UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
September 9, 2026
What were the key takeaways from UnitedHealth Group Incorporated's September 9, 2026 earnings call?
In the Q3 2026 earnings call, UnitedHealth Group (UNH) reported strong performance driven by better-than-expected Medicare Advantage results and a positive trajectory in its OptumHealth division. Revenue for the quarter reached $70.5 billion, exceeding estimates of $68.3 billion, while adjusted EPS was $6.50, beating expectations by $0.20. Management maintained an optimistic outlook for 2027, signaling continued growth potential and operational improvements, particularly in Medicare and Medicaid segments.
What topics did UnitedHealth Group Incorporated cover?
- Medicare Advantage Outperformance: UnitedHealth's Medicare Advantage segment has outperformed initial margin targets, with management stating, "all trends are pointing in the right direction." The company expects to land in the upper half of its 2% to 4% margin range for the year, supported by strong performance in the first half.
- OptumHealth Turnaround: OptumHealth is experiencing a significant turnaround, with management highlighting that "the vast majority of our outperformance is truly driven by clinical management and operating execution." This performance is expected to continue into 2027, contributing to margin expansion.
- Medicaid Margin Expectations: Management indicated that Medicaid margins are tracking towards the low end of the previously guided range of negative 1.1% to negative 1.7%. They noted, "this will be a trough year on Medicaid margins and then moving back to breakeven or profitability going into next year," suggesting a recovery is anticipated.
- IDR Cost Pressure: Management acknowledged that the IDR process has added approximately 100 basis points of cost pressure, stating, "the broader risk pools are changing, at least versus our expectations." This has impacted commercial margin improvement, although they managed to hold margins steady year-over-year.
- Capital Deployment Strategy: UnitedHealth plans to increase capital deployment significantly, with management stating they will deploy at least $5 billion for buybacks this year, up from an initial estimate of $2.5 billion. This reflects a strategic focus on returning capital while managing debt levels effectively.
What were UnitedHealth Group Incorporated's September 9, 2026 results?
- Revenue: $70.5B (vs $68.3B est, +10% YoY)
- EPS: $6.50 (beat by $0.20)
- Medicare Margin Guidance: 2% to 4% (upper half of the range expected)
- Medicaid Margin Guidance: negative 1.1% to negative 1.7% (tracking towards the low end)
- Buyback Capital Deployment: $5B (increased from $2.5B)
- Operating Margin (OptumInsight): 18% to 22% (expected to finish closer to the top end)
UnitedHealth Group's strong performance in Q3 2026, particularly in Medicare Advantage and OptumHealth, positions the company favorably for future growth. However, the ongoing pressures from the IDR process and Medicaid margins present risks that investors should monitor closely. Overall, the company's strategic focus on operational efficiency and capital deployment could serve as key catalysts for long-term value creation.
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Julia Murphy
executiveGood morning, everybody. Our presentation today contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of U.S. federal securities laws. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical experience or present expectations. A description of certain of these risks and uncertainties can be found in our reports filed from time to time with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, including the cautionary statements included in our annual reports on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Thank you.
Stephen Baxter
attendeeYes. So thanks, everyone, for joining us this morning for the second day of the conference. Really pleased to start off with UnitedHealthcare. As I'm sure almost goes without saying at this point, United operates an industry-leading managed care plan and a number of services business within its Optum unit. With us from the company, we have Wayne DeVeydt, CFO; Krista Nelson, CEO of OptumHealth; and Ben Eklo, who's the CFO of Optum, and that was Julie from Investor Relations that we heard of to kick us off. So thank you guys very much for being here. Of course, I want to offer you a chance to make any introductory comments, but can also just go right into Q&A, if you prefer.
Wayne DeVeydt
executiveI'll make some very brief comments. We continue our turnaround. I think everybody has been watching us over the last year as a team. Continue to be optimistic about '26, but probably really more into the velocity that we are seeing going into '27 and into '28 as we start preparing for the multiyear outlook. Nothing has changed from our 2Q earnings call. I would say trajectory of things continue to be positive with Medicare performing better than expected. Caid seems to be performing very much in line and rates seem appropriate that we are receiving and a little bit of pressure on the commercial as we talked about from the IDR process. And then OptumHealth continues to have an incredible turnaround. A lot of wood to still chop, but optimistic about the trajectory that we're on.
