USA TODAY Co., Inc. (TDAY) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
September 8, 2026
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Jason Bazinet
analystJust a high-level strategy question. Like you said -- I mean, at one level, like your strategy is very clear, but there were a lot of things that happened on that last earnings call where you were talking about serving machines and stuff like that. And so I thought maybe just to start us off, just a high-level simple strategy question. What is your firm's strategy? How has it evolved? Where are we now? And what might change?
Michael Reed
executiveYes. And trying to keep it simple and short, I think the way I would answer that is we are -- we have one of the biggest content creator forces in the country. We create content every day that's relevant to consumers. We're kind of in the news space, although we've branched out into entertainment, sports, games and things like that. But we have a national play and a local play, which makes us a bit unique compared to most media companies. But we're a content creator and what's really the underlying strategy is create content that's relevant and unique, valuable to consumers and to build an audience on our digital platform at scale. And that's really the underlying strategy. What is changing really rapidly that impacts Q2, both positively and negatively is the search landscape is changing dramatically from the old search to new AI search, and that's impacted where consumers when they're doing search, what platform they stay on versus moving across -- around the open web. And that impacts us more in a negative way than a positive way. But then on the other hand, AI is creating opportunities for us to take the data we have on consumers, make it into intelligence that we can then use to create a more personalized and engaging experience for consumers, which we think in the long run will lead to better revenue opportunities for all consumers on our platform. So for us, it's -- the strategy is still create content that's unique, but yet relevant, bring audience to the platform. leverage that data once they're on the platform, we get signals, turn that signal into intelligence, actionable intelligence and then have an opportunity to monetize that consumer on our platform. And our digital revenue strategy is across 5 really diversified revenue streams. We're not all in on any one. We're really focused on 5 that's digital subscription revenue, digital advertising revenue, e-commerce revenue, digital marketing services and then licensing and syndication of our content. And across those 5 categories, we're looking to be able to grow ARPU per consumer on the platform as well as expand overall margins of the business as we especially enter licensing deals. So definitely -- it's complicated, and we could go into a ton of detail, but that's the underlying strategy, grow audience at scale, leverage, take that data, make it into actionable intelligence through technology today that makes a more personalized experience for every consumer on our platform.
Jason Bazinet
analystOkay. And when you say the search ecosystem is evolving rapidly, that is something that transcends just the AI overview or whatever, right? This is just constant changes that are being made by Google all the time and then punctuated by this recent AI overview change or...
Michael Reed
executiveYes, correct.
Jason Bazinet
analystYes. Okay.
Michael Reed
executiveYes, correct. Deprioritizing search, removing things from search, Google plays a lot of games.
Jason Bazinet
analystRight. They just want to keep you in their walled garden.
Michael Reed
executiveThat's right.
Jason Bazinet
analystAll right. So Trisha, I have -- this is a question more for you. So I think the North Star for your stock is same-store revenues. That seems to be the thing that investors are most focused on. And the declines were like pretty sharp, almost 8% back in the first quarter of '25. And then almost every quarter, uninterrupted, it just got better and better and better and better until we got to, I'll call it, minus 1.8%, call it, minus 2% in the first quarter of '26. But then we sort of retrenched back down to minus 6% in the second quarter. And the stock sort of reacted to that, I think. And so my question is pretty simple. What happened in 2Q that caused this uninterrupted improvement to sort of get interrupted for 1 quarter? And do you think investors should take that as indicative of future growth? Or is that just a blip on a multi-quarter, multiyear improvement trajectory?
