Vitrolife AB (publ) (VITR) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

July 16, 2026

OM SE Health Care Biotechnology earnings 47 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator

operator
#1

Welcome to Vitrolife Q2 2026 earnings call. [Operator Instructions] Now I will hand the conference over to CEO, Bronwyn Brophy; and CFO, Par Ihrskog. Please go ahead.

Bronwyn Brophy

executive
#2

Good morning, everyone, and thank you for dialing into the Q2 2026 Earnings Call for the Vitrolife Group. I would like to start with 3 key highlights in the quarter. We delivered record revenue of SEK 358 million in consumables, which represents 15% organic growth in our Americas region. A net income of SEK 129 million and an EPS of SEK 0.95. We also launched EmbryoPass and EmbryoViewer Pro. So for the first time we can compete in the embryo transfer segment. EmbryoViewer Pro, which we recently showcased at the Extra Congress is an advanced software program for our EmbryoScope pharma system. I will now move [indiscernible], and I would like to provide you with an overview of the market in each of our regions, starting with EMEA. European IVF cycle activities appear to be at normal levels. However, in the EMEA region, the Middle East crisis is impacting IVF cycles significantly. We do not, individualize group, the Middle East distributors restocking at this time. In fact, the aerospace has been regularly closed. So even shifting growth into the region is a challenge. In the APAC region, which I recently visited myself, we -- in China, we see that IVF cycles are declining year-over-year. This trend is expected to continue based on population demographics. The Southeast Asia within APAC is growing as access increases. In Japan and Korea, the combined markets are in low single digits, although the birth rate in Korea have rebounded significantly in 2026 with total fertility increasing above 0.9 for the first time in many years. So one could reasonably expect a pickup in cycles in South Korea. In the Americas region, if we look at the U.S., cycle activity was very slow at the start of Q2, so it's [indiscernible] start to pick up in the month of June. There are wide variations between the U.S. states with welfare areas like Massachusetts, New York and Southern California performing stronger. In South America, we see an increased presence of low-cost generic competitors in Genetics. Cycle activity remains robust in the Americas region in South America within the Americas region, just to be very specific on that one. Okay. So moving on to look at the performance in our largest region, EMEA, which accounts for 37% of our global revenue as is evidenced from our donor here on the right-hand side of the slide. We delivered 1% organic growth in local currencies, excluding the exited business of NACE and GDPX. Western Europe remains strong. However, IVF cycles, as I've just mentioned, are significantly down in the Middle East, and this weighed on the regional performance. Consumables grew 4% in local currencies, with Europe performing well, and the Middle East behind prior year. Technologies increased 3% in local currencies with installs in Europe offset by low capital demand in the Middle East. And we are also seeing positive trends month after month in the consumable revenue stream from our EmbryoScope systems. Genetics decreased by 3% with the Middle East volumes down substantially. We've been focusing on driving margin improvement in all regions. So it's very pleasing to see the positive trend in our gross margin. So if you just look at the chart, for the first time, you won't have seen this in previous slides that I've presented, but we have added the gross margin trends. What you see here is a 2 percentage point improvement in gross margin, primarily driven in the case of EMEA by the exit of NACE and GDPX, and also our operational efficiency program, which we have been focusing on across the Vitrolife group. We will now move on and look at the Americas. In the Americas region, we delivered 1% organic growth in the open currencies. The share of revenue coming from Americas now stands at 34%, and as you can see here in the [indiscernible] on the right-hand side. North America performed well across the portfolio. You know that this is one of our key focus markets. We've been doubling down here for a couple of years now. South Americas exit from low-profit genetic accounts reduced top line growth, but it improved the regional profitability. Consumables increased by 15% in local