BCE Inc. (BCE) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
May 22, 2024
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Sebastiano Petti
analystHi, good morning. I'm Sebastiano Petti, and I cover the Canadian communications space here at JPMorgan. I'm joined by Curtis Millen, CFO of Bell Canada. Curtis, thanks for joining us.
Curtis Millen
executiveGood morning. Thanks for having me.
Sebastiano Petti
analystYou've been in the CFO seat since September 2023, but with BCE for over 15 years. Perhaps start by updating us on the near-term priorities for BCE as you navigate this more competitive industry backdrop.
Curtis Millen
executiveYes. It's interesting because the old strategy is a bit of a new strategy. It's -- we've been on a fiber build-out strategy here for 12, 13 years. Kind of a similar time to when the American telcos started building out fiber. We just happen to continue that journey all the way through. So I do think fiber is our best strategic asset, and it will continue to be our best growth asset. Ultimately, plan to at the end of 2025, hit 8.3 million fiber homes pass, and that's in that 80% range of our total footprint, total fiber plan, which is quite a big development. Obviously, there have been a couple of developments in the Canadian telco cable landscape. But one of the big ones is that we now have enough fiber that we're competitive. I mean, let's say you said, I know I drink the blue cool aid, but where we have fiber broadband, we win. That's what happens in the marketplace. That's why we have net adds and a little bit different than the U.S. market. We're a much more bundled world up in Canada. So having access for us, for our consumers and customers to get access to our fiber network, which still has an advantage in a moment in time. Hopefully, it's a long moment in time. So that's driving growth for us, and it's driving bundled opportunities for us, which just reduces churn. So the big story for us, again, is monetizing the fiber footprint that we've built out over the last 13 years.
Sebastiano Petti
analystAnd so what do you see as the biggest opportunity? Is it just continued sell-in of the fiber as you look out over the next maybe 12, 24 months?
Curtis Millen
executiveYes, I'd say a few things. I do think that's the opportunity. I mean ultimately, we have 1.5 million new fiber locations in the last 2 years. We certainly don't have 1.5 million subs in those fiber footprint. So it is a bit of a ramp-up. It takes 2, 3 years to ramp up and get to I mean I wouldn't say equilibrium because I think we're still pulling incremental share where we have that even after a couple of years, but I mean, there is a ramp-up. So even if we stopped our program today, which we're not, we still have more growth on fiber. And then ultimately, it's pull-through, right, in a world of customers, right? I mean, the way I think about it as a customer is you just want your stuff to work, right, whether it's wireline, whether it's Wi-Fi, whether it's wireless, you just want your stuff to work, right? My 9-year-old, he just wants this stuff to work. And if it doesn't work, he's unhappy about it. So I do find the high broadband -- broadband usage in the home, seems to be the most important driver of customer behavior and customer buying decisions which is a little bit different than 10 years ago where we all thought you'd sell Internet separately from wireless. It does seem to be heading down the bundle path more and more, especially in Canada. And that's where, given our fiber footprint and our wireline coverage, it drives an advantage for us. So I think then just the rest of the growth question. I think there are two other venues there, well, three other venues. One, we're just going to keep ripping out costs. It won't be as dramatic as announcing nearly 5,000 head count reduction, 10% of our workforce, but the ability to leverage technology and it's not just us. I mean, everyone else is going through the same kind of workflow automation, digital automation, which is a BBM sales opportunity for us, but just internally, ripping out these costs and being more efficient, it's better for the customers, especially as you push more online digital transactions, but it's just more efficient for us. So leverage digital, leverage technology, leverage the fiber footprint, which is just more cost efficient for us, and it winds up driving cost savings and better customer service. So that, I think, is just a trend that's going to continue for us as well.