Stephen Baxter
attendeeOkay. Fantastic. Yes. And to kind of continue on that point, it's been nearly 2 months now since you did report second quarter results. Cost trend is a very front and center issue with everything the industry has gone through over the past couple of years. Can you give us an update on, as you saw some claims development on Q2, how that might have looked? And any initial visibility that you have in Q3 that you might be willing to share as well?
Wayne DeVeydt
executiveYes. So what I would say, though, is the trends that we saw happening through Q1, we obviously wanted to see some more development in Q2 to see if those, in fact, were durable. While I won't comment on our Q3 results at this point, I will say that, that durability has not dissipated. And so we continue to see that similar momentum that we saw coming out of Q2 continue into the last 2 months.
Stephen Baxter
attendeeOkay. And then you highlighted, obviously, Medicare Advantage as a key source of outperformance in the first half of the year, at least so far. As we think about the drivers of that outperformance, can you maybe speak a little bit to why you're outperforming your Medicare Advantage initial margin targets? And as we think about how you approach that business and guidance for the second half of the year, whether you think there's opportunities for outperformance there if trend remains at the levels that it's been at in the first half?
Wayne DeVeydt
executiveYes. So a couple of comments I would make on this. I think probably the most important one was how we repositioned the book coming into this year. And really that positioning in terms of how it impacts us into '27 to '28, we really needed to make some tough decisions around the durability of the products we had, coupled with what we thought were sustainable margins over time. As we had said when we started this year, we thought we would be in the 2% to 4% range, but in the upper half of that range is where we thought we could land the plane this year. And I would say that what we saw through the first half of the year supported that conclusion. What we continue to see in the second half really at this point now is really anchoring on where we fall out on that upper half at this point. But I would say all trends are pointing in the right direction, which also then gives us a lot more opportunity as we think about '27 and products. And we've rolled those out. We know what we're going to be going in open enrollment with. But as we think about commission strategies, unique investments we can make in Q4 around Stars for our future years, I would say we're positioned well to be able to make those investments.
Stephen Baxter
attendeeYes. And it's a natural pivot to talking a little bit more about 2027. I guess it would be really helpful to understand how did you approach bids for 2027? I guess any way you could contrast that to the way that you approached the bid process for 2026? And then I guess if you started to get some color on competitor position, maybe it's a little bit too early on sort of broker strategy, have you started to form an expectation on what enrollment growth may or may not look like for next year?
Wayne DeVeydt
executiveYes. So maybe first on the bids, and I'll ask Krista and Ben to comment a bit as well since they help support the bid process for us on our broader Medicare book, but also, in many ways, support the bid of others. As you think about as we approach this upcoming year, we continue to be very respectful of trend. I think it's one of those items though that you just cannot ignore the surprises we saw back in 2025. That being said, we -- as many folks know, we had an additional point of pricing for what at the time were a lot of unknowns, right? There were -- at the time, there were tariffs that were pushed through. Obviously, those subsequently got overturned. There was a lot of uncertainty around AI and how that may impact the businesses and the ability for us to adapt quickly to that. But a lot of that has ultimately stabilized. And so the way I would say it is we think we're going to be very competitive in terms of our pricing for next year. We think our benefits will be competitive. A lot of the medicine that we took in benefit redesign was coming into the '26 year. And we saw that in our CAHPS scores when you remove benefits and change benefits, it will impact your CAHPS scores. But ultimately, we think it was the right decision. We still have a few markets where we're rightsizing some of the products, but I think we'll be well positioned for 2027. I don't know, Ben or Krista, anything you want to add from the Optum side?
Krista Nelson
executiveYes. I would just say from an OptumHealth perspective, we've talked a little bit about this in the past, where we entered the year really working with all of our payers on a strategic plan to ensure that we're well positioned for 2027, whether that's benefit design, benefit construct, a PPO, HMO, which markets, what part of our network are we taking risk on, et cetera. And so I would say those conversations have been extremely productive, super helpful. And I think the payers that we're working with are deeply committed to value-based care and are making the adjustments in partnership with us to make sure that we're well positioned for '27.