currency, with significant gains in media in North and South America, and we are dosed with these wins because we doubles out to take share here. And I want to thank my team for their huge efforts in bringing these wins over the line. Time at decreased by 9% due to a large capital deal with the [indiscernible] in the same quarter last year, which most of you would likely remember. South America had a very strong capital sales quarter as we increase our focus on EmbryoScope, both increasing the penetration of the capital systems but also the utilization of those EmbryoScope. Genetics decreased by 3%, with continued growth in our key focus markets of North America, offset by the exit of low profit accounts in South America. This is a strategic decision. We do not want to play in low-profit segments. We are a premium service differently in this company with best-in-class technology and genetics and we will not follow low-price generic competitors. At 3.6 percentage point improvement in our gross margin, and this is really down to our increased focus in consumables in Americas. Again, this is a strategic decision to focus on this area, and we believe we have further opportunities in consumables and in technology, particularly in South America but also in North America. Okay. We will now find move on to the APAC region, where we had a decline of 1% organic growth in local currency. APAC now accounts for 29% of our global revenue. We just launched to report that Japan delivered strong growth, our best in several years, in fact. We continue to expand our share across the portfolio in Southeast Asia. However, as I've mentioned, demand in China slowed further as the quarter progressed. Sales and consumables decreased 5% with a strong performance in Southeast Asia and Japan, offset by weak demand in China. Technologies increased by 6%, primarily driven by capital sales in Japan. It is particularly pleasing to see because Japan is a highly penetrated market for EmbryoScope. So they call out to our Japan team for the really nice job that they have done there. Genetics increased by 2% across the region to slightly above the regional growth rate for APAC at present. A 1.4 percentage point increase in gross margin driven by price increases and operational efficiency. The team on the ground has done a really nice job here. So driving price gains in a very competitive market is not an easy thing to do, and I take the Vitrolife Group APAC team have done a really nice job here. Okay. So we launched the final -- my final slide at least before I hand over to Par. As you know very well by now, the Vitrolife Group has a mission to be the leading global partner in reproductive health, striving for better outcomes for patients. We focus on 3 key focus areas to get to that positive number on spot they are growth, innovation and operational excellence. So how are we doing? Are we advancing in these key areas. So when it comes to growth, we are driving profitable growth. So we've improved market and customer segmentation. And I think you can really see this in this quarter. We are doubling down on the market, on the areas of the portfolio and on the customers where Vitrolife can processable growth. We are gaining share in consumables and a 15% organic growth in the Americas EMEA, but that's very well above. The growth rates there, and we are increasing the penetration and utilization of EmbryoScope. We are also building out our platform solution with the combination of EmbryoScope and eWitness. In relation to innovation, we're not just talking about innovation, we launched EmbryoPass and EmbryoViewer Pro, which we share [indiscernible]. However, we also have more launches and in the coming quarters, and I really want to thank our R&D and innovation team for the work that they've been doing there. We're also advancing the efficiency of IVF clinics partnering with our customers and driving the use of AI in Embryo selection. When according to operational excellence, we continue to invest in digital capabilities to improve the customer journey and our connectivity with [indiscernible]. We have taken actions, and you can see this in our quarterly results. We have taken actions to optimize our cost base across operations and back off. So we are doing what we said we would do when it comes to our restructuring program. So I would say, in summary, we are advancing our mission, and we are doing it in a profitable, sustainable way. I will now hand you over to Par, who will take you through the key financials.

