Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited (CP) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

October 28, 2026

TSX CA Industrials Ground Transportation earnings 61 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator

operator
#1

Good afternoon, everyone. My name is Bo, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to CPKC's Third Quarter 2026 Conference Call. The slides accompanying today's call are available at investor.cpkcr.com. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to introduce Mr. Chris de Bruyn, Vice President, Capital Markets, Tax and Treasurer. Please go ahead, sir.

Chris de Bruyn

executive
#2

Thank you, Bo. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. Before we begin, I remind you this presentation contains forward-looking information. Actual results may differ. The risks, uncertainties and other factors that could influence actual results are described on Slide 2, in the press release and in the MD&A filed with Canadian and U.S. regulators. This presentation also contains non-GAAP measures outlined on Slide 3. With me here today is Keith Creel, our President and Chief Executive Officer. Nadeem Velani, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; John Brooks, our Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer; and Mark Redd, our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. The formal remarks will be followed by Q&A. In the interest of time, we would appreciate if you limit your questions to one. It is now my pleasure to introduce our President and CEO, Mr. Keith Creel.

Keith Creel

executive
#3

Thanks, Chris, and good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for joining us on the call today. First and foremost, I want to extend. I felt thank you to our 20,000 strong family of railroaders across the 3 countries that produce the results our team [indiscernible] we're discussing today. We're extremely proud of what this team has delivered during this quarter, handling strong growth. bringing the railroad extremely well and continuing to create opportunities across this very unique network. Looking at the quarter on the results side, we delivered third quarter revenues of $4.2 billion, volume growth of 6% and an operating ratio of 61.9% that generated 16% adjusted EPS growth. Against a pretty dynamic backdrop. I'm pleased with what the team has delivered. We handled 6% more volume while continuing to improve the performance of the railroad. And more importantly, there is so much more opportunity in front of us. On the car velocity, train velocity, fuel efficiency terminal fluid all showed strong improvement year-over-year in operations. And this credit belongs to Mark, the senior team and the roads across our network executing our plan every day. Nick Walker, Greg Squires, Jason Ross, Brad Robertson Braden Ted, Tom Ragone continue to provide strong leadership, and I'll tell you we're fortunate to have a deep experience and talented bench of operating leaders across this network. We've invested ahead of growth. We've got the people, the locomotives and the infrastructure aligned with our demand. We're prepared to grow, and we're becoming better rail orders each and every day. Operational excellence is a journey, it's not a destination. There's more opportunity to be mined and rest assured, I'm confident this team will continue to find it. On the commercial side, John and his team continued to convert the reach and the opportunities this network creates in new markets, new products and profitable sustainable growth during the quarter. We established all-time volume records in domestic intermodal, international intermodal and U.S. grains. These outcomes reflect strong service discipline in the market and the unique options this network creates for our customers. We also announced a meaningful expansion of our relationship with Elk Valley resources to move their product from the mines that we serve in Southeastern British Columbia to Vancouver for global export. This expanded agreement reduces complexity, strengthens Indian supply chain and position CPKC and EBR to grow together for years to come. Our Canada, Mexico Landbridge is another powerful proof point, which continues to generate value in the face of uncertainty. When we brought these 2 railroads together just over 3 years ago, this traffic was about $100 million in annual revenue. We expect to exit this year north of $600 million. And this is not growth we inherited. It's growth that we created, taken a challenge and turning that challenge into an opportunity, creating new markets enabled by this unique North American network. And importantly, we delivered 6% volume growth despite headwinds across certain markets during the quarter. That tells you something about the quality and the diversity of our growth opportunities as we remain well on track for another year of mid-single-digit volume growth. It also speaks to the alignment between our operating and commercial teams. The operating team delivers the service. The commercial team takes the service to the marketplace and creates opportunities. They've been doing it consistently since we brought these 2 networks together over 3.5 years ago. So the bottom line, when you combine industry-leading operations, the unique network built for growth and a hungry disciplined commercial team, you create a very compelling outcome. So let me leave you with this. The larger message has not changed. We have a railroad that's running extremely well, a differentiated network, a deep pipeline of growth opportunities that are in front of us. I'm proud of what the team has delivered in this quarter, but rest assured, we are not satisfied. We know there's more work to do and more importantly, opportunity to capture. The team will remain focused on execution taking care of our customers, converting these opportunities into profitable sustainable growth. And with that, I'll turn it over to Mark to walk through the operation, John to give you some color on the markets, and they deem will close it up before our questions elaborating on those numbers. So over to you, Mark.

