Universal Display Corporation (OLED) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 15, 2020

NASDAQ US Information Technology Semiconductors and Semiconductor Equipment conference_presentation 35 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Sidney Ho

analyst
#1

Good morning, everyone. Welcome to the second day of Deutsche Bank Tech Conference. I'm Sidney Ho. I cover semiconductors and semi cap equipment at DB. Next up, we have Universal Display. Universal Display is a pure-play in the OLED display industry. They sell the raw materials in each OLED screen, and they also collect licensing revenue. Today, we're very pleased to have Universal Display's CFO, Sid Rosenblatt, with us. Welcome, Sid.

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#2

Thank you very much, Sid.

Sidney Ho

analyst
#3

[Operator Instructions] I will try to ask those questions as we go through our discussions.

Sidney Ho

analyst
#4

So with that out of the way, let me start off with a few questions that I ask every company at the conference. There's a little technical difficulty. Well, here go. So starting with Huawei, with the new rules that were just announced by the Department of Commerce a month ago, I know you don't really sell directly to Huawei. But what is the potential indirect impact to Universal Display and do you think down the road, other OEMs can make up the shortfall from Huawei? Or maybe how quickly do you think that, that could happen?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#5

Well, thank you, number one, for inviting me. And the Huawei issue is one that is -- it's very fluid, to be perfectly honest. As you said, we're not a direct supplier to Huawei. However, our customers are. And if there is a complete ban that Huawei is not able to get product and not able to make smartphones, which is what they use our OLED screens for then there clearly will be a void, and the question is how quickly will other OEMs make up for that. And so whether it's Vivo or Oppo in China or whether it's Samsung or LG or others, I mean I think the overall demand is there. And the question is will there'll be some delays because they could get the product that they really want as opposed to saying, I just need a phone. So it may have an impact, and it may have a small impact. We just don't know to be perfectly honest at this time.

Sidney Ho

analyst
#6

Okay. That's fair. Now maybe switching gears over to the customer inventory. In the past, you talked about some customers in China buying some safety stocks ahead of some potential trade issues. But there were also customers buying ahead because of potential COVID supply chain disruptions. Can you give us an update on where things stand with customer inventory levels today? And do you think customers will continue to carry a higher level of inventory from here?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#7

Yes. The first issue, you are correct that at the end of last year, we had a issue that our customer in China was a supplier to Huawei. And when the trade issues first started, they contacted us and wanted to have a safety stock, which we shipped to them with a right to return it in the first quarter in case they didn't need it if the trade issues really did not materialize. They purchased that material in the first quarter in March. So it became revenue for us in March. In early March, we also contacted all of our customers because of some of the trade-related issues, and we were concerned about the supply chain going to our customers. And we asked them if they wanted to buy some safety stock so that if there were some disruptions in the supply chain that they would be able not let their factories run out of material since our phosphorescent emitters are the key, and we are a sole source. And we had a number of customers who did pretty much across the board, which is approximately $20 million worth of material that they purchased. If we recall when this offer started, we were all concerned about shipping materials or shipping products. Folks were not opening packages from Amazon at their home, customs officials were saying they're going to quarantine packages. And there was a number of issues that really made us concerned, and that's why we contacted our customers. It ended up that those issues really did not materialize. They did for a while, but now packages go, there's no quarantine of packages. So in terms of what we saw, we believe that our customers -- and we do talk to our customers, obviously, about inventory levels and what they need. And we get estimates of how much they're going to purchase at any given time. However, for any quarter or any month, but they're not guaranteed amounts. I do believe that if I was a manufacturer, I probably would keep more material on hand today than I would under normal circumstances just because there are uncertainties whether or not they're COVID-19 uncertainties, whether they're second waves or whether employees can't come to work. Whatever the issue is or things happened here, I think everybody on the inventory side is probably going to be conservative and make sure they have enough. So...

Sidney Ho

analyst
#8

That makes sense. Absolutely. Well, you touched upon a little bit, but the next question is more on the supply chain, COVID-related impact of the supply chain. We'll talk about demand shortly. But from a supply chain standpoint, has everything returned to normal levels, both for your own supply chain and your customer supply chain?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#9

Well, as far as we know for our commercial customers, our commercial supply chain, things are fairly normal. There's always some little glitches and hitches that occur. But overall, we've never missed a shipment during this entire time to our customers. As far as we know, our customers are getting the other products that they need. I haven't heard any of the customers or any announcements -- and our customers are large customers, obviously, at Samsung, LG, BOE, Tianma and others that talk about real disruptions in their supply chain, their disruptions were in getting their factory utilization up. And then as you said, your next question is going to related to demand. So I think that is there's been no real issues that we have seen on our side.

