Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc. (DNB) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 10, 2024

NYSE US conference_presentation 34 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Manav Patnaik

analyst
#1

Good afternoon, everybody. Thanks for being here. My name is Manav Patnaik. I cover information services at Barclays. And I'm happy to have with us here Bryan Hipsher, who's the CFO of Dun & Bradstreet. So Bryan, thanks for being here.

Bryan Hipsher

executive
#2

Yes. Thanks, Manav, for having us.

Manav Patnaik

analyst
#3

Yes, of course. I mean, let's just start with the big news out there. You guys see them put out a press release saying you had received interest. I know you're limited in what you can say but maybe just some perspective from your end on that press release?

Bryan Hipsher

executive
#4

Yes. It's one of the things that shortly after earnings, there was a news article that came out and then we responded to it. That again, inbound interest had come in, we've engaged the bankers appropriately from that perspective. But I think someone asked me, were you surprised? And I said, not really that inbound interest was coming in because as you've known the business for a long time, where we were to where we are today with mid-single-digit growth and near 40% margins and then improving margins and then improving profile and lot of assets that I think are going to create even more growth over the coming years to be trading at the multiple that we were trading at. It was a disconnect from our perspective in terms of valuation and where the company was. And so we're dealing with it appropriately. And again, from Anthony's perspective, from my perspective, the team's perspective, we're here to drive shareholder value. And so that's why we take all of these things seriously, and we'll make sure we're driving the right outcome.

Manav Patnaik

analyst
#5

Got it. And just to clarify, I mean, the interest was for the whole company, right? Because there was some confusion initially because I think on your earnings call, you talked about how 10% of your business could be up for review or whatever.

Bryan Hipsher

executive
#6

Yes. So that commentary was to the entire business is where the interest was. What we had discussed on the earnings call was, look, 90% of the business is growing about 6%, right? And it has been for the trailing 12 months. There are 2 components: the Credibility business, which is about half of that, so call it, $120 million. And then the other side is that Digital Marketing business. Credibility is in a phase where we've gone through a lot of investment, a lot of transformation there. It had some open kind of FTC investigation when we bought the business, gosh, it took 3 years, right, almost 3.5 that kind of formally get the consent order. And we've been kind of feeling the impacts of that. But now it's a phase where it's kind of run down, we're getting to where you expect it to be more flattish in the third quarter and then start to pick up in the fourth. But again, had more structural issues from that side that we just needed to work through. And then the Digital Marketing side, a little bit more transactional. So in the Digital Marketing space, I think really late last year, kind of late through 3Q and the 4Q, you just started to see a little bit of constrained spending in that B2B digital marketing. And part of that was Google was talking about deplicating the cookie. And overall, I think, fears of a recession and those types of things just created a little bit of dynamic where there was a little bit of sluggishness from that perspective. We're now seeing that start to one; come over the comps as we get into 3Q and 4Q. And then secondly, Google is now not deprecating the cookie, which I think takes away some of that ambiguity. But our commentary there was like, look, we look to fix businesses, right? And we want them to start to perform from that perspective. But we're also mindful from what we laid out a medium-term range, 5% to 7%. And we don't want 10% of the business, ultimately, masking the other 90%. That's really valuable and really driving forward from that perspective. So as we get towards the end of the year, we'll evaluate, hey, are they on track? Are they doing what they need to do? Or are there some things that we should do in terms of minority sale, partnership, full sale of those assets to make sure that we're meeting our objectives and the type of profile that we want the company to exit.

Manav Patnaik

analyst
#7

Got it. But is it fair to say that those 2 businesses at that 10% is noncore to the franchise then? Like is it something you should be looking at either way?

