, a pretty significant improvement in margin progression '18 to '19. As we see an improvement in revenue, is there any reason to believe you won't see kind of a subsequent significant improvement in GM expansion in '21?

Stephen Gordon

executive
#11

Sure. And maybe, Waleed, if you want to comment on the revenue, I'll comment on the margin. How does that sound?

Waleed Hassanein

executive
#12

That sounds great. So from a revenue perspective, David, we're focusing in the next 12 to 24 months on the key fundamentals that really will catapult our ability to grow the revenue. We have several catalysts over the next 12 to 18 months that all of our attention is focused on those. We have a hard approval, which will position the company as the only platform with a cardiothoracic approval obtained in hand for heart and lung transplant in the U.S. We have the liver approval process that is underway with superiority outcomes. We have -- we're setting up what we believe is going to be the next national gold standard for how organs are retrieved and preserved going forward with these -- with our national OCS perfusion model and across all the FDA-approved devices. We have the kidney indication, hopefully, going into the clinic second half of next year. So that's our focus. And we believe that once we get those under our belt, really, we are in a great position to catapult our growth in revenue. We're not going to comment is it going to double, is it going to be 80%, 90%, 100%, 150%. We need to go through Q4, see where we are. We need to be very cognizant of the COVID dynamic because we know it's going to impact us if a second peak materializes. Our focus is to -- is on things we can control. These are the initiatives and the catalysts that I just described. Once we have that, the ability to grow our revenue exponentially, it becomes a lot more attainable than just trying to sit here and predict when is the FDA approvals going to be in hand, when is liver approvals going to be in hand, and all that has significant material positive impact on our ability to grow our revenue. So Stephen, do you want to take it from there on gross margin?

Stephen Gordon

executive
#13

Yes. I think from a margin perspective, Q1 is really a very good reference point where we had just over $7 million of revenue. We had 65% margin -- gross margin. And I think it's going to track. And so if the revenue is there, I expect gross margin to improve from there. And so as Waleed said, assuming the revenue is growing, we should be meeting our objectives for our gross margin and increasing.

David Lewis

analyst
#14

Okay. Well, there are a couple of business or commercial dynamics that probably were lost within COVID, right? The focus prior to COVID was the lung commercialization and lung expansion. I know it's challenging given the impact of COVID, there were some definite signs of life here first quarter lung improvement post the fourth quarter. Any sense of how you feel like lung commercial traction is going, even though it's been a little murky because of the pandemic?

Waleed Hassanein

executive
#15

It's very murky because of the pandemic. And as I said in the 2Q call, lung has been the most negatively impacted given the COVID focus on lung, given the requirements for ventilators, et cetera. I think it's going to continue to be murky until we have -- for another quarter or two until we have this national service program, that's going to clarify the lung commercial dynamic. That's why we have the next two quarters focusing on that and launching that across major areas in the United States. That's what's going to normalize and kind of put the lung commercial traction back on a more predictable path. And then we get -- that's what we're focusing on is getting that national program kick-started and really start driving lung commercialization from there. We think this is also going to be the foundation for heart commercialization. Once the FDA approves the heart indication, this becomes sort of the platform where we're going to commercialize going forward. I'll give you one example, David. In Q3, we were approached with a handful of new lung centers that we didn't have before. We're no longer asking them to purchase the technology upfront, but we're kind of teeing them up with the service model as the entry way to them being a commercial customer for our lung platform. So that's what we're focusing on throughout Q3, Q4 and into early 2021.

David Lewis

analyst
#16

Okay.

Waleed Hassanein

executive
#17

To get the lung traction back on track and really starting to get back to Q1 and grow that number even from Q1 level.

David Lewis

analyst
#18

Okay. Just two questions here, and we'll move on to some other topics. But Stephen, for you in third quarter, I know it's hard to give guidance, but you've -- if that number reflects kind of flattish trends year-over-year, which feels aggressive for the average medical device company, no one else was guiding kind of flat to growing in the third quarter, but again, you're an emerging growth company and you had some very challenging comparables. Anything you could tell us to kind of help us put third quarter in context here? Because it's almost back to first quarter, it's flat year-on-year. But as you know, there were some -- that third quarter of 2019 had some onetime dynamics?

