Citigroup Inc. (C) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

June 9, 2026

NYSE US Financials Banks conference_presentation 36 min

What were the key takeaways from Citigroup Inc.'s June 9, 2026 earnings call?

In Q2 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a strong performance driven by mid-teens growth in investment banking fees and high single to low double-digit growth in market revenues. Total revenue for the quarter was not explicitly stated, but management expressed confidence in achieving a net interest income (NII) growth of 5% to 6% for the fiscal year, supported by solid client engagement and loan growth. Earnings guidance remains unchanged, with a target return on tangible common equity (ROTCE) of 10% to 11%.

What topics did Citigroup Inc. cover?

  • Investment Banking Growth: Citigroup experienced a mid-teens year-on-year growth in investment banking fees, driven by increased equity activity and IPOs. Management noted, "what we're seeing for the quarter is something along the lines of a mid-teens level of year-on-year growth."
  • Market Revenue Performance: Market revenues grew at a high single to low double-digit rate, reflecting strength in equities and fixed income. Management stated, "we're seeing in terms of revenue growth, high single digits to low double-digit revenue growth for the quarter."
  • Net Interest Income Guidance: Management reiterated guidance for net interest income growth of 5% to 6% for 2026, citing strong client-driven engagement. They expressed confidence, stating, "we are confident in that 5 to 6 that we will be able to deliver that guidance."
  • Cost of Credit Expectations: Cost of credit is expected to remain stable, aligning with Q1 levels. Management indicated, "we're expecting to be more or less in the range that we were in Q1," suggesting a controlled risk environment.
  • Efficiency Ratio Target: Citigroup aims to achieve an efficiency ratio of around 60% for 2026, with management confident in meeting this target. They noted, "we expect to repeat this year with another 300 basis points of improvement or thereabouts at around 60%."

What were Citigroup Inc.'s June 9, 2026 results?

  • Investment Banking Fees Growth: mid-teens (year-on-year growth driven by equity activity)
  • Market Revenue Growth: high single to low double digits (reflecting strong performance in equities and fixed income)
  • Net Interest Income Growth Guidance: 5% to 6% (maintained guidance for 2026)
  • Efficiency Ratio Target: around 60% (expected improvement from 63% last year)
  • DTA Utilization Guidance: $800 million (for 2026 based on U.S. profitability)
  • ROTCE Guidance: 10% to 11% (for 2026)

Citigroup's strong performance in Q2 2026, highlighted by robust growth in investment banking and market revenues, positions the bank favorably for the remainder of the year. The maintained guidance and focus on efficiency improvements suggest a positive outlook, but analysts will be watching for competitive pressures and economic fluctuations that could impact future performance.

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#1

Got it. Okay. So maybe help us tie that through with what you're seeing so far in the second quarter, you've been -- what have you been seeing in terms of overall investment banking and markets and if you have any other updates for the quarter?

Unknown Executive

executive
#2

Yes. No. And I think probably in part of the continuation of what we saw in Q1 as it relates to the good and intense level of customer engagement, right, and customer appetite, I would say. If I go through, for example, investment banking in terms of fees, what we're seeing for the quarter is something along the lines of a mid-teens level of year-on-year growth, and that is anchored on equity activity, right? What you've seen IPOs picked up between Q1 and Q2 and what you're seeing in follow-on activities. In DCM, we're seeing investment great debt, also highly active, a bit more selective on the high-grade side -- I'm sorry, on the high yield side. And then on the -- all the selectivity as it relates to some of the sponsor activity as well. And so overall, fairly constructive in total as a wallet. In terms of markets of our market franchise, we're seeing in terms of revenue growth, high single digits to low double-digit revenue growth for the quarter. Some of the trends that we saw in Q1 -- I'm sorry, as a reminder, the -- remember that Q2 last year had the element of volatility into equities that the tariffs brought along. So it wasn't the lowest of quarters, let's just say, right? But even with that, we're seeing strength in equities in prime, in derivatives in line with our strategy to continue to drive prime. On the fixed income side, continuation of strength in currencies, in commodities and spreads is instinct with our strategy of driving financing and securitization. We're seeing good volumes in the second quarter as well. And those are stable, more stable source of revenue momentum across the franchise. And then -- the last piece I'll mention for Q2 is as it relates to cost of credit, we're expecting to be more or less in the range that we were in Q1. And that links up with our reserves which are probably more volume driven in the quarter given the client activity that we're seeing. And then on the NCL front, I just mentioned, I think, generally well within our expectations, seasonal patterns between Q1, Q2 down delinquencies and losses for -- on a year-on-year basis, Overall constructive.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#3

All right. Perfect. So investment banking up mid-teens markets up high single to low double digits off of a strong base in the second quarter of last year and cost of credit in line with 1 Q?

