Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
August 31, 2021
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Operator
operatorHello, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to Futu Holdings Second Quarter 2021 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Today's conference call is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the conference over to your host for today's conference call, Daniel Yuan, Chief Staff and Head of IR at Futu. Please go ahead, sir.
Daniel Yuan
executiveThanks, operator, and thank you for joining us today to discuss our second quarter 2021 earnings results. Joining me on the call today are Mr. Leaf Li, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Arthur Chen, Chief Financial Officer; and Robin Xu, Senior Vice President. As a reminder, today's call may include forward-looking statements, which represent the company's belief regarding future events, which, by their nature, are not certain and are outside of the company's control. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties. We caution you that a number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. For more information about the potential risks and uncertainties, please refer to the company's filings with the SEC, including its registration statement. So with that, I will now turn the call over to Leaf. Leaf will make his comments in Chinese, and I will translate.
Leaf Li
executive[Foreign Language]
Daniel Yuan
executiveHello, everyone. Thank you for joining the earnings call today. We achieved a milestone of 1 million paying clients as of the end of second quarter, translating into a 230% year-over-year growth. Net addition was 211,000, our second best quarter in history. Our relentless pursuit of premier user experience and brand image rewarded us with yet another quarter of rapid client-based expansion over 50% organically required paying clients, and a high-paying client retention rate of 97.8%.
Leaf Li
executive[Foreign Language]
Daniel Yuan
executiveGoing forward, our key growth strategies would be to defend and expand our leading position in Hong Kong, further take market share in Singapore and drive self-clearing in the U.S. to improve monetization and operational flexibility. In the second quarter, Singapore contributed nearly half of our new paying clients. Singapore represents a blue ocean opportunity, and we will leverage marketing and word of mouth referral to further capture user mind share. In the U.S., our self-clearing initiative reported accelerating progress as we now have migrated about 350 U.S. stocks to our proprietary clearance system. We are targeting to self-clear 50% of U.S. stocks by the end of this year.
Leaf Li
executive[Foreign Language]
Daniel Yuan
executiveOur total client assets were HKD 503 billion at quarter end, representing 253% growth on a year-over-year basis and 9% growth on a quarter-over-quarter basis, despite challenging mark-to-market impact. Average client assets came down sequentially to HKD 503,000 as paying client acquisitions in new markets picked up and drags average balance.
Leaf Li
executive[Foreign Language]
Daniel Yuan
executiveTotal trading volume was up 104% year-over-year to HKD 1.3 trillion, of which U.S. trading constituted approximately 64%. Trading volume came down meaningfully from the first quarter due to a much lower turnover rate across different trading markets and client cohorts. We have seen our clients stay on the sideline to mid-market uncertainty, and we expect our trading volume growth in the coming quarters should be driven mostly by expansion in client counts and assets rather than trading turnover should current market environment persist.
Leaf Li
executive[Foreign Language]
Daniel Yuan
executiveOur wealth management business, Money Plus, has been relatively immune to the monthly downturn, although the Hong Kong IPOs at the end of the quarter took away some of the assets accumulated over the quarter, and we expect steady asset balance growth in coming quarters. As of June 30, over 74,000 clients helped wealth management position and total client assets in Wealth Management were HKD 13.8 billion, up 59% year-over-year and 5% quarter-over-quarter. Money Plus established new partnerships with 7 reputable asset managers in the quarter, including Goldman Sachs, UBS and Principal. We also became the exclusive distributor for China AMC's Select Greater China Technology Fund, the only China technology-focused mutual fund in Hong Kong. We continue to innovate on product features. We added fund portfolio rebalancing function and upgraded the functionality of money market funds, where clients can now opt to automatically subscribing the deep money market funds based on their idle cash and margin balance position.
Leaf Li
executive[Foreign Language]
Daniel Yuan
executiveOur enterprise business, Futu I&E, has 186 IPO and IR clients as well as 263 ESOP solutions clients as of quarter end, representing 191% and 153% year-over-year growth, respectively. We continue to enhance the value proposition of our ESOP business by providing an end-to-end one stop solution and various value-added services to the management team and employees of our corporate clients. Our experience in handling complicated ESOP clients in a scale across different geographies helps us continue to win over large-scale corporate clients.
Leaf Li
executive[Foreign Language]
Daniel Yuan
executiveDespite low paying client attrition, we're encouraged to see robust user engagement data as average DAU remained above 1 million and daily average user time spend hovered around 30 minutes on each trading day in June. In an effort to drive user engagement, we continue to enrich content in our social community by attracting different stakeholders and improve content recommendation. As of quarter end, over 600 companies have set up enterprise accounts in our social community to interact with retail investors, providing our users invaluable data to facilitate the investment decision making.