Mark Redd

executive
#4

Yes. So thank you, Keith, and good afternoon. I want to begin by thanking our railroaders for another strong quarter of execution. Our network is running very well in delivering reliable service for our customers while supporting continued growth across the business. We saw strong improvement across several of our operating metrics, train speed improved 8%, dwell improved 7%, car miles per car day increased 10%, locomotive productivity up 4% and fuel efficiency improved 3%. These results demonstrate the strength of our PSR operating model. Review of the safety results. Our personal injury frequency was 1.12, which is 20% higher than last year. Our train accident improved 60% to 0.46. Where we are pleased with the train accident result, the increase of the person enters does not meet our standard. Safety is a never-ending journey. We will learn from every incident, reduce the fundamentals -- reinforce the fundamentals, stay focused on what matters most. Every railroad are going home safe at each and every ship. Turning to labor. In the U.S., we reached agreements that bring employees from several separate agreements under our Mid-South agreement to simplifies how we operate provides greater flexibility helps us run a more consistent, reliable service for our customers. I'm also pleased to announce that we have 2 new collective agreements with BLET Smart have been ratified on the DMA and [indiscernible] properties. In Canada, CPKC and the IBEW agreed to binding arbitration, ending the strike involving approximately 300 signal and communication employees. Turning to capital. We continue to make disciplined investments in safety, growth and efficiency. We have received 170 of the Tier 4 locomotives from Wabtec. We're starting -- beginning to receive 35 more from Progress Rail. In total, we expect to bring on 300 new locomotives through 2028. We're already seeing benefits in these investments. The newer locomotives have contributed to more than 35% reduction in our service interruptions on our 100 Series trains in Canada, a 10% reduction in interruptions in our Western Canadian fleet, while improving fuel efficiency on both services. We are strengthening the tools of our service design team using the plan and uses the plan and operate the railroad. We recently moved into the new planning platform that gives the team near real-time visibility in the traffic and network conditions, along with the greater control of the data and the models used to build the operating plan. This in-house tool replaces a legacy third-party application. Visibility allows us to evaluate operating scenarios faster, responding to changing traffic patterns sooner refine the plan as conditions change. This is what disciplined PSR execution looks like, better information, quicker decisions and even more tighter alignment between the operating plan, our resources and customer demand. In closing, Brotheway, the railroad is continuing to execute across the network. This railroad is running well. We're beginning -- we're building on that strong foundation with disciplined investments in our people, capacity, equipment and technology. Together with our PSR model, these investments are improving reliability, creating capacity, positioning us to safely handle Johns and then his team's growth. We're never satisfied when we keep controlling what we can control, keep our foot on the gas and continue making this railroad better every day. With that, I'll turn it to John.

John Brooks

executive
#5

All right. Thank you, Mark, and good afternoon. The CPKC team in this unique network produced another record quarter driven by strong operating and commercial execution. We delivered record Q3 freight revenues and RTMs, up 15% and 6%, respectively. Cents per RTM increased 9%, reflecting sustained pricing strength and higher fuel surcharge revenue. Our capacity and reliable service support new business initiatives and share gains, while disciplined pricing remains a core focus. Moving on to the next slide, I want to highlight the consistency of our industry-leading growth. We have delivered consistent RTM growth across our 3 nation network with year-to-date Q3 volumes ex coal, up 17% since the merger. That performance, despite a tough macro backdrop is driven by disciplined commercial execution, self-help initiatives and strategic share gains and our strong service product, network validity and available capacity provide the foundation for this growth. Now taking a closer look at our third quarter revenue performance. I'll speak to the FX adjusted results. Starting with bulk. Q3 was another record quarter for Green with record revenue, RTMs and carloads. Revenue increased 27% on 23% volume growth. Canadian grain volumes increased 35%, driven by a high carryout of stocks following the record harvest, growth into our Mexico market and strong Vancouver exports. U.S. grain volumes increased 13%, driven by strong corn demand in the Mexico and exports through P&W. Now looking ahead, we expect continued grain volume growth through the end of the year and into early 2027, supported by healthy supply and demand fundamentals, combined with our diverse market reach. We are also very encouraged by new crush production coming online in both Canada and the U.S., including our new contract with LDC at Yorkton. Potash revenues were up 8%, on a 7% decline in volume with performance reflecting the impact of Canpotex's Portland terminal maintenance during the quarter. Now looking ahead, export demand fundamentals remain healthy and Portland's maintenance is now completed. We expect a return to solid growth for the remainder of the year. To round out bulk, coal revenue declined 1% and 11% reduction in volume. The decrease continued to reflect production-related challenges at the mines. However, as expected, this volume headwind is continuing to moderate. And more importantly, as Keith mentioned, I'm very excited about our new 5-year contract with EVR. This agreement establishes a strategic long-term partnership for CPKC and EVR, resetting to what good service looks like for our Canadian coal franchise. Now moving on to merchandise. Energy, Chemicals and Plastics revenue increased 9% on flat RTMs. Higher energy prices have shifted some of our commodity flows into shorter-haul domestic and export market, creating a headwind versus our expectations on the quarter. As energy prices moderate over time, we expect those trade flows to normalize. At the same time, I can tell you this team remains laser-focused on controlling what we can control and that's winning new business and pursuing self-help opportunities that only set us up well as we go to 2027. Forest Products revenue increased 9% on a 2% volume growth. We delivered solid and resilient growth in this space, despite softness in housing and cross-border tariffs. Our focus on industrial development opportunity supports growth against the softer macro backdrop. The Metals, Minerals and Consumer Products area revenue increased 13% on 8% volume growth. We continue to deliver growth and record quarterly volumes in steel, aluminum and metal, supported by good demand from industrial production and construction activity. Moving to the automotive area. Revenue increased 5% on a 5% volume decline. While the quarter was significantly impacted by plant retooling and production holds, we remain confident in the long-term growth outlook for our automotive franchise. We have line of sight to return volume growth for the fourth quarter and into 2027, supported by share opportunities and the conversion of short sea traffic to rail. Now closing with Intermodal, revenue increased 21% on a 10% volume growth and all-time record performance. Domestic intermodal volumes increased 7% in the quarter. Growth was supported by strong performance across our Canadian domestic lanes, along with continued strength in our U.S. lanes and Mexico cross-border service. Our SMX product with CSX continues to build momentum with volumes up 30% sequentially. Our service reliability on both our MMX and SMX intermodal products position us well to continue to build trust with our customers and capitalize on favorable truck-to-rail conversion opportunities. In International Intermodal, volumes increased 11%, driven by continued strength in shipments from the Port of Vancouver for Gemini and also CMA. Our capacity at both the port and the inland terminals support reliable service and sustainable profitable growth. We are particularly excited about the recent federal funding announcement for the Port of St. John, including significant investments in the port, water access, warehousing and rail efficiency. This nearly $500 million investment will unlock capacity to handle up to 1 million TEUs capacity and support growth for this premier gateway for years to come. So to close, the growth we are delivering is differentiated and sustainable. It is supported by strong service, disciplined pricing and an expanding pipeline of self-help opportunities that are unlocked by this unique network. We are well positioned for a strong finish to the year, and I remain confident in our ability to carry this momentum into 2027 and beyond. So with that, I'll pass it over to Nadeem.

