WideOpenWest, Inc. (WOW) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
June 30, 2021
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Operator
operatorGood day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the WideOpenWest Market Sales Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Mr. Andrew Posen, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Andrew Posen
executiveGood morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today to review this morning -- this press release we issued this morning announcing the sale of certain markets. With me today is Teresa Elder, WOW!'s Chief Executive Officer; and John Rego, WOW!'s Chief Financial Officer. Before we get started, I would like to remind everyone that during our call, we will make some forward-looking statements about our expected operating results, the expected effects of the announced transaction, our business strategy and other matters relating to our business. These forward-looking statements are made in reliance on the safe harbor provisions of the federal securities laws and are subject to known and unknown risks uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual operating results, financial position or performance to be materially different from those expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. We disclaim any obligation to update such forward-looking statements. For additional information concerning factors that could affect our financial results or cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements, please refer to our filings with the SEC, including the Risk Factors section of our 10-K filed with the SEC as well as the Forward-Looking Statements section of our press release announcing the transactions. In addition, please note that in today's call and in the press release we issued this morning, we may refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures. While the company believes these non-GAAP financial measures may provide useful information for investors, the presentation of this information is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the financial information presented in accordance with GAAP. Reconciliation between GAAP and non-GAAP metrics for our historical reported results can be found in our earnings releases and our trending schedules, which can be found on our website. Now I'll turn the call over to WOW!'s Chief Executive Officer, Teresa Elder.
Teresa Elder
executiveThanks, Andrew, and welcome to everyone joining us. In addition to the press release, we're using a short presentation here on this webcast to complement our prepared remarks. This morning, we announced that we have reached agreements with Atlantic Broadband and Astound Broadband in 2 separate transactions to sell 5 service areas for gross proceeds of approximately $1.8 billion at an implied combined multiple of 11x adjusted EBITDA. It's worth noting that the gross proceeds from these 2 sales exceed our current market capitalization of approximately $1.6 billion as of yesterday's market close. These transactions continue what we have done over the company's history, strategically buying and selling markets in our business. The sale also highlights the tremendous value and attractiveness of our service areas and provides us with increased financial capacity and enhanced flexibility to expand our position as a trusted provider of fast, reliable and affordable broadband products and services, while also creating significant shareholder value. Here's a quick summary of the transaction. Atlantic Broadband, a subsidiary of Cogeco Communications, has agreed to acquire the Cleveland and Columbus Ohio service areas for $1.125 billion; and Astound Broadband, a subsidiary of Radiate HoldCo, a telecommunication holding company, has agreed to acquire WOW! Chicago, Evansville, Indiana, and Anne Arundel, Maryland service areas for $661 million. These transactions are a significant step towards strengthening WOW!'s balance sheet and supporting our future growth. We expect to use the transaction proceeds to reduce our debt and to further our broadband-first strategy for growth at a pivotal time in our industry. Specifically, we expect to invest in Edge-Out and focus on increasing penetration in our markets. We also expect to invest in new greenfield markets that leverage the strength of our IP fiber network. This is the strategy that enables us to expand into new markets not constrained by adjacency, so it opens up many opportunities for us. Our broadband-first strategy is working as reflected by the last 12-plus months of strong results and customer additions, and we are now seizing the opportunity to build on this momentum. We're also very confident that Atlantic Broadband and Astound Broadband will be good stewards for our operations across these markets. They share our employee and customer-centric culture and have the resources and steadfast commitment to providing customers with the same great quality of service our customers have come to expect from WOW!. They also both have strong cable and high-speed data networks and they view these markets as clear opportunities for growth and expansion. Importantly, our sale of these service areas to strong, customer-first operators is also in keeping with our brand promise to continuously provide our customers with fast, reliable and affordable broadband and video solutions. Before I turn the call over to John to go through more details of the transaction, I would like to emphasize how pleased we are today to announce these deals. These transactions reflect our commitment to improve our capital structure by lowering our leverage and create opportunities to accelerate our broadband-first strategy, both meaningful catalysts to driving shareholder value. And now I'll pass the call over to our CFO, John Rego.