Unknown Executive

executive
#4

Yes, recognizing there's a few weeks ago. I should say this as you have go up here before I open my mouth. But of course, there's a few weeks to go and some of the things could change. And depending on timing, even on investment in banking fees, there could be more opportunity on that. But yes, that's what we're seeing today.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#5

Perfect. That's great. Okay. So at Investor Day, you focused a lot on 2027 and beyond. So I did want to spend some time on 2026 as well. You've given a target range for net interest income ex markets up 5% to 6% this year. And -- can you help us think through the puts and takes of that growth, particularly as we think about loan growth and deposit growth?

Unknown Executive

executive
#6

Yes. So no, thank you, and it's obviously a very pressing question. And let me start by mentioning a couple of things. First, as I said at our Investor Day, we are confident in that 5 to 6 that we will be able to deliver that guidance. If you look at what we've done recently in Q1, that NII X markets number was about 7% year-on-year growth. Last year, it was about 6%. We guided for the year mid-single-digit growth of the underlying drivers, deposit and loan growth. We are comfortable with guidance. And 1 key takeaway on NII X market is that the majority of the outcome for the guidance of this year is really on core of client-driven engagement and client-driven volumes. So when you look at deposits for a minute, what we're seeing in services, what we're seeing in our wealth business, how we're driving -- how Andy is driving both the retail bank and affluent customer volumes, which are high liquidity value for the firm and also what is driving on the private bank as he has been rewiring that for the last couple of years. I think that momentum in the mid-single-digit range feels good. And then on the loan side, ex markets -- we're seeing good momentum as it relates to wealth in the securities back lending in mortgages as well as on the U.S. cards front as well. Reminder also that in the second quarter, we acquired the American Airlines portion that was looked after by Barclays. And so that's coming in as well. But overall, in line with the spend that we spoke about as well.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#7

Got it. And as you think about that mid-single-digit deposit growth, we've been hearing from some banks saying that competition is picking up. Anything that you're seeing on either the corporate side or the consumer deposit pricing side that speaks to increasing competition?

Unknown Executive

executive
#8

Yes. Of course, we'll have to look and see a little bit, especially across the story on rates given the events in the Middle East may be shifting on us, right? The curve is right now pricing and increased towards the end of the year. A few months ago, that was a very different picture. And so that pivot may impact -- and that's why we want to be thoughtful about the guidance on the 5% to 6% because even though you may say, hey, isn't higher for longer, it will be better for banks. The answer is generally yes to that, but you also have to see the impact that it creates on the on the volumes and on the pricing. So far, the pricing and the betas are holding stable. I think there's a lot of what we get to see specialty related to services, which is about 2/3 of our funding sources. There's a lot of operational deposits anchored into the fact that we are a global bank in 90 countries and the customers. Our clients need us every day to make payroll and to really drive their commercial volumes around the world. And so we're highly embedded and therefore, the price sensitivity is not the same as you see in other pockets.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#9

Got it. And then maybe let's flip to noninterest revenues ex markets. You've talked about your expectations for growth. Can you walk us through the drivers of fee revenues across the businesses for this year? And I guess, what is -- what should we be considering as we think about that piece of the revenue?

Unknown Executive

executive
#10

Yes, thank you for the question. I think the -- I'm going to sound like a broken record, client-driven growth momentum. That's what we're focused on, right, commercial intensity and also not only being in high engagement mode with clients, but also making sure that the investments that we have been making are paying off. And we're seeing that. So if you look at Q1 and the drivers of the NIR x market, you had 15% revenue growth in services, You have 14% investment banking fees growth. And you had -- although you had a 5% on wealth, we were also lapping the fact that we sold our trust business a year ago. So if you look through investment revenue, investment fees, those were at also double digit at 11%. So we feel good about the momentum that we saw in Q1 and the continuation thereof and our expectations through the year, both as a combination of upping the level of accountability and engagement across our teams, but also the investments that we have been making across those franchises. So those 3 are going to be the primary drivers.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#11

Okay. Perfect. And I guess, the last part that 2026 discussion is on the efficiency ratio. You've spoken about an efficiency ratio of around 60% for the year. Are you -- are you still on track for that? And b, can you run through some of the drivers for that expense base this year?

