Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais S.A. ($USIM5)

Good morning. Welcome to the conference call of Usiminas in which the results of the first quarter of 2026 will be discussed. I'm Leonardo Karam, Investor Relations Officer at Usiminas. [Operator Instructions]. This conference call is being recorded and simultaneously broadcast on the Usiminas YouTube channel. We would like to remind you that this conference call is intended exclusively for investors and market analysts. We kindly ask you to identify yourself so that your question can be addressed. We also request that any questions from journalists be directed to the media relations team at Usiminas via e-mail, [email protected]. Before proceeding, I would like to clarify that any forward-looking statements that may be made during this conference call regarding the prospects of the company's business as well as projections, operational and financial goals related to its growth potential constitute forecasts based on management's expectations regarding the future of Usiminas. These expectations are highly dependent on the performance of the steel sector, the country's economic situation and the situation on international markets. So they are subject to change. With us here today is our President, Marcelo Chara, the Vice President of Finance, Investor Relations, Diego Garcia; and our Commercial Vice President, Miguel Homes. First, Marcelo will make a few initial remarks, then Diego will present the results. Afterwards, the questions asked in the Q&A session will be answered. Now I give the floor to Marcelo. Please, Marcelo.

Thank you, Leonardo. Ladies and gentlemen, good morning, everyone. It's a pleasure to be here with you to share the results of the first quarter of 2026. We started the year with an improvement in the results of our company, recording a consolidated EBITDA of BRL 653 million that accounts for a growth of 56% in relation to the previous quarter. As to steel sector, there was an increase of 5% in the net per ton, especially as a result of the better mix of sales, the better share in the automotive sector and a reduction of the COGS. And this was driven by the appreciation of the real and the higher efficiency in our industrial activities. In mining, we had a reduction as a result of the rainy season in the region that impacted the production and the logistics. And also due to the prioritization of mining activities with better performance. Considering the present moment, we see a challenging scenario for the next quarters, especially due to the adverse effect of the Iran war at the global economy. And this is due to the expressive increase in the natural gas and oil prices, higher inflation and lower speed in the drop of interest rates and also the maritime aspects that have been impacted. In spite of this complex scenario, we have expectation of consolidated results relatively stable. In steel sector, volumes of sales should remain at the same levels maintaining the segment in the automotive due to the high level of imports. The increase of cost, especially of energy and logistic inputs should be accompanied by the increase in the net revenue per ton. We expect sales volumes to be recovered and also considering the freight prices and fuel prices. There are positive measures that were imposed by the government with antidumping duties related to coated steel, and this should strike a balance in the future. Considering the perspective of the changes, importers responded internalizing an expressive volume of steel in February and March that increased the inventory levels of imported materials in the Brazilian market. In addition to the measures that have been implemented, there is an investment of in China, and we believe that we are going to close them in July 2027. It's important to mention that there's a risk of the oversupply at the structural level with an increase of imports of steel from Asia and China and with an increase of 78% when compared to the first quarter of 2025, especially from South Korea and Vietnam. In addition to Egypt, Internally, we continue with our focus and safety and a continuous improvement in our environmental performance in our operations, increasing competitiveness so as to reduce costs and also have a higher industrial efficiency and basically with a strong financial discipline. In relation to investments, we continue executing priority projects of the company, such as the PCI plant who is to complete it in the second quarter -- second half of 2026. But the benefits have already been captured in the first half of 2026 and also the retrofitting of the coke [ oven ] and also all the activities on the way. We would like to thank all our employees for their efforts, for the engagement as well as the suppliers, clients and shareholders and the community at large for the confidence and for the solid relationship we have been building along those years. Thank you very much. And I turn the floor to our CFO, Diego.

