AT&T Inc. (T) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

June 4, 2021

New York Stock Exchange US Communication Services Diversified Telecommunication Services conference_presentation 47 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

John Hodulik

analyst
#1

Okay, everybody. Good morning, and welcome to the Third Annual UBS Future of 5G Mini Conference. I'm John Hodulik. And I'm joined with Batya Levi, I think, other members of the telecom, media and communications infrastructure team. And I'm very pleased to have you for today. We've got a series of 4 speakers in panels today exploring the developments in 5G in the United States. And we're very happy to announce that our first speaker is Igal Elbaz, Senior Vice President of Wireless and Access Technology at AT&T. Igal, thanks for being here again.

Igal Elbaz

executive
#2

Good morning, John, thank you so much for having me. Such a pleasure.

John Hodulik

analyst
#3

Nice. So we've got about 45 minutes for Q&A. And as always, if anybody out there in the audience has any questions for Igal, please either e-mail myself or Batya or text us, and we will weave them into the conversation.

John Hodulik

analyst
#4

So Igal, maybe we should start off by sort of level-setting on where AT&T is on -- in terms of the -- its 5G build-out. If you could give us some color on maybe each band that the company is working on and sort of where you are in the process?

Igal Elbaz

executive
#5

Sure. John, just before we get started, let me please, with your permission, I need to call everyone's attention to our safe harbor statement. It says that some of what I'm going to share today is forward-looking and such may be subject to risks and uncertainties, and the results may be materially different than what I'm saying. For additional information, please feel free to visit our Investor Relations website, and you can find additional information. So John, first of all, it's actually great to be here and being able to share with you all the forwards that we've made at AT&T. I think we've made real good progress. And we had a great momentum, both on our business side as well as our network build. As we shared, our intent is to be the premier -- the nation's premier broadband connectivity provider. And we want to do this by providing both fixed and wireless networks. Before I get to where we are right now in terms of bands and 5G data, I do want to take a minute and go back to last year, 2020, extremely challenging year with a global pandemic. And as we shared, we saw before, I want to reiterate that the AT&T network was resilient. It was able to keep up with a surging demand and the changes in the traffic patterns. But in addition to that, our build plan also showed resiliency. And I can tell you that when COVID started, we asked ourselves will that have an impact or an effect on our bid. But I can tell you that we have completed our bid as planned. We didn't miss a beat. In July of last year, we were a nationwide 5G. In addition to that, we continue to densify the 5G network, and we completed our plant build in terms of CRAN, millimeter wave, FirstNet and fiber. And that strong momentum is now carried into 2021. So today, AT&T is the largest network in North America. Our voice and wireless and data wireless network covers more than 99% of Americans. Based on GWS, AT&T is America's Wireless Best Network (sic) [ Best Wireless Network ] for 3 years in a row. And a lot of these now resonate extremely well with our customers. As you know, over the last couple of quarters, we are seeing great success in terms of postpaid net adds, low churn in levels that we haven't seen before. So clearly, our customers really like what we're doing. We have 3 simple unlimited offers that, to be honest, actually started before COVID. And we showed consistency with those plans throughout all of that time. And they're carrying our build today, and they include 5G. And in addition to this, we've extended our 5G to all of our loyal legacy unlimited customers. And in addition to this, 5G now available to our prepaid and repeat customer with the right plan and device. Now from a build perspective, Our 5G sub-6 network is already covering more than 240 million POPs in 470 markets. Our 5G+, our millimeter wave network, is now in part of 38 cities. And I do want to take a minute here to reiterate our philosophy when it comes to millimeter wave. You're typically going to see us deploying millimeter wave in dense areas, entertainment districts, venues, stadium, airports because we think it's millimeter wave that's the experience there. And we want to deploy this where we think it matters to customers, and we can actually be seeing experiences being developed. So think something like venues or a stadium, where you can reimagine the fan experience running on millimeter wave and 5G. The other part of where we're building millimeter wave is typically with enterprises. We have very interesting demand with 5G with our enterprise customers. And typically, that comes with millimeter wave as well with our MEC solutions, our local edge. And you're typically seeing this in industries like health care, manufacturing, military, as I said, airports and others. When it comes to FirstNet -- and again, whenever I talk about FirstNet, I always want to mention a couple of things: One, we are all privileged in AT&T to be able to serve our first responders and health care professionals, for sure, in a year, like last year with the global pandemic, fires, hurricanes, et cetera, as well as FirstNet was foundational to the way we build our efficient deal, putting the foundation to everything that we have in the network. So in terms of the momentum, in terms of adoption, there's already 16,500 agencies joining the FirstNet program with 2.2 million connections. Our build now covers more than 90% of our commitment to FirstNet, and that is well ahead of schedule. We're also allowing first responder now to access our 5G+ networking in the same part of 38 cities that I mentioned. And a new site build that comes with our FirstNet in terms of rural and remote and tribal areas continue to build on our way nicely into that build. And all of this, John, is build on top of our efficient, integrated fiber build that fuels all of this. So all in all, we feel really good about our build, about where we are and the way our customers are -- we are seeing -- actually, we're seeing really strong customer satisfaction with the plans and everything that we're offering. So all of this is coming together very nicely.