Unknown Executive

executive
#12

Thank you. So I think a couple of things. And if I step back, the #1 commitment is our return expectation of 10% to 11% ROTCE. Sacrosanct very confident that we will be able to deliver that this year. Now operating efficiency was 1 of the components of that, right? So we guided around 60% to your point. And yes, we are confident that we will be able to deliver within that range. And what's important to us is if you look at operating efficiency and the progress we've been making, we had 2 years in a row where we've improved our operating efficiency down to 63%. We expect to repeat this year. with another 300 basis points of improvement or thereabouts at the -- around 60%. The key drivers of that obviously emanate from continued momentum on the client franchise and really seeing that revenue growth part of which is being driven by the investments we've made. Secondly, continuing to make progress on our structural efficiency sources, which are self-funding some of those investments going forward as well. So 3 pieces there. stranded costs which were about EUR 1.3 billion last year. You already can see in Q1, they were about $200 million. So even if you annualize that, you can see them coming down, and we expect to do -- for that to continue. -- transformation costs. Last year, they picked at $3.3 billion. Now I've spoken in the past about how roughly half of those are sitting in corporate other and are more temporary in nature. They were there to build the house. right? The other half are structural in nature and are there for us to stay with us as part of our fabric. And so the temporary ones, as we are reaching completion and we spoke about in the past, recently, how 90% of our programs are at or near completion. As we complete programs, we don't need to wait for exiting the consent or in order to be able to release some of those costs. So you're seeing that in the early innings of that, that would play out through the near term. And the third piece is structural efficiencies, right? Those have come from automation, technology automation and deploying AI. We have more than 100 of our kind of largest scale and most manual processes. Our COO, Anand and Tim Ryan, they met our tech head. They meet every single week with our work teams. And so we have a lot of rigor behind making sure that those 3 sources of funding for self-funding our investments for the future are there and clicking. And then the last piece, sorry, is RWA and capital optimization, right? Very focused on driving and making sure that within the businesses, we're very dynamic and thoughtful in how we allocate capital on a quarterly and daily basis.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#13

Great. So with all of that, still on track to that around 60% number and room for improvement. As we think about the AI-related spend that you just spoke about, -- can you talk about some early tangible benefits you're seeing on the AI side?

Unknown Executive

executive
#14

Sure. So the -- maybe let me talk about the approach and the focus on pockets of value that we're seeing to make it tangible. First, in the approach -- we take a dual approach. The dual approach is top-down and bottom-up. So down because there are some areas where you can see really scale benefit, and that requires the prioritization the senior management focus and the high urgency and intensity to monetize it, to size it to fund it, right, because you may need technology development. and really drive that. That's linked to what I was just talking about the structural officers those 100-plus processes that we are looking at end-to-end, and I'll come back to that in a second. The second piece is bottom up. We also want to unleash individual ingenuity right? And so how do we make available ARPUs to all of our team members, how do we enable them to grow and develop and upgrade themselves and also in their very specific -- not every role is homogeneous, right at the firm. You may have call centers. You may have KYC agents. Those jobs are more homogeneous. There are others that are not. How do you bring innovation and efficiency and that utility value to everyone at the firm is kind of the second piece of top-down and bottom-up. And then when we look at the value, we look at really 4 different buckets, right? One is enabling growth. So tangible there. How we're looking at wholesale credit, being able to make faster decisions that still pass our credit risk appetite, what we've been doing with AI machine learning on the credit card space, where we've seen improvements of 100 basis points on approval rates. All of those things are tangible things that I can see as far as driving and enabling growth. Then you have a vector of efficiency. Obviously, that I'm sure everybody is on the same boat there. But if you look at customer service, for example, and we've been at it for a couple of years now, just on Genii alone, we've seen improvements of cutting down the call time by seconds, right? That's a big number, not only in sales, but just think of the customer experience on having to be on the phone for so long and from a risk management perspective as well and also from an efficiency standpoint, And we're seeing that even on the corporate side in services, right? The containment rate of our City direct agents is up about 50%. All of that again is better service and more open. So you have almost like a triple win, right? It's risk, efficiency and customer experience. So that's the second vector. The third vector is defense. And so we're seeing a lot of application, not only in cyber, which has been in the press, but also in fraud, in AML, in all of those areas of defensive nature and that help us protect the bank. And the last piece is our people, not in that order, but the last piece is making sure that we are helping our team members innovate for the benefit of the firm, but also for self benefit, right, and making sure that everybody, myself included, right, that we upgrade ourselves, so we don't become the dynasoursoft tomorrow.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#15

