United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
November 12, 2026
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Gary C. Evans
executiveThanks, and good afternoon, everyone — welcome to all of you listening today. I'd like to begin by introducing the members of our management team who are joining me on today's call. We have five additional presenters, as follows: Joe Bardswich, a board member and Executive Vice President, and also our Chief Mining Engineer. Shawn Winkler, our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, who has worked with the company since December but became a permanent fixture at the end of September of this year. Will Werner, Managing Director and also our Director of Engineering, who has been with us since the end of February of this year. Aaron Tenesch is our Vice President and Chief Procurement Officer in the Antimony Division. Aaron runs our Radersburg flotation facility up in Montana, along with our new laboratory, which is also located in that same facility, where various minerals are reviewed. Last is Jonathan Miller, our Vice President of Investor Relations. Before I hand the call over to Shawn Winkler to discuss the financials in greater detail, I want to highlight a few of our third quarter accomplishments, of which there are many. Revenues for the third quarter rose 16%. Antimony pounds sold were up 68% this quarter. Our gross profit margin expanded to 42% from 23% in a declining market, which I think says a lot. Gross profit was up 113% to $4.3 million. Shawn, sorry to steal some of your thunder, but I'll let you get into the financials.
Shawn Winkler
executiveThank you, Gary. As Gary said, he covered a few of the key points. As I walk through the specifics, keep in mind that several of the figures I mention are rounded. Full detail is available in our earnings press release and our 10-Q, which came out a few minutes ago. Gary noted revenue of $10.1 million. That represented 16% growth. Importantly, it was 28% higher than Q2, and we will explain what drove that. Gross profit increased more than twofold, reaching $4.3 million, and gross margin, as Gary said, improved quite nicely versus the quarter. We sold roughly 469,000 lbs of antimony. That marks a 68% rise year-over-year. Approximately 162,000 lbs of that went to the DLA, and the sales price for it came to about $5.1 million in aggregate. The remaining antimony sales, around 307,000 lbs, went mainly to industrial customers and brought in roughly $3.7 million in revenue. Our cost per pound sold dropped to $10.19 from $20.89, largely a reflection of broader antimony pricing in the market. Worth noting, our DLA revenue climbed 55% year-on-year to approximately $1.04 million for the quarter. Operating expenses came in at $10.3 million. That is an increase, though some of it is additive over time, as $3.4 million of that went toward exploration at some of our attractive mining claims. Out of the $3.8 million, part was additionally a $3.8 million non-cash loss on our Larvotto strategic investment. Net loss came to $9.5 million, or $0.06 per share. Turning to operations, our industrial business performed well. ATO pounds sold increased 10% year-on-year. Our net margins have remained steady alongside a decline in both sales price and feedstock. Over nine months, we have put $28.4 million into capital projects, mainly the Thompson Falls expansion in Radersburg, partly offset by $12.8 million of Department of War grant proceeds that we have realized. Of our total grants awarded to date, $27.0 million, $20.3 million have been authorized, and of that we have realized the $12.8 million I just referenced. On the balance sheet, we finished September with $51 million in cash and treasuries. Larvotto shares are worth $39.4 million as well. Nothing has been drawn against a $19 million margin line. Inventory grew to $28.1 million as we staged material for DLA. Through October, we repurchased about $3.1 million of stock, with $98.3 million still authorized. On the DLA, we also delivered seven DLA shipments, so roughly 276,000 lbs, and those have been accepted and paid for, totaling about $8.7 million in revenue. We still have about $48.6 million of sales to the DLA contracted through 2029; we have made significant progress in the cycle time, from sampling through delivery to the DLA. On our recent shipments we have gotten that down to about 70 days. I will note that with DLA, we are depending upon DLA approvals at various steps. In the end, when it comes to timing and cycle time, those aren't things we control, even though both sides are collaborating really well to smooth that out. As things stand, we've got additional lots, 8 to 11, roughly 122,000 lbs, that were sampled in early October, and the delivery timing along with acceptance by the DLA is TBD; lots 12 through 14 come after those. One point on guidance, as our press release says, we're shifting methodologies. Before, our guidance was $60 million-$75 million of revenue; that now needs to move to volume. Clearly, revenue gets affected by how fast we deliver, and also by overall market prices, which are outside our control. So, we're starting guidance for the full year of 2026. We expect to sell 1.68 million to 1.81 million pounds of antimony; at the midpoint, that's up 24% year-on-year. That figure includes 276,000 to 356,000 lbs to the DLA in total, and on the low end, that doesn't include any further deliveries to the DLA this year. At the high end, we do have two more trucks to be accepted. Guidance also includes a sale of 17,500 to 18,500 tons of zeolite. Worth noting, any DLA volumes not delivered this year shift to the right into 2027. They aren't lost. Gary, with that, I'll hand it back to you.