Leaf Li
executive[Foreign Language]
Daniel Yuan
executiveNext, I'd like to invite our CFO to discuss our financial performance.
Arthur Chen
executiveThanks Leaf and Daniel. Please allow me to walk you through our financial performance in the second quarter. All numbers are in Hong Kong dollars unless otherwise noted. Total revenue was HKD 1.78 billion, an increase of 129% from the second quarter of 2020 and a decrease of 28% sequentially. Brokerage commission and handling charge income was HKD 798 million, up 95% year-over-year and down 40% Q-on-Q. The Q-on-Q decline was mainly due to a sharp drop in trading turnover amidst dampened market sentiment from about 6x in the first quarter to 3x in the second quarter, to be specific. This was partially offset by higher client assets and a slightly sequential uptick in blended commission rate to 6.1 basis points. Interest income was HKD 610 million, an increase of 194% year-over-year and a decrease of 7% Q-on-Q. The year-over-year increase in interest income was mainly driven by higher margin financing balance, higher securities borrowing and a lending service income as well as higher IPO financing income. The mild quarterly decline can be mainly attributed to a reduction in securities borrowing income as the market value of U.S. stock borrowing and borrowing rate on store sequentially. Other income was HKD 169 million, up 141% year-over-year and down 24% Q-on-Q. The year-over-year growth and the Q-on-Q decline can both be attributed to changes in our IPO subscription service charge income and currency exchange service income as market conditions fluctuated. In terms of cost, our total costs was HKD 279 million, an increase of 81% from the same quarter last year and a decrease of 37% from last quarter. Brokerage commission and handling charge expenses was HKD 145 million, an increase of 89% year-over-year. This increase was roughly in line with our changes of our brokerage commission and handling charge income. Interest income was HKD 80 million, up 98% year-over-year. The growth was primarily due to: number one, high costs associated with our securities borrowing and the lending business; and then number two, higher margin financing interest expenses driven by higher margin financing balance partially offset by lower cost of funding. Processing and servicing costs were HKD 54 million, up 48% year-over-year. The increase was primarily due to the increase in cloud service fees to process higher number of concurrent trades. As a result, total gross profit was HKD 1.3 billion, an increase of 143% from HKD 534 million in the same period in 2020. Gross profit margin increased from 77.6% in the second quarter of 2020 to 82.3% this quarter, thanks to high operating leverage as a result of our larger business scale. Total operating expenses was up 145% year-over-year and 32% Q-on-Q to HKD 647 million, over 40% of which was related to our international initiatives in Singapore and the U.S. market. R&D expenses was HKD 173 million, an increase of 48% year-over-year and a 26% Q-on-Q, roughly in line with our R&D headcount increase. We continue to invest in our U.S. clearing capabilities and have dedicated around 40% of our R&D personnel to product development in Singapore and in the U.S. to drive a smoother and customized product experience for local users. Selling and marketing expenses were HKD 377 million, up 292% year-over-year and 37% Q-on-Q. The increase was primarily due to higher branding and marketing spending especially in the international markets to cultivate brand image and acquire new clients. In the second quarter of 2021, over half our sales -- selling and marketing expenses were devoted to the overseas market. G&A expenses were HKD 97 million, an increase of 91% year-over-year and 24% Q-on-Q due to increase in headcount for general and administrative personnel. Our effective tax rate increased from 9% in the first quarter to 14.5% in the second quarter since our total tax credit arising from accumulated loss in the Mainland business has been fully utilized so far, and our net revenue derived from our U.S. stock trading decline in the second quarter. Going forward, we expect our effective tax rate to be in the range of 12% to 14%. As a result, our net income for the quarter increased by 126% year-over-year and decreased by 54% Q-on-Q to HKD 534 million. That concludes our prepared remarks. We now like to open the call to questions. Operator, please go ahead.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] Your first question is from Katherine Liu of Morgan Stanley.
Xinhe Liu
analyst[Foreign Language] I will translate for myself. So I have 2 questions. First is, can the management please give us some guidance in terms of the third quarter-to-date results, including client acquisition pace, AUM per capita, turnover velocity, client acquisition costs and maybe some operating expenses growth rate? And second, in light of the regulatory uncertainties regarding restructured companies and ADRs, does the company have any plans regarding Hong Kong listing?
