Asana, Inc. (ASAN) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
October 11, 2022
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Catherine Buan
executiveWelcome to everyone joining us here at the Oracle Park. I'll start with the obligatory safe harbor statements. Today's session may include forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that may cause our actual results to be materially different from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements. Please refer to our full forward-looking statements available on the table. And for those of you listening on the audio, it is on your screen as well. So I'm going to invite Neil Boland to join us on stage right now. We couldn't be more excited to welcome Neil Boland, the Senior VP of Technology and CISO of Major League Baseball. Here, in conversation with our very own, Anne Raimondi, our COO and Head of Business. So I think most of you here know that baseball is one of the oldest professional sports in America with roots dating back as far as 1876. But when it comes to technology, Major League Baseball is anything but a history lesson. In fact, when it comes to trend setting technological advancements, no sport does it better than MLB. One of the goals is to ensure that the sports sustains from generation to generation and technology advancements play a critical role in the long-term health of the game. And with 162 games in the regular season, it's also the longest season across all of American sports. They have thousands of people working at MLB, and they host over 70 million fans per year. So the business of baseball is an enormous undertaking, and the bar for quality at scale is very high, which makes us even more fortunate to have Neil here, because he leads the teams that provide the backbone enabling these technological innovations and initiatives. So with that, let me introduce Anne, who will take it from here.
Anne Raimondi
executiveThanks so much, Catherine. And thank you all so much for joining us today. It's so great to see so many familiar faces and meet some new ones. We're so excited to be here at the stadium, thanks to Neil and MLB. It's actually near and dear to me because I'm a [indiscernible] native and lifelong fan. So I did kind of nerd out getting to see the players' entrance onto the field. So I'm going to have a great story to tell my kids tonight. But Neil, thanks so much for being here with us. So as SVP of Technology and CISO for Major League Baseball, you're essentially in charge of all of the information stack for MLB and work directly with Commissioner, Rob Manfred, and CEO, Chris Marinac. You are also on the Advisory Board of some pretty innovative, impactful technology companies like Okta, Palo Alto Networks, Carbon Black, Payray and DidIt. And you've been driving a lot of innovation at MLB over the last few years, not only to streamline operations, but what we thought was really interesting is you're also using technology to improve player performance and elevate the experience for fans. So can you share more with us today about your vision and strategy for technology across MLB?
Neil Boland
attendeeYes. I mean it's the same strategy, whether it's fans or players or back-office employees, the goal is to reduce friction for everybody. And technology is obviously one of the best tools and platforms to do that. So we're constantly either on the lookout for a technology platform that will help us to that end and where we can achieve that we're building. And so we've built a lot of solutions over time in-house, but that takes us away from the business of baseball. So I mean, I think one that investors might be familiar with is the advanced media organization and building out our streaming platform, which we're, I think, one of the first sports organizations to market with a leading streaming capability for our fans and that ultimately got sold to Disney as what is now Disney Plus. And so as we've evolved from that, we're like, hey, those are great technological achievements, but they kind of can take us away from the business of baseball. So obviously, technology has come a long way over that time. So we pay careful attention to the space and the landscape to understand what partners will help us reduce that friction primarily, and help us deliver a better experience to our fans, but just as much a more productive experience to our players and our employees.
Anne Raimondi
executiveYes. So maybe following up on that. You said traditionally, you've looked at both building yourself and buying as you make buying decisions, what's important to you, and you've also shared with us like scale is really important, but I would love to hear more about that.
Neil Boland
attendeeYes. So when you look at us, it's really interesting at baseball you see is the big brand of MLB, the big brand of the clubs, but there are not a lot of people oftentimes behind those brands. There's a great group of people, but you look at a mid-market club and there's a few hundred people in that front office, and they have a lot to do to be able to scale out to their fan base, right? And so they need that type of force multiplier. So we're looking for a partner. We're looking at not only somebody that can help us scale along those lines, but like help us look at all the areas that we engage, like all of our engagement points and how do we quickly scale those up to the different aspects of how we go to market. And so we are very careful in selecting partners that not only can get us there quickly, but will back us up along the way. Because the weight is on so few shoulders, right? And we're not seeing scale, I think of like a partnership of a company that I look at that staff, they might as well have mlb.com e-mail addresses because they're going to be right there in the trenches with us and help us accomplish that. So scale is much bigger for us than, hey, like can it handle this much traffic or can it handle this load. It's more, can it handle the way that we need to do business and in the way that we're able to do it and will they be there with us.
Anne Raimondi
executiveYes. No, I appreciate that. I was also super interesting to hear you talk about how within MLB, you're an enterprise organization, you've got mid-market companies in terms of the teams and even start-ups with minor league. So I learned how you talked about technology and needs of scale to address all those different needs pretty seamlessly. So as you and the clubs technology leadership decide on what to put on the road map, what's the next innovative technologies you want to adopt, how do you think about that mandate and how do you all prioritize across the different choices you could be investing in?
Neil Boland
attendeeYes, there's a lot of -- I think we see SaaS sprawl. There's a lot of SaaS partners out there. And for us, everybody is kind of overlapping and kind of saying that they're going to be effective and relevant in the space. So we've devoted a lot more energy to partner management and to partner R&D. And that's been really fun for our teams. We look at who's out there. We always approach it as somebody is ought to be doing this. Somebody's got to have tackled this. And our story when it comes to this particular space has been a bit of a grueling one. We've been kind of like waiting for this gap to be filled in the space. Now as an employee coming into baseball, I already have a solution. I will admit to everybody here, I am a long-time Asana user and it's a funny story going back to managing my kids at home and tours and tasks and such as a free user. But coming in, I have that idea that like, hey, I'm going to continue to use this platform, this product because it makes me effective. And as I talk to people in the space, in our space, and around the space about like, hey, what are you doing? I found more and more people kind of on their own, because the business hasn't really sorted a direction here in this particular area. And we found people on credit cards or kind of like individual business units doing their own thing. And lucky for me, like they -- many have come to the same conclusion that I had around the product that they had selected. So it made things a bit easier. But for us, it's much more about finding the right partners in the space that have the right attributes and the right capabilities to go forward together and really be effective at the end of the day.
