Global Payments Inc. (GPN) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

February 25, 2021

New York Stock Exchange US Financials Financial Services conference_presentation 41 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Vasundhara Govil

analyst
#1

Good morning, everyone, and welcome back to the third and final day of KBW's 11th Annual Fintech Payments Conference. I'm Vasu Govil. I'm one of the analysts covering the payments and processing space here at KBW. Over the past 2 days, we've heard from a number of executives across the fintech and payments space, and we'll be continuing today with a full lineup of fireside chats and panels. To kick things off this morning, I'm pleased to be joined by Paul Todd, who is the Senior Executive Vice President and CFO of Global Payments. As many of you know, Paul was also the CFO at Global Systems Services before the company merged with Global Payments in 2019. And this is his fourth time joining us for the conference. So thank you, Paul, for taking the time to join us today.

Paul Todd

executive
#2

Thanks for having me. I really appreciate it.

Vasundhara Govil

analyst
#3

Excellent.

Vasundhara Govil

analyst
#4

So to start off, I know everyone is probably looking for some color on how volumes and revenues are trending quarter to date. Any update you can offer us on that versus the color that you gave at earnings?

Paul Todd

executive
#5

Yes. So maybe I'll start just from a merchant volume picture, and then we'll kind of maybe walk through the businesses. As we said on the call, we were very pleased from a merchant volume standpoint that our January volumes were better than our December volumes and that our December volumes were better than the November volumes. So we were pleased that, that kind of slow grind back to positivity has continued. Obviously, when you look at different kind of verticals, there's movements there. But when you look at it on a wholesome basis, we're pleased with that trajectory, and that's kind of the trajectory that we've used as part of our guidance. So overall, we've been pleased with the volume picture at a topical level. When we look at our kind of merchant businesses from just a revenue standpoint, as we highlighted on our call, our integrated business has really been our bright spot of growth, growing both in the fourth quarter. And as well as we talked about Heartland, albeit small, also grew in the fourth quarter. So even with kind of the backdrop of the volumes, we were able to get positive revenue growth in those 2 key businesses and even in some of our vertical market businesses, AdvancedMD being the highlight there. And so that's kind of, from a merchant standpoint, what the growth and volume picture looks like. As we move over to our issuing business, we talked about the growth that we had there. If you take out the commercial card business, the slight growth that we had there in the first quarter and then really from a business and consumer solutions standpoint, that grew throughout the pandemic. So that kind of gives you a feel, both from the volume as well as kind of from a revenue standpoint. And then as I said, I mean, those kind of trajectories and what we've seen has been the underpinning of our guidance. And from a kind of a phasing standpoint next year, we've got these comparative dynamics in Q1 that presents a more muted picture on growth in Q1. And then, obviously, the opposite happens in Q2, where you have the positive comparative dynamics and then our expectation is kind of more normalized growth picture for the businesses in the back half of the year.

Vasundhara Govil

analyst
#6

That's helpful color. So I guess just going a little high level, you are in a fast delivering high single to low double-digit revenue growth before the pandemic hit. And the pandemic has brought about many changes, some which are positive for the industry, like higher e-commerce penetration, but there are also some negatives like small businesses getting really severely impacted. So at a high level, as we come out of the pandemic, do you feel like your growth algorithm has shifted in any way? What are some of the areas where you're confident about making a full recovery and perhaps even doing better and if there are any areas where there could be some risk to what the future could look like?

