Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. (ALGM) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

May 31, 2023

NASDAQ US Information Technology Semiconductors and Semiconductor Equipment conference_presentation 31 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Joshua Buchalter

analyst
#1

Okay. All right. Good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining us. I'm Josh Buchalter, semiconductor analyst at TD Cowen. Thanks for making it to the afternoon sessions of Day 1 of the 51st Annual TMT Conference. Very pleased to be joined by Derek D'Antilio, of Allegro MicroSystems. I think some people in the room are probably familiar with your background in the companies, but maybe you can spend a couple of minutes introducing yourself and the Allegro story.

Derek D'Antilio

executive
#2

Sure. Thank you, Josh. Always a good conference. So I'm Derek D'Antilio, the CFO of Allegro MicroSystems. I joined about 1.5 years ago, I spent the last 25 years or so either auditing semiconductor companies or semiconductor capital equipment companies or as a senior finance or CFO roles at semiconductor companies largely in the Boston area. Allegro MicroSystems is an interesting company. We're a global leader in sensing and power solutions, integrated circuits, largely serving the automotive market. So 70% of our business is automotive, 20% is industrial, we'll talk about some of the industrial pieces, and then 10% consumer. The company went public on the NASDAQ about 2.5 years, but we actually have 96 years of history starting off at Sprague Electric in Wisden, Massachusetts. We had a fab at 1965 many years before, many semiconductor companies are even founded. So happy to be here as a public company focused on the e-mobility space and some of the more exciting areas of industrial.

Joshua Buchalter

analyst
#3

Thank you for that intro. And by the way, this is meant to be interactive. If anyone's got questions in the audience, please feel free to wave me down or throw something at me, and we'll get you a mic or just yell loudly. I guess, Derek, to start the conversation again, we get a lot of questions about trying to unpack what's Allegro's technology differentiation. It's magnetic sensing and power ICs are difficult ones to point to a specific metric. Maybe you could spend a couple of minutes explaining what sets Allegro apart, why you've been able to win so much business in the auto market, in particular, what makes -- in many of your applications are sole sourced. What drives that?

Derek D'Antilio

executive
#4

Yes, great question. So in terms of size company with our [formal] competitors, Allegro is probably a smaller semiconductor company approaching $1 billion in revenue. But what sets us apart is our extreme focus on two applications, magnetic sensing, we've been involved in magnetic sensing and a leader in magnetic sensing for over 30 years; and certain discrete power ICs. And in the magnetic sensing world and in power, we have two sort of technology differentiators. One is our underlying wafer technology. We're a fabless company working with three outside fabs, which uses their process technology, but our own proprietary technology to put magnetic sensing on top of a CMOS layer. So we're embedding memory, magnetic sensing and CMOS all in the same chip. So it's an integrated chip, smaller, monolithic chip that's more efficient. And that's important for higher resolution, accuracy, energy measurement. So when you think about automotive, for example, we're helping drive efficiencies, particularly extending range in electric vehicles by having current -- measuring current and driving current throughout the automobile. The second piece of that is packaging, proprietary packaging. Our packaging has been under hood for 30-plus years in automotive. Can extend extreme heat, extreme conditions and purpose-built ASICs, and packaging for the automotive suppliers, that allows us to be single-sourced at many of our automotive opportunities. In fact, that's not very uncommon in automotive, working with the Tier 1 suppliers who supply the automotive industry, designing systems or steering systems, braking systems, battery management systems, having an ASIC purpose-built chip and package for their application allows us to be sole sourced in many of those opportunities.

Joshua Buchalter

analyst
#5

And I guess what allowed -- when you go to the business, you get asked this question all the time, what allows a customer to select Allegro? Is it the resolution? Is it the packaging? Is it a history of reliability? What is sort of -- I know it's all of those, but can you talk to me -- talk through some of the pitch you make when you're going to customers?

Derek D'Antilio

executive
#6

It's a great question. So the first entree really is having 30-plus years of experience dealing with automotive customers, that gets us in the door. So we're having technology discussions with the OEMs who are then specking us in with the Tier 1s and pulling us through. The second piece of that is having -- our entire supply chain is automotive grade from design through the fab, through our testing that we all do internally. So having those discussions around reliability and happen to have 10 years' worth of reliability data at a minimum also is helpful with those customers. And then the real piece on the technology side, I would say, particularly in the sensing side is the resolution and the accuracy and be able to manage the current such you can get more range out of an electric vehicle, where you can control the current going from the 400-volt or the 800-volt battery in an electric vehicle down to the other subsystems in a car and make sure you're not losing current. So having less lost current sensors is very important.