Anne Raimondi
executiveNo, I appreciate that, especially how your personal story, a few of us were talking about kids. So those of you who are trying to manage children. Asana is a great platform for it, but it can also scale to your enterprise. So I love hearing. Neil also has some pro tips on how to block your children from assigning you tasks, but making sure you can assign them tasks. So love that. So maybe looking -- diving deeper on as MLB has been adopting Asana, you are using it across so many workflows across the organization, operations, marketing, distribution, legal, finance, compliance. Can you share a little bit more about some of these workflows that really rely on collaboration across teams? I think there's often a lot of interest in like what are these like complex cross-functional workflows that our best customers are using Asana on. So I would love to hear that.
Neil Boland
attendeeYes, I think that goes back a bit to your comment -- your question around scale, right? So here, we have this like great platform. I love it. My direct teams love it. And -- but how do we scale that out across these more complex workflows that we have in the business of baseball, and they are pretty complex. We can talk for hours about behind the scenes. But from that perspective, we needed a platform that was going to be intuitive and easy for people to like apply to those complex [ four ] processes. And that was -- just going back to your question about scale, that comes back to mind as I think about enabling those complex processes. We are so dependent on our supply chain right now. And it's just going to increase that dependency. For those that follow baseball, you see us with our World Baseball Classic right now, and we're -- there are 28 countries in competition. And we don't have the staff to put around the world. And so we rely on folks in those markets and that might be the baseball federation in that market; it might be the promoter in that market; it might be the facility of the stadium in that market that we have to convert to be a ballpark. So you see all that kind of in play. And it's a lot has to come together for that. If anybody seem kind of like us to like the Field of Dreams event in Iowa where on opening day when we did in Australia way to convert the Cricket grounds to be a ballpark. All that requires so many teams, so many logistics and then forget about like the back end of baseball operations or getting players there, it will be so classic because of logistics nightmare as teams fall out of competition and do advance, don't advance and all this is happening real time with so many people involved. So platforms like this are crucial to us, especially when you look at where you've come from, like this was being done on like sheets and task lists and e-mail and other collaboration tools that just weren't as effective. And so this is kind of like game changing for us to have the proper tooling to do it, do it right and do it better.
Anne Raimondi
executiveAnd I think a couple of things that are so interesting to us, one is just MLB is a global organization and that you're coordinating all these different sort of complex events around the world. And I think one of the things you shared that we just really want hearing is that once you've built it and built these templates, you can use it again. So all the workflows that you've created, all the automation can be replicated the next year for next event. And so that level of, again, being able to innovate and move faster, we love seeing.
Neil Boland
attendeeYes, we're excited about that for. And I think it's 1 of the reasons that I got traction in standardizing on a platform. And it's the reusability aspect of it, because there are a lot of similarity even on the complex task front in terms of holding like international events. And there's other people in that too international events that aren't the world baseball classics that are going to benefit from those playbooks, right? And everybody likes to be self-sufficient, right? So you want to be smart and you don't want to call people up and be that person. And if you can pull up like those templates in that history, you're off to the races and you're doing good out the gate. So we really like that part. The most difficult aspect of that, though, was convincing people that like we have a platform in place that everybody can collaborate on. That would meet all of their needs and it's hard sometimes for people to let go. And this is an area that was super interesting. It took me a couple of years to get to that place just because of some pre-existing notions and even like factions of folks but we got there. And it's like we're in a really good spot.
Anne Raimondi
executiveYes. Were there some keys in your mind to like unlock that and sort of get some of the fractions off of maybe how they were working on to a shared platform.
Neil Boland
attendeeYes. I mean, I guess I have to credit some folks on your team for that, because I certainly didn't have the bandwidth to showcase the art of the possible on the platform. But you guys definitely have some passionate folks on the team that are there for you even after like the sale and you're moving forward. And I think they're -- they learned our business and I could leave them alone with downstream internal business customers or even the clubs to represent around the platform. So it was really that level of engagement and education that was necessary, also like not to disservice the product. I mean, the product is very flexible. And it can shape to the way that we do business. And I feel like I had to assess every one of these products just to show that, like we considered everybody's opinion. And I think that was another part of it. It was demonstrating that you went through the process with everybody's needs in mind, but even where they came from in mind. And by doing that and showing them there is a safe place to go. And here's the benefit of all of us actually all being on the same platform, a lot of people will let go and realize the value of the platform.
Anne Raimondi
executiveGreat. Now I really appreciate hearing that. You're also adopting a lot of other technology just given the complexity of MLB. Can you share a little bit more often, we get the question that like, okay, well, how important are integration? How important is making sure it connects to the rest of your tech stack? So we'd love to hear.
Neil Boland
attendeeI think we have like a pretty forward-thinking tech stack, I would say. And we certainly are looking to use the best technologies in each of the areas. And I think you all know how it is these days. There's a lot of products that, again, overlap or say they can do all these things, and they tout the simplicity of that. And we've had to find that middle ground like what's the best products that we can use in this area. And does it have the integrations with the other products that we've invested in. So know that we use all of the big brands but there is this missing ingredient in this area and that's what we had to solve for. And I've been shocked over the years that nobody has really done well other than the relationship that we have. And so I feel like, hey, I was the forward thinker on the team like, yah. But the integrations to your question, are pretty critical, and they can't just be like cosmetic integrations or tangential integrations, they have to be meaningful integrations that allow people who are like living in Slack or living in O365 to like to make this happen. And to make sure that like these types of activities are in the right place and that they feel confident along the platform, no, it's going to -- that's going into Asana, easy to get it in there, easy to like keep it up to date, and people are really happy about that.
