X4 Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (XFOR) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

November 5, 2020

NASDAQ US Health Care Biotechnology earnings 29 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator

operator
#1

Greetings, and welcome to X4 Pharmaceuticals Third Quarter Financial and Operating Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Candice Ellis, Director of Corporate Communications and Investor Relations at X4. You may begin.

Candice Ellis

executive
#2

Thank you, operator, and good morning, everyone. Thanks so much for joining us today. Presenting on today's call will be our Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Paula Ragan; and our Chief Financial Officer, Adam Mostafa. Following prepared remarks by each, we will open the call to your questions, and they will be joined by our Senior Vice President of Technical Operations and Quality, Dr. Mary DiBiase. As a reminder, on today's call, we'll be making forward-looking statements regarding our regulatory and product development plans as well as our research activities. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ from those forecasted. The description of these risks can be found in our most recent Form 10-K on file with the SEC and our forthcoming Form 10-Q. I'd now like to turn the call over to our CEO, Paula Ragan.

Paula Ragan

executive
#3

Thanks, Candice, and thank you, everyone, for joining us on the call this morning. We hope you are all continuing to stay safe and healthy. We are pleased to report today that while the operating environment remains challenging due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, we continue to advance our mavorixafor clinical development programs. Let me begin with a review of our most recent accomplishments. We are pleased to announce the publication of our positive Phase II safety and efficacy data for mavorixafor in the WHIM syndrome in the prestigious journal, Blood, which, we believe, further recognizes the significant potential of our lead candidate in this patient population. As a reminder, WHIM syndrome is a rare inherited primary immunodeficiency disease caused by mutations in the chemokine receptor, CXCR4, a receptor that plays a key role in enabling the healthy trafficking of immune cells and effective immunosurveillance. Mavorixafor is our first-in-class small molecule antagonist of the chemokine receptor, CXCR4, and is being developed as a once-daily oral therapy. While the comprehensive data published in Blood expands on previously presented data, there were new results presented, including patient-level data regarding the specific effects on neutrophils, lymphocytes and monocytes as well as the effect of increasing doses of mavorixafor on total white blood cell counts. In addition, the manuscript provided the most up-to-date long-term safety and pharmacokinetic data and presented a detailed analysis of the clinical benefit of the extended mavorixafor therapy on infection rates and work burden. This important publication in the official journal of the American Society of Hematology provides key third-party validation of the data supporting our clinical strategy, including the selection of the dose, primary biomarker endpoint and secondary clinical endpoints for our ongoing pivotal Phase III clinical trial. The published results continue to reinforce our belief that by downregulating the CXCR4, CXCL12 signaling pathway, mavorixafor has the potential to be the first disease-modifying therapy for the more than 3,500 estimated diagnosed and undiagnosed WHIM patients in the U.S. We are also thrilled to be granted Fast Track Designation by the FDA for mavorixafor and WHIM syndrome. Through the Fast Track program, X4 is eligible for more frequent meetings with the FDA to discuss the drug's development plan, protocols and clinical data that would support mavorixafor's potential approval for WHIM. This key regulatory achievement further recognizes the significant unmet need of WHIM syndrome and mavorixafor's potential to treat this challenging disease. As a reminder, mavorixafor was previously granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation by the FDA as well as Orphan Drug status by the FDA and the European Commission for the treatment of WHIM syndrome. Let me now provide an update on our ongoing clinical development programs for mavorixafor. Importantly, despite continued uncertainties surrounding COVID-19, we remain focused on advancing our clinical development programs. We continue to enroll patients in our Phase III WHIM syndrome trial and made good progress across the various regulatory and clinical aspects of the trial. We are diversified across numerous sites and countries around the world, each of which has its own regional and site level COVID-19 considerations. We are working with the sites to maintain enrollment momentum in the trial and including additional services such as in-home patient visits to mitigate the impact of COVID-19. We continue to anticipate top line Phase III data in WHIM syndrome in 2022 and intend to provide further clarity on the time line as soon as we are able to do so. Our Phase Ib trial in severe congenital neutropenia also continues to make progress, and we anticipate initial data from this 14-day proof-of-concept study in 2021. Similar to the Phase III WHIM syndrome trial, we intend to provide further clarity around our SCN trial time line as soon as we are able to do so. In Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia or WM, a rare form of lymphoma, we are continuing to enroll patients, although COVID-19-related delays have had some impact as we recently disclosed. We expect the availability of the initial Phase Ib clinical results in the first half of next year, a slight delay from our previous guidance of the second half of this year. In order to mitigate COVID-19-related patient travel concerns in the study, we are focused on implementing home health visits. We are in regular dialogue with our investigators and through our patient advocacy team with patients to understand their needs given the extended challenges of the COVID pandemic. We are confident that we have an effective plan in place to appropriately address the impact of COVID-19 on our WM study. As a reminder, this Phase Ib clinical trial is expected to enroll between 12 and 18 patients with WM and is a multicenter open-label dose escalation clinical trial assessing the safety and tolerability of mavorixafor in combination with ibrutinib. The trial is being conducted as part of a collaboration with The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society to accelerate the development of mavorixafor for the treatment of Waldenström’s. The results of the study will share safety and dose escalation data and important efficacy signals, and we expect that these data will inform future FDA discussions regarding the potential registration trial in WM. Lastly, I would like to welcome 2 new additions to the X4 leadership team. Dr. Art Taveras started earlier this week as our new Chief Scientific Officer. Art is an experienced CSO, who is joining us from CoMET Therapeutics, a privately held company focused on CoEnzyme A science and intermediate metabolism, where he also served as CSO. Prior to his role at CoMET, he founded and was Chief Scientific Officer of Transform Therapeutics, where he led the discovery of a novel next-generation CXCR2 antagonist for the treatment of cancer. In addition, Art held key leadership roles and drug discovery at Biogen and at Schering-Plough earlier in his career. With his significant expertise in chemokine-related chemistries, decades of drug discovery experience and inspiring leadership, Art is an ideal fit to lead our R&D initiatives and further foster our evolution towards becoming a global rare disease company. In addition, we recently expanded our Board of Directors with the appointment of Alison Lawton, an industry veteran, who strengthens our Board's expertise across many strategic fronts. Ms. Lawton most recently served as CEO of Kaleido Biosciences and having previously served as a consulting Chief Operating Officer to the company and as a member of X4's Corporate Advisory Board. Alison brings a unique understanding of X4's core scientific and corporate goals. I look forward to working closely with her again. With that, I'll now turn the call over to Adam to discuss our financial results for the quarter. Adam?

