Aeroports de Paris SA (ADP) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

July 2, 2025

Euronext Paris FR Industrials Transportation Infrastructure special 38 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator

operator
#1

Good morning, and welcome to Groupe ADP. Today's call will be recorded. [Operator Instructions] I now hand over the call to Cecile Combeau, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Cecile Combeau

executive
#2

Thank you, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us upon on such short notice as we released last night preliminary information on H1 2025 results. I am here with Christelle Robillard, our CFO, will go through a few prepared remarks before taking your questions together with also Antoine Crombez, Deputy CFO. Before we start, and as usual, I remind you that certain information to be discussed on today's call is forward-looking and is subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. And for this, I refer you to the disclaimer statements included in our press release. And I will now leave the floor to Christelle.

Christelle Robillard

executive
#3

Thank you, Cecile, and good morning, everyone. Thank you again for joining us upon short notice. We indeed published last night some preliminary information regarding the H1 2025 results. I will be very short as there are only 4 takeaways for this release. First one, our operating performance is solid. As the semester just ended, our estimates for operating and financial performance in the first half are solid. And on this basis, we reaffirm all of our objectives for the full year 2025. Second highlight, below EBITDA, we see certain noncash effects linked to the abnormal foreign exchange move this semester. The magnitude of these effects in the first half and their combination with the accounting of the surplus of income tax will significantly deteriorate our net income. As specified in our release, we expect a negative impact on net income totaling EUR 150 million to EUR 180 million in the first half of 2025, of which EUR 60 million to EUR 70 million for the surplus of corporate tax implemented with the Finance Act for 2025 and EUR 90 million to EUR 110 million linked to FX variations. This brings me to the third highlight, the EUR 90 million to EUR 110 million FX-linked incomes are noncash, which means that the capacity of ADP to invest or to pay dividend remains unchanged. So fourth and last point, in this context, we will propose to the Board of Directors to adjust the distribution policy in order to offset the effect that this return may have on the dividend calculation for 2025. These are the main points I wanted to highlight, and I propose we now open the line for your questions.

Operator

operator
#4

[Operator Instructions] We will now take our first question from Graham Hunt of Jefferies.

Graham Hunt

analyst
#5

Maybe just -- I wanted to ask on keeping on FX point. You haven't mentioned this in the statement, but can you speak to any impacts on FX that you're seeing in your domestic operations in Paris? I just wondered if there was also any impact you've seen on -- particularly on weakening U.S. dollar on Paris retail?

Christelle Robillard

executive
#6

Yes, for sure. Thank you, Graham, for this question. So for that question, basically, the message is the same as the one I conveyed during the first quarter of the year. So first of all, you've seen that we have confirmed our annual guidance in term of spend per pax. So next time, Paris spend per pax between 4% to 6% in 2025 compared to 2023. This means that what we are seeing for the moment is totally in line with our expectations and that we are not enduring major or significant effects of the FX variation in the domestic operation and in the level of spend per pax. So we are confident to confirm even if we continue to monitor closely the situation. Maybe I can let Cecile complete a little bit this performance.

Cecile Combeau

executive
#7

Yes, you all have in mind that spend per pax in the first quarter was strong with EUR 33.4 delivered, which is 2% growth compared to the first quarter. So a solid start to the year. If you remember the sequential evolution of spend per pax last year, it was very strong in the first part of the year plus 7% in the first half, but only up 3% in the second part of the year. As previously commented, the slowdown had reflected some several effects, which are actually specific to ADP, it's internal. So rebasing effect since July 2024 when some international airlines choose to relocate from Terminal 1 to Terminal 2AC. So we expect that to continue to impact in the first half of 2025. So it's included in the Q1. We also have the disruptions of the retail areas in Terminal 2E, Hall K, which is undergoing some works in the retail area and which are actually intensifying in the second quarter. And the third item, which is internal, is the normalization of advertising activity, which is taken into account in the spend per pax. We recorded, as you'll remember, an outstanding performance in 2024 before and during the Olympics. And so this is also expected to weigh on somewhat in the performance. But again, including all of these items. And so far, no material sign of impact linked to USD weakness or euro appreciation, that gives us the full comfort with our spend per pax guidance for this year of spend per pax growing between 4% to 6% compared to 2023, meaning that we are expecting this year, spend per pax between EUR 31.8 and EUR 32.4.

