Altair Engineering Inc. (ALTR) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

May 14, 2020

NASDAQ US conference_presentation 35 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Jackson Ader

analyst
#1

Thank you very much, Chris. Good morning, everyone. Welcome to this Thursday morning of our 48th Annual Technology, Media and Communications Conference. My name is Jackson Ader, I'm part of the software technology team here at JPMorgan. Very pleased to have with us the team from Altair. CEO and Founder, Jim Scapa; CFO, Howard Morof, here with us from the Altair team. Just very quickly on the format. We'll give Jim and Howard a minute to introduce the company, introduce themselves, and then I'll go and do some Q&A. And for those on the webinar or the webcast, you'll notice there's a little Q&A button on the perimeter of your screen. If you have any questions throughout our presentation here, please toss them into the Q&A queue. And Jim and Howard and myself will do our best to get them answered. So without any further ado, Jim and Howard, if you want to take a minute just to introduce Altair, that would be great.

James Scapa

executive
#2

Okay. Thank you, Jackson. And how come you have a nicer background than we do?

Jackson Ader

analyst
#3

Changed it this morning because of my navy blue attire.

James Scapa

executive
#4

You didn't want to blend into the background. Okay. So my name is Jim Scapa. I'm the Founder and CEO of Altair. Founded the company back in 1985, so it's 35 years ago and have been running the company since. We were a private company for 32 years and IPO-ed about 3 years ago, at the end of 2017. Altair's historically focused on simulation in the manufacturing vertical. And then through the years, we -- about 15 years ago, we shifted and made an acquisition, actually a spin-off from NASA Ames in the high-performance computing space. We saw the transition to where HPC was going and decided it was an important space for us to be invested in. And that brought us into weather and in some other markets as well, like telecom and others, and defense, and life science actually as well. And then more recently, we're focused on data analytics. We made an acquisition about 1.5 years ago, a company called Datawatch, and that brought us very, very strong solution for that space as well.

Jackson Ader

analyst
#5

That's great. Howard, if you want to step in and just maybe talk about the scale of the company, introduce yourself as well, that would be great.

Howard Morof

executive
#6

Sure. I joined Jim actually as a Board member back in 2011 and 2012, and happily moved into the CFO role back in very early 2013. Yes, as far as scale of the company, we're part of a global enterprise. We're about 1/3, 1/3, 1/3, equally between the Americas, EMEA and APAC. Revenue in terms of -- you can think of us as about a $450 million a year enterprise, primarily software. Over the course of time, software has become really the predominant part of what we do. There's a small part of our businesses, which is service, but operate today in 26 countries and with quite an amazing footprint across the globe and, frankly, a really impressive customer base literally around the globe.

Jackson Ader

analyst
#7

Can we actually just talk about those -- that customer base, Jim? Who are the main customers that you serve, either by vertical, by industry? And is there any difference between those customers from a simulation standpoint versus analytics?

James Scapa

executive
#8

Sure. So Altair's based in Detroit, one of the few software companies that's coming out of the Detroit market actually. And Detroit is obviously the automotive home for most companies in the U.S. historically. So our strength to begin with was automotive and automotive U.S. And then through the years, we've extended that out to automotive globally. And then we've gone out to other verticals. About 20 years ago, we really started making a push into aerospace and a lot of other vertical markets. So today, automotive still remains the #1 vertical for us. Automotive plus aerospace is probably around 50% of our business. That's by revenue. By number of customers, it's probably more like 1/3 at that point. But in addition to that, we are in about 11,000 customers actually globally across the board for Altair. So it's a very, very broad number of customers. Data analytics, with the acquisition of Datawatch, they brought actually about 14,000 customers, believe it or not, but we only churn around 3,000 that are -- what we're sort of looking at as enterprise ongoing paying customers. And those customers actually span. So many of the automotive companies and aerospace are actually customers on the books there, believe it or not. But the lion's share of their business is in the financial services market, a lot of health care as well in insurance. Actually, a lot of retail as well. So when you look at the breadth of the vertical markets that Altair plays in, it's quite an amazing breadth of companies. And there's a lot of crossover, actually. Yes.

Jackson Ader

analyst
#9

So -- and we may be jumping a little bit ahead, but what would be a common use case or crossover? Why -- if I'm simulating a crash and impact simulation engineer for Ford or GM, why would I also maybe need to use some sort of Datawatch product?