Adam Mostafa

executive
#4

Thank you, Paula, and thanks to all of you on the call today. As presented in our press release this morning, I will summarize our financial activities and results for the third quarter of 2020. As of September 30, 2020, X4 had $90.7 million in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash. We continue to expect that our cash and cash equivalents will fund our operations into early 2022. Note this guidance does not include the $25 million in potential and contingent proceeds from our Hercules debt facility or any cash exercise proceeds from investors holding our outstanding warrants. Research and development expenses were $11.4 million for the third quarter of 2020 as compared to $8.6 million for the comparable period in 2019. R&D expenses included $1 million of certain noncash expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2020. General and administrative expenses were $5.6 million for the third quarter of 2020 as compared to $4.4 million for the comparable period in 2019. G&A expenses included $1.4 million of certain noncash expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2020. Finally, our net loss was $17.4 million for the third quarter of 2020 as compared to a net loss of $17.7 million for the comparable period in 2019. Net loss included $2.5 million of certain noncash expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2020. With that, let's open up the call for questions. Operator?

Operator

operator
#5

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Stephen Willey with Stifel.

Ellen Sands

analyst
#6

This is Ellen on for Steve. Just 2 quick questions from me. So first, you mentioned that you're focused on implementing home health visits for patients enrolled in the Waldenström’s trial in order to mitigate some of those effects from COVID. Is that same strategy being applied to the WHIM and SCN trials as well? And if so, how is that going?

Paula Ragan

executive
#7

Sure. Thanks, Ellen, for the question. So yes, the home health is being implemented for our studies where it makes sense for the chronic dosing, which is both WHIM and Waldenström’s. Obviously, patients are coming in over many months. For SCN, it makes less sense given the actual period of the study is only 2 weeks of treatment. So the home health is focused solely on WHIM and Waldenström’s.

Ellen Sands

analyst
#8

Okay. That makes sense. And then can you provide any updates regarding X4P-003 or X4P-002? Are either of these assets an IND-enabling studies at this point? And then also, can you just remind us how those assets are differentiated from each other? I know 002 is engineered to cross the blood-brain barrier. But I was just wondering if you could give a little more color on 003.