Thank you, Marcelo. Good morning, everyone. And before beginning the presentation of the results, I would like to remind you that these are the first results that were converted in reals from dollars. Let's move on to the highlights. Steel sales were decreased by 7% in relation to the fourth quarter '25. And this is a result of the strategy of giving more importance to the most effective activities. So there was a lower production due to the stronger rain during the period. EBITDA shows a significant moment in relation to the previous quarter. This was driven by a better mix of products in the steel sector and higher profitability that more than offset the drop in volumes. This improvement in the mix is reflected in an improvement of nearly 5% of the revenue per ton in the steel sector as the increase more than offset the drop in the mining activities. The cost per ton had a slight drop due to the expenses with retrofitting, and this is the impact of the appreciation of the real against the dollar. Let's move on Leo to talk about the consolidated results. Net revenues reflects the significant reduction in the iron ore and also steel products that were not totally offset by the increase of the increase per ton. This is an improvement of the steel unit as a result of the better mix, reaching to levels that the company had reached since the first quarter of last year. Consolidated net income reflects in addition to the best operating results, the positive FX fluctuation in relation to our operations and also an accounting impact and noncash of deferred taxes due to the appreciation of the real as well. Steel sales recorded a drop of 6.9% concentrated in industry, distribution and exports and partially offset with a significant increase in the automotive area, leading to a better sales mix. And there was also a better mix in exports due to a better share in the Argentinian auto market. This better mix led to a better mix of revenue per ton. And as for exports, there was an improvement of nearly 9%. Adjusted EBITDA more than improved and it was very much in line with the first quarter of 2025. This was a result of the better mix, as we mentioned, and the best cost per ton. A better cost per ton. And here, we can see the effect of the improvement in EBIT over EBITDA. COGS was positively impacted by reduction of maintenance costs and major retrofitting, as we mentioned. In addition, we have a better mix that was offset by the lower exchange rate when converting to reals. This positive result apply especially by lower sales of prices and costs and higher volumes. In the mining sector, during the quarter, we had a significant reduction of 21% in the sales volume as it was driven by the seasonal rainfall on production and also on logistics. We also prioritized some areas with best operating performance. Net revenue reflects this drop in volume and the net revenue per ton was maintained stable at $87, the same level as last quarter. The reference price were practically stable with a slightly increase of 0.9%, but they were offset by the higher level of discounts and the different -- differentials as prescribed by the market. Adjusted EBITDA per ton reflects especially the impact of the absorption of fixed costs as a result of lower sales. And now in relation to the financial indicators for the quarter, Usiminas frozen an operating cash flow of BRL 370 million was driven by the EBITDA generation, partially offset by the increase of working capital of BRL 120 million. The working capital variation is associated to a lower accounts payable and an increase of receivable accounts and also due to a reduction in inventory levels. We had a reduction of BRL 67 million in [ trading ] in order to reduce the cost of expenses for the company. It's a movement that we want to continue implementing along the next quarter. We had a CapEx of BRL 285 million, a reduction of 23% in relation to the previous quarter. As a result, we ended the quarter with a free cash flow of BRL 84 million. We ended the quarter maintaining a net cash position at levels which were very similar to the previous quarter. This movement reflects a proportional reduction in the gross debt and also to the cash level influenced by the appreciation of the in relation to the dollar, considering the conversion in the statements. The indicator of net debt over EBITDA also remained stable, reinforcing the consistency in our capital structure. Finally, we have a debt profile, which is very comfortable without relevant maturity in the next years and with the cash and investments enough to cover the indebtedness of the company. Leo, over to you. Thank you.

Thank you, Diego. Now we're going to start our Q&A session. Our first question is for you, Diego. Now we have most questions about costs. So we are going to try to address them all, breaking them down so that we can avoid confusion. So the first question comes from Caio Ribeiro from Bank of America. And this is what they ask from XP. Could you provide more color about the cost evolution of the input of the second quarter in relation to the first quarter? Which are the main drivers? How do you expect the cash per ton to increase? [ Guilherme ] completes -- asking for more details about the impact in the context of the increase in inputs and raw materials and freight that you mentioned in the outlook. Diego, over to you.