Nadeem Velani

executive
#6

Okay. Great. Thanks, John, and good afternoon. I'm pleased with the solid results the team delivered this quarter. Strong volume growth, disciplined pricing and continued productivity gains drove 16% growth in core adjusted diluted EPS, despite the margin pressure from higher fuel prices. Now turning to our third quarter on Slide 15. CPKC's reported operating ratio was 64.8%. Our core adjusted OR was 61.9%, up 120 basis points from last year. Diluted earnings per share was $1.04, and core adjusted diluted EPS was $1.28, up 16% versus last year. Taking a closer look at our expenses on Slide 16, I will speak to the year-over-year variances on an FX-adjusted basis. For adjusted comp and benefits expense was $708 million. The year-over-year increase was driven by higher stock-based and incentive compensation, wage inflation and volume-related expense. These increases were partially offset by strong productivity gains, including lower overtime and workforce efficiencies. Looking ahead, we now expect full year head count to be down slightly. This, combined with mid-single-digit volume growth continues to drive strong labor productivity and operating leverage. Fuel expense was up 56% year-over-year, driven by a 53% increase in average fuel price as well as higher volumes. The change in fuel price was 90 basis point headwind to core adjusted OR in the quarter, while providing a modest benefit to earnings. Our continued focus on fuel efficiency supported by our locomotive investments drove a 3% improvement in the quarter and generated $21 million in savings. Materials expense was up 12% year-over-year, driven primarily by higher fuel prices on our non-locomotive fleet. Lower locomotive material costs partially offset the increase. Equipment rents were 9% lower versus prior year as improved networking performance and cycle times more than offset the impact of increased volumes. Depreciation and amortization expense was up 4%, driven by a larger asset base. Core adjusted PS&O expense was $568 million. The year-over-year increase reflected inflation, volume growth and other operating costs, partially offset by lower casualty costs and productivity gains, including lower crew and terminal costs. Overall, I'm pleased with the operating leverage we delivered in the quarter. Volume growth, disciplined pricing and continued productivity improvements drove double-digit earnings growth despite higher fuel prices, creating pressure on the operating ratio. Moving below the line on Slide 17. Net interest expense was $239 million or $235 million excluding purchase accounting. The increase was driven primarily by interest on new debt, partially offset by debt repayment. Income tax expense was $448 million or $369 million adjusted for purchase accounting and significant items. We continue to expect the full year core adjusted effective tax rate of approximately 24.75%. Now turning to Slide 18 and cash flow. Our earnings growth continues to translate into strong cash generation. Year-to-date, net cash provided by operating activities is up 12%, while adjusted free cash flow increased 59% to $2.4 billion. Year-to-date capital expenditures were $2 billion, down 12% from last year, and we remain on track to deliver full year CapEx of approximately $2.65 billion, a 15% reduction versus last year. Our targeted investments over the last several years in network capacity and locomotives are delivering tangible benefits as demonstrated by our operating productivity and fuel efficiency performance. Through the first 3 quarters of the year, our disciplined approach to capital management delivered over $4 billion of shareholder returns through share repurchases and dividends, reflecting a balance and opportunistic allocation of capital. Stepping back, I'm pleased with the overall performance in this quarter. We delivered strong earnings growth and cash generation while continuing to improve productivity across the business. As we move into the fourth quarter, we remain focused on execution, and we are very well positioned to deliver on our full year guidance. With that, let me turn it back over to Keith.

Keith Creel

executive
#7

Okay. Thank you, gentlemen. Operator, if you can, let's open it up for questions.

Operator

operator
#8

[Operator Instructions] We'll go first this afternoon to Steve Hansen with Raymond James.