Bryan Hipsher

executive
#8

Yes, it's interesting. When you look at credibility, right, the data that comes into it, right, and there is some tangential connection from that perspective. So I wouldn't say it's completely noncore, right? But could it be better placed in a minority investment? Could it be better placed in a sale with a relationship back to that proprietary data feed? It's possible, right? I think there's a lot we could be doing for small businesses. We talked about that earlier. Traditionally, had been very credit focused and very focused around improving trade. But the things we're doing with credit insights, the things that we could do with some of our other products in terms of bringing them down to scale for a small business versus for an enterprise-size solution and then really differentiating the small businesses within our ecosystem, right? So if you think about being a vendor to the Walmarts of the world, to the Amazon businesses and how we can create differentiation in terms of credit worthiness in terms of social right or sustainability practices. Those are all things that we're really innovating on and thinking about how we could differentiate and bring something a little bit evolved from where credibility was in the past. Digital marketing it's an extension, obviously, of what we do. It's just a little bit more transactional. I would say, if you said, which one of the 2 is half a step, a mean further, maybe it's on that side of the equation. So it makes sense, right? And there's a nice flow-through of using that data for building audiences, using that kind of business to person identity graph and building that out. But at the same time, again, it's one of those that it makes sense to an extent, right, if you were just thinking about it from a business perspective. But if you're thinking about it from an overall kind of profile perspective in the public light, that's where we just want to be mindful from that side of the equation.

Manav Patnaik

analyst
#9

Got it. And then if you could just take that a step back as well. I think I've asked the question several calls ago but Finance and Risk, and Sales & Marketing, like how connected are the 2 together? Can they be separated? Just talk about the connectivity there.

Bryan Hipsher

executive
#10

Yes. So look, in the end, we always said that anything can be done, right, from that perspective. I think there's -- especially when you think about 60% of that Sales & Marketing business is Master Data Management, right? And when you're talking about master client record, master vendor record, there is some pretty deep connectivity from that perspective. So if you were to do that, you would need to think about some type of data licensing arrangement over a long period of time. And clearly, the Dun is a big part of that, right? But it is possible from that perspective. When you think about, obviously, what that kind of course that means. If you think about MDM, you're really establishing off of the back of the Dun, the hierarchy, the entity resolution, the matching, then the core data set in terms of like pharmagraphics, employee, some of the revenue, some of those trends, they're useful on both sides of the equation. It's then when you get into the more specialized data sets, whether it's shipping assets that are leading indicators on the Finance and Risk side or its propensity to transact or buy our intent on the Sales and Marketing side, that's where, obviously, it gets differentiated because you're meeting the needs of a Chief Marketing Officer versus you're meeting the needs of a CFO.

Manav Patnaik

analyst
#11

Got it. Before we go into some of the segment specifics, we've been asking our other companies, especially the consumer goods and kind of their macro view. You guys have a unique insight into, I guess, SMB and private businesses and so forth. Just from the trends you're seeing from the interactions you're having any kind of broader macro comments that you can share?

Bryan Hipsher

executive
#12

Yes. I mean, look, you know this about us, too, like we talked about this very small portion of the business that has a little bit of transaction revenues. But really, from a business perspective, macro is something that is interesting from our perspective but we're not guided by volumes in things like issuance or my old days at Fidelity National Financial when title volumes fluctuated versus mortgage originations, those types of things. What I would say, though, is the general sentiment, I think of businesses is improving. And especially, look, as the Fed is being more conclusive around a rate cut coming in September and some of that financial easing, I think is creating positivity from that perspective in terms of how they're thinking about being more front-footed in 2025 and beyond.

Manav Patnaik

analyst
#13

Got it. So maybe let's just touch on some of the segments real quickly. So Sales & Marketing is about 40% of your overall revenues. You said 60% of that is the Master Data Management business. Let's just touch on that real quickly, like, how unique is that offering? What is the competition, if at all?

Bryan Hipsher

executive
#14

Yes. We have this conversation a little early too on the, if at all, right? It is a really unique differentiated asset. When you think about the global scale, the footprint, the vastness of and acceptance of the Dun throughout the world, someone said, it's almost like a social security number, I said, "Yes, social security numbers interesting in the United States but you got to Germany, you go to China, you go to India, you go to Sweden, not so much anymore". The Dun very much is, right? And so from that perspective, not only the depth and breadth of the data set, right, 530 million entities up to 4,000 elements per entity. You're talking about really broad coverage. So our MDM plays very, very well in large -- in especially mega-size enterprises, right? So companies that have global client sets, global vendor sets, global supply chains. That's where mastering your data, having that relied upon golden client record, golden vendor record, and even a 360 analysis from that perspective. It's a very unique proposition. And so where we play Master Data, I think there's tools and there's different kind of definitions from that perspective. When you're really thinking about commercial and you're thinking about it from a global perspective, yes, we're in a quite unique position from that perspective. And it's been growing, as you know, high single digits, right, really strong, really profitable, very embedded and sticky, great pricing power but also a lot of ability to expand. So from a model perspective, we allow, obviously, the number of Dun is kind of the quantity, right? Then the data elements is a component of it. And then also the geographies that it covers is another component of it. And so while you're in, there's a lot of room to continue to expand and build. And then the more assets we bring in, the more use cases we can fulfill the more broadly you can drive that from that perspective. So really, really something that we're excited about, and I'm sure we'll touch on Gen AI at some point too but it's foundational from our perspective in having a true kind of use case and driven Gen AI strategy. Because again, for us, we bring in all the large language models into D&B AI labs, and you see the differentiation of testing it, which is publicly available data and kind of, I would say, cleansed and curated data sets and then what it means to bring in our data against it and then what it means to bring in our data with aging assistance against Gen AI, it's really powerful. And you see the differentiation and accuracy and hallucinations, and so when you think about embedding this within workflows and really driving efficiency and effectiveness as you go forward, it's going to matter that those answers are right and consistent and based upon the best data that it can be.

