AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

January 9, 2024

London Stock Exchange GB Health Care Pharmaceuticals conference_presentation 41 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

James Gordon

analyst
#1

Good afternoon. I'm James Gordon, JPMorgan European pharma and biotech analyst. And today, I've got the pleasure of introducing the AstraZeneca presentation. So you're going to hear from AstraZeneca CFO, Aradhana Sarin. Thank you very much for joining us today, Aradhana. Really looking forward to the presentation.

Aradhana Sarin

executive
#2

Thank you, James, and JPMorgan for hosting us this year. Good afternoon, everyone. It's a pleasure to be here with all of you to share the remarkable progress that AstraZeneca has made over the course of 2023 and explain some of the factors that underpin our confidence in delivering industry-leading growth through 2030 and beyond. On this slide, you'll see some of our forward-looking statements, which I urge you to take a moment to review when you have a chance. This is an exciting time to be at AstraZeneca. In the first 9 months of 2023, we delivered $34 billion in revenue with ex-COVID medicines up 15% versus 2022, and we look forward to sharing our full year results early next month. In the 3 years since we announced the Alexion acquisition, we have transformed our R&D and commercial business to focus on 5 key disease areas: oncology, cardiovascular renal medicines, respiratory and immunology, vaccines and immune therapies and rare diseases. Our ambition is to be leaders in these disease areas meaning achieving, at least, the top 3 position in each one by 2030. We also have an ambition to launch 15 new molecular entities by 2030 and are very much on track to achieving that goal. Our total revenue growth is relatively derisked versus our peers, given our strong performance across all disease areas and our broad geographic footprint. We are one of the most global pharma companies. And we see strong momentum ahead, including in emerging markets where we deliver 20% growth in the first 9 months of 2023 with 37% growth outside of China. As I mentioned, our portfolio is focused in 5 core disease areas, and we see strong growth potential from each one out to 2030. Within oncology, we expect continued strong growth supported by our differentiated commercial portfolio, innovative life cycle management and high potential NME launches, including our AKT inhibitor, Truqap; our TROP2 targeted ADC Dato-DXd; and our novel next-generation oral SERD, camizestrant, which is currently in Phase III development. Within CVRM, we expect Farxiga to continue to grow this year. And for CVRM overall, we anticipate broadly stable revenue through 2027 with renewed growth thereafter, driven by DAPA fixed-dose combinations, baxdrostat monotherapy in hypertension and Wainua in ATTR amyloidosis. We expect strong growth from our R&I business driven by recently launched medicines, including Fasenra, Breztri, Tezspire, Saphnelo and Airsupra, which will more than offset any impact from loss of exclusivity from older medicines such as Symbicort. V&I represents an emerging growth area with the approval of Beyfortus last summer and the recent acquisition of Icosavax, which brought a Phase III-ready novel RSV hMPV vaccine into our portfolio. We also see upside potential with our next-generation prophylactic COVID-19 antibodies. We've made significant progress in our rare disease business, accelerating the conversion from Soliris to Ultomiris, and building a diversified pipeline within and beyond complement. Through 2030, C5 growth will come from continued adoption in neurology indications coupled with new indication expansion. We've previously stated that we expect to deliver industry leading growth through 2030 and beyond. And as you can see, our confidence is underpinned by growth expectations across all our business areas. Our late-stage pipeline has continued to grow with over 120 trials in Phase III or proceeding to registration, which represents 65% of our total pipeline volume. On the right-hand side, you will see our breast cancer map, which outlines our launched medicines and those in development. As you can see, we are attempting to address the entire spectrum of breast cancer and in doing so, transform how the disease is managed. We are applying the same approach across many other tumor types in oncology as well as in cardiovascular, renal and respiratory diseases. Addressing diseases holistically leads to more meaningful engagement with prescribers and makes AstraZeneca the partner of choice for study sites. Over the course of 2023, we have invested around $4 billion in value-enhancing business development transactions. This is quite a step-up compared to 2022. Here, you'll see select BD transactions spanning collaboration agreements, asset and full company acquisitions. What is important here is to emphasize our approach to business development. We focus on novel technologies and molecules that have the potential to contribute the next wave of growth in the latter part of the decade and beyond. We always seek opportunities where we can add exponential value, capitalizing on our development and commercial expertise in our disease areas of focus. Next, I want to spend a few moments on each of our