Sebastiano Petti
analystYes. So maybe real quick because convergence has been a quick -- has been a topic for sure this week at the conference. But -- so we have some U.S. guys that are maybe converged 15%, 20% if you look at Verizon, I think that's kind of the number they've thrown out, little bit of debate on where convergence goes in the U.S. and so AT&T is something that they're a little bit more focused on perhaps than peers. Maybe we have Verizon at 15%, European level, 60% to 70%, maybe -- where do you think the Canadian market falls in that spectrum in terms of the number of, I guess, bundled -- converged bundled subscribers across the Canadian landscape?
Curtis Millen
executiveYes. I'd say we're going to be in between. Again, we've diverged strategies U.S. versus Canada, right? I mean the U.S. started building fiber in U-verse back in the day. And we started that journey out in the Atlantic. We just continue that journey. right? I mean, it does take time to build out over 8 million fiber locations. It's going to take time, but there's a reason why our cable competitors are building a fiber in new builds, right? It's not because -- they don't think DOCSIS 3 is good. They just think fiber is better. So they're building it out. And again, it's a different market. Our telco brother in out West, they've built out fiber. We've built out fiber and honestly, it's a game changer. It's such a cliche, but for us, it completely changes the way we can go to market. It completely changes the way that we can sell, and it changes the way that we think about the household as opposed to products. right? And I think it's a subtle shift, but it's an important shift in mentality, and you've kind of seen it over the last few years internally, but all of our sales structure is now organized to sell multiple products into the same household as opposed to, okay, let's count how many wireless subs, let's count how many Internet subs. I mean we still do that because it's -- they're useful metrics. But ultimately, it's -- how many customers do you have, how much revenue can you generate out of that household.
Sebastiano Petti
analystAnd we'll definitely come back to some of the fiber strategy later on as well. So shifting to wireless. Obviously, competition remains a big topic in the Canadian market. While we did see some pullback in promotional intensity in April, competition remains somewhat elevated versus perhaps typical second quarter seasonality or promotions. Hence, that backdrop, BCE has remained focused on premium loadings. Can you update us on the competitive environment in wireless thus far in 2Q and maybe any other demonstrable changes since you guys reported results?
Curtis Millen
executiveI think more of the same. I think rationality in the industry ebbs and flows a little bit, probably like every other industry and geography. It would be great if everyone was rational all the time. But we report subs. So end of quarter, folks are buying subs. I do think what's different in my mind anyway is -- and again, it ties back to the question you asked about kind of bundled and convergence. Internet churn is lower than wireless churn. Bundled Internet and wireless like the more products you have, lower churn becomes for the customer. But we're also in the world where I feel there's a bit of a bifurcation between wireless subs. They're -- the last 10, 20 give it a number gross adds that you'll pick up in any quarter and for us in any of the other customers. I mean, they're not really going to be long-term bundled subs. And there's no long-term business at a $35 postpaid ARPU. So those subs, 6, 9, 12, 24 months, like they're going to be churning out anyway for whatever the best deal is at the time because they're not focused on quality network, they're focused on solely on price. So I don't think the industry is better off chasing down toward the last 10, 20 incremental loads just to say they got a bunch of loads, but didn't make any money off of it. So we're really trying to stay away from that part, focus on the bundled aspect. But I've given away a lot of discount, just bundled out to capture the churn and to drive our, we would say, main brand, superior product, folks that are going to actually use their products and not just the red tag shopping all the time.
Sebastiano Petti
analystAnd you talked about on the call, I think, or in the press release, talked about expectations for mobile phone ARPU moderating growth or to decline versus moderating growth prior because of some of this competition. So maybe help us think about how should -- we should think about promotional intensity or how the team is thinking about promotional intensity for the balance of the year. And then again, not necessarily chasing these low-end subscribers, but how does the Canadian market, I guess, evolved from this point is maybe some of your competitors out there probably don't necessarily have the same view in terms of pricing.