Paul Todd

executive
#7

Sure. So yes, the pandemic did change some behaviors. I think it pulled forward some dynamics that kind of lend to our strengths and lend where we've been positioning the business for several years around tech enablement. And so if we think just at maybe the highest level, the transition from cash to electronic payments, I think, accelerated in the pandemic. And I think that will be kind of a permanent kind of shift there. And so that clearly is one. You mentioned e-commerce and omni and kind of the buying characteristics that I think will be a permanent shift. And certainly, we've seen that kind of additive growth in that channel of our business. And we think that the growth trajectory of that will have a more permanent nature to it because a lot of those buying behaviors changed and a lot of the businesses changed their whole delivery apparatus to enable that buying experience to be superior. So we think that, that will have more permanency to it. Nothing's changed about our growth targets. Clearly, I think some of the mix characteristics, like the e-comm omni, will have a more pronounced kind of impact. But nothing's changed about our overall kind of growth targets or growth trajectories that we're seeing. If I had to say what's one area that may not come back online as fast, I think there's probably some question around business travel and how that looks, certainly more in the shorter term. And so, obviously, that has some impact on our commercial card business and our issuing business. But we like the shift that occurred during the pandemic because it favored our tech-enabled strategies. And certainly, I think some of the growth that we saw around sales and some of the things that we did on our merchant side, I think, speaks to that.

Vasundhara Govil

analyst
#8

And would you say that travel is a pretty big chunk of the commercial card business?

Paul Todd

executive
#9

Yes. On the issuing side, corporate travel is a big component of that spend because so much of it is just kind of corporate spend on cards and so much of corporate spend on cards is travel. And that's been the headwind that we've had in that business is that, that had -- and particularly in a Q1 aspect, that had a very strong Q1 of last year. And so kind of from a comparative standpoint, that's an additional headwind for us. But the commercial card business is 20% roughly of our issuing business. So it's not a huge piece of the business, and transactions are only a subset of that revenue picture there. But that's the one that if you were trying to say what is something that probably doesn't maybe come back online as fast as other things, that might be one of the areas that doesn't.

Vasundhara Govil

analyst
#10

Got it. So I guess, delving a little bit deeper into the merchant business then. On the recent earnings call, you guys called out that the merchant ID count was actually up year-on-year, which I thought was really impressive given the environment that we're in and you're exported as small businesses. But can you dive into that a little bit? How have you been able to achieve that, what attrition looks like, what new sales, how they sort of come about?

Paul Todd

executive
#11

Sure. And to be honest, we've kind of talked about it for the last several quarters around the success we've had on the sales front and particularly on the integrated side. We've also highlighted, certainly, we talked about it on the last call around the sales success on the Heartland side. And so that has then resulted in the mid count commentary that we gave. Obviously, mid count is only one kind of volume metric, but it is an important metric from a standpoint of kind of the base. And I would say that a lot of that is driven because we've got more products to sell than we've ever had in our merchant segment. And those products kind of cut across our businesses. And those are more tech-enabled products that have also been -- if you look at kind of the buying behavior there, that tech enablement in the pandemic has probably had a premium on it. Well, definitely it has a premium on it. And so that, once again, it goes back to my earlier comment around that has kind of played into the strength of the way we've been making our investments on the tech-enabled side over the last several years. And I think that the comments that we made around merchant ID is just one measure of that success.

Vasundhara Govil

analyst
#12

Got it. And then I guess delving a little bit more into the tech-enabled businesses, you were one of the leaders in integrated payments while you make the APT and PayPros acquisitions, which was, I guess, 6 to 8 years ago. And fast forward to today, there are many more players that are offering integrated payments, both large-scale players, and then you also have big host sort of niche vertically focused providers. So can you talk a little bit about what innings are we in with merchants adopting integrated payments? And is the growth opportunity still as attractive today? And with the increased competition, sort of, what are you seeing on the revenue share economics? And how is that trending?