Joshua Buchalter

analyst
#7

And can you talk about how some of -- I mean your history is in magnetic sensing. What are you bringing from the sensing side into -- what are some of the similar qualities on the power side that's allowing you to win business? And can you talk about some of the key verticals there, I guess, outside of autos in addition to what's going on within the vehicle?

Derek D'Antilio

executive
#8

Sure. so actually, before sensing, Allegro was a power company. And so part of our history has been a power electronics company for the past 75 years. It's been in business since 1926 as big, started off as a power company. So we have significant experience in power electronics, high power, in particular. And by taking some of the same concepts of the monolithic integrated wafer technology, the proprietary packaging, we've been able to win business in certain power applications, both in auto -- and then to Josh's point, outside of auto, we have about 21% of our business is to industrial. And industrial means different things to different people. Our industrial is very focused on applications where the same use cases are available for harnessing power, capturing power, driving power and retaining power. So things like clean energy, solar inverters, DC-to-DC conversion and solar, DC fast charging. Industrial automation is another piece of that industrial, data center automation in terms of data center fan cooling, power drivers. So a lot of exciting applications within our industrial business. That also have projections for relatively fast growth over the next several years.

Joshua Buchalter

analyst
#9

I want to shift gears for a moment, and this semiconductor cycle has been unique from my vantage in that the end markets are moving at very different times. Your for you -- mostly better, 70% auto exposed, and that's sort of the one vertical that has yet to see any signs of cracking. I would just love to hear what are you seeing out there in the business environment, both within that and outside of autos. And any signs of any sort of weakening in end demand is we've gotten a lot of concern about [China] EV weakness and vehicle affordability, but it would be helpful to hear your context given how your long track record and exposure to autos.

Derek D'Antilio

executive
#10

Sure. Yes. And as Josh mentioned, I've unfortunately or fortunately been through many decades of semiconductor cycles, mostly consumer type cycles or data center-driven cycles. I think within the automotive market, what's kind of interesting is, today, we're -- worldwide, we're producing about 81 million or 82 million vehicles. That's down from 95 million back in 2018, which was the peak. Many estimates by S&P and others project that will get back to 90 million, call it, over the next 3 or 4 years. There might be some quarterly perturbations. But what's really driving that is the EV penetration. So in many countries like the United States and Japan, penetration of electric vehicles is less than 10%. In Europe, it's far ahead of that. So what we're seeing is a bit of a bifurcation of course, between consumer and auto. But even within auto, we're seeing a bifurcation between the growth rates in EV, which we think are secular and pervasive. And just because interest rates increase, I don't see automakers slowing down the production of EV. Could there be quarters when ICE vehicles sell less or even vehicles in total? Possibly. But we don't see that slowing down the production of EV over the next several years. Outside of auto, we're seeing signs of the typical cycle. So for example, in data center, we have products for the data center, There, we've seen some inventory build in the channel. We made a decision to stop shipping into that space for a little while until that inventory kind of digest itself through the channel. And then in the consumer business, which is about 10% of our business with some interesting applications that use the same applications, for example, the [Roomba] does some of the same things with autonomy, we have seen that business line declined by 4% in Q4 and probably would have declined more if we weren't shipping from some delinquent backlog. So we are seeing the same consumer dynamics a little bit in the data center, but auto has held up really good, particularly driven by EV.

Joshua Buchalter

analyst
#11

And I think a key question there is how is the pricing environment, both within autos and industrials. You've been successfully able to pass on higher input costs all through the last couple of years as inflations ticked up. Any signs of that changing? Any differences in your customers' conversations now versus a couple of years ago?