Curtis Millen
executiveThat's fine. Look, others are -- whether they're being rational or not. We all defined rationality a little bit differently, right? But when you're not competing with the same quality of assets, you've got to pull different levers. So we understand that. And it's not like competition is new. So we'll continue to compete. We'll continue to get our share. I think what's different and I think it's different than in the U.S. also, we're a little less mature in terms of overall handset penetration, 5G handset penetration and new-to-category, new-to-Canada has been a real growth driver for the total industry. And frankly, we've underperformed in that over the last decade. I think you go all the way back to the GSM network. I mean we just didn't have a wireless network 15-odd years ago, I guess just a bit longer than 15 years ago that was compatible with international roaming. So we've been at a disadvantage, but I think we're seeing a bit of momentum now and for us, that's really just a tailwind. We don't have to dominate that market. We just have to be okay. And for us, that's a win. So I do think in the industry, it's a little bit different in that there's actual just headline growth and let's capture our share of the new category and continue bundling, continue growing the rest of our sub base. I think there's growth for everybody.
Sebastiano Petti
analystYes. So you brought up the new-to-Canada market and so the population growth remains robust in Canada. And you are taking more share in the new-to-Canada segment. It hasn't been a strategic focus for yours over the last several years. But on the -- Mirko talked about putting the right building blocks in place to accelerate that share growth. Can you help us think about what those are, maybe timing or realization or milestones from here in if -- when should we maybe expect to see that move the needle a little bit more on the loading side?
Curtis Millen
executiveWell, I hope moving the needle as soon as possible. I think it does take time, though, right? I mean, these are kind of community initiatives, and I think distribution plays a big part of that. And it's local partnerships, local, whether it's dealers or under our banners. It's still -- it's in the community and serving the community. And I do think some of the partnerships with the Dollaramas and Staples, the No-frills, that helps us, right? I mean that really should accelerate. The Air Canada partnership we have, given our eSIMs on planes, that gets a lot of press because it's Air Canada, and it's a bit slasher, but I actually think it's the blocking and tackling of distribution in community in market and frankly, out of country in the home markets before folks move or travel or become students in Canada. So I think distribution is quite a big one, and then ultimately, turning our sales engine to focus on it, right? I mean, not all new to category are the same. They have different credit ratings. Some have fantastic credit. Some are just building up their credit just like the rest of the community. And I think industry-wide, I think we've looked at new to category a bit more monolithic manner, and we're being much more flexible here in terms of how we go after that new segment of customers.
Sebastiano Petti
analystYes. And so the new name -- the no-name mobile partnership is an example. And any update on that? And how meaningful perhaps could that be?
Curtis Millen
executiveWell, A little too early to say. I mean, all signs point to that being quite successful. Strategically, it's certainly on brand. It makes a lot of sense. Now we just need to execute.
Sebastiano Petti
analystSo one dynamic of the wireless market that has been a little bit more of a challenge, perhaps recently and just given your share there has been the business wireless side. And so you're facing macro headwinds as perhaps Canadian enterprises rationalized a bit, but also more competition. So can you help us think what portion of the base business wireless comprise? And qualitatively, can you help us think about maybe the trend in business wireless subscribers over the last maybe a couple of quarters here in year?
Curtis Millen
executiveYes. You're not wrong. Business wireless has been more challenged than consumer wireless. I think, again, our strength is the relationship we have with enterprises in Canada, and it's a bundle of service that we're selling them. So it's -- again, it's priced differently, it sounds different, but ultimately, we have customer relationships, and we want to sell them as much as we can, right, quite simply. And I think what's happening is some of the products put them in legacy bucket or give it another name, right, where there's a bit more negotiating pressure on some of those items while we ramp up kind of the growth services in BBM, right? So the BBM is just our enterprise segment. So if you're talking to customers, is base connectivity the most important thing we're thinking about? Or is it transition to cloud, workflow management, digital transition. And I think the latter is becoming much more important for CIOs and up, frankly. And I do think that's a growth vector for us. I mean you saw that we made an acquisition of a company called FXI, all right? And that's ultimately install ServiceNow and it's -- we've been talking about cloud in the U.S. forever, right? I mean everybody is talking about cloud, but this is the team that will actually transfer your compute entry to cloud and update your processes so that you're not just lifting and shifting to the cloud. I do think there's a bunch of growth there, and then that wraps around the cybersecurity side of it and it wraps around our network. So I do think that bundle is quite compelling. And since the acquisition, we've seen pretty good growth there and a very different type of discussion with our end customers. So ultimately, long way of saying the bundle of services will keep changing over time. I think we do have the capabilities to deliver what our customers are looking for. But again, the overall revenue and EBITDA is what we care about and the product mix is just going to keep changing over time.