Paul Todd

executive
#13

Sure. So it's a good question. And you're right. We were one of the first movers in any meaningful way in the integrated space. And I would say, to some degree, that first-mover advantage has allowed us to have some of the success that we've had because we were able to build out scale and differentiation and the capabilities there to be successful. And that has continued, obviously, through the pandemic with the growth that we've seen in that area. I would still say we're in the more earlier innings of the game there. We certainly are very early when you look at it on a global basis. But in the U.S., I'd still characterize it more in the earlier innings than in the later innings. And as it relates to kind of penetration and upside, I think we see a good runway of growth there, both in the U.S. and then also what we're going to be able to do to leverage our international footprint as we move some of these capabilities outside of the U.S. I maybe use one vertical, dental, as an example. We -- that's probably one of our most penetrated verticals. And if you looked at maybe our market share in that might be 25%. And so there's no obvious reason as to why we wouldn't be able to move that to a 40% or 50% kind of penetration. And that's just one of the 70 verticals that we're in. So when I talk about kind of the upside or the runway for growth, I look kind of at one there and see even though we have very good success there, there's good growth in that vertical. And then you kind of parlay that around the multiple different verticals and then layer on top of that the international side. And that's where I see the opportunity for growth, and that's why we see this as a strong double-digit growth business. As it relates to the competitive dynamic, there isn't anything unique, I would call out there. Obviously, it's been competitive for many years now. And so it's much like the rest of our businesses. They're competitive. But at the end of the day, better technology and better execution and an overall better value proposition wins. And you have to have the adequate kind of scale to participate and kind of win in these businesses. And based on our kind of first-mover advantage as well as the things we've done on top of that, that's the position that we're in.

Vasundhara Govil

analyst
#14

And I mean, I guess, would you say there are certain verticals where the competition is higher with so many different providers and some that -- where you probably see more greenfield opportunities still?

Paul Todd

executive
#15

That's correct. I mean, clearly, certain verticals, restaurant is one and others that are kind of more tenured in this kind of space, obviously, have kind of more certainly entrenched competition as well as more competition than maybe newer verticals. I would say each one of the verticals kind of has their own unique dynamics to them, depending on the players that are there today, depending on the kind of the pivot that the industry might be going through from a delivery standpoint or a software enablement standpoint. So it's really hard to kind of generalize across. But when we kind of look across the 70-plus verticals and our 1,400 plus partners, that's where we are optimistic around the growth characteristics going forward.

Vasundhara Govil

analyst
#16

I want to take a minute before I ask my next question to sort of point the audience. If you have any questions, on the top right-hand side corner of your screen, there is a button that says ask a question. So please click on that and type in your question, and I will do my best to ask Paul. I guess moving on to sort of the vertical market software business. My understanding is that a majority of it today is still monetized through software revenues. So can you talk a little bit about how much is software versus payments monetization and how you expect that to evolve over time?

Paul Todd

executive
#17

Yes. And kind of much like the last kind of question, it's hard to generalize. But I would say that we kind of are across a spectrum there. So if you take maybe our Xenial business in our restaurant area, we have a very small percentage of that revenue coming from payments. So it's very underpenetrated relative to the opportunity set. And that would be kind of on the more underpenetrated side of the spectrum. And then if you kind of take the other maybe side or touch that business, has probably 20%, 30% maybe even 40% kind of penetration from a revenue standpoint of payments revenue in that business, just as kind of 2 markers. And other businesses kind of fall into a spectrum there. And I would say that one of the things that we like around the vertical markets business is that there's this payment kind of penetration upside when we make an acquisition there. One of the characteristics is we want to make sure that there's plenty of kind of upside, additive kind of growth that we can bring to that offering from a payment solutions standpoint. And so clearly, that kind of exists in the portfolio today. And we're very bullish kind of on the opportunity to continue that further penetration. Going back to even Xenial. We, today, have an offering that kind of bundles the software with payments and have had some success with that, even though it's still in the early stages. And so, yes, it's an evolving kind of picture there, but it's one that's additive to our base growth rate. And it's one that we've got kind of a good success kind of track record with, and it's one that you'll see us continue to kind of execute against as we move forward.

Vasundhara Govil

analyst
#18

And what would you say is sort of the catalyst for a client to also sort of start using your payment services versus just the software? Like is there a particular catalyst that you look for and that will kind of move along that penetration?

Paul Todd

executive
#19

There wouldn't be one single catalyst I would highlight there. Once again, it kind of depends on the industry. It kind of depends on the overall value proposition. It kind of depends as well on kind of the payment acceptance embedded in the end user and how that's integrated or not integrated today. So there isn't kind of one catalyst. I would say that the ability to kind of own the software and have that kind of payment apparatus in a seamless kind of offering is critical. And that's why we feel like kind of owning that software in certain of these verticals is a critical element of encapturing the payment economics as well. But the line between kind of software and payments in certain verticals is more blurred than it is in other verticals and in those verticals. That's why we like to own the software where we're able to make sure that there's both of those kind of revenue dynamics in that relationship and not just either/or.