Anne Raimondi
executiveI'd like hearing that people are happy. I know one thing you've shared with us that you're really excited about is something you call work kits. Can you share more about that and how you're using that?
Neil Boland
attendeeSo -- I'm trying to think -- I'm sorry, I was thinking about something else. What was the question?
Anne Raimondi
executiveAbout -- you were talking about kind of how you've -- how you've created what you call sort of work kits, thing that then are much more extendable and can be rolled out and how you use Asana to do that?
Neil Boland
attendeeGot it. So just we have this, we call it work kits because we have a lot of interns and other folks that we're bringing into the business to learn baseball, which is a different initiation. On the work kits side, yes, so we want people to hit the ground running. And we want to make sure that like they are properly instrumented with the right tools to get their job done. And there's like a certain amount of, I think, definition with how roles are structured and what people need to do in those roles. And as we're -- we have like a very seasonal kind of like hiring cycle. So you might see like a club that has like 400 people in the regular -- in the off-season, in the front office, the core people scale to like 2,500 people, and you have all these folks that need to come up to speed. And so that's kind of like what we're thinking about here is like as they come in the door and they're smart people, like how do we enable them. They're not always the same people. And like -- and so how do we keep that consistency in what we deliver for the sport despite like a changing resource audience and such. So I mean, to summarize, that's kind of how I look at that.
Anne Raimondi
executiveYes. No, just that description of you need to be a little bit like onboard and train pretty quickly seasonal groups of employees sort of across the country or across the world and being able to do that in a scaled manner?
Neil Boland
attendeeAnd the bar is high because these folks need to deal with like little kids and exception circumstances and all sorts of things like when you have a mass gathering event of tens of thousands of people in a facility that's important. And that's where you're seeing that uptick in the seasonal stand.
Anne Raimondi
executiveYes. No, that's on. And then at the same time, you're also using Asana to roll out some pretty complex technology initiatives. You showed us the instant replay room when we visited in New York. Can you share more about how you think about those initiatives that are transformative to the MLB experience and how you're using Asana for those?
Neil Boland
attendeeAbsolutely. So super excited as we continue to evolve our technology footprint. And as I mentioned, we're partnering a lot. But there are some things that we do ourselves and internally, they're complex, and we're very focused. So instant replay, looks good on the screen, but there's a lot that goes on behind the scenes to make that effective. It's a real-time deliverable. You can't have an issue with that. You've got to be mapped out on all the different paths you might head in. There's a lot of those during the regular season going on at the same time. So building that out and making that effective and making sure that we have alternative paths and such, that whole development project was huge. We're working on things in the ballpark. Coming in here, like how do we do things like frictionless entry and have people just like better than the clear line at the airport like how do folks just come straight in and what has to come together to pull that off. And not only is it technology, but there's like regulatory stuff that you have to pay attention to. There's all these exceptions, there's how do you handle minors. There's all those things that we're looking at. But the end game for that is a kind of like a be-all, end-all fan experience that's fully grounded in technology and allows us to do some new things in the sport, like we can resume the no-reentry rule and potentially that people leave the ballpark during the game and still come back in, which in a city like this is an amazing concept, right? And so as we're working that project, which is super fun, amazing project that we hope to see come to fruition next season. That's all being done on Asana and on this platform. And I couldn't really fathom bringing that team together in the way that we've brought it together, just given all the folks like inside the organization, outside the organization or our partners with outside counsel with all these like folks are very invested in the end product.
Catherine Buan
executiveJust one more question, and then we'll turn to the audience.
Anne Raimondi
executiveYes. One, I'm very excited about that, especially when you talked about the frictionless entry and like knowing what people's favorites are as the concession stand, because then I know my [indiscernible] are going to be there when I come to the stadium. So looking forward to that. As you look forward, maybe I'll just end with -- as you look forward to where you are taking the technology platform at the MLB, what are some of the things like you're most excited about or you and your team are spending the most time sort of investing in going forward?
Neil Boland
attendeeYes. So going back to -- there's obviously improving the fan experience on the field here at the ballpark. But we also see that fans want that corresponding digital experience. And so we continue to like reinvest in what we're delivering from a personalization standpoint. So really understanding things like where those 2 merge. So the digital experience needs the physical experience. Like we have a group for that, the digital group, it is kind of cool. And so they're looking at those points of like reengagement. And so we're doing a lot of R&D and a lot of delivery and testing and piloting in those areas. So that, I think, is going to be really cool and people will continue to see that intersection grow and grow and grow. And then on field is another area that we're investing a lot of energy in and think you've seen kind of like a lot of the changes that Baseball's announced to make the game more manageable for the fan. So we, like I think others, want to make sure that the length of the game is reasonable and that there aren't unnecessary delays. And we want to make sure we keep the integrity of the game high, too. So you see things like PitchCom and you see things like we're looking at automatic balls and strikes and technologies like that, which are transformational and amazing. So those are being tested kind of out of the majors and the kind of the minor league system and where we get real feedback from passionate fans, but also players that are either down from the majors or going up to the majors and that really helps us course correct. But the kind of the commonality across all these projects is that we have like a really great technology team inside and outside of baseball and back to the team of this event. We're using really good foundational tooling to keep them all marching towards the same end game there.
Catherine Buan
executiveWhy don't I take some questions from the audience. We'll start in the back with Andrew. Can you please say your name, because we have an audience on the audio, name and company and then the question, and I'll repeat the question.