Graham Hunt

analyst
#8

And can I just ask -- for my second question, I just wanted to ask on the dividend policy proposal. How are you thinking about that in terms of -- is it -- this is just for 2025? Is there any -- just to confirm that. And it applies to both the tax surcharges here and the FX. So if we were to see taxes extended, for example, into the 2026 budget, there wouldn't be any consideration for that in this proposal. Is that fair?

Christelle Robillard

executive
#9

Yes. So on this question, so you understand the global objective and the proposal that we will make to the Board of Directors to adjust, indeed, the distribution policy as to offset the effect and especially the noncash effects. You understand that there are some older FX variation are noncash contrary to the surplus of income tax, which you know previously and which is -- which has a cash effect. So we will propose a new policy once again, to offset those effects that could have an impact on the dividend calculation for 2025. Clearly, at this stage, it's too early to make any comment on how and the modalities of this compensation. We are studying all options to put a proposal for the Board, and it will be the Board who will have the final decision. Indeed, we intend just to target something for the 2025 distribution policy. And of course, we will come back to you on that topic after the Board of the 13th of July.

Operator

operator
#10

[Operator Instructions] We will now move on to our next question from Elodie Rall of JPMorgan.

Elodie Rall

analyst
#11

I was wondering if you generally have seen a bit more softness from U.S. traffic. You referred to that last week. So I was wondering if it's something that you've seen. That's my first question. And second, if you have any update on the conversations you've had with the regulator regarding the next regulation plan? And it's in this discussion, you'd include protection against tax changes indeed in the next -- in the 5-year or 10-year period in order to protect the group.

Christelle Robillard

executive
#12

Okay. Thank you, Elodie, for your question. So regarding pricing, maybe first element. Again, as for the spend per pax, you saw that we are confirming our annual guidance of Paris traffic up between 2.5% to 4% in 2025 compared to 2024. So that means that what we are seeing now is in line with our expectation in terms of capacity and what we see in terms of reservation and schedule with airlines. So speaking especially indeed on the traffic with the United States, we are not seeing any major impact also at the moment, the reservation and the schedule are quite in line for the summer, maybe just a slight decrease at the end of the fall, but really something that is not significant at this stage and once again, which enabled us to confirm the annual guidance. Regarding your second question. So the modality of protection in tax FX, if I understand well, on the FX changes that could affect our accounts and how we will mitigate and take them into account in the framework of our negotiation and the next economic regulation agreement, maybe what is important to have in mind here is that as you have seen all this impact are more linked to our international subsidiaries, TAV from one side for currency exchange laws for deferred tax laws and GMR through especially and mainly the FCCB. So when we are negotiating for Paris, the only impact that FX can have is through indeed the operational performance, referring to Graham previous question. And once again, for the moment, we are not seeing any impact. So for this specific topic of FX variation, normally, it's not something that concerns the regulated scope. So we don't expect to have any specific protection regarding the FX evolution in the economic regulation agreement. But as I said, more globally for the next economic regulation agreement, we will foresee indeed some clauses to protect more generally on some variation, inflation, for instance. And for that, we will have different kinds of protection. The first kind of protection is what I call the adjustment factor. For instance, on the traffic, we will have a base case scenario. And if ever the traffic is beyond or below a specific range, in this case, there can be specific adjustments on the tariffs through bonus or malus. This is the first layout of protection. Second layout of protection, some revision scenario. Once again, the law itself foresee a revision at your force and we will have to specify how this revision mechanism is working. And thirdly, out of protection. You know it. It was the one we used for economic regulation; and number three, the termination in case of force majeure. But on the specific point of FX evolution, this is not something really linked to the regulated scope.

Elodie Rall

analyst
#13

The tax surcharge, if it were to be like an ongoing -- like if we were to see more tax surcharge prices in the next few years, but I guess it's the same as protection, right?