Vasundhara Govil

analyst
#20

Got it. I have a couple of questions from clients here. So I guess the first one, just on sort of the competitive environment versus the likes of Square and Clover and Toast, sort of what are you seeing in your potential to win business against some of those names on the small business side?

Paul Todd

executive
#21

Yes. So we're very pleased with -- and I think it goes back to how we started. When we talked about the sales success that we've had, particularly on the Heartland side, where that would be more small and medium-sized kind of focus there, we've been very pleased through the pandemic around the sales success. I would highlight Vital, our Vital offering there, particularly if you're talking about Clover or Square from a product standpoint and the product capabilities that we have there that then marry into the overall products that we have from a bigger kind of global perspective as being a winning formula as it relates to the sales there. So nothing's unique or anything that I would call out on the competitive dynamic. It's -- as I said kind of earlier, it's always been a very competitive landscape, and it will continue to be. And at the end of the day, product, technology, service, great sales execution are all the key components around winning in the marketplace.

Vasundhara Govil

analyst
#22

Got it. And one more from the audience. I guess, just given some of the severe weather we've had in certain parts of the country, kind of what your exposure is there and if that impacted volume and how to think about that as we think about your guidance for the year?

Paul Todd

executive
#23

Yes. So -- I mean clearly, there's always an impact when you have kind of severe weather. I think it kind of goes back to a little bit what we talked about on our earnings call that while we project a kind of a trend moving forward, we also said we don't project it to be totally linear because there will be unknowns and good things and kind of bad things. And so weather fits into that category of not being totally linear. So it's something that you just manage through, and there wouldn't be anything unique I would call out there.

Vasundhara Govil

analyst
#24

Got it. So I guess my last one on the margin business, just the sort of merchant acquiring journeys that you've had. This has been a strength for Global Payments historically. Are there other incremental opportunities for you to work with banks, larger banks globally?

Paul Todd

executive
#25

Well, sure. And that has been one of the success factors that we've had around the globe moving outside of the U.S. is partnering with high-quality financial institutions where there's ingrained relationships and coverage in a marketplace. And our track record of success is very strong there. And I think that's a very strong testament when we talk with new financial institutions around partnerships is pointing them to the success that we've had around the globe. And I think just this last year was another example of not only entering kind of new partnerships but building on the ones we have. And so the additional purchase that we made with Caixa earlier this -- or at the beginning of the fourth quarter of last year. Our MoneyToPay joint venture and our Business and Consumer Solutions segment is another example of kind of building on an established relationship. So when you look at of the issuing business and the deep kind of financial institution relationships that we have there as well as what we have from a legacy global standpoint, that dialogue is something that we continue to have. And we look forward to being able to potentially have another meaningful joint venture at some point with a financial institution partner. And I think our track record, if we did something like that, would speak to the potential success there.

Vasundhara Govil

analyst
#26

Great color. So I guess the AWS and the Google partnerships, that's what I wanted to talk about a little bit next. Two very interesting partnerships with leading technology players, both signed over the last 6 months or so. Can you give us a little bit of background of how they came to be?

Paul Todd

executive
#27

Well, sure. They both have a little bit of a different history origin to them. I think the end benefits actually kind of are somewhat similar, although have different characteristics to them. But on the issuing side with AWS, for really a year plus before the merger, our TSYS issuing business had been doing a lot of analytical work around modernizing the TS2 platform. And that was more around the architecture and looking at the possibilities there. I think what accelerated to some degree was after the merger and the cloud-native kind of push that Global Payments has had kind of sped up to some degree the timing of that initiative. And when we looked at who was the best partner for the issuing business, we were putting a premium on who is the best technological partner to be able to partner with around building the application, who is going to be the best partner that had the scale to be able to process our platform given the incredible kind of size of volumes that go through that issuing platform. And then it kind of almost equally as important was who is the best kind of distribution partner for financial institutions that we didn't already have relationships with, particularly around the globe, so the whole distribution aspect of the partnership. And Amazon was that best partner. So we're thrilled to get that relationship, but it did kind of start before the merger, and it culminated in the announcement. I think on the Google merchant side, there's been a longstanding kind of relationship with Google on our merchant side. They've been a great partner with us from a technological standpoint for years. And so from there, kind of the more history was building on that established partnership that exists but also had the element of who is going to be the best to be able to help us with that transition and who provided also the best products and distribution for our small and medium-sized businesses, and that's what Google offered. So we couldn't be more pleased to partner with 2 of the leading technology companies to help us, not only on the technological side but on the distribution and product side as well.