Gary C. Evans
executiveThanks, Shawn — we’re really glad to have you with us. You’ve been a strong addition to our finance and accounting group. Joe Bardswich, who serves as manager of our — he leads our chief mining engineers and oversees nearly all of our key mineral projects. Joe, could you bring us up to date on what you’ve been working on?
Joe Bardswich
executiveThank you, Gary. I'll start with the Fostung Tungsten deposit, located close to Espanola, Ontario, in south central Canada. In August, we were honored to hold an on-site traditional blessing ceremony, led by elders from the Whitefish River First Nation — the community nearest to the deposit site. As we've pledged to them repeatedly, we remain dedicated to collaborating closely with every First Nation on whose traditional territories we operate as we move ahead. Our hope is that by deploying new technology and leveraging our technical and financial strengths, we can generate value from this tungsten deposit, which has lain dormant since it was discovered 45 years ago, in 1981. During September, a contractor from a First Nations community was engaged by us, and at the deposit's eastern end they managed to remove the overburden soil until bedrock was exposed. On that section of the deposit, we put in 32 confirmation holes for a total of 2,100 ft. The drill cuttings have been shipped to our lab in Radersburg, Montana, for analysis, and results are arriving. After the remaining assay results come in, we expect to be in a position to design a drill and blast program that will generate feed for an on-site program of crushing, screening, and gravity concentration. That concentrate could then be hauled by truck to a local flotation plant for additional upgrading and/or sold to an ammonium paratungstate plant located in Michigan or Ohio. Earlier, we had the Toronto branch of SRK Consulting—an independent geological consulting company—put together a technical report that satisfies the SEC's S-K 1300 rules. Their estimate showed an inferred mineral resource of 14.77 million metric tons at 0.17% WO3, which works out to 54.17 million pounds of tungsten and a future gross value of $4.6 billion, using recent worldwide tungsten prices. In Ontario as well, we carried out soil sampling at our gold-silver prospect in the Dubreuilville area, following up on the extremely strong results from a lake sediment sampling program run by the Ontario government. We expect results from this work by year-end. Turning to Montana: this spring our Stibnite Hill mining project was delayed while the Montana DEQ went through our permits, standard operating practices and so on. Once we made certain modifications they had asked for, operations could restart in early July. On this mountain, Stibnite Hill, the prominent stibnite vein was historically worked by underground methods, but those were shut down in 1983, when the decision was made to move operations to Mexico. The veins at Stibnite Hill run roughly two feet in thickness, lie flat and dip at 25 degrees, which makes underground mining difficult. So instead of attempting to return underground, mining using modern surface methods began in mid-October of last year. Better excavation equipment designs now allow us to reach those narrow veins right from the surface. During October and early November of last year, we trucked 50 loads of ore — roughly 800 wet tons — to the Radersburg mill. That material ran about 10% Sb. Mining restarted in July of this year, and we've hauled close to 2,000 tons to the Radersburg mill since then. When the upgrades currently underway at that mill are complete, we anticipate being able to produce material that meets mil-spec for the primer used in ammunition. I'll have Aaron Tenesch, our metallurgical expert, walk you through the details of that process. One thing worth noting: the Radersburg mill uses modern flotation technology, and our metallurgical team will operate it in a way that is both efficient and economical. Turning to Alaska: in the Ester Dome area close to Fox, Alaska, we planned a program quite similar to the one we executed in Montana. The soil overburden proved deeper than anticipated, and only late in this season were antimony, gold, and silver finally encountered in bedrock. A pleasant surprise came from some silver values that were especially high. At present, sample preparation for shipment to our Montana laboratory is proceeding at full pace, and the drilling program at our Ester Dome sites is ongoing. This site has thick overburden, and in the past there was underground mining of placer gold, silver, and antimony there. The KM property, located in the Maclaren River area — we picked it up by staking it two years ago, after an exploration program run by the state of Alaska revealed very high copper values in outcrop, with averages of 16.5% copper, 2.2 oz of silver, and 0.08 oz of gold per ton. A drill crew was brought to the site, but an early winter forced us to shut down after completing just one core hole. Low copper values were hit near the bottom of that hole. The core will be evaluated and assayed over the winter lull. About the Stibnite Creek property—that was staked and acquired two years back as well. A significant amount went into remediating earlier work that others had done, which involved an on-site mill; that cleanup was required before we could secure permits, including access permits. This year we decided to scale back activity there until we can work out a better deal with the regulators regarding what we owe for cleaning up a disturbance caused by a third party. Nolan Creek ranks among our key properties, so I'll pass it to William Werner for an update on Nolan.