Manav Patnaik

analyst
#15

Got it. Two quick follow-ups. The MGM business is typically kind of like an end of year activity like it tends to be the fourth quarter loaded, right? Why is that dynamic? And is there -- to your point on more opportunity for penetration, why can that be more consistently throughout the year?

Bryan Hipsher

executive
#16

Yes. And it's interesting because it is consistent throughout the year. What you end up with is that on the Sales & Marketing side because MDM ends up being used on both sides of the equation, right? If you think about on the Finance and Risk side, where it gets used is, imagine you have business with Barclays, right? We'll think about all of the entities you have throughout the world, all those subsidiaries, any of the acquisitions that you did. If I said what's our receivables exposure to Barclays, you'd come back, you know what I mean after 3 weeks like we did when I was at FIS before we used DNB and cobble together what that exposure is as best as you can. That's where MDM can play into both sides of the equation, right? And that's where it's used, I would say, consistently throughout the year. What you have sometimes in these MDM agreements are, they're 12 months and especially on the sales side, they tend to get utilized right for claims matched, dedup and append prior to year-end as sales organizations and marketing organizations are getting ready to launch into the following year. And so what happens is from a rev rec perspective, for instance, while the 12 months is guaranteed, if we're doing quarterly deliverables, then it can be based upon the amount delivered quarter-to-quarter that creates some of that dynamic. So you've seen the quarters have gotten a lot more smooth. The fourth quarter has a little bit of that dynamic plus or minus. But generally speaking, it's a really consistent proposition from quarter.

Manav Patnaik

analyst
#17

Got it. And given the strength of the asset you described, I mean you mentioned pricing has been a growth driver. So how much of that high single growth has been pricing at MDM?

Bryan Hipsher

executive
#18

Yes. I mean we haven't broken it, I would say, for everyone in terms of individual products from that perspective. But if you look at where we're at right now, we went from less than 1% of price when we took over the business back in 2019. This year, it's contributing, call it, around like 2.5%. And -- and that's something -- that includes things like Bisnode as we continue to migrate those contracts off of legacy to current. We're now building in that multiyear contract element with price increases from that perspective. So we think over the next few years, moving into that 3%, 3.5% is very reasonable from that perspective.

Manav Patnaik

analyst
#19

Got it. And I think you mentioned global opportunity but is MDM like U.S. international split?

Bryan Hipsher

executive
#20

Yes. It's interesting because, again, now -- and this is where some of the acquisitions of the worldwide network partners and where Bisnode really came into place because we got direct access to Siemens, right, to Volkswagen to IKEA in Scandi. In those countries that are more manufacturing that are more industrial, they tend to really need things like you can imagine third-party risk compliance and MDM from that perspective. And so a larger portion of the end-to-end business, I would say, started in North America, especially with the multinational corporations, where you're seeing it take on very, very nicely in Europe and the U.K. over the past like a year or 2.

Manav Patnaik

analyst
#21

Got it. So maybe let's just touch on the 60% of Sales & Marketing is MDM. What is the other 40%?