Trisha Gosser
executiveYes, I think that's a great question. And I think the strategy that Mike just outlined really leads us to what we said we would do this year, and that is meaningful improvement in our same-store revenue. And we've done that through the first half of the year. And we came into the year saying that there would be quarterly variability in our business. And I think it's really important to separate the quarterly variability that we alluded to when we came into the year signaling and the underlying fundamentals of the business, which we think are moving in the right direction and are what are going to give us that sustained improvement in same-store revenue. And I agree. I think that's the metric that investors look at the most and certainly what we look at. And so the AI content licensing business, which is growing, is still a very nascent business. There's a lot of quarterly variability in how that revenue is recognized. And we signaled that as we came into the year. It was particularly strong in Q1, not as strong in Q2, although it still had 20% year-over-year growth in the quarter. But when you look at the second quarter, you look at our digital-only subscription business, that grew nicely, a second consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth. We drove new highs in ARPU. Our content licensing business continued to grow again at double digits. Even in a quarter where the same-store revenue didn't show the same kind of improvement in the first quarter, we still grew free cash flow year-over-year. We posted a solid net income. So I think it shows that we're able to control all of the variables even as the top line has some variance quarter-to-quarter. But I also think that the second quarter is not indicative of where we think we'll be. Certainly the quarter where we started to see the most impact from search on our traffic. But we're doing quite a bit under -- in the foundation to bring that traffic to us in different sources. We expect that to improve in the second half of the year. So overall, a really strong first half of the year, and we think we'll continue to improve those trends as you've seen over the past several quarters.
Michael Reed
executiveJason, I would just add to that, as Trisha is saying, I think with a transformation like we're going through from a legacy print business to a digital business, there are 2 steps forward, one step back and there are fits and starts and then there are things changing in the technology world and in the search world, and they impact our business. And so one of the things we really talk to investors about a lot and we manage the business this way internally is on an annualized basis, are we continuing to make progress because there are going to be some fluctuations quarter-to-quarter. And sometimes the stock market quarter-to-quarter is more like a casino, and it's not really the right way to look at our business. And if you looked at the LTM, for example, at the end of the second quarter, while we had a step back from Q1 to Q2, our LTM at the end of Q2 was still improved from the year before. So I think the year before in Q2, our same-store was down 7%. So our LTM now with the down 6%, and it's a little bit better. So we are -- we really do encourage that kind of that long-term view of on an annual basis, are we continuing to make progress. And if you look back over the last 3 or 4 years, we continue to make progress on same-store sales towards that inflection point and then at the same time, expanding margins and growing free cash flow.
Jason Bazinet
analystThat inflection point, meaning flatter growth.
Michael Reed
executiveThat's correct. Yes.
Jason Bazinet
analystAll right. LTM. Trisha can you go back to one thing you said? What was it that grew 20% in the first quarter? Was that all digital? Or that was digital? What was it?
Trisha Gosser
executiveYes, digital other grew 20% year-over-year in the second quarter.
Jason Bazinet
analystOkay. In the second quarter. Now maybe it's very hard for me to unpack sort of digital other, but I sort of assume that the weakness that we saw in the second quarter was really just a function of smaller AI licensing revenue, but maybe that's not right. Maybe it's more around some of the search things that you were bringing up. Can we sort of -- is that -- is it sort of an AI issue or it's more digital advertising dollars related to the search changes or both?
Michael Reed
executiveYes. Well, I think if you're just simply comparing Q1 to Q2, down 2% versus down 6%, it is both. We had more licensing revenue in the first quarter that was tied to a specific set of content that somebody bought from us that didn't repeat in Q2. So that -- there was a difference there. And then we saw some changes in Google Search that impacted us more in Q2 than it had in previous quarters. And so there's a combination of those 2 things.
Jason Bazinet
analystOkay. That's great. And then on the AI side, can you just remind us, Mike, what AI deals you've done so far and which just by in terms of names. And then are there any left? Or should investors think of -- it's just about sort of getting more juice out of the lemons that where we already have contracts?
Michael Reed
executiveYes. No, there's more or less. So we've done deals so far with Meta, with Microsoft with Amazon. But -- so we will -- we do think we'll get more juice out of those lemons, those 3, but there are a lot more deals to do. There's just some of the names you could think of are Apple and Anthropic, OpenAI, Grok, whatever [indiscernible] is. And then there are the social media platforms that as each day goes by and you have so many hallucinations and fake content out there, our content being a trusted source of content, there's more -- that's being sought after more by the social media platforms who want trusted content on their platform. And so them licensing or paying us essentially think about it like a licensing fee to produce more of our content onto those platforms in addition to our own, which is part of our growth strategy anyways, but that opens up more paths for deals as well. So we do think there's 1 or 2 more deals to come this year. We did say that on the second quarter earnings call. So I think you'll see that in the next couple of months. But then there are more deals to do out there as well.