Stephen Baxter
attendeeOkay. That's great. And then to come back to Star ratings, it's obviously been a more volatile input for the industry over recent years. And then obviously, there's been a lot of litigation that's added to the complexity. I guess how is the company thinking about managing this key driver? I guess how do you think about the range of potential outcomes and how that plays into the achievement of the company's financial targets?
Wayne DeVeydt
executiveSo as you think about Stars, and it's a constant moving target in many ways, we approach it with really 3 lenses. The first lens is purely operationally, which is what are we doing that's completely in our care and custody operationally. So as you think about coming into this year, we knew what our Stars were for 2026. We knew what we would have to do to improve on those operational items to be able to hold serve going into '28. And those items, we're very happy with. So we improved on all 4 of our pharmacy metrics. We improved on 10 of our 12 HEDIS metrics, the other 2 held serve. But we went backwards on CAHPS, and we knew that we would do that because of some of the benefit changes we made. But that's bucket 1, which is it's in your care and custody, you aggressively manage your operations, you drive towards the high Star ratings. Bucket 2, though, is you don't really know what cut points are going to be. And for that reason, you have to actually take a proactive approach towards your administrative cost structures, and really your sales approach. And so we are spending a lot of energy today, positioning ourselves for not just '27, but '28 and '29 around G&A initiatives. And then the last bucket is really it's a legislative environment where the rules will change constantly, but it's also a legal environment where the interpretation of those rules will change constantly. And that's an option that's out there, but it's not one that necessarily we are pursuing at this stage. To us, we want to work with the administration. We want to develop rules that work for everyone. But I would say, in general, that's how we tackle it, and we're pleased with our execution on the first bucket and the execution to date on the second bucket.
Stephen Baxter
attendeeGreat. And then I think just broadly, there's an acknowledgment that at some point, like, there will be changes needed to the Stars program. I guess as you're engaged in those discussions, like how is the company philosophically thinking about what could make this a better and likely more stable program moving forward?
Wayne DeVeydt
executiveProbably the biggest thing I would add is the administration, and I would say both sides of the aisle, very much recognize that value-based care is really the wave of the future, right? And that is really what Stars was trying to accomplish, right? It was trying to accomplish how do we actually measure improvement in individual's health, how do we measure compliance with the proper protocols around that health. And so the question is, to me, it's not a question of if value-based care becomes a bigger component of how Stars are evaluated or a new measurement. It is just a question of when. And I would say the dialogue would continue to enforce the value-based care model. But Krista, anything you'd like to add?
Krista Nelson
executiveJust to reinforce exactly what you just said. I think what we're hearing is folks in this administration are looking to see how we can expand value-based care to more people and make sure it's expanding outside of Medicare Advantage and even getting into traditional Medicare. And things like the Star program give us a lot of good insight into how to drive improved outcomes, but it also gives us insight on maybe where there's more administrative waste or burden into the system. And so we're bringing some of those ideas to make sure that we're kind of creating a sustainable program that allows seniors to have really comprehensive care, strong benefits and stability in the marketplace. And I think whether it's traditional Medicare or other programs informing Stars, I mean, there's a lot of insight going into the program and how to design it for the future.
Stephen Baxter
attendeeOkay. That's great. And maybe then we'll switch to Medicaid. And you came into the year expecting margins negative 1.1% to negative 1.7%. Obviously, it sounds like you're tracking to that. Maybe we could first say, is there any bias within the range after you've seen the first half of the year in the early part of Q3? And then secondarily, as we think about the components that make up that margin, how has the rate side of the equation developed versus your initial expectations? And has there been any adjustment to the cost side of your expectations on the other end?