John Hodulik

analyst
#6

Can you talk a little bit about the C-band spectrum that the company acquired in the auction and maybe the timing of that build-out? And then maybe tie that back into your -- the rest of the sort of sub-6 build-out and talk about spectrum gap related to 5G?

Igal Elbaz

executive
#7

Sure. So as you know, we have acquired 80 megahertz in Auction 107 of C-band, and that gets us into a place. We're very happy with our spectrum position. We are heads down in planning and engineering the deployment of the first tranche of the 40 megahertz towards the later part of the year, when it becomes available. And actually, we've adjusted the deal recently. So we're happy to report that, as you move forward in terms of the C-band bid, we're going to be around 70 million, 75 million POPs at the end of 2022 and 200 million POPs at the end of 2023. So aggressive deal but puts us in a really nice place at the end of 2023. In terms of our overall holding, so we have a strong position, both in the low band, mid-band even before C-band with AWS and PCS and other bands. And by the way, that is the grid that's going to help us to deploy our C-band spectrum. And obviously, last year -- or at the end of 2019, this is where we got all of our millimeter wave holding in terms of spectrum. So we are very satisfied with our holding. And again, we have a wide range all the way from low band, mid-band, different types of mid-bands all the way up to millimeter wave.

John Hodulik

analyst
#8

Got you. Have you guys said how much total in terms of spectrum gap? And so you got 70 million to 75 million POPs on that first 40 megahertz tranche in '22. But the -- what else on this -- in the sort of [ sub-5 ], how much total -- like let's say, by the end of '22, can you give us a number in terms of total megahertz dedicated to 5G by the end of next year?

Igal Elbaz

executive
#9

We never share publicly how much of the remaining sub-6. The way to think about this is that, over time, more and more of our spectrum holding will be redeployed and transitioned into 5G. There's a technology out there called dynamic spectrum sharing that is allowing us to do this very efficiently. If you remember, John, in previous generation, the way to move on one generation to another would be to take one of your spectrum, take out the existing one and move it into the new generation. And what dynamic spectrum sharing -- by the way, AT&T was the first to deploy it here in the U.S., in North America, really allows you to run both 4G and 5G on the same band and, as a result of that, really allow you to be really efficient and intelligent in the way that we are transitioning our spectrum into 5G. So what it allows us to do is the more customers we're having with 5G devices that are getting on the 5G network, it allows us to -- through dynamic spectrum sharing, to allow to serve both LTE and 5G customers on the same spectrum. So I can't tell you at any given time where we're going to be. But this is how -- this is the way to think about this. A transition on our existing spectrum plus C-band, that's going to be an augment for 5G-only, where we think it matters for the experiences the millimeter wave. And the remaining will transition over time based on the growth of the customer and the 5G devices based on this dynamic spectrum sharing technology.

Batya Levi

analyst
#10

John, maybe asking that question in a different way. How important was it for you to get the first 40 megahertz of a block that's going to clear up sooner? Was that a necessary add-on to the DSS or other sub-6 gigahertz deployments that you've been making?