Jason Bazinet
analystOkay. And then when -- I think investors always struggle with these AI deals because it's like I think we sort of learned some of this is -- you've always said it's lumpy, but it's very hard for us, is it like fixed or variable or some combination of the 2. Without getting into the specifics, can you just qualitatively describe how these deals are typically struck?
Michael Reed
executiveYes. And I say lumpy partially because the -- there's a lot of reasons why it's lumpy, but partially because this ecosystem is so new and it's just evolving and our partners on the other side who have the AI business are really still trying to figure out their business model. And so compensating us for the content as they figure out their business model, I think, gets easier. And I still think there's a big disconnect between what we perceive our content is worth and what they perceive it's worth. And I think that dynamic continues to work in our favor each day because there's so much fake news out there and so much hallucination out there that trusted content is becoming more and more valuable. But as their business models evolve and as the desire to have trusted content evolves, I think that these deals will become less lumpy and they'll have a more -- it will be easier to understand how they work and to lay out how they work. Right now, there's -- every deal we've done has been really different. Some have been more pay on performance. Some have been we want to buy archived content. Some are we want to buy real-time content for the next 2 years. So each deal has been structured a little bit differently. And so that's why I think this ecosystem still has to evolve for the deals to become more consistent.
Jason Bazinet
analystOkay. That's super helpful. So outside of AI, I'm going to turn it back over to you, Trisha. The beyond AI and within other revenues, you've got a handful of these. So digital subscriptions, they grew year-over-year. But when I sort of look at the long-term numbers, like digital subscriptions, it's sort of flattish with like a lot of volatility, like the subs go up and then the subs go down and the ARPU is down and then the ARPU is up a lot. Like it's very hard to get a ton of modeling conviction as you're sitting there trying to go out and prognosticate the future, right? But you guys sound very optimistic about where digital subscriptions are going. So maybe just talk a little bit about both the past in terms of the quantity and the price moving up and down and then what we should expect going forward and why you're so optimistic about digital subscription.
Trisha Gosser
executiveYes, absolutely. So our digital subscription business has been growing this year year-over-year. You pointed that out in the second quarter, we saw good growth year-over-year. That's been driven off of our ARPU. So our ARPU continues to hit record highs, up over 30% year-over-year in Q2, consistently double-digit growth year-over-year. And we think we have continued headroom on our pricing. We think we can continue to improve ARPU. But what you've seen is that our volumes have been pretty stable to declining. And what we saw in the second quarter that has us really optimistic is the fact that we're starting to see the underlying metrics of our volumes give us the indication that we're at the point where volumes will start to return to growth. We've been incredibly disciplined in our pricing strategy over the past year. And that means we've let go of high churn, low lifetime value customers that brought in a lot of volume but didn't bring in a lot of revenue. We've taken that off of our platform. That's helped us increase our ARPU, but it's also given us a much more sustainable and predictable base of subscriptions and subscribers. And from that, we can model the future more predictably than we've been able to in the past. And so as you look at Q2 and you see things like our churn metrics are improving, our start-to-stop ratio is improving, our retention, our engagement is improving. And so long term, growth really does need to come from both levers. It needs to come from ARPU and it needs to come from volume. You're seeing that ARPU growth now. I think you'll see that continue. But I think you'll only see digital subscription revenue growth be more substantial as we bring back volume growth and ARPU growth.
Jason Bazinet
analystSo more stable going forward?
Trisha Gosser
executiveYes. We did a lot of work over the past year. It was painful to take those high churning, like I said, low lifetime value consumers off of our platform. They were difficult to model, but we've done the work so that we have quality subscriptions left in our portfolio.
Jason Bazinet
analystAnd when you guys say start to stop, that's just gross add as a start and someone that churns as a stop?
Trisha Gosser
executiveCorrect.
Jason Bazinet
analystOkay. And you're looking at that ratio and it's getting better and better -- that's great. So digital ads down, I think it was 9% in the second quarter. Does this just all circle back to the search changes? Or was there something else going on in the digital ad market beyond the search changes you alluded to?