Sebastiano Petti
analystYes. So just jumping to business wireline for a second since you touched on it. The decline in legacy revenue, again, continues to be a bit of a headwind. But at the same time, you touched on perhaps the business solutions, services revenue, right? Had a nice organic growth, it's 12% in the quarter. And I think now at a $500 million annualized run rate, I think, was what you guys discussed. So how -- you touched on some of that with cloud security managed automation. Help us think about the growth drivers there? And maybe how some -- maybe double-click on the conversations that you're having about next-gen solutions with some of your enterprise partners and customers?
Curtis Millen
executiveYes. I think that's right. What's interesting, we'll see how it plays out, but it seems like any one of those products can actually pull through the rest, where traditionally, you think, okay, well, it's connectivity and then you can sell through other products in this world where there if the customer is focused on transition to the cloud or workflow automation or whether cybersecurity product, it winds up being a -- again, a bit of a buzzword, but it winds up being a holistic discussion because they all tie together, right? And we have our own IP, but we can also -- we have partnerships with kind of the leads in all of those different avenues, and we can implement it. So whether it's kind of the MSI, the PSI, the product side, enterprises aren't that much different from consumers. You just want it to work. And then if something does go bump in the night, you need a number to call and that group will go out and fix it. So the strength of relationships, the reputational strength will continue to help us keep driving the newer products and newer services and frankly, helping our customers solve problems. I mean, fundamentally, that's what we do. We help our customers solve problems so that they can run their business and not have to worry about the solutions that we bring to bear. So I think it's more of the same, but the conversations are taking place at different levels in the organization now as you start talking about longer-term transition plans and beyond just connectivity, which is a bit more CIO level or even below sometimes.
Sebastiano Petti
analystYes. Okay. So shifting back to the consumer and convergence. So we talked about BCE's long-term fiber to the home or fiber to the premise strategy. And particularly driving increased penetration, which seems to be a focus or Mirko has talked about. So you reported record Internet net adds in 1Q '24 noted, I think, a 39% increase in bundled sales where BCE fiber was available. And so despite the more competitive wireline market, it was the best result since 2007. So help us think about, I guess how sustainable are these trends in the Internet business? And think about perhaps the converged strategy is meant to drive lower mobile churn over time. You kind of talked a little bit about that. When do we perhaps begin to see that converged opportunity and that better CLV kind of start to come through on the wireline side?
Curtis Millen
executiveYes, I think you continue to see it and continue to accelerate. Like all of the metrics, the more products you have with the customer, the lower the churn. And it actually holds -- I mean if you sell 4 products to 5 products, there's actually a churn benefit going from 4 to 5% from 5 to 6. So the churn benefit of products as kind of we're all consumers, if the consumer can just hit the easy button, they do, right? And I do and is kind of human behavior. So that, I think, continues. And again, what's different in the Canadian industry is while others were pulling back their capital spend, our fiber deployment actually accelerated during COVID, right? Again, it wasn't an experiment anybody would want in Canada or the U.S. or globally. But it kind of proved out that as folks are working from home, your teenagers or your spouse or partners working from home also like broadband, like fast broadband in the house is quite important now. I'm not working for a home a day or 2 days a week without fast Internet, right, and fast, reliable Internet. It's just become a much more important product. I think it was always kind of ramping up to be the most important product, but it certainly got accelerated. So what's changed is we win where we have fiber, where we have copper network or fiber to the node, it will be less competitive. Copper honestly, is not competitive. It's a service that provides, but it's not as good as fiber by a long shot. So what happens is we go from 30%, 40% fiber coverage of the cable footprint. Now we're north of 60% heading north 70%. It's a very different world of how we can market, what we can sell and the growth that, that drives. So ultimately, wireless has always been competitive for the last 15 years, but our wireline footprint is now pulling through. So we call it bundle, but ultimately, we went from having an inferior broadband product to a superior broadband product, and now it's time to monetize that network.