Thank you very much for the question. In relation to the inputs for the next quarter, all raw materials will have an increase. We have already been seeing in slabs and this has no impact in the previous quarter due to the timing considering the moment when the slabs were purchased, but there will be an impact for the next quarter. And we also see that higher price in cokes and also in the coal. And Marcelo has mentioned that we see an impact caused by the freight increases that would affect mining activities, especially. However, as of the second quarter, they will start causing impact on the supply of raw materials. So these are the main drivers.

Thank you. Still about costs Rafael Barcellos, Bradesco, Gabriel Barra from Citi, and [ Emerson ] from Goldman Sachs. They ask the following. So what's the magnitude of cost reduction when you reduce maintenance costs? Is this something we are going to have an effect in the next half of the year? And the retrofitting will be offset in the next quarters? Or do you see that the cost will have some level of sustainability? And is there a space for room for better performance in the operations in terms of energy and raw materials? Diego?

The cost per ton was at $15 per ton. So divided by ton, we made some savings. In relation.

I'm sorry, Diego, just to specify that you're talking specifically about major repairs, right?

Yes, major repairs and maintenance. Yes, these are the 2 factors that explain the savings that we had. So I mentioned, we have $15 per ton. So it's an temporal or permanent effect. This was the question. We believe that this is going to be permanent. We have no expectations of anything changing unless something unexpected change happens. So this -- the cost may come back in the future, and this will be reflected in the activities. And these are the activities we are trying to do more efficiently. And to add Diego's comments, as I had mentioned in the previous calls, we are deeply focused in improving industrial efficiency, and we started important initiatives in order to improve efficiency. We have adopted tools to optimize and make all the repairs in a more effective way, especially the planned repairs. And in terms of cash control and in terms of asset controls, we have [ mentioned ] all the dimension in order to optimize all the flows and all the related costs. And we can see the results because we have been doing this for more than 2 years. And this is a continuous process as the expectation is to continue improving efficiency along those lines.

We have here another question related to cost, but I believe it's more directed to Miguel. Caio Ribeiro from Bank of America. He asks if the price increases were enough to offset the cost pressure? Or do you think more increases will be necessary?

I think your question is very important so that we can clarify and apply the dynamics that we use for our prices along the quarter. And also for the present moment. The increase of January had the purpose of improving the margins of the steel sector after a long period of lean margins, considering that we were in conditions of unfair competition as we have observed in the last 3 years in Brazil. After the beginning of the war in 28th of February, we saw the pressure on costs, as Marcelo and Diego mentioned. And this leads the need for increasing prices as of April. As of now, we are always mentioning the negotiations in relation to spot businesses and the distribution. So we are in a scenario of high volatility and uncertainties. So we are going to be analyzing very cautiously the profitability of each operation in terms of imposing new prices for the spot prices. The industrial sectors will continue this trend. We'll continue making adjustments in the spot prices as we renew the agreements.

Thank you, Miguel. Diego, still related to costs. Now focusing on the ForEx. We have questions by Gabriel Barra and Ricardo Monegaglia from Safra. He says, should we expect 2-digit levels? Or should there be any pressure should the ForEx fluctuation revert? The functional currency helped us in nonrecurring manner. Or how -- what were the changes? And what were the exchange rate used? Ricardo ask saying the following. What was the estimated impact on the COGS price for the first quarter, considering this FX rate? And can we think about the aid of BRL 50 million in the EBITDA of the quarter compared to the previous methodology? And what's the evolution that we can expect in relation to the FX fluctuations?

Thank you, Gabriel and Ricardo. In relation to the margins that we are -- what we are estimating for the next quarter, as Marcel has mentioned, we are expecting an EBITDA level, which should be stable. And we are likely to have an improvement in the steel sector to offset the mining activities. In relation to the functional currency effects, the main effects that we can see is on the one side, we should consider the net position in reals in a consolidated way. Because that will lead it to FX gain of BRL 110 million. And also, there is an impact in the deferred credit, which was something very significant, amounting to BRL 450 million, which is a very large -- a large share of the net income. And that will depend on the future FX variation. If there's no variation, we are going to see the effect on the results. If the FX is maintained what we saw yesterday, for sure, we are going to have a very similar result. And then the type of FX rate used. If I'm not mistaken, -- at the end of December, it was 5.5. And at the end of the March, it was 5.2. It had an impact on the cash cost of the steel sector in dollars. So it is cash cost. It's in dollars, so there will be no changes. So when we convert into reals, we use FX, FX rate, which was lower in relation to the previous period.