Vasundhara Govil

analyst
#28

Got it. So -- and clearly, like you said, one, they both add distribution. One also increases your addressable market significantly. How should we think about what these deals can add to your long-term growth rates in the respective segment?

Paul Todd

executive
#29

Yes. Well, as I said, they both today provide for additive distribution that we wouldn't have had, had we not done these deals. Certainly, maybe over some time period, you'd be able to kind of reach the same kind of solution set of customers, but certainly not with kind of the same way that you're going to be able to do it with the partners like these. So I would say that in both cases, there's an additive growth element related to these partnerships. And certainly, obviously, these things take time, particularly on the issuing side. This is kind of a multiyear kind of aspect around bringing the platform to market. We've already had some success on the sales front, even while we're building the platform there. But these things take time, but it is additive. These are, particularly on the issuing side, these are areas we would not have been able to go to on our own just given the heavy kind of tech footprint that we needed to do that. And then on the Google side, clearly, from a distribution standpoint, from a product standpoint, there's products now that we're going to be able to sell to our small and medium-sized businesses that we didn't have in our product solution set. And so those are kind of all additive kind of components, and it's why we were so pleased to kind of get both of these deals to really enhance the distribution capabilities with these partners as well as kind of provide more products and kind of a higher stickiness factor with our customers because of this -- of these 2 relationships.

Vasundhara Govil

analyst
#30

And as we think about the economic model that you have with these 2 partners, particularly on the Google side because that's a newer relationship, is that -- is the way to think about it is that they're like a similar to an ISV partner for you where there's a revenue share that happens? Or is it a different type of model?

Paul Todd

executive
#31

Yes. I wouldn't necessarily characterize an ISV as much as I would just more of a partnership. So there are revenue characteristics there that are part of both of these arrangements. But not as much like you would see in kind of the ISV. That's kind of a different partnership kind of construct than we have with these. These are more enterprise-wide partnerships that have obviously a tech kind of component to them where we have savings that we're going to get on the technology side but then also a distribution and kind of revenue component as well.

Vasundhara Govil

analyst
#32

Got it. So I guess digging a little bit more on the issuing side of the business then. I think the stat that you gave us recently on the earnings call was that you've had 36 competitive wins globally over the last 18 months. Is that an inflection in your win rate versus history? Just taking into account the size of some of these deals. And what's sort of enabling that win rate?

Paul Todd

executive
#33

Yes. So -- well, maybe I'll take the second part of your question first. On the enablement side, clearly, the winning formula in issuing has been the same for many years now. And that is what's the best technology, what's the best kind of service apparatus? And then what's kind of, from an execution standpoint, what's the kind of best execution model there is. And that's been our winning formula because we've had clearly the best and strongest technology. Our service is world-class and have a long track record of history around superior customer service. And then we've been very strong on the execution front. So that formula has allowed us to be very successful when we're going after the customers that we're interested in going after. So I wouldn't necessarily characterize it as much as an inflection point, but probably just further reinforcement of kind of the success that we've had and the interest that we've had in the customers that we've gone after. I guess I would highlight the quality of the financial institutions that have made these buying decisions is exceptionally high, and probably exceptionally high in a condensed period of time. So when you have a Truist, when you have a TD renewal, when you have a Deutsche Bank decision that we've most recently had, you -- it speaks to the kind of financial institution that we're going after that has the most complex needs, that have the biggest card bases that typically, because of that scale, are winning in the marketplace. And it's exactly the kind of financial institutions that we're wanting to partner with. So as much as the number I would highlight, I think the quality of those decisions is also equally important to us. But we've had a good track record of wins there. So I wouldn't necessarily call this a unique inflection point outside of that.