Steven Hansen

analyst
#9

Keith, I'm hoping you can provide a little more color on this New Elk Valley agreement, your additional or higher share of the haulage. And just what kind of growth you might contemplate through the new term? It does sound like service and the root simplicity played a role here. Curious if the investment announcement in the Neptun also play a role recently.

Keith Creel

executive
#10

Yes, thanks, Steve, thank you for the question. Just in context, if you go back to the last contract, I guess, with our competitor, Canadian National. Historically, before that contract, CP originates 100% of this coal and terminated 100% of the coal kind of from the mine to the Tidewater. Now to step or to the North Shore, CNX is our agent as they do for potash that they do for grain. Well, this last contract and back then, I guess, it would have been tech coal, introduced an interchange at Kamloops, which you have 100% of the traffic we originate that some interchange to CN at Canadian National to go to those same locations at Topwater in Vancouver. And I think we all understand every time you introduce a handoff and/or interchange you create complexity and an opportunity for introducing supply chain cost indoor, compromising reliability. And I would suggest, over the period of that contract, that has happened in small or large part to a point that in our negotiations, that became a topical point. So what's happening now is about half of the traffic that today and our changes to our competitor at Kamloops to go to the North Shore of Vancouver will be reclaimed back to CP origin to destination and the interchange can lots would be eliminated for that traffic. So about 1.5 trains will flip back to CPs route cradle to Gray.

Operator

operator
#11

We'll go next now to you, Brian Ossenbeck with JPMorgan.

Brian Ossenbeck

analyst
#12

Maybe just a big picture question for John. Just how you're thinking about the pricing opportunity going forward and balancing that with volume growth and of course, network resources. I would assume there's some inflation you're expecting to cover, but in terms of just the broader truckload market and all the support that we would see from the market itself. Should we expect something a little bit better than usual when we think about just kind of the run rate, maybe the mid-single digits? And of course, probably an impact from the Canadian green being lagged with the fuel surcharge. So I would appreciate some comments on that.

John Brooks

executive
#13

Yes. So Brian, you know what, I'm bullish on the pricing outlook. We've got it's been a pretty good run. And I think you've seen our commercial team be extremely disciplined in the marketplace. That's not going to change. I'd just be candid. Renewals continue to be that 3% to 4% or even more in some cases. So I don't see that changing. We're going to stay aggressive on that front. Obviously, fuel surcharge where it's at in the marketplace. Canada has introduced another dynamic that we're keeping an eye on and making sure that we're competing in the markets like we need to be. But I continue to have a pretty favorable outlook to close out this year. Most of our book is already pretty much renewed. But I got a favorable outlook as we look into the beginning of 2027.

Operator

operator
#14

We'll go next now to Fadi Chamoun with BMO Capital Markets.

Fadi Chamoun

analyst
#15

Yes. You talked about the deep pipeline and growth going forward. I was hoping you can elaborate on kind of what verticals, what do you see share with us some thoughts on where these opportunities are as you go kind of over the next 12, 24 months? And any kind of high-level idea on how to think about RTM growth in 2027 given kind of the pipeline and now you have a bit of a visibility into the grain and the cold story, I guess, for mid to next year from an LTM growth next year?

John Brooks

executive
#16

I don't think they're going to let me quite guide to '27 yet, but I will give you some color. Certainly, we've had a really good bulk year this year. So those compares are going to be tougher as you look at 2027. But I'll tell you, I'm still pretty bullish that we have not run out all the opportunity specific to this green franchise, we continue to uncover more and more opportunities into the southern part of our network and growth in New Mexico and driving efficiency there. So despite what I do see is tougher comps in that space, I'm convinced we have some upside in there. This crush market and the development of that business, not only in Canada, but also in the U.S. has been pretty good. It really diversifies our grain business. And those crushers got to crush 365 days a year. They're a production facility. So that's really good business. And I think that's an area that you should look to as some upside. Keith mentioned the land bridge earlier. There's -- I spent here in the last few weeks in Mexico meeting with customers and that that area only continues to build momentum. And that's just -- that's both carload type business and steel products and pay products, but it's intermodal opportunities in that, too. So I expect to build on that land bridge. I would suggest to you that we're also in the early innings of this domestic intermodal story. I remain bullish on our team's ability to convert truck opportunities. I've talked about, we've got a hunter group in Mexico that is keenly focused on uncovering those opportunities and converting new customers. And we're working closely with CSX on our SMX product that only provides further upside. And we posted really good international numbers this year on some wins. But between the opportunity and the investment that's going to go in at St. John, there's a lot of upside there. And we continue to see -- albeit singles and doubles, we continue to see growth at Lazaro. And who knows, as you see the canal has had some challenges here on water levels, you could have a potential West Coast U.S. strike with the long shoreman in 2027. We continue to be pretty bullish on Lazaro also in terms of growth. So that's a few nuggets that are out there, let alone some of the other things that we have come down the pipeline.

Keith Creel

executive
#17

Yes, John, if I could add that point about the strike in the West Coast. I think we all understand the complexity of how that might develop. And that's true now that wasn't true the last time is we have [indiscernible] Lazaro into the Houston markets and into the Midwest that shippers did not have a chance or an opportunity to diversify their risk relative to that strike. And I would suggest that will be part of the playbook. And once you get some of that traffic on your railroad, the experience, the service, the experience reliability. It may not all stick, but from a diversification play, we realized our experience to [indiscernible]. And I think that bodes well to our growth aspiration.