Sidney Ho

analyst
#10

Okay. One more before we get into the demand. If you look at the cost associated with managing COVID. I know you're fabless, it probably doesn't apply to you, but are there any additional costs that you're incurring right now, whether it's logistics or maybe social distancing that you expect to come out from your financials in the next few quarters?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#11

No, there's nothing material. I mean, we are fabless. We have -- our folks are going in who are part of the group that actually ships material, we've shipped material every day, during COVID-19. Our chemists and our lab workers are back into the labs and have been. We have some incremental costs. We've set up nursing stations so that every employee who comes in, gets questions, get their temperature taken. We've set up multiple shifts so that there is no contamination from one shift to the other. The building has cleared out. We do decontaminate the entire building, which is our -- our only building right now and Ewing as we're holding out some others. So that's the only incremental cost, which is immaterial, to be perfectly honest.

Sidney Ho

analyst
#12

Okay. That's fair. Now switching gears over to the demand side. Customer demand for high-end smartphones and TVs were pretty weak in the first half of the year, totally understandable. But in the last earnings call, you talked about a pickup in demand across your customers since the end of the second quarter. Can you talk a little bit about the current demand environment? And what areas are you seeing the most pickup in demand?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#13

Well, we're seeing it across the board to be perfectly honest. All of our customers, as we said on our earnings call, we saw a significant increase in material sales during July. And the first few days in August before our call. And pretty much was sharp and large in that April, May and June were just bad. All 3 months consistently. There was nothing positive in any of those 3 months that occurred in that. You didn't see any light at the end of the tunnel at any point until July. And I think we've heard from our customers, and you've heard from their conference calls that their factory utilization in July went up and there's demand, there's new products that are going to be introduced in the second half of the year. And we saw that, and we have seen nothing that changes that as of this time.

Sidney Ho

analyst
#14

Okay. That's good news. So if you look at your full year guidance, obviously, you did not reinstate the full year guidance in the second quarter earnings call. I know your lead times are generally very short. But can you give us a little context on the typical visibility that you have with customers? At this time of the year, in normal time periods versus what you are seeing today? Is it similar? Is it worse?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#15

It's probably all of the above, to some extent, in that we do get -- we have folks who are with our customers all the time. They're always asking what they need, what inventory levels they have, when orders will be placed. But there are no guaranteed orders. We'll ask them what they need in 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, because if we do have to make sure that we make the material so that if there is a spike in demand, we know about it in advance because some of our materials take 3 to 6 months for us to make in terms of our supply chain of getting all the raw materials. So -- and we've been building up raw material inventory just in case there were any disruption. So there's really not been a major difference. The thing that I do believe that the customers more than likely are building to orders as opposed to building inventory because I don't think any of the customers want to have any excess finished goods. So I think their factories now are reacting faster than they may have in the past to orders being placed or orders not being placed. And they're managing the whole -- their whole supply chain, I think, much tighter than they ever have.

Sidney Ho

analyst
#16

Excellent. I might be just -- I may be answering my own question. But if I look at your second half of this year, it would seem like the setup is pretty good. You got certainly better than the first half, but probably better than second half of last year, too. And I can point to, in North American smartphone OEM likely having a big product cycle, your large panel customer ramping up a new facility in China and your Chinese customers should be also ramping production. What are your biggest concerns for the second half of this year?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#17

I'd say, our biggest concern for the second half is that it sustains its growth and that there's nothing that's really going to disrupt it. I agree with you. There are new products coming out. There are -- clearly, the factory utilization and the demand side has picked up. And the thing that we have to worry about is whether or not it will continue through the whole quarter. And that's through the quarter and then through the -- for the second half of the year. And that, as you said, we did not reiterate guidance because there are still so many uncertainties. And some of them went away when we first withdrew guidance, which was the supply side of ours. But there still is demand and making sure that things occur when we believe they will. Do I think that the second half will be better? Yes.

Sidney Ho

analyst
#18

Good. My next question, I'm going to weave into one of the questions just came in. Your last earnings call, you talked about your expectations that installed capacity to grow approximately -- the industry installed capacity to grow approximately 50% at the end of 2021 from the end of 2019 as measured in square meters. The question that came in is asking any -- is there any development with Chinese OLED panel OEMs, whether it's new plants opening or being planned that you can talk about? And the second part of the question is kind of the opposite side. We also heard from the equipment suppliers, suggesting capital spending on display equipment will be muted in 2021, for example, apply expects flat year-over-year for the fiscal year. How should we square those comments?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#19

Well, I think there's a couple of things. We do believe that the end of 2021 compared to the end of 2019, in square meters of glass or OLEDs should be approximately 50% increase. Are there things that may change that may cause things to shift a little bit by 3 months or so? More than likely, yes. But there still is new capacity coming on in China. BOE just opened up its third fab or broken ground on their fourth. You've got China Star, Tianma. You've got a number of others that are talking about building OLED fabs, and LG is going to add capacity in their Guangzhou facility. So we still see a pretty significant growth. Is it 50 -- approximately 50%? Is it going to be a 3-month slippage here or there? That always happens. And obviously, this is such an unusual year that it may be. But overall, I think we'd still see that.

