Vertiseit AB (publ) (VERTB) Q4 FY2025 Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

February 12, 2026

OM SE Information Technology Software Earnings Calls 37 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Jonas Lagerqvist

Executives
#1

Hi, everyone. Welcome to Varberg and this earnings call. Vertiseit has today released its year-end report for Q4 of 2025. My name is Jonas Lagerqvist, I'm Deputy CEO and CFO of Vertiseit. And with me, I have Johan Lind, CEO of the group. So this morning, we published our Q4 report, and we'll go through it and deep dive into some of the most relevant topics. We will go through the acquisition that was finalized during the quarter of Muse and Stoked AI in Germany. We will look into the quarterly financials. We will present some highlights in the business during the quarter. We will also go through and discuss some key AI-related topics. And we will finish off with a Q&A session where everyone can get their questions answered. And should you have any time have any questions, feel free to use the chat function. [Operator Instructions]. So please, Johan.

Johan Lind

Executives
#2

Yes. So for those of you who are new to the company, Vertiseit, we are a SaaS company. We provide an in-store experience management platform for retailers and brands to facilitate the customer meeting by bridging the gap between online and in person, where the core capability that we have is to be able to orchestrate all digital touch points in store, whether it's for branding purpose, tactic communication, the sales support or all the way to transactional loyalty. So the business model is quite straightforward. So our SaaS revenue is related to the number of deployed touch points in store. Looking into the Muse and Stoked AI acquisition, it's a really interesting one. It's a highly strategic acquisition from our side. Most of our previous acquisitions have been exactly in the same scope as we have acted ourselves, where we have basically covered the full value proposition of the target company. But Muse and Stoked is a little bit different, and I will walk through this with you all. So Muse is a small company, Hamburg-based, 10 employees, founded in 2010. They have been like in the forefront of retail tech and consulting in this space. Like 50-50 portion of in-store audio and in-store experience. And we will go in a little bit into the in-store audio because that's a very interesting one where AI will have a big impact. If you look at -- from a revenue perspective, the revenue was EUR 3 million, EUR 0.8 million in ARR, profitable in line with our -- where the group is running as of now. If we go to next slide, like what -- the important thing with Muse is that it adds a lot of AI expertise into the group, especially in the field of in-store audio, but also in other disciplines. They have been one of the disrupting like companies within the In-store audio space. So what we see is that they add knowledge both in Product Development, Consulting and Operations, and I will get back to that in the AI section later today. The in-store audio is a space which is pretty much as big as traditional digital signage or visual communication. But for many years, we have been outside of this space due to that in-store audio had been highly regulated, very like service-oriented. And what we see now is that you could do like on-demand audio messaging in store with AI. You could leverage also like music libraries that are AI generated, meaning that in-store audio goes from service-oriented service to more of like a product SaaS tech delivery with the margins that we want to have. Interesting thing is also that Muse are very well positioned when it comes to the fashion retail industry in Germany. So they have a lot of like strong local German brands in their portfolio that we can grow with. And we -- what we do is that we bring basically the whole Muse into Visual Art and form a new in-store audio division and bring some of the key people into Consulting. And also Marco will join Grassfish, and he is one of the 2 founders of the company.

Jonas Lagerqvist

Executives
#3

So moving into the quarterly financials. I think this is a chart that many of you are familiar with by now. And we're just proud to say that we keep development according to our track record. We are now passing 14 years of sequential ARR. So we've always managed to grow our ARR from quarter-to-quarter during now 14 years, which is somewhat of an achievement. Some high-level bullets from the quarter is that we keep growing our ARR. The ARR amounted to SEK 332 million by the end of the quarter. That's a year-over-year growth of 27%. And out of that 27%, 16% is organic, which altogether is a growth number exceeding our financial target of 20%. We also managed to deliver profitability during the second half of the year of 20%, which was the profitability level that we guided for when we communicated this target in Q2 2025. During the quarter, we have expanded our AI capabilities, both internally, but also through the acquisition of Muse and Stoked AI and all across both our product development, our Consulting business and in our internal operations. We strengthened our organization in Germany. We continued to grow during profitability. We've also had a really high inflow of high-quality international leads on a level that we have not seen before, which gives us like a very positive stance going into 2026. We've also started an evaluation to relist the company to NASDAQ main markets, in line with our ambition of building a strong like quality company and being able to attract even more and broader investor base. So 27% growth year-over-year, of which 16% was organic. When looking at the net revenue retention, it remained stable and even increased a bit, so just above 108%, meaning that more than 50% of our organic growth now comes from growth on our existing customers, which is a solid receipt that we have a competitive offer that we deliver quality and value-creating solutions to our customers so that they want to keep growing their business and keep expanding with us. The churn rate on like an annualized level stayed at 3%, which is very low and that we are really happy for. And we see that the sales environment is improving when we now enter 2026. On net revenue level, we decreased our top line by 8%, and that is very much related to decreasing system sales during the quarter. And when we decrease system sales, we do that in favor of delivering hardware through our partners, which is in line with our overall strategy in order to become more scalable and being able to expand more rapidly. So we delivered on the 20% EBITDA guidance for H2. And worth mentioning is that we have some one-off costs during the quarter of approximately SEK 5 million that we are not adjusting for. So underlying profitability is somewhat stronger than the actual reported.

