Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

November 13, 2026

New York Stock Exchange US Consumer Staples Food Products earnings

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

J.T. Rieck

executive
#1

Thanks, and good morning everyone. I trust you've all had a chance to look over our earnings release, hear the prepared remarks, and check out the slide presentation, all of which went up earlier today on our investor relations website. Once today's Q&A session wraps up, an audio replay of this call will be posted as well. I'd like to point out that during this Q&A session, we might make forward-looking statements regarding the company's performance. While we consider those statements reasonable, they carry risks and uncertainties that could make actual results come in materially different. Beyond what you hear in these remarks, key factors concerning Flowers Foods' business are laid out in full in our SEC filings. We also present non-GAAP financial measures, and disclosure along with reconciliations for those appears in the earnings release and at the end of the slide presentation on our website. With me today are Ryals McMullian, our Chairman and CEO, and Anthony Scaglione, our CFO. Ryals, over to you.

Ryals McMullian

executive
#2

All right. Thanks, J.T., and good morning to everybody. As you heard during our prepared remarks, the results we posted mirrored a lot of the difficult conditions that we talked about last quarter, and they underscored areas where we have to pick up the pace and place more weight on disciplined execution. Although we're seeing some encouraging signals in the business, among them better sequential trends and rising awareness within the Nature's Own franchise, improvement came more slowly than we had expected, and even so, we aren't standing pat. We're speeding up efforts that are already underway so that our value proposition lines up better with where the market is headed. That covers pushing innovation forward, going after new business, and putting investment behind our leading brands. We're enthusiastic about the progress we're making and about what it means for the future of our business. Even though it's taking a while for these efforts to show up in our results, they're setting us on a stronger path ahead and building our confidence in the long-term potential of the business. The large, appealing markets we serve, spanning fresh packaged bread, cake, better-for-you snacking, and food service, present compelling opportunities for growth in the future. Our strengths, rooted in our leading brands, our extensive network, and above all our people, give us a solid foundation for driving long-term shareholder value. With that, Victor, we're ready to take questions.

Jim Salera

analyst
#3

Hi, everyone. Morning, and thanks for the chance to ask our question. Ryals, I'd like to hear about how you're approaching pricing from here on, since in the prepared remarks you brought up, you know, a more intense promotional backdrop. Clearly, we're able to see some divergence in the share trends, and I'm curious whether part of that relates to the net price you're still realizing. Could you share any thoughts on how we ought to model the pricing lever, you know, for the back half of this year, or I suppose 4Q of this year, but then even more importantly as we head into 2027 while we, you know, sort of refine our models and consider how much of the inflation headwinds we've seen you'll be able to offset?

Ryals McMullian

executive
#4

Yes, absolutely, Jim. Appreciate the question. For sure, price is one thing we're examining. Still, I'd say that's only a portion of the picture. You know, our view is that the larger problem involves some of the shifts occurring in the category when it comes to consumer preferences, price pack architecture, which clearly carries a price component, of course, meaningful differentiation; those are the items winning in the category at present. Where we have gaps right now, though, we're closing them, as you know. In fact, we're doing so as we speak. We just relaunched our Nature's Own Small Loaf, for instance, and we have more of that arriving in 2027. I think, you know, we're taking a close look at price, promotions, promotional effectiveness, you know, using the tools at our disposal to make sure the promotions we do run are as effective as they can be. That said, the promotional environment has been quite intense. Especially this last quarter, we saw fairly intense promotional activity. Price sensitivity among consumers is definitely a factor, but it isn't the only factor.

Jim Salera

analyst
#5

So if we were to set a few, you know, guardrails around that, I mean, do you figure there's still a chance we'd see, you know, a low single-digit gain from, you know, price mix in 2027, or ought we to view it as more flattish?

Anthony Scaglione

executive
#6

Yeah, I think, you know, we aren't in a spot to discuss 2027 at this point. I think every dynamic Ryals brought up is clearly going to be a factor in where we land on a level, and it's going to be a tale of two stories, organic wheat versus traditional wheat. You know, those two are showing different cost inputs, so that is going to play a part in how we view the overall portfolio, both on the traditional loaf as well as on the organic side.

Jim Salera

analyst
#7

All right. Could I ask just one more thing regarding input costs? This earnings season we've spoken with plenty of people about rising transportation costs, so we were hoping you might help us gauge what you're seeing with your freight contracts. Perhaps you could quantify how we ought to think about that as a percentage of sales, and the size of the increase as we go forward and look toward 2027. Thank you.