Bryan Hipsher

executive
#22

Yes. If you split it, sales acceleration, which was really Hoovers is another, call it, like $100-ish million from that perspective. And again, business went through, frankly, it needed UI refresh, needed data enhancement. And that's where, I would say, had always great, deep marketing research capabilities, great from a business perspective and account-based perspective. But the contact side was a place that we needed to catch up, right? And so we've done that, and you see the business kind of turn from what was, frankly, before we got kind of a perennial mid-single-digit decline into now a low single-digit grower. And there's pockets of differentiation, for instance, where we're introducing as a new solution throughout some of the European regions, it's growing double digits, right? So good balance from that side. Digital Marketing, we talked about already in that kind of $120 million, $130 million range, right, which is the other big chunk, I would say, of the Sales & Marketing business. And again, that has to do with like audience targeting, online B2B audiences. And so if you go from the perspective of a lot of consumer advertising occurs at the [indiscernible] level in terms of like Basware, both like English Premier League, right? And so then it's thinking about presenting us with an ad for a new kit or a new pair of shoes, right? From our perspective, we're looking at it in terms of the twist from -- this looks like the CFO of a multibillion dollar corporation. And therefore, when he's on the Wall Street Journal in the background, the Microsoft, the SAPs, the Workdays, the Oracles are competing to present a treasury workstation at, right, which is higher dollar, higher value, right? But you need a much more focused in understanding of who that individual is more from a business lens than you are from a consumer lens. And then the last, there's kind of, again, some smaller products that were just kind of legacy components, especially in Europe. These are maybe $30 million, $40 million, right, that tend to get migrated ultimately up into where we are with the core products that we already laid out.

Manav Patnaik

analyst
#23

Got it. And so just maybe going backwards. The Digital Marketing, you already kind of addressed in there, it seems like just a broader competitive marketplace. But on the Hoovers, the acceleration side, you talked about catching up on the contact database. So what number are you at there? Like how do you compare that now versus before?

Bryan Hipsher

executive
#24

Yes. I mean when we got here, I think we had roughly like -- and will differentiate because the contact database now is over like, I think, 200 million or 300 million, right? But that also includes what I would say are like the non-key decision makers within an organization. If we go to the key decision makers, it's grown from, I think it was like 7 million when we got there. And frankly, there were probably 3 million that had any type of relevance. Now it grew to like 30 million -- I think we're somewhere in the 40 million to 50 million range at this point.

Manav Patnaik

analyst
#25

And is that the area basically where you see ZoomInfo as your competitors? Just to clarify some confusion, if it's the entire Sales & Marketing business? Is it just this? Is it more than this?

Bryan Hipsher

executive
#26

It's really -- this is the area where a company like Zoominfo where we come across. When you think about the rest of it, the MDM, these are enterprise very deep, very ingrained relationships on that side. We don't come across, frankly, a whole lot of people at that level and definitely not more of the contact play in the sales kind of platform play from that side. That's really that, call it, 90 million to 100 million that's Hoovers.

Manav Patnaik

analyst
#27

Got it. And I think just in comparing Hoovers versus the competition there, like, I think, like you said, when you first came in, it was not in a good shape, right? And that allowed the competition to probably leap ahead a little bit. But what you -- you said it's growing low single digits now. Is that the expected growth rate? Or do you think you can play catch up versus competition?

Bryan Hipsher

executive
#28

Yes, I think over time -- look, I think -- and we're speaking right from my hand gestures, it probably won't be overly helpful. But like some of the things you've seen rapid growth and then you've also seen rapid deceleration, right? I think for us, we've really seen this kind of consistent growth in execution from that side, building upon the organic growth really each and every year since we've been here. So I think on Hoovers, there's some things that we're doing there, for instance, on the AI side. And so we're embedding an assistant within Hoovers to allow it to more, I would say, with natural language, ask the questions from that perspective, right? So if you say, "Hey, I'm interested in I'm building a new green server, right? I want companies that are 4,000 or more employees in Latin America that are -- have high sustainability practices, right? Now it's going in clearing against the data and coming back with generated outcomes from that perspective, they think is really powerful, right, in terms of usability and how it can evolve over the next few years. Another one in there that's even broader is the DNB at D&B, right? And this one is, I would say, on all of our data set. And really the ability just to ask questions and come back with immediate answers, the applicability is really broad from that perspective. And so for us, obviously, in the background too, we're setting things up in terms of how do we track the usage, right? What are the billing mechanisms, how do you allow for the Finance and Risk questions if we get in and say to Sales & Marketing because we differentiate that in terms of the commercial model. But these are the things where we're trying to apply AI and Gen AI in truly practical manners that can drive some real differentiation in the market.

