Wolfspeed, Inc. (WOLF) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

August 10, 2022

New York Stock Exchange US Information Technology conference_presentation 33 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Colin Rusch

analyst
#1

Hi, everybody. My name is Colin Rusch. I lead Oppenheimer's Sustainable Growth and Resource Optimization team. We are thrilled to have John Palmour, the CTO of Wolfspeed; along with Tyler Gronbach, the VP of IR. So we can get into both the technical side as well as a number of elements of the business side.

Colin Rusch

analyst
#2

John, let's jump into this because the switch into silicon carbide, which of course, is what I'm more interested in than the GaN side, so forgive me for that upfront. I want to talk about a couple of things that are really important in our view is, one, the move towards 8-inch wafers and then also the ability to move to higher voltage and what that means from a technical perspective. And those things seem bound up together for us in terms of your ability to do the epi on 8-inch for those higher voltages. So I guess the question at root is you've made some shifts over the last couple of years of migrating towards the confidence level in that 8-inch ramp up in Mohawk Valley. And I'd love to understand some of the history around the development on that because I think -- from my understanding, there's been some important elements that have evolved over the last, call it, 18, 24 months for the firm in terms of the learning cycles.

John Palmour

executive
#3

Sure. So I'm going to go back 35 years. So you called it the shift to silicon carbide. We've actually always been doing silicon carbide. I've been working on silicon carbide power for 35 years. Started selling our first devices 20 years ago. But it was what I would call niche products at first, and then it's gotten more and more accepted. We released our first MOSFETs, the market's first month that's about 11 years ago. And when they -- we were able to get the MOSFETs, we were able to really start getting into other applications and that built more volume, et cetera. In the meantime, when we started, we were on 1 inch diameter wafer. So talking about 8 inch. This is my seventh or eighth increase in wafer diameters that I've been through. But I will say, it gets harder and more challenging every time we do it. So we -- when we first released our products, I think we were on 2 or 3-inch wafers, then we converted to 4, then we converted to 6. When we started to build the Mohawk Valley fab, which we announced in '19, I think, we had actually already demonstrated the 200-millimeter wafer. So we demonstrated our first 200-millimeter wafer in 2015. We showed it at the International Silicon Carbide Conference, et cetera, and we were working on it. But when we started to build Mohawk Valley, we realized that now would be the ideal time to put that into production. And the big reason for that is, a, it's really hard to change wafer diameters in midstream when you're building -- when you've built a big automated fab. So a logistical nightmare. And maybe even the bigger nightmares now we're dealing with a lot of automotive companies, and qualifying a change like that would be a very big deal. And a lot of automotive companies would actually just say, no, don't do that, like don't change anything. So we really saw Mohawk Valley as the opportunity to really push 200-millimeter maybe ahead of the schedule, the normal schedule we would have followed. So we really started investing heavily back then 3, 4 years ago. And we got to the point where things look promising enough from a yield standpoint, cost standpoint, epi standpoint that we made the commitments to go all in on 200-millimeter at Mohawk Valley, which we announced 15 months ago or something like that.

Colin Rusch

analyst
#4

So let me go back a little bit, kind of around that time because you announced the 200-millimeter. And then there was this discussion around ramping some 150-millimeter capacity in that facility and then it went back to 200 millimeter, right? And so...

John Palmour

executive
#5

We actually had said -- when we first announced Mohawk Valley, we actually had said that we were going to start it on 150 and then convert it to 200. That was our...

Colin Rusch

analyst
#6

Messaging. Right.

John Palmour

executive
#7

Yes. It was a plan of record until we felt really confident that 200 was going to work. So obviously, internally, we were planning on 200 if it worked. And we all had to get around the table with Greg and say, yes, we're going to be ready before we announced that it was actually going to open up this 200.

Colin Rusch

analyst
#8

So -- all right. So from the initial plan to the commitment to 200-millimeter, my understanding is that you guys were able to buy a test line in Albany do some learning cycles there or...