Vasundhara Govil

analyst
#34

And sort of when do some of these deals sort of going -- start going into the numbers?

Paul Todd

executive
#35

Yes. So we have a full conversion pipeline in 2021. Obviously, our pipeline in 2022, where some more of the newer names kind of begin to come in is also full. So it's -- these decisions when there are new conversions are multiyear in nature. And so usually, it can run anywhere from 18 to probably 24 months from the time you sign a piece of business to the time you actually have them converted and you're seeing revenue. That can move depending on where the client is in that spectrum, but that's roughly the kind of time frames we typically see.

Vasundhara Govil

analyst
#36

Got it. And then you've obviously had a very strong position with traditional financial institutions, but I guess a lot of the growth recently is also happening in the fintech space or you can call it the tech space with neobanks and the gig economy and the card issuance related to that. How are you positioned in that market?

Paul Todd

executive
#37

Yes. So you're right. I mean we are -- traditional client has been the more larger financial institution around the globe. That's continuing to be the largest market that we're interested in going after. But I would say we have with the AWS relationship and the ability of our platform to now go after a smaller customer. And with some of the kind of more flexible technological stack aspects of this relationship is going to allow us to service a different customer base. And so our focus, and it's going to change a little bit with the AWS relationship because we're going to componentize what we sell, but our focus has largely been end-to-end processing. And when you look at scale end-to-end processors, there's really only kind of 2 or 3 that typically can do that in any kind of given marketplace, just because of the scale requirements that our customers have around that. And so that's still the bread and butter of this business. But the flexibility that the AWS relationship gives us will allow us to sell more point solutions, like maybe others are selling down to a smaller neobank or smaller kind of financial institution. And so over the next few years, that will have some more kind of dynamics to it. But today, our target primary market is still that larger end-to-end financial institution.

Vasundhara Govil

analyst
#38

Got it. And I guess then the flip side of that is, what is the risk that some the sort of modern issuing platforms that are using the modern tech stack and are playing in this market start to encroach into your market? As you're coming down to this market, what's the worst that they start coming up and sort of competing with you on the larger issuer side?

Paul Todd

executive
#39

Sure. Yes. So it's a fair question. It's always a risk that a competitor is going to try to kind of go up market or come into a market. I would say that the scale requirements and the demand that bigger financial institution customers have is a pretty high bar. And the cost required to kind of meet those kind of dynamics is one that you've got to have adequate scale to be able to economically service that. I think there's also a track record of service in this area is very important. And so if you're selling a point solution here or there, obviously, there's kind of opportunities both ways, both for somebody to come in but us could go down. But when you're talking about end-to-end processing for the kind of customer base that is clearly our focal point, that bar is pretty high. And certainly, as I said, from a technological standpoint, the capabilities that we're going to have with AWS and the flexibility that we're going to have is going to negate out a lot of the kind of maybe benefits that somebody newer coming in might be able to bring just from a newness of technology standpoint.

Vasundhara Govil

analyst
#40

Got it. That's helpful color. And I guess moving on to the Business and Consumer Solutions segment, that business has obviously been tied by resilience with the pandemic with similar tailwinds. How are you thinking about the long-term growth in that business, particularly, I guess, in light of the increased competition that you probably are seeing from the neobanks?

Paul Todd

executive
#41

Yes. So we've been very pleased, as you said, with the growth that we've had through the pandemic of that business. I would say that the track record of that business to grow it faster than the industry growth rate has been one that has been very impressive for that business. And so we continue to believe that they will be able to execute and grow that business at faster than kind of the market growth rates. I would highlight that since the merger, the ability to kind of move that business outside of the U.S. with our money to pay joint venture, the things we're doing from a cross-sell standpoint from synergies is also additive to what we would have had in that business had we not done the merger. So those are the dynamics at play. It's certainly competitive. It's always been competitive. There's been people that have come in. There's been people that have left. I think the one constant has been, our business has been one that has performed kind of better than the market over a multiyear kind of period with different solutions that have been adapting to the market demands in the business. And so you layer on top that track record with the global infrastructure and the ability to cross-sell, and that's the way we look at that business.