Anthony Scaglione

executive
#8

Yeah; so perhaps I'll speak briefly about inflation and commodities more broadly, just to provide that context. For fiscal 2026, broadly speaking, our hedging programs benefited us. We saw commodity prices rising, particularly in the back half, year-on-year in Q3 for commodities, ingredients, packaging. On a rate basis they were fairly flat versus a year ago. Markets, while elevated during the quarter relative to 2025, our coverage and inventory gave us protection. And Q4, and that was already in our guide, so nothing new there. We factored this in already; we anticipated greater raw material inflation as coverage started to lapse, and that clearly will be an area we're devoting a lot of time to as we look at 2027, though it might be more of a first half versus second half headwind. Regarding fuel, as we said on the last call, our fuel costs, some of it is hedged, some of it we have contracted transportation costs; so while year-on-year it has gone up, we've been able to manage that either through the contracts or through the rates we've had with our transportation providers.

Scott Marks

analyst
#9

Hi there, good morning everyone. Really appreciate you taking our questions. The first item I'd like to raise: you mentioned a few of the ongoing pressures in the space and that the pace of improvement at Nature's Own has taken somewhat longer. Some of your innovation hasn't kept pace with category trends, and I realize those pay off more over the longer term. So when you look at the here and now, how are you approaching perhaps curbing some of those pressures inside your own business? I know you mentioned extensive cost controls. I'm just curious whether you could give us a sense of how you intend to tackle that and how we ought to think about those levers.

Ryals McMullian

executive
#10

Yes, absolutely. Some of those levers are already being pulled by us. We estimate a cost takeout of roughly $20 million for this year that directly addresses that issue. There are opportunities to improve procurement. There are also chances for added efficiencies in the bakeries. That's something we're always working on—greater productivity from the bakeries, keeping our stale under control. I mean, Scott, these are the everyday tactical blocking and tackling items the team works on to fight some of the headwinds we face. What matters more, though, is the focus on stabilizing our branded volume. So again, returning to those portfolio gaps we're actively filling, the relaunch of the small loaves, which incidentally also gains from the halo, so to speak, of the Nature's Own advertising campaign; the formulation is the same, clean label, non-GMO. We'll capture that halo effect. Those just relaunched. It's only been a few weeks, yet we're already seeing some very promising returns there that give us confidence we can recapture our fair share of that segment. As for the broader Nature's Own franchise, since the relaunch, we have seen share trends improving sequentially across the Nature's Own franchise. The traditional loaf, which has been the weakest part of the overall segment of the category, continues to lag behind, but even it has shown some sequential improvement; we're not getting results as fast as we'd hoped, but nevertheless, we are seeing those green shoots of improvement that give us confidence this is the right strategy, the right path forward. Our customers are excited about it. They tell us that when we join them for meetings. Of course, when your customers are behind something, that's a really good early sign you're doing the right thing. DKB, Jim asked the question a minute ago about price. I do think there is some price sensitivity with DKB, but it's a lot more than that too. I mean, as recently as Q1, DKB was up in units; this is a very recent phenomenon that has occurred. To be honest, our total share held pretty steady across the past several years right up until quite recently. There's a straight connection, in my view, between that and both the shift in share and the way consumer preferences have moved, and we're working hard to respond to those changes.

Scott Marks

analyst
#11

Got it. Thanks for all the detail there. And then maybe a second one from me: in the prepared remarks there was a mention of cooperating with bank partners to make sure there's financial flexibility for next year. I was wondering whether you could give us an update on how you're thinking about capital allocation, the dividend included, plus capital expenditures looking ahead. Thanks.

Anthony Scaglione

executive
#12

Yeah, no problem. To start, I just want to restate that we're still in compliance with every covenant and that our relationships with our bank group are very strong. With that said, we want to give the company as much flexibility as possible as we keep facing a potentially challenging environment in the year ahead, whether from a commodity standpoint, a category standpoint, or a consumer standpoint. As for 2027, we keep working on it and shaping it up from a planning perspective, and we're building in that flexibility ahead of any potential constraints that might come up. We expect to have an update on that front before year end. On your question about the dividend specifically, obviously the dividend is an important topic and a shareholder consideration, and our board reviews that policy every single quarter. We share with them the relevant items across a number of dimensions, including cash generation, our leverage profile, and capital investment; they take those elements into consideration when forming the basis of their actions, and we expect to announce whatever decision the board makes in our normal cadence following next week's board meeting.

Scott Marks

analyst
#13

Got it. Appreciate the call. I'll relay that.

Steve Powers

analyst
#14

Hey, wonderful. Thanks, and good morning to you.

Ryals McMullian

executive
#15

Hello there, Steve.