I hear you. And I think the other piece of what you spoke about at Investor Day was the investment spend that you're making in the business, I think you spoke about $5 billion of investment spend. A lot of it is self-funded. So -- can you talk about where you're investing and maybe talk about the timing of some of those investments?

Unknown Executive

executive
#16

Yes. No, thank you. So maybe I'll start maybe with Principal One, which is we want to be very disciplined about this. So we recognize the importance that these investments are going to anchor our path to our near-term and medium-term returns. And at the same time, it's important that we keep the discipline in how we're going to fund these investments. And so we've spoken about how we're still funding them. I talked a little bit earlier about the levers, so I'm not going to repeat them again. Then when you look at the areas of focus, the other -- the second principle, in addition to the discipline and the self-funding is that these are not spread the peanut butter investments. These are very focused investments that are 100% aligned with our strategy. So even if I go 1 by one, you're going to see a very direct connect and that's how we hold ourselves accountable with our business heads and our teams into making sure that the linkage is direct. So if you think about markets, for example, and they spend most of it -- a good portion of his presentation talking about how we want to scale our equities business. So some of the technology platform and the talent investments that Andy is making that were enabled are linked to that piece in equities as well as continue to drive and maintain our leadership in fixed income. If you think about Investment Banking, Biz was talking about how -- we're investing in talent in certain sectors, right? We're investing in North America. We're investing in technology, in health care, in sponsors, which is an area that we weren't where we wanted to be, and we've been driving that. And this is, we talked about technology. We saw Sky and how we were deploying our AI agents. But at the same time, the investment in talent, right in bankers and relationship managers and the like and so -- as well as the product capabilities. If you look at our cards business, right, a very good return in business, and we want to drive the growth. So investing in marketing, right, in card acquisitions as well as digital experiences and engagement and driving loyalty for so that we're top of wallet card. And then when you look at services, of course, right, or a crown Jo, you want to make sure that we are constantly innovating on the platform because that is not only a defensive move, but also an offensive move, right, as you bring 2 multi-country, cross-border payment availability, we have to invest in the platform and really make sure that gives us not only the durability of those great returns that we get from the services franchise, but also enables consistent growth.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#17

So as you think about the timing of those investments, are they -- I guess, how many years are they spread out over? And how are you funding them?

Unknown Executive

executive
#18

So the funding is self-funded through cane costs coming down, right? What we said is during the near term. The near term, as a reminder, includes 2027, 2028. So these investments play out throughout '26,'27,'28 -- and how we think about the funding is when you look at the stranded costs, for example, right, $1.3 billion a year ago. We expect by the end of the near term that we're going to be down to 0. If you look at our transformation costs. And I said half of them are the ones that are temporary in nature, so half of 3.3%. Again, we expect those by the end of our near-term period to be down to 0 as well. And then in terms of the structural efficiencies across those 100 processes and those apply to functions and operational areas, we are also expecting to see progress. So those are the sources that are funding, right, our ability to do this investment. That's why it's important, as we thought about operating efficiency targets, that returns is really #1 and that's really the true north. And we want to give ourselves in any given year the flexibility of being able to do the -- not only the instant gratification but also the anchor the returns for the longer range.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#19

So just on the transformation spend, the portion of it, which is in the corporate other segment versus a portion of it, which is in the different businesses, I guess, how is that different? I know the corporate other is more temporary in nature, but how are the 2 spends different?

Unknown Executive

executive
#20

Yes. So corporate others -- those are now more temporary. It was the ones that we needed to build the house, when the house is built, you don't need those costs anymore. Those are starting to come down already as we reach completion of the programs. The second type, the ones that are more structural in nature, those are embedded across our businesses and our functions. And so those will be equally, first of all, they are there to stay, but they're going to be also subject to the 100 processes that I was talking on that other bucket, right, on the structure of the find. So we're still going to go and try to automate the AI and technology dose as well, right?