Stephen Gordon

executive
#19

Yes. I mean, I would -- there's not much I can say. I can say we -- as Waleed mentioned, the uptick has happened from Q2 to Q3, and we feel like we're in the right direction. I don't think there's anything unique about Q3 specifically as far as a seasonal perspective, but we're in this kind of strange kind of reengagement in Q3, and we think we're on the right path. I think it's all I can say.

David Lewis

analyst
#20

Okay. And Waleed, you touched on this commercial service infrastructure. And just update us on where you are? I think that number is sort of 40, 45 people in that commercial organization now. And why that's -- I don't think it's a subtlety to kind of develop kind of right around the IPO, right after the IPO, which may be lost on people in terms of its critical importance, in terms of how you're going to take greater control of helping centers work on their transplantation programs and transition them to OCS? So maybe flesh that out a little bit for people?

Waleed Hassanein

executive
#21

Sure. So I think number 45 is -- I'm not sure that's quite accurate. For us -- let me say differently. For us, our focus and our commercial organization's focus is primarily on signing up and taking over major metropolitan areas for organ preservation, retrieval and perfusion management, it's specifically major organ procurement organizations. I think there is a significant number of those initiatives will be announced publicly over the next quarter or two. And from there, we will grow our headcount to support these initiatives as needed. Right now, we have a core group of about 37 people. And these are the ones we're starting with, and we will add only as we see needed. And we're encouraged and frankly, bullish on this initiative because it gives TransMedics fairly high level of leverage on our ability to perform the vast majority or a significant portion of the transplant volume in the U.S., but more importantly, to increase the organ utilization in the U.S., not relying on a specific center, idiosyncratic behavior or infrastructure or limitation of the infrastructure but we turn it into a more national sharing of organ that could only be delivered on our platform. As you know, at the time of the IPO, this has always been in our commercialization strategy. At the time of the IPO, we felt it's going to be two years out. We pulled it in because we saw that potential. And we're beginning to experience that potential, and we will talk about it at the 3Q call. There's some -- we're beginning to see some tangible evidence of that vision. And we're very excited about where we are and where we're heading with this program. I believe this program is going to be a key driver for our growth catalyst going forward over the next 12 to 18 months.

David Lewis

analyst
#22

Okay. And just to revisit the numbers, I may have missed, but I think it was 35 people at the second quarter, but the target for the end of the year was 45 people or something?

Waleed Hassanein

executive
#23

Yes. We were saying roughly speaking, between 40 and 45. But given the COVID dynamic, David, and given we're being cautious, and we're saying, "Listen, we have a pipeline of perfect candidates." And we dropped them in, in the geographies as we open them up rather than bringing them all in and not finding much to do. So we could be at 40, 41. For me, the number doesn't mean much because I know Tamer has a very robust pipeline of these types of individuals. Once we need them, he'll deploy them, and the rest is going to be to execution.

David Lewis

analyst
#24

But you're a multi-working company, lung, liver and heart. What is the number of people that you're going to need to sort of service 80% of the transplant world in the U.S.?

Waleed Hassanein

executive
#25

On all three organs?

David Lewis

analyst
#26

Yes.

Waleed Hassanein

executive
#27

I believe the numbers are not going to be exponentially different. I think it's tough to predict, but I'm guessing somewhere between 50% to 60%, and I'm being very generous. Again, once we get to efficiency, I mean, one person can run two organs at the same time. But we don't want to think that way yet. We just want to build the infrastructure, build the demand, build the volume, and then we will staff it as needed.

David Lewis

analyst
#28

Okay. Just finishing up on lung, moving over to heart is the lung 5-year data should be coming up here, I think, in the second half of the year, timing on sort of seeing the 5-year lung data, and how important do you think that's going to be in terms of driving adoption?

Waleed Hassanein

executive
#29

Sure. Well, the COVID pandemic actually delayed that because we could not -- most of the hospitals, not just in the U.S. but around the world, they shut down their research departments. So we couldn't have research coordinators actually collecting the data. So that's been pushed to Q1. So I think we are hoping to have that data available for the next isotope in April 2021. How important that data? I think that data, as we always talked about it, David, I think it will be helpful, but I don't think it's going to be like a major catalyst. Because at the end of the day, we have major catalysts in the lung. It's the logistics. It's the infrastructure. It's the people needed. It's the people who are trained. So the service model is going to serve that. But definitely having good data and have a good 5-year outcome is important. But I don't think that is the -- that is as critical as setting up these logistics infrastructure and national service program in the U.S. That's the one that's going to catapult the lung adoption, and frankly, will help every other organ as well.