So there was another question. No, that's it. Okay. The next question is still about costs. Diego, Edgard and Daniel from Itau, [indiscernible], would like to understand this line in our cost of others. So they are asking us to give more color because when we look at the history track, there may be a seasonality influencing. So what can we expect for the second quarter? Is this already considering the outlook of the cost increase that was shared with us? So from BRL 240 million, we saw a drop of BRL 89 million in the line. And what can we expect? So they want details about this reduction, and this is what [ Guilherme ] asks us. Diego.

This line is very pulverized, but we're not likely to see a seasonality influence. Now answering your last question in relation to the bonus payment. So except for this, all the others are very [polarized].

Now Miguel, about third-party slabs, [indiscernible] they say it attracted our attention, the level of purchases that you made of slabs. So how does slab price has impacted the production of rolled steel in Cubatao. So how do you use the blast furnaces of Ipatinga? And can we expect the slab price level to be maintained at the same level? So the question is, is the level of purchase likely to be maintained?

Of course, you have been following the international indicators for slabs. We have been suffering a lot of pressure since the Iran war started. And based on this, we can simulate the allocation of our production between Ipatinga and Cubatao. Of course, this will be a result of the best economic decision. Obviously, so we have to meet the need of each client at a certain moment. So what to expect for the future, we can expect our production to increase in Ipatinga with the blast furnaces and a reduction of activities in Cubatao in the short term. We are going to continue monitoring the market opportunities and alternatives so that we can go back to the levels at Cubatao that we want or to look for profitable alternatives for the company.

Thank you, Miguel. Marcelo There's a question by Gabriel Barra from Citi about the Iran conflict. This is a question. The effect of conflict did not affect the quarter of the steel sector is not so affected by the war. Marcelo, could you answer this?

Gabriel, thank you very much for the question. We all know the impact of the gas, of the oil barrel, which has a significant increase. And this impacts the cost of transportation and energy in all the logistics and production chain in general. In the first quarter, we hadn't seen this reflected on the results yet. But as we update all the indicators and all the contracts related to the indicators, we are sure to see those impacts. All industrial sector will have this impact and other sectors in the economy will also have the impact. The freight will have a significant impact. So the maritime transportation imports and exports will be impacted. I would say that this is inevitable. So the cost will be impacted eventually.

Thank you, Marcelo. Miguel -- now about sales. We have many questions about sales, and I'll try to concentrate them. of Goldman Sachs, [ Guilherme ] of XP and Caio Greiner of UBS asked the following questions. Considering the stable volume of production, considering the strategy of the company, is there room for gain in market share? The focus would be in maximizing the revenue per ton and profitability. And the expectation -- what's the expectation to imports to drop? And what you expect the stable volumes? And the first quarter was lower than we expected. Do you see any deterioration of the demand and [ Guilherme ] adds about the performance of the domestic market. And if we already have a tighter scenario for some specific products, especially those related to antidumping. And Caio Greiner also asks about the strategy. Are you going to continue with the same strategy? Or are you going to go for higher market share? Are you going to prioritize the old over volume?

