Vicinity Centres (VCX) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

August 17, 2022

Australian Securities Exchange AU Real Estate Retail REITs earnings 65 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator

operator
#1

Thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Vicinity Centres FY '22 Annual Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to hand the conference over to Mr. Grant Kelley, CEO and Managing Director. Please go ahead.

Grant Kelley

executive
#2

Good morning, and thank you for joining us for Vicinity Centres Results Call for the 12 months ended 30 June 2022. Before we begin, I'd like to acknowledge the traditional custodians of the lands on which we meet today and pay my respects to their elders past, present and emerging. And I extend that respect to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples on the call today. Joining me on today's call are Peter Huddle, Vicinity's Chief Operating Officer; and Adrian Chye, our Chief Financial Officer. And I'll start today on Slide 5. FY '22 was a year of recovery and substantial progress at Vicinity. Our results highlight strong operational and financial execution in a recovering retail landscape where consumers continue to show confidence and capacity to spend and retailer confidence was robust. We made significant progress against our long-term strategy this year. Our core retail portfolio performance was strengthened by driving high-quality asset management, including the introduction of on-trend retailers and the success of the luxury retail category across our Flagship, Outlet and CBD centers. During the year, we also made strategic decisions to enhance the overall quality of our portfolio, upweighting our leadership position in the growing Outlet sector, with the acquisition of a 50% interest in Harbour Town Gold Coast and divesting our 50% interest in Runaway Bay at an 18% premium to book value, while also delivering earnings accretion. We invested in our funds management and third-party capital business, notably with the appointment of David McNamara in February this year, and have been able to participate in potential opportunities in a far more targeted and focused manner. And finally, we have transitioned to execution of our retail and mixed-use development pipeline, as many of you would have seen at our development showcase in June. As Adrian will discuss in more detail shortly, our financial results in FY '22 highlight our continued recovery from the pandemic. We delivered statutory net profit after tax of $1.2 billion, representing a $1.5 billion uplift on the prior year. The Board declared a final distribution of $0.057 per security, bringing the total FY '22 distribution to $0.104, representing a payout ratio of 95.3% of AFFO. We maintained our disciplined approach to financial stewardship and, despite the disruption and cost of the pandemic, preserved our strong balance sheet and credit metrics. Gearing remains at the low end of our 25% to 35% target range, and we enter FY '23 with around 85% of our drawn debt hedged. Pleasingly, the uplift in valuations in FY '22 has supported a strong uplift in our NTA. From a retail trading perspective, while our 2 largest states, Victoria and New South Wales, were in lockdown for much of the first half of the year, we observed a significant and sustained rebound in retailer confidence and retail trading conditions in the 6 months that followed. Demonstrating the underlying resilience of the Australian retail sector, sales across our portfolio in the second half of FY '22, surpassed pre-COVID levels by nearly 16% despite the outbreak of Omicron in late December 2021. As Peter will talk to you shortly, this profound recovery in the retail sector after the lockdowns in early FY '22 underpinned another 6 months of positive leasing momentum. And finally, as I'll describe in more detail later, we are pleased to, once again, provide earnings guidance for FY '23. Turning now to Slide 6. And in the 6 months since we last showed this slide, there has been a shift in the macroeconomic landscape and near- to medium-term outlook. Consumer sentiment is being impacted by rising inflation, associated interest rate increases and reducing confidence in the economic outlook both in Australia and abroad. That being said, at a broader retail industry level, falling consumer confidence has not dampened consumer spending. And from a Vicinity perspective, we continue to observe elevated retail sales in our centers relative both to prior year and pre-COVID levels. With a record low unemployment rate, historically high numbers of job advertisements, and with household savings continuing to be more than 10%, which is still well above the 5-year average, we believe that any potential negative impact on consumer spending may be limited. Looking forward, while we are mindful that the immediate outlook is uncertain and ultimately depends on where and when inflation peaks, we cautiously anticipate a soft landing for the Australian retail sector over the next 12 to 18 months. I'll now hand you over to Peter Huddle, who will provide an overview of our operating performance for the full year.