Manav Patnaik

analyst
#29

Got it. Let's just shift to the Finance and Risk business, 60% of your revenues. And I would argue that's kind of the main area that investors have always been attracted to. So you already talked about the Dun's number being kind of the social security number globally, if you call it that. But just talk about the data that you have in the Finance and Risk business. How much of it is proprietary? What you've done since you took over to kind of enhance that?

Bryan Hipsher

executive
#30

Yes. I mean -- and again, it's a great point because 2 things: one, the Finance Solutions business very deeply embedded, right, very, very inelastic from that side. And then it kind of spawned off the third-party risk and compliance side. I think in terms of what we talked about too before, understanding the MDM portion of it, right, and how unique that is, and frankly, similar in terms of value and value proposition is really, I think, critical when you think about the whole pie right of what D&B is. But the data sources, obviously, we did a lot of work early in terms of infrastructure upgrades, right? And now we're in kind of the last stages of full kind of cloud migration, a lot on the data supply chain, right, in the data cloud, making sure that we can scale and make sure you ensure we can have throughput from that side. So when you look at the characteristics and the output, we went from about 315 million tons to now 530 million plus, right? Ultimate beneficial ownership data was 10 million. Now it's up to, I think, 100 million, 150 million, right. We brought in shipping data, right? It was a great asset that ended up having many more use cases, right, than we originally thought. And I know we're talking about the existing but moving us into capital markets, I think, in private credit and private company data, that's where the core of the asset lives, right? So while, of course, it has the typical public company data that's out there, it's really the private company data. So I think 120 million, 200 million private company financial statements, right? Private company data that's contributory in terms of their trade and their payables and receivables information that is coming from the largest Fortune 500, Fortune Global 1,000 throughout the world. When you come in and you want to be vendor to a really large retailer or you want to be a participant in the Google Play store or in the Apple App Store. You have to have a Dun, you have to have earning information, although that comes into us and only us from that perspective. So we use that, obviously, as the base. But of course, we're going out and some are contractual, right? So some of the data we get that is on energy consumption, right? We have an exclusive relationship with the provider, right? Some of them, of course, we use registries and we use public company data, right, that's available to supplement and complement. But again, that matching that, I would say, entity resolution and those algorithms that sit behind that, those are all proprietary from that perspective. So it's a really, I would say, overall unique and extremely proprietary data set in data cloud that allows us to do a lot of interesting things.

Manav Patnaik

analyst
#31

Got it. And so just kind of how we broke out Sales & Marketing to the different buckets. Can you just help within F&R, like what are the -- how would you break that business?

Bryan Hipsher

executive
#32

Yes, bigger chunk Finance Solutions, right? And again, very, I would say, embedded. In North America, it's more multiyear contracts with the price escalator and then we're really trying to upsell and cross-sell off of that, expanding the third-party risk and spanning in cap markets. On the international side, there is actually a good room to really Finance Analytics is kind of the flagship UI. It's also delivered, obviously, through API from that perspective too. But there's probably more room to add new logos, right, in terms of larger businesses in that space throughout Europe and Asia. Third-party risk and compliance, Dun grown, I think, double digits now for 13 of the last 14 quarters or 13 of the last 13, really around KYC, KYB, around supply chain risk management. And again, a nice complement in terms of sourcing, procurement, onboarding, monitoring, tends to be an extension of the CFO's office. So very, very germane, something that continues to grow and expand and what that underwriting process means in that it used to be financed, right? And it would say, okay, what's the financial stability of these vendors and suppliers that's coming on? Then it became regulatory and compliance. So you can imagine labor practices, environmental and fractions, these types of things are all really critical because your suppliers and vendors are an extension of your business. Well now things like social, right, understanding veteran-owned businesses, female-owned businesses, minority-owned businesses, et cetera, is really important, right, when you think about who you're doing business with and how you can continue to expand from that perspective. Sustainability, right, is another component. And so as we think about each of these pieces, we try to bring more and more value around that change to cyber, right? It's kind of the next component of the exposure a lot of times. The companies from a cyber perspective is when they have a third party that has a breach and then they end up coming in through that perspective. So we're trying to continue to innovate in that space and bring that risk profile to our customers.

Manav Patnaik

analyst
#33

Got it. And on the international side, you said new logo opportunity. Is that the Internet -- I guess it ties a little bit to a few different questions. So first, do you need more data on the international side to penetrate that further? And then just also remind us of the worldwide network and also your plan that you did the Bisnode acquisition after going public but then it's kind of stalled there?