Andrew DeGasperi
analystAndrew DeGasperi from Berenberg. Maybe, Neil, I thought it was interesting when you mentioned how you were a long-time user and you wanted to adopt the platform more broadly, basically, it took a few years to get people over to learn and get over the learning curve and to get to broader adoption. I was just wondering maybe, first of all, was this a top-down effort from your perspective? Or was it from the ground up for the teams sort of organically trying to work closer together? And then maybe for Anne, how did -- I guess, did those time line shrink? Are they -- does it take a few years for people to really get more comfortable using it?
Anne Raimondi
executiveYes, I'll let Neil start.
Neil Boland
attendeeYes. So for me, my role started to shift a bit from the CISO work more to the CIO work and I took more and more responsibility for that part of the organization. And the central entity that is MLB is intended to be a shared service organization for the clubs and even internally for all the different groups, we have tickets.com, we have MLB network. We have all these different businesses. And I thought the best way to go about this was to create something that people could relate to, and I already had it, in terms of my use of these tools, this platform. But I also didn't want to be prescriptive either. So that's why I took my time. I mean it could have been -- it would be easy to pull the lever and be like, hey, this is the new standard. This is all the health staff is going to support you with anything else you're off the reservation. But I really want to understand like how people were doing their work and like I don't want to make a mistake of like, hey, I happen to love this platform, but is it the right platform for what they need to do. So I went through a thoughtful process with them. And I think the cool thing about going through that process was I learned how they did business. And then we had like really good conversations, my team and I, with those stakeholders. And then we started to like go one-by-one against the reference platform and say like, all right, well, this meets your needs. And here's why we're all on the same platform, it will be better for you because you'll do more collaboration stuff that these guys create over here that's usable by you. You don't have to do that. And so that's how we pitched it. So I probably took a bit of a slower path because I also want to like still be popular at the end of the day and like not have people hating on me, but we got to a good place by going through that methodical approach.
Anne Raimondi
executiveAnd Andrew, I'll answer your question in terms of across other larger companies, what do we see can we accelerate that? I think some of the things, both product investments we're making and then team investments and customer success, we are seeing in larger accounts when we do a combination of things. We've been running large internal trainings at some of our largest accounts where several hundreds, sometimes several thousand employees will join. And they're actually both learning about Asana, the platform, but seeing how their colleagues are running cross-team collaboration, use cases on Asana. And those have really accelerated adoption in a lot of our larger accounts. And then some of the product innovation that Alex and team are doing is even sort of like custom help within the enterprise tier. And so really as new employees come on to the platform, they're not just learning how to use Asana, but they're learning how their organization wants them to collaborate. So whether it's through template, sort of custom training, a custom path. And so those in combination product and people for our enterprise accounts, we are seeing can accelerate what sometimes is an organic in the past, in organic growth.
Catherine Buan
executiveNext question. Let's go right here, and then we'll do Brent next.
Unknown Analyst
analystJackson Ader, MoffettNathanson. Thanks for doing this, Neil. The question is really about the difference in your use of Asana between discrete events and like a bigger picture, right? Because if you think about baseball like these thousands of discrete games, season, international things, discrete, discrete, discrete. And then how do you make sure that you also zoom out and think, well, in a couple of years, this is where we would like to be, whether it's from a technology stack or a collaboration stack. How does your use of Asana differ between those 2 things?
Neil Boland
attendeeYes. So I think, if anything, we want to see more consistency on the regular season games and such. And I think when you look at it through the lens of like Asana like, hey, like we can create greater efficiency here, because I see like this step is being partially done by 2 different groups. And 1 should be taking this and running with it, yada, yada, yada. When you get into like things, for example, this -- we just changed the playoff format to have more teams in the playoffs. And so there was 1 shot taken at like a wild card, right, in terms of like thinking after we don't think it worked out really well. And then the learnings from that will evolve like that template. And I think that will be relevant for the next cycle, and we'll just continue to improve and such and add to it. And we see ideas popping in there, like people will comment about like, hey, we could have done this. And that kind of is there, but then that moves into a consideration for the next season. On the international side, you're right, like all those can be like unique, but there are a lot of common themes there. And sometimes, you'll have different teams participating depending on which country that event is sitting in? Do we have an office in that country, like what's our setup? But the cool thing is, if you have a template for it, at least people who might not have done that before, or were doing it a different way because that country doesn't have an office in it, and they're like with the Federation, like you now know that like there is a playbook for that, right? But we also use the platform for our idea structure in terms of like, hey, let's take that, let's elevate it, move it over here and then in the off season, not that there is that much of an off season anymore. But in the in between, we can evaluate that and see if it's something that we could or should be doing differently. I think it's a better repository to put these things in by far than e-mail, know the service to those platforms. But you need some more structure to like put this. And as I said, it's been like a bit of a missing ingredient for us. And we've used other platforms like we've used like -- got stage here which is great when you're doing technology, but not really great when you're trying to get business people oriented around it.
Catherine Buan
executiveAwesome. We have Brent and after Brent.
Brent Bracelin
analystGood afternoon. Brent Bracelin with Piper Sandler. Neil, thank you for opening up your ballpark to us this afternoon. It's been great on sharing your views. First question, if you could just maybe expand on the size and scope of the deployment of Asana today? It sounds like it's been an effort to standardize the last couple of years, maybe just frame the size and scope of it today. Is it standardized on 1 department or standardized on multiple departments? One and then two, you talked about SaaS sprawl. And I think of Asana more as a productivity tool, not necessarily a consolidation tool. So maybe talk a little bit about how Asana has helped you address some of the SaaS sprawl that you've seen out there?