Johan Lind

Executives
#4

Great. And looking into SaaS metrics, it looks like a lot of red dots. So I think we brought this into the presentation just to give you like a high-level understanding of what's the impact. So what Jonas just mentioned is that like growth on existing customers is super strong, representing more than 50% of organic growth. So net revenue retention is strong. The customer acquisition costs are highly impacted on a year-over-year basis. But that's explained by Visual Art now being included for 12 months and the business model with Visual Art is having a higher sales -- a higher spend on sales organization and marketing. But what we should look at is really the actual CAC. So it's still way more cheaper to actually grow organically than even the cheapest acquisition that we do. So the actual CAC and CAC ratio is still really, really strong numbers compared to most SaaS companies I looked at. If you look at the average revenue per account, it's diluted in Q4, and it's diluted due to MDT being -- MDT was part of the ARR number the quarter before, but it was fully integrated in the end of the quarter, meaning that all accounts and the impact on the SaaS metrics was in Q4. So when we bought MDT, it was -- we aimed for Deutsche Telekom and McDonald's, but we also had a long, long tail of smaller customer, which pushed down the average revenue per account. And so that's why it looks like a trend shift in that KPI. But overall, I think the SaaS metrics are really solid. And if you have any other questions on those KPIs, don't hesitate to reach out to us. Looking at some business highlights. We often get a lot of questions on customers and how expansion on new contracts are going and so on. And I just want to mention like 3. So 3 of the customers with highest impact on the growth in the quarter was Stadium, where we roll out the retail media network. Salling Group, the biggest contract we secured last year. We have now exceeded 8,000 licenses that are active. Circle K is a slightly older contract, but where we, during the year, have expanded into the U.S. market and other highlight is, of course, that we now see that we execute on the strategies that we have for each brand. So we -- NRF in New York, the biggest retail conference in the world, we were represented with both Dise, Grassfish and Visual Art, but with a slightly different approach. So Dise were together with the Digital Signage Federation, shared space where they met with partners. Grassfish had partner dinners outside. We had in New York events at Bosch dealership as an example, working together with large integrators on that one. And Visual Art had their own booth at NRF and had really nice numbers in footfall and lead generation there. So it's nice to see that we actually can execute on different like go-to-market strategies and different value propositions in reality and not just in theory. Circle K, just to give you a little bit of an overview. So this is the map now where we can see all of the locations that now are running our system. So Circle K is now exceeding 16,000 units deployed. And the cool thing with that is that it's still just 14% brand penetration because this concept is actually designed from a global perspective, even though we go after market by market. When another topic that is like high priority for the year in our company is to leverage like AI in product Consulting and Operations. And I think we have gained a lot of like traction just the latest quarter. And we brought some key people from the Muse acquisition into our AI task force, which -- where we have equipped all employees with the right tool sets. We can see that we have more than like 30 agents and Vibe coded components that help us in daily operations as of today. In Consulting, we start to see a lot of like productivity gains. We improve on content workflows. And the same goes for product where we launched like almost a year ago, we launched the first like AI targeting scheduling mechanism into the product. We now bring in-store audio and messaging in as a module. And we also bring new modules for actually generate like content and enhance, content quality and so on into the product. So I think it's super exciting times to really -- like every week, we see like new opportunities in the landscape. When I -- at the same time, I get, of course, a lot of questions from investors, customers and people I meet like, okay, like how will AI impact the software industry? How will it impact Vertiseit and what are the opportunities and threats and so on. And so like a short description of like our analyze right now is that like the higher up in our vertical stack that you are, the most gain you can have from AI. So from an opportunities perspective, we have productivity gains in our Consulting offering. Basically, we can build like applications and content and solutions and even integrations much faster than before. In product development, especially like isolated modules to our platforms can be developed much faster than before. Also like the UX experience and adoption to different vertical-specific needs or even customer needs are there. Threats is, of course, that it's a threat that Consulting are affected by more and more like in-house competition. But to be frank, in our business, it's not bad. Like we don't do consulting for the sake of consulting. It's like a tool to secure that we deliver value for our customers so that they deploy our solution and that it generates more licenses. So even if it's short term can have like an impact on Consulting, it can also be a boost in adaptation. Another threat is, of course, increased competition in product development. And I think it's like what we can see in gains in productivity and speed and innovation, it's the same for our competitors. So it's just to be on our toes and continue to lean forward and keep a high pace. We also see like we have not seen it in practice, but we can see it in theory that there will be an opportunity for even for customers to build like slim CMS layers that are basically Vibe coded in connection to their internal stack. But in those cases, they will still need like an underlying infrastructure, device management playout, everything that we have. So looking into like barriers, resilience, like we are really like vertical -- it's a vertical integration that we provide, everything from what needs the customer in terms of content and UX in the applications, data layers to make that content personalized and targeted. It's customer-specific modules applications beneath that. You have the product modules, you have our core CMS, but you also have the core capabilities, the infrastructure and the actual playout and device management where our software is installed in devices, which is actually the IXM Grid. Yes. So if you look at the points, like deeply integrated into customers' ecosystem, it's on device, it's device management for all Operation Systems where we can control units that are like 7 years old. And of course, also that we are -- when we are infrastructure is also very high demands when it comes to security and workflows, et cetera, where, of course, you need to meet the highest standards in the market. But -- so like if you look at like from a positive point of view, I think what we see with AI, I think we can bring more solutions faster to a lower price point to the market. And what from a logical perspective, that should give us like more deployment, more licenses, and we don't see like any risk at least the coming years for like infrastructure to be affected. Do you have any more points to that, Jonas or reflections?