Igal Elbaz

executive
#11

It was extremely important. We don't need DSS for C-band. But again, we've always said that this mid-band that became available with C-band is extremely important in order for us and, by the way, for the industry to scale 5G. It's that part of the mid-band. It's good, both for capacity, very friendly to 5G capabilities, both for capacity and coverage. And us having that and augment this to the already strong middle position that we have of spectrum really allows us to scale and provide more capabilities in terms of coverage and speed and capacity to our customers and starting to foster all of those use cases and immersive experiences that we're talking about that comes with 5G. So that 40 megahertz are extremely important. Again, as I said, we're heads down in making sure that we're engineering and planning this, so we can start deploying this at the end of the year.

Batya Levi

analyst
#12

Okay. Maybe can you also tie that to the new CapEx guidance, which you laid out? Gross CapEx about $21 billion this year, it's going to ramp to $24 billion over the next 3 years. What's that incremental spend coming from? Is it more this acceleration of the C-band deployment? Or is it more fiber deployment?

Igal Elbaz

executive
#13

It's both. I think we've been very clear about the fact that, that acceleration will allow us to do 2 things. One is continue to build our wireless network. C-band is a big part of this. And if you remember, from our Investor Day to today, we've accelerated the deployment of C-band in terms of numbers at the end of 2023. And at the same time, we've accelerated or expanded our fiber guidance in terms of being able to say that we're going to get into 90 metro areas this year, covering 3 million customer locations. But we will continue that pace to the point that we're going to be able to cover 30 million customer location by the end of 2025. So taking those both, that's the primary area of where we're going to see the acceleration in the investment of that capital.

Batya Levi

analyst
#14

Beyond that investment period, which is quite elevated in terms of -- in capital intensity as a percent of sales, would you expect that to start to come down beyond that -- I guess beyond '24?

Igal Elbaz

executive
#15

I think we need to get into a rhythm of the build and see where we are and see the success that comes with that. Remember, you're building in order for customers to come and consume them. So we're going to see how we're doing. We're going to see what kind of adoption we're seeing so far. Wherever we build fiber, for an example, we're seeing great success. So if that momentum will carry, we'll make our decision as we come close to that. Same thing with wireless system. Between now and 5 years, it's interesting to see how things are going to evolve, what's going to become available, what use case is going to be out there, what devices people will use, the amount of innovation and things that can change between now and 2025 in terms of the mobile economy. I don't think we can even imagine what would be there. So as we move forward, and we are seeing those things evolving and the ecosystem developing, we'll make our decision how we go beyond '24, '25.

John Hodulik

analyst
#16

Got you. Can we talk a little bit about the -- maybe more about the fiber side. We keep hearing about the sort of integrated fiber strategy. Can you give some color sort of on what that looks like?