James Scapa

executive
#10

Okay. So there's 2 crossovers. So there's the first crossover into an automotive customer, since you picked that, is into the office of finance or marketing, and that's where they already have some Datawatch products. And there's a lot of opportunity for broadening that base pretty significantly actually. But on the engineering side, if you talk about simulation for crash or for any type of simulation, today, the way that we do this, you might have a design in CAD, you import it into your simulation tools and you'll run a simulation. But you can see that the future is going to apply a lot more machine learning algorithms to doing this kind of work. So you'll run 1,000 or whatever number of simulations you'll run and then you'll use machine learning algorithms to process that. And now when you have a new design, you're going to actually use the machine learning technology to give you what it's predicting as the answer. So believe it or not, you're doing predictions using machine learning that are not going to be as accurate. Although from a lot of the testing that we're doing, many are very, very accurate actually. But you'll be able to do very quick understanding of, if I make this change or this change, what's the impact to crash going to be? What's the impact to noise and vibration going to be? And so there's a huge crossover here that's somewhere along the way, I think intellectually, most of the analysts and investors understand. But for whatever reason, you're not making that leap. So there's -- the future of engineering is going to be a combination of machine learning technology and data science and simulation. And now when you get to the back end of the world where you have products that are all connected, obviously, more and more in the future, you're going to be collecting a lot of data on how these things are operating. And here again, you can run simulations. And we have 0D, 1D, very quick running types of simulations that might predict what's happening in service. But with machine learning technology, you much more rapidly can make evaluations about failures, service requirements, those sorts of things, how to improve the operation of that device. And so it's a combination of data science and simulation and all this algorithmic stuff that, frankly, speed is going to drive decision-making. Whether it's for how to invest your money in the stock market or how to design a better car for crashing performance. And we view our business as not a simulation company, but a company using algorithms and mathematics, if you will, and high-performance computing. And all of that to actually help customers make decisions across the board. So that's how we're defining our business.

Jackson Ader

analyst
#11

Okay. That's great. That's a great overview. If we could touch more on the simulation side. You mentioned a number of things. So product development, time to market, accuracy, reduction of costs. These are all part of an underlying tailwind where simulation software is kind of eating into the share of maybe of physical prototyping. Can you just talk about what you see in terms of the growth rate and market of simulation? Do you expect that to possibly pick up or accelerate in the coming years as the software becomes maybe more accurate and also can run faster?

James Scapa

executive
#12

So -- right. So the history of simulation, which goes back 30 to 40 years now -- we'll say, 30 years, 35 years, I guess, is really to replace tests. So it's all validation. So when I began -- when I graduated college at 21 and I went out and I worked at Ford Motor Company as my first job and I got involved there, we would design things and then we'd take it to the lab and break it basically. And then go, "Oh, it breaks like this. Let's redesign it." And so that was the process. And it's very time consuming. It's very, very expensive. Think of crash simulation, you have to build an entire vehicle, then you crash it, and it's good for one task basically. And so with simulation, we've been basically eating away at test for the last 30 years, and that continues actually. Because there is still a lot of testing going on, and there's still going to be places where you have to ultimately test. But there are also places where you can't test at all. And so simulation becomes of even more paramount importance. Through the last 10 or 15 years though, we've been pushing this idea of simulation-driven design, where you take simulation, you put it in front of CAD, if you will, and as you actually are synthesizing designs using simulation, that's something that we've been working very hard on and is really beginning to take hold. So the history there is that CAD -- the CAD companies do the design and then they try to add a little bit of basic simulation inside their CAD tool. But what we're really talking about is something sort of beyond that, where the simulation is really helping -- using, of course, the human creativity and all that. But is really helping you to synthesize the most high-performing, manufacturable, all of that design. And that's the vision that we have, and that's what we're working towards. Not sure I'm wholly answering -- totally answering your question, but I'm giving you something there.

Jackson Ader

analyst
#13

Yes. No, that is helpful. And we definitely will come back to a deeper dive on simulation-driven -- design with Inspire and SIMSOLID. Just quickly though, I mean the topic on everybody's mind is COVID-19, what impacts Altair is seeing either to your own business and your customers. Howard, if I could just ask you the first question. What were some of the internal or maybe the operational changes that Altair really needed to make right off the bat? And what areas within the company maybe are particularly challenged or could see some benefits from this work from home environment?