focused disease areas to cover key commercial opportunities for growth as well as just a few of our high-value emerging pipeline assets. In oncology, our growth outlook is clear as we work to reinforce our leadership position in focused tumor areas and win in competitive markets. Within lung cancer, we remain confident that Tagrisso monotherapy will remain frontline standard of care in EGFR-mutated lung cancer with opportunity to enhance efficacy through chemotherapy and ADC combinations. We're looking forward to the LAURA trial readout in the first half of the year, which should unlock the opportunity to move this medicine into Stage III unresectable disease. With the remarkable clinical data and HER2 has set a new bar for ADCs and is the undisputed HER2-targeted ADC of choice in breast, gastric and lung cancers. We're continuing to move in HER2 earlier in treatment and the DESTINY-PanTumor02 study has given us an exciting tumor-agnostic opportunity. The FDA granted this study breakthrough designation, and the NCCN guidelines have already been updated for endometrial and cervical cancers. Imfinzi, inclusive of Imjudo, has seen a renewed growth in lung, liver and GI tumors. We also further see opportunities for growth in perioperative lung cancer and in combination with PARP inhibitors and ADCs across a number of new tumor types. Lynparza remains by far the leading PARP inhibitor globally across 4 tumor types. From here, we have the opportunity to drive additional value in both the prostate and endometrial cancer settings. We will also share clinical data for saruparib, our PARP1 selective currently in Phase III for hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, and we expect to initiate several new Phase III studies for this compound later this year. We continue to see market-leading new patient adoption for Calquence in CLL, and we're looking forward to the outcomes of several ongoing Phase III studies in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma. Lastly, our most recent approval -- oncology approval, Truqap, is a clear example of AstraZeneca succeeding where others have failed. This medicine is delivering on the potential of AKT inhibition in breast cancer with a differentiated molecule and innovative dosing schedule. We are only just getting started with Truqap and are looking forward to the results of several Phase III studies already in progress in triple negative breast and prostate cancers. We're focused on achieving scale across 5 key tumor types with a clear ambition to drive deeper, more durable responses and improved survival. Key to achieving this ambition is harnessing the power of combinations in order to attack cancer from multiple angles. We've made exciting advances across a broad range of scientific platforms, and we are far from complacent, investing now to lead the next generation of transformative medicines. We're building a leading portfolio of cell therapies, radio conjugates, immune engagers and epigenetic targeted medicines that we hope will drive revenue growth well beyond 2030. On the right-hand side of the slide, I want to highlight just 2 examples of how we are aiming to lead in high-value markets. Firstly, the global IO market has exploded in value since 2015 and is projected to reach over $90 billion by the second half of the decade. We have developed a portfolio of next-generation IO bispecifics that have the potential to replace currently approved checkpoint inhibitors, offering the promise of better efficacy and tolerability. Secondly, the ADC revolution is still ramping with a projected market value of close to $40 billion by 2028. Currently, in addition to HER2 in Dato-DXd, we have 5 wholly owned novel ADCs already in the clinic. We're also making good progress in developing predictive diagnostics to better select patients that will benefit most from these medicines. This year, you will also see new data from our ongoing IO and ADC combination studies. We hope these data will further increase confidence in the potential for these medicines to comprehensively replace first-generation checkpoint inhibitors and systemic chemotherapy. Our biopharmaceutical business is focused on CVRM, R&I and V&I. Each of these growth pillars holds high-value opportunities, many of which are underappreciated by the market. CVRM continues to deliver strong double-digit growth with 16% in the third quarter of 2023 and 18% in the first 9 months. Looking ahead, we are building a robust portfolio of late-stage programs with high potential new medicines. Recent R&I launch medicines continue to drive momentum, reinforcing our presence in key disease areas like asthma, COPD and SLE. This year, we also launched Airsupra, a potential blockbuster to treat asthma. Airsupra is the first rescue medicine to address both obstruction and underlying inflammation. V&I represents an emerging growth opportunity and our recently announced acquisition of Icosavax will help accelerate our plans. Taking a closer look at our maturing CVRM pipeline, we have a number of high-potential late-stage molecules. Wainua received its first approval in ATTR polyneuropathy at the end of last year. This is our first launch in amyloidosis, and the Phase III study in ATTR cardiomyopathy is ongoing, which represents a substantial market opportunity