Steve Powers

analyst
#16

Hi. So you've highlighted how tough the category backdrop is, but clearly there's a share piece in there as well. Could you give us a bit more of your thinking on how you break that down between the category itself and what Flowers actually controls through improved execution, improved assortment, and so on? I'm just trying to understand better how you view those two drivers and how much control you feel you truly have over where the business goes into 2027, relative to how the category is performing.

Ryals McMullian

executive
#17

Yes. That's a good question, Steve, and I appreciate it. The category as a whole is still soft, so that's where we begin. In the quarter, category units were down nearly, I believe, nearly 3%; and when you break that apart, as we've been saying, the traditional loaf, the 20-ounce traditional loaf, is still the softest piece of the sector. Clearly, we're heavily concentrated in traditional loaf. So stabilizing it, as we've said for a number of quarters now, is our top priority. That's why we have the Nature's Own relaunch, the shift to clean label, the shift to non-GMO; we think these moves are right for the consumer, for our customers, and for our company. We're starting to see some results from that. As I mentioned, DKB is a more recent development when it comes to unit pressure. There are several reasons. Part of it is price sensitivity, but consumption issues are there as well. DKB indexes highest among high-income consumers. They're also the heaviest users of GLP-1s. Seeing some pressure there isn't terribly surprising. DKB is still holding up better among lower-income consumers than among high-income ones. I put a lot of that down to the GLP-1 drugs. We have actions in place to address it, Steve, through innovation and protein items. Closing the gap we have on sourdough has also been an issue for DKB. Our sourdough in DKB is only in California, and it's growing very, very well there. We're highly confident that it will be a very important addition to that part of the portfolio. Coming back to the 20-ounce loaf, getting it stabilized matters a great deal. While we work on that, relaunching the half loaves to capture our fair share of that segment and to help steady overall volumes is also an important piece of the picture. And remember, we're not solely a traditional loaf business; we have a very large billion-dollar food service business, and we serve private label too. Meanwhile, as we work to rebuild the branded business, we're aggressively filling volumes through new wins in food service and private label, along with wins for our branded business, since that helps offset some of the operating deleverage we've been seeing.

Steve Powers

analyst
#18

All right, that's great. Thanks very much. Anthony, you mentioned the challenging cost backdrop, especially as we look toward the first half of next year. A lot of those initiatives Ryals just described are going to need some time before they show any return in terms of volume impact. I guess, without seeking guidance, I'm just wondering how you see the first half compared with where you've placed the fourth quarter. Is the fourth quarter a sensible run rate for framing the starting point of 2027, or will the fourth quarter be a trough, with improvement beginning as the new year gets underway? It's really a question of the improvement trajectory off what hopefully is the bottom here in the back half of 2026.

Anthony Scaglione

executive
#19

Yeah, great question, Steve. From an inflationary standpoint, I'd say that for many of the commodities we're exposed to, we're seeing prices rise right now in Q4. Sequentially, assuming there isn't a significant geopolitical shift or anything like that, we expect that pressure to carry on as we think about the first half of next year, looking at it through the lens of first half versus second half. Sitting here a couple weeks ago, a couple months ago, it looked like wheat was really beginning to rally. That has come down as we look at all the data out there that we can take into consideration. It looks like there's more acreage. It looks like the geopolitical, there's something there. So there are good indicators that some relief on the inflationary side could come, but I'd say that's probably more of a second half story, just given our hedging programs, given where pricing is, more relief in the second half than the first half. So we're expecting continued pressures in the first half of next year as it relates to the inflationary side.

Steve Powers

analyst
#20

All right. That's great. I'll stop here. Thank you very much.

Ryals McMullian

executive
#21

Thank you, Steve.

Max Gumport

analyst
#22

Hey, thanks for asking. I'd like to go back to what we discussed about the balance sheet, and really I'm just trying to understand how you feel regarding the strength of your balance sheet. Clearly, you made a decisive move earlier this year when you cut the dividend, and I think that was a solid step. But with your updated outlook for 2026 and the operating conditions you expect to continue into 2027, it seems you've become somewhat stretched again when it comes to leverage. I mean, your second half EBITDA this year would suggest a leverage ratio that's very high and above your covenant. In your remarks you included commentary about working proactively with your bank partners to make sure you have plenty of financial flexibility. You also had a comment in the 10-Q about seeking an amendment to the covenants attached to your debt. I'm just trying to get a sense of how comfortable you feel about your balance sheet, and how you think about getting out of this leverage situation.