Arthur Chen
executiveThank you, Katherine. This is Arthur. I will take these questions. First of all, just quarter-to-date, I just want to share some color. Definitely, I think the market fluctuations quarter-to-date have some negative impact on our average client assets. So far, I think roughly our average client assets will be down around in the range of 10% to 20%, mainly attributed to the market's -- market loss. But we are very confident because even quarter-to-date, almost every day, we still see meaningful net asset inflows in terms of the wealth accumulation into 2 platforms. Therefore, I do think once the market is back to normal, these market loss or gain will become to the average number. And in terms of the client trading velocity, we do expect trading velocity has some rebound in July and August, given the market, especially high tech stocks have meaningful setbacks, we do see some cushions from the retail investors. And unlike the situation in second quarter, many investors just on the sideline, we do see some participations in the third quarter. So if based on the current run rate, I would expect in terms of top line, we may see some sequential Q-on-Q increase in the third quarter compared with the second quarter. In terms of the client acquisition costs, I think on the absolute amount levels, this marketing campaign spending will be roughly in line with what we did in the second quarter, but definitely supply acquisition speed will slow down due to the market conditions. So this will all affect the denominator numbers, and we will left out -- our actual number have certain increase in the first quarter compared with the second quarter. For your second question, I think, number one, our VIE structure is slightly different for many -- compared with many Chinese ADR companies, because most of us our revenue is now derived from the offshore, essentially we do not generate any revenues from our VIE structures. So even there will be some new regulations on the VIE structure, I do not expect that it will have some meaningful impact operational wise or financial wise to our business. And definitely, we have noted some regional trends in the capital markets, and we are actively conducting quality research and evaluation in this regard. We will make a very comprehensive assessment to ensure that decisions should maximize our shareholders as the long-term interest is made. Thank you.
Operator
operatorYour next question comes from Ethan Wang from CLSA.
Yushen Wang
analyst[Foreign Language] I have 2 questions surrounding the Chinese ADR delisting risk. The first one, I was wondering whether management can share some color on current percentage of Chinese ADRs as a percentage of the total trading volume of the U.S. stocks on Futu? And the second one is if the risk of delisting for the Chinese ADRs really happens, then these companies may very likely to convert the Hong Kong listings into primary ones. That means they will be included in a connect scheme, which means that China send back to country those stocks through online China brokers. Does that mean a very big risk for your firm? So how does management look at this?
Arthur Chen
executiveOkay. I will take the first question and will leave my colleagues Robin and Leaf for the second question. In terms of our current U.S. stock trading, essentially ADR just accounts for a very small part. If we do some back testing, around 15% of our U.S. stock tradings belong to these Chinese ADRs. Robin or Leaf?
Leaf Li
executive[Foreign Language]
Daniel Yuan
executiveWell, we think the return of China ADRs back to Hong Kong could be a structural trend, although we don't really take a stance on how the regulations will evolve and the Hong Kong IPOs generally have very high monetization potentials. And we generate a pretty sizable percentage of our revenue from the IPO subscription and margin financing interest. And also in Hong Kong, there's more friendly trading hours for our clients. And also just to add on to your other point about converting to primary listing, well, we don't think there is -- the onshore brokers will necessarily pose a great threat to our business. Because a lot of the popular the Chinese companies worked out in Hong Kong right now are already access accessible to our Mainland Chinese investors through Stock Connect, for example, Tencent. But some of these large tech companies still account for a majority of our asset balance in Hong Kong stocks. And in comparison to trading through a Stock Connect, trading directly in the Hong Kong market offers more flexible and more favorable trading hours and trading time. So like if Mainland China has a corporate holiday, it does not affect our trading hours in Hong Kong. And also, there's a lot more flexibility of our margin financing and there is a wider selection of stock that you can invest in. So we don't believe that a number of Chinese companies converting from secondary listing to primary listing will change our competitive edge in this market.
Leaf Li
executive[Foreign Language]
Daniel Yuan
executiveAnd we also have a very differentiated client cohort as compared to some of the onshore brokers. So we don't think our competitive advantage will be diluted should this -- should consensus actually realize it.
Operator
operatorYour next question comes from the line of Zoey Zong from Jefferies.
Yi Zong
analyst[Foreign Language] This is Zoey from Jefferies, and I have 2 questions. My first question is regarding the tax rate. As we have noted that the effective cost rate for Q2 was 14.5%, which is much higher than the previous quarter, I wonder what's the reason for the increase? And how should we estimate this number going forward? And my second question is, we know that Hong Kong exchange plans to adopt a T+2 settlement sample instead of the current T+5 in the first quarter 2022. I wonder how should we think about the impact on our IPO financing business?
Arthur Chen
executiveThank you, Zoey. I will answer the first question and I will leave the second question to Leaf. Actually, I had mentioned this in our opening remarks. You are right, our effective tax rate increased from 9% in the first quarter to 14.5% in the second quarter. The reason actually comes from 2 thoughts. Number one is our tax credit arising from historical cumulative loss in the China operations has been fully utilized. So this is a similar effect. And secondly is our net revenue derived from our U.S. stock trading belong to these Mainland individuals. Actually, we can make our offshore claims in Hong Kong, but their U.S. stock trading volume in the second quarter declined, therefore, we had some temporary impact in the second quarter arising from the second reason. Going forward, we expect our effect tax rate will be in the range of 12% to 14%.