Mark Redd

executive
#18

And one comment I'd make is just also just staying in front of John on capacity. I know we are lockstep with different things that he's doing businesses bringing on this railroad, and we certainly got locomotives in place resources in place for crews and certainly better agreements that I spoke about that we can move people around and around the southern part of the U.S. Shreveport area, for sure.

Operator

operator
#19

We'll go next now to Jonathan Chappell with Evercore ISI.

Jonathan Chappell

analyst
#20

John, I know they won't let you talk about the '27 RTMs. But maybe as it relates to the fourth quarter, you're running at about 5.5%. You spoke about a lot of favorable things in your favor right now from auto to potash, et cetera. And then you also should still have some carry out, I would think, from the grain side. So how do you think about momentum for the rest of the quarter, given some of those things that seem to be shifting potentially from headwinds to tailwinds?

John Brooks

executive
#21

Yes. Jonathan, it's gap on. We're going to push it as hard as we can. And I think the -- look, the markets are not perfect. There's ups and downs. We've got some headaches that are out there, but we're going to push it hard. And to your point, as I think about the bulk area today to close out the year, I think it looks pretty good. Domestic Intermodal, our international business, I think, looks pretty good. We've had a little bit of a rough go in the automotive sector here. But we also had the chip issues in that in November, December last year, those compares will turn for us in those months. And I'm super proud of my merchandise team. That's an area that has just been strapped with tariffs and issues and ups and downs. And we -- you've seen in the numbers, we've continued to battle in forest products and in the merchandise sector, to post some pretty good numbers there. So I'm not going to give you a number, but I'm optimistic that we can close pretty strong.

Operator

operator
#22

We're going to go now to Ken Hoexter with Bank of America.

Ken Hoexter

analyst
#23

Great. Maybe I know you've talked a lot about maybe capturing some of the good grain crop or, I guess, continuing it, but I don't think we got your expectation for next year in terms of -- do you expect it to be down 5%, 10% and given the crop or do you make that up? And then maybe just your thoughts on capacity. You talked about buying locomotives and getting them on board. Where do you feel like you are in terms of this mid to upper single digit RTM growth in terms of your ability to sustain that? Or should we expect a rise in CapEx in the '27?

Keith Creel

executive
#24

Ken, I'll let John address the commercial question. When it comes to capacity, I'll just remind everyone, we made a commitment with our transaction to build out this network to handle high single-digit RTM growth. We haven't experienced that yet, but we've invested the capital, the infrastructure is there. We've got the locomotives. We've got the cars. We've got the terminal and the track capacity. We've got a new bridge. We're built forward for growth. There will be no issues without adjusting our capital envelope.

Nadeem Velani

executive
#25

Yes, Ken. I mean we're going to finish the year, as I mentioned, $2.65 billion this year. You might get a modest increase off of that given where the Canadian dollar is, but good side of that, we've guided long term $2.6 billion to $2.8 billion range of CapEx. So you should expect that range.

John Brooks

executive
#26

Yes, Ken, it's no doubt, this is -- we're coming off a record crop. I think the numbers are bouncing around still a little bit. It feels like it's narrowing in on the 76 million to 78 million metric ton area. So would that be down, I don't know, about 8% or so. But -- that being said, I know there's some growing territory in Southern Alberta and Southern Saskatchewan that historically, we've had struggled over the last few years in terms of drought in that, that are actually producing much better results this year. So we're optimistic actually in our growing territory that we in some areas, we might actually be a little ahead of last year. So we'll see what that all produces as we go into the next year. I would say, so far, the customers are signaling sold out demand pretty much through the end of this year. And I think the early outlook in Q1 is they remain fairly bullish. So we'll see how that plays out.

Operator

operator
#27

We'll go next now to Walter Spracklin with RBC Capital Markets.

Walter Spracklin

analyst
#28

Yes. I just wanted to come back to your [ Elk Valley] Resources agreement there and congratulations on that. The question I have really for how we model that now with all the moving parts that we saw this year with the outage at the mine level, and now you're recapturing half of what you lost to CN before. It just makes it really difficult to look out to next year and put a number on what we should look at next year. I know that if we just go back to last year's numbers, you're up, that brings you up 15%, 20%. But now layer on this business, are we looking north of -- are we getting in that 20% range for what you could be up year-over-year in the coal set? Just any kind of given the moving parts there, I really appreciate any guidance you can provide on that particular vertical.

John Brooks

executive
#29

Yes. So Walter, it's a tricky one. There is a lot of moving parts there. I think Elk Valley has been pretty transparent around some of the challenges at the mines. That being said, the performance certainly has been much better, and we're watching it closely as we move through Q4 here. I think if you look at year-over-year, their volumes overall are probably going to end up 15% plus down in terms of tonnage. And oil, it's kind of early in terms of what -- when we have a better handle on what 2027 looks like in terms of their total tonnage output, that will give us a better look. I apologize for skating around it a little bit. But we're -- it's still -- the crystal ball is still a little cloudy on our side. I think the bottom line is we feel really good about where we stand with them in terms of this additional train trains to Neptune. In addition, as you've seen, they've signed a long-term agreement with Westshore, which is right in our wheelhouse, too, and we expect some good growth there. So the combination of the 2, we just got to get nailed down exactly what this tonnage is going to look like for next year.