Jonas Lagerqvist

Executives
#5

No. I think we can move into the Q&A, and I look forward to receiving any questions on this because I know that this is high on like all software investors' agendas right now. So we received some questions in regards to the list change that we're evaluating. And what we can say there is that it is currently being evaluated by the Board. And like more communication will, of course, come as this evaluation progresses and any decisions are taken.

Jonas Lagerqvist

Executives
#6

And now we have Fredrik from Redeye that would like to join the call. Fredrik?

Fredrik Nilsson

Analysts
#7

I want to start with a comment in the CEO letter. You mentioned that you believe that your market position is stronger than ever. Could you perhaps elaborate a bit on that? Why is it? And how do you see that's the case?

Johan Lind

Executives
#8

Yes. Like it's an observation like how much attention we get when we are out in the market. So we -- as you know, in the first quarter, we have been at NRF, we have been at ISC. And I can just see that the footfall and the traction there is better than it's ever been. But what we also see is that the international leads that we get are more like global and they also come from a bigger portion of those come outside of our core territory. Of course, the majority of our contracts and customer relations is from Nordic and the DACH region. But now we see a big portion also from North America, Middle East, even India and so on.

Fredrik Nilsson

Analysts
#9

Interesting. Great. And if we look at the organic ARR growth, your outlook in the last quarter were quite optimistic. You mentioned some tariff-related softness in Q2 spilling over and so on. Yet in Q4, the growth is roughly similar to Q3. I mean, why is that? And do you think the current inflow of business opportunities, as you mentioned, is enough to take you back to about 15%?

Johan Lind

Executives
#10

Yes, it's a very good question. Like what we have seen is that our business opportunities are a bit larger in size. The cycle of closing more international business is longer. So the pipeline looks healthy, but we wish that we had closed a little bit more business in the last quarter than we did. So I would say that we are not 100% satisfied with the growth pace organically, even though it is still healthy figures. But most important, we should have a slightly stronger cash flow than we have. So that's the 2 focus areas for us now is to bring out like a stronger profitability cash flow and of course, improve slightly on the organic growth. And to give you some sort of direction for the year, I believe the year to be stronger than last year when it comes to growth. Still Q1, Q2 is normally like weaker than Q3, Q4 and Q3 is normally the strongest when it comes to profitability.

Fredrik Nilsson

Analysts
#11

Great. That's helpful. So also one question about AI. As you mentioned, you demonstrated some features at Grassfish Summit last year. So regarding that features and other features in general, what's the feedback so far? And what's the general interest in AI from customers currently?

Johan Lind

Executives
#12

I think just the last like 6 months and the last quarter, in particular, when we look into basically all tenders or processes that we are part of, it's top on the agenda. Like your product needs to be agent-friendly, needs to be able to integrate into the workflows that the customer basically design. So it's like highest on the priority on the customers' agenda when selecting a platform today. Together with security, I would say. Security is also ramping up in significance.