Peter Huddle

executive
#3

Thanks, Grant, and good morning. I will start on Slide 8 with a review of our retail trading conditions. Similar to FY '21, we would describe FY '22 as a tale of two halves. The majority of the first half was materially impacted by prolonged lockdowns in our 2 largest states, Victoria and New South Wales, whilst the second half reflected a more normalized period despite some ongoing impacts from Omicron across the country. The important point, though, is that the momentum of recovery observed in the first half accelerated in the second half. We saw a steady improvement in visitation and shoppers continue to spend, on average, 30% more per visit than pre-COVID. Shopper preference for omnichannel retail, which combines the power of the physical store with an online presence, was further supported by a contraction in the rate of online sales growth between October '21 and June '22. The buoyant retail trading conditions in the second half underpinned a strengthening in retailer confidence, which in turn, drove strong leasing activity, particularly through April to June. While CBDs continue to improve, visitation remains at below pre-COVID levels. a prolonged return of CBD office workers has impacted mid-week traffic. However, weekend trade in the second half returned to near pre-COVID levels as day shoppers returned en masse assisted by city activities and events. Turning now to Slide 9. The trend of annual retail sales growth across our portfolio since FY '19 also shows a clear recovery is evident. We have highlighted the second half of FY '22 to further depict the return of consumer confidence and sales outside of government mandated lockdowns. Total portfolio sales in the half increased by 11.5%. And while the bulk of this growth was observed across our Victoria and New South Wales centers, the specialty and mini major sales in other states also continue to grow despite coming off a high growth of 13.4% for FY '21. More specifically, as we emerge from the pandemic, we have seen shoppers keen to refresh their wardrobes, indulge in high-value items such as jewelry and luxury goods as well as return to in-center dining and entertainment activities. As part of this recovery, it's been particularly pleasing to see the strong recovery in SME retailer sales after a challenging 2 years. Turning to Slide 10. Together with our rigorous focus on collecting due and overdue rent, the sustained strength of retail sales in the second half led to stronger cash collections. In FY '22, we collected on average 91% of gross billings. And in the second half, we collected 93% of gross billings. With the expiry of the SME Codes in New South Wales and Victoria in March, we have steadily completed required negotiations with SME retailers and forecast conclusion of those terms prior to the end of the calendar year. For non-SME retailers, whose leases are not governed by the code, we are substantially more progressed in terms of providing targeted assistance where required, resulting in materially improved financial outcomes relative to those in the pandemics of FY '20 and '21. With SME retailer sales performance broadly in line with non-SME specialty sales, the collection of current and overdue rent for SME tenants improved from 66% of gross billings in the first half to 80% for the full year. Post expiry of the codes in New South Wales and Victoria, we have seen minimal new vacancies, with occupancy slightly increasing to 98.3%. Having said that, we will continue to partner with and support our SME retailers and particularly those in CBD centers. More broadly, cash collections from our national and major tenants move closer towards pre-COVID levels, particularly in the second half. This again reflects not only the strong retailer sales environment, but also our disciplined approach to if and how we provided rental support to non-SME tenants. Consistent with the prior year, retail administrations remain low, and we've continued to monitor the health of retailers. Turning to Slide 11. We continue to focus on driving high-quality leasing outcomes that not only locked in future NPI growth, but also reflect and enhance the quality of our assets. In the year, we completed 1,378 leasing deals. The majority of these were completed in the second half despite a meaningful moderation in leasing activity in January and February 2022 due to both seasonality as well as the outbreak of Omicron. Once the risk of potential lockdowns abated in March, deal momentum accelerated. In fact, the number of deals completed in June 2022 was nearly 50% higher than the number completed in June 2021. Adding to this, if we take the total managed portfolio, including all project leasing deals, the number of leasing transactions surpassed 2,000 for the year. We leased 374 vacant stores, equating to more than 52,000 square meters of GLA over the year, which in turn supported a modest increase in FY '22 occupancy rate to 98.3%. Leasing spreads continued to show positive momentum, with the average leasing spread for FY '22 improving to negative 4.8% versus negative 12.7% in FY '21. Of all new leasing deals agreed in FY '22, 71% were negotiated with fixed annual increases of 5%, and cumulatively, 94% of all new deals were negotiated with fixed annual increases of at least 4%. Importantly, the average new lease tenure has increased to 5.1 years, reflecting our deliberate focus on repositioning our assets with the right offers that produce recurring growth for the long term. And turning to Slide 12. With the recovery gaining momentum, retailers are positioning themselves for the future. This page shows a selection of new stores that have opened across our portfolio during the year. Vicinity is a key partner to luxury brands. Breitling and Balenciaga are expanding their presence in Australia, taking advantage of strong demand for luxury goods. As with other flagship retailers seeking prominent positions in premium CBD assets, we are excited to have opened Australia's first NBA Store at Melbourne Emporium. We remain focused on our CBD assets to ensure that we capture flagship stores and first-to-market offers that create a retail vibrancy that is second to none. The expansion of quality food offers continues to be a key driver for Vicinity. We have recently opened a superbly finished French browser called Manon at QVB, elevating the offer and assisting the return of trade for this CBD asset. We have worked with growing Melbourne fresh food operator Sacca's Fine Foods to support their expansion plan. After a successful few years since we brought them to Altona Gate, we have further expanded that store and opened a new flagship store for them at Broadmeadows, replacing in part an older discount department store. Importantly, we continue to elevate the offer of our market-leading premium Outlet business, including the expansion of Tommy Hilfiger at DFO South Wharf on this page. Our Outlets business has played an important role through the pandemic and generally performs well through the cycle. Moving to Slide 13. Our retailer-first program has proven to be a successful strategic initiative, with Vicinity increasingly being recognized as a partner of choice for growth-orientated retailers. Of note, our national retailer tenants ranked Vicinity #1 on the retailer Net Promoter Score and #2 overall for tenant satisfaction, which compared Vicinity to 10 retail peers. Our tenant satisfaction score reflects our progress on building stronger and more long-term relationships with our retailers and enhancing tenant experiences. Given that these results occurred in a year with major lockdowns demonstrates the team's commitment to being customer focused. Over the past 12 months, we had around 333 million customer visits through our centers. The persistently strong spend per visit this year has in part been driven by our teams, not only creating an attractive and safe retail environment, but also implementing tailored and global award-winning marketing programs that were highly targeted towards driving retailer sales and enhancing experiences across our diverse portfolio. Turning now to development on Slide 14. I'll provide a brief update on progress made across our $2.9 billion pipeline since our development showcase in June this year. We continue to move from planning to execution. And in August, we received all formal approvals to commence our large-scale fresh food retail and One Middle Road office development at Chadstone. This project will further complement the 2 existing projects already commenced during the period, being the refurbishment of Chadstone Place to introduce Officeworks' new headquarters as well as the development of a new dining and entertainment terrace, which will elevate the leisure experience to be delivered at Chadstone in quarter 3 of FY '23. Our retail redevelopment of Bankstown Central are on track to complete later this year. The center's offering will be notably improved with the introduction of a new Coles supermarket and fresh food precincts as well as new stores, including Uniqlo, Glue and a Services Australia center. At Box Hill South, Coles is expected to open its new store in the coming month, and we are bringing a number of dual-fronted restaurants, while, at the same time, remixing the tenant offer and upgrading the mall finishes. Concurrently, the development of a 4,000 square meter 4-level podium for Hub Australia is on track to open this financial year. We believe Boxer Hill is a great location for co-working being a key metropolitan hub with strong transport links. We continue to progress upgrades across our portfolio to ensure all of our assets remain attractive and relevant to their catchments. More recently, we completed major tenant reconfigurations and/or ambient upgrades of Broadmeadows, Mornington Central and, shortly, at Northgate. On to Slide 15, and we have more projects forecast to start in FY '23. Outside of Chadstone, leasing activity has commenced for the Bankstown Exchange office towers where we have received development approval. We are also nearing commencement of the lower ground redevelopment of Chatswood that will deliver a significantly enhanced fresh food precinct and dining offerings, including quick service restaurants. This will prepare the asset for the larger retail and commercial development planned to commence in FY '24, where an amended development application has been lodged and pre-leasing has materially progressed. At Galleria in Perth, we plan to substantially refurbish the existing center in addition to introducing an enhanced dining and leisure precinct. Pre-leasing is well advanced, and we expect to commence the project during this reporting period. We continue to invest in smaller, more tactical projects across the portfolio that include aesthetic renovations, replacement of underperforming major retailers and the introduction of food and entertainment offers to meet market demands, such as Armidale and Northland. Finally, progress on our 6 major mixed-use destinations continues. Given we own the land parcels earmarked for development, the pipeline is able to be flex up and down in order to preserve risk and return parameters of our projects and pace the capital deployment, thereby ensuring that we can maintain our strong balance sheet credit ratings and disciplined approach to paying distributions. Thank you, and I'll hand the call over to Adrian to discuss our financial performance.