Igal Elbaz

executive
#17

Sure. Fiber is foundational. Foundational to our network, it's foundational to any network. Fiber is what fuels our mobility network. And now with this integrated fiber build along the same routes, we can now light new neighborhoods. We can connect small, medium businesses. We can connect securely enterprises. And this is why we were reiterating that our approach is this hybrid fixed and wireless network. We believe that is the right strategy, and that was the right approach. And if we take back -- and I think we shared this in our Investor Day. Maybe I'll take a couple of minutes to reshare that. If you look at the data consumption patterns in our network, you're seeing a couple of interesting trends. One, clearly, broadband data consumption is going up, both on wireless and on fixed network. However, there's a couple of subtrends that are interesting: One, you're seeing a transition from wireless into in-house into fixed. You're seeing the pace of growth on fixed network growing in a higher rate than based on wireless network. Some of you now on this meeting are connecting from your home. And you are expecting a reliable connectivity because this is a business meeting. And you want to make sure that everything does not jitter and the quality is high. The second and -- now, no doubt that COVID was an accelerator to that fact, with us working from home and starting from home. But I don't know that it's going to stop. I think a lot of enterprises is going to move into this hybrid work environment. So a lot of this will continue. The other trend that we're seeing is that the uplink growth in data is growing at a higher rate than the downlink pace. And that comes with us doing video conferencing and opening video, user-generated content and all kind of things. And there's other more devices that are connected at the home. So the consumption in the home is going in a high rate. And for that, we think this hybrid approach is the right one, as I mentioned, getting into 90 metro areas, 3 million customer location this year. And let me maybe share a little bit about why we think fiber and access technology is a good one. First of all, you're getting 1 gig speed. And that over time is multi-gig enabled. The second thing is symmetrical. I just mentioned uplink and downlink. The fact that you can have a 1-gig uplink, which is pretty much 20x what you can get from cable. It's pretty significant. If you are a gamer or certain applications at home, low latency on fiber is really important. The fact that you have a fiber architecture makes it extremely reliable. We now have a WiFi-6 band gateway that allows you to expand your coverage and speed inside of the home, which is typically the #1 pay point of customer. We are the smartphone manager of the app that allows you to manage your connection, your devices at home. And what we're seeing is extremely high customer satisfaction. This is probably -- our fiber product has probably the highest NPS across all of our portfolio. It's higher than any of our competitors. We're seeing 70% of our gross annual fiber are actually new customers to AT&T. So a lot of good success. And we have -- same as wireless, we have 3 simple speed tiers and offers without any data caps. And what we're seeing is our customers are going up in those speed tiers that can -- lifting our output. Now John, you asked about this integrated fiber build. Going back few years in AT&T, you would see planning and engineering of fiber network for wireless completely separated from engineering and client planning of fiber for enterprise base as well as different than residential model. And what we said to ourselves is that we need to bring this together. This is something we started a couple of years ago. There's a lot of efficiency that comes with bringing those routes and fiber build together. And it starts in different parts of this. It starts, first of all, with the understanding that we need to do this. Those 3 use cases coming off the same fiber, there's a lot of efficiency of bringing them together. Our planning systems are providing us the ability to plan the routes in an intelligent way. And that comes with a lot of converged architecture in terms of -- all the way from putting a 5G back up into a gateway, from the fact that you can run different services on the same fiber; from the fact that, John, we might be talking about edge later on. The fact that all of the architecture is getting more distributed and software-based and convergent with DX allows us to -- having a converged architecture to support the different use cases from the same target architecture. So that integrated fiber build and planning gives us a lot of efficiency. And if you bring them together, you're seeing the ARPU lift with the speed tiers. You're seeing the efficiency in the bid. You're seeing the transformation that we're doing. And we can absolutely see how we are expanding our fiber EBITDA and accelerating the breakeven on customer in about a year. And put this all together, if you fast-forward 4, 5 years, now you have a solid -- like when we're getting to 30 million customer locations, you can now see a solid platform for long-term growth coming out of that investment. So we feel really good about that fiber plan and where we are in the customer adoption. And a lot of this comes with this integrated build.

John Hodulik

analyst
#18

I want to ask one follow-up on that. And I know that this is a 5G day, but obviously, access falls under your responsibilities, Igal. Now that's a great commentary there about fiber breakeven customer in about a year. I mean have the costs to deploy fiber continue to come down? I mean Batya and I go back to the introduction of Fios 15 years ago, and the economics weren't that great. But now -- but there, we were talking at least $1,500 to pass a home with fiber. Have the costs come down aggressively enough, sort of sub-$1,000 to pass a home? And ONT has gotten cheap enough, so that -- could you talk a little bit about those costs? And I guess it's now an attractive business model as far as you guys are concerned?

Igal Elbaz

executive
#19

Well, I'm not going to get into numbers, but there's no doubt that the cost structure is getting better. One of this is what I said is converged architecture that integrated this and gives us a lot of efficiency. Clearly, John, when you have the scale of building more and more miles and routes of fiber and getting into homes, the old ecosystem, you're getting the economy of scale of -- across your vendor and the ecosystem. You mentioned ONTs, gateways, fiber, everything. So no doubt that the economics are getting better. We have all reason to believe that they will continue to get better. And that's what we think that economy of scale will help us with.

Batya Levi

analyst
#20

One follow-up on that, Igal. In terms of the incremental 15 million locations that you will build to, can you give us a sense of maybe what percent of those would be extending the current U-verse footprint? And how much of it will be greenfield edge-outs?