Jonas Lagerqvist

Executives
#13

Now we have Rikard, analyst from Carnegie.

Johan Lind

Executives
#14

We don't hear you yet, Rikard. We can take maybe a quick question in between.

Jonas Lagerqvist

Executives
#15

Yes. You have a -- okay, a couple of technical questions, financial questions about the personnel costs, the cost of staff that are up approximately 10% compared to last year, even though cost savings were implemented in Q2.

Johan Lind

Executives
#16

You can take that...

Jonas Lagerqvist

Executives
#17

Yes. And there is -- of course, since during the year, although that we have done cost savings, we have also made 2 acquisitions, which have added quite a few employees. And also looking into the quarter isolated, we had -- there were like SEK 5 million in extraordinary costs that were adjusted for. And as previously mentioned, roughly the same amount that actually exists in the P&L that were not adjusted for. And I would say that both of these items amount to about SEK 10 million are items that will not be carried forward. And the split between them -- between like administrative costs and the cost of staff is about 50-50 on this. So that should be like somewhat of a guidance of the actual like running cost level that we are on right now. And another relevant question is, of course, FX effects. And as people might know, I mean, the Swedish crown has been appreciated during the quarter, which has quite material effects on ARR in absolute numbers as like 50% of our SaaS revenues are in like non-Swedish crowns. So that's also the reason that we always talk about growth in fixed currencies. So of course, it has an impact on the absolute reported number in ARR and I would say -- but on bottom line level on EBITDA level, it has a minor impact since we have a good hedge in the shape of having both revenue and costs in the same currencies like throughout the organization. But of course, obviously, if there is an effect on EBITDA as well, but I would estimate that to approximately 5%. Some questions regarding gross profit that we have somewhat reduced our gross profits on SaaS. We've increased margins on SaaS. I would say on the Systems side, our margins are typically like somewhere in the like 27%, 28% range. Now we had a stronger quarter this quarter, a weaker quarter 1 year ago, and that is very much dependent on the character of the actual rollouts being performed on the markets that we sell hardware.

Johan Lind

Executives
#18

And it can fluctuate quite heavily. So it totally depends on what type of projects we are running and in what competition.

Jonas Lagerqvist

Executives
#19

Yes. So Rikard, let's give it a try. Can you hear us?

Rikard Engberg

Analysts
#20

Can you hear me now?

Jonas Lagerqvist

Executives
#21

Yes, perfect.

Rikard Engberg

Analysts
#22

Okay. Great. And my first question is, you present that you roughly have around 14% brand penetration of Circle K. And looking at other similar like very big customers, what level are you on these? Should we Circle K lower than average or on average?

Johan Lind

Executives
#23

It's a little bit lower. If you take our key account customers representing like 75% of our turnover. The average penetration for the concept for the markets that they are designed for is around 30%.

Rikard Engberg

Analysts
#24

Okay. And also, like if we look on the NRR, I mean, is this the sort of level given the penetration you have on your largest customers that we should look for going forward, slightly below 110%? Or do you see the increase, as you say, increased sentiment that it might accelerate during 2026?

Johan Lind

Executives
#25

Good question. Like normally, we say that we are satisfied if we have 50% of the organic growth in -- from existing customers base. So if we grow like 16% organically, the NRR should be 108% in that example. So I think I expect that pattern to be solid throughout the year. So if we manage to increase the organic growth, most likely NRR will follow. And if not, it will follow the same pattern in the other direction.

Jonas Lagerqvist

Executives
#26

And then there is the like recurring question regarding acquisitions and whether or not we plan to like endure and keep the current or planned pace of doing 2 to 4 acquisitions per year. And that is, of course, repeating our growth strategy, like aside from growing organically by approximately like 15% to 20%, we do selected acquisitions like along the way. And these can be like the larger ones, like more transformative strategic acquisitions like we've done, for example, Visual Art. And we have our roll-up acquisitions, which is smaller in size, more or less acquisitions of customer base and which we are supposed to integrate really rapidly, maximum 3 months, but we always do these acquisitions sequentially. So we never do overlapping acquisitions, meaning that we have like room in a year to perform 2 to 4 acquisitions. And there is no change to that ambition. So I think that is what you can expect from us also going forward. And I think that was it for this time. So we thank you all for participating and listening into this earnings call. And should you have any other questions or comments, feel free to reach out to me or to Johan any time. Thank you very much, and see you here again soon.

Johan Lind

Executives
#27

Thank you so much. Bye-bye.

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Vertiseit AB (publ) earnings transcripts and 32,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.