Vistry Group PLC (VTY) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

July 20, 2023

London Stock Exchange GB Consumer Discretionary Household Durables trading_statement 29 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator

operator
#1

Good day, and welcome to Vistry PLC Trading Update Conference Call. My name is Priscilla, and I will be your coordinator for today's event. Please note this call is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] I will now hand you over you to your host, Mr. Gregory Fitzgerald, to the -- the CEO, to begin today's conference. Please go ahead, sir. Thank you.

Gerald Fitzgerald

executive
#2

Okay. Thank you, Priscilla. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for joining us. I'm here today with Earl Sibley, Chief Operating Officer; and Timothy Lawlor, Chief Finance Officer. So this morning, we've issued a trading update for the 6 months to 30th of June. And we will, of course, publish our half-year results on September, the 11. So let me give you the key highlights and then we'll be happy to take any questions you might have. So starting with, it was a good first half performance, with the group trading in line with our expectations. The integration of Countryside, creating the leading partnerships business in the country, under the Countryside Partnerships name has gone extremely well, better than planned. We quickly established the new operational structure for the group, allowing us to focus on increasing the supply of affordable mixed tenure homes to the market and driving industry-leading return on capital employed. Culturally, the businesses have come together very well. We've taken the best of both, really treated it as a merger and continue to drive best practice, shared learning and cost efficiencies across the group. As a result, we are on track to at least deliver our synergy target of GBP 25 million for this year with a full run rate of at least GBP 60 million by the end of the 2024. Partnerships is demonstrating its resilience. Mixed tenure completions were up 6% in the period on pro forma half 1 '22. Partnerships adjusted half 1 revenue is expected to be circa GBP 930 million, and we are well on track to deliver revenue growth in the full year against the GBP 2 billion pro forma 2022, again, proving the resilience of the Partnerships business, which is why we bought Countryside. Our partnership model, pre-sales a minimum of 50% of units on each development and it is significantly less reliant on the open market. Demand from housing associations and local authorities for affordable mixed tenure homes remains strong. Given the more challenging private sales market, our Partnerships business is looking to increase the percentage of presale beyond the minimum of 50%. It is very well placed to do given the strength of relationships and track record of delivery with housing associations and local authorities. Partnerships has a strong forward order book with 80% of forecast mixed tenure units secured and all partner delivery revenue secured, and 80% is a strong place to be in my experience of 40 years in Housebuilding. Housebuilding has faced more challenging market conditions in the period with the higher mortgage rate environment and broader macroeconomic challenges particularly impacting on first-time buyers. The business delivered 2,847 completions in the first half, down 22% on pro forma half 1 '22. Housebuilding has and continues to mitigate the fall in open market demand with both transactions as part of the Vistry Group, it is well positioned to do this with our relationships through the Partnerships business. These bulk transactions have supported the sales rate and helped hold firm on private sales prices whilst assisting with subcontract savings and managing -- our management of preliminary costs. Housebuilding's forward order book totals GBP 1.2 billion, with again an encouraging 76% of forecast 2023 units secured. The business has put in place tight working controls environment and is expected year-on-year a reduction in completions for housebuilding and that's reflected in our build rate. The group recently secured a further GBP 67 million of grant funding from Homes England under their affordable homes program that runs through to 2026. And in addition to the initial GBP 83 million allocated, so that's about GBP 150 million -- GBP 140-odd million in grant, and we're the only Housebuilder in the country, getting grant direct from Homes England. In total, this will enable Vistry to deliver around 2,400 affordable housing partnerships with housing associations and local authorities, a USP for us. This funding was instrumental to the formation of our Partnerships with Sage Homes, where through Sage's new home Stepper shared ownership model, this [ street ] will deliver an initial portfolio of 800 shared ownership homes. The scheme, which has only been going for the last couple of months, has had a very encouraging start with strong customer interest and over 60 vetted reservations since its launched last month, and that's through Housebuilding and Partnerships. On costs, as an enlarged group, we are benefiting from our revised arrangement with our supply chain partners. The greater visibility of revenues within partnerships and through these bulk deals gives us a competitive advantage, in particular with subcontractors. We offset cost increases in the first half and expect to be -- and expect that to be the case for the full year with some opportunity to improve on this. I honestly feel there will be deflation in the second half of this year as all major housebuilders cut back on land, planning issues, small housebuilders are cutting back dramatically on work in progress levels. And at some point, I believe in the next 2 months, there will be a stream of subcontractors knocking on the door for where we can do better deals than we have done over the last 2.5 years and the subcontractors and suppliers start off at a higher level. So there's plenty to go for there. Net debt was circa GBP 330 million as at 30th of June, and we expect this to decrease to around GBP 150 million at December. The Board is committed to retaining a strong balance sheet, and we will update on capital allocation, as we said for a number of months now, with our half year results in September as the Board concludes their review, which is going well. So finishing off then on outlook, we have seen a slowdown in open market private sales over the last 4 weeks following the rise in the bank rate and mortgage costs. That said, this week, which is the first week where we've just now had an announcement that inflation is lower than expected, looks to be encouraging. And we had a weekend that was as good as we had at any time during the year. So only a week, but encouraging. Housebuilding Partnerships are both mitigating any slowdown in sales through bulk transactions. Both businesses have historically strong forward sale positions for the year. We are on -- we have a very firm focus on cost and the synergy benefits are at least on track to what we've been stating. As such, the Board continues to expect the group to deliver at least GBP 450 million adjusted profit tax for the year. So on that upbeat note, we'll take any questions, Priscilla?