Trisha Gosser
executiveYes. So there were 3 things that happened in the second quarter that each had about equal weight. So the second quarter was the first quarter where we really saw the change in consumer behavior, search behavior impacting our digital advertising revenue. We also saw one of our programmatic partners being removed from one of the platforms that we use. And then we did see a change in one of our vendors, a Google algorithm change, which impacted one of our vendors, which then flowed through sponsored links onto our platform. I would say all of those had about equal weight in the quarter. The thing that we're most excited about is that we have the ability to bring consumers onto our platforms in different ways. We've been intentionally stepping away from search for many quarters now. I think you've heard us talking for well over a year about lessening our reliance on Google Search as a funnel for traffic onto our platform. And the work that we've been doing, whether it's around social or newsletters are still a very valuable channel for us in acquiring customers. As those start to scale and stack up, we have the ability to change that digital revenue trend in the back half of the year. I think you also have heard us talk a lot about the work we're doing around technology, the signals on our platform, our known users. And as that grows across our platform, our advertising CPMs start to grow as well. So I don't think that the trend that we saw in the second quarter is indicative of where we'll be in the back half of the year.
Jason Bazinet
analystGreat Trisha thanks. So Mike, I'm going to shift it over to you. During the second quarter, you brought up Palantir for the first time. At least I've missed this if you mentioned it in prior calls. What are you doing with Palantir? What -- if you can sort of dumb it down to explain for a layman, what does that mean? How is it going to help?
Michael Reed
executiveThey have a software that they've written called Foundry over the last 20 years, and we're essentially renting that. So what we do and the simplest way to think about it is we take the data or the signals we get from consumers on our platform, and we have so much history of that. Not only do we create new signals every day, new data every day, but we've got history. So we have tons of data. And what we do is rent Palantir's software to turn those signals into actionable intelligence. That's really what we're doing. So with every single consumer on our platform, we can serve them a more personalized experience. These are the -- this is the content we need to serve that consumer. Here's the e-commerce link we need to embed into that content. Here's the subscription offer we should deliver at this time, at this price to that consumer. This is the type of advertising that will work with this consumer. And so it's essentially taking the data or all those signals we have in all the history, but also the new stuff we're creating and really turning it into actionable intelligence. For us to do that ourselves, it would take years to build the software, and they've done it. And so the data is ours, the output is ours. The last mile of delivery of that intelligence is on our platform. So it's really all of our stuff. We're renting their software and their future deployed engineers to help us. And so I'm really excited about the opportunity. And what might take us years to do, I think we can do in months with them.
Jason Bazinet
analystSo let's say that this succeeds, what ends up happening? We just see digital revenues get better as the advertising gets better.
Michael Reed
executiveExactly across all categories, commerce subscription and advertising, I think, across all 3. So I think you would look at -- instead of looking at just a number per subscriber, we look at a number per consumer on the platform because there's a lot of people that will never subscribe. So our overall revenue per consumer on the platform should grow meaningfully from $2 where it is today to a much larger number in the future.
Jason Bazinet
analystAnd that's $2 per DAU, -- is that what you're measuring or $2 per MAU or when you say a consumer on your platform?
Michael Reed
executiveYes, per year in revenue. If you say we have 100 million -- 150 million consumers on the platform every single month, we do $2 to $3 per year in revenue because I'm taking DMS revenue out. So you can't look at our total revenue, just revenue generated on the platform.
Jason Bazinet
analystFrom the consumers.
Michael Reed
executiveSo if we do $2 or $3 and we can get that to $6, it's a double of digital revenue. And so I'm really -- we're really excited. We just started. So we don't have enough information to really say this is the pace we think this should grow at. But we're hopeful in the next couple of quarters, we have enough real information to be able to say, here's how you model it, here's how you should think about it.
Jason Bazinet
analystHave you turned on all of these at the same time? Or is it like are you piloting one where it's like you're just focused on ads or just focused on sponsorship or something?
Michael Reed
executiveYes. We're actually just -- we're turning them on, but doing it in a couple of markets.
Jason Bazinet
analystOh, interesting. So all of them are on in a few markets.
Michael Reed
executiveYes, a couple of markets.
Jason Bazinet
analystSort of a beta test. Okay. When will you share with the Street how well that's going or not going?
