GXO Logistics, Inc. (GXO) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 9, 2026

NYSE US Industrials Air Freight and Logistics conference_presentation 35 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Stephanie Benjamin Moore

analyst
#1

All right. Good morning, everybody. Welcome all of you to Jefferies 2026 Industrial Conference. My name is Stephanie Moore, Jefferies Transportation and Logistics analyst. We're very pleased to have the team from GXO today. We have CEO, Patrick Kelleher; and Chief Strategy Officer, Kristine Kubacki. Thank you, guys, for being here.

Patrick Kelleher

executive
#2

Thank you for having us.

Stephanie Benjamin Moore

analyst
#3

Format is just simple fireside chat. I'll kick it off with a bunch of questions, and we can go from there.

Stephanie Benjamin Moore

analyst
#4

Maybe starting with maybe kind of near-term focus just because we did come off of the second quarter results. And I do think -- I certainly have received a lot of questions on just the organic growth performance on the quarter. So on the specifics, 2Q organic growth of 3.4% moderated slightly from the first quarter. We got a lot of questions around that. But I do think on a 2-year stack, it actually accelerated, but there's a lot of nuances there. So maybe just starting with that, can you just talk through maybe some of the nuances 1Q to 2Q, how we should think about the timing of contract start-ups and maybe what drove any kind of deceleration?

Patrick Kelleher

executive
#5

Sure. So I joined GXO 1 year ago. Prior to joining, GXO has been on the decelerating path of organic growth. We were mid-teens organic growth when we spun out of GXO in 2021, forecasting 4% to 5% organic growth this year. a lot of work and effort in the last year to reinvigorate organic growth in the business. I think that evidenced by our Q2 new business signings at $412 million, which I believe is about 35% increase over prior year. I signaled on the call in August that the third quarter would look similar in terms of new contract signings in comparison to last year on a percentage basis. And so we feel good about the trajectory that we're on from an organic growth perspective and reinvigorating that agenda. In Q2, we saw the 3.4% organic growth. It takes about 3 to 6 months to start up a new contract in the contract logistics business. The difference between 3.4% and 4%, which I think everybody was expecting is $17 million. That represents about a 2-week slip in start-up timing. Nothing that high was about, and I was quite frankly surprised how concerned everybody else was. But we reaffirmed we're on path this year for the achievement of our 4% to 5% organic growth guidance, and that still holds. And we will share our organic growth trajectory in our Investor Day, November 16.

Kristine Kubacki

executive
#6

Stephanie, I would just add also is that our incremental revenue for this year at the end of the quarter came up to over $1 billion, and that was a record for us, and it was up about 29% year-on-year. So I think as we look ahead, we already have the visibility secured in that incremental revenue in the second half of this year.

Stephanie Benjamin Moore

analyst
#7

I think that's really helpful. I mean, we get the question quite a bit. It's just is there any change in underlying customer demand, but maybe emphasize what you're seeing there, but also just I think the visibility that you do have that gives you the confidence in the second half outlook.

Patrick Kelleher

executive
#8

Yes. So in terms of customer demand, we talked about this August 5, current customer volumes in the aggregate have been relatively flat, plus minus 1 or 2 -- plus minus 1%. We've seen softer volumes on the e-commerce retail side in Europe and substantially higher volumes on industry verticals of aerospace and defense, technology, industrial and life sciences, those are really netting out to pretty stable volume and revenue for us. You talked about marginal improvement in pricing in terms of year-on-year pricing improvement and the balance of the organic growth is really coming from retention of existing business, not losing business and adding new business in with the new contracts that we're starting.

Stephanie Benjamin Moore

analyst
#9

Maybe just starting on net sales pipeline and a lot of you've put in over the last year. So I think you called out that the sales pipeline is at a record $2.7 billion. What's driving this pipeline growth, just blanket statement there?

Patrick Kelleher

executive
#10

Yes. It is the strategic focus that we put on North America the strategic B2B verticals I've talked about really leaning more into the capabilities competencies that we have in aerospace and defense, life sciences, technology [indiscernible]. That is something I feel like we have not done in the past as GXO, 70% of our business today is consumer retail e-commerce business, 40% of our new business wins so far this year in North America. We're less than 30% of our revenue is in North America. So I think that strategy is coming to life 1% or 2% of our new business wins have been in the B2B verticals. We talked about where we're putting additional emphasis. I shared in the investor call on August that I'm particularly excited about the progress we're making there because we really haven't gotten started yet. [indiscernible] has come on as Chief Commercial Officer in January. We are standing up a digital marketing capability that did not exists in the past, that would be a huge catalyst to be additional pipeline for us. We are adding to our sales teams, particularly on verticals. And most people are just coming in, coming up to speed. So really feel like the teams and our people have done a phenomenal job turning focus to the areas that present the greatest growth opportunity and delivering and converting against that. And we see additional coming with the investments that [indiscernible].