Derek D'Antilio

executive
#12

Yes. So I look at that -- I look at pricing and channels. The channel is the distribution channel, which is sort of the pass on the pricing through the distribution channel. That's market-based pricing. It goes up with the market. It probably comes down at the market at some point. We haven't seen that yet. In the OEM side of the business, that's really ASIC pricing, strategic pricing to customers, purpose-built ASICs, and that side of the business, it's market-based pricing. We don't let our salespeople see the cost side of the equation. So it's not a cost-plus side of the business. So that's really about providing products with a higher feature set, keep releasing new products with higher SPs. The wafer cost remains the same. So we've been pretty successful in improving gross margins by really churning that mix over there. So on that side of the business, I expect pricing to remain relatively sticky. On the distribution side of the business, that is much more market-driven and has historically been as well. So we've got the upside of that. Haven't seen the downside yet, but I think many companies probably will.

Joshua Buchalter

analyst
#13

How does mix play in there? Because you've been, I would say, arguably leaned in the heaviest to XMR sensors. And maybe you could talk to what benefits that brings and what that does both to your customers and to your own internal mix on your financials?

Derek D'Antilio

executive
#14

Sure. So today, the magnetic sensing market is largely hall effect technology, which has been around for 30-plus years, right? And we're the leader in Hall effect technology and magnetic sensing. We're one of the few companies have gone to the next generation of XMR technology. And what that does is it brings essentially about 8x the resolution. And that's important when you start to think about ADAS features when you want to have an angle sensor turning your electromechanical steering to the right place you want to star or to a mechanical braking. So when you need really precise applications. That's where XMR and TMR becomes really valuable. We expect the ASPs there will be higher, and so the variable contribution module will be higher there. That's still in its infancy in terms of the percentage of our overall revenue, but there's not many companies who have that, and that's part of our innovation business. So we believe that's the next iteration of magnetic sensing.

Joshua Buchalter

analyst
#15

And competitively, are you seeing your peers invest in XMR [indiscernible]? And I guess your fabless and many of your competitors are IDMs. Does that enable you to move quicker? Is it -- on the flip side does that allow them to capture more margins? I would love to hear you talk about the interplay.

Derek D'Antilio

executive
#16

Yes, it's kind of interesting. So we became a fabless company just 4 years ago. We were an IDM with two fabs and two back-end facilities back in 2017, 2018. We spun off one of the fab. We still own 30% of that one, but it's not on our books. The other fab we closed. We have one back-end facility. And the primary reason we're doing that were really twofold. One, managing a fab, you have a lot of fixed costs. You have to worry about utilization. But the second reason is, or the more important reason is, it allows us to focus exclusively on customer innovation. We now have an office of the CTO. We focus entirely on design innovation, proprietary packaging and don't have to really worry about spending all of our time on wafer tech side of things. We have wafer tech designers but that's done at the fab level. So that's the first piece. The second piece is, when I think about our IDM peers, right, I'm sure they have to deal with utilization levels and understand how that's going to impact that gross margin and can they be more competitive on pricing. So at some point, when utilization levels drop, they probably will get more competitive on pricing.

Joshua Buchalter

analyst
#17

Got it. Maybe we could talk through, I guess, some numbers behind the content opportunity. You've laid out -- I think it's going from $20 to $60 or of a basic internal combustion engine to -- with EV and ADAS content uplifts and then even higher with the acquisition of Heyday. I know it's a collection of singles and doubles, unlike some other verticals in analog semis. Can you walk through some of the, I guess, bigger, chunkier sockets within there? What gives you confidence in that almost tripling of the content opportunity? And then longer term, when should we expect -- maybe you can walk through what is Heyday? And how should we expect that to layer into the model?

Derek D'Antilio

executive
#18

So we believe our SAM on a typical ICE vehicle is about $39. That goes to 60 on a typical electric vehicle, and that's all in, including Level 1 and Level 2 ADAS features. And the big pieces driving that really are as a vehicle electrifies and you put an electric powertrain in the number of current sensors more than doubles. So having potential opportunity for 40 current sensors, which is our main product on the magnetic sensing market more than doubles to 40. The second piece of that is when you look at ADAS features, it's all about redundancy and failsafe opportunities. So the number of angle sensors, speed sensors, current sensors, all at least double. So think about being on an airplane. You want to have multiple redundant failsafe systems. Those are the ADAS systems. When your car starts doing things for you like lane-keeping assist or self-parking, the car has to have multiple failsafe systems. So there's a number of redundancy in a lot of our products there in terms of motor drivers driving the systems. Heyday Integrated Circuits, we bought that company in September of 2022, very small technology company, kind of an [acqui-hire] in France, about 12 engineers. They make isolated gate drivers for high-power applications. What that does is it helps isolate high power over 1,000 volts and drive that power to fast switching devices, so gallium nitride and silicon carbide. We don't make either of those two substrates, but it drives it to those two. So the opportunity set there is about another $30 in SAM on an electric vehicle in the battery inverter really working on a reference design with the gallium nitrate switch manufacturers in the silicon carbide switch manufacturers.