Operator

operator
#3

[Operator Instructions] We will now take our first question from Aynsley Lammin from Investec.

Gerald Fitzgerald

executive
#4

Ansley. We can hear you.

Aynsley Lammin

analyst
#5

Just two questions from me, please. First, just on the kind of recent trade in the sales rate, if you could give a bit more color and indication of where you've seen them slow to over the last 4 weeks. And on the pricing front, how resilient that's been, have you used more incentives, just your feel for the market given the higher interest rate environment. And then just on net debt, I think that was a bit higher than what I had -- kind of had in the model, any thoughts around why that was higher in the end of June? And what's driving that for the full year as well as the outcome?

Gerald Fitzgerald

executive
#6

So Tim will answer the question on net debt. But what I would say is that's lower than our expectations at the half year, that number. With regards to sales over the last 4 or 5 weeks, I would say, private sales, as I say, we're making it up with bulk have been around 20% back down on where they were in April and May, although part of that, there's always a slowdown in June. June is not as good as April and May, and a lot of our sales teams are obviously concentrating as they will be in the entire sector on either a half year with us or a full year with somebody like Barratt. So about 20% down. Encouragingly, pricing still they're are thereabouts in line with our expectations. So a reduction in sales, I think that will -- it's a forecast. And it's only until tomorrow for this week come through that this will be the first week where we're back on track, and I'm encouraged by the inflation details that came through. So 20%-ish down made up by bulk, but pricing, no real change, we're holding firm. And in fact, the fact that we're doing some bulk, I would rather give some discount on a bulk deal and offer it to Mr. and Mrs. Smith. And so -- because that then impacts mortgage valuations. And that we had all the way through the year and included in the last 4 weeks, no issues with down valuations, I'm pleased to say. So with regards to the debt, I'll hand over to Tim, but I'll just say again, the GBP 330 million was a lot less than we were forecasting.

Timothy Lawlor

executive
#7

It's in line with the average debt that we talked about at the year-end results. And I think there's 3 components to the first half. So in the first half, that's all we've got the payment around dividends going out in the first half year, which is about GBP 110 million, and we also had the fire safety and the integration cost, the integration costs more front-end limited. The second piece is that there has been net land investment in the first half of the year as we've opportunistically secured good land sites in the first half of the year. And the third piece is work in progress, where there's been increased work in progress investment, partly catching up on the end of last year, where there was a slowdown at the end of Q4 last year and partly just the seasonal split, we always say a work in progress, outflow in the first or bigger outflow in the first half of the year than the second linked with the fact that we do more profits and more [indiscernible] in the second half of the year. So that's what takes it down from the half year position to the full year position.