Adrian Chye

executive
#4

Thanks, Peter, and good morning. I'll start on Slide 17. Vicinity delivered a strong financial result for FY '22. Statutory profit for the year was $1.2 billion, an uplift of approximately $1.5 billion compared to FY '21. FFO was up approximately $39 million or 7.1% on the prior year, driven by an 8% uplift in net property income to $803 million. NPI growth largely reflected the sustained strength of retail sales and improved negotiation outcomes with retailers. This led to lower waivers and provisions in FY '22 and a strong rebound in cash collections, notably in the second half of the year. Pleasingly, improved cash collection outcomes were achieved despite a high proportion of the portfolio being subject to lockdown in FY '22. Supportive retail trading conditions as well as our rigorous focus on debt collection also enabled a $63 million reversal of prior year waivers and provisions, which increased $11 million since the first half. NPI also benefited from growth in base rents and the continued recovery in ancillary income. Outside of NPI, external management fees increased as we ramped up our development projects and net corporate overheads and net interest expense increased mainly due to one-off items in the prior year. Due to the higher volume of leasing activity and a catch-up on previously deferred maintenance CapEx, FY '22 AFFO capital increased by $28 million. The FY '22 distribution per security of $0.104 reflects an AFFO payout ratio of approximately 95%. Turning now to Slide 18. For the 6 months to 30 June 2022, the portfolio delivered a net valuation increase of $233 million or 1.6%. Combined with the first half net valuation gain, the gain for the full year totaled $554 million or 3.9%. Positive valuation outcomes for this half were recorded across all center type and state, while the weighted average cap rate tightened by 5 basis points to 5.3%. The majority of the valuation increase was attributable to income growth. Our subregional and neighborhood portfolios recorded the strongest growth, highlighting the continued resilience of nondiscretionary-based retail and investor appetite for these types of assets. Outlet assets again saw solid valuation gains, which is almost entirely driven by income growth. The value of our CBD portfolio remained steady this period, which, considering the continued impact of the pandemic from CBDs more broadly, was a pleasing outcome. While CBD traffic remains below pre-COVID levels, leasing activity is robust, and we are confident in the ongoing recovery of our premium CBD centers. Turning to Slide 19 and our capital structure. FY '22 was an active year from a capital management perspective. We successfully issued a 6-year $300 million inaugural Green Bond. We extended $475 million of bank debt after FY '28, and we optimized our liquidity through the cancellation of $800 million of bank debt. Our capital management activity in the year further strengthened our balance sheet. Our weighted average maturity is 4.8 years. We have increased diversity of our funding, and we have no debt maturities until FY '24. Gearing of 25.1% is at the low end of our 25% to 35% target range, and we have $1.4 billion of available liquidity. Our consistently prudent approach to managing our capital structure underpinned our approach to hedging. We are currently 85% hedged and have hedged 80% of our expected drawn debt for FY '23, with a very modest step down in FY '24. These relatively high hedging levels provide us with increased certainty in a volatile interest rate environment. Finally, we retained our strong investment-grade credit ratings of A and A2 with Standard and Poor's and Moody's, respectively, both with a stable outlook. I'll now pass back to Grant.