Sebastiano Petti
analystYes. And I think maybe a couple of years ago, when Mirko was here at the conference, kind of said you had reached that 60% critical mass. And I think that was kind of a turning point for the business because now, again, you have the superior product bundle offering across the vast majority of your footprint, now you can really begin to lean in. So that's kind of where we are.
Curtis Millen
executiveAnd increased volumes, if -- I mean, it's pretty simple math, the increased volumes in a world where you have 70% kind of fiber footprint 30%. So you win in the 70%, you losing the 30% increased volumes actually helps you a year to the positive, especially with the pull-through. In the world, you go back 5 years, where the equation was inverted we had to be a lot more delicate in terms of our marketing and brand positioning and just overall activity in the market. So I think that's kind of dramatically changed what we can do in market. And honestly, it's why you see us driving market share.
Sebastiano Petti
analystSo against that backdrop of long runway of market share growth, you talked about the 8.3 million passings or locations target by '25, but that's down from 9 million, right? It was where you had originally kind of intended because perhaps some regulatory decisions but does it make sense to go beyond that 8.3 million over time just given all the goodness that we're talking about, but is it maybe again, partly predicated on or dictated rather by policy?
Curtis Millen
executiveLook, I would say fiber is going to make sense, but we can't be blind to the environment in which we're operating, right? So if interest rates bump up? Well that makes -- if there was a fiber build that was kind of borderline economic, well, then that becomes uneconomic because your investment case is a little different. If rig policies change. Well, that has an impact on the business case. So I think there's plenty more fiber locations to build out that will be very good uses of capital. I think the nuance is, do you turn the dial up a little bit, down a little bit and how many new homes are you building out a year. Again, the fact that we accelerated through COVID and we're getting to 8.3 million, 80-odd percent. It affords us a lot more flexibility in and around timing and pace of that build as opposed to, look, these are kind of urban areas need to get it done, table stakes. So I think it affords us a little bit more strategic flexibility, but it's still going to be a good investment.
Sebastiano Petti
analystOkay. That makes sense. And so as we're thinking about a lot of what we discussed, but given competitive pressures, in wireless and wireline. How do we get comfortable? Or how does the team get comfortable in terms of just your overall revenue guidance for 2024? I mean what are some of the levers we should be thinking about in terms of getting there?
Curtis Millen
executiveYes, it's interesting. I mean we're comfortable with our guidance overall. And ultimately, as you say, competitive marketplace, but it's been a competitive marketplace for years, if not decades. And the headline price will always make the news and politicians will do their politician thing and try to get votes and try to get some notoriety. But ultimately, when you look at it, the vast majority of our subs are not on the lowest price plans and overall ARPU basically flat. So -- and that's in a world where bundled subs have been increased, I guess, what gross adds have bundled kind of doubled year-over-year. So that should be an ARPU pressure and you pick up the win in churn later on. But ultimately, with all of those kind of headwinds, ARPU is flat, service revenue up.
Sebastiano Petti
analystOkay. So I think we also talked about on the call here, right, with strong 1Q '24 EBITDA growth, but there's still probably benefits from workforce reductions and restructuring that should build over 2024. Can you help us maybe think about the timing and cadence of the maybe benefits from the '23 program, how we should be thinking of perhaps about then the timing and cadence of the '24 program and what that all means to consolidated EBITDA growth for the year?