Gerald Fitzgerald

executive
#8

And I still think we came into the year, let's not forget off the back of a disappointing following the disastrous budget last September. October, November, December, the sales cancellation rates were incredibly high. So we entered into the year and had to build up some work in progress over and above where the sales were because it's a little disappointing last quarter. What else would we say on debt? No, I think I said, isn't it?

Aynsley Lammin

analyst
#9

And just one follow-up on land creditors at the end of June?

Timothy Lawlor

executive
#10

Bank credits will be slightly higher than they were at year-end, at the end of June.

Gerald Fitzgerald

executive
#11

But slightly, no great shakes. So we, again, I think, have been a little bit different. My experience in times of uncertainty, which we definitely got at the present moment in time. There are more land opportunities out there. We're not buying any land. Land that we agreed 3 months ago, we're not actually buying it unless we actually renegotiate the terms, but some of the best sites that we've dealt with over the last 20, 30 years have all come from buying in a market like we are at present moment in time. Where an awful lot of people leave or calm down on the land market. So land market at the moment. Fair enough, you've got to make the call. It is a pretty good one to be in, and we are doing some pretty good deals.

Operator

operator
#12

We'll move on to our next participant, Clyde Lewis from Peel Hunt.

Clyde Lewis

analyst
#13

Gregory and Tim. I'm just -- just going to have one from my end, please. Just around the bulk sale. Just sort of -- I think you've sort of flagged sort of all 3 categories in terms of [ HAs ] , [ loan ] authorities and sort of [indiscernible] been part of the sort of customer base, if you like, of the extra bulk sales. How -- can you give us an idea is -- as which one is bigger, which one is sort of becoming more aggressive or are they all the same? I mean be also useful to sort of understand on the bulk payments around the cash flow, just in terms of sort of -- is it very similar to sort of private reservations? Or are you actually getting some upfront payments in terms of completion?

Gerald Fitzgerald

executive
#14

Yes. We're getting them. In financing the deal, we're getting where we basically are with the -- so if we haven't started the plot, we will get the land if we're halfway through, we'll get the land and half of the cost and then the money come through kind of on-stage completions, even in some cases, mostly valuations. So from a cash perspective, it's much better. And that will give equivalent sales, which is one of the reasons why we're pushing up housebuilding sales numbers this year. From an aggressive perspective, I would say probably local authorities and housing associations, not really noticed too much of a difference, maybe PRS maybe slightly, but it's in the margin of a bit more aggressive. And over the first 6 months, I would suggest that the discount has been -- against asking price has been, on average, less just a bit less than 10%. And against the asking price, we've got around 3% as a buffer between asking a forecast. Then you take off the sales and marketing costs, which is typically anywhere between 1.5% and 2.25% which you obviously don't need if you're selling a bulk deal, let's say, over 100 units. We're also noticing that we are also getting subcontractors prepared to sharpen their pens on a site where they were looking at it and sales were not gone as quick as they like. Therefore, we were closing -- not closing, obviously, really controlling, tightly work in progress. If you then speak to the commons in the [indiscernible], the groundworker and say, actually, we're just going to do a deal of 100 units that's guaranteed. That means we'll be cracking on. We're getting some money from them as well to offset it. All I would say is probably the trend of discounts. But interesting to see how things move over the next few weeks with maybe a turnaround on thoughts on where interest rates are going and people sitting on the fence, hence the weekend was very good. But without that, the trend of discounts was moving up as opposed to moving down.

Operator

operator
#15

We will move on to our next participant, Chris Millington from Numis.

Chris Millington

analyst
#16

Just -- got a quick follow-up on Clyde's last question. Can you just talk through as well how the grant funding feeds through to the balance sheet and the P&L? That's the first one I've got. Next one is just really about the breakdown of build costs. I just wonder if you could give us a bit of a feel of the kind of labor and materials components there. And then the final one I've got is whether or not you're considering any other cost savings, [ ex the synergies ] you're driving from the countryside deal. We've obviously heard a few people starting to talk around cost savings and kind of hiring freezes, et cetera. Just curious where you are on that.

Gerald Fitzgerald

executive
#17

Yes. We have an employment raise, so I can say that. That's been in place for probably a couple of weeks. And maybe watch this space, Chris. Obviously, you need to be careful with what you say, but we're not an organization that sits down for too long and just contemplates our navels. So we'll be looking at other areas where we can make cost savings. So -- but back to your first question. I'll put that over to Earl.