Grant Kelley

executive
#5

Thank you, Adrian. Turning now to Slide 21, and sustainability is fundamental to the successful execution of our strategy and the long-term performance of our business. During FY '22, we strengthened a number of our sustainability credentials, and our approach continues to be anchored by our objective of driving shared value for all stakeholders. Once again, Vicinity improved its ranking on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index from 7th to 5th. We are also ranked Oceania sector leader and #3 globally in the listed retail shopping center category by Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark, or GRESB. We published our Second Modern Slavery statement as well as our Second Innovate Reconciliation Action Plan. We were listed in the top 50 giving large list, and we became a supporter of the task force on climate-related financial disclosure. We continue to make good progress towards our net zero carbon target by 2030 and installed another 3 solar arrays in our industry-leading solar investment program. And finally, as Adrian mentioned, we leveraged our strong sustainability credentials and investment in sustainability to date by completing our first Green Bond. Turning now to Slide 22 and, in summary, FY '22 was a year of recovery and progress at Vicinity. Our results highlight strong operational and financial execution in a recovering retail landscape, where consumers continue to show confidence and capacity to spend and retailer confidence was overall robust. Our results also demonstrate that Vicinity remains the partner of choice for retailers who are looking for opportunities to grow. And as we look ahead, we will continue to invest in our portfolio of assets to drive mutual growth for both landlord and tenant. We have demonstrated our willingness to recycle capital from well-optimized assets into higher growth assets with the acquisition of Harbour Town and the subsequent sale of Runaway Bay, which collectively delivered earnings accretion in FY '22. Our development pipeline represents an exciting phase of growth for Vicinity, and we have a number of important retail and mixed-use projects commencing in the coming year. Our flexible balance sheet is a source of strength and competitive advantage. We take a prudent approach to financial stewardship, where capital allocation is anchored by the maintenance of our credit ratings and focus on paying distributions. As described earlier, while we are mindful of inflation and rising interest rates, we are still seeing elevated retail sales trends in our centers, and we cautiously anticipate a soft landing for the Australian retail sector. Nevertheless, we will continue to provide highly targeted support to retail partners who continue to be impacted by the pandemic, notably SMEs and CBD retailers. And at the same time, we'll actively partner with retailers looking to expand in our centers to drive mutual growth for both tenant and landlord. And finally, to our earnings guidance FY '23, and providing there is no material deterioration in existing economic and COVID-related conditions, our expectation is that FFO per security for FY '23 will be in the range of $0.130 to $0.136, with AFFO per security in the range of $0.109 to $0.115 and distributions in the target range of 95% to 100% of AFFO. Importantly, adjusting for waivers and provisions written back in FY '22, our FFO per security guidance for FY '23 represents between 10% and 15% growth. Against the backdrop of retail sector resilience, we enter FY '23 with confidence in our continued recovery and strategic execution across our core retail operations, retail and mixed-use development projects and our funds management business. Thank you. And with that, we are happy to take any questions.

Operator

operator
#6

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from James Druce with CLSA.

James Druce

analyst
#7

Can you hear me?

Grant Kelley

executive
#8

Yes, we can, Lee -- sorry, James. Over to you.

James Druce

analyst
#9

Yes, so just on the stabilized net property income number, where does that sit now?

Adrian Chye

executive
#10

Yes, James, I might take that. I think the way to think about maybe a stabilized NPI is to think about the FY '22 number and then adjust for probably the COVID impacts. So there's the $63 million, I think, that we have provided in terms of write-back and then the $94 million of waivers and provisions. And then I think on top of that, you probably want to be thinking about ancillary income in the year. We're probably still about 15% down on ancillary income. So if you take those things, you'll probably get to a kind of normalized NPI number.

James Druce

analyst
#11

Okay. And do you mind just reminding me where ancillary income, what was sort of order of magnitude that is?

Adrian Chye

executive
#12

Yes, it's about $105 million on a stabilized basis. For FY '22, we were at about $88 million.

James Druce

analyst
#13

Okay. That makes sense. And in your prepared remarks, it sounded like for the CBD retail assets, the day shopper had replaced the mid -- sort of the drop in traffic from people coming to CBD. Is that what's happened there?

Peter Huddle

executive
#14

James, it's Peter. What we said in the commentary is that particularly on weekends and Melbourne and to a lesser degree, Sydney is the day shoppers are coming back to essentially they're about the same numbers as precured levels. The situation with the CBD is midweek traffic is still substantially below 2019, but weekend traffic is heading towards more normalized numbers that we would expect.

James Druce

analyst
#15

Okay. Yes, that makes sense. And then just maybe in your guidance, we've seen leasing spreads, the second half, I think, was sort of negative 3%. The outlook for that is for FY '23. There's a bit of uncertainty around, but where do you see that trending? Can that continue to tighten? Or have we sort of maxed out that number?

Peter Huddle

executive
#16

Joe, it's hard to forecast. So all we can say is that essentially, it's been a positive momentum in terms of leasing spreads over the last 3 reporting periods. So we're seeing good growth in leasing activity, good retailer demand, more positive leasing spreads than obviously in the pandemic period. And subject to where sales end up, we'd hope that, that would continue.

Adrian Chye

executive
#17

And I think, for the guidance purposes, James, what we're assuming in that guidance is a continuation of that positive trend, probably reflecting the leasing spreads that you're seeing second half of the year.

James Druce

analyst
#18

Okay. That makes sense. And then -- for FY '23? Do we have a number for that?

Adrian Chye

executive
#19

Yes. Look, I think we are still expecting to be providing target rent relief, particularly to our CBD, SME retailers as required. I would be expecting probably a similar level in '23 as we provided for the second half of '22, which is around $30 million.

Operator

operator
#20

Your next question comes from Lou Pirenc with Jarden.

Lourens Pirenc

analyst
#21

Can I just follow up on that? Did you say that the waivers and provisions were still $30 million in the second half? Because I thought you were at 96 million for the first half and you're 93 for the full year. So how do I reconcile that?

Adrian Chye

executive
#22

Yes. That's right. So I think the good way to think about that is 96, which we said at the half year, we then provided or we've provided, I guess, in terms of waivers and provisions another 30. The FY '20 so the half year, we're probably retack about $30 million, so that's offset that amount. So that's probably giving you a flat outcome on a full year basis.