Stephanie Benjamin Moore

analyst
#11

I definitely want to touch on some of those investments in a little bit because I think there's a lot there and a lot of opportunity. But on that $2.7 billion pipeline, can you help us think about how we should think about conversion of that pipeline over the next 12 months?

Patrick Kelleher

executive
#12

Yes. We lagged approximately a 28% conversion rate -- 28-ish percent conversion rate on that pipeline rolling terms about 1.5x a year. So that does not -- the total volume of business we will chase in a year. And I think very exciting ones we signed $412 million of new business in the second quarter. The pipeline at the end of the quarter dropped to $2.3 billion, $2.4 billion, I think, $2.3 billion and spring back to $2.7 billion before the investor call. So there continues to be great marketplace opportunity out there. And it's really about demonstrating a great pipeline to choosing the right opportunities to go after.

Stephanie Benjamin Moore

analyst
#13

And I guess maybe thinking about the building blocks to your organic growth opportunity and to your point, that the 4% to 5% expected for the full year. So you've already -- based on my math, is it locked in? Is it 9% for this year in terms of new wins? So then after that, really you're kind of talking through is the volume, the pricing. Then the other piece is certainly churn or attrition. I think that's been really steady over time. Is there a potential change or over the long term, that churn attrition rate could look different than what it has over the last couple of years.

Patrick Kelleher

executive
#14

Yes. We have an opportunity to improve there. So we're 95% churn rate today. We have an opportunity to be higher there. We have taken a couple of steps towards that. We implemented a customer success model, which is a global account management model at current coming into the organization to netback that is very focused both on customer retention and also growing with our largest customers around the world. So between the 2, we think that's going to be a big mature to organic growth by compressing improving retention even beyond the 95% and driving additional sales.

Stephanie Benjamin Moore

analyst
#15

Maybe getting into some of the actions over the last year. In the second quarter, you did announce what I think was a record deal for the quarter, but it was with a large hyperscaler, which obviously gets us all very excited. And maybe a customer that we didn't historically think would be in the GXO wheelhouse. So first, can you just talk a little bit about what you are doing for that customer -- and then help us understand the life cycle of how data centers or hyperscalers can ultimately be as customers for GXO?

Patrick Kelleher

executive
#16

Sure. We're doing business with multiple hyperscalers across the regions we operate in, so not only in North America but also in Europe. I think everybody is excited about the build-out of data centers, there's lots of activity going on there, we participate from a supply chain perspective and supporting the build out. We have individuals who work in our warehouses who build the racks, who do the wiring who deliver a complete to the data center. It just has to be plugged in by our customers to start working. That is far more efficient than doing that work in the data center. If you've been in a data center, it's quite cream -- it's not easy to work in the data center, you're building [indiscernible] we brought a lot of efficiency to that process. But what I'm even more excited about is we provide all of an and sustainment parts to the data centers. And that is where we see longevity and the solutions that we're providing, we all anticipate that there'll be some sort of peak we might be out in terms of data center build-out. We want to participate there more excited about the services that we're providing around maintenance and sustainment. So server goes down, part goes down, fabrics and so forth. We're providing those parts to the technician for the repair. We're handling the returns of that product coming out, and that has lots of longevity for us.

Stephanie Benjamin Moore

analyst
#17

And then just a follow-up. How does -- how are these contracts may be different or in line with your company average in terms of tenure of the contracts, contract structure, anything there would be helpful.

Patrick Kelleher

executive
#18

Yes. I think they're pretty similar. Those solutions in contrast to some that we implement our lower CapEx solutions. They are in the average contract life that we have right now, which is 5 years. The margins on that is good accretive to our current margins, so that they are great contributors to our growth on...