Michael Reed
executiveNo. Our hope is that we're actually going to see revenue improvement in the fourth quarter from this test. So hopefully, by the time we get to the fourth quarter, we're talking about what we saw from an improvement standpoint from Palantir. That's great. So not that far off.
Jason Bazinet
analystThat's great.
Michael Reed
executiveSo not that far off.
Jason Bazinet
analystOkay. Have you shared how many markets you turned on?
Michael Reed
executiveI don't know if we have, but it's 2. Two breaking soon.
Jason Bazinet
analystAnd so the idea in these 2 test markets is just sort of get some learnings, lessons learned and then take those learnings and then expand.
Michael Reed
executiveRight.
Jason Bazinet
analystOkay. That's great. So Trisha, I'm going to go back to something that Mike sort of caught me off guard during the 2Q earnings when he started talking about we serve both machines and humans. I haven't heard any other publishers say this. So can you just talk a little bit about that? Because I -- not that I disagree with you, I've just never heard it expressed that way.
Trisha Gosser
executiveYes. The reality is that half of the traffic on the Internet now is machines. It is bots. And so we're aware that we have to serve both humans and machines with our content. The good news is you don't have to change the type of content that you're producing, and you don't have to approach your business from a content perspective differently for humans or for machines. What you do have to make sure you're doing is that your content is in a format that is beneficial for both machines and for humans. So we're leaning into things like subject matter expertise is going to be important. The speed that your site loads that is going to be important. content that is actionable. All of those are things that are important for our human readers, but that's also things that are important for our machine readers. So machines may get there first, but our ultimate goal is always going to be to reach that human reader. So what you have to do is you have to take the work that we've done to optimize your content for search engine optimization, right? That becomes a lot less important. You have to pivot now to make sure that your content and your format is optimized for answer engines or generative engines. And you also have to make sure that your experience, whether it's for humans or for machines, is in a format that's recognizable and repeatable. And that's the work that we're doing to make sure that we're providing that type of simple, easy to digest, recognizable content to machines. But interestingly enough, that's also what our human readers want, right? And so as we are working to lessen our reliance on search, creating that recognizable destination for human readers is also going to be important in our audience growth going forward. So it is interesting. We know that we -- our content is serving 2 different audiences, but it's really about the format that we have to be focused on and not changing the content that we're producing.
Jason Bazinet
analystI think everyone in the audience would agree that machine -- I don't know if people know it's half. I didn't know it's half of all traffic, but everyone agrees machines are out there to a greater extent. But how is that different than the AI licensing? I mean I thought we all thought that you were taking your corpus of information and then licensing this to AI and then AI would do something with it, which would be machine traffic and then the human would come in and do something and get the answer from the AI. What you're describing here is a totally separate initiative from the AI licensing revenue, right, where you're just taking your corpus of information and making it more accessible to a machine. That's why I get a little.
Trisha Gosser
executiveYes, I think there's an overlap there, right? So you need to create your content in a way that ultimately, AI licensing platforms that it's most effective for AI licensing platforms. And that is important. And we want to make sure that only we are blocking AI licensing platforms who are not -- don't have current licensing agreements with us. But once they do have licensing agreements with us, they process large amounts of data. It's important that your content and your data be in a structure that is helpful and efficient for them. But it's not just AI licensing platforms who -- and we have millions of every day, every month scrap trying to scrape content from our platform. And sometimes you want those bots to scrape content from your platform. We have advertisers who want to have bots scraping against our platform because it gives exposure to that advertiser and to their ads on our platform. And so making sure that when in simplistic terms, good bots have access to content or those that we have agreements with that it's in a format that is efficient for them.
Jason Bazinet
analystOkay. That's super helpful.
Michael Reed
executiveJason, I think what's really interesting about that is that you have -- it is a bigger -- it creates a bigger AI licensing opportunity, too, in terms of the pay-to-play models because we've learned a lot in our partnership with Microsoft. And part of that partnership is they've created a marketplace for all their other business companies to come and leverage AI in the marketplace. And so our content is in that marketplace. And we've learned what performs and what doesn't perform. And the human storytelling nature of our content we produce for humans doesn't work in the marketplace where it's mostly other businesses or other machines coming in to scrape that to utilize that content. So for us to create even more revenue on the AI licensing side, -- we need to have our -- the human content, human storytelling content reformatted into something that's all data and fact, not storytelling that then is consumed in a larger fashion in AI marketplaces. And so it's an interesting way to think about how we grow our AI licensing opportunity just by serving a different machine versus the human.