Lourens Pirenc

analyst
#23

Okay. Then also, I mean, with what's happening here in terms of you're quite positive on ancillary income, clearly, fixed rental growth. Your re-leasing spreads are improving. What are the negatives here to only get to that 1.5% or so growth, FFO growth in the mid-range. Is it just cost of debt? Or should we expect any big increases in overheads or drops in external management fees?

Grant Kelley

executive
#24

Yes. Lou, it's Grant here. There's a lot of moving pieces in guidance, probably even more than the 3 or 4 that you just mentioned. I think it reflects overall a balanced view of the potential ups and downs that could eventuate. One of the keys that Adrian touched on is we're not assuming any write-backs but we do have, of course, watching brief, I suppose you could call it, on the macro environment. So it's a fairly complex guidance equation. Happy to go into that perhaps off-line. But I think beyond our remarks today, it's probably appropriate to leave it at that for the moment.

Operator

operator
#25

Your next question comes from Stuart McLean with Macquarie.

Stuart McLean

analyst
#26

First question is just on the rental relief you're expecting to move forward into FY '23 for CBD office foot traffic doesn't appear to be improving substantially. Is this just a new normal number you'd expect to come through and be hitting the P&L on a go-forward basis? Or do you genuinely think that we can move past this rent relief concept for CBD assets at some stage down the track?

Peter Huddle

executive
#27

Stuart, it's Peter. Look, we are strong believers in the mid- to long-term CBD assets. So I don't think it's a new normal number that's going in, but clearly, we're still in recovery with CBDs. International borders have only just recently opened. The SME Code is only expired essentially in March with mediation really only expired in June. And so from our point of view, we've provided some targeted assistance, particularly for SME retailers in our CBDs to -- there are quality retailers -- to hold that tenant mix together as we start to build traffic. From our position, we expect more normalized traffic to occur in the CBDs around FY '24, and that's why we're guiding for additional assistance there for FY '23.

Stuart McLean

analyst
#28

Okay. And second question is just on development. Can you just talk to the returns that you're expecting to achieve at the Chatswood development? And so for the major development, just not the kind of more minor portion that's going to kick off this year as well as, at Galleria, what's the spend and the targeted return?

Peter Huddle

executive
#29

Stuart, look, we haven't given specific guidance in terms of the returns of either developments. I might have a chat to you with reference to the development showcase that we did in June, which we gave some guidance on classifications for retail categories. But generally, on our retail projects, our stabilized yields are around about 6% with IRRs that are closer to 9% to 10% for retail. And that would cover essentially both of those developments that you would -- you just spoke about. But clearly, the Chatswood development, what we're planning to commence this year is a smaller CapEx development. And it's in the range of about $30 million to $40 million from VCX dollars and has about those type of return hurdles to them. That really prepares the center for the larger development, which we plan to commence in FY '24.

Stuart McLean

analyst
#30

Okay. So both of those work at that 6% return expectation?

Peter Huddle

executive
#31

Broadly.

Stuart McLean

analyst
#32

Okay. And then just on those as well. Is there any downtime from developments that we need to be thinking about for FY '23 earnings? And how do we think about that into FY '24 as well if the major Chatswood development starts coming on, please?

Adrian Chye

executive
#33

Yes. I might take that one. FY '23 loss of ramp is probably in the $10 million to $15 million level, which is still lower than probably our typical level of lost ramps. Just given the nature of the projects, Chadstone in particular, we're not expecting to lose a whole lot with the entertainment and leisure precinct development currently on at the moment. FY '24 would tick up a little bit. So I'd be expecting something probably in the $20 million to $25 million mark in terms of loss of rent.

Stuart McLean

analyst
#34

Just one follow-up there. The $10 million to $15 million you expect in '23, what's in the base in FY '22? Is there already a number kind of in the base of $10 million to $15 million limited delta?

Adrian Chye

executive
#35

That's right. Very similar number for '22.

Stuart McLean

analyst
#36

Okay, fantastic. And just a final one for me. Just maintenance CapEx and tenant incentives came at the bottom end of your range, $100 million to $110 million. Looks like guidance assumes $100 million again. Can you just talk to how you're thinking about that line item on a go-forward basis, please?

Adrian Chye

executive
#37

Yes. Look, I think there's 2 components, obviously, maintenance CapEx. I think there was a bit of catch-up capital that we assumed would come through. We've probably been a little bit more judicious, I think, around maintenance CapEx and really focus the expenditure, and that's why that's come down a little bit. And we're expecting that subject to cost increases, et cetera. But we expect that to be around the $50 million mark next year as well and probably on a normalized basis. In relation to incentives, I think what you've seen in the result is a very strong retention rate. So that's also led to a slight reduction in our expectation earlier in the year. And we're expecting that level going forward as well, assuming that the continued strong operating conditions.

Operator

operator
#38

Your next question comes from Grant McCasker with UBS.

Grant McCasker

analyst
#39

Just a question on the leasing. I think holdover seem to have ticked up to around 9%. Is that development impacted? Or any sort of further information you can provide on that?

Peter Huddle

executive
#40

Grant, it's Peter. So essentially, 9% in the appendix there, that includes all deals, include some office deals, includes deals that we haven't documented yet but they've been agreed. So probably the real number to think about, which is the trend of number we go through is about 10% of leases in hold average. It's about 7.3% of rent. And if you -- if we trended that against prior results, it's broadly similar, if not slightly better than about the last 3 years. So we can go through it in more detail, maybe offline, Grant, but that's holdouts in reasonably good shape. About 33% of them are held over on behalf of the synergies. So in other words, holdovers that we want to have vacant possession for in the short term for development activity.