Igal Elbaz

executive
#21

This is a great question. And again, we didn't share publicly what's going to be the ratio. But the way to think about this is that the good portion of what we're going to build is over our already existing VDSL infrastructure or you call it brownfield or overbuild. And when you look at this, you're seeing a lot of pockets of whether we either did a deal or the economic in the past were not good enough or we underperformed in those areas. So there's a lot of opportunities around coming in and now filling those gaps that we have in our previous build and making sure that we rise on our existing infrastructure to make it efficient and fast and getting it quickly into our customer location. So you will see this as the majority of what we're going to do. At the same time, we're absolutely going to get into some greenfield areas. From what we're seeing so far, we are seeing positive trends when we're getting into greenfield areas in terms of customer demand and adoption. And that will be really dependent on -- we're getting into -- we'll do our analysis if it makes sense. And based on the success of the build and the customer adoption, we'll continue to understand and analyze what's the right ratio between brownfield, overbuild and greenfield.

John Hodulik

analyst
#22

I was going to pivot a little bit toward that, staying with sort of the residential connectivity. We hear a lot about fixed wireless, I think, from other wireless carriers. And I think John Stankey on either a conference or on a call sounded a little bit more constructive on it. Can you talk a little bit what are the pros and cons of fixed wireless versus fiber connectivity? And what -- where do the use cases make sense for AT&T?

Igal Elbaz

executive
#23

Sure. I'm not sure this is a pros-and-cons conversation. I think it's probably what you're going to see is -- at least with us, we're going to use both our assets, fiber and wireless, to serve demand. And if you -- I started to allude to that in my comments on fiber in terms of the demand. Let me add a little bit color to this. So I talked about the fact that we're seeing a higher pace of data consumption growth in fixed over wireless. We talked about uplink versus downlink. I can tell you that if now the ratio is 10:1, we can see that in 4, 5 years from now, that's going to go down to 5:1 or even lower than that. We can see some of our customers -- if the trend continues in the next 4, 5 years, you're going to see some of our customers consuming about 4 terabytes of data a month. The number of devices that you have at home like if it's now, I don't know what, in the dozen, we are seeing this going to over 30 over time. And this is just in the use cases that we know, right? People are now moving from HD to 4K and the voice assistant. And there might be gamers and studying. But over time, 4K will become 8K. You're going to see AR-based education. You're going to see robots assisting -- companion for elderly. So the amount of innovation that can show up in the home is huge. And for all of those, we just don't believe that a wireless-only system can address all of that demand and demand -- and traffic balance. And this is why we keep iterating our very clear strategy, which is a hybrid fixed and wireless network approach because that allows us now to take advantage of all of our assets, whether it's C-band, our other spectrum position, our fiber build on one side and on the other side, understanding that different customers may have different needs. They may have different speed requests or data consumption needs for services they need. And they might be in different locations. And it may make sense for us to lay fiber to that location because that will be always the best solution to address what I just mentioned. And if not, then we can always offer those fixed wireless solution, getting out of the DSL infrastructure, our low-speed DSL, fixed wireless in places where we can get with fiber. It's a great catch product because it can give you the right speed to that -- that is better than even the DSL. And to be honest, John, we know how to do that. It's not new to us. We are doing fixed wireless for a while, all of our CAF -- not all, but part of our CAF II offering is fixed on -- based on fixed wireless, including CBRS. On our enterprise side, we just launched 5G fixed wireless solution. And for an enterprise, that is -- it's a great outcome because some of our major locations might require a fiber connectivity. And some of the remote location might -- fixed wireless can be good enough. But as long as you can put all of the security and capabilities on top of this to serve an enterprise, that altogether comes -- is a really nice solution. So again, fixed wireless has its own place in the overall way of how to serve customers. That's going to our power play. But we really think that whenever you can come with a fiber to a customer, that's always better. But a hybrid approach probably is the right way to go and address that.

Batya Levi

analyst
#24

I have one follow-up on that. I -- we've been tracking how many macro towers you have and how many small cells you've been adding. And I think in the last few quarters, you ramped up the number of small cells that you have in the network. Can you talk a little bit about what that supports and how you think about small cell coverage beyond here?

Igal Elbaz

executive
#25

The purpose of small cell is to create better densification of the network in areas where you may have some challenges with your macro grid . It's also good in certain areas to get better coverage into buildings. So you're absolutely going to see us continuing building into what we call CRAN or into a small cell. Some of our millimeter wave is coming on top of our CRAN build. So we are seeing a lot of capabilities and advantages that comes with that. And you're going to see us continue to densify our network and putting all of our spectrum to work to get better coverage and better penetration into buildings and providing the right service to our customer.