Neil Boland
attendeeGreat questions, Brent. And they actually intersect nicely. I would say at Central baseball, there was definitely individual bias and department bias. And some of it was reasonable, right? So there's a product that's like in the space that's marketing, watches the marketing folks out there. And we're like, hey, we come to the table with the templates that we've already built for marketing folks and like marketing folks sold [ hook line and sinker ], like helps them, and they feel great. And there's a big credit card charge going through finance home every month, and they're off to the races. I had to go department by department and be like, hey, I get it. Like they've built this for you. That's amazing. Like your life is easier. You're doing this, you're doing that. And I went through it with them. And so then I took the time to be like, hey, would you mind like if I stole some of this and send it up on Asana. So I could like just see if we can replicate it to your satisfaction. Because the goal would be that you and I can collaborate on projects that are not those projects, but enterprise-wide products that need our help on. And so that was the value prop that I went to them with. And so the question about how much time it took, I took extra time because I wanted to know the answer legitimately. And also I wanted to show them that I went through a day in their life together. On the -- and went to repeat department by department. And then in terms of sprawl, I can tell you how many products in this space that like some of you know of, if you go look at like G2 or Forrester, the folks that are really starting to track this. And I hope the Gartner people do it too because I think it's an important area. And -- but I had sprawl in this area. And the way I found out about it was crawling into our finance, people's business and saying, hey, I need like to concur data on like people that are like charging to the technology line on their cards. I got to know what's going on here. And so that gave me visibility until like what tooling was used. Where in the old days, it was a lot easier. We're all in physical offices. And everybody is on your network, you can see where they're going, right? And the new days, where we're trying to reduce friction. And not -- we had a balanced security with friction, there's much more flexibility in people using platforms without the full knowledge and understanding of technology. So that's been educational as I talked to these people like, well, hey, like tap the brakes here like. And the beauty for me is like I cover security and technology. So you can show up on the security side and be like, hey, do you have like terms with these guys? And like -- like do you know like they have full rights to your data, like -- it's like 8 guys in the garage and like all that. And so we were able to have like a really healthy conversation to like reduce that sprawl. And all these deals, I haven't found some deals that were done that were signed off on, that were legitimate that went through the legal process and such. So -- but at the end of the day, employees want the tools that are going to make them the most effective in their job. But the trick is, employees are not experts in understanding this area, and they don't have the time to do the R&D in this area. So they're going to grab the first thing that they hear about. The thing I like hear with their colleague over a Pepsi or here or there is using, a friend, former colleague and they're going to go with it. And so my mission has been to get ahead of that, do the leg work, do it thoughtfully and show like the benefits of like us all being on the same platform. And the last part to say is now getting that out to the clubs. So it's like the club is like, hey, here's what we spent all this time and energy at a central baseball figuring out. And this is what we use with you when we're doing all these joint projects. You know what Asana is, right? And they're like, yes, I'm like, hey, like, well, we have like a framework and the framework is you can have all these centralized processes done. But you as a club, you have processes that are unique to a club. If you invest that time and energy and create like a working template, like whatever it's going to be, that most likely is immediately relevant to 29 other clubs, and that's the power of being on the same platform.
Catherine Buan
executiveFantastic. Okay. Next question with Steve. And after Steve...
Steven Enders
analystSteve Enders with Citi. I just want to follow up on the last point you made there about spreading the site to other clubs and then third parties, I guess how much is that happening today where you are pushing those processes out and spreading Asana adoption into other areas? And then as a follow-up, you mentioned that there's a lot of complex workflows that you're managing within Asana. How much were they are in partnership with you to help you kind of build those out versus this being something that was really IT driven and that you were really pushing out there?
Neil Boland
attendeeTwo great questions. Thanks. So on the first one, going out to clubs, there's 2 parts to it. So the first part is you have no choice for it, which is -- and the business model does not really help you with that. Like, so it's okay, I just added you to a task or a project, like come on in and you get this visibility and like this is greater interaction than you've ever had before with us, and it's actually in writing and you don't have to go search for it in your e-mail, it's like right there. And it keeps people accountable and engaged and all that. And so that part kind of greased the skids to them the club being like, hey, like all right, how do we change these people to like full members because now they're like banging on my door, they want to use this for their projects, do you have a structure in place for us to do that. And what I'm trying to do at the central baseball level is buy on behalf of the clubs because that helps like for efficiency and procurement and also kind of driving this. So that's been kind of like the evolution. It's had like a certain like grassroots aspect to that. And just so I get the second question right, could you just repeat that 1 more time?
Steven Enders
analystYes. Just on the -- you mentioned complex workflows and that used in Asana for that, how much was that being supported by Asana and like a partnership there to drive that versus something that you were pushing and building yourself?
Neil Boland
attendeeCool. So I would -- that's again a great question. So on that one, I would say 2 things. Asana was there. So I have to give them credit, certainly for being a good partner in that regard. But that aside for 1 second, the only way I was going to be successful at scale is for the product that we picked to be super intuitive, like I'm talking like iPhone intuitive. Because I got people in all shapes and sizes. In fact, like when you come into a ballpark and you see like some of the people that are like greeting you at the perimeter, a lot of those people are like retirees and like other folks or you might get like, we have former law enforcement folks. We have like the umpires who are like awesome at what they do, but like they're not like immersed in technology every day, right? So I like platforms that enable those audiences. And then all of a sudden, you see those guys, the umpires coming back and they're like, hey, it's really cool, like I did this. I'm like, you did that. I was like, hey, man, it's like pretty neat. So okay, I saw this feature like I was wondering how to use it. And if we -- if it's something we've already worked with before and have something to show, we do; if not, we might ask the Asana team for some help. But I have found it's one of the things that drew me to the platform a long time ago and hit my kids up with it that like it's an intuitive platform. So if you have that type of like kind of grassroots engagement, I think you get the natural curiosity of people to take it to the next level. Because now they just felt like, all right, I'm comfortable here, but I have this like more complex stuff like how do I get it done? I'd say half of them figure it out, because it's like there's a really good help capability there. The other half of them like are coming to us. But like within that, like we've already solved it for somebody before, and then we might lean on Asana for some of the others.