Jason Bazinet
analystSuper interesting. I'm going to shift to the Google litigation, if that's okay with you. So there's 2 cases, right? We've got the DOJ that has sued Google, and then you have a separate parallel lawsuit. And I just want to focus on the first one, the Google one. You've told us that the next step now that Google has been found to have a monopoly in the supply side and in the exchange that we're just waiting for the judge to hand down the remedies, right? My question is, is that when those remedies come out, if I was an investor and I knew that Google said they're already going to appeal this DOJ ruling, what do I do as a USA TODAY investor? It seemed to me if I know there's an appeal, there's not a major read across, but maybe I'm wrong.
Michael Reed
executiveWell, the remedies are -- Google has been found guilty of antitrust violations in the DOJ case. That's a fact. That's done. They found guilty. We filed summary judgment saying they've already been found guilty. So for our claims that are the same as the -- what the DOJ won, we shouldn't have to prove those. We should talk damages. And we won that summary judgment. So that's done. In the DOJ case, the remedies are what does Google have to do because they were found guilty. And that -- those remedies are about to come out. There's a memo. It's under lock and key for 14 days while there's redactions done, but we should know we did hear from our lawyers. It's 106 pages. And so we should know in the next couple of weeks.
Jason Bazinet
analystThat's a lot of remedies.
Michael Reed
executiveYes, it's -- but the remedies are behavioral, not break the company up. But we should know in the next couple of weeks what those are. And Google may want to appeal what the actual remedies are, but that doesn't have anything to do with the guilt of the case. Like they were found guilty of these infractions. And so that applies to our case as well. So the behavior, the remedies are just what does Google have to do as a result of being found guilty. Just like in our case, they've now been found guilty of these things. So in our case, it's okay, what's that mean damages-wise?
Jason Bazinet
analystOf course. So -- but my question is, if they're found guilty and Google has already said that they're going to appeal that finding, then aren't the remedies sort of at some level moot or I misunderstanding?
Trisha Gosser
executiveNo the remedies go into effect regardless of whether they appeal or not, Google would then have to apply to have the remedies stayed. And I'm not an attorney, but they would have to argue that it would be so detrimental to their business to have these in while they're appealing. So the assumption would be that the remedies are in place unless they get those remedies stayed, which would be a separate action from the appeal.
Jason Bazinet
analystOkay. So investors, whenever these remedies come out, investors can sort of take those to the bank. And I guess the most bearish interpretation is those remedies might be temporary if Google is challenging the guilty appeal in the first place, but they're going to go into effect. That's the point.
Trisha Gosser
executiveThat's my understanding.
Michael Reed
executiveUnless they can get a stay, which we think is highly unlikely.
Jason Bazinet
analystUnderstood. And then do you guys have a preference for behavioral or structural? I mean, I guess it was bad -- I don't know, you tell me. I mean, since we're not doing structural changes since they've already said that.
Michael Reed
executiveYes. The structural changes, in our view, would have taken a long time to put in place. To break that business up and sell it, you could be looking at 2 or 3 years. And so the behavioral stuff to us can be done essentially in a matter of a week or 2 or overnight. So to us, the behavioral is a better path because it's more instantaneous to our business.
Jason Bazinet
analystOkay. That's great. Anyone have any questions for the team at USA TODAY? All right. Well, this is great. Thank you so much for your time.
Michael Reed
executiveThanks, everyone.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete USA TODAY Co., Inc. transcript — plus 256,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to USA TODAY Co., Inc. earnings transcripts and 256,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.
More tools for stock research
OptionsBell: an unusual options activity scanner that tracks options flow across all US stocks and emails you when large trades appear in USA TODAY Co., Inc. or any ticker on your watchlist.
StockMarketScan: a stock screener with alerts: 24 pre-built screens refreshed every 5 minutes, watchlists and email notifications. Both offer API and MCP access and fair monthly pricing.