Unilever PLC (ULVR) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 8, 2020

London Stock Exchange GB Consumer Staples Personal Care Products conference_presentation 28 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Warren Ackerman

analyst
#1

Hello, everybody. My name is Warren Ackerman, Head of the European Consumer Staples Team at Barclays. Welcome to the Global Consumer Conference. I'm delighted to have Alan Jope, Unilever's CEO, with us for the session today. The format is going to be a fireside chat. We have about 30 minutes. So Alan, thank you for joining.

Alan Jope

executive
#2

Thank you, Warren. It's a pleasure to be here.

Warren Ackerman

analyst
#3

A lot to ask you in a short period of time. But why don't we crack on and just as an opening question, I'd love to kind of hear your perspective 2 years -- almost 2 years in as CEO, lots of highs and lows interspersed with COVID. Could you maybe just share with us your learnings in that period? And any regrets that you've had as CEO? What's been the high points? What's been the low points?

Alan Jope

executive
#4

Yes. Thanks, Warren. Well, it certainly has been a busy 20 months. Last year, more or less in the first quarter, we put a completely new leadership team in place, 3 people from the outside, promoted 3 internally, rotated 3 and 4 state and continuity roles. Second quarter, we worked on our new expression of our company strategy. Third quarter, we really started to dig into our operational capability, where we're executing to our full potential. And in the fourth quarter, we really embarked on a bit of a deeper portfolio review. Since then, of course, we've now got this very challenging crisis mode that we're in, where we've got a health crisis, a social crisis, people living and consuming differently. We think we're on the brink of a bit of an economic crisis, racial justice crisis, climate crisis. We've been a bit in crisis management mode for the last 6 months. And I think what we found is Unilever is quite resilient. We've attacked new levels of agility that I don't think we knew the business was capable of. And we're trying to keep going with the strategic changes, things like pushing through unification, making a move on tea and some big sustainability commitments that we might get into. You asked me this devious question about regret. Probably the thing I would say there is that I think we could have moved about 1/4 faster on really digging into our operational capability, the intensity or execution. And having identified these rather simple 5 growth fundamentals, I think they have been an unlock for us, and I wish we'd go on to that maybe a quarter or so faster.

Warren Ackerman

analyst
#5

Okay. And just maybe moving to competitiveness. It's been a theme in the last few quarters. It does seem like your competitiveness is improving, execution has stepped up somewhat. Can you maybe talk to us a little bit about what's driving that? You've got a new COO, Nitin, looking at cell methodology, is that being part of the driver? Or has it been more holistic across the board?

Alan Jope

executive
#6

Well, let me just start by saying that it is an absolute priority for the company to close any gap between the potential growth of our portfolio and the realized growth. And you're right, the foundations for better execution were laid last year when we recreated the Chief Operating Officer position that Nitin sits in. We introduced a flatter organization. It goes straight from Nitin to 15 big markets. And that's really become our mechanism for managing performance and landing our global initiatives. Our 5 growth fundamentals have really brought focus in our markets organization and what moves the needle to get better growth. And what we've seen through COVID is the speed that we've needed has actually come from this simpler markets organization. We've gone from Unilever's executive meeting on a monthly basis to meeting on a daily basis. And I think the elapsed time between deciding we want to do something and it starting to happen in the market is now hours, not weeks. And our GMs are highly empowered to make decisions on the ground. And it is showing up, you're right. We can see penetration levels of our brands stepping up and a sequential improvement before and during coronavirus in our volume-led market share. And now what we're preoccupied with is how do we lock in this newfound speed and agility in a kind of new normal.

Warren Ackerman

analyst
#7

Okay. And you touched on COVID. I mean clearly, demand patterns have been turned upside down. Just interesting to hear your take on which of those do you think is transitory, which is permanent. What's sort of enduring for Unilever through this?