Stephanie Benjamin Moore

analyst
#19

Touching on maybe some of the commercial success that you've seen thus far and especially calling out those key end verticals. I think there's a lot to unpack there because to your point, you're only 1 year in team is not exactly probably ramping at full capacity either. So -- what's the -- what do you think has driven the initial success in some of these verticals because there's probably a lot of factors at play. I mean, you have Wincanton, which certainly was a bit more industrial-focused or defensive focus. Do you have your own personal background. So maybe if you could bifurcate what's driven the initial success? And then what kind of success should we expect maybe over the next couple of years.

Patrick Kelleher

executive
#20

Sure. I think sort of reflecting on my first year, I've had the question of what did I see at when I arrived -- there's a lot of focus over the last 5 years before I arrived on M&A. I think that M&A has contributed to competencies that we have on the B2B goals, especially. But I don't think the GXO did a good enough job of leveraging those capabilities for organic growth. I think there was a lot of focus on driving synergies out of acquisition and looking for the next acquisition. So when I arrived, around 70 different warehouses, how many countries, 12, 13 countries and the capabilities that I saw, 32 years in the industry were phenomenal. One of our aerospace defense operations in Atlanta, where we support both commercial and defense activity for large airless customer, and it is second to not in terms of our capability. And frankly, I was a little stun that there had been more effort put into growing that. So I think some of the success that we're seeing there is simply coming from focus, getting the message out to key customers around the capabilities that we have there. winning. We have great people operating in these businesses, lots of credibility with customers, so it's getting them in front of customers and winning. We've taken additional steps such as in the U.S., we established Defense Advisory Board. [indiscernible] have a dozen folks who are retired very senior military with supply chain, strong supply chain acumen, helping us formulate the right services and approaching the right people. in the industry to win, and that's been a big catalyst. We formed the [indiscernible] consortium in the U.K., ourselves, [indiscernible] and Accenture pursuing large opportunities with the U.K. government, U.K. military and early days, but we're seeing good pipeline coming from that. So we're bringing in experts and really being open-minded and listening to what customers need, what are the issues in the industry, making sure that we're solving your own problems, and that is the best opportunity to sell new solutions. On the hyperscaler side, we have the opportunity to start very small with one, and we built a phenomenal capability there, and that really has exploded for us with people that we have, the expertise that we have, our ability to move quickly which is absolutely paramount there has made the real difference. And so it really has not been any sort of transformation or reinvention of anything has been about focused on leasing people to focus on organic growth, leveraging the great expertise that we have within the organization and get that we're facing in...

Stephanie Benjamin Moore

analyst
#21

Okay. So one follow-up on this. We've obviously touched a lot about some of these high growth, maybe higher value add verticals and you called out a lot of them, aerospace and defense, being a key one here. But there is still maybe the core e-commerce side of things the core retail consumer. So a 2-part question. What are you seeing from the general overall health of that, I think you called out the e-commerce bucket of your portfolio. And at the same time, does growth in one area maybe come at the expense of the other?

Patrick Kelleher

executive
#22

Yes. I don't think it has to come at the expense of the other. And I also see that when we think about geographies I'll come back to that. We're still seeing the steady growth that we expect from e-commerce and CPG industries. And we expect that to continue. We'll outline that more specifically on November 16 Investor Day. When you think about 40% of our new business this year has been in the B2B verticals, 60% has been in e-commerce and CPG facing businesses. So that business continues to run very healthy. We're seeing larger, more complex projects come on the e-commerce front, a lot more automation robotics and expectation of AI in the operations. And I think that continues to evolve quickly, maybe even more so than on the B2B side. And I think we're really advantaged there with the investments we've made and the expertise that we have in the automation...

Kristine Kubacki

executive
#23

Stephanie, I would just add in the second quarter by just a hair, our second largest win was an e-commerce win in Continental Europe. So into all the things that Patrick has been talking I mean, the complexity with tariffs will trade, that's just lending our solutions to help our customers, and so that's not going away, and that's only increasing.

Stephanie Benjamin Moore

analyst
#24

I think one area that we've talked about for years is the demand for GXO services, you really do come in as kind of an essential partner and it doesn't really matter what the problem is at the time, whether it's tariffs or labor or [indiscernible]. I mean there's always a struggle from a supply chain standpoint. It seems like do you think that the success going forward is just making sure all you can provide is just simply known by customers? Is it as simple as that?