Earl Sibley

executive
#18

Yes. Chris, so I mean 2 parts of Grant, our own grant, which I assume is your main question. So the GBP 150 million, which look to be clear is as much as Homes England can offer to any PLC business. So we have got the maximum grant at this point from Homes England. We do get a cash advantage from that grant. So as we effectively start developing and sell on the land for the units. We do get a cash injection from that grant and then we do get further grant as we build and then complete the units. So that will start to come through in terms of the additional grants. There is -- within that grant, we are also supported in terms of our timber frame manufacturer, clearly, which we're doing through our factories and looking to expand. So that grant piece all fits together. Equally, we obviously use other people's grants as well with the deals that we do with the housing associations. And back to Clyde's question earlier, I mean the largest proportion of our bulk sales is with housing associations, albeit demand is strong, particularly from them and the local authorities. Does that answer the question on grants?

Chris Millington

analyst
#19

That's exactly what I was asking. And then just a split on build costs?

Gerald Fitzgerald

executive
#20

Yes, build costs, we -- I think we're seeing around about 5% kind of increase, and it would be more if it wasn't for our revised size on suppliers. We think that's pretty much been 3%, 4% on subcontracted, but I am very confident that's going to grow from subcontractors. And then the reason we've been able to mitigate it in the first half is the rest has come from synergy savings. So we -- and that doesn't mean -- I don't want to sound because I don't know what the other householders are doing. If we hadn't have done the deal and we were just as Vistry, I think we would have been seeing similar levels of inflation, but we have been a deal. We are much bigger, we have been able to renegotiate because our starting point was all of our deals are coming to group deals on materials were coming to an end in December. And we've renegotiated all those on the back of being -- building a lot more houses, which has been very advantageous to us. And I do think we're pretty good on them managing our subcontract, supply chain and have a lot of subcontractors that want to work for us. And they like the partnerships but a subcontractor at the moment that's got half a brain is looking to live to fight another day. And if you've got a site on the left-hand side of the road, which is 1,000 houses, which is private sale and you've got 1 on the right-hand side, which is a partnership scheme, the subcontractor will sharpen his pencil to work on the partnership scheme because he knows he will be finished -- will be doing those 1,000 units as quick as possible, whereas you also know is on the left-hand side, the 1,000 private sales that depends on the open market and there might be WIP restrictions, et cetera, et cetera. So particularly in these times, hence, the resilience of the partnership model, subcontractors will do an awful lot to work on partnership schemes and schemes where you've done a bulk deal and you've got guaranteed work ahead of them.

Operator

operator
#21

[Operator Instructions] Our next participant, Gregor Kuglitsch from UBS.

Gregor Kuglitsch

analyst
#22

Three questions, please. So the first one is on margin. If you could just sort of give us your latest sense perhaps where I think you tend to talk on growth for Housebuilding and sort of operating margin for Partnerships. And I guess it's in the light of the bulk sales, and I guess how all of that sort of flows through, obviously, you should have good visibility at this stage for this year? The second question is on the average debt. I think it was GBP 400 million, I think you were looking at, and I just wanted to confirm that, that's still what you're looking at, at this stage for '23 and perhaps what actually the H1 figure was? And then maybe finally, you've obviously seen one of your couple of peers, I think, already come out with additional fire safety provisions and so on, you obviously decided not to do that. So I just wanted to get your thoughts how comfortable you feel about your position on the provisions regarding fire safety and legacy buildings?

Gerald Fitzgerald

executive
#23

Thanks, Gregor. So Tim will take the margin and average debt ones. But on the fire safety, we're very comfortable with our provision. And as I've said to a number of people, I'm not sure if it's to you, direct, Gregor, our members are very prudent, and we haven't allowed for getting any money back from warranty providers, contractors, subcontractors, insurances. And I'm expecting that number to be relatively substantial, and we are bonusing our teams accordingly. So yes, our number is absolutely fine. We've spent GBP 20 million, GBP 25 million in the first half of the year, and we expect that to rise to an overall GBP 50 million to GBP 60 million, all as planned in the second half of the year. But at the moment, with our portfolio, and it's being looked at by different teams because Countryside have come into -- Countryside have challenged Vistry, Vistry have challenged Countryside. We feel very resilient with those numbers. So Tim, margin average debt.