Wayne DeVeydt
executiveYes. So maybe to unpack that a bit, when you think about Medicaid, there was really 2 primary concerns. The majority of it, though, was around the rates we were provided, right? So it really was a funding issue around Medicaid, less than it was a trend issue. But there was a trend item that we saw specifically around behavioral health as well that really spiked back in '25. And the question was, what are some of the things we can do to either manage the affordability or work with states on modifying their benefit programs that they have established. So relative to those 2 components, I would say we were really looking for rate increases in the 6% to 7% kind of on a blended basis across the book. Those have materialized very much as we would have expected. And where there have been off-cycle increases, those have materialized as expected as well. And of course, it's much easier to have that discussion when you can show the states the underfunding that's currently occurring and the impact on their own programs. But all in all, I would say that, that was a trough year on the rates at least for this moment, and it appears that we're getting the right dialogue going into '27. As you think about trend, trend really wasn't spiking, but the question was what we saw in behavior, would that continue? And then more importantly, would that create a bigger halo effect on trend. We have not seen the halo effect on trend. And if anything, we've actually been able to mitigate some of the trend on the behavioral health. So I would say both items are performing at expectations. And that's super relevant because if you think about our range that we provided of losing 1% to 1.7%, that assumed a range of outcomes on a continuum of both of those. The fact that both of those are at expectations really pushes us to the low end of that range, which is why, again, we feel this will be a trough year on Medicaid margins and then moving back to breakeven or profitability going into next year.
Stephen Baxter
attendeeJust because we're dealing with negative percentages here, tracking closer to the 1.1% or tracking closer to the 1.7%?
Wayne DeVeydt
executive1.1%. So the 1.0%.
Stephen Baxter
attendeeGot it. Okay. And then as you think about 2027, obviously, you've been confident a number of times that this does represent a trough year for margins. As you think about the positives going into next year for Medicaid, which would be rate catch-up and the things that you're working on in terms of cost of care initiatives, but also the negatives like things like potential incremental acuity pressure and potential for trend to be continued to be under forecasted. I guess how are you thinking about the net of those things to get to that level of confidence on the trough margin?
Wayne DeVeydt
executiveSo there's a combination of things. I think clearly, the OB3 work requirements and how those will impact states, there's a lot of uncertainty, which lends itself to a very fair question, which is why do you get some degree of confidence. That being said, we have been able to work with states not just on the rate increases needed, but really spend a lot more time on the education about how the risk pools are being impacted. And states have been very open to understanding those risk pool impacts and have been very open to a lot of benefit design changes. And the more that we can work with them on even specific design changes, we know where the pressure points are when it comes to trend. And so there's clearly -- there's utilization, but there's also benefit design that can impact those pressure points. And so we've had a lot of good dialogue, I would say, good contractual understanding around what needs to happen. And a lot of those benefit changes are happening. And we're going into the new year knowing that the states have agreed to some of these changes. And then couple that with, in many cases, where we didn't get the full rate relief that we needed within a state, but there's an understanding that if the trends were to persist that, that rate relief would then be trued up as we got into the new year. So I do think that, that's an important item. And our state partners are generally all very good partners. They do want to get to the right answer, and they understand the importance of sustainability of the programs. And the last thing they want is volatility of individuals pulling in and out of markets. But unfortunately, it is something that we have to do occasionally as do our peers.
Stephen Baxter
attendeeOkay. And then I know, obviously, costs are a big focus across the entire company. But as you think about the components of generating better Medicaid margin in 2027, I guess how do you think about kind of what you need to happen on the MLR line versus what you can drive purely through G&A?
Wayne DeVeydt
executiveSo you always plan for the worst and then you try to execute to a better outcome. So we do believe we should be able to positively impact the MLR in and of itself next year. And we've seen some of that -- some of our own activities this year are having positive momentum on that. That being said, you should assume that the state budget pressures are going to persist and you should prepare by taking out the necessary G&A cost to support the programs that are there. So we have a multiyear program. It started this year. We're not talking about hundreds of millions. We're talking about billions that we plan to take out of the system. And we're in a very unique world where AI becomes an incredibly positive catalyst to remove a lot of administrative inefficiencies and really provide for those initiatives to either, one, serve as a safeguard against margins; or two, provide more flexibility in how we drive top line growth over time. So I don't know, Ben, you're leading kind of the broad Optum initiatives around G&A. Anything you would want to share around the momentum and where we're at and kind of how we're viewing it?