Christelle Robillard

executive
#14

Yes, exactly. On the specific question regarding tax, indeed, we will have to foresee the different scenario, and it could enter, for instance, in the revision scenario. This is something we have to work internally and to specify depending on the magnitude of the impact of the tax evolution that could be put into place during the economic regulation agreement.

Operator

operator
#15

And we will now move on to our next question from Marcin Wojtal of Bank of America.

Marcin Wojtal

analyst
#16

So my question is on the impact of the increase of the French corporate tax. You are guiding EUR 60 million to EUR 70 million in H1, but the guidance you originally gave for the full year, I believe, was EUR 110 million to EUR 120 million. So my question is, is that guidance that was given originally for the full year, is it still valid? Or now the impact for the full year is expected to be higher? Because if I compare these 2, it looks like there is some sort of skew toward H1 and typically, in almost all of the earnings metrics, H1 is a smaller percentage of the full year and H2 is a higher percentage. Or is there some sort of seasonality adjustment in that specific tax?

Christelle Robillard

executive
#17

Yes. Thank you, Marcin. So indeed, you're right. So we have explained that we are expecting a surplus of EUR 60 million to EUR 70 million for the first half. And indeed, as a reminder, we had given an estimate of EUR 110 million to EUR 120 million for the full year. The first half is slightly heavier due to the accounting method applicable. Indeed, there is a portion related to 2024 in this surplus of income tax. And this specific amount is accounted for in the first half of 2025 contrary to the portion based on the 2025 income, which is recognized over the course of 2025. So all in all, the amount for the first part of the year is higher, than the one we will enjoy during the second half of the year.

Operator

operator
#18

And we will now take our next question from Eric Lemarie of CIC.

Eric Lemarié

analyst
#19

Yes. I was wondering -- just a very basic question. I was wondering, is there any specific reason why you decided to change the time, the day and the speakers of these pre-close call because it was initially scheduled for tomorrow with the IR team. I know it's with you this morning. I was wondering if there is any reason behind that. And if you plan in the future to continue with this group pre-close call combined with a press release publication, so just before the blackout period.

Christelle Robillard

executive
#20

Yes, yes. For sure, we can clarify this. So there will still be a pre-close call. This conference call with a short notice was due to the fact -- is totally an exceptional event due to the fact that we had disclosed yesterday this specific preliminary information regarding H1 2025 results. Given the magnitude of the impact of FX evolution, we considered that it was better and more transparent to the market to give you as information straight away. So we organize this specific call to explain the elements regarding all those impacts. But of course, we are maintaining in parallel the pre-close call with the IR team, and we -- it's now something that we have organized for the last result, and we are intending to maintain that, but these are 2 different process.

Eric Lemarié

analyst
#21

Okay. So tomorrow, it's still -- we still got a call with...

Christelle Robillard

executive
#22

Yes, of course. We might do it a bit shorter and not address again things that we just discussed like spend per pax again, things like that.

Operator

operator
#23

And we will now take our next question from Harishankar of Deutsche Bank.

Harishankar Ramamoorthy

analyst
#24

It's Hari from DB. Firstly, would you be able to split the FX impact into the 3 buckets that you've highlighted in the press release on TRY depreciation or the INR depreciation. And secondly, if I read through the Turkish depreciation impact, it looks like you're talking about from the companies that are having the lira asset, which is the currency and that's issued in foreign currency, the depreciation leading to an increase in the value of these debts in their accounts, which is understandable. But presumably, you would be converting this back into EUR terms for ADP reporting? And shouldn't that actually be neutral? I just couldn't get my head around it.

