Whitbread plc (WTB) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

October 13, 2026

LSE GB Consumer Discretionary Hotels, Restaurants and Leisure earnings 42 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator

operator
#1

Hello, everyone, and welcome to Whitbread's FY '27 Interim Results. My name is Lydia, and I will be your operator today. [Operator Instructions] I'll now hand you over to Dominic Paul, Chief Executive Officer, to begin. Please go ahead.

Dominic Paul

executive
#2

Thank you, Lydia. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining the call for our FY '27 interim results. I'm joined by Hemant Patel, our Group CFO, and we look forward to answering your questions shortly. Hopefully, you've been through our release and have had a chance to listen to our results presentation this morning. Before we open up the call for Q&A, I will pull out a few key points. Starting with our first half results. In the U.K., we have delivered a strong trading performance with a combination of sales growth, up 3% versus last year, and we have increased our outperformance versus the market. With the delivery of GBP 39 million of efficiencies and AGP related reductions in our cost base, U.K. operating costs were flat versus last year despite industry-wide inflationary pressures, including the unexpected hike in business rents. As a result, U.K. EBITDA was up 1%, demonstrating the strength of our model. In Germany, we opened 1,800 rooms and delivered double-digit accommodation sales growth that was ahead of the wider market, which was bad versus last year. Despite the majority of the previously guided one-off impact falling in the first half, Germany EBITDA still increased by 10%. Now turning to current trading. First, in the U.K., our strong trading momentum has continued during the first 5 weeks with total the combination sales up 4.5% and RevPAR up 3.2%, and we continued to outperform the market. Food and [indiscernible] sales were down from 37%, in line with our expectations with the closure of remaining branded restaurants in September. And in Germany, we delivered total accommodation sales growth of 31% and RevPAR growth of 10%, we outperformed the market. We are confident in driving a positive second half performance in Germany and remain on course to deliver profitability this year. Alongside our strong trading momentum, we have achieved unlocked in the first half and we are laying the foundation for the delivery of our 5-year plan that will deliver higher margins, cash flow and returns and generate GBP 2 billion of cash flow available for shareholders by full year '31. We have made excellent strategic progress against each of the key initiatives, and our accelerating growth plan is transforming our business. Our dynamic approach to capital allocation is key to the delivery of our plans, ensuring that we will always deliver an attractive spread of return over our cost of capital, and we are targeting at least 15% returns on all of our growth investments. So in summary, when trading strongly with market outperformance in both the U.K. and Germany, and our forward booked position is ahead of last year. We are executing at pace, delivering the tangible results and increasing momentum across all areas of our business. As well, we remain confident in the full year outlook and the delivery of our 5-year plan. Finally, you will have seen today that we have written to all shareholders recommending them to vote against the resolution proposing the election of the Convex nominee to the Whitbread Board. Our position is simple. We've got the right plan, the plan is already in flight and gaining momentum, and our business has a highly experienced and strong board. [indiscernible] agenda will significantly distract us in delivering our plan, and we believe these disruptions will lead to the detriment of shareholders. Now we do have a lot of people on our call today. So before I move to Q&A, in the interest of time, could I ask each of you to keep to a maximum of 2 questions each. With that, I'll now hand back to Lydia to host the Q&A. Thank you, Lydia.

Operator

operator
#3

[Operator Instructions] our first question today comes from Jamie Rollo with Morgan Stanley. .

Jamie Rollo

analyst
#4

First question is just on costs. You generated about 2/3 of the GBP 60 million efficiencies in the first half. You beat in your efficiency targets for each of the last 2 years. Do you think there's upside to that GBP 60 million number? And is there any early stay on FY '28 costs, particularly on the energy side? And then the other question on disposal proceeds. Clearly, you've maintained your target for GBP 450 million to GBP 500 million, which leaves quite a lot of wood to be chopped in the second half of the year. Could you just give us a flavor for where your confidence comes from in meeting that number? I see you've given a couple of sale and leaseback yield examples, but just talk about demand for sale leasebacks given the current [indiscernible] environment and sort of coming off that second half disposal process?