Grant McCasker

analyst
#41

Okay. Great. And then if we just look at the occupancy, so that occupancy includes temp leasing. Have you been able to -- maybe can you just outline what is the percent is in temporary leasing at the moment? And have you been able to convert more on a permanent basis over the last 6 months and the improved trading conditions?

Peter Huddle

executive
#42

Yes. Grant, just the way that we measure occupancy, we don't include temp leasing. So we -- so essentially, it's all holdovers and it's all permanent leasing, but it doesn't include temp leasing.

Grant McCasker

analyst
#43

Okay. Great. And then just final one, just on luxury precincts. Obviously, you've had a very strong period. Is there any sort of -- are you able to call out? Is there an normally high period income from turnover sales this period that we should be considering?

Peter Huddle

executive
#44

So this is not abnormal, but clearly, luxury is a really important category for us, and we're pretty proud to be a good partner of luxury retail. We're growing with them at Chadstone, QueensPlaza and the materially progressed luxury discussions around Chatswood Chase as well. So for us, the luxury stores are getting larger in their stores. So having a full range offer coming in. Their sales performance has been exceptional and there is percentage rent that's flowing through. There has been some percentage rents flowing through the numbers relative to luxury. Maybe we will deal with that number sort of offline, but there is some percentage rent flowing through from luxury into the numbers that we reported for FY '22.

Operator

operator
#45

Next question comes from Simon Chan with Morgan Stanley.

Simon Chan

analyst
#46

Grant, in your opening remarks, you mentioned about Dave McNamara joining to bolster your funds management aspirations. Can you perhaps give us a bit of an update as to your aspirations there and how it's all tracking and what initiatives you may be working on?

Grant Kelley

executive
#47

Yes, Simon, thanks. Look, we won't give specific comments regarding any specific opportunities as we typically would not. But I think David has made a very strong start. As you've mentioned, we've been very clear for probably about 4 years now on our appetite to rebuild that capability, and David's one of the very best people in that industry. So that was, I think, enormous benefit to us. To date, a lot of his energies have been focused on, in particular, the roughly 1/3 of our AUM, which is spoken for by joint venture partners and he's done a wonderful job on that. And as I mentioned, there are other opportunities that we actively look at periodically, but we won't make any further comment on those at this point.

Simon Chan

analyst
#48

Okay. That's fine. On leasing spreads, negative 4.8%. Just wondering, Peter, you could give us some insights as to what's the range of numbers you were getting? Like how is CBDs coming in? And how were DFOs coming in, et cetera?

Peter Huddle

executive
#49

Simon, I think, part of the negative leasing spread -- part of the result of the leasing spread is pretty much influenced by the apparel category. So really strong apparel sales, particularly in the first half of this calendar year. And that's really driven a positive leasing spread for apparel across the portfolio. And considering the amount of weight that apparel has across all categories in the portfolio, that led to a better outcome. And then the DFO as a category in itself has positive leasing spreads. So we're about 1.5% across the DFO portfolio. So -- and that's also has driven positive leasing spread, has probably also driven because there's less capital goes into the DFO portfolio, probably a lower leasing capital incentive for the total year. In terms of the CBD, the CBD isn't too bad, we're negative, but not -- we're around about 2.5% to 3% negative on the CBDs for leasing spread. And primarily it reflects -- and we mentioned this in the commentary is a lot of retailers are looking to position themselves in the CBDs. We're writing longer-term leases, making sure we get those flagship tenancies in our CBD locations. QueensPlaza, in particular, has been a huge growth opportunity for luxury. And so the spreads have been better in CBDs than the average.

Operator

operator
#50

The next question comes from Richard Jones of JPMorgan.

Richard Jones

analyst
#51

Just wondering, Grant, or Adrian, if you could just clarify just in terms of the assumptions that they were using in relation to stabilized income relative to your own expectations?

Adrian Chye

executive
#52

Yes, I'm happy to take that one. Look, I would say for the majority of valuations now, particularly the non-CBD valuations, what value is having their assumptions going forward is a stabilized view. It's probably where the CBD -- with the CBD assets, that's where there's probably a bit of allowance there still in the valuations of about $30 million to $40 million, which will roll off, I think, when those assets stabilize. And I think their assumptions are similar to ours, around a 2- to 3-year ramp-up in CBDs, so '24, '25, but that's probably the only adjustment. Probably the minor piece, which I mentioned earlier, is around ancillary income. But that's spread across all the assets, and that's pretty minor in the scheme of things.

Operator

operator
#53

SP1 Your next question comes from Sholto Maconochie with Jefferies.

Sholto Maconochie

analyst
#54

Grant, just if you look at the results, it was beat to your guidance. It looks like you released about $11 million of conversions in the second half to get that beat. And then just on the outlook, the guidance, if you look at it at the midpoint, is a bit soft, but it's sort of in line at the high point. What are the swing factors? You've talked to the sort of the rent relief $30 million for CBDs, the leasing spread improving. But it seems that your cost of debt is pretty conservative, the BBSW 3.25% for the full year. What are the sort of swing factors that you include in guidance to sort of elaborate on, please?