Catherine Buan
executiveAwesome. Awesome. I'll turn it back to Anne for last...
Anne Raimondi
executive1 more.
Catherine Buan
executiveYou want to do 1 more. Okay. Last question.
Patrick Walravens
analystIt's Pat Walravens from JMP. So have you thought about your budget for next year? You guys started down or flat, how much and what are you going to spend more on, where are you going to save money?
Neil Boland
attendeeYes. So we're in the thick of that season right now. And I think that the theme that resonates with everybody when we talk about the budget is the kind of the new way that we're doing business and how we're leaning more and more on like kind of a disparate engagement model. So I would probably tell you that during the pandemic, I started to work with our other offices, other MLB proper offices, more than ever before. And I think it was just because like we needed everybody hands on deck to pull off those pandemic seasons. And with that change and like how we work and trying to be more efficient and send less people on the road, I would never have thought, but like our amount of people that are on the road for the jewel events like the World Series and the World Baseball Classic has gone way down. And the only way that we've been able to do that is with tooling like this. So I would say we're up in this area in terms of like the tooling, because it's a [indiscernible] small supplier for us in how we want to do business. We've got people back in the office. It's great. I love that part. But like some things are not going to change back to the way they were, as you guys probably hear about and talk about all the time. And part of that is if we can get subject matter expertise to participate from wherever they are and not have to put them on scene, that's a good outcome. And so even a better outcome is they can be more effective than they were before. And I think the only way you really do that well is to have like a place for them to collaborate and be able to go back to. So we're not constantly reinventing the wheel. And so that's how I make the case here for this investment with the same point of consideration and it goes over really well.
Catherine Buan
executiveOkay. I'm going to end on force multiplier, but that was a great ending to this Q&A session. Thank you so much, Neil. Thank you, Anne, very much. Thank you for joining us. And before you get off, let me introduce Dustin Moskovitz, our Co-Founder and CEO, to the stage for a Q&A session. Thank you so much, Neil.
Dustin Moskovitz
executiveHello, everyone.
Catherine Buan
executiveAll right. Who's going to be first? Do you want to raise your hand and Pat Walravens, if you want to introduce yourself, and we'll give you the microphone.
Patrick Walravens
analystPat Walravens again. Dustin, I'm sure you just heard that, right? And I thought let me get his words right. So Neil said that Jira is great when you're doing technology but not really great when you're trying to get business people oriented around it. So there's this whole [indiscernible] Jira work management thing, I'm sure you are quite familiar. We're getting a ton of questions about it, and I would just love to hear from a competitive point of view, what your perspective is on it.
Dustin Moskovitz
executiveSure. well, just to give everyone a bit of background. I know you know [indiscernible] the company, but much deeper into their sort of product portfolio than I'd expect the average investor to me. But -- so I think Neil was talking about Jira Software. So it was really the thing that's built for software teams. Great product. We see it in a lot of our customers, and we've built some really strong integrations with both their server and cloud products. And so really see that as coexisting. I think of Jira Software as sort of a specialized form of work management in the same way that like Salesforce CRM is a specialized form of work management. And if you have a very lightweight version of those use cases, something like Asana might work well for you, but even we use Salesforce for managing our sales force. So you often need to sort of graduate to those advanced products. And then Atlassian also has a bunch of other products, including what they literally call Jira work management is the name of one of their products. That's meant to be more appealing to business users and non-software users, but the state of the -- but it's also a much simpler product than Jira software and a much, much simpler product than Asana really targeted at SMBs and VSPs. In fact, I was looking at the Atlassian website the other day. And if you go to their enterprise product section, they don't even list it, and they do list Trello, which I thought was a little surprising, but I think that's sort of a strong signal of how they feel is positioned. And so yes, really, we see Jira Software as a very sophisticated specialized form work management. They've been out in the market a very long time, launched, I think, in 2006. And so that's somebody that we see as a very strong partner. And then they have a few other products that are more targeted at the SMB space. And I think we've made it pretty clear in our earnings calls over the past year, we're very focused on moving upmarket, reaching larger enterprises. I think that's where Asana is really differentiated, where we can be a force multiplier for organizations like MLB. So that's very much how our product road map and go-to-market is focused right now.
Catherine Buan
executiveThank you. Sounds good. All right. We'll go to Brent and then we'll go to back of the room next.
Brent Bracelin
analystBrent Bracelin, Piper Sandler. One of the comments that Neil made was this idea of being an internal advocate, but really from a CIO perspective, it sounded like a typical organization might have lots of work management tools and specialized tools, but he felt the need to have control, visibility across the whole organization. Is the mindset and how you're going to market shifting where you can see more advocacy at the CIO level for Asana? And if so, how is the go-to-market approach changing there? Maybe a question for Anne and Dustin.
Anne Raimondi
executiveYes, sure. I'll start. We're definitely seeing that CIOs, especially in like upper mid-market enterprise, are part of our conversation. It depends on the organization and the vertical. Sometimes they have somebody on their team that's in charge of all employee productivity or collaboration app that really is the day-to-day owner, but the CIO is involved in that. And I would say in terms of kind of what Neil shared, we are starting to see some trends where it's not kind of fully owning it. Again, it depends on the culture of the company, generally paying attention to what teams are using and adoption and complex cross-functional workflows and being able to do those at scale are two kind of critical factors we see that certainly like CIOs and those VPs of employee engagement care about when they're thinking about planning ahead, if we are going to take a platform of choice, what matters to them. And so we're early on that, I think, in terms of this, call it, like consolidation. But we are excited in the conversations that we're in that the factors that they care the most about are ones that we've been investing in.