Dominic Paul

executive
#5

Thanks, Jamie. Let me answer the first part of it, and then I'll hand over to Hemant. I mean on the efficiency numbers, of course, you're absolutely right, GBP 39 million delivered in the first half, full year target of GBP 60 million. We've got a really strong track record of delivering efficiencies. It's one of the key pillars of our plan, GBP 250 million worth of efficiencies over the next 5 years. And we are increasingly confident about our ability to drive material cost efficiencies. And I think we did very well to get ahead of that when we announced our updated efficiency couple of years ago. So as you know, we do have a track record of GBP 250 million efficiency numbers. We're very confident of hitting that GBP 60 million, and we will continue to stay focused on driving continued efficiencies. While I think it's really important is we're making -- this is not on cost cutting. We're making really smart decisions about rewiring and adjusting our business to make as efficient as possible. And technology is also really helping us in that area. So it's going to be one of the key drivers of our plan, we feel very good about the efficiency for we've got moving forward. In terms of sale and leaseback, I mean, the short answer is, we feel confident in our position on getting to the guided number for this year. Hemant, if you could add a bit of color to that.

Hemant Patel

executive
#6

Yes. I mean, on efficiency, Jamie, you're right. We've built 2/3 of the [indiscernible] year. A lot of that as far the first half [indiscernible] come from initiatives that ended last year. So [indiscernible] food and beverage supply chain, are labor forecasting. The way we support customers in our contact center, et cetera. So we're seeing the benefits we go through. We've got many more initiatives this year, as Dominic talked about including how the checking process front desk digital guests. All that come through we're still expecting GBP 60 million. This isn't easy. It's growth that we're going to have to beat our targets in the past, but it's not something we should say for granted, and we're working hard to get to the GBP 60 million this year. I'm happy with the pacing, the partnership, it's great now to get ahead of it, that GBP 60 million is the still expected target. We're not give guidance on next year yet. We're fully dosed this year on energy, well hedged next year. So I'm happy with where we are. But in January, when we get to our Q3 results, we will give you more detail on inflation next year and our efficiency targets as well. So a much better starting the program and also the contracts that we'll have since. And then just going a little bit more on the disposal proceeds. You're right, there's a lot we still need to deliver. We still actually confident GBP 450 million to GBP 500 million for the full year. We've delivered GBP 20 million in the first half, actually, GBP 30 million since then to the balance sheet date as well as selling 57 restaurants and another hotel as well. The vast majority of our target we are in discussion on -- and well perceived with. So we're feeling very confident. We're obviously very aware of that [indiscernible] rates are elevated and might room -- what we won't do is do a deal where we don't think is the right -- gives the right balance of shareholder value. What we're trying to do here is recycle capital at kind of 4% to 5% cap rates into 15% returning programs like [indiscernible] growth. That's the intention of this. What we might do is do that blindly. We'll be able to manage how gave is proceeds, but also how we are spending capital to it necessary. So we'll watch that. But at the moment, we're still very confident between GBP 450 million to GBP 500 million.

Operator

operator
#7

Our next question comes from Leo Carrington with Citi. .

Leo Carrington

analyst
#8

Firstly, can I just ask on the Germany pipeline, It's much reduced partly with the openings in H1. I think this puts your open and pipeline rooms around the 5-year target. Is this where you might stop with growth in Germany? Is this where the the scale could be appropriate? Or do we expect more thereafter? And then secondly, on [indiscernible] activist, A few comments. I guess you've alluded to this, but what is actually wrong about or what element of the Actavis plan would be distracting. Is there something that they're specifically looking for, which you've already taken off the table in arriving at this new 5-year plan?