Timothy Lawlor

executive
#24

So first of all, in terms of margin, Partnerships margin is holding firm as no change in the Partnerships margin on Housebuilding because of the shift to bulk, the proportion of bulk is probably up by sort of 10%. So overall units up about 10% on where we were, but profits remaining the same. So obviously, there's a margin impact there. We're still expecting our gross margin to be in excess of 20% for the full year. In terms of average debt, yes, H1 was around GBP 400 million average month in net debt, and we're expecting a similar sort of level for the full year.

Operator

operator
#25

We'll move on with our next participant, Anthony Manning from Bank of America.

Anthony Manning

analyst
#26

Just a quick one on me on the Partnerships. So I know you've talked about the kind of 10% growth going forward. Should we think about that as kind of an average over the cycle? Or are you still confident that 10% in '24. And I guess, added on to that, what are the biggest headwinds to get over to achieve that? Is it just a demand or availability of land or subcontractors, could it even be greater than that if the demand is there for this moment of time?

Gerald Fitzgerald

executive
#27

Yes. Well, the demand is absolutely there, Anthony. Yes, land, subcontractors are all constraints, but people, actually bringing in people into our organization is probably the biggest single constraint. So we continue to look at all the stats out there and the affordable housing stats in this country aren't very good, they're embarrassing. The weight in this, et cetera, et cetera. So the -- what the housing associations local authorities who are coming more and more into it, want to do, what they're talking about is incredible. And if you like, I think getting another decent grant out of Homes England. And the first thing I'd say with that is Homes England wouldn't given history, the grant if we weren't spending the money and we were looking -- being looked on well by Homes England, maybe they can't say that for everyone they're giving money to. So we seem to be pushing on an open door because we are spending the money and therefore, alleviating what is a national crisis in this country called affordable housing. I would suggest as in when we have a Labour government that will only get greater. So the prospects that we're seeing are enormous in affordable housing. And politically, back they're enormous with Tories. I think they'll be even greater with the Labour government, which is probably where we're heading. So yes, all I would say is when you have uncertainty. So with regards to -- if you take last September, when we had the disastrous trust budget, we had PRS providers, we had local authorities. We had housing associations or just like an individual purchaser going into a state of paralysis, Stephen Teagle is here, he would say, whenever these things happen, it seems to take 2 or 3 months for the housing associations to come to terms of things and kind of move on. That's exactly what happened last September, October. What we've had leading up to the highest interest rates over the last 15 years as we haven't had a single event, it's just happened. The last month, there's been a bit of a slowdown on private sales, not on pricing. This week could be the first week where we're back on track. We'll see, it's only a week. And the housing associations haven't really local authorities haven't really step back from [ the price ] as they did for 2 or 3 months last September. So yes, we remain confident this year and next year. The only other thing I would say is that, of course, if there is a reduction in spend. One of the things that could stop it is their commitment to -- their commitments to fire safety. So as with us, all the other housebuilders, they've had to put a fair amount of money aside undoubtedly, we're not really seeing it impact us. But overall, the government doing what they've done with build safety will not only -- that cut short investment in private housing in this country. But more importantly, it will also -- because that will, in effect, have a knock-on effect on the amount of affordable, that gets delivered affordable as a percentage of private, but it will also, with the housing associations doing what they happen to do from their own pocket as it were, will impact on what they can do on producing much needed total homes, long-winded answer. But overall, yes, we're in a good place at '23 and '24 with 10% growth.

Operator

operator
#28

[Operator Instructions] All right. This because there is no further questions at this time. I'd like to turn the conference back to the host for any additional closing remarks. Thank you.

Gerald Fitzgerald

executive
#29

Thanks for that. Nothing more to say from us. Thanks for attending the call. I hope you found that interesting, and we'll update again on September, the 11. Thanks very much. Cheers.

Operator

operator
#30

Thank you for joining today's call, everyone. You may now disconnect. Have a nice day.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Vistry Group PLC transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Vistry Group PLC earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.