John Palmour

executive
#9

Yes. It was actually an existing 150-millimeter lab that had been built. And so we brought that lab up and started making -- made MOSFETs on it. Then we converted it to 200-millimeter with some of the tools that we were targeting for Mohawk Valley. And so we were able to get those tools in, shake them down, develop processes and show actually some very good yield in 200-millimeter wafers. And all with the knowledge that those tools were, a, we're going to order identical tools, which ideally, we would be able to turn on like that and also move those tools from the Albany lab into Mohawk Valley. So we've got a fair amount of learning under our belt before Mohawk Valley ever started up.

Colin Rusch

analyst
#10

Okay. And so...

Tyler Gronbach

executive
#11

And Colin, I think it's also important. We also learned from running that pilot line that the yields were actually better on the pilot line on 200 than what we're running on 150 in Durham. So that gave us further...

Colin Rusch

analyst
#12

Oh man, well, what you guys doing in Durham, man? Like, goodness me. All right. So let's talk about this because I feel like this is a point of education with a lot of investors around the sensitivity around these tools and the recipe on them. Because these are like these are very difficult tools to design, let alone run, right? And so having known some folks that run these tools, I mean, you can -- the way it's been quoted to me is, if you touch the tool, you'll get cut, right? Like people will viciously attack you if you start messing with their tool at all. And so like the definition of the process, clarifying the yield. I guess, as you guys think about like how many iterations you've gone through and the learning cycles you've gone through on that tool to get comfortable with this production run and how many more they're going to be kind of in terms of the adjustments from here, I think it's important to help folks understand kind of how deep that process is and how specific that is. So I'm not sure how you can talk about that in this context, but I would love to give folks a sense of that.

John Palmour

executive
#13

I'll try to take a stab at it. So there's a couple of things. One is, yes, we can develop a tool, but by and large, the tools we were working with in Albany we're the first of their kind. And we were able to tune in processes for a lot of the major steps that are going into Mohawk Valley. Were we able to get every tool in that Albany lab? No. So we do have some first-of-a-kind tools that are in Mohawk Valley that we have to tune in. But we've derisked it a lot by having the major processes that we already worked on in Mohawk Valley fab. So we think -- I'm not going to say it's a slam dunk, but we've been able to derisk it a lot, basically putting us a year ahead effectively of where we would be otherwise. Then ideally, you drop in 10 more and they all act exactly the same. That's never the case. Every tool has its own little identity. But I would say we've gotten familiar enough to where we can intelligently do tool matching and tune them in to match each other which is a big effort we've been doing even in North Carolina that's helped improve yields. So those -- I think we have a very good head start. It doesn't mean everything goes perfect, but I think we've retired a lot of the risk that you would typically see in a brand-new fab with a brand-new wafer diameter.

Colin Rusch

analyst
#14

Amazing. All right. That's super helpful. So then let's move on to the epi layer, right? Because you guys have really pioneered 800-volt for commercialization, right, in commercial applications. And the moment that there was like a lot of hoo-ha in the EV industry was when the Porsche Taycan came out with 100 -- or 220- to 240-mile range, right? And that was largely due to silicon MOSFETs, not silicon carbide MOSFETs, right? Like that was the big element, and they had designed on an 800-volt architecture which they couldn't get comfortable with the supply chain at that point in that risk profile. So I think it would be helpful for us to understand kind of as you go out to these bigger diameters, the epi process around enabling these higher voltages and why that's so difficult, right? Like I mean, these are ultimately solvable problems, which -- and you guys have demonstrated an ability to do that. But I want to understand kind of why that's so complicated and what you've had to do to understand and make that possible.