Dominic Paul

executive
#9

Thanks for questions. So let me talk a little bit about the capital allocation plan that we've got. And why are we so confident in it. So if you look at the capital that we are going to spend within the 5-year plan. It's actually focused on 3 key areas, the growth capital. So the significant area is accelerating growth plan. And that is truly transformative for our business, removing the drag of unprofitable or less profitable restaurants, replacing them with high-returning extension rooms is really accretive for our business and it simplifies our business. So back to Jamie's question earlier about efficiencies, having a focused hotel group that is simpler and higher returning becomes a much more efficient and profitable business is one of the pillars of the [indiscernible] plan we've got. The next area is U.K. new room of growth. Now we've already taken a number of sites out U.K. [indiscernible]. We took GBP 500 million worth of growth CapEx out of the U.K. And remember, we'd also slip the pipe back down during COVID. That gives us high confidence that the sites that we're investing moving forward in the 5-year plan north of 50% terms. And we've got data to support them. The hotels that we've opened over the past few years already generating circa 13.5% return. They're not fill mature yet. So we have high confidence on both sites, sites we are investing in and opening in exclusive catchment areas where there isn't cannibalization and are overall very accretive to our both our returns and profitability. The third area then for the growth capital is Germany. And as if you look at Germany, we've taken GBP 500 million growth capital for Germany during this 5 years, which leaves GBP 200 million, GBP 100 million of which will be spent this year. So the remaining full year only spending GBP 100 million worth of growth capital in Germany. The good news is that catalyst is really focused on the higher-returning areas. So all of the lessons that we've learned in being in Germany for the last 10 years and specifically over the past few years. So then we are not with Germany, actually is a business of scale. So as of today, we have in this call, we've got 75 hotels hopefully in Germany. So we are -- we've already created a business of scale. That means we're getting efficiencies. Moving forward, investing in sites where we are supplying confidence will generate accretive returns moving to a somewhat or leasehold. You put all of that together, . Investing in return in sites where we get north of 15%, recycling capital at a significantly lower rate than that. That's one of the drivers for the significant cash flow creation, shareholder returns creation and an increase in margins of returns. So you're right, the Germany pipeline has come down somewhat. We've guided to 18,000 rooms by the end of full year '31, but it's a higher returning, more profitable business and the data points to support the delivery of that are clearly seen in the results today see the momentum from both a sales point of view, but actually results point of view of Germany support. So that's kind of your first question. And the second question was [indiscernible]. So it's really interesting against that. I mean we got hammered in the U.K. budget last year on the back of being hammered on the budget before. So the year before you had a GBP 60-odd million increase in employment costs from actual assurance. Then the budget last year, frankly, the government made mistake and hit in the hotel business rates, particularly hard. That's GBP 160 million worth of costs that came through. In that budget over what now is the next 2 years. We have 2 ways of reacting to that. You kind of continue. With the plan we have and we just up quite dramatically in order to actually more than offset the increased costs and deliver materially higher margin returns over the next 5 years. And obviously, that's exactly what we did. And we spent multiple months, doing a very detailed piece of work literally straight after the bunker last year, supporting and guiding by world-class board and three, in global investment banks. And we came up with what we believe is a very strong plan, which we outlined in April, which will not only more than offset the increase in these costs. It will strengthen our position in both the U.K. and Germany to drive material increases in margins and returns. So we've got very strong to that. The announcement today, you can see we've got real momentum building in the delivery of that plant. We only treat every single area of the 5-year plan in terms of delivery. And we have a world-class book. We've further strengthened our world over the last 12 months with a number of really positive additions to our board. In parallel to that, we have had noise from [indiscernible]. So earlier in the year, they announced that we should do a strategic review. But we always said we would take a strategy review, which we outlined in April. And at a similar time, they said that we should put the company up for sale which is a bit ironic. So we're a public company, obviously, a public company always has to be opened for a sale. And then more recently, Accor has come out and said actually, they don't think we should put the company up sell, but we should do a strategic review and that we should give them a board it. And when we said lastly, we look at the plan we've got, which is going to deliver a material increase in returns to shareholders, the momentum we've got and find we have a world-class board. We cannot see that giving a board seat to enacts investor that appears to be changing their mind, and that a board nominee doesn't prepare to offer any material accretive skill set to our Board. I could be the right thing to do. So our message today is unanimous from the Board, which is we've got the right plan. We've got momentum in delivering the plan.We got a world-class board. In terms of distraction, yes, going back over a business review, which we've already done in enormous detail, following [indiscernible] for one shareholder, not all shareholders Yes, that would be distracted. And that risk to deliver and let's be completely clear, we are here him to deliver the plan, and we're here to deliver significant increases in returns for our shareholders, we're confident being able to do that, and we don't -- distraction.

Operator

operator
#10

Our next question is from Jaina Mistry with Barclays.

Jaina Mistry

analyst
#11

Congratulations on the results. Two questions. First one, I wanted to ask about your Q2 RevPAR outperformance in the U.K. because I think it's the strongest that it's been in a very long time, 270 bps. What's driving this? Do you see this as a sustainable run rate? I'm just -- I'm conscious that in your current trading, it's narrowed likely to 100 bps. So just walk us through what's driving it and how we should think about H2 there. And then question number two, could you remind us how hedged you are on utilities for FY '27 and FY '28?