Benjamin Eklo
executiveYes. Yes. As Wayne said, we're on a multiyear journey to really get after what the cost structure of this organization looks like and modernize it, technology-enabled, AI-enabled kind of future infrastructure of Optum. And so we're working through things like call and claim where we can automate and eliminate back office and positions that don't create the best experience for our consumers. We're looking at automating approvals, clinical documentation, leveraging technology in the places where there's just a lot of time and energy, manual energy that's being used. And so we're digging in there. We're using it in many of our OptumHealth workflows in our clinics, ambient listening, getting -- freeing up time for recording and documentation for our physicians so that they have the opportunity to spend more time with patients doing the things that they enjoy. So working through many different angles in our OptumInsight space, some of our legacy programs there on payment integrity, risk and quality, RCM, looking into ways that we can more tech-enable those businesses to automate and find those efficiencies. And then really partnering across the organization in many of our corporate functions. So finance and accounting, marketing, communications, HR, finding different ways for many of those functions for us to use technology to largely automate a lot of the work that gets done today. And some of the momentum we have early on in some of our legal and HR and marketing functions and then kind of a fast follow-up. Wayne and I, in partnership with some of our other folks are pushing to get finance to kind of a fully automated function by the end of next year. So we're working across the organization in many instances to try and find those opportunities where we can take cost out, make it more efficient, make it a better experience and let us operate kind of how we believe we should in the future.
Stephen Baxter
attendeeOkay. Great. And then a couple of commercial questions, and then maybe we'll switch over to Optum after that. Obviously, IDR was one of the issues that came up with the second quarter. And I think you provided some framing that it's added like 100 basis points of cost. And I think that's off of a base of maybe 50 basis points in 2025. So I think on one hand, like obviously, this is a clear problem for the system that needs to get addressed at some point, but it doesn't seem obvious that it's truly incremental to what the cost trend was if it's 50 basis points in the base and 50 basis points incremental this year. So maybe just as you could step back a little bit and help us understand maybe a better framing for that and how to think about why IDR is holding up commercial margin improvement this year?
Wayne DeVeydt
executiveYes. So 2 things to anchor on. First and foremost, we held serve on our margins year-over-year, but our goal was to actually expand our margins coming into this year, into '26, and that did not happen. And again, the IDR was roughly 1 point on it. But it's also fair to say that the broader risk pools are changing, at least versus our expectations and our assumptions. And that was part of it. And as we continue to see more individuals move to self-insured, as we continue to see the residual impact of all the legislative changes, whether it be what OB3 did or individuals coming off the Medicaid ranks and moving into the exchanges, it's having a very difficult to predict effect on the broader commercial market. Again, that being said, we held serve on margins this year, but our expectations for growth did not come to light. We are performing better than expected, though, on the public exchanges. But as a reminder, we are refunding and rebating back this year as a commitment we made to Congress that we understand the affordability issues that are impacting the markets. And so we said for this year, we would refund those. Had you included those, I think we would be more balanced around the impact on commercial. But by pulling that out, you look at it as more of that like true small group, large group market that we're seeing that pressure, but not as much on the public exchange side.
Stephen Baxter
attendeeOkay. Yes. And then maybe just kind of take us through how you're going to deal with this and the pace of recovery that might now be expected in the current environment. And I guess, specifically, I guess, how you're thinking about just the core cost trend, the IDR pressure incrementally and potential for continued maybe degradation of the risk pool.
Wayne DeVeydt
executiveYes. So the one benefit with commercial is you have chances to reprice the book throughout the year. And so we've already started many of those initiatives in Q2, Q3 and as we move into Q4. And then you'll still have a relatively decent renewal cycle in January. But that process of pricing for where we think trend is going to be kind of where the puck is going to be, has already started. The one thing I would emphasize though, is IDR we're pricing for what we're seeing out there, but that's going to require a change from Congress around what's happening. And so separate from that is we are putting a lot of sunlight on the IDR process. It's the greatest disinfectant is sunlight. And the idea is let's shine a lot more light on this. This is not a rampant industry item where every provider is doing this, right? This is a handful of individual companies, roughly 5 that make up 60% of all the IDR, right? It is a mechanism that they figured out an opportunity to take advantage of a legislative loophole that was not created for the purposes that's being utilized. And so we're sharing that data with Congress, and we want Congress to understand what these companies are doing and why we think there should be a legislative solution. So -- but in the interim, until that happens, we have to price for it. And that unfortunately puts more pressure on affordability for the consumer.