Bryan Hipsher

executive
#34

Yes. So for instance, on the data side, I mean, look, we believe we have the best data on the planet, right, in Europe and in Asia, in depth and breadth in ownership, right, from that perspective. So while the worldwide network is kind of like a franchise there used to be a lot of them used to be part of Dun & Bradstreet. It's an exclusive one-to-one from that perspective, it feeds into our world-based file. And while we're buying that data, right, that data is ours, right? And we'll continue to be ours for the rest of until we decide not to it, right? If you look at the worldwide network and look, from a leverage perspective, when we came out, we were at 9x levered in the go private. Thankfully, I've got Dun & Bradstreet, so with my little kids, I slept like a baby, which was fine. But we used the IPO and then we subsequently continued to drive that down to, we expect to be about 3.5x by the end of the year. And as we migrate that down and continue to delever, I think as we think about opportunities in terms of M&A, there's clearly tuck-ins and things like that from that. But then there's some of the partners out there like Bisnode, that make a lot of sense, right? Controlling those markets, having a direct relationship with the customers, those are all things certainly that we think about. In terms of incremental data there, I mean we went -- give you a good example in Greater China, I think, from maybe 10 million businesses to now like 70 million businesses. And so when you're thinking about supply chain, you're thinking about partners from that region, it's really expanded from that perspective. And so I think we're in a great place there. It's really finishing up some of the migrations and then continuing to drive those localized solutions into the markets. And Neeraj and the team have done a great job accelerating the growth of that. I mean, before even the Bisnode, we were kind of growing high singles, low doubles. Bisnode was clearly something that was, I think, declining 2% organically, and now it's in mid-single digits, right? And so that's on a net basis also with some of these migrations that are occurring. So in a good spot, it's about continued execution and we've got to keep bringing new product, I would say, more so than even new data into those markets.

Manav Patnaik

analyst
#35

Got it. So on the capital allocation side, it sounds like you want to be in the low 3s and then the priority would be M&A over other forms of return.

Bryan Hipsher

executive
#36

Look, I would say on M&A, and we've discussed this too, the fact where it's trading. Like it's hard to find another business with the profile that we would have. So not doing buybacks would be difficult is what I would say. But outside of that, if things kind of get righted from that perspective and we're kind of trading in a valuation where we think is within a realm of reasonableness from our side, then I think M&A starts to be something that we can unlock a little bit more from that perspective. The dividend is kind of out there and we'll continue that from that perspective. But if I think organic growth, right, deleveraging the balance sheet and then it's kind of the buybacks and M&A as we go forward.

Manav Patnaik

analyst
#37

Got it. And then just one last question on the organic growth side, the 5% to 7% range that you're aspiring to, you're 4% today, it excluding the businesses. Just talk about how margins should progress maybe on the lower end of that spectrum?

Bryan Hipsher

executive
#38

Yes. I mean we've talked about like in that kind of 50 to 100 bps. I mean you've seen this year even in the first couple of quarters where we were a little over 4%, right? We were still in that 50, 70 bps, right, on a year-over-year basis. So on that side, look, the business has a great ability to continue to scale. And even this year, we were mindful that, look, there was some additional, call it, like $8 million, $10 million that we put back into AI, that we could have expanded margins a little bit more, but we're always trying to do things for the business that we're getting into that kind of continued mid-single digit and then starting to drive towards that higher single digits, there's a lot of contribution that comes from that, which gives us even more flexibility to invest in the future. So -- but I'd say in that general zone that kind of 50 to 100 bps is reasonable from that perspective.

Manav Patnaik

analyst
#39

Got it. Great. Well, we're almost out of time. So let's just end it there. Thank you so much, Bryan. I appreciate it.

Bryan Hipsher

executive
#40

absolutely. Thanks for the time, Manav.

Manav Patnaik

analyst
#41

Thank you everybody.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc. transcript — plus 258,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc. earnings transcripts and 258,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.

More tools for stock research

OptionsBell: an unusual options activity scanner that tracks options flow across all US stocks and emails you when large trades appear in Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc. or any ticker on your watchlist.

StockMarketScan: a stock screener with alerts: 24 pre-built screens refreshed every 5 minutes, watchlists and email notifications. Both offer API and MCP access and fair monthly pricing.