Joshua Buchalter

analyst
#19

I guess Heyday is the goal is to be the high-voltage gate driver. And a lot of the peers who do power discretes are also investing in modules. What's the differentiation that allows Heyday to break into that module or break into the inverter? I would love to hear you talk about the differentiation there.

Derek D'Antilio

executive
#20

Yes. It's a great product. I was there in France a couple of months ago, and I saw their product. It's about 1/3 of the size on the board of the competitors' products. It's a lot more efficient in harnessing power and driving power. So they came up with some really unique technology, and they presented that technology at Electronica in Munich in the fall, and there was a lot of demand. In fact, that business was brought to us by one of the large OEMs in Germany, one of our customers. So those are the kind of acquisitions I really like because you know you can sell at the existing customer base when they bring it to you. And we have a ton of expertise in power. We put our -- the gentleman who ran our power business and build our power business to a $400 million business is now in charge of this high-power business that includes Heyday integrated technologies. And so having that expertise on top of their technology, we're pretty excited about it.

Joshua Buchalter

analyst
#21

So I guess we're going to move outside the car. You talked about industrial, means a lot of different things to a lot of people. Some of the key verticals you've highlighted are charging infrastructure, renewables and data center power. Are those meaningful enough yet where they can start to move the needle on your consolidated results? How should we rank order which one of those are contributing the most now and which are the ones you're most excited about? And maybe walk through some of the content opportunities and how that compares to the numbers you were just giving for on the vehicle.

Derek D'Antilio

executive
#22

Sure. So when I think about the industrial, it's now 21% of our business, it's actually grown faster than our auto business, coming off a smaller base of numbers. So it's about $200 million business. And the three pieces there really are clean energy. It's really been driven by solar so far. In its infancy, though, and one of the more exciting parts is fast charging stations, DC fast charging stations, where we think there's an opportunity of up to $400 in content on a DC fast charging station for current sensors, motor drivers, angle sensors. So that's a really exciting space. The overall clean energy space, solar has been great for us and continues to be. The second piece in there is industrial automation. So using a lot of the same features for electrification and particularly autonomy, angle sensors, speed sensors and industrial automation, industrial robotics has been a really interesting business. When you start to think about places like China where the working age demographic is starting to decline pretty rapidly. So that's been an interesting business for us. And the third piece is data center. So data center efficiency, fans for the cooling systems, replacement of the back plane and a server rack from 12-volt to 48 volts. So those are the three big pieces. And what's interesting is we've sold those products through distribution, the same products developed for automotive through distribution to industrial, and a lot of that just happened. But recently, we've had a focus on that. So our sales team now is focused on selling into what we call our strategic focus areas. So e-mobility in the select areas of industrial. So they get paid to win sockets in those areas now. So we have a real focus on that. We've put somebody in charge of it in Europe. We just had our first Clean Tech Summit internally in Europe at Allegro. So it's a real focus market for us, whereas before, we sold those products through distribution. People pulled them through distribution. Now we're driving demand.

Joshua Buchalter

analyst
#23

Is it the same competitors that you see in vehicle that are going after these markets? And any changes in, I guess, customer priorities that would make you better or worse suited for the non-auto applications as you start to expand outside the car?

Derek D'Antilio

executive
#24

I think on the sensor side, we're seeing a lot of the same competitors. So for example, in China, when we look at some of the sensor side, it's the same cast of Europe -- large European competitors we compete with. On the data center side, it's largely power applications. So there's a set of U.S. public companies that we compete with their different set. A lot of them deal in consumer or data center. So similar types of competitors, different customer set.

Joshua Buchalter

analyst
#25

Maybe you could -- you're CFO, so maybe you should probably ask you a couple of financial questions. You -- there's some moving parts within your gross margins near term and you also recently laid out a longer-term target model for margins. Maybe you can walk through what are the moving parts. There's a currency aspect that was inflating results last year. What's driving the step down? And maybe you could walk through the core underlying gross margin, how that's trended and what you expect for this year.