Operator

operator
#30

We'll go next now to Chris Wetherbee with Wells Fargo.

Christian Wetherbee

analyst
#31

I thought Slide 10 was helpful in terms of putting some perspective on what you guys have been able to accomplish since you closed the deal a few years ago. I guess as you think about where you stand now and the opportunities sort of in front of you, I know it's been a challenging sort of maybe a more challenging macro than you might have expected when you closed the deal, you guys have obviously executed well through this. So do we still think about sort of a 2 to 3-point sort of revenue premium or volume premium for the deal? I don't know if we can talk a little bit about that. And I know the farther we get away from it, the more difficult it is probably to pull these 2 apart. But any big picture perspective, Keith or John, on how you guys are thinking about that as we look out to '27-'28?

John Brooks

executive
#32

I can tell you the expectation in the room is, yes, we're going to beat by 1 to 2 points consistently. And honestly, as much as I'm proud of our success in what we've been able to produce. You said it. It's been in the face of a pretty tough macro environment. And who knows. I've stopped guessing on when that may turn or turn or not turn. But at some point, things will get favorable. I think that gives us a tailwind. And you can rest assured, Chris, that I think you know we're going to continue to push hard. And there's a lot of opportunities that I mentioned earlier that I still think produce or have the opportunity to produce for the next few years sort of an outweighted RTM performance against the industry and peers.

Operator

operator
#33

We'll go next now to Benoit Poirier at Desjardins.

Benoit Poirier

analyst
#34

Yes. Just in terms of nation building project, we've seen quite a lot of positive news flow going forward in terms of energy and mining. We also saw a latest announcement from the Strike Kona resources on crude by rail. So I was just wondering if you could provide maybe John or Keith, an update how we -- you see energy performing going forward? And if you would be able to quantify any potential upside from those nation building projects longer term for CPKC?

John Brooks

executive
#35

Yes, Benoit, as I think about some of those projects, obviously, we're tightly working with major projects office on a number of opportunities that are out there. I think there's pretty good alignment in terms of what some redevelopment could look like in Vancouver and particularly the South Shore as it relates to energy. I think it's a little early to tell. You can probably guess what some of those projects might be. But I think it's a little early to tell on how that plays out. I'll tell you, I mentioned it earlier, and maybe it doesn't fit directly in the energy sector. We're super excited about basically the first project coming out of the trade diversification Corridor fund being all centered on St. John. I think it's a testament to that acquisition that we made a few years back to the short line. It's a testament to the earnings belief in that opportunity in the port in DP World and Haag and Marisa CMA and those steamship lines that have supported that port. I can tell you, it's it's a big part of our growth profile as we looked at, let's say, 2027 to 2030.

Operator

operator
#36

We'll go next now to Brandon Oglenski at Barclays.

Brandon Oglenski

analyst
#37

I apologize in event, everyone on the call because I'm going to be that guy and ask about M&A, Keith, because I think you have filed your responsive requests last month. And obviously, your competitors did that as well. And I know you think this should be rejected on the merits, but can you speak to what was in those requests? And then maybe more specifically on the comments that we heard from closer as well?