John Palmour

executive
#15

Well, I guess kind of everything is relative. The 800-volt epi -- or the 800-volt, meaning we use a 1,200-volt device, that epi is not that much more challenging than a 600-volt. It's twice as thick, the devices are bigger, so you've got to have better defect densities. But it's kind of like if you could do a 600-volt device epi for that, you can do epi for a 800- or 1,200-volt device. The big issue is moving from 150 to 200 because there were no epi platforms, 0. So we had to work with companies to develop a 200-millimeter platform. We also have some capability to build our systems internally. So we've investigated numerous paths. Last year, we presented a chart at the silicon carbide conference where we showed a chart where we were looking at 3 different Epi platforms, and they're all still in place. But 8-inch or 250 -- excuse me, 200-millimeter is an interesting crossover point even when you look at silicon. As to whether it's multi-wafer epitaxial systems or single wafer and there are ways to do 200-millimeter silicon carbide with both. And we're actively pursuing and developing all possible...

Colin Rusch

analyst
#16

Well, pioneering I think is maybe the word...

John Palmour

executive
#17

Pioneering is -- yes, it was. And I can tell you that when we had this discussion about Mohawk Valley, I actually said the epi process was going to be the long pole in the tent because there just was no tool available. We did an announcement with AIXTRON that we had worked with them on developing 200-millimeter tool, and that, I would say, by and large, was 1 of the longest poles in the tent was getting the epi process.

Colin Rusch

analyst
#18

Excellent. And so this is all super helpful. But one of the things that I want to get back to, and it's something you guys did a great job with your Analyst Day a couple of years ago, is talking about the actual silicon carbide growing process, right? And I think you put a slide up around 60-some different crystalline structures that could develop...

John Palmour

executive
#19

200 of them.

Colin Rusch

analyst
#20

All right, 100% will be corrected on that happily. So -- like I believe the technical term is a cluster and so -- of things that could go wrong for growing this process. And you guys have demonstrated a very consistent level of market share in terms of your ability to grow the material and actually manage the material into wafers, right? Because there's a whole another level of complexity as you make those services where they need to be. And so I guess, just even before some of this wafer size and epi layers, like it seems like there's an awful lot going on in terms of how you grow the ingots and then how you wafer them. And so I'm wondering if you can talk about that and some of the competitive advantages around that, that really translate into better cost structure, better yield downstream from those processes.

John Palmour

executive
#21

Sure. So to your first point about the crystal structure. So there's 200-something different, what's called polytypes, different crystal structures for silicon carbide. And there's very, very little that separates them thermodynamically from a -- it's just about as easy to get 1 crystal structure as another like you don't really separate them with [ temp ] or pressure or anything. So one of the common problems is you'll get a polytype inclusion in the crystal. So what's that? That's an area maybe you were growing 4H silicon carbide, the one we want, and you'll get an inclusion of 6H carbide or 15R, which is around the neutral crystal structure. Any device on there is not going to work. And there's usually a large stress field around those defects and devices even around that, even if they're not on that polyblock, might not yield. So it's very easy to get those polycrystalline -- or excuse me, polytype Inclusions in your crystals. So you have to learn how to manage that. Even if you don't have those, there's a number of what I would call, killer defects in silicon carbide that will really nuke your device yield. The #1 is called the micropipe, which if you really want to have fun, it's the open core of a superscrew dislocation, not that anyone cares. It's a hole in the wafer. And -- the device will fail. So it's a yield killer. It's not a latent failure, it's an immediate fail. So that reduces your yield. So you've got to get rid of micropipes. After that one, you got to worry about things like screw dislocations which is a type of defect, basal plane dislocations. So you've got to get all these crystalline defects down after you've solved those other 2 really macro problems, you've got to get really low defect entities in order to get good yield and reliability on your devices, your MOSFET. And a lot of these things is like pushing on a balloon. Like I can do things that will make polytype inclusions better, but it increases defect densities, et cetera. So it's managing all those kind of competing processes. And one of the things you mentioned that is in no small part a challenge is what we call wafer shape. So you can do a lot of things in crystal growth to reduce defects or reduce polytype inclusions. And then when you cut a wafer, it'll turn into a potato chip. So you can't have that happen either because it's not usable. So just a lot of different things to manage, not to mention that silicon carbide is the third hardest material known to man. So wafering it, grinding it, polishing it is very difficult, and it's hard to get at that specular defect-free surface that you want for a semiconductor.