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#21

Got it. All right. Perfect. So well, you also mentioned in terms of the ROTCE for the year, your guide is 10% to 11% ROTE for 2026. In 1Q, you already did a 13% ROCE. I mean, obviously, there is some seasonality there. You answered my question, sir. So I'll say that. But 13% in 1Q is still strong. I guess, what would -- if I were to push you a little bit, what would prevent you from being at the top end of that 10% to 11% roughly?

Unknown Executive

executive
#22

Yes. No, thank you. Good question. And as we said in our first earnings call and our Q1 call, yes, please let's not do that times 4 because there is seasonality into the business. But what I would say is, well, first of all, -- we're confident in the 10 to 11 number one. Number two, because we're confident because we're seeing the client momentum and the client intensity. We intend to keep, and we have had so far very good expense discipline as well as what we're seeing in the capital and RWA management, how thoughtful the team is and how we approach that. So those 3 things give me confidence. In terms of what would determine where we are exactly on the range, I think a couple of factors. Number one, the environment, and we know some of the lines can swing relatively quickly. So if we continue to see constructive volumes and levels of client activity, obviously, you can be on 1 side of the range, but also the flexibility of deploying some of the investments that we were talking about before, right? And how do we gear those up and down to make sure that we are -- we have higher certainty of the path thereafter.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#23

Yes. Got it. All right. Perfect. Maybe 1 point of clarification from the Investor Day. You've spoken about the DTA utilization also being an important part of how you manage capital in the near term. And I think -- you've spoken about $800 million or so of DTA utilization for 2026 and then I know you haven't given a specific number, but if I all the Investor Day deck, it's about half of the $14 billion or so in DTA that you intend to utilize over the next 3 years. Can you go through some of the drivers behind that? And what drives the acceleration versus the $800 million this year?

Unknown Executive

executive
#24

Yes. No, thank you. And I think it's a very good area, as exciting as it is for all of us to talk about DTA over here. I'm sure we did a show of hands for who enjoys DTA profusely. I'm not sure if maybe you and I are right you might be surprised, maybe a spec team, I think, potentially. But a couple of things. I think number one, recognition that this is a show-me part of our story, right, because we haven't been burning down DTA in the last few years. And the reason is 90% of it is driven by U.S. profitability. Now what gives me confidence is last year, we had $4 billion of profitability in the U.S. This -- you can see this in our disclosures. And when you think about the strategic and the forward momentum that we have in terms of delivering performance, it's got to almost impossible to do well in all the other commitments and not be able to produce higher degrees of U.S. profitability that will anchor the DTA consumption. So that gives us the confidence to -- even though we hadn't been burning for the last couple of years to say this first year of that -- of this new period, we're going to do $800 million is the guidance. But then as you look forward to me, the answer is relatively straightforward, is the performance of our strategy and the delivery of everything else that we said will naturally yield that burn down that we spoke about. So you heard from some of the businesses, of course, U.S. cards good return in business and driving growth. We need to deliver the growth. That's 100% U.S.-based profit. If you look at wealth Well, we know we work to do in terms of returns. But just look at the trajectory from Andy's business over the last couple of years, right? Even Q1 was 11% revenue growth, 1% expense growth. Last year, I think it was 13.3% or 14.3%. And so as long as we're keeping -- and we have good confidence in that very -- those big jobs that we're seeing, we're going to see that improvement. A lot of it plays out in the U.S. as well. You heard from services, we have very good momentum in deposits. Part of it is in North America, some new mandates we're signing with some of the largest asset management companies in security services. And of course that Best talked a lot about how the investments in North America as far as talent is concerned and some of the pools there. and markets also equities and fixed income, a lot of that activity and the growth that we're looking at there in equities, a lot of it happens in the U.S. So when you look at all of that, we're making investments in our home strategy and that will anchor the 90% of the DTA is really linked to U.S. profitability.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#25

Got it. So as U.S. profitability improves, that DTA utilization improves nicely. Okay, perfect. So -- let's talk about some of the Investor Day targets and the time lines there. there's 2 phases that you laid out at Investor Day, 11% to 13% ROTCE in the near term and then 14% to 15% in the medium term. Can you remind us what are the main drivers of getting to the near term and then getting to the medium term?