Sidney Ho

analyst
#20

So in other words, you haven't seen any significant changes or delays in terms of building capacity from any of these large display makers?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#21

There's been nothing announced by any of the large display makers that would make us see that.

Sidney Ho

analyst
#22

Okay. Okay. Fair point. Moving on to a couple of future opportunities. And the first one is blue emitters. And I've learned not to ask about the timing of blue emitters because I don't know. But in your last earnings call, you did bring up the paper that was presented by Samsung display at SID display week. And for those who don't have access to the paper, can you talk about the importance of that paper? I ask that because some investors have pushed back on that paper because it seems like every year at that conference, company will make some sort of statement, some sort of announcement about the products. But so far, there hasn't been any commercial blue?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#23

That is correct. There is no commercial blue at this time. And you are welcome to ask about it since everybody does. And we have been using the same language on, I think, 10 conference calls in a row. And that we said we're making excellent progress. And progress for us is multi-phase in that as we said, you need the right color, the right efficiency, the right lifetime. Specifications change over time. They get -- sometimes they get more stringent, sometimes they get loosened a little bit. There's a lot of moving parts before you get something that's going to go into a product. We thought that it was important to announce or discuss the fact that the Samsung R&D team presented a paper at SID, talking about deep blue phosphorescent emitters. And they acknowledged at the end of the paper that they receive the phosphorescent emitters for their work from Universal Display. So a lot of folks ask us, why can't you tell us anything? So we felt that this was something that made a lot of sense for us to point folks to say, we get asked question, well, are your customers playing with the material? What do your customers think about it? And we've always said, we're not going to talk about it. Well, our customers talked about it. And in the paper, they don't give specific data. They give relative data to some base that they're using, which they don't disclose. What I can tell you about the paper is the paper says that there's a lot of progress, there's a lot of good data in this paper. Lifetime still needs to be improved before it goes to a commercial product. So that's -- and that's what we've been saying. But it is -- I think it's important that our customers are playing with our material, which is always some of the early leading indicators that you're getting closer and that they're looking at this and how they can integrate this into a product.

Sidney Ho

analyst
#24

Okay. That's fair. Another technology that you guys have been talking about for a number of years now is your Organic Vapor Jet Printing. And this summer unit is a formation of the OVJP Corporation. What are some of the advantage of having this as a fully-owned subsidiary, a separate entity call it. And how should we think about the commercialization of this technology in terms of timing. When this technology is commercialized, what is the most important thing to know about this technology? What would that technology enable?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#25

Well, as we have stated, we need to scale this technology up. We have a R&D chamber, it's a prototype chamber in our facility that make -- that has red, green and blue material, and we can make on a 6-inch substrate red, green and blue pixels that will give you 4K and 8K resolution for OLED TVs. So when we can do this in our facility, going from the 6-inch size substrate to a Gen 10.5 substrate is a major leap. And we formed OVJP Corp., which is all part of our plan is we hired Jeff Hawthorne, who used to be CEO of Photon Dynamics, and he has expertise in scaling up equipment. So the team that Jeff is going to bring in Silicon Valley is going to be a small group of folks who are going to specifically work on 2 things: the scale up issues going from 6-inch glass to Gen 10.5 not just related to OVJP, but just scale up issues of going to a large-scale production and working with customers and/or equipment companies. So that team will focus on those. That's what their charge is, and that's what we intend them to do. We will continue to do all of the R&D in our facility.

Sidney Ho

analyst
#26

In terms of timing, does that change the meaning of commercialization at all?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#27

I don't think so. I think you still -- we still are just in the early stages of the scale-up. They're just putting the team together right now. We've got 3 or 4 people that are there -- hired now, and then we'll get up to maybe 10 or 12 in over the next 6 to 9 months so that you have a core group that can work together to do this. But the timing that we've always talked about always intended to have something like this occur.