Alan Jope

executive
#8

Well, look, we're well beyond any of those very short-term things like pantry stocking. And so we think there are things that are going medium duration and things that will be more or less permanent. So the medium duration things would be the extraordinary growth we're seeing in hygiene categories. So hand hygiene, surface hygiene, that will run for a while, but it won't -- we won't see the types of growth that we're seeing there indefinitely. But the other big one is in-home food consumption. I think we were a little slow to realize just how important a shift that was going to be on the downside from out-of-home meeting in our restaurant business, supply business, Food Solutions and on the upside in our in-home foods business. Then the more permanent effects that we're anticipating are e-everything. So how we browse, how we buy, how we pay the media we consume we think that's a onetime change, it's a ratchet-up, similarly for e-commerce. We saw this in China back in 2010 when they had pandemics out there, the step-up in e-commerce state. The second area that I think is semipermanent, is the preoccupation with health and well-being. So anything to do with immunity, health, well-being, we're seeing a big surge in our small-but-beautiful vitamins business, in Horlicks, where we've actually moved quickly to introduce some new products around immunity. And even those kind of health and well-being bits of our Prestige beauty portfolio, we're really seeing a step-up there. And the third area that we think is going to be semipermanent is conscious consumption. We are seeing that sustainability issues are mattering to consumers even more than before coronavirus. I think they feel, particularly young people, that it's time for business and brands to show more responsibility on the social and environmental footprint. If you're interested, I can go into some research, go on around that. But that's the third. And then, of course, what we don't really know is how permanent the recession-driven behavior is going to be.

Warren Ackerman

analyst
#9

I mean on that point, on recession, I mean, we can't get away from how deep the recession is. How well-positioned, would you say, Unilever is? How much down-trading are you seeing? What steps are you taking to ensure the resilience of the portfolio in that downturn?

Alan Jope

executive
#10

So I think a global -- we believe a global economic downturn is absolutely inevitable. But we don't know the depth. We don't know how it will play out by country. And -- but we do know some things from the past, which is that in recessions, consumers are looking for value, and that does not just mean the lowest possible price. So we see typically a tilt back to big brands because of the trust that they bring. We see value channels. That would be the discounter channels in Europe or the dollar stores in North America or cash and carries in Latin America typically do well. And of course, you have value brands and value pack sizes benefit from smart shopping. Interestingly, the role of price value and affordability changes country to country. So in South Africa, for example, where group buying is a common behavior, big pack sizes take off in recessions, in other markets, small pack sizes. We don't compete by slashing prices. Our value portfolio, call it products at below about an 80 price index, makes up 20% of our business, given that many branded players don't play at all in the value tier, it's quite a good start. And right now, we have good squads working on where we got gaps in our portfolio market by market, brand by brand, pack size by pack size. And in general, our value portfolio has a different P&L profile. So what we would expect to see is some gross margin erosion potentially, but not an erosion of operating margin because these brands typically demand less in terms of marketing support.

Warren Ackerman

analyst
#11

Okay. And just shifting gear, Alan, to channel and e-commerce. I mean clearly, e-commerce is booming. I saw that e-commerce in your U.S. business has almost doubled H1 on H1, and you're doing very well in terms of market share. Can you just talk a bit about the resources you're putting into e-commerce? Can you do it in a margin-accretive fashion? Where are we in terms of the journey and the investment in e-comm?

Alan Jope

executive
#12

Yes, this is the right area to spend some time on. First thing I should say is we have a bit of a mixed picture on our online shares versus our off-line shares. It's by far not homogenous that we always have a higher online share than off-line shares. So there's no complacency there. E-commerce represents 8% of our portfolio in the first half. That's really a function of the categories, brands and geographies that we're in. It's growing very, very quickly. I could easily see a day when e-commerce represents 30% of Unilever's business. From a margin perspective, it's accretive, broadly driven by the mix impacts. So we're not worried about the growth of e-commerce. It's important to really start moving away from one grouping because pure-play dynamics are very different from omnichannel dynamics, very different from direct-to-consumer. And maybe the most strategically important part of this for us might be business-to-business, e-commerce, which is already very significant in scale and growing very quickly.

Warren Ackerman

analyst
#13

Okay. And maybe just turning to the U.S. because that was another feature of the results. You've struggled in the U.S. over recent years to get the growth that you want, but you grew 9% in the second quarter, if I remember rightly. You got new leadership in the U.S., Fabian Garcia has taken over from Amanda Sourry. Just interested in that growth. How sustainable is it? What has the new leadership team brought to the party for your business there?