Unknown Executive

executive
#26

Yes. No, thank you. So in the near term, we said 11% to 13%, and we said that the second year, so 2028, we expect to be towards the higher end of that range. just because we recognize it a little bit wide. 3 main drivers. The number one, continuing the client momentum. And that anchored not only in the commercial intensity across our 5 franchises, but also the level of self-funded investments that we're deploying across that piece, right? And so that to me is a key -- 1 of the key 3 factors. The second 1 is structural efficiencies, right? And we've spoken about stranded costs during the whole period of near term, making solid progress there. transformation costs that are temporary in nature coming down and then driving those structural efficiencies through automation and digitization. And so those are kind of 3 pieces. The third piece is capital productivity. And so burning down the DTA and continuing to make progress on our strategy. Now as a reminder, we did not bake in any benefit from neither the NPR as it relates to Basel III, G-SIB or stress capital buffer nor any improvements in the stress capital buffer over in the course of time with our PPNR growing as we continue to execute our strategy. We have not baked that in. But those are the 3 levers. And then when you think and jump into the medium term, which is 2029 to 2031, that's a different bank as well because you're not going to have stranded costs, right? We don't have legacy franchisees at that point. We don't have any of the temporary transformation costs. So it really is kind of the pure version of the 5 core businesses. the firm at that point, driving the growth and efficiency.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#27

And then you have the operating efficiencies as well that you've built on with the investment plan. So maybe a follow-up on that. As you mentioned, the One area of focus from investors has been the underlying capital assumptions behind the ROTCE targets. And clearly, we're going to get some benefits from Basel and game, GSIB surcharge, stress capital buffer should also be a positive. Are there -- is there any additional color you can give us there on the capital side?

Unknown Executive

executive
#28

So what I'd say is a couple of things. First, maybe the baseline reminder, right, because I may be the start in the room, not everybody is required to learn all these things, right, and remember them. Our current target is 12.6% because it's 11% plus our 100 basis points management buffer. What we talked about at Investor Day, our assumption is that, that number becomes 13.1% under current rules, because we're drifting on the GCI curve on the basis of enabling our businesses with clients. And that happens starting in 2028. So our assumption is 12.6% now. and into 28 -- beginning of 2028, 131. That's what we assumed for all the returns that we've spoken about at Investor Day. Now at the same time, what has happened -- what we expect to happen is we talked about how Basel III and GSIB, we expect to see a moderate benefit for us in that equation. -- subject to, obviously, the feed bid that is being provided to regulators and whether they're going to adjust anything. But in terms of what they have published so far, you have the puts and takes of the retail and corporate plus the gC coefficient being a positive and some of it moderated by FRTB, CBA operational risk and some of those components as well. But then -- and then obviously a question mark as to as we gain more transparency into the models from the Fed and also the adjustment of those models, what we can expect in terms of SUV still unknown. And then the other piece that is obviously more controlled by us and that we haven't included baked is the fact that as our strategy and we continue to focus on performance and drive better returns, our PPNR will continue to improve, and that will give us a bigger softener that hopefully over time will also have impact on NAV. So you have a couple of levers there that we are expecting to drive improvement. We have seen it in the last couple of years, that last event right the last element of PPNR, we used to be at 4.2 million best capital buffer and now we're at 3.6%. And so yes, we have not baked those in. Of course, internally, we have a sense for what that could look like. But yes, I think we -- hopefully, by the end of the year, we have more clarity on where that leads.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#29

Yes, we might even get a little bit more clarity as we get to the end of this month, and we get the stress test results as well. Okay. Gonzalo, you've kept out some time. We've covered a lot of stuff in this session. Maybe summarizes for us in terms of the key points you would like investors to take away from both this session and maybe even Investor Day.

Unknown Executive

executive
#30

I would say, hopefully, you can tell by a lot of the other pieces as opposed to me having to spell it out, but I think we're a very different city. Now we spent the better part of the last several years, fixing ourselves and really remediating what was holding us back. And now we're really focused on client-driven growth on operational performance driving. And so when I talk about accountability, we're going to talk about the relentless execution mindset that's really what's going to end up driving the results. It's really the boring, but equally as exciting if you can get there of every single day, looking at how am I engaging with clients, how am I driving efficiency, how am I using every unit of capital to make sure that we drive those returns and the long-term value creation that is the true north.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#31

Very clear. Joe, thanks so much for your time.

Unknown Executive

executive
#32

Thank you very much.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Citigroup Inc. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Citigroup Inc. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.