Keith Creel

executive
#38

Thanks for the question, Brandon. First, let me say this. CPKC in our initial filing, and you'll see in our subsequent filing, November 18, we're not asking Santa Claus to visit us on Christmas. I can tell you that. We're being very strategic. We're being very pinpointed. We're being very surgical asking for, number one, complete rejection. We don't want a condition. We don't want to concession. We don't think it's needed. We don't think UP needs it. We don't think [indiscernible] needs it in spite of this narrative that the nation needs it to create something that represents that much risk, that much market power forever is completely unneeded in the necessary. Not now and I'd say not ever. That being said, if the STB finds a way to approving their deal, and I think you clearly understand, I don't believe the fact lead to a yes. That being said, what you're going to see in our filing, again, not a Santa Claus list, but protections over gateways that are meaningful that to this point, the applicants, if not offered. Shipper access to protect competitive alternatives to mitigate the market power that's something is colossal as UPNS would create from perhaps an industry like chemical, they would be very, very concerned about that, removing restrictions on remaining independent railroads that hamper their ability to provide competition to UPNS as well, paper barriers, et cetera, et cetera. So again, not a Christmas list, a reality list. We think this whole thing, if you want to talk about Christmas, maybe it looks like a back of coal, this isn't anyone trying to get a get. And since you've asked the question, I think I might as well address and I'm trying to -- and you're probably going to say, I don't believe you, bite my tongue. But quite frankly, the representations that continue to be made in support of UP's ambitions need to be dispelled. There's been quite a few references, and I would say absolutely based on fact, misrepresentations of truth. One, I'll start with is a analogy about if it's good for Canada, it's good for the United States. They've got 2 transcons up there, watch it. We have one in the United States. And I think maybe to quote one of the commenters, one of them doesn't like us to have the same thing here. Well, let's talk about what the same thing is. Scale and size matters, whether you want to admit it or not. In Canada, you put the 2 railroads together, there's 21,000 route miles. If you look at UP's network alone, it's almost double that. You put the 2 networks together, 2.5x that. If you think about the population, think about how capital intensive it is to run a railroad, to maintain a railroad. In Canada, and I think Jim knows this because you came from Canada, there's about 40 million people today, an economy that's set and supports 40 million people. The United States, $350 million Scale matters, California 39 million. So why don't we take that argument to California, I would say you could probably support 2 Class 1 railroads in California. Guess what, there is 2 Class 1 railways in California. So size and scale matters. And then the other very, very critical component. And I would suggest that UP would not want the same. I'm not going to speak for them. I'm just going to assume they wouldn't. And that comes to the regulatory regime that we exist and operate in, in Canada in a world where you have 2 railroads. That connected all the major metropolises across the country. There's something called zone switching, zone interswitching with the prescribed noncapensatory zone switch rate that's clear and transparent to every customer. And if they don't like your rate from point A to point B, they can exercise its own switch and have complete transparency to what the rates are and how they can compete and create their best outcome from a customer's point of view. That doesn't exist in the regulatory regime with the. To get into a rate case where the STB takes a prolonged period of time, takes a lot of money. And quite often, a lot of customers have said, it's not worth what it requires to try to get that outcome. In Canada, FOA you get a decision in 60 days. It's pretty quick, it's pretty swift and it's not consequential when it comes to the money that's on the table, the money that you have to pay to get the outcome that you believe is worth fighting for. That's critically important. You can't ignore that. But to say it's the same, it's not the same. It's completely, completely different. I think some of the other points that are completely different. If you think about the 2 railroads, you think about their aspirations, let's get to this comment about Union Support. 50% of the Union Support, the merger, maybe 50% of the shingles or 50% of the organizations, I haven't gone back and fact check that. But I know for a fact that if you get to the boating udon members, Between those 2 railroads, almost 70% diametrically opposed. That's a misrepresentation. It's simply not true. Now let's talk about this end to end. Well, you know what, CPKC, they're in to end, the SCB looked at their deal, they offered zero concessions, they were zero for them, they're zero for us. Again, I go back to scale and market power. We were the 2 smallest railroads coming together to still remain the smallest rail network in Class 1 rail network in North America. We haven't created any concentrated market power. And when it comes to enhancing competition, even to the new rules, we were truly end-to-end. There were zero overlap. We didn't need anyone to come in to solve an overlap problem. We were hand to go up in Kansas City. We were additive to customer options, not dilutive in any way. So it's not to the same. But the misrepresented is if it is, I think it's insulting. It's just not true. The single line service point, that's one where I agree. I'm an advocate. I said this from the beginning. There are definite benefits of single-line service and eliminating handoffs. I just spoke of one a few minutes ago that can lose. But it can't be at all cost. And contrary to some of the representations, not all shippers have 10,000 cars that when you benefit through single-line service in terms of those assets and allow them to reduce their capital cost, yes, that's true. But what about the smaller shippers that are out there in the world, which far outnumber those 10,000 car shippers that own those assets. So again, single-line benefit is true. I'm an advocate for it, but not at all cost. Not if you create something so large with so much scale and reach that creates so much market power that it takes customer options away. So again, I think the truth matters. And I think making proper representations matter. And I think in the end, this regulatory body, from my experience, wants to hear the truth. And that's the final point I'm going to make. This process in and of itself, to me, has been compromised, but the way these advocates have behaved. We've heard about it, rumor injection, secondhand comments about being said, if you're not forced, you're against us, don't be at the wrong side of the history. Remember, [indiscernible] purchase, don't side with the losers. I got a whole list because guess what, my phone rings and people tell me when they get Brent customers share that. And then I read a letter using other railroads of being the ones that threat. And we're not corollat's like calling the kettle black. Let's be honest about this. And that's what this dispute is that you've read about last week that the judge rule on Friday that this video that the applicants have set as proprietary and confidential and has trade secrets or whatever the representations were that was recorded at a worst conference with over 900 participants. Number one, really. And number two, just share what was said, let people make their own opinions about whether or not they were or not trend if they weren't in support of this transaction, that should it not get approved just because they didn't support the rates are getting rate to teach them a lesson. So that's why we want the video to be public. It's not confidential. It was said in a public domain, and I believe it was said with intent to chill the room. I'm kidding, but not kidding. And to me, in the context of a merger that will change the landscape of this industry forever and put this country an undeniable risk from an operational standpoint in a market power standpoint, this isn't a place to be kidding. Some of these customers that I guarantee you the STB wants to understand their concerns, the fors and the against. That's their livelihood. So to suggest you're kidding in a venue like that, I don't think you just weigh that off and ignore that. At a minimum, it's reckless and its irresponsible. And it's wrong. That's akin to me. We'd like to make, the applicants I'd like to make a lot of airline representations in their analogy of why this merger is necessary. So let's go to the airline industry. What if any of us were to go into an airport and made a joke and said, there's a bomb. I think that would be shocking. And once the dust has settled, even if we said we were kidding before they took us away and hank us and put us in jail, rest assured there's no way that you can assure that someone, what are those customers feel comfortable getting on that plane or getting on that train. How do you then crack that in? I don't know how you do. I really don't. So to me, this process is compromised. And again, the STB, ultimately, they're the regulator, they're the ones that have to make the decision, but I believe that the applicants have put them in a quandary. How will they ever know they're about to make a forever decision that all the 4s and against have been properly represented. And when there has been a chill rest assured people out there, there are customers out there, and I know there's at least 1 or 2 that's spoken directly to me, and I would suggest there's a whole lot more than that, that have not had the courage to speak nor will they speak because they're afraid the mortality it against. So again, not a joking matter, I believe the STB has been backed into a corner. I think the applicants have placed them at a quandary. So I'm not 99.999 certain of what they might decide, but I'm 100% certain. They've got a top road ahead of them to try to assess facts an application that I would argue is incomplete because of the applicant's behavior.