Derek D'Antilio

executive
#26

Sure. So we came into FY '23 or our March 31 year-end. So our FY '23 started a year ago with about a 55% non-GAAP gross margin. We finished the year at about 50 -- close to 58%, 58% non-GAAP in Q3, 57.8% in Q4. Both of those quarters had some favorable foreign exchange, and the foreign exchange is specific to the Philippine peso. We have one large facility with almost 4,000 people in the Philippines. So it's all the fixed cost in the Philippines. Most of our business, the sales are in U.S. dollars; wafers, U.S. dollars, but the Philippine costs are in the peso. So that drove between 100 and 150 basis points of sort of favorability in Q3 and Q4. If you take that out, it's kind of in that mid-56% range. Q4 also had some benefit from, I would call it, channel mix. So about 43% of our Q4 sales were into the distribution channel. And typically, it's around 40. And then gross margins through the channel are a lot higher than direct OEM based on volume. So normalizing those two things, our guidance for Q1 is 56%, which is where we expect it to be, about 100 basis points better than we were entering the year. And as Josh mentioned at our Analyst Day in March, March 14, we laid out a path to the next step-up in gross margin, which is above 58%. So we had a model when we went public 2 years ago to get from 50% to 55%, where they're now the next step up is 58%. And there's three broad levers there, and I would say they're roughly equal. Mix is the first one, continue to release new products with better ASPs, but the same way for cost, same substrate costs. That's number one. So mix is very important. Number two is volume leverage. As we now are a $1 billion company, we were $550 million 3 years ago, we start to get volume leverage with our OSAT providers, our commodity providers. And the third one is continue to leverage our back-end facility in the Philippines. We do all of our tests there. We do half our assembly there, all of our probe there. So continue to leverage that facility and get volume leverage. But there's also operational improvements we continue to see in the Philippines. I was there last week. There's some very exciting test time reductions and lots of operational improvements we still have opportunities for.

Joshua Buchalter

analyst
#27

I guess bigger picture, you're a fabless company in an IDM world for the most part. And a lot of your analog, I see peers have structurally higher gross margins, either -- potentially because of that. How did you land on -- why is 58% the right margin level? Is that a milestone or the destination? But curious how you're thinking about the margin profile longer term competitively.

Derek D'Antilio

executive
#28

Sure. so I view 58% as the next sort of leg up with the next milestone. The first -- we were a mid-40s company when we had 2 fabs. We were at 43%, 44%, 45% gross margin company 5 years ago. When we went public, we were at 50%. The target was to get to 55% so the next step-up is 58%. So we have a track record of providing targets that we believe we have a path to achieving, right? So I don't think that's the end point, but that's the interim target is 58%. And we have a path in projects to get to that 58%. In terms of where it goes long term, I think it will be a bit split based upon the market. We have industrial products that are a little bit higher than the corporate average. Some of the automotive might be at the corporate average. And I think mix will drive a big piece of that is we think we have a higher value proposition, particularly in electric vehicles and particularly as TMR continues to get adopted.

Joshua Buchalter

analyst
#29

And the past couple of years, you've been capacity constrained, and you've done a lot of work to bring on supply at your foundry partners. Can you talk to where are you at today? Is capacity still constraining your upside to numbers? And then maybe talk about your, I guess, former owned fab, Polar, just received an equity investment. What's -- how does that help? And what's the long-term trajectory of capacity and you're building towards?