I'm going to give answers. And Leo, you can help me if I did not answer some questions. In relation to the market, we see a very important resilience of the main consuming sectors of steel. The first would be the automotive sector with an increase in production of auto and also in the formalization of those cars. And ANFAVEA estimates a 4% increase in production. Sectors related to consumption has a very resilient level with the expectations of growth, not very high, but following the macroeconomic indicators of the country. On the other hand, we have sectors that are being affected more in relation to consumption. And they have been facing tough times, especially the sector related to the agribusiness, roads implements, agricultural machineries, which have been drops in consumption. Considering this context and since imports have been increasing in the first quarter, in spite of the measures that have been implemented by the government, especially antidumping and cold rolling mill and coated rolling mill, but we see that the inventories will be very high. And as a consequence, there will be a stability in the apparent consumption of steel that could be better in the second half of the year when the inventory levels are more normalized. And then we expect a stability in the sales in the second quarter. In relation to the share, it would be fair to think we can talk about the second half of the year. We can talk about export -- import of steel, especially those with unfair competition will have some improvements. And Usiminas will then be a very important player in increasing the share of supply of local or domestic market. In relation to the prioritization of value over volume and profitability, it's fair to think that in a scenario of high volatility after the year on war, we tend to be more demanding in our decisions. so that we can make spot negotiations and also in relation to important projects in the medium and long term.

Thank you, Miguel. There is a follow-up on the functional currency. [ Gabriel Simoes ] and Marcelo Arazi from BTG. So what would be a follow-up on the cost and the function currency, especially those which have higher consumption. For example, the change of functional currency helped to reduce the cost of the raw materials after the conversion in real. And Marcelo asks us to quantify the effect of this variation should the function of currency remains intact, if there were no changes, what would be the evolution of the cost? What would be the cost behavior? Yes, Diego.

Thank you, Ricardo and Marcelo. The costs are in dollar, the slab cost, coal or they were all converted into dollars. And the costs are accounted for. And then what happens is the conversion into real that happens every month. If the currency is lower, the cost will be shown in real. But it doesn't mean that the functional currency helped to reduce the cost. So we convert into real that will show this effect. In relation to the second question, if you're going to make a quantification, it's something very complex to be done because we would have to redo of the previous quarter that used a different functional currency. We -- it's not something that is required to be done. So it's very complex to redo the previous accounting of the previous quarter.

Thank you, Diego. Miguel, now about exports. [ Rodolfo Angele ] JPMorgan and Igor from Genial asks about exports. Steel sector volumes were lower. So what do you expect for the next period? And Igor asks more details about the prices. And he says that there was a better mix, especially what happened in Argentina. So are you going to continue with this price over volume now in the external market? Are you going to apply this as well to the external market? So what are the expectations for exports?

Thank you, Leo. Our expectations for the second quarter of this year is to maintain a stability, both in terms of mix and the market -- exports market. So we don't see a lot of changes, a lot of variations in this regard. The higher average price is a result of the better mix. As we anticipated in the fourth quarter of last year in the call, we ended the deliveries of oil and gas that we had in the past. We maintain a positive expectation in the sector of oil and gas, especially in Argentina. In the short term, we do not see any closures. For the second half of the year, we have been negotiated important projects that we hope to have -- to be very successful in the negotiations.

Thank you, Miguel. Still about imports. Gabriel, Barra, Citi, [indiscernible] JPMorgan, they ask the following. In spite of the expectation of normalizing the exports, galvanized products has high levels still. So how do you see the competitive dynamics in this specific segment? Should we expect an accommodation of exports in the short run? And Igor says he understand that there was a raise of importers in order to go for the volumes before the measures were applied. So how long do you believe that the market will absorb this excess volume? And lastly,[ Thais ] asks about cold rolling products. So we saw that the volumes dropped, but we still have some inventories in the chain. So some volumes in other regions were also coming in. And we heard about volumes coming in, in other regions. Could you provide some more information about this?

Gabriel, Igor Guedes. For sure, imports of the first quarter were very high, increasing by 30% when we compare to the previous quarter. This suggests a very big pressure in the inventories in the chain. And this will cause impact in the apparent consumption of steel, especially in the domestic market in the next months. The inventory levels cannot be calculated very accurately. But there is an expectation of increasing consumption. But -- so we believe it will take some levels. We believe that this inventory levels will be normalized in the second half of the year. And at that moment, the steel industries, including Usiminas will have more chances of opportunities in relation to the steel consumption in Brazil. What was the other question, Leo, please help me. The question was very relevant. In addition to the increase in imports, we can see an increase of imports, especially in the Southeast Asia. It's very relevant to understand that the world oversupply will be maintained. Even though the Chinese steel in March stands at BRL 120 million per year and generate an imbalance in different countries. This situation generates an indirect impact in the Southeast Asia countries that is to direct those oversupply to Brazil. So it's very important to continue monitoring together with the government, and we must take the right measures so that we can avoid the indirect impact generated by the Chinese oversupply.