Will Werner
executiveAlright, this is Will Werner. Ever since we acquired the previously abandoned Nolan Creek mining claims back in January of this year, the company has been assessing that 500-acre prospect for antimony as well as gold. The underground exploration workings that the prior operator drove on Workman's Bench back in 2007 have been pinpointed as holding the strongest potential for near-term mining operations. At present we hold a permit allowing a 1,000-ton bulk sample to be taken from those underground workings; that material is going to be hauled to our facility in Radersburg and evaluated for economic potential. Given the existing information and the preliminary data the company has gathered so far, we anticipate $6,000 per ton of value at present prices for both antimony and gold. Our preliminary analysis shows the deposit will be economic from antimony revenue alone, with the gold serving as an additional byproduct of the operation. Work during this last quarter has centered on rehabilitating the seven-mile access road to the site from the Dalton Highway so that heavy equipment can be mobilized by the third-party mining contractor we selected. Since our mining contractor mobilized over a month ago, work has started on rehabilitating the access to the underground and bringing it up to modern standards. To supply water for operations throughout the year, U.S. Antimony has drilled two new wells on site, and those are now available as private water sources. Safety procedures and SOPs have been put together and submitted to MSHA for approval. We have also been coordinating with the BLM and third-party cultural specialists to steer clear of any historical resources and to clean up the area so the site is ready for operations. U.S. Antimony is focused on using our people, our expertise, and our financial wherewithal to properly clean up the site, to carry on the exploration, and to define a production program that the property merits. We are working on filing a plan of operations that would cover full-scale underground mining of the stibnite and gold that constitute the major portion of the veins running into the side of the hill. An independent S-K 1300 technical report, written by an independent professional geologist who is well-known to the USAC staff and throughout Alaska, was finished recently. That report shows the measured and indicated material carries average grades of 26% antimony and 0.37 oz per ton gold, which gives a contained value of $386 million at current prices as shared in our recent press release and Form 8-K filing with the SEC. Back to you, Gary.
Gary C. Evans
executiveThanks, Will. Let's now move on to Aaron Tenesch. Aaron?
Aaron Tenesch
executiveThanks, Gary. I'll concentrate my comments on three specific areas: how we source antimony, the critical mineral mill at Radersburg, and our joint venture with Americas Gold and Silver. We continue to ship antimony feedstock on a regular basis to both the Thompson Falls and Madero operations. Madero receives roughly 200 tons of smelter-ready ore each month, while Thompson Falls takes in about 400 tons per month of various midstream or metallic feedstocks, largely sourced from abroad. The hydromet facility in Bolivia, though its deliveries are running well behind schedule, continues to ramp up and provides us with valuable insight and experience that will benefit the hydromet system we are currently designing through our joint venture with Americas Gold and Silver. We are also continuing to develop additional sources of supply. Regarding Radersburg, Montana, in Q3 that location began operating so we could process the approximately 2,800 tons of high-grade ore that has already been mined and delivered to us from Stibnite Hill, Montana. Samples taken from the feed belt of that ore have assayed at 10% to 16% antimony. A batch of processed concentrates is now prepared for shipment to the Madero smelter, and material has been dispatched to the Thompson Falls facility for additional processing aimed at producing mil-spec antimony trisulfide. Right now, the Radersburg facility is in a short shutdown so we can install some advanced flotation equipment. That includes an Eriez StackCell, Eriez column flotation, and a second, larger plate and frame filter press. This new equipment will let us handle higher throughput of the high-grade stibnite feeds coming from Stibnite Hill, as well as material from our Nolan Creek, Alaska mine, which we opened recently. It will also produce two concentrates: one with antimony concentrations suitable for mil-spec antimony trisulfide production, and one at typical smelter grades that will support optimal recoveries. At Radersburg, we're in the middle of a major electrical service upgrade. It will allow the crushing circuit to operate on line power, and it will also deliver more capacity for the flotation equipment we've just installed as well as for additions down the road. After the existing operating crew has been trained and has grown comfortable with the new flotation equipment, we'll move into a second phase involving additional hiring and expanded shifts. Our new on-site lab is now fully commissioned and runs every day, handling sample prep, fire assay, digestion and titration, flotation testing, and XRF analysis with the new 3,000-watt Rigaku Primus III+ wavelength dispersive XRF unit. We're also continuing upgrades to the air handling system and ancillary equipment, which keep improving safety, performance, and overall efficiency. Our Idaho joint venture alongside Americas Gold and Silver keeps moving forward toward the final engineering stages. We expect to share additional announcements about these efforts soon. Test works is still designing and safeguarding an improved process that makes the best use of reagents and brings together tetrahedrite and stibnite feedstocks. Just to remind everybody, the sole antimony output in North America comes from Americas Gold and Silver and from us. Every bit of antimony in our operating systems gets processed by us. No one else does that. Thank you — Gary, back to you.