Vasundhara Govil

analyst
#42

And I guess the guide that you've provided us for that business for this year includes the December stimulus, but does it include expectation of another round of stimulus?

Paul Todd

executive
#43

Yes. So as it stands right now, that kind of mid- single-digit revenue does not include additional kind of stimulus on top of that.

Vasundhara Govil

analyst
#44

Understood. So just a couple of more questions I wanted to get to in the last few minutes we have left. So I guess the first one on margins. Obviously, you guys did a pretty good job despite the pandemic margin expansion this past year. And it would seem like there should be a lot of upside from current levels as demand comes back and you would see some really high incremental revenue come back. So maybe just talk to us about the long-term margin outlook and how we should think about the upside versus the investments going into the business.

Paul Todd

executive
#45

Yes. So you're right. We've been very pleased with what we've been able to do on the margin front. Clearly, from just the TSYS merger and the ability to kind of raise the synergy goals and execution there. But then also what we did from a margin standpoint in light of the pandemic and kind of the pivot we did on the expense base. For just this next year, obviously, we talked about that as part of our guide of up to 250 basis points of margin expansion. That -- on the positive side, it has kind of additional synergies. On the headwind side, we are bringing back some of those costs that we took out that were temporal in nature. And so that kind of speaks to the -- this year's margin picture. On a go-forward basis, you're right. As volumes come back, the incremental margin is a tailwind for us. And there's always a blend that -- how much of that drops to the bottom line versus how much we invest back into the business for growth. And I think we've always kind of found that right blend when we're just growing in kind of a non-pandemic kind of recovery point. But I think we've said that we clearly expect margin expansion, call it, roughly 50 basis points maybe annually after we get past this kind of synergy time frame from the TSYS merger and the kind of normal scale benefits in these businesses yield for kind of annual margin expansion year in and year out. And so that's clearly still our target. But you are right that the incremental kind of margins, when they come back, are favorable to the overall picture. And we'll obviously be blending that relative to our overall target, both for the year and kind of how it positions from a longer-term standpoint.

Vasundhara Govil

analyst
#46

Got it. Just in the last minute that we have here, a question on capital allocation. It seems it's been a tough environment to execute on a deal given how crazy fintech valuations have been. What's the appetite to do a deal here? And help us think through what type of assets, what regions are sort of on the top of your wish list. I know we did see sort of the large sort of notes that the debt raise recently, so how realistically could the deal come in 2021?

Paul Todd

executive
#47

Yes. So I mean as it relates to the appetite, we talked for several quarters that we have an appetite to do a deal. We have the strong balance sheet. We have, from a readiness standpoint, management bandwidth standpoint, we're ready. And so -- and we clearly like deploying capital in the form of M&A. We can deliver shareholder value there in a very strong way. So our appetite is strong. I think Jeff commented on our last earnings call around what those areas that we're most interested in. Clearly, software is at the top of that list in our vertical markets business. And -- but we also have interest around the globe when you're able to kind of leverage our merchant and issuing kind of business. And so nothing's kind of changed, both from a readiness standpoint, from an appetite standpoint or from an interest standpoint on which areas that we're looking at from an M&A standpoint. So the environment obviously has some more stability to it now. That's obviously been one thing that has been somewhat of a headwind on getting something done is just adequately kind of assessing the environment and what that looks like in terms of value. But we're clearly positioned to be able to do a deal if it meets all the characteristics that we have for a deal.

Vasundhara Govil

analyst
#48

Great. With that, we're just right out of time. So Paul, thank you very much for joining us and sharing your thoughts. And I hope we can do this in person next year.

Paul Todd

executive
#49

Yes. Well, great. Thanks so much for having me. And likewise, I look forward to when we're able to do this in person again. Take care.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Global Payments Inc. transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Global Payments Inc. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.