Colin Rusch

analyst
#22

So this is a super exciting segue for me, because we've seen kind of a long cycle of folks that have been working with this material and trying to integrate them into the vehicles, right? And so like the complexity of the crystal growth into the wafering into the epi layer, into yields to get the performance and cost structure relative to some of the alternatives. As you look at this industry, this has been developing for a long time, to your point about 35 years of working on this, to a point where there's a fundamental shift in terms of power electronics and the efficiency of those power electronics that are helping enable what we think is a massive transformation around both the transportation fuel, but also the power and heating fuel market out there, right? Like this isn't just about EVs. This is also about renewables -- exactly, right? Like there's a whole other demand driver that's not getting discussed in many dialogues right now and the amount of efficiency that comes from silicon carbide. So as you guys look at kind of this long complex development of the technology and now moving into this point of inflection and the adoption cycle, I mean, I guess is through my coverage of Tesla, one of the things that happened was there was a real hardship for them around adopting silicon carbide into their vehicles from the manufacturers and their supply chain. Some of that's been -- kind of gone over the hump on 400-volt. And as you go to some of these higher voltages, there's another layer of efficiency that can be had. But I think as you guys look at the market and look at the complexity of the technology and your ability to leverage that expertise around quality and consistency into lower cost structure into this opportunity, can you talk a little bit about what's going on in the sales process around customer trust around the facilities, consistency of the units and what that really enables for them from a product design and a real cash flow downstream from you guys in terms of asset ownership and things like that?

John Palmour

executive
#23

Yes. So a couple of -- because we have several different businesses, but in terms of the materials business, we've been selling to these -- to our materials customers who couldn't be with us in the device market. We've been selling to most of these guys for 20 years or more so we have a very good relationship and a lot of trust there as -- because we've been the primary wafer supplier. And so I'd say that trust has come with experience and our ability to ramp, et cetera. In the device market, we're newer. We're not as well-known as, say, an Infineon or an [indiscernible] or ST. But we have been in this for quite some time. And I think where we've gotten a lot of trust from our device customers is the fact that we own the entire supply chain. And we are able to make progress and solve issues very quickly because we have everybody under one roof. So let's say there's an issue. Well, was it a fab issue, an epi issue, a crystal growth issue? We have everybody there to figure it out very quickly. And I'd say we're investing extremely heavily. So that plays, I think, very well with the OEMs that I think were kind of out in front in terms of the investment we've made in capacity. I can tell you, I think some of our silicon carbide competitors might have thought we were a little crazy when we announced Mohawk Valley back in 2019. And I think that's proven to be a very prescient decision that we made.

Colin Rusch

analyst
#24

Yes. And can we talk about that? Because we just got some news over the weekend with the Inflation Reduction Act. And I don't know if you guys have had an opportunity to go through any sort of opportunities there. There's obviously hundreds of millions of dollars coming in the door to the company here over the next several quarters as you finish that facility from New York State. But are there additional benefits that you guys are really eyeing right now from an economics perspective by having that domestic facility here?

John Palmour

executive
#25

Well, yes, the CHIPS Act is what we're really targeting. We've been pretty open that we are going to need to build another fab, materials fab, et cetera, materials factory. So we, without a doubt, have an eye on the CHIPS act now that it's law. I'm very glad to see that happen. But you don't just go get in federal, you also have to work closely with state, local authorities, and we have been doing that as we plan for future expansion. So I'd say we're moving down that path and very excited to be able to have the potential to add CHIPS act money into that mix.