Christelle Robillard

executive
#25

Sorry, the line was really not so good, so very, very hard for us to understand. But if I get some of your -- some elements in your question, so indeed, we have 3 effects, 3 major effects in those FX variation, either direct or indirect on our account. So the first -- the 2 first effects adding to the depreciation of the Turkish lira with a currency exchange loss. So just to explain, this is totally detailed in our press release, but for Turkish company, with the Turkish lira as their functional currency and which have issued debt in foreign currency. So that means euro or USD, the depreciation of the Turkish lira lead to the increase in the value of the debt in their account. So this has an impact on financial results or on profit and loss from equity-accounted company when it's not a fully integrated companies. Second effect for Turkish companies with the euro as their functional currency is the depreciation and this is really the new effect that we are seeing for the 2 past months. The depreciation of the Turkish lira is now stronger than the local inflation measured by the internal hyperinflation index. And in this case, the value of the future tax benefits decreasing, leading to the negative impact on our account. And this has an impact -- and I guess this is answering, I hope, to your question, this has an impact on deferred tax loss. So this is -- this is clearly an indirect impact through deferred tax loss. And then the third effect is the Indian rupee depreciation. And here, the major effect concerned the FCCB, which is euro denominated and which lead to an increase in the level of debt in GMR Airports account. And for this, as it is in the equity-accounted companies, there are no direct impact for me in the income tax.

Harishankar Ramamoorthy

analyst
#26

Understood. Apologies about the quality of the line. Hopefully, it's better now. Maybe on the first part, any broad bucket between what is the value in each of these items?

Christelle Robillard

executive
#27

The split of each item. So no, sorry, we are not disclosing it. We give a full range. But all in all, it's kind of half and half between Turkish lira and Indian rupee, but we don't give the specific bucket for each item because its estimate for the moment, it has to be confirmed within the final result. So it's better not to clarify and we are starting the process of closing. So we will be able maybe to give more color when we have the final figure for first half. But keep in mind that it's -- at this stage, our estimation is half-half between Turkish lira effect -- the 2 first elements, sorry, and the effect regarding Indian rupee.

Operator

operator
#28

And we will now take our next question from Cristian Nedelcu of UBS.

Cristian Nedelcu

analyst
#29

The first question, you signed a long-term agreement with Air France regarding developing the Paris Airports. I wanted to check if you step back, are there other airlines in particular that you believe can drive traffic growth over the next years in Paris? So any other airlines that are expressing interest to increase their capacity in a meaningful way in Charles De Gaulle and Orly? The second question in terms of the regulatory proposal, is there any time line that you can give us? Are we expecting any decision from the regulator on the WACC or any -- or maybe if you can tell us a bit more when you think you will present your economic proposal for the next regulatory period? And the third one, if you allow me, there's a few press articles talking about Hyderabad spending around $1.6 billion on CapEx until the end of this decade. I don't know if you can comment if that information is accurate. But in particular, I'd be curious, will they need to raise more debt to finance that CapEx program in Hyderabad? Or is that financed organically through for their free cash flow generation? In the past, you've mentioned there's not a lot of free cash flow generation until the end of the decade. So I was curious if you can clarify that.

Christelle Robillard

executive
#30

Yes. So regarding the partnership with Air France, just to remind you that indeed, we have signed an agreement to really reinforce our position and competitive at the hub level in a context where there is important competition with other international hub, especially in the Middle East. It was important for us to have a specific agreement with Air France to work on some specific measures to reinforce our position and our competitivity regarding other airports. It is clearly a separate process and the process of the negotiation of the economic regulation agreement. There are some quick wins with Air France but with no impact in terms of no commitment, in terms of CapEx or tariff, which will be negotiated through the economic regulation agreement. Regarding your question, are there other airline interested in increasing their capacity in Paris? Yes, this is something we are also working on. And in the framework of the negotiation for the next economic regulation agreement, we are speaking with the main airlines to see what could be their need and to see what we could envisage specifically for other important airlines. The economic regulation agreement concerned really all the airlines. So we have to find the best balance as possible to answer to each party's interest. So regarding your second question for the economic regulation agreement, the time line we gave for the first quarter is unchanged. That is to say that we intend to submit a proposal at the end of this year, 2025, to have 1-year negotiation with the French state to get the approval of the regulator, but also to discuss with airline with the final objective to implement the new regulation agreement at the beginning of 2027 at the latest. Regarding the WACC, there is no change since our last disclosure. We are expecting to have an opinion as a regulator within the framework of the 2026 tariff process from one side. And we will have also specific opinion given by the regulator at the beginning -- expected at the beginning of 2026 for the estimation of the WACC for the ERA period. So this is something expected more at the beginning of 2026 and nothing new should be known before this. Maybe I better let Antoine answer.