Par Ihrskog

executive
#3

Thank you, Bronwyn. So let's start with just some more information on the geographic segments. Now we go through besides explaining sales and gross margin -- gross income and gross margin. I just want to add the market contribution than we had same pattern there as on gross margin improvements in all regions and also for the total then. So Americas ended up at gross contribution market of 33.8% as improvement of more than 4% points compared to quarter 2 last year. And EMEA, 39.4% compared to 35 % last year. And then APAC, 44% compared to 41% last year. And in total, [indiscernible] for Vitrolife Group, 38.8% compared to 34.7%. So the market contribution is, of course, improved Part of it is the improved gross margin, but also the reduction in OpEx related sales and marketing costs. Moving to the next slide. The highlights then. Net sales ended up at SEK 857 million. That's minus 2% growth in SEK. I will come back to more details on some of the on the next slide. Our gross income, [ SEK 517 million ], which is represented margin of 60.3%, almost 2 percentage points improvement from last year. And then an EBITDA of SEK 295 million, equal to a EBITDA margin of 34.4 compared to 27.8. In the quarter, we had, of course, the effect of this strong gross margin, but also that we have -- we are working hard on the cost production program. But we also have some onetime items in the quarter amounting to SEK 13 million. So the lift on the sales development. We have the minus 2% growth in SEK is explained by an organic growth of 1%. But then we have the exit of the NACE and GDPX that had full effect in quarter 2 that represents minus 2%. And then we still have a negative currency impact on top line, although it's much less now. It's only 1% now. So that's good. So all in all, this explains 2% negative growth in sake. Yes. Let's have a close look at the gross margin development the last 5 quarters, strong development, 2.3 percentage point improvement from Q2 last year. It's a result of our strategic decision to focus on higher margin products and markets. We see an improved gross margin in all regions and all other groups. A minor cost effect is also from the mix coming from that we have growth in consumables, flat in technologies and negative growth in Genetics. So we have also a positive mix effect in the quarter. Okay. And then if we have a closer look at the operational expenses. The last 5 quarters, we had a reduction of SEK 48 million compared to Q2 last year. So we continue to see the reduction that we have had now for 3 quarters in a row, and it's reflecting the positive impact of the ongoing restructuring program and continued cost discipline. But also, as I mentioned, we have a positive onetime effect amounted to SEK 13 million, primarily driven by VAT accrual release, but also in the quarter, we had a positive currency revaluation effect of SEK 8 million. It was minus 5% last -- Q2 last year. So it's SEK 13 million swing in there. And on the cash flow, our cash flow for the quarter amounted to SEK 114 million compared to SEK 151 million Q2 last year. We had a negative impact on buildup on working capital, mainly driven by an increase in our operating receivables, but also built up on inventory ahead of vacation period. And then a summary of the key financials then. Sales, [ SEK 801 million ] gross -- [ SEK 807 ] million in Q2. Gross margin, 60.3%. EBITDA SEK 295 million, strong EBITDA margin of 34.4. Net income, SEK 129 million compared to SEK 100 million in Q2 last year and our earnings per share, 0.95 compared to 0.74 last year in Q2 and then our operating cash flow SEK 140 million compared to SEK 151 million. And our net debt EBITDA ended up at SEK 0.7 billion compared to EUR 0.9 billion. Okay. And then as Bronwyn also mentioned, yesterday, the Board approved a share repurchase program and which we communicated to a press release yesterday night. It's a program to repurchase shares up to a maximum of SEK 500 million, starting tomorrow until the AGM 2027. This program aims to optimize the capital structure and enhance shareholder value. The repurchase will be made on NASDAQ Stockholm in line with applicable regulations and treasury shares may not exceed 10% of outstanding shares. And this repurchase program is in addition to Vitrolife Group dividend policy. The AGM on the fiscal May 2026, approved a dividend of at SEK 1.10 per share. totaling a sake of SEK 149 million for full year 2025. So that was my last slide. So we open up for Q&A.

Operator

operator
#4

[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from Ludwig Germunder from Handelsbanken.

Ludwig Germunder

analyst
#5

So I'll keep it to one as wished, and I want to keep it to Genetics. So just to make sure we get things right. So you mentioned how the Genetics exit tests are impacting the group development. But if you break it down and focus just on the Genetics development, how do you see things moving following the exit of test? And how do you see things progressing going forward?

Bronwyn Brophy

executive
#6

So thank you for your question, Ludwig. I just want to make sure that I understand it. So having exited NACE and GDPX, how do we see the Genetics business going forward. Is that correct?

Ludwig Germunder

analyst
#7

Yes, exactly. So for the remainder of what was left basically.

Bronwyn Brophy

executive
#8

Yes. So obviously, we actually have completely exited those 2 tests now. most of the revenue came from the EMEA region. So that's the region that has been most impacted by this act. But as is also evidenced in South America, we are also exiting low profit accounts. So we -- there are in certain parts of the world, primarily in Latin America. We see an increase in generic competition with very low prices. We're not going to blame low-cost generic segments. So we have been exiting certain accounts in that region as well. It has had a top line impact in the quarter, but it improves our profitability. And I think strategically going forward, we will continue to do that. So if we see an opportunity to improve the profitability of our business and it doesn't make sense to stay in lower profit accounts, we will continue to do that. So we are very much doubling down on driving profitable growth across all portfolios, the main areas where we have lower profit accounts are on the Genetics side. So we will continue to do portfolio or I guess, account rationalization is probably the best way to do that going forward. It benefits of profitability. -- and it allows us to focus on driving growth in the more profitable parts of the portfolio. Par, I don't know if you would add anything to that.

Par Ihrskog

executive
#9

You summed it well there.

Ludwig Germunder

analyst
#10

I want to say on Genetics and we're talking about profitability. I know that you don't disclose the divisional profitability. But given that this is a thing to improve profitability, could you give any more color about how we should think about genetic profitability and how it will move following this or is it possible to say anything?

Par Ihrskog

executive
#11

What we can say, which I also mentioned in previous calls is that we increased our focus and our ability to analyze profitability on customer level and market level to help us to guide which account and which market we should focus on and which one we should not focus on. So we have increased our toolbox and our competence and focus in this area to drive profitable growth. And that will continue. We will continue to work on this and in order to improve our growth -- across the growth journey.

Operator

operator
#12

The next question comes from Jakob Lembke from SEB.

Jakob Lembke

analyst
#13

Yes. My question is relating to the Middle East, and I'm wondering if you can comment on roughly how much it has declined in the quarter and also if you're able to decipher any trend in any direction in the recent weeks for all months?

Bronwyn Brophy

executive
#14

Yes. Jakob, thank you for your question. So we don't divulge as you know, we don't have those Middle East revenue or percentage decline. But I mean it is significant, and it has been significant since the start of this more, I guess, if we're calling a cat a cat, this is -- it's a war. And what I would say is that when the negotiations between U.S. and Iran seems to be going well. There was a slight pickup in due and people were feeling more positive. But of course, we've seen a reverse in that trend in the past couple of days. And I know the market received very mixed messages on the Middle East. The reality is, and we see that cycles are significantly down across the entire Middle East region. The airspace has been closed on and off. And obviously, it's not just Iran or UAE, it's Bahrain, it's Iraq. It's -- so it's very, very difficult to even do business in that region right now. Based on what we saw in June, if a deal can be reached between the Iranians and the Americans and the Strait of Hormuz opens back up, we feel that the cycles would return to normal levels. I don't want to say quickly, but the demand is there. The problem is doing business is extremely difficult. So the sooner we have piece and an agreement, I think the faster the region can get back to growing again, but it is in negative territory right now. The cycles are negatively down significantly versus last year. And we see that in all [indiscernible]. Yes. So it's a very difficult question to answer, Jakob, because I'm not trying to be evasive, but it depends on factors outside of our control, I'm afraid.

Jakob Lembke

analyst
#15

Okay. That's fair enough. And then my follow-up then is on Europe, which you say is strong. Is that you are growing sort of slightly above the cycle growth rate? Or is it sort of substantially above cycle growth rate, would you say?

Bronwyn Brophy

executive
#16

I'd say it's both. It's above the market growth rate, I wouldn't say substantially. It's above the -- but we are growing above the market in Europe. Yes. Yes. That's our stronghold, and we intend to keep it.

Operator

operator
#17

The next question comes from Filip Wiberg from Pareto Securities.

Filip Wiberg

analyst
#18

I also got a question on Genetics here as focusing on Americas. So kind of it's impacted by the exit wave reported, but if we dig in a little bit closer into the report, you report the growth numbers have been excluding those exits. So it seems to be minus 3% instead of minus 4%. So I'm just struggling to understand a little bit on the U.S. growth in Genetics. Are you seeing any kind of acceleration? And did it actually grow in this quarter?

Bronwyn Brophy

executive
#19

Genetics in North America absolutely grew in this quarter. We're doing really well there and have been for several quarters now. So North America is in very good shape. But we are exiting low-profit accounts in South America. That's the fact. So Genetics, South America is significantly down. It's a strategic decision. It's low profit account. There are generic low-cost competitors come in. We're not going to follow the market down. We have a lot of opportunities in consumables and in technologies in South America, and we prefer -- we would prefer to focus our team's efforts on accelerating the growth there, which they absolutely did in the quarter. than focusing on low profit genetic accounts. But I can tell you, Filip, we don't give the breakdown, but North America is performing very nicely in Genetics.

Filip Wiberg

analyst
#20

Yes. Okay. And then perhaps a follow-up from previous questions that Ludwig asked as well. Just in general, on genetics. So organic growth still negative across the company, even when excluding the exited business. So I'm just curious what is the path back to growth for this area?

Bronwyn Brophy

executive
#21

Yes. So it's all going to be very focused. And I don't think we should look at specific products or specific tests. What we want to do is to advance the growth of the Vitrolife Group company across the entire portfolio. If we believe we can accelerate faster in certain areas, which we do, that's where we will double down, but it's very much a portfolio, okay. What we're not going to do is stay in low-profit test, low-profit markets and low profit customer account. But we are not going to do that. The name of the game for our company is driving sustainable, profitable growth. So to Par's earlier point, our commercial excellence is much more sophisticated now. So we have been building pricing muscle. Our visibility is really, really good. It's been improving all the time. So this allows us to segment the market in a much more sophisticated way. And as I mentioned during one of my slides, in genetics, we have premium products, we have differentiated technology. We're a full-service provider, and that comes with premium prices, and that's where we will drive our growth. We will drive our growth in the premium segment of the genetic services market, not in the lower cost segment.

Operator

operator
#22

The next question comes from Elvin Rolder from DNB Carnegie.

Elvin Rolder

analyst
#23

I have 2 questions here as well. Perhaps beginning a bit on China. Considering your comments about IF cycle activity in the region and the upcoming years here, what are your kind of expectations about price levels in China in the coming years? Do you fear that kind of like pricing levels will fall given that the clinics will have to fight for kind of fewer cycles or that vendors to the clinics will become more aggressive in pricing and kind of defending their utilization? Can you give some comments about that and how we should think of kind of, I guess, gross margins in China as well?

Bronwyn Brophy

executive
#24

Yes. That's a good question. So as I mentioned, I'm just back from China. I spent some time there to really understand the market dynamics. Our prices are actually performing very well in China. In fact, we have price gains in China. We feel confident about being able to protect those prices because we -- well, we have very strong share. We have a really good reputation for quality and Chinese clinics -- I mean, everything in IVF is about success rates. That's what it's all about. And in order to drive an increasing success rate clinic typically like teams, premium proven quality products. And China is no different. So we don't feel price pressure in China in the segments where we play. I would anticipate there will be an increase in price competition in the more commoditized areas, but for EmbryoScope and for media and for needles where we also have a differentiated offering, we don't. We believe we can hold pretty firm on our pricing. So no expectations on a decline in the profitability of the China market. And I think you can see, if you look at the -- the gross margin and the contribution margin, as Par showed, we actually have a positive trend there, and we feel pretty good about that going forward.

Elvin Rolder

analyst
#25

Okay. Great. And then the second question relates to the kind of the exit of genetics in the South American markets. Are these markets or accounts that you're kind of exiting also customers within your consumables branch? So have they been using both the genetics and consumables apart from Vitro and genomics? And if so, how are they kind of responding to this decision to discontinue the genetics leg in these markets?

Bronwyn Brophy

executive
#26

Yes. So it's a bit of a combination, to be honest. So we have some customers who have EmbryoScope use our consumables and genetic services, but it's a bit of a mixed bag. And I would say, overall, in South America, it's probably the region where we have one of the lower levels of complete portfolio purchasing. So there are other parts of the world in EMEA primarily where you tend to have. I don't want to say full picture like users but higher total Vitrolife user utilization. So in South America, we do have a lot of large accounts that could primarily or happen primarily genetic services and not necessarily uses of consumables and technology. But the lower levels of profitability, and Par, you can comment on this as well. The lower levels of profitability in South America. We've had this for a lot we've been carrying this for a while. And so it's just -- I guess the lower-cost competitors entering, it just accelerates our decision not to play in lower profit accounts. We have a lot of there's an opportunity cost to doing that and look at our margins. They're excellent. So it doesn't make sense to have sales teams focusing on either driving growth or defending accounts that have really low levels of profitability when we have a really nice portfolio where we can drive much more profitable growth for our company and our shareholders. I don't know if you...

Par Ihrskog

executive
#27

No. I mean it's -- I think it's a combination of the situation in South America and our strategic decision not to stay in low profit account, but also it's also because we have increased our ability and transparency of reviewing and analyzing our profitability on account level and market level and customer level and so on. So it's led to our strategic decision to step away from low-margin business.

Operator

operator
#28

The next question comes from [ Carlos Moreno ] from Premier Miton.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#29

I just want to kind of pull together what we've been talking about almost in the previous few questions. It just seems that you presented the greater, greater than 10% top line targets at the end of 2023. And yet it seems -- I mean, you're off but slowly, slowly. And it just seems that you've totally changed the strategy to one of very low top line net growth, if any? And for all the good reasons, it's a nicely profitable business and high profitability. It just seems that over the next 5 years, I mean, we're almost waiting to the new Chief Executive to tell us this, right, the organic growth for the business, and it's a nice business Vitrolife, but there isn't going to be much organic growth because you're going to get constant pressure on the low end of the generics -- Genetics. And cycle growth is just not going to be that strong. China has got issues, a big market. I just feel very frustrated as a shareholder. We're basically in at least 12 months limbo before we have new targets that are going to look very different to the old targets. And it feels slightly odd that they're ever greater than 10% targets wherever presented, I Yes, I don't quite know it's a bit of a big question. I just feel very frustrated. Yes. Anyway, that's my question.

Par Ihrskog

executive
#30

Okay. I can start. No, I mean the targets are set by the Board, they are now into the third year. And the underlying assumption on the organic growth was between 5% and 7% market growth and us taking market shares on top of that. And as you've clearly seen recently, we are not there. We are not on the 5% to 7% underlying market growth. And then, of course, it is a challenge to be at 10% organic growth right now. If the market comes back to those underlying market growth, then we have a good chance to reach the 10%. But in this quarter, we are far off, of course, with the softening in the market.