Grant Kelley

executive
#55

Yes. Sure, Sholto. Just on the discussion regarding the write-backs, I think we're fairly clear on the $63 million that was written back. And obviously, we called that out in the ASX press release, particularly the 10% to 15% growth. So hopefully, that was relatively straightforward in terms of FY '22. In terms of FY '23, look, overall, we've assumed really a continuation of retail sector resilience in a nutshell. What that translates to is, as Peter described, the buoyancy of leasing for the second half continues. The cash collections, that strong low- to mid-90% continues. The waivers and provisions, as Adrian talked about earlier, are approximately $30 million, but that does not connote or anticipate write-back. So that's actually, I think, an exercise in prudence. And as we talked about, continued recovery of ancillary income and fees. Look, on [ WACC D ], it's a really good point. I think we have borne the upside and downside of being among the more hedged books certainly in the A-REIT and probably more broadly in the ASX. That is a very deliberate choice. So that 4% is in fact a number that is incredibly robust because it actually is an 85% hedging ratio at the end of the financial year and 80% this coming financial year if we were to make no further interest rate swaps. So that number is, we think, incredibly robust. I'd contrast that to an approach whereby you go unhedged. You have guidance around a [ WACC D ] that's maybe a little more appealing, perhaps in terms of the headline number, but actually is not as concrete as our 85% hedged number. So hopefully, that clarifies. I don't know if there's any follow-up on any of those points, but happy to go into any of them.

Sholto Maconochie

analyst
#56

No, that makes sense. Just gets conservative on the BBSW there on your guidance. Then just on the sort of outlook, I think you're talking to strong second half, we should expect given the momentum you're carrying in from the second half '22. But if you look at the consumer, we haven't really seen a big impact in -- from rising rate, negative from house prices. So the second half could a bit softer from both the sales and leasing spread perspective because you're already seeing some retailers in super retail calling out today, we're expecting softer conditions in second half '23. So what's your sort of -- is that sort of backed into your guidance too? Is it at such a wide range?

Grant Kelley

executive
#57

Yes. I mean, we forecast from a granular bottom-up level, category by category, as Peter talked about earlier. Look, what I've noticed that leaving aside our internal forecasting, if you -- but first, the ABS numbers, which came out last week, you had an interesting sort of sales volume number of about 1.4% seasonally adjusted. But what was most interesting to me was the categories were almost exactly the same as what we described today in terms of their increase. So CapEx and restaurants, I think, were between 8% to 9% and clothing and apparel about 4%. So I think what you're probably seeing is a transition to the living with COVID economy, if you will, in which direct-to-consumer products are once again in vogue and there is significant consumption around the categories that we have highlighted in terms of our summary today.

Sholto Maconochie

analyst
#58

And then just a more long final question. You've got the CBD assistance you're providing, which is good. But I mean if you look at office occupancy, it's -- the norm is probably 3 to 4 days a week and 4 to 5 days at Jefferies here. But it's still 3 to 4 days is sort of the new norm and there's peaks and troughs in extra weekend. But if you look one of your peers that off costs sort of CBD asset of around 47% and productivity and sales, and it was a transport-related asset. But does it mean longer term that the rents in particularly cafes and some of those service space ones that will have to come down on longer term. But is there any so much assistance you can keep picking can on the road to provide. Is that sort of worried later that the CBD assets will have to be marked down in rents if traffic never recovers.

Grant Kelley

executive
#59

Maybe I'll ask Peter to answer that just in terms of the specific tenancies and then I might have a couple of quick comments on the office sector in CBDs. But Peter, do you want to handle the question on the specific tenancies?

Peter Huddle

executive
#60

Firstly, I'm glad Sholto you are there 5 days a week. Look, it's clearly a watching point. I think what's occurring in the CBDs and how we're positioned to CBDs for the last couple of years is making sure that our assets are the premier assets in the CBDs. There is some vacancy in the CBDs. If you look at all the agency report, a lot of the vacancies is in the street frontages. So what we've been focused on is retailers are looking to consolidate. They might have multiple stores in the CBD. They want to go to back to flagship stores. And so from our point of view, there is a structural change occurring within the CBD office works. That's our personal -- that's Vicinity's view and that we want to be in a position that we have those targeted flagship retailers or first-to-market retailers that can't be found necessarily in the suburbs and they're looking to consolidate in the CBDs and we're looking to sign them on longer-term leases. So what occurs in CBDs in 3, 4, 5 years, I think is -- still requires a bit of a crystal ball to be honest, but that's our approach. So I may not have answered your question 100%...

Sholto Maconochie

analyst
#61

No, it's -- I know it's a tough one.

Peter Huddle

executive
#62

And maybe just to that summary on the retail side. I mean, I think in terms of our mixed-use pipeline, Sholto, it's quite deliberate, and you saw this. The development showcase that we've targeted essentially distributed, if you will, suburban locations for our office build-out and the pre-commits have been fantastic as you saw with Officeworks at Chadstone and Hub at Box Hill. So yes, we do have a single relatively small floor play that we will be converting 2 offices, as we described to you at Emporium in Melbourne in the coming 12 to 24 months. But that aside, the vast majority of our office build-out is in distributed locations, which will take advantage of the work-near-home trend that we think is quite possibly a strong trend line that we need to flex into. The other quick comment I'd make is, if we're wrong on this, the beauty of our business model is that we actually, as Peter pointed out, own the land. So we have the ability to actually flex out of something that may appear to be not attracted to the market at a given point despite the best planning. And I think that's a massive upside for us versus others is our mixed-use pipeline has an ability through essentially our capital structure and our ownership of the land of the air rights to respond dynamically to market changes.

Operator

operator
#63

Your next question comes from Ben Brayshaw with Barrenjoey.