with up to 500,000 patients across the G7 countries. Baxdrostat, a novel aldosterone synthase inhibitor, has significant potential to help over 7 million patients with treatment-resistant hypertension. We are rapidly advancing baxdrostat into Phase III, both as monotherapy and in combination with DAPA. We have initial Phase I results in-house for oral PCSK9, which has highlighted its potential differentiation versus other agents in development, with competitive lipid lowering and limited food interaction. We look forward to sharing this data at an upcoming conference. Lastly, we announced an in-licensing agreement with Eccogene for AZD5004, a potentially differentiated oral GLP-1 receptor agonist. What makes AZD5004 attractive is its encouraging efficacy at low doses, its 70% bioavailability, which we hope will lead to differentiated tolerability profile with limited need for dose titration. In addition to all these novel medicines that each have blockbuster potential, we're also advancing DAPA fixed-dose combinations at pace. Within R&I, we are rapidly advancing novel medicines and mechanisms within asthma and COPD. We see significant opportunity to increase biologics penetration with Tezspire, particularly for those patients with more severe disease and are making good progress. With almost 400 million patients diagnosed with COPD, there remains substantial runway for Breztri, which is already the fastest-growing triple fixed dose combination. We're also advancing late-stage COPD trials of tozorakimab, a novel IL-33, Breztri, Fasenra and Tezspire with several late-stage readouts expected this year. Airsupra is an exciting new growth driver, and we've been encouraged by its reception from the clinical community thus far. Early data for cell therapies has indicated the potential for remission or even cure across immune-mediated diseases. As a result, we are increasing our focus on cell therapy substantially as a company, including in immunology. This is clear from several of our recent deals where we have further strengthened our portfolio and capabilities. In V&I, we are sharpening our strategy, focusing on serious respiratory illness and building a portfolio of novel vaccines and monoclonal antibodies. We're focused on key respiratory pathogens. And with the recent Icosavax transaction have added virus-like particles to our portfolio. IVX-A12, a novel combination vaccine against both RSV and HMPV, leverages innovative virus-like particles to boost the immune response and forego the need for adjuvants. RSV and HMPV are two of the most concerning respiratory viruses, and the RSV vaccine market alone is a $10 billion market. IVX-A12 is the first vaccine aiming to protect against both viruses simultaneously and has potential for better tolerability than currently approved RSV vaccine. This vaccine has already received fast track designation from the FDA. Since launch, the demand for Beyfortus has also been very strong, and we are working hard to make sure it reaches its full potential globally. Shifting to our final disease areas of focus, rare diseases. Our C5 franchise continues to see durable growth driven by neurology and geographic expansion. Growth in the latter half of the decade will be driven by additional indications. We've also initiated the first Phase III trial for ALXN1850, a novel next-generation enzyme replacement therapy, which is being investigated in HPP. We see the opportunity to more than double the addressable population compared to Strensiq with 1850 Our portfolio outside of complement continues to build, and we are excited about our leading portfolio of potential medicines to address amyloidosis, including depleters. [indiscernible], a first-in-class light chain fiber depleter, is the only medicine in development for the most severe form of light chain amyloidosis, and we expect the first Phase III data later this year. ALXN-2220 is another novel depleter, and the Phase III trial has been initiated for the treatment of severe ATTR cardiomyopathy. ALXN-2220 also has the potential to be used in combination with TTR stabilizers or silencers to more comprehensively address the disease. We're also continuing to build our next wave of rare disease pipeline following several genomic medicine transactions in the past year. In closing, AstraZeneca is a leading global pharmaceutical company with clear focus on 5 disease areas. We have set strong ambition to achieve industry-leading growth while improving profitability without sacrificing investment in new high-value pipeline programs. Importantly, we're a leader in sustainability and are on track to achieve our high bar of ESG goals across access to health care and ambition zero carbon. We're a global organization driven to follow the science and improve outcomes for patients. As part of that mission, we need to continuously build our pipeline with high-value differentiated assets and technologies in order to secure our long-term growth ambition, which is key to delivering our value for our shareholders. With that, I would like to thank all of you for your interest in AstraZeneca and the future that we're building for all of you, for ourselves, for the patients and for the planet. And with that, I'd like to invite my colleagues, Sharon, Dave and Iskra onto the stage for Q&A.