Dominic Paul

executive
#12

Thanks, Jaina. Yes. I mean we're really pleased. I'm proud of the results that we've announced today because we think it really shows the strength of the plan that we've got and also the execution of that. And of course, the RevPAR performance is one of the key ways of measuring that. And you're a see right in Q2, our outperformance versus a market-wide. I mean this [indiscernible] ebb and flow. And of course, it's -- we're not in control of what our competitors do or in control of what we do. So it's quite hard to call what will happen to that outperformance other than the fact that we're very confident that we will continue to outperform the market. What really drove it in Q2? I think there were a few things going on. So we see a lot of dislocation in the U.K. market at the moment. These cost increases as you've been talking about the business rates and the [indiscernible] insurance. This is an industry wide issue. Of course, this is not just us. Now I think we have been particularly rapid coming up with a plan that more mitigate those cost increases. But frankly, better we're doing that than our competitors. And we're seeing the industry generally going through a period where it's struggling with cost increases. So you can see -- you'll have seen in the SDR that from the independent sector, the numbers are not encouraging for the independent sector. We think that's going to hasten in the independent sector. You can see that creating very beauty supply growth in the U.K. And Travelodge, you'll have seen from their numbers are also going through a tough patch the vote. So I think there are a few things happening. The first thing is with every set of industry challenges it creates opportunity. We grab that -- we've grabbed that opportunity to really solidify our position in the U.K. market, our commercial training engine is doing exceptionally well. The strength of our brand, our revenue management, and it shows that we've got strong pricing power, which is a combination of strengthened brand consistency experience. And we believe the best global revenue match for system. You put those things to get a on way increasing focus on [indiscernible] revenues. And you can see how we can deliver an outperformance. And then behind the scenes, the efficiencies that we're driving, the simplification in our business, the ability to invest in technology that's going to drive competitive market performance. That is fortressing our business versus the competitive set, and we believe sets ourselves exceptionally well deliver very strong performance over the coming years. So it's a mixture of the industry going through fairly tough time. And our performance and the focus on our performance, I think being really, really strong. And then from an inflation point of view, I'll hand it over to Hemant .

Hemant Patel

executive
#13

Yes. I mean, we're fully hedged this year. And we haven't given any guidance yet, and we'll give some more guidance in January for next year. But this thing, I'll say I'm very comfortable with -- We're well hedged next year. So comfortable with the positioning, obviously, very aware of what's happening with utility, gas and gas and electricity pricing and the long I can leave we'll make sure that we hedge appropriately. .

Operator

operator
#14

Our next question is from Tim Barrett with Deutsche Numis.

Timothy Barrett

analyst
#15

I just had a question. First question actually also about the RevPAR trend. What wasn't brought out in that answer was London? And it looks like you were close to 5% in Q2, which is kind of the inverse of what we're seeing in the STR data. So just really wondering what's going on in London and sustainability there? Question two, apologies for mentioning the government again. But since -- well spoke, the visitor levy has come out, and I just want to just get to your understanding of that. It feels like it's potentially uncapped. People I talked to think it could be around 5% on average. Do you think you have the pricing power to pass that on in due course?

Dominic Paul

executive
#16

Thanks, Tim. A couple of things on London. So as I think you know, we under-index in London in terms of size. And then when we look at our kind of national footprint, London is a fantastic market for us. The recent openings that we've done have been particularly strong, give us high confidence of the new site at north of 15%. So when you look at our performance in London, you have to remember where you're indexing there. I also think London is one of those markets where there's always strong underlying demand. I mean you'll see London at the moment -- lots of business travelers, both within the U.K. coming to London, but also coming from overseas. And of course, there's always a strong amount of tourist travel coming into London as well. And you put those things together and the fact that we under index, it means we can strongly outperform the market. The new sites that we've got coming on, this is a great example of the level of detail, obviously, that will be going through on a side-by-side basis. And the new sites that we've got opening up in London, prime locations, in areas where we're under index, so we have some high confidence we can deliver very accretive returns for the group. So that's the fundamental reason for our performance in London. And then when you talk about a sale, of course, we're not in favor of that when we've made that clear to the government [indiscernible] if it comes into effect, it will be 2028, we believe it will be capped, though initially, they said it to cap there was on some rolling [indiscernible] ban We do already have a line a number of areas. Scotland would be one of those things. We work very quick to get ahead of this, so we made system changes to ensure that the price is showed separately to the customer when they come to checkout, which means we pass all of that cost a lot. So if we look at the visitor tax levy, No, we're not in favor of it. It's another tax for U.K. consumers. Yes, we've set our business up to be able to pass on that cost. We also think we've got more pricing power than our competitors. And actually, we'll probably hit them harder overall. But we are already set up to show to customers that is a separate cost.