Miguel still for you. A question about automotive. [ Diego Mora ] from Goldman Sachs says Ricardo Monegaglia from Safra has 2 questions. The stronger sales mix is sustainable. What are the negotiations of the agreements related to prices? What were the agreements for the automotive industry in April? And what are the impact of the coated and galvanized products in relation to agreements? In the first quarter, we had a big influence of the automotive sector. So how do you expect this to play out in the future?

So let's start from the agreements. The agreements have showing reductions of 2% or 3%, similar to what we negotiated with the agreements that we had in January. We expect the automotive sector to continue the way it is. March was a very relevant month in production, especially in the first 15 days of April, we see this materializing. And ANFAVEA expects an increase of 4% for the year. However, it's very important to mention that both the steel sector and the automotive sector and other sectors of the economy and the Brazilian industry have been facing challenges in relation to imports, both for final products and also in relation to business models that will that are coming to Brazil. So we have a lower impact and lower impact in the production chains in Brazil. It's important, therefore, to continue with our agenda of reindustrialization and also with the public policies to reinforce the productive chain in different sectors. The galvanized products in the auto sector and also the coated products account for 70% of our installed capacity. So 30% of this is impacted by spot businesses and also other industrial sectors. that follow their own agreements. In relation to the favorable mix of the first half of the year, the expectation is to maintain this favorable mix for the second half of the year. In the second half of the year, we have to understand the dynamics of different sectors, the potential reduction of imports in Brazil after the implementation and also the inspection of the measures that were to be implemented by the government.

Thank you, Miguel. Miguel and Diego now. In relation to the outlook that we provided, Rafael Barcellos with Bradesco and Ricardo Monegaglia with Safra asked the following. What is the magnitude of price increase and cost in the steel sector as we're projecting in the outlook? So it's the same questions. They want to know the magnitude. They want to know about the cost and the price for the next quarter.

I'll start, Diego. In terms of price, we have already mentioned, there was an increase in price as of April 1 for the distribution and the spot prices, as we mentioned previously. As -- in relation to the industry, the industrial agreement as of April will follow the trend of the mix of spot prices as we observed in the first quarter of the year. In the automotive sector, we continue with the agreements that we mentioned previously according to the negotiations that have been completed. So we are looking at the raw materials, especially plates and also Coke and coal. And this will have an impact that we will try to handle. However, I cannot provide you with exact numbers or precise magnitude.

Still about outlook related to prices, Guillermo [indiscernible] from JPMorgan and Carlos from Morgan Stanley, they said, what is the domestic performance along the second quarter? And do you see a more positive impact for the dumping -- for the local industry during the antidumping measures? So when will the price pass-through will happen? And how has this been impacted by the imported products? And [indiscernible] asks for more color about the increases in April that you have already mentioned. And if you expect any price changes for May and June, do we expect movements to happen, Miguel?

In relation to the positive scenario for the local industry based on commercial measures, we do not see the impact of the measures that were defined in the beginning of the year. Why? Because as we mentioned previously, there were there was an increase of the import of there was an increase of the inventory level. So the results will take a bit longer. So there was a drop in the local production. So as the local mills cannot increase their share in the apparent consumption of steel in the country. Of course, the measures will then have the expected results. In relation to prices, we implemented a 5% increase in the spot sector as of April 1 and we're going to continue monitoring the pressure of costs in the international market, the cost of energy. And based on that, we will see the -- what will happen to the new adjustments for the next months. We still do not have the adjustments already defined, but we are monitoring all the situation very closely. And this will also be related to higher volatility in our local costs. Leo, did I miss anything?