Alan Jope

executive
#14

Well, without saying too much, we are seeing sustained strength in North America and the U.S., particularly. Of course, there was some crazy stocking up in March. But since then, consumption patterns do seem to settle the higher levels of demand. It's especially driven by hygiene products and in-home food. We saw a very strong growth in Foods & Refreshment. I think it was up 23% in quarter 2, when you strip out our out-of-home food business. We're getting a little bit of top spend from the stepped-up competitiveness in things like hair care and dressings. E-commerce has been a big driver. We think we're -- we've got about 2/3 of our business is winning share online in the U.S. And yes, Fabian has been a big addition. Frankly, I think we've attracted a great leader for the role. In many ways, he's a bit overqualified for the job. He has served as the CEO before. He was very explicit about being attracted by Unilever's purpose and our values. Fabian is bringing a high level of operational intensities, particularly strong on making prioritization calls. And he has led brilliantly through the social volatility that we're seeing in the U.S. So I think a really great add to the team there.

Warren Ackerman

analyst
#15

And just in terms of emerging markets, Alan, I mean, 60% of sales would asunder -- you've got 4 big ones that really matter, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia. Everybody is worried about the macro top-down in EM. But can you talk about your resilience kind of bottom-up in terms of the affordability of the channels that you're looking at, the B2B channel. I'd love to hear how you've dealt with crises in the past and what learnings you can bring this time around.

Alan Jope

executive
#16

Well, the way you asked the correct question is the correct one because emerging markets is not a helpful aggregation anymore. We never use it in the company other than at results time. We need to -- we do need to decompose a bit. We don't have time for an entire world tour, but let me hit the highlights. First thing to remember is the 85% of our business in emerging markets comes from positions where we've got either the #1 or #2 brand. Let's start with China. China has been quite an important leading indicator for other markets to learn from, channel shifts, how you go back to an office. And we saw growth in China bounce back very quickly. It was 6% in Q2. We are a Chinese company in China. 97% of our managers are Chinese. We've been the top FMCG employer of choice in China for the last 3 years. We have very strong partnerships with Ali and JD, and we've got an unusual distribution model where we've now figured out how to get into the lower-tier cities, we call it [ DTX ] and there's faster growth coming from those smaller cities, and so we're quite happy about that. I won't say too much about India. Everyone knows our position there. Other than to say that the market is definitely down, but 85% of our business there is winning market share. And so the speed and agility of Hindustan Unilever means that when things bounce back, we do expect to do well. The Horlicks acquisition is going exceptionally well. But the disease progression's a worry. It's the only major country where we're still seeing exponential growth in cases. At the moment, the 7-day rolling average is about 70,000 new cases being diagnosed a day. Although the case is per million, it's still half the U.S. So we're a little bit in the watch-and-see mode in India. I think Southeast Asia will bounce back quickly. We're seeing Indonesia coming back. We know very well how to manage through crises in Southeast Asia. Perhaps the exception is Thailand, which seems to be hit very hard by the tourism slump. Now Brazil is the most interesting one, I think, again, a position where we have very strong positions. I think -- if I'm honest, I'm a little surprised that the business there continues to grow. We've landed pricing in that market very well. We've built, I think -- one of the features is we built up a strong B2B e-commerce business. If anything, you get the gist of it immediately if you just go google Compra Agora, and if there's one market that knows how to manage a crisis, it's our Brazilian team. But I -- we do think that, economically, LATAM is in a bit of trouble and will take longer to recover.

Warren Ackerman

analyst
#17

Just shifting gear again to margins. You've obviously kind of stepped back a bit from the 20% target. You've always said margin is an output, not an input, and that's how you get that. But looking at the model going forward, do you expect to still be able to sustain the EUR 2 billion of annual savings that you've enjoyed over recent years? And I don't want to try and pin you down on a specific number, but -- I mean even if it is like 19%, is it going to be like a flat margin from here? Or can we expect to see some modest improvement? Or is it all about getting that top line to pick up on a flattish margin?