Derek D'Antilio

executive
#30

That's great. So we have three fab partners. One of them is Polar Semiconductor in Bloomington, Minnesota that we own 30% of. It was actually a wholly owned subsidiary of Sanken Electric, second partner is UMC that provides about 50% of our wafers. And then TSMC, we brought on about 3 years ago. So we have three fab partners. We continue to look at qualifying other fab partners in other parts of the world as the world sort of becomes geopolitically separated. But we're balancing all those pieces. So for the past 2.5 years, we've had a really tight wafer supply environment. Everything we do is on 200-millimeter wafers. Everything we do is on, we'll call it, legacy technology, 0.18 microns. So those -- they're not building more those fabs, except for in China, and the tools on coming for those fabs as well. So we've been really tight for the past 2 years. For the past 1.5 quarters, we've seen some relief from Polar in UMC. And what we've been able to do is build some strategic wafer bank. So here in Q4, we went from about 100 days in inventory to about 125 days. That was about $30 million in wafer bank. What's nice about having it in wafer bank is it's largely fungible downstream until it goes into probe and assembly and test. So it's pretty fungible across products when it's in wafer bank. But more importantly, it allows us to be much more responsive to our customers. It takes about 4 months off the lead time. So it's about 4 months from wafer stock to putting it in wafer bank and another 2 months maybe in the back end. And at one point a year ago, we had about 30% of our backlog that was past due. Meaning we were delinquent in shipping to our customers. That number is down to mid-teens. So we continue to work that down with our customers as a customer service matter. The next constraint really is the back end, getting probing equipment, getting assembly equipment, getting test equipment. The lead times on those equipment is still in excess of a year in many cases.

Joshua Buchalter

analyst
#31

And so it sounds like you want to keep building up the inventory levels. Is that the right conclusion to draw? Or are you comfortable here with lead times having improved materially? How should we think about, I guess, inventory levels into the back half of the year?

Derek D'Antilio

executive
#32

Yes. Lead times are still not where we want them to be. I think we have now more fungibility and the ability to selectively have shorter lead times, much more competitive lead times. But in general, they're not where we want them to be. So you could see us continue to build some strategic wafer bank. And as we get more probes online, strategic die bank. And that's the right place to sit. I think that will stop at some level, but you could see that happen over the next couple of quarters.

Joshua Buchalter

analyst
#33

And in the past couple of quarters, you've opened up cancellation windows. Has that changed much in the last quarter or two? As you -- how did that come in versus expectations? And can you talk about the fungibility of your supply, given everything's auto grade? If you get pockets of weakness in one end vertical, is it -- how is it oversimplifying it, but you can just port it to others? And I assume that that's part of the building up the wafer die bank. Can you talk about that dynamic?

Derek D'Antilio

executive
#34

Yes. So our entire supply chain is auto-grade certified, right? And so there's some questions about whether or not we need that for industrial, but it becomes very portable, especially at the wafer bank level. So within the sensing portfolio, the wafer is generally relatively fungible. So it's not fungible across sensors and power but within the different portfolios until it gets into packaging and assembly. Once it gets into packaging, it becomes pretty specific. So we want to keep it in wafer and die bank. So I think we're pretty comfortable building up some inventory to continue to bring down those delinquencies. In terms of the cancellations and looking at the backlog, we opened it up in the summer time last year to continue to work on this. Most of it is NC&R, but it's an ongoing process. It's not kind of a window. It's a daily, weekly process. I think every Friday morning, I have a call around which sort of orders do we want to put through the factory because we do have a back-end constraint right now, and we still have past due inventory. So we're making those kind of decisions constantly. And we did work with a lot of our -- particularly auto customers to say, if we're past due on an order, we'll allow you to cancel it. We'll allow you to reschedule it. We had more reschedules than we did cancels. We did have some cancels, but these are customers that have been customers for over 30 years. So we're not going to stuff inventory into their channel, and we expect orders when they need them.

Joshua Buchalter

analyst
#35

Shifting gears the last couple of minutes. In recent weeks, there's a press report -- a report out there that highlighted your relationship with Sanken Electric. Can you maybe walk through the history there? And I guess, address head on, any concerns that were raised in that report that you feel should be clarified.