Howard Morof

executive
#14

So we were actually relatively easy in terms of shifting to essentially almost 100% virtual work environment around the globe. Our systems were quite robust. As already agreed, very well-developed global enterprise that collaborates to a huge degree on a global basis. Flipping to essentially work from home was really not that much of a challenge. It's certainly a change, but not really that much of a challenge. Certainly, we had a little bit of capacity here or there or whatever, but nothing that was at all a hindrance whatsoever. And in fact, we've seen some pretty interesting, I'll say, improvements which is shifts in productivity where people have actually the ability to do more even working from home because there's little less interruption and what have you. So the pivot for us, actually, quite easy. What we've been able to do is convert a lot of our sales and marketing activities from in-person to virtual. And in fact, those have been beyond well received. The breadth of our reach with some of these activities is really quite astonishingly positive. We talked -- Jim mentioned a little bit about SIMSOLID and things like that. I mean there's just -- there's tremendous interest and actually opportunity, greater opportunity, for some of our customers [ and focus their ] customers to engage with us in that regard. So obviously helps from a budgetary perspective. We're not spending money on travel. We're certainly not spending some money on the outside trade show types of activities. So there's a little bit of an economic benefit, cast that aside for the moment. The pivot here has been really pretty seamless, frankly.

Jackson Ader

analyst
#15

Okay. And could you just touch on how the HyperWorks units model really plays a role in the flexibility and the resiliency in terms of your customers' ability to test the software?

James Scapa

executive
#16

There's 2 aspects there. We, quite a few years ago, created this con -- So when a customer today gets a license file, they load it on servers on their own premises, basically. We created this concept of what we call hosted units where we do all the control of licensing from servers in the cloud. And we rolled that out about 8 years ago. We use that for our own internal use. We use it for all of our EDU stock. We use it for our reseller channel for the last several years. And some customers use that, but frankly, speaking, historically, our direct sales force has been reluctant to promote that. Although within the corporation, we prefer that because it actually reduces cost for us and it's much easier to manipulate and all of the tracking that we do is much easier to do now. With COVID, it's actually accelerated the take-up of the hosted units. We promoted them now and suddenly, our own sales force is embracing it, customers are embracing it, and that's been really positive. Beyond that, the whole concept of the units model, just in general, is a very flexible approach to licensing and really continues to give us the opportunity, particularly, at this moment, where customers are concerned about cost, they're coming to us more and more. In some cases, believe it or not, giving us a list of other applications and saying, which ones can you replace? I'm not kidding. And that, by the way, includes some data analytics. So that model is particularly, in a moment like this, I think, is really strong. And the hosted units was kind of a lifesaver for many customers who didn't -- Altair actually was very prepared coming in. We added about 2,500 VPN servers. So we were super prepared for this large-scale move to remote work. But with a lot of customers, they weren't. And with the other software, you're going to hit your VPN servers in a really big way. And many really just didn't have the bandwidth to handle that, so they needed temporary licenses. We also did a lot of temporary licenses for customers who weren't willing, for whatever reason, are able to go to hosted. So hope that answers your question.

Jackson Ader

analyst
#17

Why was the direct sales force a little hesitant go to the hosted model? Are the commissions different?

James Scapa

executive
#18

No, not different commissions because I'll say that our sales force is very customer-oriented and they were concerned that the customers would be worried, which they are sometimes about security, this sort of stuff, if I'm going to the cloud for this thing. Actually, from a security standpoint, everything -- all your data, everything, still resides on-prem. It's just the licensing that's not, and it's actually very, very secure. For us, it's extremely well tested to over the last 8 years. So it was very easy for us to roll this out at this time in a pretty large-scale way. For another company to do that is, frankly speaking, much harder to do it rapidly, unless they are going to test it well.

Jackson Ader

analyst
#19

Right. Okay. So it's not like you were doing it on the fly. You had this model already set up. Okay. That's helpful. So you serve obviously industries that have been hit hard by COVID: Automotive, aerospace, energy, maybe chemicals, retail. So what are customers saying? And actually, I want to layer one thing in here. One thing that you've always said, Jim, is that Altair really plays, in terms of simulation, in the high end of simulation. So I'm just curious, first of all, can you -- for those of us that may not be as well versed with what it means to be in the high end of simulation to begin with, can you give us a little bit of a definition there? And then also, would you expect the high end to be particularly hurt during this time frame? Or do you -- would you expect it to be maybe more resilient during COVID-19?