Dustin Moskovitz
executiveYes. I'll just add. I think Neil is a phenomenal CIO, and I think is pretty advanced in thinking about this. When we first met, he told us about how you'd really gone deep in a lot of different products and even all the way back to Lotus and like the whole history of the category. So I love it. Every CIO was as sophisticated as that. I think when they're not like Neil, they're still coming at it from a standardization perspective, they've got to deploy it. They've got to train the workforce. So it's better for them if they've got 1 tool instead of multiple. But I think they discover over time and more importantly, the department leads and the division leads discover the value of having 1 tool that's used cross-functionally, which is really where Asana is differentiated. And so when you have multiple horizontal work management tools, not the specialized ones I was talking about earlier, but tools like Asana, you still end up with your teams working in silos, duplicating work, not being able to really get on the same page without resorting back to e-mail, spreadsheets or a meeting, because those are the lowest common denominator tools across them. And so when we do see consolidation and it's still not that often, because most [ knowledge ] workers don't use any other tools. But when we do see it, that's where we really shine in the process, because you might have -- the marketing team really likes the marketing specialized product and the IT team really like IT specialized product, but Asana can work across all of them. And then when they talk about their cross-functional initiatives, that's where they're like, yes, only Asana is really going to work for that.
Unknown Analyst
analystIt is [ Sona Core ] on behalf of Panjalim Bora at JPMorgan. Dustin, in the past, you've talked about some of the separations that exist in the market between content creation, collaboration and coordination. So I'm curious how you see the market evolving as companies like Monday expand into content creation and collaboration through digital whiteboarding or companies like Box expand into task and project management. Do you see Asana kind of following a path to expand into these adjacent market categories?
Dustin Moskovitz
executiveSorry. What was the one that wasn't Monday? What was the second one?
Unknown Analyst
analystBox in task management and project management just building their capabilities over there.
Dustin Moskovitz
executiveI think I'm a little less familiar with the Box suite in that respect, I'll check it out after. The way we really think about the collaboration ecosystem overall is 3 big some lanes. So there's the content tools which is where you normally would put box, but also specialized products like Adobe or Canva, or Sigma communication, which will be flat, your e-mail client, Zoom. And then coordination is really what we think of as our category. So coordination is all about answering who's doing what by when. And we still see that any given customer wants best-of-breed solutions in each of those categories. Content communication is very complex. There's probably multiple video conferencing products and an e-mail products and chat products might be different products themselves or over time, maybe that will be from 1 vendor. But across the 3, they really want to not leave anything on the table. So we really haven't seen the fact that single vendors are offering services across that really changed the competitive landscape yet.
Anne Raimondi
executiveYes. And maybe I'll just add on, especially not with enterprise customers. We don't find that any of our enterprise customers are looking for sort of like 1 vendor to do all those.
Catherine Buan
executiveGreat. Next question, Andrew.
Andrew DeGasperi
analystAndrew from Berenberg again. Just 1 for you, Dustin. In terms of what Neil said earlier, I thought it was very interesting when he was talking about the different functional areas you're using Asana for. I thought it was a little bit outside what's normal in terms of what we hear. I was just wondering, have you gotten a wish list from those type of heavy users about additional integrations and maybe more specialized software products maybe outside of the typical -- typically what you see in the 3 Cs, content and communication in particular?
Dustin Moskovitz
executiveCan you be a little more specific on what was not normal?
Andrew DeGasperi
analystWell, more like, for example, finance functions, things like that, that I don't usually hear that. I mean obviously, back office in terms of software, there's a lot of specialized software products that maybe could be integrated within Asana, maybe just expanding on that a little bit.
Dustin Moskovitz
executiveYes, absolutely. I think that some of that is more common for us. And -- but we do think that the larger, more sophisticated deployments like MLB, they're really the leading edge of product market fit. And so when we're trying to figure out our product road map, by the way, our head of product, Alex is in the room here, and will be at the cocktail hour. That's who we're talking to, because they're trying to pull functionality off our hands. Sometimes that is additional flexibility or customization or power in the product itself and sometimes it's specialized integrations. But usually, those customers still also very much value the sort of broad-based adopted tools in those other categories. But over time, yes, we've been getting into more specialized like the Tableau integration, sales force integrations. I think that comes from a lot of those conversations. And we're very keen on opening up the space of those. I think we've got an exciting road map over the next few quarters just in terms of the sheer volume of integrations that we're able to support, especially with our new workflow automation tools and the workflow builder. So a lot of the way we're thinking about the product right now is really handing off control flow in these workflows from Asana to the other tools, new tool set in a really seamless way. And we know as we get into these more sophisticated deployments, we're going to need to be able to handle the long tail. Did my audio drop out?
Catherine Buan
executiveNext question. John.
Unknown Analyst
analystThis is John Beon on behalf of Brent Thill of Jefferies. So as we now there seems to be a lot of use cases, potential to really go cross-function cross-department, a lot of room for product expansion. So a lot of opportunities but as well as investment needs. So the question is how are you thinking about balancing growth versus and the profits? And what are the best places where you could also see leverage?