Gary C. Evans
executiveThanks, Aaron; now let's jump to Jonathan Miller, in charge of investor relations. Jonathan?
Jonathan Miller
executiveThanks, Gary. I'll focus my remarks on our capital markets activity in Q3, how our shareholder base has broadened and developed, and the adjustments we're making to investor relations going forward. Let me begin with what's plain to see. Our stock has fallen significantly over the last six months, and we get why that's frustrating for current holders; we also recognize that investor expectations haven't always lined up with when our operational execution and financial results actually land. We need to respond to that with results, steadier communication, and more openness regarding our progress. While we have no influence over wider market forces, heavy short interest, or near-term trading patterns, we do have control over the effectiveness of our investor communication, the strength of our institutional ties, and the expectations we establish. Ultimately, we feel that steady execution paired with increased transparency represents the best path to fostering investor confidence. During Q3, we continued broadening our institutional outreach efforts, in the U.S. and abroad, and we experienced immediate uptake overseas. Our inaugural international non-deal roadshow took place in London, arranged via Barclays Bank, and there Gary and I sat down with institutional investors, presenting U.S. Antimony to an entirely new slice of the global investment community. On the domestic side, we participated in the Piper Sandler Growth Frontiers Conference and kept up our institutional outreach via other meetings and non-deal roadshows. In addition, we wrapped up a non-deal roadshow with Texas Capital Securities, which initiated equity research coverage on U.S. Antimony only last month, setting a target price of $9.50 per share. We've also chosen to focus more heavily on finding and cultivating ties with fundamental long-term institutional investors — ones who grasp the capital needs, operational complexity, and timelines that building a domestic critical minerals supply chain entails. What we want is shareholders who judge us by execution, production growth, contract fulfillment, financial performance, and the long-term economics of our assets, instead of short-term trading momentum. In the quarter, some of our directors—our CEO and senior leadership among them—bought more UAMY stock on the open market. In a separate action during August, the board approved a buyback program worth as much as $100 million, which Shawn already described in his remarks. It's worth considering just how much ground we've covered in a fairly brief span. Under three years back, United States Antimony was a company that looked quite different. Back when this leadership group stepped in around late 2023, institutional investors were essentially absent from our shareholder base. Our operating presence was far smaller, we had little visibility in the capital markets, we held no meaningful sales contracts, and the company simply hadn't reached the scale or built the financial wherewithal to go after the opportunities sitting in front of us. From there, we replaced the entire leadership team and board, substantially strengthened the balance sheet, expanded our mining and processing operations, secured major contracts with both government and commercial counterparties, grew the business with no debt, took annual revenue from about $8 million in 2023 to more than $39 million in 2025, and pushed institutional ownership past 60% of our outstanding shares. As of September 30, 2026, our balance sheet included roughly $51 million across cash equivalents, bonds, and debt and equity securities. That provides us with considerable financial capacity to support both our current operations and our expansion plans. In addition, we have expanded the analyst coverage of our equity, strengthened relationships across the institutional investment community, and established a much broader footprint in the capital markets. Going forward, we are equally focused on growing domestic demand for antimony, particularly from the U.S. defense industrial base. Federal programs tied to Executive Order 14415—signed on July 20, 2026, and set to take effect in January 2027—are designed to reduce reliance on critical minerals from abroad, and they are creating openings for domestic producers. We are the sole one. We're actively seeking out manufacturers and defense contractors that rely on antimony, and we're coordinating with the U.S. government to help smooth their transition to a dependable domestic supply. With our expanded production capacity coming online, we anticipate opportunities to substantially grow commercial antimony ATO sales in 2027. We're also pursuing further government funding opportunities to back the expansion and diversification of our critical minerals operations. Back in September, we submitted a $45 million project proposal to the U.S. Department of State through its U.S.-Africa Strategic Investment Program, requesting $36 million in federal funding. That proposed project centers on critical minerals infrastructure, logistics, and supply chain development along the Chad-Cameroon corridor. On a different note, we put forward a pair of proposals worth roughly $110 million via the Defense Industrial Base Consortium (DIBC), aimed at exploring, extracting, and hydrometallurgically processing tungsten here at home. Each proposal has made it past an initial screening stage and is still being evaluated for possible follow-on action. Taken together, these efforts amount to about $124 million in prospective fresh government funding. No awards have been made as yet, but the figures illustrate how we keep working to capture growth opportunities backed by the government. What investors are looking for now is for the infrastructure that's been built, the capital that's been put to work, and the contracts that have been signed to show up as steady production gains, higher sales, and better financial results. That expectation makes sense, it comes through in today's numbers, and it's exactly where we remain focused. On the investor relations side, our job is to report that progress honestly, tackle problems head-on, and cultivate a shareholder base that grasps both the upside and the risks in our business. Looking ahead, we'll do fewer wide-ranging promotional pushes and instead put more effort into real dialogue with long-only institutions whose goals line up with our long-term strategy. Our view is that taking a stricter approach to targeting investors, paired with more transparent operations and execution we can actually measure, is the proper route to keep strengthening the confidence investors place in us. Appreciate it — Gary, back to you.