John Rego
executiveThanks, Teresa. The transactions we've announced this morning represent the culmination of a robust sales process that generated a significant amount of interest from multiple buyers. After a thorough review of the various alternatives, we felt that these 2 transactions presented the best cable and high-speed data networks for our customers in the respective markets as well as providing significant value to our shareholders. The value that we received reflects an 11x multiple on our trailing 12-month adjusted EBITDA through March 31, 2021, and assumes a proportionate reduction in corporate overhead over a 3-year period. Since I joined WOW! a little more than a year ago, we've said repeatedly that we are very focused on reducing our leverage and increasing our free cash flow. Today's transactions are a significant in achieving those objectives. At the end of the first quarter this year, we reported that we had organically lowered our leverage ratio to 5x. That was WOW!'s lowest level since our IPO in 2017. After closing these transactions, we expect our leverage ratio to be about 2.5x calculated off of a significantly lower level of net debt. I would also like to remind people that with the nearly $1 billion in NOLs, this is a very tax-efficient transaction. We'll file an 8-K until the transaction closes, including a pro forma financial statement. We expect to complete the transactions in the second half of this year subject to certain regulatory approvals and the satisfaction of other customary closing conditions. After closing, we plan on holding Analyst and Investor Day to outline our strategy and to provide an update on our financial model as well as our longer-term targets. Today, however, I'd like to highlight several key data points that underscore the significant value of the transactions we are announcing. After the transaction closes, we will continue to operate in 14 service areas in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Michigan, South Carolina and Tennessee. Excluding the 5 service areas sold as of March 31, 2021, on a pro forma basis, we would have had 532,000 total subscribers and 506,000 high-speed data RGUs. The total number of homes passed would have been over 1.9 million, and our subscriber penetration rate would have increased to 29%, up from 26% before giving effect to the sale. Our financial model remains extremely robust after these sales are taken into account. In addition to increasing our overall penetration rate, our total revenue in high-speed data revenue would have been $731 million and $369 million, respectively, with growth rates remaining at approximately 1% and 10%, respectively. Again, for the 12 months ended March 31, 2021, our adjusted EBITDA would be $288 million with an adjusted EBITDA margin of 39%. We still expect the solid results of last quarter will carry over into our second quarter results, which we will report to you in early August. Demand for broadband remains high in our markets and beyond, and WOW! is extremely well positioned with the right people and the right strategy to continue capturing this exciting opportunity. And now we'll open up the call for some questions.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from Frank Louthan from Raymond James.
Frank Louthan
analystGreat. Congratulations on getting the deal done. I have a couple of questions on the pro forma EBITDA. So the trailing 12 months, $288 million, is that reflective of what we should expect going forward? Are there any stranded costs that you'll need to absorb some overhead and so forth that's not necessarily going away? That's my first question. And then the second question is sort of how should we think about the nature of your Edge-Out markets, where were -- what percentage of the Edge-Out markets that you were working on for the transaction are going with the new buyers versus how much of it we're in the markets that you're keeping?
John Rego
executiveI guess on the first question, Frank, that would be the EBITDA once we get through the corporate realignment. So just like when companies acquire other companies, they have the synergies, we have to pro forma get the corporate overhead to fit the new size of the business. So that will take a little bit of time.
Teresa Elder
executiveAnd then I'll go ahead and dive in on the second half of your question, Frank. on Edge-Out, there are some Edge-Outs that are in some of the markets that we're selling. In addition, we have some very attractive Edge-Outs in markets that we're keeping. So we still have a great opportunity with ones we've already built. But I think the nature of this transaction really puts us on a great course to further our Edge-Out and our greenfield strategy in new locations as well.
Frank Louthan
analystOkay. So John, just to clarify, so will that $288 million be lower once you absorb more of that overhead? Or is that already kind of assuming the full impact of that?
John Rego
executiveThat's assuming we absorb the overheads.
Operator
operatorYour next question comes from Batya Levi from UBS.
Batya Levi
analystCan you provide a little bit more color on how this transaction came together and the decision maybe to retain the remaining assets? On the -- if you could also talk about maybe the cost basis of these assets and how much of the $1 billion NOL remain after that? And I had a follow-up question.
John Rego
executiveSo firstly, we've been talking for a while about the company's need really to delever a bit and the company was fairly highly levered, as you recall. In fact, when I joined a year ago, we were at 5.5x and organically, we got down to 5x as of March 31. But still, compared to our peer group, we were too highly levered. So we took that and also looked at a lot of the M&A that was happening in our space with multiples that were significantly higher than what was trading at. Company today trades at an 8.5x multiple, and we just sold markets at 11x multiple. A year ago, we were at 5.5x multiple. So it seemed to us that if conditions were right, we could sell off a small piece of the company, do a nice delevering and maybe start to realign everything. That was sort of the impetus of the transaction to look at what to sell or how to think about it. I mean, we're in 19 markets, predominantly in the Midwest and the Southeast. And we had to look at things geographically and consider what's left after we did it. And I think the stars were aligned here. So we were able to do this transaction, which leaves us with a nice sized company and massively delevered company when we're done. And I think, overall, it's a big win for the equity holders of the company.
Batya Levi
analystAnd the NOLs?
John Rego
executiveYes. So the NOLs going into this were close to $1 billion. And post this transaction, I know you understand Section 382 and all the other stuff that happens with NOLs, we'll still walk away from the post transaction actually with NOLs in excess of $200 million. So we still have a sizable NOLs. But because we can use a nice portion of the NOL that we do have that will enable us to keep most of the cash on the transaction.