Leaf Li
executive[Foreign Language]
Daniel Yuan
executiveSure. So the IPO financing income accounted for about 4% of our revenue in the first half of this year, and contribution was less than 6% in 2020. So if we were to assume that the settlement period goes from T+5 to T+2, from a static point of view, this will have only a 2% to 3% negative impact on our top line, which we think is manageable.
Leaf Li
executive[Foreign Language]
Daniel Yuan
executiveWell, secondly, a lot of the IPOs subscription period kind of overlapped with each other. So we believe some of the needs for IPO subscription happens to be subdued under the current kind of regulations. And we think this could change after the forum, so especially when the markets are performing really well and there are a lot of IPOs happening at the same time, having a T+2 settlement period can increase the capital efficiency of our clients. And therefore will potentially help increase their engagement in this IPO subscription process. And also, we understand that the regulations are not only regarding shortening the settlement period, but also may touch on avoiding the retail clients from subscribing to IPOs through multiple brokers. And we believe that the IPO financing income makes up a very significant income for a lot of mid- to small-sized brokers. So this policy could actually contribute to industry consolidation and direct a lot of these retail investors to platforms like Futu that have better user experience and more capital for them to use during the IPOs.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from Hanyang Wang from 86Research.
Hanyang Wang
analyst[Foreign Language] I will translate my question. Congratulations on a great quarter. I have the following question on the IPO business. So with uncertainties for China ADR IPO, as rather recent slowdown for Hong Kong IPOs impacted our ESOP business and will that also impact our user acquisition in Mainland China also ESOP?
Arthur Chen
executiveThank you. Let me take this question. I think, number one, the slowdown of Chinese companies overseas ADR IPO is just a temporary situation. We understand many Chinese companies are in the sidelines, and that they are waiting for more clarity in terms of the regulations from China and also from the U.S. regulator down the road. Therefore, I think the impact will be very short term. And having said that, we also see, as Leaf mentioned before, we see more and more listed companies and also pre-IPO companies will consider Hong Kong as their primary listing stage rather than the U.S. in the past. We do have a very strong edge in Hong Kong market, given Hong Kong is our home base. Therefore, we do think client acquisition through the ESOP, through the IPO will continue. Just to give you some breakdown in terms of our current client acquisition channels, organic already accounts for over 15%. If we just calculate ESOP channel combined with this group account opening, then we will just account for around 10% of our total new paying clients income every quarter. So I think the impact is still manageable.
Operator
operatorWe have another question from the line of Katherine Liu from Morgan Stanley.
Xinhe Liu
analyst[Foreign Language] I will translate for myself. Just wondering, I understand that you're in a new market, initial monetization may be to a less important versus client market share. But then just wondering has the management considered increasing the monetization for the Singapore market? Whether it will be some guidance from companies or some hints from companies or it will be a natural result as clients' assets increase on the platform?
Arthur Chen
executiveSure, Katherine, let me give you some color in terms of our client profile in Singapore. I think in terms of age and their trading velocity, this population is very similar to what we see in Hong Kong markets. The average age is around 30 years old and they do trade a lot, particularly for the U.S. markets. Now the average client assets in Singapore is around SGD 6,000. Of course, it is relatively low compared with the average assets what we witness in China and in Hong Kong. But encouragingly, I think if we look at total basis, the new clients we acquired in March and April, we have total assets already almost doubled in the past 4 to 5 months. So back to your question, I think, number one, definitely we think the nature of our business is just more like a low lying snowball. We are very happy to go along with our clients in their investment journeys. We believe as time goes by, their average assets will become bigger and bigger. Number two, definitely, we will have more service offering, more product offerings in the pipeline. Hopefully, we will launch more business in the coming 2 quarters. For instance, we will provide Singapore clients to participate in the Hong Kong IPO retail tranche. And not to mention, we will also expand our wealth management product offering, currently just offering to the Mainland and Hong Kong people, to the Singapore local residents as well. Therefore, I think as we provide more and more products and service, we will find more monetization areas to enhance our ARPU.
Operator
operatorAs there are no further questions at this time, I would now like to hand the conference back to Daniel for closing remarks.
Daniel Yuan
executiveThat concludes our call today. On behalf of the Futu management team, I would like to thank you for joining us today. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me or any of our Investor Relations representatives. Thank you, and goodbye.
Operator
operatorThank you. That does conclude our conference for today. Thank you for participating. You may now all disconnect.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Futu Holdings Limited transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Futu Holdings Limited earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.