James Scapa

executive
#20

Okay. So high end to me is products that are more complex probably and require more complex types of simulation, system-level simulations as opposed to a little part that goes on a system, that goes on a car, if you will. So more to the buy end is that. High end to me is, as I usually describe it, is auto, aero, ship design, rail, heavy machinery. I mean, at our customers, every one of the big names in Silicon Valley that you wouldn't think would be customers of Altair are all customers of Altair and in Washington state. So all of the high-tech companies are our customers as well. They're all making pretty complex products these days. And then they use us for a variety of other technology, HPC technology and others as well. Electronic chip design, all of that uses our technology. So as far as how hurt they are, yes, their businesses are very significantly impacted. There's no doubt about that. But engineering -- the engineering spend in these companies is a relatively small percentage of the total. And so -- and even more important today than it's ever been because it's such a competitive market right now, you have to really have products that are at the leading edge, and everyone is investing in that direction. So somewhat surprisingly almost to me, one of the leading indicators is the staffing or the CES part of our business, which is smaller and smaller percentage-wise, but it's still a substantive business, a rent close to $50 million. That business is usually like hit very hard first because they'll cut people that are contract people. We've really not seen -- like in '08, '09, that was decimated. But now, in this market, the customers are clearly recognizing that getting that talent is so challenging, they don't want to lose it. Only one of our customers, and I think they made a really large error, has cut a lot of their engineering contracting staff, and we've been placing some of those people at some other companies already. And they actually have called some of them back now because I think they're beginning to realize maybe not such a good move, plus some time has passed. So some have done some pay cuts, both to their salary people and some contractors. That's why you'll see our projections to be down a little bit. But we balance that 100% on the cost side as well. And just in general, I'm seeing pretty much strength in that part of the business. All the renewals are coming in, as you would expect. There is opportunity, as I mentioned, for some displacement of other things with the strength of our model and the breadth of what we do. But it probably won't drive a lot of expansion in new business in this year. This is a very unusual year. But it's not that we're sitting here going, "Oh, we're going to lose a huge amount of revenue there." It's more on the sort of this year things will be much more stable, but not growing as it has been.

Jackson Ader

analyst
#21

Yes. Howard, just quickly to follow up on that. Maybe average deal size or average sales cycle, have you seen anything from the pipeline metrics that have changed materially from what you would have expected?

Howard Morof

executive
#22

So the only thing we've really seen is a little bit of an elongation in the sales cycle. If you think about where we are and the nature of maybe some of the comments over the last few minutes, the last weeks, maybe a little over a month, whatever the case may be, what we've really seen is our customer base pivot from working essentially in-premise to working virtual. So the focus there has been just enable me to continue to do the things that we need to do and want to do to continue to move forward with product design, development activities and such. So from there, we've not really seen a change in the sales metrics and things like that of any real significance other than more about help me shift and manage in a virtual environment, and then we'll continue to, I'll say, engage on the sales side. To me, the 2 things that are most notable, and Jim mentioned this -- the impact on the CES business, that shows that our customers have spent a decade building deeply technical teams and capabilities and such. And they're really trying to hold on to those resources, not shun them quickly apart from it because they recognize how important that is moving forward. So that's a real nice positive from a sales cycle perspective because they're keeping their channel pool. The second is all the huge amount of time and attention to webinars and training and things like that shows, again, real serious interest in using tools and technologies, ours in particular, to drive forward even in this type of environment. So it's a nice way of saying, no, really not seeing anything other than Q -- end of Q1, Q2-ish seems a pause on the expansion opportunities while everybody has pivoted and is pivoting into the virtualized environment.

Jackson Ader

analyst
#23

Okay. Understood. So Jim, I just want to revisit something you brought up earlier, that's simulation-driven design. Taking simulation, moving it up in the product design, even maybe -- even, as you mentioned, ahead of CAD or embedding it into computer-aided design. What solutions is Altair rolling out really in the next few months that are going to hit the market in this area?