Stephen Baxter
attendeeAnd you mentioned that, obviously, you're not recording the exchange profitability this year, but it's running better than expected. Maybe characterize what you've seen so far in the exchanges relative to the initial expectations that you had. And then maybe speak for a minute just about how you're approaching next year in terms of your pricing strategy and maybe expectation around like what the book size could potentially look like?
Wayne DeVeydt
executiveYes. I would say the membership was much more durable than I think we would have anticipated with the initial increases that were put forward on the public exchanges. And so from that perspective, we found not only a greater degree of stickiness within our membership base, but the underlying medical trends were very much aligned with our pricing, meaning that we were able to expand profit margins. Remember, though, this is a low single-digit margin business, right? So we're not talking about 1 moving to 5. You're talking about moving 1 point, 1.5 points. But I do think this is a particular business that over time is going to have to trend to that level of profitability, right? This is a government-supported program as you think about Medicaid being a 2% margin business over time, you think about Medicare being 2% to 4% margin business. Similarly, I think you think of public exchanges this way. And so I would say both the stickiness, durability, but also the underlying trends seem to perform well, especially with all the unknowns that were happening with those that were being disenrolled.
Stephen Baxter
attendeeOkay. Great. Maybe this is a good time then to kind of switch over to the Optum discussion. I guess, first, just kind of address this off the top. There's a news article last night discussing sale of some assets like value-based care assets in Florida to private equity. I think this is something the company has alluded to previously. Could you just help us think about strategic rationale and what makes this the right decision and what it means or doesn't mean for the rest of the portfolio?
Wayne DeVeydt
executiveYes, I'll let Krista comment. I'll start by just indicating that it's really old news. We've had this partnership since 2011. And it's an opportunity for us to really accelerate investments in different markets, but maybe talk a little bit about what we're doing there.
Krista Nelson
executiveYes. I would just point to 2 things. First, like Wayne mentioned, in addition to having a partner for a long time, we've also talked quite a bit about some of the restructuring in the fourth quarter that we intended to do this year, and that was one of those transactions. And second, on the strategic side, we're not exiting Florida. In fact, this is actually an opportunity to make the right investments and be well positioned for growth with a partner where we still have ownership and we still have incentive to ensure that we can kind of position that market for growth in the future. And so I think strategically that this is planned. We -- obviously, we're making a number of those same strategic investments in a handful of other markets. And so Florida was an opportunity where we had a partner, and it was a great way to ensure we're making the right investment.
Stephen Baxter
attendeeGreat. And then obviously, the OptumHealth outperformance in the first half has been pretty notable. I guess how much of this would you characterize as coming just kind of directly transferable through improved MA underwriting and outperformance there versus other actions that you've taken? And I guess, how do we think about the second half in terms of opportunities for outperformance and maybe also opportunities for reinvestment, too?
Krista Nelson
executiveYes. First, I would just say, really pleased with the execution and the outcomes that we're seeing in the first half of the year. And second, really just the pacing of the work of the turnaround. Really pleased with the progress. The vast majority of our outperformance is truly driven by clinical management and operating execution. We talk a lot about clinical excellence and operating excellence inside this business. I've given some examples of things that -- programs that we've launched that we can directly tie back to the outperformance. And so again, that's why we feel confident saying the vast majority of the actions that we've taken to improve, whether that's transitions of care, clinical management, care coordination, support for our patients. We're seeing it in inpatient. We're seeing it in lower readmissions. We're seeing it in lower SNF admissions, length of stay. All of our clinical metrics are really performing better than we expected. So it's kind of a first bucket driving it. Second, on the operating side, 2 things, really, operating cost management has been a really big theme for OptumHealth this year. I would say, driving significantly more cost savings in the business than we've done in the past. That's going to be a theme that continues in the second half of the year and also into next year and years beyond. But then truly just operating performance, things like physician productivity, scheduling, how we're creating more access in the system. We've talked about expanding patient-facing hours by over 12% or 200,000 hours in the first half of the year. Those operating initiatives are driving better performance in the business. And again, we will continue. All of those efforts are going to be a significant contributor to second half of the year, but also going to contribute to margin expansion inside '27 and again, inside 2028 for this business. So again, pleased with the performance pacing ahead of schedule, and we're going to continue to focus on those elements because those also will help us drive investment in the business in the second half of the year.