James Gordon

analyst
#3

Great. Thank you for the presentation. And as is the usual format, we've got about 20 minutes for questions. I've got a few questions, but if anyone from the audience would like to ask a question first, please raise your hand. In that case, you might get a question from me to start with. Maybe the first question, a broader question, which should be Astra's top line growth and top line growth out to 2030. I think last year, you commented that Astra can achieve above-industry growth. But what's your latest thinking about how quickly industry growth actually is? And how -- by what extent do you think you can beat the industry? Are you going to be slightly above the industry? Or could you be way above the industry?

Aradhana Sarin

executive
#4

So we talked about our ambition in the second half of the decade to sort of 2025 to 2030 to have an industry-leading growth. Industry growth generally in pharma is about 3%. Our growth rate in sort of 2021 through 2025, we've set a target for double-digit growth. And I think we're very much on track to achieve that target. So while we've not given an exact number, we do aim high. So I think somewhere in between that range. But more importantly than the exact number is actually the confidence that we have in delivering that growth ambition. And as I shared just now, the confidence is underpinned by the existing medicines with their existing indications, the existing medicines with new indications and the life cycle management. And then the opportunity for 15 new medicines on top of that. And during that time frame, we don't have -- we have only a few LOEs. So it's really all about driving growth, and those are the 3 key elements of driving that growth.

James Gordon

analyst
#5

Maybe one follow-up question, which would be, if I look at what at least sell-side consensus model is faster at the moment, it doesn't really have above-industry growth in the second half of the decade. There's quite a slowdown modeled. So where do you think there's a disconnect? What is the market missing versus what the company is seeing?

Aradhana Sarin

executive
#6

I think most of the consensus or analyst models obviously do not model the 15 new NMEs, right? Until they're approved, maybe they're not modeled. I also think that probably they do not model many of the new indications that we've planned. And really when you think of the portfolio of bispecifics or the ADCs and the bispecifics could leapfrog kind of directly into Phase III, which is sort of what we're doing, a lot of that is not really modeled into consensus. And so I think it's not just one element where there's a disconnect. I think it's the -- it's multiple elements, and I think it's also the confidence in those elements. We have this growth ambition, and that is on sort of a risk-adjusted basis because we know not everything is going to work. But I think there are multiple elements where I don't think we still get credit.

James Gordon

analyst
#7

Maybe one other question, effectively a financial question, which business development. You've been quite busy, and you've highlighted quite a few of the deals you've done in the last year. Was that an exceptional year? And are you sort of done on BD for a while, and you now got to do a lot of integration? Or is this the new normal that Astra is going to keep on being able to do these many acquisitions, you've got room to do with this integration?

Aradhana Sarin

executive
#8

So I don't think we define a target at the beginning of the year. We always start with strategy and say, "Okay, what is really our vision and what is our strategy." And if you look at a number of the acquisitions or BD transactions that I highlighted, each one of them is on point on strategy. The strategy being leaders in the TAs that we want to be in, right? Oncology, cardiovascular, metabolic disease, et cetera. It is where we can add a lot of value, whether it's because of our clinical expertise, our commercial expertise, our ability to do combination studies. So where can we add a lot of value? So that's another element. And then looking at what gaps are there, where when we look at like the tumor maps, we're looking at all diseases holistically, whether it's renal disease or cardio metabolic disease or various tumors and where do we need to -- where are things we're developing on our own and where are things we may need to complement. And so those are sort of the elements through which -- the lens through which we look at transactions. And we don't need to do anything, but as that strategy evolves, things happen.

James Gordon

analyst
#9

And it looks like there's quite a lot going on in the pipeline, both organic and also some inorganic recently as well. Is that going to require a big step-up in investment in terms of profitability as well? Is R&D going to need to go up to fund all this activity?

Aradhana Sarin

executive
#10

So we do have a lot of exciting stuff in the pipeline. And in some ways, there's always this tension between -- we've given sort of guardrails that we would have our R&D as a percentage of revenue, sort of in the low 20s percentage. And that guardrail sort of forces in some ways prioritization. That being said, we do want to fund high-value opportunities. We just did the licensing deal on the GLP-1. We -- hopefully, we'll close the Icosavax transaction recently, and again that's a big opportunity. So we're constantly prioritizing and getting efficient and more productive in order to drive and invest in that growth.