Paula Ragan

executive
#9

Great. No, thank you. We're happy to talk about our preclinical programs that are going really well. So 003 is the most advanced of the two. It is approaching IND-enabling studies. And then typically, after that, it's about a year to get into the clinic. So we're extremely excited with the profile that we've been seeing come together with this particular molecule. The differentiation between 003 and mavorixafor is that it does engineer out to the minor, but meaningful profile of mavorixafor. So for example, 003 does not have a food effect likely. Of course, we have to kind of prove that out, but so far, everything is looking very good. And we've also engineered out some of the drug-drug interaction profiles. Again, although minor, it certainly makes an important step forward for patients and clinicians to not have to worry about that. So that's moving forward very nicely. 002 is behind 003 and late lead optimization. And again, it's making good progress in terms of finding that right profile between brand exposure and plasma exposure, and we're really excited to continue to advance that to support further development for some of those serious brain cancers that we hope to address.

Operator

operator
#10

Our next question comes from Arlinda Lee with Canaccord.

Arlinda Lee

analyst
#11

I was hoping that you could provide an update on the enrollment for the WHIM syndrome? And then I also was curious on the preclinical programs, might we be expecting any data presentations on those any time in the near future?

Paula Ragan

executive
#12

Great. So just with respect to enrollment on WHIM as consistent with the past, we're not providing any specifics other than to say that we're on track with our top line data in 2022. And we are seeing patients to continue to enroll in the trial even despite the global pandemic. So we're really happy to see the patient's commitment and the site's commitment to continue to advance the trial. With respect to the preclinical program data, that's a great question, and it kind of segues very nicely to X4's recent announcement this week of hiring our Chief Scientific Officer, Art Taveras. We're very pleased to have someone with his tremendous experience in drug development and drug discovery. But I think while we don't have any specifics on rolling data around our preclinical program, stay tuned because I think we'll have some updates coming into next year.

Operator

operator
#13

Our next question comes from Joel Beatty with Citi.

Shawn Egan

analyst
#14

This is Shawn on for Joel. Two for me today. First on Waldenström’s and peer data in first half next year. Maybe just talk about how you plan to roll out that data? And then kind of getting into the weeds on maybe what the results could be. Aside from seeing any complete responses, are there any biomarkers that would give you confidence that any efficacy signals we see are due to your drug and not the combo? And then a follow-up on WHIM. And maybe could you talk about patient identification, where you're kind of at right there? And how many patients are on your EAP program right now?

Paula Ragan

executive
#15

Sure. So thanks, Shawn. Nice to hear from you. So I'll try to kind of walk through your questions. So in terms of the Waldenström’s data, the format of presenting the data, it's an open-label trial. We're making nice advances and our goal is to present a robust data set that people can interpret. And certainly, I want to do that in conjunction with our support of the key opinion leaders that are working with on our trial. So we're not yet sure of the format. But at the end of the day, we'll -- all of us will be aligned to make sure we can communicate and put the data in context of the overall treatment landscape. So stay tuned for sort of more specifics as they unfold. With respect to the results, though, it is important to help the world appreciate. So with ibrutinib alone, there's actually a very well-defined profile of responses in the first 3 to 6 months on single-agent treatment in these patients with the CXCR4 mutation. In fact, only about 1/3 of them get something called a major response, which means IgM drops greater than 50% of their baseline. So it's a pretty -- unfortunately, sad part for these patients, not many of them are getting those profound and deep IgM responses. So we will be showing data from patients on the first 3 to 6 months of dosing, and certainly we hope to beat that number of 30% with the data that we present the first half of next year, but stay tuned on the results as they unfold. And then finally, I think you mentioned WHIM patient ID. So we are continuing -- so with respect to the trial, again, I think we feel very confident that patients are there and waiting. There's obviously been some issues with having sites being open and able to enroll due to COVID, but we're -- with respect to the trial, we're incredibly confident. With respect to just the overall market, obviously, this is a long-term commitment for the company between our education and awareness through our medical science liaison teams, both in the U.S. and starting in Europe. We actually feel like we've been making great progress in getting the broader community to engage. We had some virtual booth at various conferences, where patients have come to visit us. So we feel like the word is getting out, and we're beginning to get a nice groundswell of people, thinking more broadly about women and their own patient populations in their clinics and also reaching the patient community directly. So we continue to make progress. We're excited about the long-term trajectory of the company in support of the hopeful commercial approval of mavorixafor for these patients.