Patrick Kelleher

executive
#25

I think it is. I think our success has to be built on a foundation of excellent service to our customers and their that is where I am most passionate. We want to and strive to continue to be a great place to work. We want to create amazing associate experiences. So it really is a combination of having great people, recruiting, retaining, developing and retiring the very best people in the industry, I always say. And those people providing excellence to customers allows us to grow the core business, and we have the opportunity then to move into different services for customers. So it's not uncommon that we'll start a warehousing operation customer, we'll introduce a packaging operation within the warehouse for that customer doing consumer packaging, creating multipacks and so forth for customers on the B2B side, moving into kidding, subassembly and so forth. Those are [indiscernible] we can grow in. And so for us, we've got the opportunity to increase share of wallet with current customers as well as bring new customers in with these services. But as you said, it is about getting the message out customers understand what it is that we can do for them, the value proposition that we bring, which is a great value proposition as evidenced by the new business that we're signing. I think our digital marketing capabilities that we're standing up, it's going to be a big part that [indiscernible] in a much bigger way than what we do today. So we can expect more pipeline coming from that. And then it is about making sure that we're implementing what we win successfully providing the great service...

Stephanie Benjamin Moore

analyst
#26

Maybe jumping to margin improvement, operating execution, which I think is a whole section of questions that I don't think I would have ever asked the GXO up until you're getting here. So this is, I think, an exciting area that I think investors understand but maybe are looking to see what this could -- the future can hold in this area. So Patrick, when you first joined, I think one of your first initiatives was to transition away from a regional operating model to a more kind of globalized platform. Maybe just talk to us about that process in the last year, and we can start there. And certainly, we have other follow-ups to that. You can start there.

Patrick Kelleher

executive
#27

Yes. When it comes to margin performance, cash flow -- free cash flow conversion, organic growth since I joined especially after my first warehouse visit, I've been very vocal. GXO is underperforming from a margin perspective, particularly when you compare us to our peers. We're a 3.5% of the business, good peers are 6% or better. We -- at the time I joined was at 30% of free cash flow conversion, our best peers in the industry of 50% or better time on organic growth, lagged peers there, we have to be better. I've been very vocal about that internally. I talked about that in my first town hall. That's the one thing I didn't like when I arrived, but I knew what I was stepping into -- and that is an area where we have to be even more and better. So to close the gap on those margins and to be a true market leader, not only from a supply chain execution, but from a financial performance perspective, our approach is multifold. One is, and you referenced, we are a $13 billion organization, which up until a year ago, has been managed in a very regional silo basis. While we've integrated acquisitions, some of those entities managed on their own we are shifting to a One GXO, leveraging the global scale of the business. When I arrived, I used the example, there was no global procurement function. You can imagine after over that a sophisticated procurement person, who could look at the $13 billion enterprise, they would find significant savings opportunities, engaging strategic suppliers on a global basis rather than a regional basis. So that is in motion, leveraging our global scale presents a great opportunity sharing best practice across our 1,200 operations, which we have not done, I think, effectively enough in the past. We have our operational excellence agenda, which is about improving productivity, cost out, sharing value with customers, we're capturing more for ourselves and what we have in the past to improve the margin performance of the contracts that we have with customers that is all about investing in robotics automation labor management systems in order to improve productivity, reduce cost. And then on the other side is making sure that the new business that we're bringing on is accretive to the margins that we deliver today. So pursuable more strategic B2B sectors that are more complex solutions come with higher risk of execution and therefore, are rewarded with higher margins. That is part of the strategy to improve margins, focus on North America, where we have been underweight to our competitors in the growing North America. North America is our smallest region, less than 30% of our revenue. That should not be putting a lot of focus on growing North America was structurally a higher-margin market. And then we look at the TAM that's available to us, we're very small in Asia, less than 1% of our revenue, Thailand, Singapore and Malaysia, executing very well, but there's a huge, huge opportunity for us to grow Asia. We're really going to step into that in earnest in 2027. And Asia is very healthy margin region. And so it's a combination of actions to close the gap on the margin, grow margin performance. We're passionately going on the free cash flow side this year, 30% to 40%, up from less than 30% in the past. And we'll talk about on November 16 about being a better than 50% free cash flow conversion business. That comes not only from working capital, which we have really good opportunities to do, particularly with the global procurement function and also looking more creatively how we are financing and implementing robotics and automation.

Stephanie Benjamin Moore

analyst
#28

I do want to touch on that a little bit. I know you launched the GXO way, which is your kind of standardized productivity if I'm scribing right, the [indiscernible] productivity playbook. Given labor is of your costs. Obviously, we understand the pass-through nature of what that means, but it's still a major -- it's still a pretty large labor-intensive aspect of the business. What site level tools or what productivity initiatives can you deploy specifically on the labor side.