James Gordon

analyst
#11

Maybe talking about one of the pipeline assets. I know we've got David as well, so oncology commercial. Dato-DXd and lung cancer, where are we on the filing for that in the U.S.? And also, can you talk about where are we on both overall survival data and the biomarker that you may be looking at as well?

David Fredrickson

executive
#12

So we certainly hope that Dato will be the next new oncology medicine that we're able to launch at AstraZeneca. In terms of where we are in filing, would be our hope and expectation to be able to communicate a filing acceptance this quarter. We also aim to have a nonsquamous label in terms of what our goal and our objective coming in to the work is. And I think that, that's the right way to approach this given the data sets and what we saw out of the data that we shared with ESMO. And then in terms of overall survival. We've seen already and we shared the data, a trend in overall survival not only in the ITT population, which was a 0.9 hazard ratio, but also in the nonsquamous population where we saw a hazard ratio of 0.77. And I think importantly, we'll get final analysis that will be event-driven but is likely to read out during the FDA review period. And I think we have good expectations that OS should, at least, be the same, if not improve. And the reason for that is that we know that patients with actionable genomic alterations represent more of the patients without events yet. And we know that those patients tend to do better on data from what we've seen so far.

James Gordon

analyst
#13

And in terms of the TROP2 biomarker and the approach you're taking there. Is that something that you're filing for the TLO1 approval? Or is that more something that might be incorporated into future trials for the product?

David Fredrickson

executive
#14

It's really the latter. So the biomarker is very exciting, and the biomarker work that we're doing with the ADCs is core to the medium- and long-term strategy of being able to more precisely target these really, really important agents. The biomarker work is, right now, work that we've done to retrospectively look at the TROPION-Lung01 data and be able to see in that, that there is, in fact, a prediction of efficacy for Dato-DX based upon the biomarker. We'll need to now incorporate that prospectively into future studies moving forward. And we've got the ability to be able to do that in a handful of studies that are ongoing but also in new studies that we would start. But I also think that the data will be useful as a part of the discussions that we'll have with agencies to potentially begin to explain some of the biology that sits behind histology and what we've seen in the data so far.

James Gordon

analyst
#15

And is this a biomarker that could be applied to lots of different tumors or might it need to be calibrated differently from the tumors? And could you use this biomarker or this approach for any TROP2-targeting ADC?

David Fredrickson

executive
#16

So what's important about the biomarker approach, it's computational pathology, so it's both taking digital scans of IHC slides but then also applying an algorithm on top of that. And it is very much drug and tumor and setting-specific. So the expertise is being able to put this together and to understand how we can select patients is something that's a platform, if you will. I think that the specific application of the biomarker for lung cancer will be different than what we would find for the features of the slides that the computer is looking at for other tumor types.

James Gordon

analyst
#17

And maybe just one follow-up would be, overall survival, there's been some debate in the market. Do you need to have a statistically significant benefit on overall survival to file an oncology drug like Dato now? What are your thoughts on that?

David Fredrickson

executive
#18

Well, we made the decision to file TLO1 based upon conversations at high-level results that we had with FDA. So to very specifically answer your question, I think that the need to file isn't contingent upon necessarily having that endpoint. I think that the totality of data is important. But as I mentioned before, we will certainly be providing. And we would expect the final OS to FDA and other health authorities in the process of the review. So it will absolutely be part of the discussion set and the decision set that they're making.

James Gordon

analyst
#19

One other pipeline project or program mentioned around this presentation was the bispecifics. So what data have you seen already that's given you the excitement to take these into Phase III? And what are we going to see sort of publicly in 2024?

