IMAX Corporation (IMAX) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

May 21, 2024

New York Stock Exchange US Communication Services Entertainment conference_presentation 35 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

David Karnovsky

analyst
#1

All right, let's get started. My name is David Karnovsky. I cover media, entertainment and advertising at JPMorgan. Happy to have, at least with me the first time at the conference, Natasha Fernandes, Chief Financial Officer at IMAX. Thanks for being here.

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#2

Thanks for having me, David.

David Karnovsky

analyst
#3

Let's start a big picture question on how you think IMAX's position in the exhibition industry has shifted post-pandemic, and why should that be meaningful to investors?

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#4

IMAX has strengthened its position post-pandemic. We have several tailwinds to IMAX. And people when they go to the movies, they want to see blockbusters and they want a premium experience. We've also shifted our position in the industry with filmmakers and studios. We're now at the forefront of conversations first with even filmmakers and then coming alongside with studios to make sure the IMAX of it all is very present, and you'll see it in even articles and things that come out when they talk about movie releases, and it specifically calls out and it has an IMAX release. That's not something you would have seen a few years ago. And you see this back in our results. We're already back to 2019 box office, capitalizing on IMAX demand by growing our global network, opening that content aperture and having other types of experiences and events happening in our locations. And then if you think about why is it meaningful to investors, well, it's all coming down to how are we growing our bottom line, right? And it's growing through the consumer shift in demand and behavior, growing our market share. Globally, our market share -- we've had our best ever domestic market share in Q1 of almost 6%, which then, in turn, turns into obviously financial results. But then also just even our placement of being able to be at the forefront of conversations.

David Karnovsky

analyst
#5

Maybe I'll ask one on the slate. Outside of the typical August slowdown, you have a pretty consistent, I would say, nicely diverse slate content coming, notably better before than last year. What are you most looking forward to that could surprise the upside in terms of IMAX performance?

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#6

The remaining 2024 slate has really good potential. If you sat and you lined up '23 versus '24, '24 slate looks really good. And it's a perfect fit for IMAX. Our Furiosa is actually coming up really quickly this weekend, and the pre-sales are really strong. It's actually stronger than Godzilla Kong and Planet of the Apes with respect to pre-sales. So that's doing really well right now. Q3 has Deadpool, which could be really huge. It's between that and Despicable Me are named as the top performers of the year right now, right? And then that leads us towards thinking Q3 will be a really strong quarter. And then you look at Q4, and it has Joker. And truthfully, everyone at IMAX, including Rich, is very excited about this title. I mean, I think we'll index high. It's a film for IMAX title. It's got film prints and it's going to go out to some film locations very similar to the way Dune was. So it's going to have the whole IMAX of it all in that as well. And then if you look at some other titles, there are some good potentials in Q4 with Wicked. So there's this amazing world building happening there, and Universal is already out behind it, putting marketing materials out there. Gladiator II with some epic battle scenes, and it's been a long time since the first Gladiator. Mufasa, which is a perfect holiday title, and then we also have Venom 3, a film for IMAX title. So everybody who wants their superhero fix, and we'll get in there a little bit too.

David Karnovsky

analyst
#7

I can't believe you left out Beetlejuice Beetlejuice.

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#8

Beetlejuice Beetlejuice, yes, is coming as well. I remember that from my days as well. That will be interesting to see.

David Karnovsky

analyst
#9

All right. In the past, when I discussed slate with Rich, I always start with that Hollywood first question, but we do have to cover local more in depth now. So for investors less familiar with theatrical abroad, what's important to know about mix of Hollywood versus local? And what role are you playing there?

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#10

What's great is, over the last few years, we've actually seen a shift in our box office dynamic. So we've had about 20% of our box office coming from local language between last year and then even in Q1. And as you -- as we look forward, you look at what that opportunity is. And so we actually -- everybody was closed, right? So we had the time during the pandemic to hone in on local language and what wasn't working versus what could work. And we developed a new DMR in the cloud process, we built out our studios' relationships, our local language studio relationships and created some slate deals with them as well. And that's what's actually created the opportunity for us is we got some time to hone in on building out those relationships with local studios and really pushing that forward. And anime is a great example. It's like increasing consumer demand. It's a great local-to-global strategy. So how we take Hollywood, and we push it global. Well, now you're taking those local languages and you're pushing those global and you're bringing them back to North America, and so lots of opportunity there. What's great is it follows the same economics as our Hollywood deals as well. So you're still getting the same good take as we do in Hollywood titles. And it gives us other content. So you're not so reliant on Hollywood content. You're getting an opportunity for all of this other content. And in some regions, like in other world, in rest of world countries like China or France and Japan, local language is more popular than Hollywood is.

David Karnovsky

analyst
#11

2025 slate looks really strong. Marvel, DC, Avatar and F1 movie that looks like it was kind of made for premium. There's 10 films on there right now shot with IMAX cameras. What's driving that uptick in camera usage. How is that different or -- sorry, how is the indexing different? And that applies -- you also mentioned [ Prince ] before. