Vodafone Group Public Limited Company (VOD) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 16, 2020

London Stock Exchange GB Communication Services Wireless Telecommunication Services conference_presentation 41 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Andrew Lee

analyst
#1

Okay. Good afternoon, everyone in Europe, and good morning to everyone in the U.S. This is the first of our fireside chats on European telcos today. My name is Andrew Lee. I head up the telco team at Goldman, and it gives us great pleasure to once again introduce Nick Read, CEO of Vodafone. Hi, Nick, and thanks for joining.

Nicholas Read

executive
#2

Hi, Andrew. How are you?

Andrew Lee

analyst
#3

Yes. Very good. Just going to run through the plans for the next 40 minutes or so for the benefit of the audience. So we're going to tackle a few themes, regulation and consolidation, give revenue trends across the business, the digital efficiencies that Vodafone has been so successful with, their tower plans and returns on capital structure. So I'm hoping...

Nicholas Read

executive
#4

Andrew, that's every topic going, yes. Okay.

Andrew Lee

analyst
#5

Yes. We're going to cover everything. And then for the audience, if you do want to ask questions or you feel something is not being asked, you can enter that via the web. But hopefully, we're going to cover everything. So Nick, again, thanks for joining us.

Andrew Lee

analyst
#6

And we should kick off now. And I'll scope in with a kind of broader question around what's uncertainly a lot of businesses at the moment of the corona crisis. Wondering how that's affecting your business? And also, specifically, how has it affected your growth and returns outlook in the near, mid and longer term?

Nicholas Read

executive
#7

Well, maybe I'll just answer it in the near term. First of all, I mean, we had a good summer of trading and we remain firmly on track to deliver out guidance for the year. If I look at some of the stats for July and August, just to give you an idea of what we saw. If you take roaming, which obviously, has been a big impact for the business, you've got about 1/3, which is roaming within Europe and then 2/3 of our revenue is sort of outside of Europe coming in and in Europe going out. If I take the first bucket, which is just Europe, roaming, Q1, we were down 45% year-over-year in terms of volumes. What we saw in July and August was 30% down. So we saw a lift in activity with more Europeans roaming within Europe. We saw no change at all going out or coming in. So that remains down about 80% to 90%, depending on which market, year-over-year. If I take sort of mobile activity, gross adds, churn, I would say volumes have elevated by about 20% versus lockdown, especially the Italian market and the Spanish market. So we've seen an activity increase. Fixed has been pretty quiet over the July and August, which is not unusual. I'd say mobile data volumes are up about 10% to 15% over the peak of the lockdown period. So we've seen that sort of re-acceleration of mobile volumes in line with our sort of long-term trend of growth on mobile data. And then I'd say, broadly, emerging markets have seen a good level of activity over the summer. So I stand back from all of that, and I'd say a good level of trading. If I look to the second half and I look to the sort of year after that in terms of what are the pluses, the minuses. So I'd say the sort of unknowns or the potential negatives are clearly what's the shape of the COVID? Is there a second wave? When is there a vaccine? What are the implications to our roaming? We know roaming will recover in the long term, but what's the more medium-term outlook? I'd say also, just in terms of economic activity, we have to see how the recession recovers. And then, probably the more near-term one is just the furlough schemes. They expire in October. And so what we need to see is how much corporate restructuring, redundancies, SMEs, et cetera, downsizing happens and what that means in terms of business activity more in the second half and into next year. I'd say they're the sort of, if you like, potential negatives. I'd say on the positives, clearly, roaming will start to recover. And also, the second half seasonally is lower, so the comps are easier for us. I'd say customers are really wanting NGN connectivity and digitization. So we're really seeing a pull for an upgrade on the types of services that we offer. We also, on our digital transformation, are seeing an acceleration of customers using our digital channels, which is a healthy development for us. And then finally, I'd just say about regulation. Regulation has been a drag. I see regulation being more of a positive moving forward as people really understand the criticality of our industry going forward. So we're not immune, but I'd say relatively resilient.

Andrew Lee

analyst
#8

Okay. Thanks, Nick. That's really helpful. There were 2 segues there either into revenue trends or regulation. But since you mentioned regulation laws, maybe we can just pick up on that. So what are we witnessing? Are we witnessing a change in approach for regulation across Europe? And what actions are you taking to influence that?

Nicholas Read

executive
#9

Yes. I think to my point about government's realized through this crisis, there were critical national infrastructure that they need scaled players to stay competitive as a country and enable business, commerce and society to develop. So I think governments have really understood the value of telcos may be underappreciated before. And so how will that manifest itself? I think in two ways or, let's say, two buckets, as I'm looking at it. The first one is that the European Commission came out with a EUR 750 billion recovery fund. And one of the pillars of the fund that they want to invest in is digitization. So what we're working very actively is make sure a good proportion of the EUR 750 billion goes to digitization. And then of that digitization, what are the priority areas. And essentially, we are targeting 4 areas: the first is 5G and digitization. So how can they help us, through subsidies, roll out 5G quicker across and make each individual country and the European community more competitive against the likes of the U.S., China. Rural network coverage is really important. Everyone wants inclusivity of 5G coverage. That's expensive. How can we make it more economically viable? Germany is a great model, allowed the operators to come together and the state to invest at the same time. Third is open RAN. Everyone wants open RAN to now accelerate and develop and help the ecosystem. That is an advantage for the overall industry for the operators. And we're saying to government, you can support us in that development. And then I'd say, finally, is the decommissioning of 2G, 3G and allowing us to reform that spectrum onto 4G, 5G, which is a lot more efficient, a lot more effective in a digital society. So I'd say those are the 4 things around the EUR 750 billion. I would say, in the other bucket, it's a broader set of longer-term topics. Things like we want a healthy, sustainable market structure, so we need to be scaled, allow us to do that. Secondly, ensure that we end extraction through spectrum auctions. We need spectrum. It's an important part of the capacity that we offer. Please ensure that we've reduced barriers to network sharing. I think that is really happening real-time. And support us develop a wider vendor ecosystem and diversity for long-term resilience. So I think we've got some very tangible, clear areas where we can have a positive conversation about what we really need and what the government needs to do from a policy standpoint to have a better infrastructure as a country.

Andrew Lee

analyst
#10

Yes. So it sounds positive except there are a lot of elements to go for there, specifically on the consolidation and market structure comments that you made and the need for scale. Do you think there is greater scope in Europe for consolidation, be it retail and/or infrastructure?

Nicholas Read

executive
#11

Yes. I think you make an important distinction between retail and infrastructure. I think there's increasingly an understanding that you can't have multiple infrastructure bills. It's an inefficient use of capital, low returns, and therefore, allow operators to combine infrastructure. I think the leadership we showed with the INWIT transaction and going to the European Commission and saying, allow us to do passive sharing, allow us to do active sharing outside major cities, is the optimal model in terms of infrastructure sharing whilst sustaining competition in the marketplace. And I think that was understood and appreciated, which is why that transaction went through and really set a tone for the rest of Europe, which would be replicated. I would say in terms of just broader consolidation, I would say we've got a couple of important sort of case studies, if you like. The first was Netherlands, where that was a 4 to 3, where the fourth player was financially failing and, therefore, they were allowed to be consolidated out without remedies. I think if there were situations around Europe where someone could demonstrate they are financially failing, they would be allowed to leave without remedies. I'd say the second one was the recent ECJ decision with Three, where Three demonstrated that they were a maturing operator that was not setting the pricing in the marketplace. They were not the price setter, if you like. And given their mature profile, they should be allowed to consolidate out. And again, I think that would be allowed without remedies as well. So I think you're developing a number of cases of where you could see consolidation take place. But I still struggle to see a case where you've got a price setter in the market that has making an excellent return, clearly successful being able to leave the market without some form of remedy. So positive, but maybe not transformational.

Andrew Lee

analyst
#12

Yes. And so in the meantime, we are obviously invested, as you know, very focused on in near-term trends assigned for longer-term trends in and around revenue trends. So let's take a quick whiz around your major markets and talk about the growth for the rest of FY '21 and into FY '22. And I was going to start with the most obvious, probably Germany. You delivered a really strong performance in Q1. Are you seeing commercial momentum accelerating there?

Nicholas Read

executive
#13

I think with Germany, I'm really pleased with the performance. Importantly, we were very fast to integrate Unity. So we've completed, if you like, the rebranding. And importantly, we now have 20 million homes with 1 gigabit speed. So upgraded with DOCSIS 3.1. Very fast. We'll do the remaining 5 million over the next couple of years. And I think we should put that in contrast to Deutsche, which sits on just below 2 million at 1 gigabit homes with fiber and built in the last 12 months around 400,000, past 400,000 homes. So we have a structural long-term advantage in terms of speed of our network. What we're seeing is, over the last 12 months, we added 400,000 customers onto that cable infrastructure. So our focus is very much drive penetration of our cable network. It stands at 33% today. Our Dutch business is in the sort of mid-40s. So plenty of opportunity on penetration. And secondly, drive upgrading of speeds. What we're seeing is 1/4 of our base today is on 400 megabits or above. So we know people like speed. So this is our focus. Focus on penetration, focus on our base, take them through an upgrade cycle. It isn't focused on DSL. That is not an area of the market we are chasing for numbers. Let's focus on where we have true differentiation and really get a good return on the asset that we have.

Andrew Lee

analyst
#14

Yes. And how quickly can you do all that? Obviously, there's a big checklist there. How should we expect revenue growth to progress from here?

Nicholas Read

executive
#15

Well, look, I'm not going to go market by market, quarter-by-quarter. I feel that in terms of growth on fixed, for Germany, we were in quarter 1, 2.4%. So I think that was a very decent performance. Take our overall retail business. It's very similar to Deutsche's level of growth. So I look at Germany as being a very good market. We got an incumbent that provides a very good umbrella, if you like, discipline to the market. We have a fantastic set of assets in that marketplace. So I feel good market, and we've got a good business in that market with good momentum. We can always dial up the level of net adds we want to do on fixed. What we did in April was we took the opportunity to unify the pricing of Unity and Vodafone, and we halved the amount of promotion spend from doing 12-month promotion down to 6. That's an opportunity for us to assess the market, where is pricing in the market, and we can always dial back up promotions if we want to.

Andrew Lee

analyst
#16

And so the U.K. is another market where you've been successful in taking share. How sustainable is the underlying success that you've shown there? And how should we think about the B2B risk in that market?

Nicholas Read

executive
#17

No. I think the U.K. has got really good momentum, commercially. I mean, we are, as you say, taking share both in Consumer and in Business. I would say on Consumer, very successful in driving unlimited. I think we landed that really well along with 5G leadership, which was confirmed again more recently in one of these network studies. And we had an all-time record in terms of fixed broadband net adds in the last quarter. So we know how to sell fixed. So I am really pleased on all the dimensions on Consumer. If I go across, and of course, we have our second brand, which is VOXI, also performing very strongly. If I go across to Business, I think that it's a 2-player market, and we're the one taking share in that marketplace. And we're very much focused on next-generation products like SD-WAN, et cetera, IoT. We are less tracked in the legacy products and pricing, which gives us an advantage. So of course, you rightly say, we'll have to see when the furlough schemes drop away, what does it mean to corporate restructuring, redundancies, et cetera, what implications are there? For sure, the overall sector will be dampened because of that. And of course, roaming is a big roaming market out on business as well. So these are 2 drag factors, but I think you've got to look through that and just say, structurally, are we gaining momentum and I feel we're gaining momentum.

Andrew Lee

analyst
#18

Okay. And moving on to Italy, where you've seen the other side of things got abnormally high levels of competitive intensity. What are you seeing in terms of competitive intensity today? And then how should we think about -- I appreciate you don't want to go through the trend in every market aren't necessarily through the rest of the year. But we know we've got tough comps in Q2. Should we see underlying improvement through competitive intensity through the rest of the year?

Nicholas Read

executive
#19

Yes. I mean, you're right to point out that in Q2, we lap a price increase we did last year. So it does make the comps difficult. Plus it's a big roaming visit to market. So these will be things that will weigh on the Italy headline performance. But if I stand back from that, I'd actually say that I was looking at the mobile net port activity. I look at below the line, above the line. Where you've got a nice healthy market for a lot of the gross adds are above the line and less healthy if it's a lot below the line because it shows that there's a lot of promotion spend. Actually, below the line is not overly intense at the moment when I looked at the stats. So I wouldn't say the intensity is elevated. I'd just say it remains at steady level. I would say that when you look at our mobile performance in Q1, you saw that we were net port neutral. So I think we have traded well, and we've traded well because we have a very effective dual-brand strategy. So we can compete, if you like, in both areas, high value, medium net value and also the lower value segments. So I think very effective on mobile and competitive. I would then say, in terms of fixed, we've really got strong momentum, good growth rates. We take a good share in the marketplace of fixed broadband net adds. So I sort of stand back and say, yes, it's a tough market. But actually, we're performing very well within that tough market.

Andrew Lee

analyst
#20

Okay. And then, follow-on to another tough market, Spain, where competition is pretty elevated there as well. And we've had a couple of fireside chats yesterday with Orange and Telefónica. I wondered, what is there to be positive about in this market? And how can we think about realistic prospects for an improvement in the growth in Spain?

Nicholas Read

executive
#21

Well, I think you're right to say the -- this is the one market that has increased intensity of competition through the whole of Europe. This is the one I would point to. I think there are a couple of factors. I think Virgin, obviously, entering the market. I wouldn't say it's overly aggressive, but of course, has knock-on effects in terms of how people react. I think Orange and TEF going into Virgin arriving, were not trading so strongly on the retail performance. So I think that they have increased promotions between them. And I think both of them have also looked at the value end of the market and realize that, really, they've got a lot of brands sitting down there, but they're not really getting any traction. In the low end of the market, there are only really 3 players. And that's MASMOVIL, ourselves and DG that are taking the share of the net adds. So I think you've seen Orange try and relaunch, if you like, one of the second brands to try and be more effective in that segment. If I stand back, I would say more intensity especially in the low end, more promotions selectively across the board. So I'd say that's a general dynamic. Virgin's entered the market, I wouldn't say in a disruptive way, but they're another player in the marketplace. I'd say from our standpoint, I look at it. So if you want to be positive, look at Vodafone. I would say we made a tough call a couple of years ago to restructure our business and de-risk the business model. So we took a view that this was going to be a highly competitive market. It was already, but we felt that MASMOVIL would be structurally lowering or causing down-trading in the market. And therefore, it was really important that we competed at the high, mid and low ends. Otherwise, MASMOVIL would have just taken share continuously. So we repositioned. We repositioned our Lowi brand, our second brand. We repositioned the pricing on our main, launched unlimited. All of that cost us, from a commercial standpoint, in that repositioning. The other thing we did, we came out of football. That hurt us for a while, and we had to restructure our cost base. I think what I'm pleased about is now we've had 4 quarters of stable or growing customer base, which shows that we are competing at all of those segments. And then secondly, we moved into EBITDA growth the second half of last fiscal year. And I expect to see that continue in the first half of this year, even with COVID, even with the increased competitive intensity. So I think we are competing well in this marketplace, but yes, it's a tough market.

Andrew Lee

analyst
#22

Yes. Thanks, Nick. So that's the end of the kind of 4 key European markets. It sounds like Germany, you're in a strong position. U.K., you're executing well. Italy, I guess, less promotional activity, which is, for now, you're reassuring. And Spain, you're doing your best in the tough market. So I guess that bodes well for the second half improvement.

Nicholas Read

executive
#23

Yes. And I'd also -- just to add, Vodacom, by the way, I -- we proactively came to agreement with the Competition Commission and pulled forward the data transformation price curve, which was well received. It was excellent timing because it was at the time just before COVID. And therefore, I think we were able to go on the front foot about positioning our brand and what we were doing for society when we had structurally brought down pricing, unitary pricing in the market, and we've seen very strong elasticity off the back of it. So pleased with what we've executed in Vodacom and the likes of Turkey, et cetera, Egypt, is all performing well.

Andrew Lee

analyst
#24

Yes. I was about to ask for Vodacom actually. As you mentioned, you had this -- the regulatory pressure, which it sounds like there's some nice elasticity there, and COVID on top. How do you think about if returning to the historical growth rates that, that asset's delivered as we go into FY '22? Is that still possible or probable?

Nicholas Read

executive
#25

I think it would be a function of how does COVID affect the country. Clearly, it's macroeconomic climate is not so great at the moment, but we have a fantastic asset. I mean, it's a fantastic business, fantastic management team. And what I'm excited about, I mean, we've got the whole journey of taking 2G, 3G customers up to 4G. So trading up. Whenever they do, ARPU increases, data usage goes up. But I think really importantly, and I would say this for all of the Vodacom countries, is we have a strategic advantage with M-Pesa as a platform. And market share in money transfer is considerably higher than it is on our telecoms business. So we're #1 on all of the businesses in the telecoms. But we're a clear #1 on money transfer platform. And therefore, it bodes really well to lift the share on the telecom side. So I think that's a real opportunity for us, structurally, on a multiyear basis. The same is true for financial services in South Africa. We see that as a real growth opportunity. You saw the more recent and sort of strategic announcement of how we're going to now upgrade financial services for smartphones. So I think the ambition and envelope we have in Africa is, if you like, even bigger moving forward.

Andrew Lee

analyst
#26

And you mentioned it in one of your answers earlier, but the digital efficiencies that you've delivered over the past few years have been best-in-class in the sector. And so I guess we want to know where we go from here. And you've mentioned you're progressing well on that guidance of EUR 400 million OpEx efficiencies for this year. I wondered maybe if you can talk about what the opportunities are within that to sustain it over time and maybe how commissions fit into the pie.

Nicholas Read

executive
#27

Yes. Look, I am pleased with our cost performance. The last 3 years, we have taken out, on average, 5% per annum of the European cost base, which I think is industry leading. A lot of other operators talk about gross savings. We are talking about net cost base reduction, 5% per annum, 3 years running. We've said that we will take a further at least EUR 400 million out this year, and we set a target of EUR 1 billion over the next 3 years. You're right to make an important point about commissions. Commissions is about EUR 2.5 billion and has been relatively flat for a number of years. And what we've obviously done is put a lot of effort into our digital transformation. That is gaining a lot of pace. So if you look at, let's say, digital sales, digital sales back in FY '18 was about 11% of our channel mix, yes. So coming from digital. FY '20, we're at 21%, and through COVID, that went up by 50%. So there is a strong demand to -- and I think we've worked very well to make sure that the end-to-end experience for the customer is seamless and that they can conclude transactions online without any assistance from us. And AI and various other things that we put behind that. I think, therefore, there is a real opportunity for us to change channel mix. We are also setting ourselves a goal. Originally, we had retail costs going down by 15% by FY '21. We've extended that to FY '23 and want to take it down by 40%. So you're going to see a big shift to online. You're going to see an optimization and a complementary sort of omnichannel execution, including retail. And of course, through all of that, you will see that indirect become smaller just by the fact that customers want to go direct. You've seen the recent announcement of Carphone Warehouse in the U.K., just restructuring the dedicated stores, i.e., kind of closing them down. I think you're going to see indirects struggling in this dynamic and environment. Of course, they're important partners, and we will always go through and see what we can do with our indirect partners. But I do think that you're going to see that structural shift, which over time, will have an impact on that EUR2.5 billion of commissions on top of the targets that we set.

Andrew Lee

analyst
#28

Yes. I was going to ask because it's a big number, a 50% increase in that digital proportion of sales. So how kind of sustainable is that? And how does that feed into -- can that even feed into this year's EBITDA or free cash flow delivery?

Nicholas Read

executive
#29

We'll have to see how sustainable it is. Because the good thing is, literally, when it happened, i.e., we got the spike in the digital activity, I did set my whole exec team down and said, right, we've got to find a way of locking this in and not reverting back to lower numbers once stores will open up, et cetera. And therefore, I want to accelerate our plans on the channel strategy, and we went through every single operating company over the month of April and recut the plan that they were going to execute in the next 12 months. Now will that be transformational on our profit at this year? Probably not. But in terms of what my expectations are in the next year and the year after, we're accelerating our plans.

Andrew Lee

analyst
#30

Moving on to towers. Obviously, a hot topic, it has been for the last year or so or even longer. Can you just update us on your plans for the Vantage Tower IPO and the justification or rationale for that?

Nicholas Read

executive
#31

So we're very much on track for IPO in the first quarter of calendar year 2021. So next year. We will be doing a Capital Markets Day on the 17th of November, I think that was the date we agreed. And that would be a real opportunity to share the strategy for the tower company, the growth opportunities and a little bit more enhanced financial disclosure on the company. So we are definitely gearing up to share all of that in a bit more detail. From my standpoint, I see here and think it's a fantastic opportunity. I think it was a moment in time that this was the optimal moment. And the reason why is because now is the moment when we're all starting to consider the rollout plans of 5G. I mean, it's early days on 5G. 5G, you have high coverage obligations. And as I said before, governments want wide coverage. They also want to ensure high performance, which requires densification, maybe not so much in the next 5 years, but 5 years to 10 years. And what we've done is structurally set ourselves up to capture that opportunity and the additional tenancies that come from it. So my view is the Vantage Towers will be an independent business chasing growth in the marketplace. The MSA is set to encourage them to go after that growth opportunity. And we think now is a great time to do it before other operators decide where they would want to build the towers, et cetera. Now we will have a company with fantastic anchor tenants. I mean, it's not often that you get tower companies. Normally, they've got the third, fourth, fifth operators, not the prime first, second type operators. So you've got high-quality operators that are there for the long term, inflation linked. So I think it's a fantastic prospect for investors.

Andrew Lee

analyst
#32

Yes. I think the organic growth outlook is very exciting. Potentially so is the inorganic. And so just wondered your ambitions to pursue pan-European tower M&A and how quickly you could pursue that, i.e., pre-IPO or post?

Nicholas Read

executive
#33

Yes. I think, Andrew, you say it in the right sequence, which is there are fantastic organic opportunities to grow, and we will be sharing those. At the same time, we want to be able to do disciplined M&As. So we will take opportunities where we see opportunity to add value and create shareholder value. A good example is Greece. So we announced the deal in Greece. We took 51% of the combined [ RSM ] Wind Hellas operation, tower operation, with an option to buy the remaining stake. And I think that was at an attractive multiple considering what I think the multiple will be on our tower company. So I think that was a great opportunity to add value. And we are looking at a number of opportunities through Europe at the moment, but I won't go through them. But that could be interesting.

Andrew Lee

analyst
#34

It's a good segue into kind of what we're ultimately trying to get to, which is the returns outlook of Vodafone. And just before we address that specifically, CapEx is interlinked with a little of this. How should we think about your medium and long-term CapEx intensity? And has anything changed there?

Nicholas Read

executive
#35

Well, there's no change at this time because we've been running at a similar level for a number of years. I think the main changes were more around the mix, like what you're spending CapEx on. Clearly, we've been spending money on deploying fixed. We've been spending money on some very big IT transformations. Maybe going forward, the mix is more of 5G as we roll out. So I'd say it's more a mix consideration within the composite.

Andrew Lee

analyst
#36

Okay. So 2 final questions for me. I think we've got just about enough time and hopefully, they also reflect questions coming in from the audience. You helpfully -- really helpfully provided your returns for the first time, I think, including after tax at your FY '20 results. And those are low. But I think you talked about the outlook of them rising. What is a realistic medium to long-term goal for your returns? And what are the key things that you need to do to get there?

Nicholas Read

executive
#37

Maybe the way I summarize this is how we go about constructing our plans is, Margherita and myself, our CFO, and exec team at the group will sit with each operating business. And each year, we will go through how they are executing the group strategy. So we only have one plan for the whole group and all the operating companies are executing the same strategy. And what we say is that your return on capital employed must be over your market WACC over the plan period. If there are situations where that is not delivered through the strategy that we are deploying, then we take a deeper dive into what can be structural levers to change this. Now is it regulation? Is this something unique about your country that we think is blocking your returns? Is it a lack of scale in part of your business? Is it something to do with your structural cost base? Maybe it's your channel strategy you need to your marketplace. So we really break it down into where's the analysis lead us to what is the thing that we need to change, which has led, as an example, to Spain. We did not have a plan for Spain, and we had to restructure Spain because I didn't believe that you could earn a return off the football, you couldn't earn a return in that market dynamic, and we had to change. So I think Spain is a really good illustration of us taking tough calls on repositioning our business if we don't think that it can get there. There are other markets where I make it very clear. You have a regulatory outcome you need to deliver or you have a channel strategy you need to deliver to structurally change all the local situation on top of executing the group plan, and we will be very tightly monitoring the progress, and I will obviously support the progress on delivering that in. And so therefore, you take individual market situations, aggregate. And on top of that, what we then say is, where is the power of the group? How can we drive more group synergies, like procurement, like shared service centers, like enterprise? Where are the points of leverage? Where are the standardizations of platforms that we are not replicating? Over the last 2 years since I've been CEO, I have changed the model. We co-create, as a group, one plan. So what I mean by that is the -- I have all of the big markets directly report to me. So I have an exco of about 12, 14 people. And we sit down and we developed the one plan, and then we all execute and learn and feedback what's working and what's not working to optimize. Because my argument is, that's the way we become better than a single operator in the marketplace because they don't have that learning of different executions on a particular part of our plan. So that's the 2 dimensions we do to drive the advantage of Vodafone.

Andrew Lee

analyst
#38

Yes. And so it's about getting above that cost of capital and, I guess, as quickly as possible. So I won't bother to ask a specific time line on that. I sense I wouldn't get one. But maybe we could just finish off, conscious of time. How would you summarize the overall performance that you've seen now and position of the group as you progress against your strategic priorities?

Nicholas Read

executive
#39

Well, I'd summarize it as I think it's been a good performance of delivering against the strategic priorities. I think if I look at 4 things I focus heavily on, which is, first of all, I said I wanted consistent commercial performance. I think we have demonstrated that now for many, many quarters of consistently high, mid, low, all areas of the market, that we are competing. And importantly, we're focused around 3 growth drivers. So for European consumer, it's all about 5G unlimited convergence, fixed broadband, how do we drive that in? I think for Business, it's all about being the champion for SMEs and helping them digitize their business. For larger corporates, it's about NGN connectivity. And then we have differentiation on IoT. I think for emerging consumer, it's about trading customers from 2G, 3G to 4G. They use more data, we get ARPU increases, and then drive financial services with M-Pesa. So our growth drivers are very clear throughout the whole business. I think to your point, you said we were leading in terms of digital transformation. I am relentlessly driving that. I was just having a further review on the Business side, not Consumer side, but on the Business, how do we execute for SoHo, SME, corporates, this morning. I'd say the third is around asset utilization, and our primary focus at the moment is the IPO of Vantage Towers. And fourth is we will continue to simplify and strengthen the portfolio. Simplify down and also strengthen each individual position as we go forward because you want strong local businesses with our group platform leveraged across the footprint to drive an advantage for the group and improve returns.

Andrew Lee

analyst
#40

Okay. Well, that's a really useful summary and it was a really helpful and interesting discussion, Nick. So I think it's a great time to finish. So I just like to thank you very much for your time and also thank the audience for theirs as well. Have a good rest of the day.

Nicholas Read

executive
#41

Okay. Thanks a lot, Andrew. You take care.

Andrew Lee

analyst
#42

Cheers.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Vodafone Group Public Limited Company transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Vodafone Group Public Limited Company earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.