Gary C. Evans
executiveThank you, Jonathan. Before I wrap up and we move into a question-and-answer session, there are a couple of things I want to call attention to. As everyone is aware, no company amounts to much without capable, qualified management. I'd like to spotlight some recent hires that took place during 2026. Back in February, we brought on a manager of engineering. March saw us hire a Managing Director of Engineering along with a Country Manager for the country of Mexico. In April, a controller joined the accounting department. June brought a Managing Director of Critical Minerals, who is a geologist. August is when we added a Chief Accounting Officer. September saw us bring in a General Manager of the two Thompson Falls smelters, and in October, our new Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer — the person you heard from today, Shawn Winkler — came aboard. November brought a Corporate Environmental Safety Manager. Once again, we've essentially built this team from scratch to reach where we stand now. Another point worth raising relates to the November federal elections. Clearly, the U.S. experienced a major shift in both the House and the Senate. Given that, what impact will it have on the critical mineral space? My view is very little, since this is a bipartisan matter rather than something belonging only to Republicans. Some individuals currently serving at various agencies will probably depart, given that they were appointed, but I expect that to be limited in scope. From where we sit, consider that the Executive Order taking effect January 1 originated as a Biden Executive Order. In my view, our space enjoys solid protection; it's badly needed, and everybody knows it. I don't believe it will affect us much at all. Let me summarize. Today we just reported what I regard as a very good quarter, with progress achieved on all fronts; even so, it's not yet where we want to be. Antimony prices are beyond our control, but we have navigated them extremely well through a declining market by raising volume sales and, more importantly, by significantly improving our margins. Margins ought to be the thing everybody focuses on. My belief is that shareholders will reward us much better through stronger margins than through sales carrying limited margins. While our inventory sits at record highs, write-downs have been minimal; this has not been an easy task. We have a new General Manager in Thompson Falls who started several months ago. His one primary mission is to increase volumes of finished products so that larger and larger ingots and ATO move to both the DLA and our expanding industrial customer base; but he has to do it safely. That is a prime factor in our business. Our two most important new critical mineral plays that Joe and Will touched on, the Fostung Tungsten up in Ontario and the Nolan Creek in Alaska, are progressing quickly. We are eager to report progress on these two plays in early 2027, with material currently being assayed in our own lab in Montana. Our liquidity position is excellent. It's remained essentially flat throughout the entire year, even while our capital expenditure program kept expanding. Again, that's not an easy thing to accomplish. It ought to get even better by the end of the year thanks to steps we're taking to boost our liquidity, including collecting money the government owes us and getting some notes repaid. Now, on competition. In North America, we have none. We keep a close watch on all the competitors who'd like to be in our shoes, and there are plenty of them. Nobody is coming for at least three years, or even more, in my view. Most of them are going to flounder, and a few are going to fail. By growing larger more quickly, we're securing our ongoing success. Personally, I want to give credit to the whole management team at United States Antimony Corporation for the hard work they've put in, for everything we've accomplished so very fast, and for where I see our future heading. Operator, at this point I'd like to take questions from our listening audience.
Jonathan Miller
executiveThanks. First off, for the first quarter of 2027, is your raw material inventory big enough that you can keep making sufficient product to bring in strong revenue for Q1?
Gary C. Evans
executiveYes, absolutely — we're purchasing inventory nearly every week, and Aaron can chime in here shortly. Right now, our balance sheet shows the biggest inventory level we've ever carried. Frankly, we're working hard to bring that down substantially, and that is exactly what's going on at Thompson Falls. The amount of antimony coming off the tailgate of that plant has our new plant manager setting records. Securing inventory and sourcing raw material isn't the issue. Buying it at the right price is the issue; we've declined many customers, and we will purchase at the right price so shareholders get the margins they deserve. Next question.
Jonathan Miller
executiveMoving to the next question. Could you give us some color on how we ought to think about the planned sales into the DLA contract for 2027, on a quarterly basis?