Bronwyn Brophy

executive
#31

Yes. I guess the only point that I would add, Carlos, is those targets were set to the point that Pat has made when IVF cycles were at higher levels. The market is soft right now. There's a situation in the Middle East. I think it's very clear what's happening in China. We know the macroeconomic situation isn't good there. So the market is soft right now. And we are driving profitable growth in the markets and in the areas of the portfolio where we see opportunities. And we're -- there is growth to be had. It's not the type of growth that we would want our shareholders would want. So we are doubling down on the more profitable areas. That's the fact.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#32

Yes. It just doesn't seem that it seems more structural than cyclical. It just seems that the decision to move up the -- to focus on where there's highly but more profitable niches and a lot of the big trends like China, they are -- I mean to say they're cyclical is a bit misleading really. They are medium-term, if not long-term issues. And unless there's a massive change in government strategy, massive reimbursement, which is unlikely, Vitrolife net top line isn't going to be very much over the next 5 years, simple as that, really. It's just very odd to have such a mismatch between what's the reality and what are the targets set by the company. But anyway...

Bronwyn Brophy

executive
#33

I think there are very wide regional variations, Carlos, to your point. China is definitely a very structural for sure. North America has shown very positive green shoots, but the geopolitics there makes it very volatile. Western Europe is there or thereabouts, but there are parts of the world that there have structural issues. And then there are opportunities in other parts China is the largest IVF market in the world in terms of cycles. So it does have an impact on the global cycle when demand is soft there.

Operator

operator
#34

The next question comes from Jakob Lembke from SEB.

Jakob Lembke

analyst
#35

I have a few more questions. I'll start on the work you're doing with restructuring and discontinuation of products and countries. I mean on the sales line, it seems like the impact here in Q2 is a bit smaller than you communicated. I think it was -- the impact is SEK 11 million in the quarter end. I think based on what you said before, it should have been more like SEK 20 million. So have you discontinued all the tests? Or is there more to come here going forward?

Par Ihrskog

executive
#36

Yes. We have discontinued all the tests. And we communicated in December, it will have an impact of 2% to 3%, and it had an impact of 2% in quarter 2. So from a percent point of view, it's in line with what we communicated in December. So it is according to our expectation.

Jakob Lembke

analyst
#37

Okay. So there's no more revenue that is going to go out going forward?

Par Ihrskog

executive
#38

No, we have completely exited those 2 tests. We are not performing them any longer. I think the last one will be end of Q1.

Jakob Lembke

analyst
#39

Okay. Then on the savings part, wondering how much you have realized here in Q2? And also if you are at sort of run rate exiting Q2?

Par Ihrskog

executive
#40

Yes. No, we are not a full run rate yet exiting Q2. We communicated a restructuring program -- the restructuring reserve of SEK 55 million, we have consumed more or less half of that. We will continue into Q3 to execute on the planned restructuring. But we are in line with our plans, and we will most likely finish according to panels end of Q3, as we have communicated. So the full savings of SEK 65 million on an annual basis will be reached. But on the other side, we will also continue to invest in our key markets and key functions and IT and so on offsetting some of that SEK 65 million. So you cannot expect to see a SEK 65 million reduction on improved EBITDA because we, at the same time, also invest in prioritized area. But we are in line with the restructuring plans.

Jakob Lembke

analyst
#41

Okay. Good. And then I'm also wondering which P&L line is that reversal is it?

Par Ihrskog

executive
#42

It's in the other operating income expense.

Jakob Lembke

analyst
#43

Okay. Good. And then maybe a final question also, if you can comment on how much sort of earnings gain you get year-over-year from the timing of the conference, which I think is in Q3 this year and also in Q2 last year.

Par Ihrskog

executive
#44

Yes. I think the effect is SEK 5 million that we took in June last year, but we didn't take this year in June [indiscernible].

Operator

operator
#45

[Operator Instructions] There are no more questions at this time. So I hand the conference back to the speakers for any closing comments.

Bronwyn Brophy

executive
#46

So thank you all for dialing in. Hopefully, we've been able to answer most of your questions. If you do have one, of course, you can follow up with our Investor Relations team. We wish you all a very nice summer from everyone here at the Vitrolife Group. Thank you very much.

Par Ihrskog

executive
#47

Thank you.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Vitrolife AB (publ) transcript — plus 246,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Vitrolife AB (publ) earnings transcripts and 246,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.