Derek D'Antilio

executive
#36

Sure. I don't know if I'd call it a press report, but it was a bot written report. And the report suggested that there's lots of relationships between Allegro and Sanken and Polar. All true. We've disclosed all these things. So Sanken Electric has owned Allegro since 1990. When equity partners bought into Allegro in 2017. They took it public in 2020. Sanken Electric still owns 52% of Allegro. We had some commercial relationships. One of those was Sanken had been our exclusive distributor in Japan for 33 years. Really quite wonderful because it opened the Japanese market to an American company, which is difficult to do. Over the past 6 months, culminating in March 31, prior to this bot-written report, we actually exited that exclusive distribution relationship because they are two different businesses, and we want to have the direct relationships with the Toyotas and the Mitsubishis of Japan. That's early on the adoption curve of EV is starting to get on that path. In terms of Polar, they've been a wonderful supplier of wafers to us. They supply about 1/3 of our wafers. And over the past couple of years, they've become much more cost competitive with the Taiwanese manufacturer is, number one. And number two, it's really nice to have, today, a wafer supplier based in Minnesota when you're talking to U.S. auto suppliers. So it's become a really important partner. And I think the third part that they raised in that bot-written report that there's been some turnover in management in Allegro the last couple of years. Absolutely true. This former management team, the CEO had been here for 40 years, saw the company through its private equity, it's public offering, and then retired when he was in his 60s. And the same thing with the CFO, had been here for over a decade. So they brought myself in. They brought -- 1.5 years ago, they brought the new CEO, who joined a year ago, and both of us have combined about 50 years of public company experience. So both of us have a significant amount of public company experience at multibillion-dollar companies. And our task has been to make Allegro a much more independent public company. And how do you get this company to grow to the next level, a multibillion dollar company? Same focus, same market, same products, but the systems and processes required to be a multibillion dollar company public company.

Joshua Buchalter

analyst
#37

Careful with bot-written. AI is a good buzzword these days. Could you maybe spend another moment on specifically the Polar relationship and how that facility is operated between you and Sanken, because I think that would help clear some stuff up as well?

Derek D'Antilio

executive
#38

Sure. So Polar is a fab in Minnesota. It's a relatively small fab, 200-millimeter fab, 0.18 microns. And we share the output of that fab. So Sanken gets about 50% of the airport. We get about 50% of the output. Sanken makes them whole -- because they own 70% of it. Sanken makes them whole from a transfer pricing standpoint so that Polar can be profitable. I think in this one past quarter, they may have had a $406,000 loss. There's some transfer pricing rules that are allowed to do a small loss. We do not have to make them whole for transfer pricing. We only own 30% of it. We have a market-based pricing agreement and wafer supply agreement with Polar that is approved by our Audit Committee as a related party transaction and myself.

Joshua Buchalter

analyst
#39

Got it. You've got a good problem as a CFO, where you've got your cash balance continues to creep higher. Can you talk about your priorities there? I know the dividend, you've said not yet. Share repurchases are -- it's kind of tough given the ownership from Sanken. But you've done some deal like Heyday. How are you thinking about your uses of cash?

Derek D'Antilio

executive
#40

Yes. Great question. So we built up about $350 million of cash. We're generating some decent free cash flow. And the two primary uses of cash is to continue to invest in organic growth. We think we have a lot of opportunities. So research and development, we'll invest in it, about 15% of sales. We're a little below that right now, but in the right area, very focused on the areas that we have leadership in. The second area is we'll continue to invest in CapEx. So we're going to continue to build out our back-end facility in the Philippines, both from a building standpoint, equipment standpoint in anticipation of future growth and projected growth. The second area is selective M&A. I mean, Heyday, it was a very small M&A, but I think it fits the bill of the type of M&A that we would look at, which is it accelerates what we're already doing on our road map. We can sell it to our customers. We have expertise in it. And those things are important because they allow you to capture revenue or cost synergies quickly and allow you to run that type of business. What you won't see us do is something that's a third leg of the stool or something for diversification, I've done enough for those to know that it's really difficult to do those. So if there's something that accelerates our road map on e-mobility, select industrial markets in sensing technology, next-generation sensing technology or power that we have expertise in, that would absolutely be something we'd be interested in.

Joshua Buchalter

analyst
#41

All right. Well, the big red clock says we're about out of time. Any last thoughts you'd like to leave the audience with?

Vineet Nargolwala

executive
#42

I think what's misunderstood a little bit about Allegro is we're a relatively new public company being public for 2.5 years. But the fact that we've been around for 100 years and serving auto for over 35 years, I think, is really important because having those relationships and having 10-plus years of reliability data is actually a pretty big moat in automotive and even some of our formidable competitors who work in consumer have been public longer than us have a hard time breaking into that. So that's something that I think may not be apparent by looking at a 2.5-year-old public company.

Joshua Buchalter

analyst
#43

All right. Well, we're out of time. Derek, thank you.

Derek D'Antilio

executive
#44

Thank you very much. Appreciate it.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.