No, I think you answered his questions. I said that the cost would be the most successful question, but no, there's a very long section about the commercial aspect. Carlos asks if you could mention this percentage of increase in April for the spot price as distribution and industrial segment industrial agreements.

For the distribution sector, the adjustments implemented was at 5% as of April 1, the industrial agreements that start as of April should follow the dynamics that was observed in the spot price in the first quarter that had a very similar level of 5% or 6% in the distribution sector. Not all the agreements are updated on April 1. Some of them will have the update only on July 1.

Thank you, Miguel. We're moving towards the end, and I still have a lot of questions here with me. So I'm going to try to select the main ones. Miguel, about price parity. As Brian and Marcelo has asked about what's the import parity for the rolling and coated product? And what are we to expect for the future? The calculation of the parity is very interesting and why is that?

Because different from what we saw in the past, when we talked about parity, the calculation used to be made based on market prices and outside of unfair competition and oversupply situation. When we compare, for example, the domestic market price against the price -- domestic price in Europe and the United States, we still are at lower levels that have defense -- commercial defense so as to balance the commercial market in the -- internally. So you can make recalculations. So it could be about 15% nowadays. But with impact on this price which is a price, which is impacted by the oversupply conditions of the international market.

Now, Miguel, commercial defense, Gabriel Barra, [indiscernible] of UBS ask the following: Gabriel asks about the hot rolling product. When the antidumping was not implanted, can we see this reflected in imported volumes? Do you think there will be other drop in hot coils and what are the measures to be implemented along the year? Marcelo completes asking about the share. If you have seen alternative routes for the imports of steel, such as Korea or Vietnam. And the price -- have the prices being more competitive than those are Chinese products. And could this increase the parity of the industries and [indiscernible] completes, asking about the vision about the implementation of the antidumping measures. After the implementation of antidumping measures, we will see an increase of prices and how you see the import parity of coated products? Yes, please.

It's very relevant to implement the antidumping measures for hot rolling product. So we see what we saw in the cold rolling and coated products that have been very important. We still do not see a reduction in the results. So we are likely to see this when the -- there was a raise for anticipating those purchase of those materials. In terms of Vietnam and Korea, as an alternative route, we have observed a significant increase of imports from other origins China, especially Korea, Vietnam and other countries from the Southeast Asia. In commercial conditions, very similar to those offered by China. So this is a result of the high pressure that China has in the local market, leading those countries or leading those industries to have unfair competition in their exports. So this is very relevant, and we are very attentive to those cases so that we can activate the tools that we have for commercial defense so as to avoid the impacts that we have seen in the last 3 years, with a high increase of Chinese imports. So it's very important to keep monitoring and working with the local authorities, so that we can make -- adopt the right measures of defense. In relation to the price, I think I answered previously in relation to the parity and how we see the prices to play out in the future.

Thank you, Miguel. There is a follow-up. But I think you have already answered. Luis from -- asks about the price of Asia, you have heard Asia about Vietnam and Korea. So we are moving towards the end. So let's try it a bit quick. Diego, about deferred, Gabriel Barran says, the income was very favored by deferred tax credits and FX effects. How can we expect the effective tariff or liquid for the next quarter. How can you see that? Gabriel?

The impact of the tax credit with deferred taxes will depend on the type of FX rate because the accounting base is in dollars and when the real is appreciated against the dollar, there's an increase. And then this credit is increased. We have the inverse movement we would have a negative result on this. So that will depend the kind of effects. In relation to the financial result, and this is more linked to the net position in reals will also depend on the evolution of net cash in reals that we have. So we are going to continue monitoring this, so that we can minimize the effect.

Marcelo, one question for you about compacters. Gabriel Barra from Citi, and Ricardo from Safra ask the following: what are the analysis of compact analysis can be done in phases, which is the most likely scenario and the friable, what the duration of the life of the mine. Is there any decision to be made still this year and the environmental permitting and all the documents at MUSA, what would be the expected timing for those -- and for the FID and approval? Marcelo, can you answer that?