David Fredrickson

executive
#20

Well, the data that we've seen so far, and we showcased a lot of it at ESMO just this last year but also in 2022. We've seen monotherapy data in renal cell, which we know is a CTLA-sensitive tumor. We've also seen mono combination therapy in lung cancer, again, CTLA-sensitive tumors. We've had an opportunity to see both at the 750 as well as the 1,500 milligram. The combination of all of those gives us confidence that we've got an efficacious dose and a good safety profile at the 750, which is the dose that we've brought forward into the studies that we've seen so far. And I think importantly, if we look at the data from ESMO, which was in 2022, we saw that, that was in a head-to-head comparison against pembro and chemotherapy. So I think that was certainly very, very encouraging within that. And the reason that we've got confidence in this is that we know that CTLA-4 is a validated end point, and we see that the mechanism of action of volrustomig, our CTLA-4 bispecific, is really showing that we're able to get a side effect profile that is improvement upon just having kind of your standard combination approach. And then I think with the other 2 bispecifics that are also in humans, we've seen some encouraging Phase I, Phase II data at ESMO for sabestomig, which is our TIM-3. And that's within the lung cancer setting in previously treated population. And in rilvegostomig, that opportunity to bring into the biliary tract setting, where, again, we think the landscape is ripe for this. And we see that with TOPAZ-1, our PDX with durvalumab plus chemotherapy, we see an opportunity to move a TIGIT into this segment.

James Gordon

analyst
#21

I could ask lots of oncology questions, but I'm conscious we've got Sharon Barr with us, who's now running biopharma R&D. So maybe a couple of questions there. I mean first of all, what do you think is most interesting or most exciting in the biopharma pipeline?

Sharon Barr

executive
#22

I love that question. Everybody asks me what I think is the very best molecule. I know what I often say is as a parent, I can't pick a favorite child. We have an incredibly rich, diverse and deep pipeline. So we're really standing in a very strong position. That said, if I look across the diversity of the pipeline, I can pull out a few things that I think are worth drawing attention to that I'm really excited about. Looking at the CVRM portfolio, this is really a team that's moving from strength to strength, building on the success of Farxiga and thinking about how we holistically manage people's health and their cardio, renal, metabolic disease. So thinking about Farxiga combinations, how we're combining with [indiscernible], balcinerone and baxdrostat to be able to better manage the interrelatedness of comorbidities. And then thinking further ahead about how we continue to layer on therapies that we think will help patients who currently have unaddressed disease. So thinking about, as Aradhana mentioned, the oral PCSK9 and how we can put that on top of molecules such as statins to manage dyslipidemia and give patients a better outcome. So that's a really exciting molecule to look forward to. As well as our relaxin molecule is a different way to manage hypertension and heart disease. So really excited about the way we are building on the science that we have and continuing to drive innovation in the CVRM portfolio. And then switching to the R&I portfolio. This is a team that has historically had tremendous strength in the respiratory space and is expanding broadly into immunology. Building on success with Saphnelo and asking where else can we go in chronic autoimmune diseases. And you've seen over the last year that clearly, this is a team that has an interest shared with oncology in cell therapy. So you've seen the deals that we've done with the acquisition of Neogene; the agreement with Quell for CAR-Tregs; the agreement with Cellectis to think about allogeneic CAR-Ts; and most recently, the acquisition of Gracell for clinical stage CAR-T. Because as well as oncology, we're seeing tremendous potential to change the paradigm for the way people with autoimmune disease are facing their symptoms. Beyond breaking the efficacy ceiling with layers and cycles of therapy, we have the potential to offer these people the opportunity to walk away from their disease. And we're seeing encouraging signals, both from industry trials as well as investigator-led studies such as George [ Schett's ] work, which has really seen some paradigm-shifting outcomes for patients with SLE. So I think as we look forward, that's something to be very excited about. And if you look at the level of investment that AstraZeneca is putting into cell therapy, it should be clear that we're not dipping our toes in. That we're really very invested in being able to change the way these patients are managing their disease.

James Gordon

analyst
#23

One other question would be Astra made an acquisition, an exciting space, a hot space for oral GLP-1s and Eccogene. And we haven't seen the data yet, but I think we're going to see the data potentially presented in the first half of this year. So what should we be looking out for when we see that data presented? And in particular also, what about the liver profile? That's been an area of some debate because some other agents in the class have some liver effects. What should we be looking for there?