Antoine Crombez

executive
#31

Yes. Thank you, Christelle. So briefly on Hyderabad, I guess that what you are referring to is probably some numbers or rumors around numbers that are linked with the ongoing consultation of Hyderabad on its next control period for the tariffs. And at this stage, it's a bit too early to know the exact amount and the phasing of this announced for Hyderabad. Nevertheless, it is clear that if you look at the traffic forecast for Hyderabad, which is very dynamic and very dynamic, in particular, on the international traffic, which is also very contributive. We know that there will be probably indeed by the end of the decade, a new CapEx cycle to accommodate these traffic growth in the -- at the airport. Having said that, Hyderabad has a very good, as you know, financial profile and has -- that's a very positive news for GMR Airports. Hyderabad has already started this year to distribute dividends to its mother company, GMR Airports, hence generating -- starting to generate also very positive cash flow to the holding level. And that also strengthens the fact that -- and we reiterate this target that we have already given to the market and which is also aligned with GMR and our partner to have a positive free cash flow generation at GMR Airports level by the end of the decade and potentially dividend distribution at the end of the decade. So that is confirmed regardless of the CapEx that may occur in Hyderabad.

Operator

operator
#32

And we will now take our next question from Andrew Lobbenberg of Barclays.

Andrew Lobbenberg

analyst
#33

I just wondered if you could give any comments on the announced ATC strike for tomorrow. It's obviously not a complete shock for a French ATC to go on strike in July, whether you are expecting a worse or better season this year? And then just whether you can offer any comments on some of the volatility we've seen around the discussion of potential increased taxes on aviation, which I think were out there in the market and then were slightly downplayed by the Prime Minister's office yesterday, I think.

Christelle Robillard

executive
#34

Yes. Thanks, Andrew. So regarding the strike that will occur in the days to come, it's clearly too early to tell how the cancellation could be reported or could be delayed or how the traffic could be split over the days ahead. So clearly, yes, too early to see the consequences of the movement. But all in all, once again, it's not something that would lead us to change our guidance. We confirm our annual guidance. So no expected impact. We are always confident about our annual level. So at this stage, no expected impact regarding this specific strike that will occur in the days to come. Regarding your second question, yes, on the tax. So indeed, you know that we have gone through important tax increases over the past few months. We have mentioned today the surplus regarding income tax, which is a temporary tax at this stage. You also know the impact we have gone through because of long distance infrastructure tax. For this, we have managed to offset all the regulated impact of this tax, that is to say, 75% of the total amount, and total amount estimated at EUR 130 million. We have offset it through 2 tariff increase in 2024 and 2025. There has been also the impact on the ticket prices. So here, it's more an indirect effect for us because it can have an impact on the traffic level if the ticket prices are deemed too high by passengers. For the moment, once again, we have not at our level seen any major impact on the volume of traffic. It's maybe not the case for regional airports and small airlines. There have been some rumors in the press indeed that there could be a new evolution regarding new increase of taxes. Clearly, here, again, sorry, but it's too early to tell. It's just a rumor in the press at this stage. Of course, we will monitor the situation because this is something that has clearly an impact on our accounts. And so we will monitor during all the process of the negotiation of the Finance Bill Act.

Operator

operator
#35

That was our last question. I will now hand it back to Cecile Combeau for closing remarks.

Cecile Combeau

executive
#36

Thank you. So we can indeed close this call. Thank you all again for joining us on short notice. I will briefly remind that the quiet period will start on Monday, July 7. So as indicated earlier during the call, we intend to host tomorrow with Eliott at the usual group pre-close call, which is scheduled at 11 a.m. The objective, as you know, is to remind all key public information and business trends before entering the quiet periods. So the results themselves will be published on the 30th after market close and the conference call with management will be held on the following day, July 31, at 11 a.m. Paris time. And with that, I thank you again for having logged to this call and wish you a good day. Thank you.

Operator

operator
#37

Thank you. This concludes today's call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Aeroports de Paris SA transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Aeroports de Paris SA earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.