Patrick Kelleher

executive
#29

That is such a great question. And so thematic to what we're doing. As I did the warehouse tours, foundational to a great warehouse execution and in later day times is labor management and labor management systems that support that execution. It is measuring productivity at an individual activity level, coaching performance and removing quiet time in the warehouse where people are standing and may not have work to do because it hasn't around [indiscernible], for example. As I toured, I found 58 different labor management systems at GXO, but I probably only found 60 sites where those had been deployed. So we have a very large initiative to deploy. We're moving to 2 labor management systems for the enterprise as part of One GXO. That way, our leaders have sites can move from site to site. They'll be using largely the same tools. We can implement AI and get scale benefit around improvement in labor management and those systems rather than having to deploy improvement across 58 different systems. And typically, from a labor management system implementation at a site level, we expect a 5% to 15% improvement in productivity. We will share some of that benefit with our customers, some of benefit will accrue to GXO. We'll share more details on the glide path in terms of specific numbers that are driving forward there, but you can imagine with 2/3 of our cost being labor that has to be [indiscernible].

Stephanie Benjamin Moore

analyst
#30

And then maybe just one follow-up, and you certainly touched on the different contracts and especially how that is different even from a geographic standpoint. So as we think about the open book versus closed book mix, how should we expect that to maybe change over time? And then help us think about how you with the focus on margins. But at the same time, return on invested capital is a key aspect as well, too. So how do you manage the mix in contracts?

Patrick Kelleher

executive
#31

Sure. I'm not so caught up in fixed variable versus cost plus. What I am passionate about is to make sure that our cost plus contracts where our customers are reimbursing us for the cost we spend plus the margin include a shared savings component. And that is a very typical in open book contracts. I think that has not been as typical enough as it should have been in the past for GXO, so that is something that we're very focused on. We're happy to be transparent with costs with customers or we happen to be fixed variable providing the customer the certainty in cost, which is the big difference. In both cases, we want to have the mechanism where we're investing in robotics automation, AI and those things that enhance productivity and sharing in the benefit of that investment so that we're getting the right return on capital. And we want to position ourselves in a way, particularly for the cost-plus contracts, where we can be taking those actions and not burdening the customer with a mutual decision that we are going to make investment in the business in automation and robotics, which many times is a constraint, and the industry has been a typical expectation is, if you invest $1 million in the customers' operation we want the customer to guarantee that you get the $1 million back. I know what we can deliver through the robotics and automation solutions that we have. I'd rather go ahead and make the investment. And share in the value that we create for customers, we knew customers because I'm providing a great service at great cost. So we have specific initiatives drive towards that.

Stephanie Benjamin Moore

analyst
#32

Maybe sticking on the topic of automation. I think you've conducted, I think a few does in test with some humanoid?

Patrick Kelleher

executive
#33

45. Soon they're going to be 46 humanoid tests.

Stephanie Benjamin Moore

analyst
#34

What are some of the early learnings here?

Patrick Kelleher

executive
#35

Hand dexterity matters. I think I was quoted recently in an article where I said we don't need Olympic level Humanoids. We all saw the Olympics in China with the humanoids and so forth. We don't need Olympic level of humanoids in the warehouse. We need great hand dexterity. That has been the biggest challenge. And I think the industry has surpassed this year solving that and hand dexterity used to be this now hand dexterity is this. And it's amazing how much more you can do when you can move your fingers like this and just like that. The second piece is the processing speed or the speed of the humanoid and performing [indiscernible] tasks. There's videos on my phone, I'm happy to share with people afterwards. It's painful to watch in humanoid [indiscernible]. Yes. Because it's so slow, it's speeding up. But we've got the -- got to get the productivity of those motions up to what a human can perform it to really get to the ROI that -- on ROI, humanoid industrial, I think right now, it's about $70,000. I think in 2 years, we'll be down sub-$40,000. Operating cost as $15 an hour. I think in 2 years, we'll be down to sub-$10. We don't know the depreciation curve on a humanoid, but maybe if we do 2 years, 3 years, you can figure fully loaded operating cost of $15, $16 an hour, compared to fully loaded an associate is twice that. So there are a lot of tasks in the warehouse environment that we see application for humanoid, which is why we are and have been so aggressive in piloting and working with multiple partners.