Batya Levi
analystGot it. And maybe just a final question on the remaining assets. The EBITDA you mentioned absorbing the corporate overheads. Are there any step-ups in other costs that we should also think about maybe on the programming side, given the new size of the company? And maybe the way you approach capital intensity of the remaining assets going forward?
John Rego
executiveYes. So I'm not expecting any large step-up in programming costs. We will do an Analyst Day probably in fourth quarter. Once the deal closes, then we're going to reset to you all and everything will give you our multiyear target. But it's sort of a reimagining of the whole company. So we're going to fuel our growth and the growth, are sure of it the growth will be fueled by few things, like the data [indiscernible] right, in our commercial operations. And now we'll add greenfield opportunities to that. So we'll have a better plan to lay out for you in a couple of months that you were going to do that will get more clarity [indiscernible].
Operator
operatorYour next question comes from James Ratcliffe from Evercore ISI.
James Ratcliffe
analystTwo, if I could. First of all, you -- it sounds like the NOLs will shield the bulk of any tax gains here. Are there any other costs we should be thinking of? Or will there be taxes? Or is the $1.786 billion pretty close to the actual cash you expect to receive? And secondly, just following up on capital intensity and the like. How do we think about the baseline capital intensity for the businesses you're keeping, say, as a percentage of revenue versus the footprint as it exists today before we start thinking about Edge-Out?
John Rego
executiveYes. So to the first one, I think the NOLs will cover us to the tune about 88%, 89%. So we there will be some taxes to pay on this. The way NOLs work, there's limitations, state NOLs we would never would have gotten. But I think the lion's share of the money will stay with the company on the transaction, which is important. Because, again, we want to get our leverage down significantly and then have some dry powder if you will to fuel future growth. So that's the tax picture. And we'll give you more clarity on that probably on the [indiscernible] ultimately exactly how that plays out. We'll still be left with a fairly sizable NOL to go forward with, but we had a great opportunity to really use the NOLs for this transaction. So that's really helpful. The CapEx efficiency of the company, when we look at our sales versus other companies, our CapEx efficiency is always sort of an excess of 20%, we're obviously low 20%. So in sort of the transformation of the company, if we can get ourselves to a place more like our peer group, and [indiscernible].
James Ratcliffe
analystSorry, I lost you there at the end.
John Rego
executiveI'm sorry, we had a late night. Yes. I mean the CapEx efficiency of our peer group is below 20%. We've always sort of been in excess of 20%. So by the time we get to the Analyst Day in a couple of months, I think we can enlighten you all on where we're heading, but our goal is to be closer to the peer group, so it will be below 20% would be where I would be shooting for.
James Ratcliffe
analystAnd just one more, if I could. Pro forma for this, will be about 2.5 turns levered. Is that the sort of the right place for the post-transaction business to be? Or does that mean you have substantial debt capacity coming out of the transaction?
John Rego
executiveYes. I think when I look at our peer -- us versus our peer group, so when I joined a year ago, we were 5.5x. And I think that was clearly way too high. The peer groups like at 4.4x, we're smaller. I always thought for us low 4s to high 3s is probably a great place to be. So 2.5x just as of a point in time, just has to do with how much -- which cash was raised. So you'll see us be lower than the peer group for sure and probably somewhat higher than 2.5x when we're done.
Operator
operatorYour next question comes from Dan Day from B. Riley Securities.
Daniel Paul Day
analystCongrats on getting the transaction through. Can you just maybe break down the proceeds, the $1.8 billion, how much exactly is that you think you're going to use to pay down the term loan versus what you're going to keep on the balance sheet? And then depending on how much you keep on the balance sheet, do you think that makes you maybe a little more aggressive as it relates to Edge-Outs than you've been over the last 12 or 18 months or so?
John Rego
executiveYes, it's a great question. I think as to how much gets paid down versus stays in the balance sheet, that will be a robust Board meeting that we haven't had yet. But I mean, the intention here is to pay down a lot of debt. I've been talking about that for as long as I -- as long as I've been with the company. I think historically, we've funded a lot of our growth through Edge-Outs. Pre-pandemic, we were spending roughly $30 million a year to build-out. We've built out 200,000 homes and then we started penetrating them. Pandemic forced us to sort of really slow that down considerably. So last year, we only spent about $9 million. This gives us the opportunity to take a different look at Edge-Outs and now greenfields which is for the IP-based portion of the network, maybe build out areas that aren't particularly on the periphery of our own network. So I'm not suggesting we're going to do 20x the CapEx, but we are going to take a better view and if we could deploy that capital to grow quicker and faster. So more on that on Analyst Day, that will be about 3 months from now.
Daniel Paul Day
analystGot you. As far as it relates to video subscribers and kind of this shift away towards broadband first. Are the assets you sold roughly in line with your overall footprint as far as like the number of video subscribers? So just, I guess, asked differently, like would you be more or less sort of broadband first or pretty much the same on the other side of the transaction?