Hemant Patel

executive
#17

Yes. And then just a couple of points to add to that. On your first question on London. We did put some supply has not access the market or so put some supply. And what we were able to do there because of our commercial and [indiscernible] pricing power is take significantly more rate. So it's a very regular outperformance to the market. We are in the market by something like 7% in the last quarter rate driven because of our commercial engine, where would we expect much more rate than the rest of the proposition. And then the other point just as Dominic says, we've seen is in fall. We are -- we've got good effort to say we're able to pass that and we pass that the price of based on our forward again, one of the benefits of our strong commercial engine are really excellent pricing system. Our scale means we get so that doing well. .

Operator

operator
#18

Our next question is from Kate Xiao with Bank of America.

Kate Xiao

analyst
#19

I wanted to ask you about rooms growth, U.K. network expansion. Obviously, you have a 1,000 room guidance, but that's growth. If I look at what you did in the first half, the new openings are on track, but you also closed slightly more that. I guess, any thoughts on your U.K. net rooms growth? Anything you can share there would be helpful. The second question is kind of related. Obviously, you showed in your presentation deck, Slide 9, your U.K. average ROIC has improved to 30%, but that's below the 15%, which is the hurdle you have for your incremental CapEx. I was just wondering if that means you would look to close a bit more of the U.K. existing network as a result of that?

Dominic Paul

executive
#20

Thanks, Kate. Let me answer the second part of the question, and then I'll hand over to Hemant as the first part of the question. Kate, I mean if you look at U.K. returns, we are highly confident of driving a 500 basis increase in returns. That's because we're fundamentally improving the quality of our business. So let me give you an example of the accelerating growth plan. Removing the drag of the unprofitable or less profitable restaurants who are facing with highly profitable extension rooms. That's a material driver of improved returns for our business. Our site that was previously had the drag where restaurants attached to it becomes a much more profitable efficient side. And that drives up significant improvements in returns. We're also improving the overall quality of our state. You're right, there's always some churn that we do where we move out generally smaller subscale type hotels. And then we replace them with newer, more modern, more efficient, larger footprint hotels at a much higher return on capital and a much higher -- a much higher profitability. So the fund and then we've got journey, which is moving from a headwind where we've been losing money over the past few years to now a profitable business that it's going to increase our profit over the next few years. We then, of course, got our commercial engine driving strong RevPAR and overall sales growth and then really underpinned by a really strong best in global class efficiency engine. So we're improving the quality of our business and then making material strategic improvements to our business that drive this 500 basis points return. And that's what gives us so much confidence. And actually, think makes us quite an unusual U.K. business. So it is improving -- we're improving the quality of the underlying business so much over the next 4.5 years. And that's really what gives us both the confidence in driving returns but also explains why the returns are increasing so much. In terms of room growth.

Hemant Patel

executive
#21

Yes. I mean, okay. I mean nothing changed in terms of where we're going to get to [indiscernible] this plan. We've got 96 as we are expected to get to in the U.K. with the reduced pipeline that we've been discussing. That's made up of these higher returning hotels, particularly focused on London, the South East where our market share is much lower as Dominic just talked about. It's made up of rooms from GDP program extension rooms. It's also, as we guided to about 1,500 exits as well as part of the 5-year plan, where the AGP are closing we also taking us out obviously is part of that program, but we've met that off to give you that in terms of the impact of that and the guidance but also no tailings that's something to talk about. We don't have to model the returning sites. When we take a site out, it tends to be sites where we were able to migrate most of the trade -- and therefore, actually, the profitability impact of some changes supposing some of these smaller hotels is negligible. So we don't need to bottle that, which is why we can do the grocery repetitions. But this year, we're still going to get to 1,000 underlying rooms plus [indiscernible] 5 rooms for accelerating growth plan.

Operator

operator
#22

The next question is from Richard Clarke with Bernstein. .