James Scapa

executive
#24

Right. What Altair really did probably 10 years ago or so as we -- things sort of grew up in this market. People used to design on drafting boards and they did testing in the lab. And then you move from drafting boards to 2D CAD systems and then ultimately to 3D and the 3D with services and simulation sort of grew up alongside of 3D CAD. What we -- and it just sort of came along and the way things are done, that process, and it's a little bit of throwing things over the wall process, just sort of evolved. We said -- we sat down 10, 12 years ago, and we said, if we had a blank sheet of paper, we were going to develop an approach to designing things from a concept stage completely new, knowing what we know now, how would we do it? And what we created, and it's a long process, but the product today, if you come online and look at some videos and see where we're going, you're going to see something that's beginning to really flower. And this is not that we're putting simulation on to CAD. We're actually creating a solution that is a simulation solution that has geometry and CAD-like functionality within it. So it's a little bit different, we're flipping it around a little bit. And that's really what the Inspire product is. Within Inspire and in that same framework, you have all the ability to develop your controls, same user experience. And then motion simulations, you automatically transfer loads from the motion to the structure. Then you do generative design and full simulation, multidisciplinary simulations. And ultimately, you end up with a design that you can either take to CAD and detail it further, if you want, but ultimately, maybe even stay longer in that solution. So that's the vision that we have for simulation-driven design. And by the way, AI and machine learning begins to enter into that. We've recently developed a new technology that we think is going to play pretty interestingly there. It's under the covers, but that's all machine learning technology. That also is going to drive these designs, these shapes, to do best-in-class. So one of the technologies that I know you guys are very interested in, so I'll mention it here before you ask me, is SIMSOLID. We went out and we acquired SIMSOLID. And it was a risky acquisition in a way. There was almost no revenue there. There was huge buzz in the market, though. There were a lot of really major corporations that were evaluating it. It was a little bit on the buggy side still, it's a very tiny company, and we evaluated it. And my guys came to me and they're like, this stuff is amazing. I mean it's -- and I didn't trust them, and we went through this whole long 6-month process, all the way up to -- one of my Board members is the dean at Columbia Engineering school and one professor at Columbia actually dove deep into the math. And they came back and they said, this is a really rare technology here that is really game changing. And I completely overpaid for it. They didn't want to sell the company, by the way. So I bought it. They're all excited nowadays, and SIMSOLID is taking the market by storm. But the solution itself is in an environment which doesn't have, if you will, the geometry capabilities. So now we've -- and many of the customers are like, yes, but we need to be able to change it and then rerun it and make evaluations or whatever. So now we brought it into Inspire. We have other simulation technologies there, too. But bringing SIMSOLID into Inspire gives us like this next-generation super-fast technology to do that as well. And so that's just launching now. And so the simulation-driven design portfolio -- and by the way, inside of there, we have every manufacturing simulation. I had a lot of customers early days of Inspire tell me, it's all great, we can do the generative design in there. But if we can't manufacture it, it's not useful to us. I mean I had VPs of major suppliers, I'm thinking I won't say the name of the companies, and we began aggressively adding manufacturing simulation, the same beautiful lightweight designer-level user experience around very high-end manufacturing and the integration of all that into optimization to synthesize designs. So you can decide is it cast, is it extruded, is it formed, is it additive. We just launched additive. All of that is available in the same framework. That is simulation-driven design. It's across the board.

Jackson Ader

analyst
#25

Great. We did get a question from the audience, and I love its simplicity. And maybe if you could answer this, not just in relation to maybe what your competitors are doing in simulation-driven design, but can you talk about your competition with ANSYS? I think many investors are focused on the Altair ANSYS dynamic in the marketplace.

James Scapa

executive
#26

I didn't see that question. How come it didn't come up on mine? But okay. I'm not sure what you want me to say. So ANSYS is a terrific company. It's extremely well-run. It is very investor-focused. I would say, we're a lot more customer-focused, for good or bad. I think they have a great portfolio of products and a very strong customer base. They have historically played in the middle part of the market, but they are pushing to the upper end of the market, mainly through some M&A. And they're a great competitor. I think that Altair is fundamentally a much more technology- and product-driven company. The breadth of our offerings and the depth and the innovation in our offerings, I think, is substantially higher. We play in some different spaces. They got into the EDA space with integrated circuit design. So now they compete with Cadence, for example, on that side of things, and that's not a space we play in. And we play in some spaces that they don't play in. And so there's -- it's not an exact overlap in terms of what the companies do. But both of us play in a market which is, honestly, going to continue to grow because we're both in a space where math and algorithms are driving decisions for our customers. And so I think we're both in a great market.

Jackson Ader

analyst
#27

Okay. We're getting the wrap-up signal from our producers. So Jim, Howard, thank you so much for joining us this morning. Really appreciate you being with us in the conference, and glad all is well. We'll talk to you soon.

James Scapa

executive
#28

Thank you.

Howard Morof

executive
#29

Jackson, thank you very much. Bye now. take care.

Jackson Ader

analyst
#30

Yes. See you.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Altair Engineering Inc. transcript — plus 258,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Altair Engineering Inc. earnings transcripts and 258,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.

More tools for stock research

OptionsBell: an unusual options activity scanner that tracks options flow across all US stocks and emails you when large trades appear in Altair Engineering Inc. or any ticker on your watchlist.

StockMarketScan: a stock screener with alerts: 24 pre-built screens refreshed every 5 minutes, watchlists and email notifications. Both offer API and MCP access and fair monthly pricing.