Gary C. Evans
executiveObviously, hitting that target has proven pretty difficult for us. I think we explained during today's call the reasons behind that; satisfying each DLA requirement isn't an easy task; we continue getting better at it. They continue getting better at it as well. My sense is that we've got a reasonably smooth operation going now. Of course, we still have a great deal to deliver to the DLA, and our intention is to expand that considerably. Once a commodity's price drops from roughly $30 per pound down to $8 per pound, you have no choice but to move far quicker simply to counter that price decline; we're achieving that through volumes. That's why we moved to volume projections rather than dollar projections, because the commodity price sits outside our control. When our price drops, we buy it at a lower cost. What I mean is, we're purchasing raw ore at below $5 per pound, and at $14.06 per pound on the selling side that spread is what we protect. So we're making every effort to preserve those margins, and we've turned away plenty of people eager to sell us product since their price isn't low enough, and we'll be sure to keep doing that. One thing that gives me pause when discussing volumes is this: we won't just create sales for the sake of creating sales. That would be crazy; we want to make money. That's the goal. Ensuring we purchase product the right way, purchase it from the right parties, purchase it with concentrate high enough that we don't need to work so hard raising it to a mil-spec material, all of that matters for reaching our success. Next question.
Jonathan Miller
executiveMoving to the next question. Antimony pricing has fallen from $31/lb on a shipment made earlier to $14.6/lb for the most recent order, and that still sits at a premium over the $8 a pound spot price. As we look toward 2027, what sets the premium level in your contracts, and what is your read on the antimony demand market? And with the DLA acceptance process running slower than expected, what quarterly delivery volume can the government realistically achieve in 2027? Do you anticipate any shifts on the government side with the new Congress?
Gary C. Evans
executiveRegarding your final question about the contract: once a contract is signed, it stands as is, so that matter is settled. We anticipate no modifications. Both the DLA and the DOW have told us they are highly satisfied with our performance; we are considerably ahead of the planned timeline, despite the fact that the quantities we are shipping remain below what we had projected. Those volumes are increasing month by month. In today's report, we noted that October set a company record for shipments to the DLA. So indeed, the price does decline; it is variable and gets determined whenever a purchase order is placed; we still have substantial antimony to deliver at prices well above $8 per pound. Keep in mind that our pricing also includes specific fees and embedded costs that aren't visible to you. So the DLA clearly wants additional material. My own view is that this contract will expand considerably once we complete more deliveries. Once again, nobody else is supplying the DLA besides us, and we're aware their inventory stands at a very low level. So I foresee a strong future stretching many years with the DLA, along with the relationships we build and the credibility we've established with the Department of War, and I expect us simply to keep raising our revenue and sales to the DLA quarter after quarter.
Jonathan Miller
executiveThank you.
Gary C. Evans
executiveNext question.
Jonathan Miller
executiveMoving to the next question: what has Radersburg cost you so far, and how should we view spending as the site ramps up in the future, ideally quarter by quarter?
Gary C. Evans
executiveSo the cash we laid out at Radersburg went toward buying the facility, and that came in just under $5 million. We then sank probably close to $2 million more into the place, and that covers the lab plus the extra equipment Aaron brought up when he was speaking. At this point we're essentially finished. The DLA will be handing us some money as part of the Radersburg retrofit. My understanding is that it was approved only a couple of weeks back, unless I'm mistaken, Aaron. But on your question, extra capital for Radersburg is quite limited at this stage. I mean, we've basically completed everything that needs doing.
Jonathan Miller
executiveThanks. Moving to the next question. Regarding the DLA lots, sampling for TF-8 through TF-11 all happened in early October, and you mentioned a 55-day cycle from sampling to acceptance. Based on that timeline, it looks like all four lots might be accepted before year-end, yet only TF-8 and TF-9 are included in the high end of guidance. Could you take us through that?
Gary C. Evans
executiveJust because something gets accepted doesn't guarantee we get paid. There are certain generally accepted accounting principles around government contracts that govern how we can book that in that quarter, and I'll let Shawn jump in here because he's better at this than I am. Shawn, do you want to jump in?
Shawn Winkler
executiveYes, that timeline for sampling is right. We're simply improving, keeping things conservative in that same spirit.
Gary C. Evans
executiveWe're losing you, Shawn; we're losing you.
Shawn Winkler
executiveOh.
Gary C. Evans
executiveYeah, we can't hear a word you're saying, Shawn.
Shawn Winkler
executiveOkay. Is that better?
Gary C. Evans
executiveYes.
Shawn Winkler
executiveAll right, and I apologize for that. In terms of what's within our control — sampling and cycle times are improving — but release isn't something we can control. DLA reviews our sampling, then we ship, and after that they run their own testing. So, trying not to overpromise, we figure it's reasonable that only two of those go at the high end. If we do better than that, great. But once more, those portions of the delivery scheme are outside our control, and we just want to stay as conservative as we can, and we believe that's the best estimate available to us today.
Jonathan Miller
executiveThank you, Shawn. Next question.
Gary C. Evans
executiveNext question.
Jonathan Miller
executiveYou mentioned that demand from industrial customers keeps rising. Since antimony pricing outside the exchange swings quite widely, has that volatile or inadequate pricing led you to turn down any orders?