Benjamin Brayshaw

analyst
#64

I just have a question in relation to Chadstone. I was wondering if you could talk broadly, perhaps a question for Peter. Just around visitation levels and high-level observations about how total sales compared with prepandemic? And finally, just around specialty occupancy costs, any high-level observations you could share around how close that asset is to being stabilized.

Peter Huddle

executive
#65

Ben, yes, no Chadstone has been really interesting. I mean, clearly, significantly impacted by the pandemic over multiple different financial years now, including the one that's just passed with the Victorian lockdown. So from a traffic point of view, across the entire year, Chadstone basically was in the low 70s in terms of 2019 traffic, but you've got to take into consideration that it was materially impacted for 3 months as a result of that. Despite it being in the low 70s, it almost returned to 2019 MAT numbers, which was quite an extraordinary outcome. Some of that is obviously driven by the really strong performance of luxury sales at Chadstone by getting -- essentially, we finished the year close to $2.1 billion in sales, which is close to where it was in 2019. From an occupancy cost number, we actually don't report it. We don't -- we think it essentially -- I know others have, but we think it essentially confuses the market because occupancy of a full year over a 3.5 year sales is hard to trend or make sense. So we actually don't move that into the marketplace from a reporting point of view. When we get to a position where we have a full normalized year of occupancy, again, we will revert back to normal practices.

Operator

operator
#66

Your next question comes from Alex Prineas with Morningstar.

Alexander Prineas

analyst
#67

Just wondering, it's very interesting to see the strong spend per visit numbers about sort of holding about 30% above 2019 levels. I think you've sort of touched on it a bit, but can you comment further on how consistent that higher spend per visit is across different store categories and retail sites? Is it fairly evenly spread?

Grant Kelley

executive
#68

Yes. The short answer is yes, Alex. It's remarkably evenly spread by format. We have seen spikes in CBD, as Peter touched on earlier. But the trend line here is really the relevant point, I suppose, is purposeful shopping. So the key metric from our perspective, clearly is, as a landlord, the sales volume that our tenants derive. And if they get that through essentially a higher average spend, that's okay with us. So obviously, while we hope footfall will recover to pre-COVID and surpass them as we grow, the reality is that, from a sales perspective, our numbers have remained extraordinarily robust actually, driven by this very high spend per visit.

Operator

operator
#69

Next question comes from Louise Sandberg with Bank of America.

Louise Sandberg

analyst
#70

Just wondering, you have elevated retail sales across the centers, but obviously weak outlook for consumer confidence. How much visibility do you have on leasing trends? I mean I assume the leasing for the first half would be more or less complete by now.

Peter Huddle

executive
#71

So essentially, we typically commence those discussions about 6 months out from lease expiry, and it's normally a reasonably good negotiation. What I can say is we did carry good momentum through into July in terms of leasing activities since we've closed out July with our -- we won't release July's numbers, but they're broadly similar to what we ended up in FY '22. So -- and hence, the reason in our guidance is basically saying broadly similar leasing spreads for FY '23 as FY '22 would be our guide to that at this point subject to -- and again, like everything is subject to sort of a midterm forecast in terms of sales environment.

Louise Sandberg

analyst
#72

And are you seeing any change in the structure of leases? You mentioned longer leases in the CBD, but anything else? We've heard people mention caps on sort of rents or occupancy costs and things like that on license. Are you seeing any of that?

Peter Huddle

executive
#73

Yes, Louise. Look, to be honest, I mean, it was a significant discussion at the start of the pandemic in terms of the structure of the leases. We've been really resolute to hold our triple net lease. I think it's been the right decision. We are -- and so there is minimal cap rent deals in our 7,000 leases. It's less than 150. And when they come up for expiry, we convert them to essentially triple net leases. Particularly our lease structure is a flat percentage increase. We've got 94% of leases above 4% annual growth on a net lease. And then in a rising inflation environment, we recover 50% of actual costs passed through and outgoing. So I think our lease structures fit for purpose for the current environment.

Louise Sandberg

analyst
#74

And just in terms of recycling assets, as you did this year, is there still -- what's the market like in terms of potential buyers for mall assets for fiscal interest? Or has that slowed down a lot?

Grant Kelley

executive
#75

Louise, I think -- it's Grant here. I think as we touched on in the valuation summary. The comparable transactions pool has definitely slowed. So ironically, I don't think we're seeing that, candidly, in terms of the opportunities that are being brought to us from intermediaries such as banks and brokers and the like. But I think the absence of transaction evidence for the valuer is probably is an interesting data point. Look, I think overall, we obviously always stand ready to deploy capital in the best risk-adjusted fashion. And consequently, we will react opportunistically should we see really compelling opportunities such as we saw on the Gold Coast with Harbour Town. But we're also incredibly discerning about our cost of capital and ensuring that all acquisitions are both strategic and quickly accretive. So I hope that answers that question for you.

Louise Sandberg

analyst
#76

And I guess, on the other hand, just in terms of capital management, your discount to book has narrowed, although the book has grown there.

Grant Kelley

executive
#77

Yes. Look, obviously, the gap to NTA has hovered between 5% to sort of 15%, perhaps say, in the last little while. I think we never obviously comment on the gap to NTA. That's a market decision. We obviously are focused day in, day out on maximizing return. But obviously, we do look at NTA in terms of actually reflecting what we think fair value is.

Operator

operator
#78

There are no further questions at this time. I'll now hand back to Mr. Kelley for closing remarks.

Grant Kelley

executive
#79

Great. Thank you, Rachel. And look, just to thank everybody for their participation on the call today. we trust it was informative, and we look forward to seeing many of you in the coming days and weeks. But thank you once again for your time this morning.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Vicinity Centres transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Vicinity Centres earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.