John Rego
executiveI think I disclosed on the call and doing the transaction -- excuse me, our penetration went up across the network. So we went up for the 26% penetrated company to a 29% penetrated company. I think the way and Teresa, I think the way that it lays out with video is everything, it's not terribly dissimilar across the network. But the other trend is piece of our cutting the video [ coding ] drove, so it did all [indiscernible] to the same place.
Operator
operatorYour next question comes from Brandon Nispel from KeyBanc Capital Markets.
Brandon Nispel
analystGreat. Maybe 2 here. So can you talk about the remaining footprint from a growth rate in customers' perspective? That's one. Two, what do the competitive dynamics look like, particularly in the Southeastern markets, are those markets where you were the incumbent or the overbuilder? And then I'll just leave it at that.
Teresa Elder
executiveThanks, Brandon. On the RemainCo, I think we did share just a statistic to show you a little bit about the growth in revenue, how it looks very much like the original company as well as the high-speed data revenue growing 10% year-over-year. So I think those numbers are very consistent with our company, with all of the markets together. In terms of the competitive footprint, it varies across the remaining company from markets where we do look very incumbent like as well as markets where we have been more of a challenger brands. And just to reiterate what John said, however, the company and the markets that we're keeping have a higher penetration of 29%. So the higher certainly than the 26% we had across all of the markets before we sold these 5.
Operator
operatorYour next question comes from Matthew Harrigan from Benchmark.
Matthew Harrigan
analystYou're little more conceptual than typical. But I think implicitly, if you really accelerate the Edge-Out activity, you're going to have a higher fiber component on your exposure. Is there any evolution your thinking on the attractiveness of fiber relative to traditional HFC architecture? Of course, we understand there's ample fiber in HFC policy, but you've become more of a fiber play if you really accelerate the Edge-Out approach?
Teresa Elder
executiveThanks, Matthew. I think it's an interesting point. And one of the things we always look at is when we're doing a brand-new build out like a greenfield build-out and such what is most economic and such as the growth of the future. And in that situation, it could be that fiber as the full network makes more sense. Our current HFC network that we have throughout most of our network is very strong, gives us an opportunity for the future. We're testing higher speeds even than we have today in our labs already. So I think it really gives us the flexibility to pick the right technology depending on the situation that we're going into. And if it truly is a greenfield build, we may be looking at more fiber just because of the economics of it now.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from Kutgun Maral from RBC capital markets.
Kutgun Maral
analystCongratulations on the deal. Two questions. First, you've talked about not being constrained by adjacencies going forward when you think about your growth profile. I guess, any color on what kind of markets you're looking to enter into? And maybe what's driving your confidence level that the greenfield strategy would be as attractive for the company as opposed to the Edge-Outs, which is more kind of your historical approach? And then just when the deal closes, you'll already be at 2.5x leverage. It sounds like that would be below the targets that you're thinking about. So is it fair to say that you'll have enough balance sheet strength to not pursue any additional divestitures? Or is it too early to say at this point?
Teresa Elder
executiveBy the way, Kutgun, I'll go ahead and start with the first part of that. And when we think about opportunities, we feel like we have a lot of Edge-Out opportunities near our market, certainly. And we continue to focus on that. But as we've moved to all IT services, we don't have some of the constraints of offering services where we have to be so many -- speak from certain pieces of equipment. So we could really launch out into more greenfield markets. So it just really dramatically increases the opportunity that we have. So every decision we make, whether it's on Edge-Out market or a greenfield market, we do a business case with IRR targets and look at the difficulty to build the attractiveness of the market the competitive dynamics and all of those criteria go into our decision set. And I think it really just allows us to have many, many more opportunities as we move forward. both from our technology and then post this deal, having the access to the capital. And John, did you want to address the second half of this in term of the leveraging?
John Rego
executiveYes. I mean the transaction gives us an opportunity to do a leveraging is massive and to really, really clean the balance sheet. I know we're not in the business of selling service areas into market. So I think this was done rather intentionally to get to a cleaner balance sheet and give us significantly more opportunities for growth, though I think we got what we wanted. So that's where we are at the moment [indiscernible] it is a I guess, receiving that we're going to be [indiscernible] market so and to grow the business of [indiscernible] is a much better balance sheet, with lot less leverage [indiscernible].
Operator
operatorThere is no further question at this time. I'd like to turn the call over back to the CEO, Teresa Elder.
Teresa Elder
executiveThank you for joining us today to discuss this important announcement. And we look forward to speaking with you again in early August when we report our second quarter results.
Operator
operatorThis concludes today's conference call. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete WideOpenWest, Inc. transcript — plus 252,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to WideOpenWest, Inc. earnings transcripts and 252,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.