Curtis Millen
executiveYes. And that's -- that's a good question. Ultimately, the 150 to 200 range is something we're still comfortable with. Obviously, you ramp into it, Q1 didn't see much of a benefit at all. I mean given the timing of the exits. The program is not quite done yet. So the second half of the year is going to be much more important for us as we grow into that.
Sebastiano Petti
analystOkay. That's a good way to think about it. And then so BCE shares are currently yielding. I don't have the current dividend yield but...
Curtis Millen
executiveWay too high in numbers.
Sebastiano Petti
analystYes, take a number. So reflecting, obviously, some concerns around the payout ratio and leverage profile. So in 1Q, you raised BCE's internal leverage target from -- to 3% from 2% to 2.5%, which you noted was perhaps a stale policy. So frame how you're thinking about your overall payout ratio, leverage, long-term capital return and dividend payouts.
Curtis Millen
executiveOkay. So hold on. You might have to come back with that one because that -- exactly that covers a bunch. In terms of the leverage policy, 3x, I think, is just the appropriate long-term policy here that's well inside. It's a quarter turning inside S&P's BBB+, the old policy from 7 years ago, it was a bit of a different world in terms of our scale wasn't the same. Capital leases weren't included and S&P hadn't moved up their policy. So ultimately -- and sorry, I forgot, I mean I should mention this. That was also at a time when we had a pension deficit. We're now running a $3.5-plus billion surplus, which gets adjusted into rating agency's calculation, but that's -- it's a pretty big difference. So ultimately, as I said, 2.5% is -- really was a stale number. I think 3% is still very solid BBB+ credit policy and ultimately, where we should be long term is my view. And in terms of how you get there, I mean, ultimately, there is a deleveraging path. I mean ultimately, I'm saying ultimately 6x, but ultimately, it's a free cash flow driver, right? I mean drive free cash flow growth and everything else is capital allocation, right? Leverage comes down. It's how we talked about the nuance of pacing of fiber and other digital transformation projects. So within our world here, we're still able to drive fiber growth. We're able to drive customer growth and funding digital transformation as well as investing in the business. So it's a pretty good balance of capital allocation. And as you get forward a few years, obviously, if you slow down some of the subsidy builds, which are a bit more expensive than normal and kind of reap the benefits of our digital transformations and IT investments. I won't go so far as to say what our competitor says we're 10% [ C:I ] is where we'll land, but it's well below where we are now. It's well below where we are now. And that just drives goodness to free cash flow, leverage and everything else.
Sebastiano Petti
analystSo glad you brought up the pension because [ Glenn ] would probably have been calling you had you not brought up that surplus. So...
Curtis Millen
executiveThe good news about that is actually president of a pension fund at the time. So I should say it.
Sebastiano Petti
analystAnd so I think I'll take another bite at the apple here. I think I asked you this on the call, but how should we think about the timing of getting back down to maybe that payout ratio -- the long-term payout ratio for the BCE?
Curtis Millen
executiveNo, it's a fair question. We'll see how consistent my answer is. I do think we're doing what we told the markets we're going to do, right? I mean we're running our payout ratio over 100% through 2025 as we build out our fiber as we build our long-term assets. The other point on leverage is there was a bit of an overhang uncertainty of our 5G spectrum. I mean we've now bought that spectrum. It's behind us. There's millimeter wave, but that's expected to be a relatively smaller track. So in terms of that overhang of risk to leverage and free cash flow, that's now behind us. So I think you get through 2025. You can't just stop your fiber build on a dime. You start normalizing your CapEx again. So you get into 2026. And I've seen -- we've kind of said shortly after 2025, we're looking to get below 100% and then you get into what is a more normalized long-term world for us in terms of dividend payout ratio without getting into it's a board decision, et cetera, et cetera.
Sebastiano Petti
analystOkay. And I think you touched on and I want to go back to, I guess, just some of the longer-term cost initiatives that you and the team have been focused on. Obviously, Mirko has talked about this digitization automation, virtual repairs, but maybe update us also -- so taking a step back, how should we think about these cost initiatives these 2, 3, 5-year time frame kind of initiatives? Or could we perhaps begin to see the fruit of that earlier? And then copper decommissioning, where are we on that journey. I feel like it's maybe perhaps something we don't -- hasn't gotten as much attention, even though it's perhaps obviously something you guys are thinking about.