Sharon Barr

executive
#24

So if I may, I'll answer your question within a larger context. I think that we as an industry have sort of fallen into a groove in the last year of speaking about oral GLP-1s and GLP-1 receptor agonist, in general, as obesity drugs. And I don't think we should really describe it that way. And if we think about the people that we are collectively seeking to assist, there are 64 million people worldwide who are living with heart failure. And of those 64 million, 4 out of 5 have interrelated comorbidities. 50% have some degree of renal impairment, 42% have some degree of metabolic dysregulation. And so when we are offering people an opportunity to medically manage their weight and medically manage their diabetes with oral GLP-1 receptor agonist, what we're really offering them is a better way to manage the totality of their disease and to address this as a way to help a person live a better, healthier life as opposed to small segments of their disease. So with that, we're very excited that this is part of our portfolio because I think it dovetails very nicely with the rest of the CVRM portfolio and the way that we think about how patients will be working with their care providers going forward. And this is not a new approach for AstraZeneca. I think that there is sometimes a perception that we just got into this. But this has, in fact, been a push from the research and early development team for quite some time. And to be completely transparent, the team had a GLP-1 receptor agonist, and we decided it wasn't competitive. And this is one of the hard decisions that we make in biopharma, which is to ruthlessly prioritize our own portfolios and make sure that we're really placing our best bets on molecules that we think are likely to be successful. So we shelved that. But knowing that this will be really important for treating the totality of disease, we went looking for what we thought was a molecule that was going to fill that gap in our overall strategy. And we really targeted this one because we felt like it met the target product profile. Before I get into it a little bit more, I should also say that we are very interested in both incretin and non-incretin pathways. Understanding that as we help people medically manage their weight, we are thinking about not just reduction of fat, but also maintenance of lean muscle mass. It's a way to maintain health. And so we are thinking about multiple modalities, and Aradhana touched on this in her presentation, thinking about glucagon and long-acting amylin as different mechanisms to help manage these aspects of patients' weight control and diabetes control. So when we went looking for a molecule, and we looked hard, we really liked the way this molecule stood out because we thought it had a very competitive profile. And I think Aradhana touched on some of this. We are seeing early readouts of our Phase I data, some very compelling efficacy data. It has been tested at 4 doses at the time that we acquired the molecule. We had data on 2 of those doses. We now have some book-end data. We just achieved database lock on December 29, and I am as hungry to see all of those data as you are. So we look forward to sharing the totality of that data in upcoming meeting. You asked specifically what are we looking for in this molecule. And so I think that there's 3 critical benchmarks for us. One is efficacy. We need to know that it's doing as well as we expect it to do. We need to know that it's tolerable because that's what people want in their medicine. We would love to see something that has a simpler or very minimized titration scheme so that it is easier for people and their care providers to be able to introduce that medicine. And of course, we want to have an excellent safety profile. So as we dig through the data that are just being unblinded, we'll be taking a hard look at all aspects of safety and trying to understand if there's any red flags that we need to pay attention to. I will just say at this early stage, Phase I, only just emerging. It's very encouraging, and we're excited about the path forward.

James Gordon

analyst
#25

We've also got Iskra with us who runs the V&I [ team ]. So maybe a question there would be RSV. So by the end of this year, we're going to have these 3 RSV vaccines on the market, and there are other ones in development as well. So how does Astra catch up moving into this space? I guess that would be the first question really.

Iskra Reic

executive
#26

Let me start by saying that I don't think we are catching up for a very simple reason that Icosavax deal that is still subject to closing, really includes first-in-class combination RSV, HMPV vaccine. And although there are, as you mentioned, a number of RSV vaccines already out there or in the late-stage development, we do believe that because of the similar level of the mortality and morbidity that is caused by HMPV virus as with RSV, the combination will be an important differentiator. Second important point is that this acquisition gives us the access to the protein virus-like particles platform. And we believe that the VLP vaccines have the potential to be significantly differentiated, provide a better overall vaccine profile than non-VLP vaccines. And for the, if I can say, simple reason is that virus-like particles basically have ability to mimic the virus. So when you get vaccinated, basically your immune response produce the similar strong immune response as it would be on the natural recurring viruses. And that is because it has the ability to induce the multiple receptors on the B cells of the patient. That differentiator can give you the vaccine that has better efficacy, greater, longer durability and better safety profile. So these are the kind of key factors why we are very excited about the Icosavax deal and why we believe that, that gives the innovative edge for the next-generation vaccines. And we are very pleased to have -- to, again, subject to closing, to potentially have it added to the vaccine and immune therapies portfolio.

James Gordon

analyst
#27

That's great. Well, I can see we're just about out of time. So unless there's any final questions from the audience, I should probably wrap it up there. Great. In that case, thank you very much, everyone.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete AstraZeneca PLC transcript — plus 250,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to AstraZeneca PLC earnings transcripts and 250,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.