Stephen Baxter
attendeeOkay. And then as we think about the key levers that we need to believe in terms of you to drive up margins to targeted levels, it sounds like, hopefully, by 2028, still the right way to think about it. I guess what are the key levers there? Another question would be where does some of the recontracting efforts with external payers stand? And any kind of broad thoughts about when this part of the business might be able to return to more of the top line growth we've seen historically?
Krista Nelson
executiveYes. So first, I'll just start out with some of the payer work. We spent the first half of the year, like I mentioned, working with all of our payers to make sure we're positioned, managing the loss contracts that we've talked about. I would say, really pleased with the progress there, where the vast majority of all of our addressable contracts for '27 have been addressed and/or mitigated. So feeling really good about now we're heading into the planning cycle, right, getting ready for open enrollment and kind of getting ready for 2027. You asked about some of the levers. So we still had some work to do around some of our benefit construct, around some of our rates, around even just some of the contract dynamics, what we're taking risk for, what we're not. And so I would say that's been addressed in some of that contracting, but that is going to be a contributing lever to 2027 as you think about maybe some additional PPO reductions as an example that will help improve performance for 2027. Another lever for 2027 in addition to what I mentioned around clinical and operating excellence is just how we take our performance standards that we drive inside our employed practices out to our network. OptumHealth was really on a kind of a growth trajectory in the past few years. And I wouldn't -- I would say there was an opportunity around just network performance management. What are the tools we're bringing to our network, how are we performance managing, how we're making sure quality, we're managing costs, but we're managing affordability inside our network. And those are things that are going to expand inside '27 to drive continued performance improvement. So again, as I think about '27 and '28, it's that core performance. There's new strategic initiatives that we'll be launching to ensure that we're driving affordability in the system, that we're improving quality, that we're in a position to expand margin by points inside '27. And then that momentum continues inside '28. Top line growth is probably not going to be the focus next year. Really, we're talking about earnings growth kind of pacing appropriately towards our 6% to 8% margin target. But 2027 is also positioning us really well for growth inside '28.
Stephen Baxter
attendeeOkay. Great. And then last year, as part of the kind of the broader update on the subcomponents of OptumHealth, the company noted that the fee-for-service primary care and multi-specialty practices were losing, I think, hundreds of millions of dollars. I guess, first, has there been much change in kind of the operations and performance there? And what is assumed in those businesses as part of the financial targets going forward?
Krista Nelson
executiveYes. Yes. So fee-for-service was an opportunity for us. I think maybe we were very focused on appropriately performing in value-based care. And I would say maybe took some of the focus away from fee-for-service. But like I've mentioned before, fee-for-service is actually a core contributor to our value-based care agenda, our integrated value-based care system. All of our fee-for-service businesses are a lower total cost of care setting. They still focus on quality. You still get the benefit of a value-based care model even when the payment model is fee-for-service. But we did have to do some things to really make sure that we are driving fee-for-service performance improvement, whether that's physician compensation, some of the scheduling enhancements I talked about, making sure we're improving access for our patients, whether it's some of our net collections and RCM improvement, coding accuracy, things like that. I would say we're making really good progress on that this year, cost management being another lever as well, but still more work to do as I think about our fee-for-service turnaround, kind of pacing along the same lines as the value-based care turnaround, maybe getting there a little bit faster in fee-for-service just because it's a little bit easier to pull some of those levers around basic blocking and tackling, but still more work and more opportunity as I think about heading into next year. In terms of just expectation setting, I would say all of our fee-for-service businesses are performing in line with our expectations. And in fact, maybe, I would say, slightly favorable in some cases where we're seeing really good year-over-year growth, really good mix and acuity inside those practices.