Alan Jope

executive
#18

Look, I think the answer is yes, yes and yes. Yes, we continue to deliver the savings. Yes, the absolute priority is top line. And yes, we can expect some sort of margin evolution. Let me just explain why a little bit. So our absolute focus is competitive, volume-led growth. We know that brands that gain volume share during recessions typically grow 1.4x faster than the rest of the market for the next 5 years. That's why we're so obsessed with penetration, and we're seeing the improvement. If we decompose our business into its relevant segments and compare the profitability of Beauty & Personal Care with this relevant set, Home Care with this relevant set and Foods & Refreshment with this relevant set, what you see is that Foods & Refreshment and Beauty & Personal Care kind of middle of the pack, Home Care, although it's improved a lot, it's still actually towards the bottom of the pack. And so looking at our aggregate margin, and also when you decompose it, we do see some headroom for continued margin evolution. But for the 500th time, it will never be at the expense of competitive growth. And maybe tipping our -- lifting the carpet a little bit, I don't think it will be at the same rate that we've seen in the last 4 years.

Warren Ackerman

analyst
#19

Okay. Just maybe turning to M&A, Alan, you've done a lot of small deals since 2015, I think 30 plus, maybe 35. Have you got enough out of those deals since you've done them? And maybe can I put you on the spot and ask you which are the 2 best ones that you've done and maybe 2 that have done perhaps less well than what you thought?

Alan Jope

executive
#20

Yes. So if we compare -- so First Trust says we're responsible managers of capital, so we always have a good business case. And if we look at the performance of our acquisitions over the last few years, we do see a normal distribution around the business case. A couple that have done very well is our Prestige business. We have made very good progress on putting together this very carefully selected set of brands. I think we have now got the best-performing luxury beauty business in the market at the moment, and we're emboldened to go further on that. Also brands that we just fully smashed into Unilever, like Quala in Latin America, do very well. And as I already said, Horlicks will do well. Let me be candid on the other side of the spectrum. I think we've struggled more when we've moved beyond our core expertise. So Blueair has been difficult, compounded by improvements that the Chinese government made to air quality in our core cities there. And Dollar Shave Club is also off the acquisition business case. Though that was also part of learning about direct-to-consumer business models, and we sure have learned a lot there. And have some very promising projects that we are working on and some others that we've stopped as a direct consequence of our Dollar Shave Club learnings. There you go, just like a straightforward answer.

Warren Ackerman

analyst
#21

Yes, it was. Because moving to the Sustainable Living Plan, I think 2020 is 10 years since that plan was put into practice. I mean -- I think it's fair to say, from my point, that you were ahead of your time or certainly, Paul was when he pulled it in. How do you maintain that leadership, especially in a kind of post-COVID world where aspirations and views are rapidly changing?

Alan Jope

executive
#22

I'm glad we're touching on this one because I think there's 2 things that differentiate Unilever and you have to decide whether you like it or not. One is our EMs exposure and the second is our deep commitment and know-how on sustainable business. Our vision is to continue to be the global leader in sustainable business. We believe that will serve all stakeholders well, not least of which is because of the growing challenges that the world faces, social crisis and environmental crisis, they're becoming more pressing. It's a 100-year tradition in the company, and Paul did a brilliant job codifying it as the USLP 10 years ago. As you know, we've integrated our business strategy and our sustainability strategy in this thing we call our Compass. We'll share more about that towards the end of this year, beginning on next year. One goal of that is to make sure that sustainability shows up more in our brands. We do believe strongly that brands with purpose grow faster. We know that purpose can be a real point of differentiation for brands, but it has to come on top of superior product quality, getting the pricing right, et cetera. And we think we've got a unique viewpoint and know-how on the blend of what your brands see and what they actually do. And then lastly, I'd just say, we made some very recent announcements and big climate and nature commitment in June. And just this week, an announcement that we were going to, by 2030, replace all the carbon that comes from fossil fuels in our Home Care portfolio, with carbon sourced from other more renewable places. So according to GlobeScan, we are by far the global market leader in responsible business. We think it gives us increasing competitive advantage over time, and you can watch our actions. We're very busy in that space.

Warren Ackerman

analyst
#23

Okay. And to turn it, I've got to ask you about unification. We've got 2 important votes coming up. It's a seminal moment in Unilever's history, something you've tried for a few times. Can I just ask you and get your take on this Dutch Green Party proposal that you yourself have said could scupper unification and result in a big tax bill. Could you elaborate maybe on your options in the event of some kind of parliamentary delay? Is it binary? Or how are you thinking about it internally?