Gary C. Evans
executiveAppreciate that. So we do have a pricing committee now — I think it's made up of four or five folks from the company — and in the past 60 to 90 days alone, we've walked away from a fair number of orders. We think we've handled it well, since new customers have taken those orders, or the same customers came back a second or third time after turning down the price initially. What's driving that? Nobody else makes antimony in America. There's an executive order kicking in January 1 requiring anyone selling to the military to buy from an American company. And our quality is very high. It's clear that some buyers have sourced ATO from abroad and resold it. Those wholesalers moved it via their distribution networks and ended up losing customers because of quality problems. We're confident our quality is the best, and since we're the sole domestic manufacturer, we believe a premium is justified. Over the past 60 to 90 days, we've turned down ATO purchase offers fairly often. As a matter of fact, Fastmarkets is, I believe, launching a new American price next week, and that ought to work in our favor.
Jonathan Miller
executiveThanks. Moving to the next question. Regarding Thompson Falls and Madero, combined capacity comes to 500 tons per month, but real output has been building up more slowly than we first expected. Can you give us some detail on how much of that capacity is being used at each site right now, which operational limits are still in place, and what quarterly antimony production you think can be reached as we head into 2027? Also, going forward, should we look for more explicit volume guidance instead of mostly depending on capacity targets?
Gary C. Evans
executiveOkay, let's begin with Mexico. Without a doubt, Mexico gave us some problems. When I brought up the new hires, I mentioned a new country manager over there—he's an engineer, he speaks Spanish—and that situation is resolved. Processed material can now come from Mexico to Thompson Falls, and we're moving it on a weekly basis. So Thompson Falls is receiving a new supply out of Mexico that it hadn't seen for two years. That has changed, and it ought to let Thompson Falls process more material at a faster pace. What's causing the delay at Thompson Falls? As you know, we built a new facility and it went live in May. Not every furnace was operating; one contractor in particular had been giving us trouble for more than a year—they sold us inferior equipment and delivered late—and we'd basically had enough. I won't spell out precisely what it was used for, since we've sued them to recover our costs, and we've turned to another third party to manufacture these parts, and that work is essentially finished now. So we had a hold-up on furnaces that were fully built and brand new because certain parts needed to make those furnaces productive were missing. That too has largely been corrected, and it caused a delay. People are another factor. We had to bring on a lot of new staff, we had to train them, and we knew changes were needed at Thompson Falls. Following an exhaustive search for a qualified person, we brought in a new general manager, and he has performed extremely well—he's even better. On the people side, we've had to shift the culture and the mindset at Thompson Falls, and we've gotten that done. I've traveled up there a couple of times, tried to meet with the people, telling them we have to move faster and we have to get better, and we are. Safety matters a great deal. As I said when discussing new hires, we brought on a new safety manager who will oversee things company-wide. So we're doing everything we said we would. It's simply taking longer. People don't grasp that this is a very complicated business. There's a reason we have no competition. What we do isn't easy, and we've been at it for a long time. We had some old methods that we've had to change, and we've had to bring in new people to make those changes; we built a new facility that's much more efficient and much more robust, and we will reach those numbers. I have no doubt about it given the team we've assembled, but it isn't happening as quickly as we'd like. Antimony prices have been a big part of that. Once prices decline, folks simply hold off and wait. No orders get placed, nobody wants to sell, everyone's hunting for the floor. That floor came 60, 90 days back, and at this point deals are achievable. Quite a few of the factors behind our delivery delays sit outside our control, and shareholders should recognize that. Still, if you examine quarterly production, it keeps rising steadily, and my belief is you'll witness that across all of 2027. Predicting is tough, really tough, with so many moving pieces involved, such as purchasing the antimony, loading it onto a vessel, whether it gets held up, receiving it at a port, whether inspection happens. A great many factors are involved in bringing that antimony to a point where a finished product becomes possible. Forecasting is extraordinarily difficult; it amounts to tossing darts at a wall. That's the reason we shifted toward a volume prediction instead of a price prediction, since prices aren't ours to control. And my feeling about where we're headed is great. It's simply unfolding more slowly than we first expected.
Jonathan Miller
executiveThanks, Gary. I believe we’ve got time for roughly two to three additional questions. What are the main factors behind antimony pricing, given that China and Russia produce the largest amounts and aren’t shipping to outside buyers? Why are prices so low for the other suppliers serving the rest of the world?
Gary C. Evans
executiveHey, Aaron, you want to answer that question? You're the procurement manager.