Operator

operator
#16

Our next question comes from Mayank Mamtani with B. Riley Securities.

Sahil Kazmi

analyst
#17

This is Sahil on for Mayank. Congrats on all the progress. Just a few questions from us this morning. First off, as it relates to the Waldenström’s program and now expecting the data first half of next year. Is this more sort of enrollment related more than anything else in terms of monitoring responses? And should we still expect data on that 12 to 18 patient range?

Paula Ragan

executive
#18

Yes. So if I understood your question in the beginning, is a little bit of what's the shift or did I get that right -- sorry...

Sahil Kazmi

analyst
#19

No, that's exactly right.

Paula Ragan

executive
#20

Yes. So there's definitely just enrollment issues due to -- again, the U.S. -- the site is primarily U.S. with 2 ex U.S. sites. As you can appreciate with COVID, there are ebbing and flowing travel restrictions for patients depending on where they're located and also on their own comfort level, which is why the in-home health has been a good direction to alleviate that and why we feel confident about and are now enabling enrolling to be a little bit more consistent. In terms of the data, again, we just have to wait and see. It's an open-label trial. It's 12 to 18 patients, partly, it will be dependent upon dose and safety. And then as we see efficacy signals around the IgM level drops, we look forward to sharing that in the first half of next year.

Sahil Kazmi

analyst
#21

Great. That's helpful. And maybe just a brief follow-up as it relates to the SCN program. Can you just remind us, is this still a single site in Washington, I believe, on ClinicalTrials.gov. And then given the immunocompromised nature of the patients, how do you plan to sort of manage enrollment concerns, acknowledging that 14 days, is that short treatment window and maybe at-home visits don't make as much sense here?

Paula Ragan

executive
#22

Yes. So I think I've been pretty consistent since the start of COVID. The SCN trial has always been our trickiest because it is a translational research study. So from the patient lens perspective, it's something that they need to weigh risk benefits along with their clinicians on whether or not enrollment makes sense. University of Washington is a site that's open. We do have other sites that are open as well. I think there's always a delay on ClinicalTrials.gov in terms of that update. But at the end of the day, this is probably our trickiest study to try to balance respect and appreciation for the potential risk for these patients due to -- or added risk due to COVID, along with the investigators' enthusiasm for exploring this mechanism in these patients with this type of need. So again, stay tuned. It a 2021 story, and we'll look forward to just sort of sharpening that as we learn more.

Operator

operator
#23

Our next question comes from Arthur He with H.C. Wainwright.

Yu He

analyst
#24

This is Arthur for RK. So I just had a quick question or follow-up on the WM study. So could you guys remind us the dose level across the patient? And what can we raise through from the WHIM syndrome study in terms of the optimal dose level for the WM?

Paula Ragan

executive
#25

Sure. Great question. So let's just start with the current Phase III dose in WHIM, which is 400 milligrams once per day. And that drug is obviously treated as a single-agent therapy for WHIM. How we've crossed back into Waldenström’s is we're starting at 200 milligrams per day. The rationale behind that is that we do need to consider the potential, even though it's low drug-drug interactions between mavorixafor and ibrutinib to make sure that the exposure of those 2 drugs are not impacted in any direction by co-administering them. So hence, we started at a 200-milligram once per day dose level. And we're confident that, that's already a highly active level based even on what we saw in WHIM at 200 milligrams per day in healthy volunteers. You see a very nice robust bump in white blood cell mobilization and also the trough levels from known PK are certainly in the highly active range. So we feel good about where we're starting at in terms of being able to see clinical activity. After that starting dose, you just want to keep pushing the dose until you get to the classic kind of maximum dose per patient. So the dose escalation levels are then 400 and 600 after each patient clears the 200-milligram dose? Does that answer your question?

Yu He

analyst
#26

Yes.

Operator

operator
#27

Our next question comes from Laura Christianson with Cowen.

Laura Christianson

analyst
#28

On Waldenström’s, I was wondering if you could just talk a little bit more about how you expect mavorixafor might fit into the treatment paradigm if it's approved? Just what's the potential for mavorixafor to be used first line in combination with ibrutinib in CXCR4 positive MYD88 patients?