Batya Levi

analyst
#26

Okay. And maybe with all of the focus coming from stimulus money to build broadband wireless or fixed broadband, how do you envision participating in that infrastructure fund availability? You didn't participate in the last RDOF auction. And do you think that that's an opportunity and versus maybe the way -- it looks like the government is willing to allocate that money is to the ones that can promise the highest performance at the lowest cost per bid. And how do you envision AT&T being sort of [indiscernible] versus cable or some of the fixed wireless companies that are also up for that -- those funds?

Igal Elbaz

executive
#27

Yes. So first of all, AT&T is committed to help close the digital device, both from an affordability and ability perspective. There's already a lot of things that we are doing both on our own as well as making our customers eligible to support that the government is providing, such as the emergency and broadband bid. At the same time, we want to make sure that our voice is heard in DC in terms of how this old infrastructure business is going to look like at the end, how it's going to shape up. We want to make sure that we bring our experience and know-how and knowledge on how to build networks into the conversation. And I can tell you that -- it's still early innings in that process. But I can tell you that the administration is open for discussion. And we are having those conversations about how this is going to look like in the end. We're also having conversation with the FCC and how to approach that. I can tell you that the initiative of the FCC now to have a better understanding of the precision of the locations, what exactly has to be served, where are they, it's really important. I think you mentioned RDOF. Part of us not participating in RDOF was that the rules was not clear or clear enough for us to understand how we can be participating successfully in it. So -- and again, I think there's a lot of conversation now about what's going to be the right subsidy model, what's going to be the right -- you mentioned what's going to be the right speed deals or if it's going to be technology agnostic or it's going to be fixed or wireless and what are the capabilities of the solution. So there's a lot of conversation in how the consumer can enjoy the subsidy of the plans. So there's a lot of work here to be done. And again, we are participating in those conversations as we want to make sure that this will end up to be an efficient. Then I can tell you the good news is that all of the guidance that we've provided in terms of our [indiscernible] business doesn't include any of this. So that can be a real icing on the cake if the right headways get there. I can tell you that at the same times, we are on our own. We just announced that we're going to invest another $2 billion to close the digital divide. This is on top of the $1 billion that -- previously invested. So this is -- the new $2 billion is for the next 3 years. Part of this is going to be continuing affordable broadband offers that we have out there as well as allowing our customers to use EBB. We are building a digital learning platform with WarnerMedia. And we've committed to open connected learning center in unserved communities, again, to make sure that we are continuing to participate in closing the digital divide.

John Hodulik

analyst
#28

Yes. The -- another topic here. DISH made some real headlines with its wide-ranging agreement with AWS to outsource a significant portion of its network. Just yesterday, I think Bell, up in Canada, also announced a deal with AWS. It doesn't sound quite as extensive a deal. But if you look at that sort of cloud-based approach and sort of the O-RAN technology that DISH will be using, first of all, how does it differ from AT&T's approach? And is there any way to sort of size the cost benefits you get as a wireless operator to move into a cloud-based infrastructure or even O-RAN?