Tyler Gronbach

executive
#26

Let me just build on what John said, though. What we're really encouraged with is, since April when we announced the need-- we talked about the need for more capacity. And you look at the most recent Yole report, and they talk about the silicon carbide market is going to be capacity constrained until the end of this decade. So even with all the things that we're talking about here, there's still not going to be enough silicon carbide. So what's happening, though, is that these avenues of funding are opening up to us. So like John said, we've got federal and state funding here in the U.S. We've been talking with European officials about potentially what might be afforded to us out over there. Customers. We've got customers now that are willing to assign assurance of supply agreements where there's a tight exchange between the 2 of us on their forecast, some cash up front that allows us to align capacity based on their future needs, but there's also lots of other avenues that we're exploring for funding. So we feel right now while it did cause some people to kind of say, really, you're out of capacity in New York already? And when you look at the billions of dollars of design-ins that we've announced over the last several quarters, it does start to the math starts to work where you're running out of capacity in New York, our materials factory in Durham is probably at capacity, and we know that we need more 200-millimeter. So I think the takeaway for people that are listening today is that we're very encouraged with what we're seeing from a funding opportunity. So we do see a good line of sight that does get us to that next fab, that next materials factory. And I think, like John was saying, there's lots of levers that we can kind of pull on that. So I think that's what we're encouraged with.

Colin Rusch

analyst
#27

That's awesome because -- and you're also making a really important point for me that I just want to emphasize with investors. As we go through a substantial amount of population growth and higher consumption growth and higher electricity use, the ability to leverage the basic materials that are going into all of these devices and have lower system losses is hugely important. And you guys are an enabler of efficiency. But also the scope and scale of the transformation that we're just getting started on is so substantial. It's very hard to understand right now and just in terms of the scale of what's going on, on the grid as well as through all these other applications. So with that in mind, you talked about the billions of dollars of design-ins and the customer activity, which has been, frankly, just pretty impressive here. And I know I'm a little late to the party on the upgrade. I wanted to see you guys get a little bit further down the road with capacity. But can you talk about the scope and scale of the customer discussions? And you were just alluding to this a little bit in terms of their willingness to do some prepayments for dedicated capacity. But also like just understanding how this business is going to grow over the next 3 years to 2025, but then this whole other kind of inflection point that we're expecting in the back half of the decade around some of this growth. Just want to get a sense of how those customers are talking with you now around kind of staging of some of this demand and sell-through and then kind of your sense of how big this business might ultimately get for Wolfspeed.

John Palmour

executive
#28

Tyler, I'll let you start, and then maybe I'll jump in.

Tyler Gronbach

executive
#29

Sounds good, John. Yes, I think, Colin, as I mentioned, we've seen a device opportunity pipeline. When we first started talking about the device opportunity pipeline, it was around $9 billion. Now it's north of $25 billion in about 3 years. And it's to the point that you just made. Couple of things have happened in the last couple of years during the course of the pandemic. And that was, number one, we've seen silicon substitution start to happen. So with the stock out of silicon -- of silicon devices, you had lots of customers that were saying, well, what is the art of the possible if I move to a silicon carbide-based solution. And what they started to find is that there was design efficiency, there was cost savings. So while there was a step-up in cost in moving to that device, what they started to find is, hey, I could make my battery smaller. My wiring harness got smaller. The weight of my vehicle or what have you got lighter. So we saw silicon substitution, which was great. But what we also started to see is through partnership with Arrow Electronics, we had a very finite amount of the market that we could cover, but Arrow's got 20,000 people around the world doing all kinds of interesting things. We've talked about in previous calls about an electric submarine, an industrial blender. There are just things that a couple of years ago, John and I never thought that we would be in that we're actually getting designed in now. So the aperture is continuing to open. So we'll give you an update next week on where we see the device opportunity pipeline. But what I would say is this, is that we see an exceptional amount of growth in the current areas of opportunity we serve in industrial and energy, in electric vehicles, in RF, but we also see -- John and I were having a conversation with some people doing some research with us this morning, where there are markets that we have yet to tap that are a complete fit for silicon carbide. And what we're working on is kind of the underlying math and science to show people, look at what you get when you move to a silicon carbide-based application. John, I don't know if you have any other thoughts.