Stephanie Benjamin Moore

analyst
#36

Any other areas within the -- because that's all very exciting, but any other areas from an automation standpoint we should think about? Or also GXO IQ, which is an area that I think you've adopted just leveraging AI capabilities, too. So maybe just talk about broad AI, machine learning, other automation and your quest for obviously driving efficiencies and productivity.

Patrick Kelleher

executive
#37

Sure. There's so much innovation going on in the -- just the robotics in automation space, the great work that organizations like AutoStore, Locus and others are doing to advance the technologies there. There is ROI on those technologies today. And innovation continues [indiscernible]. So we continue to fill our innovation funnel with those new technologies, really testing efficacy and looking for opportunities to deploy at scale. We're super excited about XL, which is our middleware solution for the deployment of AI in our operations. We'll have about 60 of our warehouses integrated to GXO IQ this year on a path to get all [indiscernible], integrated over the next couple of years. What that allows us to do is to embed both our proprietary developed AI tools as well as off-the-shelf AI tools in a single system connected to our single data lake, which is very, very important. And for each of our operations to then leverage on a menu basis, the AI tools they want to use for their operations. So that allows us to execute globally and execute at scale globally but customize our solutions locally for the things that individual operations. And so we're very excited as that's rolling out. I think AI going to make a big difference in our business.

Stephanie Benjamin Moore

analyst
#38

All right. Well, last topic, but certainly not the least, there's always a lot of conversation it seems like about Amazon Supply Chain Solutions. Unfortunately, it does seem like whenever they put out any kind of press release, your stock tends to move on the announcement.

Patrick Kelleher

executive
#39

Dramatically. Some how. Yes.

Stephanie Benjamin Moore

analyst
#40

So for those in the room here today, what would be -- I just want to dig in here, but what's your or line of response for, we see this Amazon Supply Chain Solution announcement, revert back to this thought on GXO.

Patrick Kelleher

executive
#41

Amazon is not a competitor to GXO. I a real treat first year as a public company CEO to have the news come out May 4 and the stock dropped 19% on what I label as [ fake ] news, and we have a lot of that these states. But Amazon is very clear in their strategy in terms of how they're going to market. They want to market capacity they have in their warehouses, in their planes and in their trucks, the last mile delivery, to help absorbed fixed costs where I think they've overbuilt in some cases. We don't compete with Amazon on a fulfillment basis. The customer looking for a standardized Amazon solution is not the customer calling us, looking for RDX Direct e-commerce solution for example. So we have never, that I'm aware of, lost a piece of new business to Amazon. We've never lost a piece of the existing business to Amazon. We don't see Amazon as a competitor in our $2.7 billion pipeline. We have a great relationship with Amazon. I think they're a fantastic company. I do think for those of my competitors that compete in the parcel space and last-mile delivery. I think Amazon is a real threat. And I think they will drive price reduction in those particular services. But for us in contract logistics, we are client-aligned solutions. So we develop our solutions that are very specific for what our customers need. And we're not about the standardized solutions. So we simply don't see them swimming in our pool.

Stephanie Benjamin Moore

analyst
#42

And then maybe also if you just want to touch on as being an independent partner well that also can mean in terms of customer meaning you don't also have a potential conflict of interest.

Patrick Kelleher

executive
#43

Sure. I think customers have been even when you look at maybe manufacturers or others who are looking to leverage the Amazon website and their fulfillment capabilities and so forth for the e-commerce offerings. I think there is something to be said for protection of customers' data, which we're very good at. We don't share data across customers. We have no desire to become one of our customers and to compete with them in their own space. And so we provide that independent which and objectivity, which I think is really important, especially when you're providing client aligned solutions. Our client aligned solutions have to be about helping our customers achieve their business objectives, not just shipping a box. So customers have many different business objectives depending on where are in their business cycle. Some of it is achieving the lowest cost. Some of it is achieving the best service. Some of it you have to achieve both when you're shipping life-saving parts, for example, for MRI machines, our solutions client aligned to deliver at the right service at the right cost. And that's why our customers are [indiscernible].

Stephanie Benjamin Moore

analyst
#44

All right. Well, we'll leave it at that. Thank you both for your time.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete GXO Logistics, Inc. transcript — plus 254,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to GXO Logistics, Inc. earnings transcripts and 254,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.