Paula Ragan

executive
#29

Sure. So our current study is exploring patients with any -- that are either treatment naive and up to 3 prior lines of treatment. So we will start to, at least in a small handful of patients, see what this drug potentially could do or a combination, I should say, as a frontline approach. So based on that data, I do think that there will begin to kind of gather the evidence of where this drug makes the most sense in terms of line of treatment. Currently in the U.S. and primarily in Europe, ibrutinib is more typically used in the second line, although it is approved for other lines of treatment. So there's a little bit of what is the current market and clinicians, how are they utilizing ibrutinib versus what will our data deliver. Certainly, the more robust data sets that's achieved with the combination will open clinicians' minds about how to use that combination. So I think there's opportunity. And then obviously, the data will then drive how clinicians will consider using the treatment for their patients.

Laura Christianson

analyst
#30

Perfect. And then just a quick one for Adam. I'm wondering how the stock purchase agreement that you recently put in place? How that might impact your expected cash runway?

Adam Mostafa

executive
#31

Yes. Thanks, Laura. So right now, I think our primary objective is to continue to track towards key milestones like Waldenström’s in the first half, and think about opportunistic ways to extend the runway based on that progress. The stock price agreement, I think, is a helpful tool in our financial tool belt to potentially utilized as we progress the business, but I think it represents a little bit more in the way of downside protection or insurance policy, if you will, given the external environment. So that's how I sort of stack it up in terms of our financial strategy.

Operator

operator
#32

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Zegbeh Jallah with ROTH Capital.

Zegbeh Jallah

analyst
#33

Apologies, going to ask one again about the preclinical pipeline with Art on board, as you mentioned. I just kind of want to know how you expect to kind of leverage his broad expertise, you plan to broaden out the pipeline or pursue additional indications with some of your early line preclinical programs?

Paula Ragan

executive
#34

Sure. So thanks so much. And yes, we feel incredibly fortunate to have Art join given his strong drug discovery experience and biology overlap in the chemokine world. So I think when we think about not only mavorixafor, but also our 2 preclinical programs. First, we really need to intend to operate and hit our near-term milestones. For example, I do think as the drug mavorixafor shows activity in Waldenström’s, there's a tremendous amount of support for CXCR4 more broadly in certain leukemias and lymphomas. I think between Art's experience in the biology and then complementing what we're learning in the clinic, that will really help us enable to prioritize how we can either develop mavorixafor and/or possibly 003 to expand the total market that we could potentially explore and hopefully benefit patients with our drug.

Zegbeh Jallah

analyst
#35

And then just a follow-up. I'm not even sure you can answer this one. But I think on the last call we had, you noted that you weren't capping patients that were pretreated or non-pretreated by the Waldenström’s study, which is going to try to enroll and see what you get. But can you provide any comments on if you're enrolling more pretreated patients? Or are you enrolling more naive patients?

Paula Ragan

executive
#36

No. There's no profile yet that we're really able to disclose. We'll certainly do that when we share the data. I would like to point back to the literature with respect to the double-mutant patients regardless of what line of therapy they're sort of address with they have this remaining unmet need. So I do think the consistency for the impact of having a CXCR4 mutation is important. I think that kind of creates a nice homogenous patient population for us to study, and we'll look forward to sharing that data in the first half of next year.

Operator

operator
#37

I am not showing any further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the call back over to Paula Ragan for closing remarks.

Paula Ragan

executive
#38

Thank you so much. Well, thank you again today for joining us. We sincerely appreciate your interest in X4 and look forward to continuing to provide updates on our progress as we approach multiple key catalysts in our business. If you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to reach out. Thank you again, and enjoy the rest of your day.

Operator

operator
#39

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete X4 Pharmaceuticals, Inc. transcript — plus 258,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to X4 Pharmaceuticals, Inc. earnings transcripts and 258,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.

More tools for stock research

OptionsBell: an unusual options activity scanner that tracks options flow across all US stocks and emails you when large trades appear in X4 Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or any ticker on your watchlist.

StockMarketScan: a stock screener with alerts: 24 pre-built screens refreshed every 5 minutes, watchlists and email notifications. Both offer API and MCP access and fair monthly pricing.