Aaron Tenesch
executiveHonestly, the strongest response I can offer is that the idea China, and possibly Russia, isn't exporting to the rest of the world is completely wrong. We're aware that we encounter Chinese pricing across numerous regions. There's also additional competition for raw material that in fact reverberates globally through that same dynamic, since we're aware that China is likewise our biggest rival on the raw materials front. So, thanks to a few of those elements Gary mentioned before, we're aware that we're delivering a steadier and calmer market to North America as we isolate certain of these more unstable markets from ours.
Gary C. Evans
executiveJonathan, let's do one more question, okay?
Jonathan Miller
executiveOkay. If we bring in a targeted monthly supply of 150 tons from Bolivia plus 120 tons per month out of Canada, how much of what you need for feedstock in 2027 is locked in, considering that average cost per pound fell 51% year over year in Q3 2026? And how much more margin upside might there be once Stibnite Hill and Nolan Creek start supplying a larger share of feedstock?
Gary C. Evans
executiveThat's a fair question. To start, Aaron noted that the Bolivian shipment of antimony flake from the hydromet facility located there has come in at a terribly low level. It's been very disappointing. Earlier in the year we were looking for 150 tons per month, and what we've received hasn't even reached 100 tons. So right now, that's not something we can rely on. That's part of why we're being repaid on our note. The outcome at that facility has let us down. From a mechanical standpoint, the facility is in good shape. The problems have been on the operational side. So we clearly have to source material elsewhere. Our Canadian source has been stable for a long time and keeps growing in volume annually. And again, we're the only company able to process that material. Without us processing it, it would end up in a hazardous waste dump; so I feel very good about that, and about the pricing tied to it. Aaron is bringing in material from several different countries. We keep approving new contracts and new relationships. People are approaching us constantly. When I open my email each morning, I usually find three or four parties from around the world looking to sell us antimony, and I pass all of them to Aaron. It's like a bird's nest, trying to work out who is on first, who is a broker, and who actually holds the real material, and that's something Aaron handles daily. Some of these people he has been working with for two, three years. Aaron, would you like to jump in and address some of those points?
Aaron Tenesch
executiveYes, I can. I believe a lot of those factors were actually mentioned briefly in some of the other questions and in the excellent responses you gave, Gary. We keep working on strengthening our relationships, and naturally we now have a fairly extensive network and system in place for handling these different sources and getting to the bottom of what they really are. I think it's also worth pointing out that our own material flow from our mines and through both of our facilities keeps moving forward as well and turns out additional feed at an internal price that will be lower than the rest. There are more specifics that we won't make public, since that would only increase competition, and I'd have 63 new brokers phoning me. It's fair to say we have international reps, and we have contacts and contracts that are constantly being developed.
Gary C. Evans
executiveRegarding Stibnite Hill, which Joe managed to locate and from which more than 2,000 tons of material has been moved to Radersburg, we'll start processing that, I'd expect, before the year is out. Is that correct, Aaron?
Aaron Tenesch
executiveRight, so a shipment ought to head out — concentrates, plus a bit of straight stibnite we can pull from the pile with no processing at all — and that should be on its way down to Madero for the first stage of processing in roughly seven days.
Gary C. Evans
executiveRegarding Nolan Creek, that's a 2,000-ton bulk sample, and clearly we don't have it in hand yet; our hope is to get it before the year is out. Is that correct?
Will Werner
executiveYes, that's correct.
Gary C. Evans
executiveWill, can you jump in there?
Will Werner
executiveWe are all set and only waiting on the final approval from MSHA so we can head underground. Nothing needs to be developed in order to reach it. The exploration drift that the previous operator completed gives us immediate access to ore faces. We expect that once Mine Safety and Health Administration grants us that approval, we will be in a position to start gathering that sample. Should we manage to have it all on the ground by the 21st of December, we would then be able to get the entire amount delivered to Radersburg by December 31st.
Gary C. Evans
executiveGreat. Okay. Well, thank you. I believe we've reached the end of the questions for today. At this point we've spent roughly an hour on this call. Should any particular questions remain unanswered, please don't hesitate to reach out to Jonathan, and we'll do our best to get back to you with answers. We appreciate the confidence you've shown in us. Once again, I feel we delivered a good quarter, and we're eager to see further improvements as the year goes on and into 2027. Have a nice day.
Operator
operatorThanks for joining us; that wraps up today’s webcast, and you’re welcome to disconnect your lines now. We appreciate your participation.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete United States Antimony Corporation transcript — plus 133,000+ transcripts from 7,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to United States Antimony Corporation earnings transcripts and 133,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $39.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.
More tools for stock research
OptionsBell: an unusual options activity scanner that tracks options flow across all US stocks and emails you when large trades appear in United States Antimony Corporation or any ticker on your watchlist.
StockMarketScan: a stock screener with alerts: 24 pre-built screens refreshed every 5 minutes, watchlists and email notifications. Both offer API and MCP access and fair monthly pricing.