Curtis Millen
executiveYes. I think copper decom, we might be a little earlier than some of our competitors in that process. So obviously, there's an opportunity, not just because you can sell off copper, and it's very valuable. But just in terms of reducing the number of COs that you have. So it's selling off real estate, it's adjusting your footprint and ultimately reducing the cost and simplifying your kind of network backbone while you sell off copper. So that opportunity is there. I find that one's a little bit more of a step function, so it's a little lumpier, right? I mean you need to get out of the CO by CO by CO. Whereas the rest of the cost initiatives that you rattled off, I think you just see that goodness and you capture it over time, but fairly consistency, right? So there's a project, it lands, you get a benefit. There's another project that rolls off, rolls off, rolls off. So I do think that just continues. And it all flows through from the fiber build combined with our IT systems and our go-to-market and frankly, customer behavior, right? I mean if you go back a handful of years, people -- well, I mean, nobody wanted to sit on hold, but people would want to actually talk to somebody to solve the problem and figure it out. In the chatbot world in the digital self-serve world, customer behavior is going to have a big piece of that. But our ability to keep up with and frankly drive some of that behavior by just making it easy is going to continue to drive those trends, right? So self-install, digital hubs, just connecting with us online and in a fiber world where you don't have gear, especially in Canada, you don't have gear in the field where you have to go repair it. You don't need as many trucks. You don't need as many technicians, boots, helmets on the ground, like we become a much more software developer-type company, right, because it's all software layers on top of the network as opposed to hard hats, pick axes and shovels. So there's some kind of old school legacy cost savings plus the new world digital self-serve type savings.
Sebastiano Petti
analystYes. And obviously, AI plays an opportunity in our customer service. We've heard your peers in North America talk about that this week as well. And so that's probably a huge opportunity. That probably is tied into a lot of this, a lot of the different levers that we've just kind of gone through.
Curtis Millen
executiveYes. I'd say AI is everywhere, and I'm sure the folks in the room knows as much as I do about this. But it's -- it's gone from buzzwords to how do you actually leverage the technology and traditional AI or Gen AI, right? But it's not just in the call center or customer service. I mean, it's legal, it's HR, it's finance, it's really throughout the organization in terms of how do we actually leverage technology to create a better experience for customers and at the same time, become more cost efficient. And on the third-party revenue, you would have seen our kind of partnership announcements. The partnerships that we're announcing here, there are kind of ServiceNow, it's Google for our call center. Those are products that we will leverage internally, but they're also products that we're going to sell externally. So John Watson, our President of Enterprise, it's inside, outside strategy, but we're a pretty good customer for a lot of this technology. And if it drives savings for us, it's going to drive savings for other.
Sebastiano Petti
analystSo lastly here, just shifting to the end of sports assets. One could argue sports franchise valuations are -- I wouldn't necessarily say peak levels but elevated levels here, but BCE does not seem to be getting any credit for its stake in the Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Group, the Canadians. What's the end goal for these assets?
Curtis Millen
executiveYes. I'm sitting in Boston. So the good news for MLSE here is that the value of the team is really skyrocketed somewhat independent of whether or not they can beat the Bruins in the playoffs. So we'll take that as a good news story. Actually, it's been an incredible investment. But you're right. I mean if there's an opportunity to monetize, I think we have to consider that. Ultimately it's a lot of value that's not driving EBITDA, but it comes with real strategic importance for us. So in terms of ability to monetize, we have to take a look at it, especially in this rate environment.
Sebastiano Petti
analystOkay. Well, I think that's a great place to end it. Thank you, everybody. And thank you, Curtis, for joining us.
Curtis Millen
executiveThanks very much for having me. Thank you.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete BCE Inc. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to BCE Inc. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.