Operator

operator
#39

We'll go next now to Scott Group with Wolfe Research.

Scott Group

analyst
#40

I guess after that, maybe I'll do a near-term ratio question. any thoughts or color on how to think about margin in Q4? And then just one more on tech, if I can. Like if our notes are right from 5 or 6 years ago, this was like a ballpark like $100 million, $150 million revenue loss for you? Like is that the right way to think about getting about half of that back? Is that fair?

Nadeem Velani

executive
#41

Yes, that's a fair ballpark Scott, obviously, depending on what VR's volume is for next year, that's going to have a play a role, but you're in the ballpark. And I appreciate the OR question, Scott, first time I appreciate it. But I'd say that we -- when you think about Q4 last year, it was a different environment as far as fuel prices and so forth. So we'll have a bit of a headwind year-over-year with fuel. But the way volumes are -- started out, October as being extremely strong. So if we saw fuel prices hurt us a little bit, just as far as the timing of fuel surcharge and also some crack spread pricing that impacted fuel prices. I'm sure your models fuel price impact on us a little bit less than our results came in. So I think that's where there's been a bit of a gap. Now if things turn and we start seeing diesel prices, spot prices improve. Certainly, we'll see a benefit of it -- from it. The bottom line is you'll very comfortable, we'll have a sub-60 OR in Q4 given the volume environment given Mark mentioned how the network is running. We should have a decent weather environment in north of the border in Q4. So far, it's been good. And so that always plays a role, but I feel very good about our ability to have -- finish the year strong and have a sub-60 OR.

Operator

operator
#42

We'll go next now to Konark Gupta with Scotiabank.

Konark Gupta

analyst
#43

Just can you frame expectations around sensor as it relates to the fuel impact. And then broadly, for you, John, maybe similarly, are you seeing any dislocations in your price-sensitive markets due to fuel or fuel driven inflation?

John Brooks

executive
#44

Konark, just so I understand, saying sensitive markets relative to the somewhat extreme fuel surcharge inflation that we're seeing.

Konark Gupta

analyst
#45

Yes. I mean, you completed [indiscernible] in some more kits and also there is some price sensitivity in some pockets in your end markets.

John Brooks

executive
#46

Yes. Yes. No. I think I mentioned it earlier. We are seeing it in certain areas and whether it just be different in mechanisms across the rail industry as a whole, different in how mechanisms roll on, roll off against our truck competitors and frankly, all modes of transportation. It is a pretty significant piece of revenue that's on there right now. And frankly, I'll tell you, customers are looking month-to-month, I think in some instances, on how to shift and how to manage that or looking at other market alternatives in terms of how to -- they might be able to get goods. So I do believe that is a real issue that I think we're all facing right now as we as we manage some of these markets.

Nadeem Velani

executive
#47

Konark, I assume year-over-year sense for RTM kind of high single-digit increase year-over-year. So RTMs as yesterday, are up a little over 6%, high single-digit part improvement year-over-year, you get pretty significant revenue growth. That's how we're tracking so far.

Operator

operator
#48

And ladies and gentlemen, that's all the time we have for questions this afternoon. Mr. Creel, I'd like to turn things back to you, sir, for any closing comments.

Keith Creel

executive
#49

Okay. Once again, thanks for your time this afternoon. I hope you take away from this call that this company is enjoying some strong operating momentum, Mark. Thank you the team for that. As long as we continue to operate safely and efficiently against this backdrop of overall favorable demand environment, you can expect us to close this year strong and carry that momentum into 2027. We look forward to talking to you and sharing our results on the next call. Happy holidays, Happy Thanksgiving and Merry Christmas for our U.S. colleagues. Elise Navidad for our Mexican colleagues. Merry Christmas, of course, for our Canadian as well. Thank you.

Operator

operator
#50

Thank you very much, Mr. Creel. Again, ladies and gentlemen, this brings us to the end of today's meeting. We appreciate your time and participation. You may now disconnect.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited transcript — plus 257,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited earnings transcripts and 257,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.

More tools for stock research

OptionsBell: an unusual options activity scanner that tracks options flow across all US stocks and emails you when large trades appear in Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited or any ticker on your watchlist.

StockMarketScan: a stock screener with alerts: 24 pre-built screens refreshed every 5 minutes, watchlists and email notifications. Both offer API and MCP access and fair monthly pricing.