Sidney Ho

analyst
#28

Okay. Great. Well, maybe drilling into a little bit more -- well, before we move on to that, one of the questions that came in asked about, how do you monetize OVJP? Will you be building fabs and manufacturing for clients? Or will you be licensing that technology to other -- your customers or others?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#29

Well, the main goal of OVJP is to make OLED TVs, the technology of choice. Right now, OLED TV is a really, very small part of the market. And we believe that you need some innovative equipment design changes to go from 1% or 2% or 3% of the TV market to 50% of the TV market, to go from 3.3 million units last year to 50 million or 100 million units in 5 years or 10 years, whatever your time horizon is. For us, we look at it as TVs are a big part of our business. Obviously, you put a lot more of our materials on 1 TV screen than you do on a smartphone. So we really are working hard to get TVs to continue to grow because that will be the driver of our business, in the long term, it's TV growth. So we will make a lot more money by selling a lot more material. Will we make something off of the equipment? Yes. Right now, it is still too early to say what the economics of it. What's important for us is that this gets developed and gets put into the commercial market. So that the cost of OLED TVs can come down because it's a very efficient, high throughput process.

Sidney Ho

analyst
#30

Great. Well, we'll come back to TV in a little bit. The majority of your business today is still tied to smartphones. So we have started to see a wider adoption of OLED in even mid-tier phones and some of the low end phones. The overall adoption rate right now, I think it's somewhere around 30% to 35%. And some of the third-party companies are talking about eventually getting to 50%. Do you think that is a number that is too conservative based on the technology you've seen, based on the cost curve that OLED can come down? And is there any technological breakthrough in the horizon that could drive an acceleration in cost improvement?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#31

Well, a few things. I agree with you. I do think that it will continue to take market share. Right now, I think the normal TAM is 1.4 billion units. So to get to 50% of that, you're talking 800 million smartphones with OLED screens. And some of the analysts have that happening within 5 years. I think that new capacity, particularly, you have a number of manufacturers in China who are building new fabs. BOE, if you look BOEs 4 fabs, if you add up to total capacity for those 4 fabs, which are all made on plastic substrates, it will be equal to what Samsung's flexible substrate abilities are today. It's a significant increase in supply, in addition to the other manufacturers that are building OLED fabs. And historically, when the Chinese manufacturers enter the market, they want their main way of entering the market is price. So I think that the driver for OLEDs has always been the cost of the OLED display. So if you have new capacity, and the goal of the new entrants into the marketplace is to get market share, and the way they do it is by driving the price down, then I do think you will see a continued growth in the percentage of smartphones that have OLEDs mid-range and even low range.

Sidney Ho

analyst
#32

Okay. The -- just to level set, what is the incremental bill of materials for using OLED today for some of the OEMs? And is there a way to think about what kind of pricing the new capacity can -- the pricing pressure that new capacity can put on the existing producers?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#33

Well, I'm probably the wrong person. Our material is pennies per square inch. So we're not to driving cost in any OLED display. I believe the estimates today for an LCD, low end is $10, maybe up to $30. And then a glass-based OLED screen is maybe $30 to $50. And then for a high-end plastic-based OLED display depending on which bells and whistles could be anywhere from $55, maybe to $85. So it's still significantly more. However, the benefits of high-end OLED screen or power efficiency, lightweight, 180-degree viewing angle. So there are a lot of benefits. And particularly now with 5G, 5G is very power hungry. So what you're going to have to see is more technologies that are power efficient. And OLED screens are much more power-efficient than existing LCD technology. And mainly because of our phosphorescent emitters, which are very power efficient.

Sidney Ho

analyst
#34

So just to be clear, you sell by square inches for your materials. But if prices of OLED display comes down hypothetically by 50%, is there any impact on your revenue at all?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#35

Well, we have prices built into all of our contracts. All of our long-term contracts have pricing built into them. Customers have cumulative volume discounts. And so as we continue to grow and as we introduce new products, new materials, we drive the price down, and we pass those on to our customers. Do our customers always ask for pricing concessions? Yes. But overall, I don't believe that you're going to see -- if price comes down by 50%, we're not going to be selling our materials for 50% less. Do our customers always ask us for a couple of percentage points? We'll always do what we can to help the industry grow. We have been able to maintain our gross margin profile in the 70% to 75% range, which is our plan for the future.