Thank you, Leo, Rafael, Gabriel and Ricardo. I'm going to try to summarize. As we have been mentioning, the permitting is working well. According to the time line, considering magnitude and complexity of the project. In 2026, we believe we can have the confirmation, so that we complete all the permitting process. In relation to the friables, we have been making a new sizing of all the reserves and by using different strategies, we have been able to extend the useful life of the friables. And this is very important for us, the strategic view in addition to optimizing the assets that are already existing for the operation of friables. I would say that these are the main components. And as we evolve and we continue with the process of permitting, so at the end of 2026 and the beginning of 2027, we expect to have a proposal and also to analyze the alternatives. And this is a highly complexity project. And we have different alternatives. We have very good engineering team in order to optimize each of the possible steps. And we are very likely to have a very competitive and efficient split. So this proposal can be callinated in phases.

Thank you, Marcelo. Marcelo and Diego. We have questions about projects. So Gabriel Coelho Barra . Gabriel asks about the advances of the PCI project. Can it give an additional upside in the margin still this year. Can you comment on the evolution of other projects of the efficiency of the company, such as Coke batteries and gas holders. And how can we think about the PCI implementation leading to lower cost per ton. What can we expect in terms of efficiency after the implementation? And would it would reduce the purchase of still called for by third parties -- from third parties?

The PCI project is a project that is in the final stage. And as I mentioned in the remarks, we are already capitalizing on it because there's a part in the blast furnace that has already been completed and that helps us to make the distribution of fuel and blast furnace in a very efficient manner. So we have been able to implement our PCI and our blast furnace 3 is where this investment is mostly concentrated. So we have already started to capitalize on this on the efficiency of the field as of this quarter, the second quarter and we are likely to capitalize it on full as of the fourth quarter without a doubt. And this will allow us to reduce the purchase of external Coke because this is going to be a replacement from this coal to Coke because this is a field that we are going to be applying internally. And the other projects are moving in alignment to our plan in a very efficient manner. For example, our Coke plant has two main sectors. One of the sector is undergoing hot repair. We have already advanced by 50% in this activity. So this will improve our environmental performance and we also have a very good thermal efficiency and there is a complete construction destruction of the other section of the Coke plant. And next month, we'll be able to see the construction works. So we had auction process and also the technical part, the technical dimensions in order for the implementation to happen. And the engineering side is also very advanced. So in 2 years' time, 2.5 years' time, we will have a very good improvement. And also for gas holders, we will see a very important evolution of the gas holders that will allow us to recover a large quantity of internal gas and we improve the overall efficiency. The sum of all those projects -- we'll be capitalized in a progressive manner in the next quarter until the full completion. In the calls, we are going to share with you the progression of all those activities. And Marcelo, in fact, the hot repair and the PCI plant used up most of the CapEx for the quarter.

Okay. Last question now, we are running out of time. It's about sales at MUSA. Caio Ribeiro with Bank of America, they ask the following: and the mining sector, then with increase of cost and freight, will there be a decrease in the shipping to the external market. MUSA operations were affected in the volumes because of the rainfall. And in the second and third quarters, which are dryer periods, do you believe that you can recover the volumes at the same levels that we had in 2025? Yes, Diego?

In fact, we exported to Asia, but those cost increases impacted our profitability, but it's still profitable. As we can see in the results of MUSA. The diesel cost impact has not had a significant increase. So the higher consumption was associated with internal movement. So in terms of volume, as we mentioned at the beginning of the presentation, we expect a recovery volumes, especially due to higher production. And we are going to prioritize the area with higher grades so that we can continue exporting.

Thank you very everyone. We end the Q&A session now. We would like to thank you for taking part in this event. And if you have any questions, we would like to remind you that the IR team is available to take your questions. Have a good day, everyone. [Statements in English on this transcript were spoken by an interpreter present on the live call.]