David Lewis

analyst
#30

Okay. Very helpful. So the next most important catalyst coming up here is the heart panel, which we now have a date, virtual date in October. The -- I guess the question would be, there were -- in some of the data, there was a separation, you and I have talked about this, between the OCS arm and control arm, specifically on things like mortality. And I think to some investors, that may seem alarming but then again, transplantation, this data is kind of is first-of-its-kind, and the cohorts are fundamentally different. So help us understand some the key data events in that data set that's been submitted. Do you think they're going to be debatable at the panel and maybe help flesh that out for people here?

Waleed Hassanein

executive
#31

Sure. That's a very important question, David, and thank you for asking. So let me start by saying panel events are always associated with either first-of-its-kind PMA or some divergence of opinion between FDA and the sponsor. And in this particular case for the heart, we have both. It's a first-of-its-kind PMA and there are divergence of opinion. The divergence of opinion is primarily focused on the long-term survival difference that we saw in the decade-old trial and how does that relate to a completely different indication, completely different trial, completely different device, completely different use model that we've done in EXPAND. That being said, this is the FDA, and this is -- we are going to address both trials at this panel. We feel confident in our ability to address every question or every clinical concern raised by FDA. We understand why would they raise this and we're prepared to address every single question in the FDA briefing material and also demonstrate to the panelists and the FDA that why our position is the position that would hopefully be supported by the panelists. And we're looking forward to this panel date. It is an important milestone. And we submitted our material. The FDA is looking at it right now. And we're in active discussion with them, leading into the panel, making sure that they've seen our position. They have our panel-briefing material. And we're anxiously waiting to that panel date to be able to address these questions. But I believe that's going to be the crux of the discussion. There are other things that the FDA might raise, and I think we understand where they're coming from. However, there's like a little bit of misunderstanding of what the data sets mean, what the patient characteristics are. And our goal is to clarify that to the panelist. And we believe that we are very well equipped to be able to do that. We've done two mock panels, and we feel very confident in our position. Now we need to go and execute it and hopefully put that panel behind us. And hopefully, have positive outcome.

David Lewis

analyst
#32

Yes. It's not the first time you've dealt with sort of a first-of-its-kind interpretation of lung transplantation. You did the same thing of lung. In the case of lung, there was a definition of disagreement or definitional dynamic around 30-day, 30-day data. I think in that case, well, it really was the strength of the long-term data in lung that got the agency comfortable that this thing is working. In the situation of heart, we have 12-month EXPAND data. I don't know what the trend lines there show. Is it going to be the 12-month EXPAND where it gets uncomfortable? Or was it really going to be a cohort analysis of the two independent arms to prove to them that these are just different patient populations?

Waleed Hassanein

executive
#33

I think, David, I don't like to comment specifically on active discussion with FDA. But I think -- remember, I'm going to only address it in one angle. Remember, we've done 75 cases in EXPAND. We've added another 40 or 41 cases in EXPAND CAP. That's a total of 121, 122 cases compared to 62 cases in the PROCEED II trial that was done a decade ago. So we -- I think our focus is going to be on EXPAND. And our focus is to address why EXPAND is the indication -- is the one map to the indication that we're seeking. However, we are going to make ourselves ready, and we will address PROCEED head on to make sure that there's no misinterpretation of what the PROCEED data means and how is it interpretable according to our proposed indication. And that's why I say we're going to touch on PROCEED whether we like it or not, and I'll just keep it at that.

David Lewis

analyst
#34

Okay. Perfect. Let's move on to something else that sort of I think was lost in the land of COVID which is the liver data, which I've been looking at your data sets for 15 years. And I would say that liver data, on the surface, and we've talked in multiple payloads about it. It maybe your strongest data set or strongest organ based data set we've seen. Maybe just quickly kind of recapping for people who probably missed the liver data that came out in the heat of COVID, what that data showed and why you think it was so intriguing?