Richard Clarke

analyst
#23

I guess one thing that's not been mentioned today is your 2 purchases of the future ends in, I think, Bristol and [indiscernible] is that a broader trend that there may be some opportunistic opportunities to buy in some freehold sites, either your own or on some third parties given the state of the U.K. market and the rate environment, et cetera? And then second question, on Slide 26, I think you've got a new definition of ROCE or capitalized lease ROCE in footnote 2. Just wondering how are you capitalizing these in that definition? And is that the ROCE that you're using for the 15% target on future development? Or is it your other ROCE, which strips out the capitalized leases.

Dominic Paul

executive
#24

Thanks, Richard. Let me answer your first question, and then I'll hand over to Hemant. I mean we are -- we are very, very specific about any new site that we signed off as a sign off. As I said, post-covid we did a roll-through our pipeline and removed any size that we felt we can deliver increased returns when we have the increase in business growth, we did that process again as part of the business review that we did at the end of last year, which we announced in April, where we took our quite significant GBP 500 million worth of growth capital in the U.K. to ensure that the sites that we were opening in the future, we were absolutely confident with live accretive note 15% returns. We're generally quite cautious about doing conversions. We like -- we generally like new builds because we can make that site super efficient and get scale at the site that drives some cost efficiencies and also therefore, the profitability returns on that side. But occasionally, conversions do come up, which are really interesting in those 2 sides kind of our category and gives us an opportunity effectively to open hotels very quickly after purchasing, spend relatively little minimal CapEx on those size patterns and have an immediately profitable and high-return returning site. So occasionally, those kind of things come up, but we reject many, many more than that we accept because we are return focused, and we have a very high bar for these sites. .

Hemant Patel

executive
#25

Your question on capitalized lease broker. This is a definite [indiscernible] we use internally in our investment [indiscernible] process that allows us to compare leasehold acquisitions with [indiscernible] acquisitions. Obviously, cash flow is very different for those types -- of each type and the account rate. But we need to make sure that when we are taking a new lease on, we're looking at it to make sure it's funding shareholder value. We think about the rent cover. So the EBITDA versus rent cover to make sure we've got a strong cover there and adding value overall and to make sure these are too expensive. We also then look at it as if it were an investment upfront, we capitalized these. And we, therefore, very prudently trying to get lease out sites to the equivalent of this 15% return on capital that we're looking for the free of sites as well. So this is just an internal -- an internal definition that we're using as part of [indiscernible] process. . Our overall open calculation is much simpler than that. pre-IFRS 16 view of the world and let it follow the cash flows effectively. So this is true. I guess what I'm trying to say is our investment -- investment process is very, very prudent, and it should drive higher returns on capital that we would. We're targeting a term deal for shareholders.

Operator

operator
#26

And our last question today comes from Jaafar Mestari with BNP Paribas.

Jaafar Mestari

analyst
#27

I have 2, if that's all right. The first one, just on your exits from branded restaurants. Some of the press reports on recent disposals get a bit confusing, an operator like common table taking on 57 of your exited restaurants. They're also buying a hotel in the package and then they're talking about rethinking the right menus for hotel guests and building new things together. So I'm more or there's different buckets in AGP. But could you maybe explain some of these edge cases? I thought the main model was closing down the restaurants, converting whatever space you can to high returns rooms and then opening your own more efficient integrated restaurants within the remaining space. Is that still the main model. And then on cost phasing, you've talked about cost efficiencies being 2/3, 1/3 between H1 and H2. So that's helped a little bit. Could you help us understand the potential phasing on some of the other costs. So top of my mind, this GBP 10 million rebranding costs in Germany with that H1, there's a GBP 40 million disruption from the accelerated AGP in the U.K. is that, on the other hand, mostly going to be in H2, lease cost increases with the transactions being back-end loaded lease cost increase more in H2 than H1? Just trying to understand if H1 was a little bit helped by those phasing guidance, please?