Anthony Scaglione

executive
#23

Yeah, great question. As I said earlier, we're working with our lead banks, and again, we expect an update by year-end. Based on the conversations and discussions to date, we're highly confident that we will be able to put additional relief in place, specifically addressing what we see as a potential concern in 2027 when it comes to our covenants. Those conversations are progressing well. We also have actions available to us. We're looking at our CapEx. We're looking at the investment in the business. You mentioned the dividend. We're looking at the dividend; all of these are things we take into consideration, recognizing the dividend is a board action with management input. We want to make sure that as we look at 2027, and as you recognize some of the challenges from an inflationary standpoint, we're doing everything to try to view it through the lens of how do we deleverage over time, how do we keep having the capacity to invest in the business to support our brands, recognizing that there will be some cost pressures we're going to need to deal with; we are addressing that proactively through these conversations with our banks and proactively through some of the levers we will pull in 2027 when it comes to investments and costs.

Max Gumport

analyst
#24

Great. Following up on that, I mean, you did say you're still putting money into growth. So I guess what makes you confident you can handle both at the same time, that you can bring down debt while also spending to try to lift the top line, whether that's pushing innovation forward or going after new business or putting more behind your leading brands? Why do you believe you can pull off both simultaneously, and why not just put all your focus on the balance sheet, considering where you stand right now? Thanks so much.

Anthony Scaglione

executive
#25

Yeah, I think when you get right down to it, we have to keep investing in this business. In the long run, that gives us the best shot from a top-line standpoint to win back share, to win back growth. We need to weigh that investment against the returns and against the pace of the deleveraging. That's a profile we stay mindful of, and we're balancing it across several dimensions. But to imagine we'd simply cut back on those investments near term, we have to view this as a journey spanning multiple quarters and multiple years and keep the approach balanced. We're confident that the way we'll go about it is a balanced approach.

Max Gumport

analyst
#26

All right, thank you so much.

Mitchell Pinheiro

analyst
#27

Yes. Hi there. Good morning.

Ryals McMullian

executive
#28

Morning.

Mitchell Pinheiro

analyst
#29

So I guess food service sales volume rose during the quarter, at least that's what I think I read. How does that square with the soft category growth, where the trends went beyond just the usual weakness in your traditional loaf? You had pressure from GLP-1. Is the food service business really a matter of having the right customers, or I'd just love to hear your thoughts on that.

Ryals McMullian

executive
#30

Yes, Mitch, much of the growth in food service comes from new business wins. We reorganized our sales force around food service; these days it's mostly an internal sales force, and that has been a huge benefit for us. The team has done a great job securing new business, and expanding business with current customers has also played a part in that.

Mitchell Pinheiro

analyst
#31

Moving on, promotional activity was up, but it didn't really shift volumes. Is that because the promotions are on your newer and smaller products? Smaller product lines, I mean.

Ryals McMullian

executive
#32

No, that's not really it, Mitch. Keep in mind, first of all, that base sales in this category are extremely high. So generating lifts from promotions has always been a pretty hard thing to do. I'd say our promotions in the quarter were uneven in how effective they were. Some worked better than others, that's how I'd put it. Certain activity in the mass channel, for instance, didn't do as well as what we ran with more traditional grocers. Part of that comes down to the overall price point, so in mass, for instance, the promoted price might not be low enough to drive sufficient volume. So again, as I mentioned when addressing one of the first questions on the call, we're taking a hard look at how effective our promotions are. I believe we can do even better going forward; and then, naturally, when you look at DKB in the quarter, it was clearly a disappointment for us, but I'd also point out that we were very heavy on promotion in the third quarter of last year and less heavy this year; so that played a part in some of what I'd call unexpected unit declines in the quarter. So it's more uneven than promotions simply not working across the board. That isn't the case.

Ryals McMullian

executive
#33

Hey, Victor, thanks. I just want to say thanks to everyone for taking the time today to join us for questions. We really appreciate your interest in our company. As usual, we look forward to talking with you next quarter. Take care.

Operator

operator
#34

I appreciate everyone for joining us on today's call. That brings the program to an end. You're welcome to disconnect now. Have a wonderful day, everyone.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Flowers Foods, Inc. transcript — plus 133,000+ transcripts from 7,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Flowers Foods, Inc. earnings transcripts and 133,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $39.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.

More tools for stock research

OptionsBell: an unusual options activity scanner that tracks options flow across all US stocks and emails you when large trades appear in Flowers Foods, Inc. or any ticker on your watchlist.

StockMarketScan: a stock screener with alerts: 24 pre-built screens refreshed every 5 minutes, watchlists and email notifications. Both offer API and MCP access and fair monthly pricing.