Waleed Hassanein

executive
#35

Sure. We're very, very excited about the liver data. The liver data, we believe, is not only the best data set for TransMedics, but also, we believe it's the best data set for any ex vivo perfusion platform in the industry. And our position is not just based on the fact that we're the ones who sponsored this trial, but it's really based on the data and the science and the clinical end points that we achieved statistical superiority on. What the liver data shows, in a very simple terms, that in the two most critical clinical outcome points or end points, OCS have demonstrated superior outcome both on short term early allograft dysfunction, which is the equivalent of PGD in heart and lung, not but for liver and also in an intermediate or long-term complication that is really the Achilles' heel of long-term survival of liver transplant, which is called biliary complications that are ischemic in nature or ischemic collagenopathies. And in both these two cases, we've demonstrated superior outcome to control group. The second reason why we believe this is very strong data, is this was not a small study, David. This was a 300-plus patient study in a randomized fashion, all U.S.-based. There's no international component to it. So this is -- again, as you've stated, this is the strongest data set, not just for us, but it's the strongest data set in the entire field. And we're -- the PMA is under review. In fact, we're being audited by FDA as we speak, and things are moving in the right direction, and we're meeting with FDA in October to kind of map out what the next steps are in the review process.

David Lewis

analyst
#36

Okay. Can you just update us on timing -- liver approval timing as you see it?

Waleed Hassanein

executive
#37

Right now, we still forecasting 2021 approval, hopefully, first half, but we'll have better granular information on this once we meet with FDA to better understand is this going to panel, when would the panel be and can I map out the time line from there. But for us, I think the data is strong. The review process has been going in a fairly streamlined fashion. And we're cautiously optimistic that things are going to be a little bit more of a smooth sailing in this one because things are moving in the right direction.

David Lewis

analyst
#38

Okay. DCD Heart, how has that been -- how has enrollment there been impacted by COVID? And kind of can you just update us on time lines?

Waleed Hassanein

executive
#39

As I said in the last call, the most resilient part of our business was DCD Heart and during the COVID crisis specifically. And the reason for that is the -- at the time, two out of the four drivers of the DCD Heart enrollment programs at the time in Q2 were not hit by COVID peaks, which is Duke and University of Wisconsin. Nash General was hit and has kind of slowed down. And since then, in Q3, we've seen significant expansion of the DCD trial. We're now having 25 centers actively involved. Compared to Q2, I think we had nine -- or eight or nine. And our enrollment, as we said in Q2, we expect this trial to finish enrollment end of Q3, beginning of Q4. And I think we're on that same trajectory.

David Lewis

analyst
#40

And just to wrap out, Waleed, your confidence in sort of the state of the balance sheet as you're here and obviously, there is a lot going on. You've got multiple trials, commercial expansion. Your confidence that the balance sheet that you currently sits is enough to sort of get this company to profitability or not convinced yet?

Waleed Hassanein

executive
#41

We're fairly confident. Stephen, I'm sorry, go ahead.

Stephen Gordon

executive
#42

Yes. No, I was going to say our position is what it was after the last raise and it continues to be.

David Lewis

analyst
#43

And then the last point, Waleed, would just be your fourth organ, on kidney. Just update the time line there. I think there was a thought that we'd initiate a trial in 2021. Is that still -- I mean, you've got a lot going on.

Waleed Hassanein

executive
#44

Yes, I know. There's a lot going on, and we want to finish what we have and kind of drive it through the go line. So right now, we're hoping that we will be in a position to start the clinical program end of 2021. But the program is still on our map. Worst-case scenario, it may be pushed to Q1 2022, but we're hoping to get something on by the end of 2021.

David Lewis

analyst
#45

Yes. I'm not sure it would be the worst thing if that program slipped into '22 just given the lockdown.

Waleed Hassanein

executive
#46

Exactly. Because for me, ending 2021 with three approved organ indication and a national service model that is firing on all cylinders, I think this will be a huge, huge, huge catalyst to grow our business and our revenue.

David Lewis

analyst
#47

Okay. Well, look, we're out of time. With that, Waleed, Stephen, thanks so much for being here at this conference. Enjoy your meetings today, and we'll be in touch soon.

Waleed Hassanein

executive
#48

Thank you very much, David. Have a great rest of the day.

Stephen Gordon

executive
#49

Thank you.

Waleed Hassanein

executive
#50

Thank you.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete TransMedics Group, Inc. transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to TransMedics Group, Inc. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.