Sidney Ho

analyst
#36

Okay. Great. One more question on smartphones. In terms of 5G, that is, everyone has their own forecast. I think this year is somewhere around 200 million, next year, maybe 450 million. How are you thinking about the opportunity for Universal Display with the ramp in 5G smartphone. Is that -- is the primary benefit just a bigger smartphone refresh cycle? Or will there be other benefits like maybe better battery lives that drive the adoption of OLED? Maybe asked differently, what kind of trends have you seen in the 5G phones that have launched so far? And do you think that is representative of what's going to happen as we -- as 5G continues around the next few years?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#37

Well, I think that 5G is probably one of the -- is probably more beneficial just for the OEMs because this is a real refresh cycle for them. Folks have historically been holding on to their phones a little longer than they may have because the new phones coming out with new bells and whistles, the bells and whistles haven't been that loud, to be perfectly honest. So having a 5G phone now gives you a much faster speed. For us, as I mentioned a little earlier, having an OLED screen in a 5G phone gives you a much longer battery life because the larger your display, the more battery it will use. And now that you're going to have 5G, you're going to use this device even more and more. And so it's screen is going to be on and your screen uses somewhere, I believe, around 70% to 80% of your battery life is used up by your screen. So having a very power-efficient screen on the device is very important. So having an OLED screen, I think, is almost going to be a given for any 5G phone.

Sidney Ho

analyst
#38

Got it. Maybe switching back over to TV. I think you can answer this question. But prices for OLED large display panels are still pretty high. Are there -- other than having technology advancements like OVJP, are there other ways for prices to come down? Is it just more competition? But there's certainly one maker that is actually really making a large display today?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#39

Yes. I think it is a -- obviously, more capacity, higher yields in the factories, any innovation that you can make to get your yields up. Having another competitor, I think, will drive it. Right now, as you said, LG is the only supplier of OLED panels. I think there's 19 OEMs that market OLED TVs. Prices have come down significantly. You can buy a 55-inch OLED TV today probably for $1,200 and the 65-inch under $2,000. And there's a 77-inch OLED TV at Costco that I saw for $3,200. So prices have come down significantly. And if you want the best TV out there, you're going to buy an OLED TV. It's been rated the best TV ever, every year. And if you're going to -- and they're priced today to compete in the high-end TV market. They're looking at the $400 TVs. That's not what they're trying to compete with. They are -- if you go in and you want to buy a TV for your family room or you want a media your room and you want the best TV out there, you're going to go buy an OLED TV. There are LCD TVs that cost as much as an OLED TV. They're very high end ones. So it isn't that we are -- OLED TVs are priced so much higher, historically they were. They're getting much more competitive. I do believe that you will see other OEMs start making OLED TVs. There's -- BOE has had a wide OLED TV pilot line or R&D line for years, and they've demonstrated OLED TV. So I still see competition and competition always drives the price down.

Sidney Ho

analyst
#40

Great. Maybe one more question on TV. I think in terms of technology, the smartphone side is pretty set. It seems like the OLED is the way to go, mostly -- most of the smartphone OEMs are going that route. But in TV, in the large screen, there are always headlines about alternative technologies, whether that's micro LED, whether there's quantum dots, what are your thoughts on these competing technologies? And has there been any noticeable change that you would call out in these technologies over the past year?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#41

No. I mean our competition for OLEDs is LCDS. I mean there's 80 LCD fabs in the world. There's 1 OLED TV fab in the world. So you still -- we still have to be better and cheaper than LCDs. You've got micro LEDs and you've got quantum dot -- there are quantum dot LCDs, which are LCDs that uses quantum dot color filters. They're also -- they're talking about QD-OLEDs, which are using blue organic OLED materials and use quantum dot materials to down convert to red and green. None of them are in the market as of today. So our competition, to be perfectly honest, is still all the LCDs that are out there.

Sidney Ho

analyst
#42

Okay. Maybe last question. Just going back -- going to the financial side. Looking at the use of cash, you continue to have a very good cash balance, about, what, $600 plus million on the balance sheet. It's good to see you raising dividends quite consistently, but how do you think about use of cash beyond organic investments going forward as you continue to generate pretty healthy positive free cash flow?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#43

Well, we've always stated that as a licensing company, you want to have a very strong balance sheet. And you don't want to have to sue somebody to ensure that they respect your IP but you also have to have the wherewithal to do it because you can't have an empty threat. And we've never sued anybody and we're not threatening to sue anybody and has nothing to do with it. It's just that you always want to have a very strong balance sheet. In addition, if there are opportunities because we bought IP in the past or if there's anything that comes up that we think in the future will be helpful for us or adjacent to what we're doing or expand our market, we want to be able to react. And the Board's philosophy, as you stated, is as we continue to grow, we believe that the right way to return capital to shareholders is through dividends.

Sidney Ho

analyst
#44

Okay. I think we are out of time, and thank you for your time today, Sid, and hopefully, have a productive rest of the day for our conference.

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#45

Thank you very much for inviting me, Sid.

Sidney Ho

analyst
#46

Take care.

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#47

Bye-bye.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Universal Display Corporation transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Universal Display Corporation earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.