Igal Elbaz

executive
#29

Yes. So that can be a fairly long answer because we brought all kind of things together here. I'll try to organize the answer here. So let's start maybe with O-RAN or the Open-RAN. And let me start by saying that AT&T will deploy O-RAN-based architecture over time as it becomes something open overnight. And as it become better and mature, we have all intention to take advantage of that architecture. Now when we talk about Open-RAN, typically, when we talk about the architecture, we are talking about the Open-RAN lines. This is where all of the framework of the specification is happening. Just to remind everyone, in 2018, AT&T was part of the 5 founding members. Put forward today, there's more than 230 participants. And again, we're using virtualization and openness interchangeably. Sometimes they come together but not necessarily. From a technology perspective, they're interchangeable. And there's a lot of advantages that come with an Open-RAN architecture. Let me try to explain a few of them. First, in terms of TCO. You asked about the cost and why you can imagine in differences in cost. So if you think about wireless systems today, they're fairly integrated and close. And there's very small number of vendors participating in that ecosystem. Now to their credit, they built over time incredibly well systems. We're all using them. However, we're still having a really limited number of vendors. What the Open-RAN architecture is doing is opening up that closed ecosystem. We -- there are specifying interfaces between the different subcomponents of the wireless system, things that 3GPP doesn't -- creating interoperability, data models, all of the things that allow a much easier connection between different parts of the wireless system. Now what does -- it does is lowering the barrier to entry into that space because now a new entrant that can bring agility and innovation can say, "I do not have to go and build a full integrated solution. I can go and focus on that subsystem." And there's a mechanism that can allow the integration of different subsystems into the wireless system. So that by itself can help with the capital side. On the open side, for the open side, I'll give you another example. Many of us are using more than one vendor in our network. Each one of our vendors comes with its own management system. What if we can now use the openness and the open interfaces and the new specification to allow us to have even a cloud-based management system that no matter how many vendors you have, all can integrate to one. And on top of this, you can build machine learning and AI that can add to your automation and create a lot of efficiency into your operating model. So that's one side. The other side of this is that there's a lot of efficiency that comes with this O-RAN architecture. Listen, all of us, all operators, as I said, we use the same vendors. However, we have different spectrum position. We have different device mix. We have different customer requirements. Our ability to fine-tune our systems to the tune of our customers is fairly limited when you have fully closed integrated systems. The fact that we're going to be open will allow us to fine-tune the network with additional machine learning and AI to serve customers better. Now you mentioned that we keep talking about -- when we talk about 5G, we keep mentioning speed and reliability and massive IoT. But you mentioned a couple of really interesting points. [indiscernible] it's a huge transition. It is software-based. It is virtual. It's much more disaggregated. And that it brings with it, in sizing with this, improved provisioning. There is network APIs that are building the system that you can expose. And now you can start thinking about taking all of all those capabilities and distribute them out there into the edge, into this distributed infrastructure. Now you mentioned one of the cloud providers. They're looking at this and seeing the same thing. 5G comes with a promise of a lot of immersive use cases. A lot of them will require this low latency and our reliability and being close to the customer. So they're thinking, how can we distribute our infrastructure to become closer to the customer? Now what you're seeing with this 5G story is that convergence of compute, storage and networking. All of a sudden, those industries are becoming much more complementary than anything else because we want to be close, we want to put our network elements much closer to the network. The architectures allow us to do that. Whether it's the core, whether it's the rent, all is moving into the same cloud-native architecture. That infrastructure is moving out. So many of us will just look out and say, "Okay. What is the right way to go and build that? What is the right way?" Whether to run your infrastructure on the public cloud or not, that complementary of bringing them together even for the fact to serve immersive use cases like AR or driverless cars or drones or gaming, by itself, allows us to be much more complementary and become much closer together to serve our customers because without that, without that proximity, you won't be able to offload the capabilities from the device. And you won't be able to offer the right latency that supports all of those immersive use cases. So I know it was a little bit of a long answer. So bottom line, we are -- we'll be engaged with an Open-RAN architecture. As I said, it's not going to get over time. And by the way, there's a belief out there Open-RAN architecture is only good for greenfield. And let me tell you that the answer is absolutely not. By design, the O-RAN architecture is designed to have good detail availability between incumbents into new vendors. And because of the nature of how it's going to work, different part of the architecture mature in different times. And each one of us can decide which part of this we want to adopt. And to be honest, we know how to build networks. This is what we've been doing for many years. We move from 1G to 2G to 3G and now to 5G. So we know how to introduce new capabilities and new technologies into the network. So as you can see, I -- this is the part that really get me excited about what we're doing in 5G. I think, again, there's a lot of what I described about this. But these additional capabilities that come that completely change the architecture and the way we're going to operate this, what's going to be our cost structure is really exciting. And the fact that we can participate in that mobile economy that's going to develop, this new mobile economy that's going to develop, where these new immersive experiences and capabilities and our ability to participate, for all the reasons I just mentioned, it's really exciting.

John Hodulik

analyst
#30

Awesome. Well, Igal, that's a great place to leave it. Thank you very much for your time today. And we hope to see you back again here next year, hopefully in person.

Igal Elbaz

executive
#31

John, thank you so much for having me.

Batya Levi

analyst
#32

Thank you.

John Hodulik

analyst
#33

Okay. Take care, everyone.

Igal Elbaz

executive
#34

Thank you, Batya and John.

Batya Levi

analyst
#35

Thank you.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete AT&T Inc. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to AT&T Inc. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.