Dustin Moskovitz
executiveYes. Well, obviously, a big topic for all companies right now, and something we're thinking a lot about and definitely been managing the company in a pretty different way this year to be candid. We've talked about it on some of the earnings calls, but starting -- really in Q1 just started to really moderate our plans, moderate our spend. And I think your question was more oriented around product and R&D, but a lot of our cost center is really in sales and marketing. And so really moderated headcount across the board, but also moderated programmatic spend in those areas. And so we're already -- I think we're very fortunate to be in an exploding category like work management, because in spite of all the headwinds, it's still growing. And so we're able to grow into our OpEx and blow up at a pretty good pace, not like maybe we had hoped for at the very beginning of the year, but still growing very well. So a lot of it for me is making sure that we've still got the resources in the right places where we're still getting the most efficient return on investments. And so we're looking a lot more on a per channel basis with go-to-market on a regional basis. And then on the product road map, yes, where we're going to get the most bang for our buck by improving things on the margin. But I think the beauty of the Asana Work Graph and the way we conceptualize the product is we really have built these really powerful building blocks that could then be put together in ways that specialize into those different use cases and different vertical segments without a ton more R&D on our side. It's really taking these powerful constructs we've built in terms of the ability to customize the schema, customize the workflow, customize the UI and then creating workflow automation to put them together in the right ways. And some of that doesn't even require R&D. It's really our customer [ success ] or sales solutions or sales engineering going in with customers and helping them figure out how to put together those building blocks in the right way. So I feel pretty comfortable that we don't need to make major investments in order to really tackle the broad market in that way. And we still have very sizable R&D teams. So we're going to be able to get quite a lot out of the existing OpEx on global on that part of the business.
Unknown Analyst
analystJackson Ader at MoffettNathanson again. Okay. So just kind of following up, I guess, on that, but a little bit more specific to your actual investment from last month. What is it about whether -- what are some of the specific things that you feel like are mission critical to the story of this company, like the long-term future of this company that you said like, I need to make this investment, right? Like we need the cash infusion in order to do these things for the future. And then the flip side of that is, is there any worry about creating -- I realize it's odd because it's like it's your company, it's your money, but creating some sort of like moral hazard, where maybe the market was signaling that some of the things you're doing are not worth doing. And because of the investment, now you might still end up doing those things that might not be worth it?
Dustin Moskovitz
executiveOkay, multi type of question. I think from the company's perspective -- sorry, from my own perspective as the investor, but from the company's perspective, what we really wanted was to extend runway. And the company decided this was the deal that was most favorable to see that, while also considering other options. But we didn't think of it as we're going to extend runway and also step on the gas and increase our investments and increase burn. We just wanted to make sure that we had a good cushion as we're going into this adverse situation and that we weren't getting too close to the sort of bottom of the bank balance. I definitely take your point that maybe from the employee perspective, it looks like maybe like everything is fine, we're flowing in money. I don't think that's really what's happening inside the company. People pay attention to the news. They frankly read what you all say about us. They know we have to watch our burn, and we're talking about it quite a bit. And we've pulled back in a lot of areas. We haven't added anything to the road map in the middle of this crazy kind of situation. So definitely something we are mindful of. And I think of that as more a cultural thing and like how we manage the company, how we message it and we're talking about focusing on fewer things right now and making sure that we're getting return on investment as best as we can in every area. And we've done a lot of regrouping. I talked about the region thing, for example. Demand has generally been resilient for the category, but not everywhere. And so we've needed to redirect some of our resources from one country into another, where we're seeing more strength. And nobody is getting additional budget as part of any of those conversations and a lot of people are getting less budget.
Catherine Buan
executiveAll right. I get to ask the last question. The last question is Dustin, how do you see the work management industry evolving over the next 5 years? And what could drive increasing enterprise adoption?
Dustin Moskovitz
executiveGreat. So yes, so just thinking about the long arc, I've been in Asana a long time. But the long arc, so if we were sitting here 5 years ago, [indiscernible] Work Management was a named category yet. We're still sort of talking about, is this going to be a thing or people are just going to keep doing e-mails and maybe Google sheet is good enough. It's got comments now. I think that's like all in the past. And sitting here in 2022, it's clear it's an established category. From my perspective, it feels like they can't believe that 10 years from now, every [ channel's ] worker is going to have one of these products. But we're still in a place where people are still thinking about it as a better version of sheets and e-mails and meetings. And so they're still basically doing the same kind of workflows and behaviors that they were doing with those products, but now with better tooling. But to Neil's point, I think what more customers are now realizing is the art of the [indiscernible](63:04) is on them partially because we go in and tell them about it, but partially because the tools have been in the ecosystem a lot longer. So even if you're new to Asana, maybe you've used one of the other work management products and you've got the sort of 1 on 1 on what I'm going to do with [indiscernible](63:16) board or collaborative calendar. But now you're getting into, well, what do I do when I have the task connected to high-level portfolios and levels of portfolios and all the way up to higher-level goals. How can I automate status update reporting and build these really rich dashboards that cut across all these projects and cut across teams. How can we make smarter decisions once we have that map of the work across the entire organization. And again, I'm speaking to the Asana differentiators here because this is how we really think about the category and how we thought about it the whole time. So 5 years from now, I'm hoping that sophistication continues to build. You have more CIOs like Neil that really did it, analysts, investors, customers are understanding what's really possible when you've got work management that has thought about this from the ground up and who really integrates what has historically been separate categories and OKRs and project portfolio management and reporting and then task and project management. What happens when you really have that work graph across the entire company. That's what I think the next 5 years will look like, and we're going to go build it and prove it.
Catherine Buan
executiveI love it. Well, it's a helpful way to end the day. Okay. So a couple of things before we go to cocktail. First, I want to thank the Asana events team, our AV team in the back and for Eva Leung and Jamie Randolph for producing this using Asana, of course. And also a couple more introductions. Some of you already know a lot of our management team, but we have Tim Wan, our Chief Financial Officer in the back, who will be available at the reception. Also, Alex Hood and Saket Srivastava, who's our CIO, who we'd love to introduce you to because he just started a few months ago. And I think we have a couple of special guests too. We have [indiscernible] from the Giants and our very own [ Asana ] mascot Yeti. I would invite you to the stage, but I don't want you to knock anything down. Can you make it? All right. Well, we'll just have Anne and Dustin come out, Neil come down, we should do a photo shoot with everybody and the mascot. Thank you so much, everybody, for coming. Please join us for cocktails. Thank you.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Asana, Inc. transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Asana, Inc. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.