Alan Jope

executive
#24

Yes. Well, I should say that the Board is absolutely committed to seeing through this unification proposal. Everybody agrees it's in the best interest of Unilever. And we're expecting strong shareholder support. Of course, we're monitoring the situation as private members' bill is still in its infancy. And we're not clear whether we'll even make it to Parliament, there's lots of unknowns. We believe our legal advice is that this bill would be in breach of EU law or and definitely in breach of the current U.K.-Dutch tax treaty. We'll keep shareholders appraised. But I think we stand by our position, which is we're not going to speculate on all the many paths this could take but if there's a high probability that exit would be associated with an EUR 11 billion tax bill, obviously, that wouldn't be in shareholders' interests. But personally, I think logic and common sense will prevail.

Warren Ackerman

analyst
#25

And assuming the shareholder vote goes well for you, just looking forward, Alan, what happens next? I mean it seems like maybe internally, there's a bit of a debate about scale versus focus. Correct me if I'm wrong, there's been a lot of talk out there around bolder acquisitions. I think you yourself have said at the Q2 stage, there's maybe nothing imminent in the short term on the radar, but there could be in the medium term. And then demerger, I guess you're always looking at valuation relative to your international peers. How do you kind of weigh up the options available to you in the event that unification does happen?

Alan Jope

executive
#26

I think the first thing I want to say is that 99.99% of the person hours in Unilever go on maximizing the potential of the portfolio that we have today. And that is actually a pathway to increasing the valuation of the company, much easier and more value-creating than sort of enormous churning of the portfolio. Nevertheless, we do want to unify the company to put ourselves on an equal footing when it comes to portfolio evolution. We've said we want to accelerate the pace of moving into higher-growth categories and moving out of lower-growth categories. And tea is a good example of that, frankly. The strategic review of tea has identified that a demerger or an IPO was an attractive, possible option. And one of those is not available on our current legal structure, at least not practically available. The day when I stop saying we don't see anything imminent on a transformational acquisition, I think, is when you should start listening carefully. But all I can say for now is that we're not preoccupied -- actually, maybe I'll put it this way, which is I don't feel pressure to move too quickly on transformational deals because I think there's still a lot of trapped potential in the lovely business that we've got today.

Warren Ackerman

analyst
#27

And Alan, time's almost beaten us, but I have one more for you, and it's kind of a follow-up on portfolio. And having been a Unilever watcher for some time, I do look at the portfolio quite carefully. And there's a number of areas where it looks to me you could do more. One would be U.S. Home Care, where you were out of the market and then you've come back in with Seventh Generation and The Laundress, and they've done really exceptionally well for you. The second is China cosmetics where you yourself said you've been lobbying for a decade to get the rules changed around animal testing. And what does that mean now? There's a more of a level playing field. And the third area is around OLLY Nutrition. I mean -- I think I'm right in saying that's your first step into wellness or -- not wellness, but to consumer health. Could you talk a little bit about your vision around each of those 3 opportunities, in brief, what the attractiveness is, how quickly can you scale up those opportunities?

Alan Jope

executive
#28

So those are astute observations. We end up in a similar place, but through slightly different lenses. We've been very clear on where we want to step it up. The first is skin care, including, but not limited to Asian skin care. The second is to take our luxury beauty business, the Prestige division to something that has scale, that matters to Unilever. China is specifically an opportunity, where we've worked with the authorities there for years now to demonstrate that you don't need to do animal testing to prove the safety and efficacy of the products. They've finally listened. And then the third is health and well-being, where -- it's kind of where Prestige was 4 years ago. It's a twinkle in our eye. We acquired OLLY. It's going very well. We've just announced another acquisition actually. And in fact, I should have maybe mentioned that wellness is a space where we're ahead of business case. So if you take skin care, luxury beauty and health and well-being, you'd be, for sure, watching places where we'll be investing for growth. On U.S. Home Care, we can get extremely rapid growth there from, particularly, Seventh Generation, which we will also roll out to other markets. But I think we'll be cautious about entering some mass market, head-to-head battle in Home Care in the U.S.

Warren Ackerman

analyst
#29

Listen, with that, Alan, I think we're going to have to cut it there. It's been a great conversation. Thank you for taking your time to present to us. And I hope to see you in person, in Boston, in 2021. Thanks again for your time.

Alan Jope

executive
#30

You bet. Thanks, Warren. It's been a pleasure. See you soon.

Warren Ackerman

analyst
#31

Take care. Bye-bye.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Unilever PLC transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Unilever PLC earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.