Dominic Paul

executive
#28

Thanks, Jaafar. Let me pass the first question about AGP. And then Hemant will probably some of your second question, we might have to take it offline to help you through that. So on the first question, a really good question on tariff growth around [indiscernible] a very, very good data point and evidence of our returns let focus overall as a business. So if I step back from accelerating and I talk about what we've done. So have circa 430 brand restaurants, just about, okay, pre-COVID, but clearly, as a group, a headwind to us as a group coming out of COVID and therefore, loss-making. We looked at every single site in excruciating detail. And our findings was that roughly half of those sites, it made huge financial sense to build the tensions. These are sites which have very high particularly during the week, driving high RevPAR and the accretive -- the accretion of adding extension roots to that hotel. At the same time, as we're moving the drag that branded restaurant literally transform the economics of that site. At the same time, as we're doing that, side, building the exception right -- so we've already got over 50 of these sites now open. So we've got good data to support the fact they're performing well. At the same time as building the exception we built an integrated food beverage ring. Guests really like that proposition. It basically uses breakfast and data. It's a tailored menu for our hotel guests, super efficient for us to deliver, but guests like it. So this is a perfect example and a strategic shift that is better for our guests, and better for our shareholders. So very exciting. There was another group of sites, 2 [indiscernible], where when we looked at it, we could build exception rooms on those sites. But actually, we wouldn't get a strong enough return on capital. And that's even because the catchment area really support the significant size extension or it only means for the certain times of the year like the [indiscernible] so we've taken a very good tire fork and said in those sites, we're not going to build exceptional and we don't get a strong enough return on capital. We're going to sell the restaurant to someone else, who can operate that restaurant. And one of the announcements of deals that we did over the past few months were selling 57 of those brand restaurants to a new operator. This is fantastic news. It means that the majority of those sites are going to be operating by another restaurant operator that will be serving a dinner menu for the local community, but also for our guests. At the same time, we will build a small and highly efficient breakfast room in our hotel to ensure that we always future-proof that hotel for offering breakfast for our hotel guests. We know that we that is, and it drives RevPAR growth. So the end position on those sites is you end up with our hotel with a super efficient breakfast in delivering the breakfast and guests want. And then part next door, operated by someone else that can offer didn't for our guests or for the local treated. That's a really nice model. And it's a lot better for us and also operating that restaurant ourselves. Now there is time taken to build those breakfast rooms in the interim period, we have a contract with our operator to serve breakfast for our guests for an interim period. But then moving forward, moving up to the highly profitable hotel because we remove the drag be on profitable restaurant. [indiscernible] first proposition absolutely secured for our guests, driving high guest satisfaction and an [indiscernible] part serving a decent evening meal for our guests and the local community. It is a really good outcome and solution for us. And I think that the pace that we're executing AGP is frankly for not complicated program, it is the most transformative program we're making really good progress. Thank you,

Hemant Patel

executive
#29

On cost saving, the far, I mean, you've identified most of the kind of key factors. The cost savings program and efficiency program is probably the biggest one. Yes, GBP 40 million year-on-year, effective in the first half of the year, GBP 20 million in the second half of the year. And I think as I said, a lot of the delivery in first loss-control programs that started last year in called forward last year. to get more of those cost savings in the clearly be built into the base of the cost base permanently going forward. but the [indiscernible], as you said. AGP is quite lumpy. Last there was the first phase that we've been working through. And then the second phase obviously has a big impact as we start closing restaurants before we fully take cost out we saw some of that impact in Q2. We'll see a lot of that in Q3, but then we'll see the costs coming up in Q4. And then lease costs will be more back end weighted right at the end of the year. There will be some bit lease costs will start to come up a little bit. [indiscernible], have offline with that in a bit more detail. I think the biggest thing is the overall efficiency number, as we said, so there's a little bit of kind of like front half phasing benefit for that. But I think we've got a clear understanding where where we think compares to land based on discussions that with you and your colleagues.

Dominic Paul

executive
#30

This year was a year of heavy lifting, particularly in AGP where we start seeing the benefits come through quite clearly next year. So let me just sum in of the last question, let me just summarize where we are. We have a great plan. It's going to deliver material increases in margin returns and GBP 2 billion for shareholders by full year [indiscernible] we've got the momentum in delivering the plan, and you can see that from our results today. And we've got a world-class board focused on delivery of this plan for all shareholders. So I really appreciate all of your time today. Thank you for the questions. I'm sure we'll have some follow-up questions, but we appreciate the time. Thank you for joining us majority.

Operator

operator
#31

Thank you very much. This concludes our call today. Thank you for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Whitbread plc transcript — plus 256,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Whitbread plc earnings transcripts and 256,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.

More tools for stock research

OptionsBell: an unusual options activity scanner that tracks options flow across all US stocks and emails you when large trades appear in Whitbread plc or any ticker on your watchlist.

StockMarketScan: a stock screener with alerts: 24 pre-built screens refreshed every 5 minutes, watchlists and email notifications. Both offer API and MCP access and fair monthly pricing.