John Palmour

executive
#30

You hit what I was going to say, which is we talk a lot about automotive, but a lot of the success we're seeing, it doesn't extend out into these really long-range forecasts because -- but we're getting a lot of success in industrial markets, which tend to forecast more out like 2, 3 years rather than 5, 6, 7. But the acceptance of silicon carbide in the industrial market has been kind of a surprise, and it's really, the entire industry is waking up to the advantages that we can bring. And a lot of it is stuff we've been in before, like server power supplies and solar inverters, et cetera, those are the things we knew about. But yes, aviation now is looking very seriously at it. Electric jet...

Colin Rusch

analyst
#31

One of my favorite ones is vacuum cleaners. Like the [ C range ] of vacuum cleaners apparently is amongst the highest among any industrial applications. So obviously, you guys could be a facilitator on that. So this is super helpful. So what I'm hearing you guys say and just help me clarify if I'm not reflecting this, is you now have tens of billions of dollars in the pipeline of opportunities that have kind of developed over a few years. And that application set is continuing to grow. So we're not talking about silicon carbide being a $1 billion or $2 billion opportunity, this is a multibillion-dollar opportunity for you guys as this industry scales and changes shape. What should we be talking about that we're not talking about? We're coming up on the half hour of time here. Obviously, we're completely ignoring some critical parts of some of the business here, which admittedly, I'm less interested in, but I'm happy to address some of them with you. But what else should we be talking about and thinking about with the Wolfspeed story and the Wolfspeed technology platform?

Tyler Gronbach

executive
#32

John is going to have a point of view on this. I think we've talked about this with you, too. I think, listen, we take a very -- we are very encouraged with the competitive environment here because all things silicon carbide are good for the industry, for us. So a lot -- there's a lot of wanting to pit one against the other. Yes, we have rivals in the marketplace. But guess what, as I talked about a little bit earlier, we're going to be -- all going to be capacity constrained. We are counting on our customers on the material side of the business, that they're going to meet or beat their expectations with their silicon carbide operations because all of us are getting vertically integrated. So what I would say to all that is that we're counting on folks to kind of do what they say they're going to do. And at the same time, we're looking to expand our own capacity because of the size of the opportunity and kind of what we see out there. So I think all boats rise as it relates to silicon carbide. And I think I'll let John talk a little bit more about this, we are still very early stage in this market. This is not a mature market at all. So I think if you're new to silicon carbide or you've been in this for a long time, I think, John, it's fair to say we're still pretty early stage, right?

John Palmour

executive
#33

Yes, we absolutely are. And just to echo what Tyler said, I mean our silicon carbide competitors, they're not really the enemy. The enemy for us is silicon. And I would say we're winning pretty well in that battle. And it is driven by a lot of what I would call macroeconomic conditions, government incentives, the push for higher efficiency. The electrification of everything plays very much into our strengths, and we are seeing huge interest all across that. And markets that we're not in today but will be are higher voltage devices for things like train drives, traction control, smart power, grid management. Those are all the things that are cooking in the background that we are excited to see develop also.

Colin Rusch

analyst
#34

Perfect. Well I love this part of the cycle technology development where we're in full co-opetition mode, where everybody is hugging and high-fiving on the progress. So looking forward to enjoying this for a couple of years. Guys, thank you so much for taking the time with us, sharing the expertise and your willingness to get into some of the technical details with us today. For everybody that's dialed in, we're more than happy to help if you want to spend some more time on the Wolfspeed story, share what we know and obviously, get you in touch with the company as it makes sense. John and Tyler, again, thank you for carving out the time for us today and sharing your expertise, and we'll look forward to catching up with everybody soon. Take care.

John Palmour

executive
#35

Sounds good. Thanks.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Wolfspeed, Inc. transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Wolfspeed, Inc. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.