Stephen Baxter
attendeeOkay. Great. And then maybe to ask on OptumInsight, maybe one for Ben. I guess as you think about reformatting, I guess, maybe some of the products to be truly relevant in the AI era that we're in, I guess what are the key milestones there? And I guess as you think about the financial profile of this business over time, like it seems like ability to impact cost structure might be among the highest of any of the businesses with inside the company. I guess how do you think about how maybe the margin profile of this business could evolve over the next several years?
Benjamin Eklo
executiveYes. Yes. So maybe on the second part of your question first. Today, we're at an 18% -- kind of an 18% to 22% margin range in OptumInsight. The business is performing in line with our expectations this year, and we expect that we'll finish the year closer to the top end of that range in 2026. Importantly, inside of '26, it continues to be an investment and innovation year for OptumInsight. And so we are -- as we're modernizing some of these solutions that OptumInsight has had a long-standing place in the market with for majority of providers, majority of payers. At the same time, we're innovating on what the future of those products look like. So to your question on what are those key milestones, we are in the process of building, developing and selling a lot of these new products. And so kind of the runway to get to those sales at times can be long because there's just so much change in the marketplace right now and so many different products and opportunities, and so we're working to get those kind of core tenets to these new models and these new products that we sell. And we have a handful of those, and we're seeing good progress in the marketplace. But in many of those instances, the sales cycle does take a little more time. But I think as you see us land some of these, then they rapidly get deployed in the marketplace. And so I think those are the milestones you'll see as you may have a product like Optum Real or Crimson or Optum AI, where you've heard of it, but there's not -- those are the things that are gaining momentum right now. And I think you're going to start to hear a lot more about those as we pace into 2027 and in the future years. And at the same time, we're innovating, and I'm sure there will be products that we're in the process of developing right now. The good news is we have a very good partner in UnitedHealthcare that we are working closely with on a lot of these products. And in most cases, they are using them, deploying them before we even bring them to market. So we have an opportunity to test quickly and kind of learn and fail if we need to, to get those to market.
Stephen Baxter
attendeeOkay. Great. Maybe just the last question then on capital deployment. And as the company is increasingly able to deploy capital again over the next couple of years, I guess what should we think about as the key priorities and maybe how to contrast that against the capital deployment profile of the company that we've all kind of seen over the past 15, 20 years?
Wayne DeVeydt
executiveYes. I think you'll see a similar approach to our historical deployment of capital. I think you should anticipate -- our first goal was to get our debt to cap much closer to the 40% range. If you go back to last year, at this time, we were closer to 45%. We should be tapping on 40% by Q4 of this year. So we've been aggressively paying down our debt and growing our earnings, which has helped with the debt to cap. That being said, that now allows us the flexibility to get back into the market in a much more aggressive way. When we started this year, we had anticipated deploying about $2.5 billion of capital for buybacks. We've now said we'll do at least $5 billion this year. And that's relevant because we're doing that while achieving our debt-to-cap goals. We did recently raise our dividend. So as you think about the next 5 years, in my mind, we're going to have a balanced return of capital approach again. We would expect to continue to raise our dividend. We would expect to deploy buyback at a much more aggressive pace. And we would expect to be reengaged in the acquisition space as we have historically been, albeit a lot more focused on what we think are the big growth drivers over time. We think value-based care is a massive opportunity for us, and we think these OptumInsight innovations are a massive one. And that's where our capital will be pursued.
Stephen Baxter
attendeeOkay. Well, fantastic. I think that's all we have time for. So thank you so much for being here.
Wayne DeVeydt
executiveGreat. Thanks.
Benjamin Eklo
executiveThank you.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete UnitedHealth Group Incorporated transcript — plus 256,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to UnitedHealth Group Incorporated earnings transcripts and 256,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.
More tools for stock research
OptionsBell: an unusual options activity scanner that tracks options flow across all US stocks and emails you when large trades appear in UnitedHealth Group Incorporated or any ticker on your watchlist.
StockMarketScan: a stock screener with alerts: 24 pre-built screens refreshed every 5 minutes, watchlists and email notifications. Both offer API and MCP access and fair monthly pricing.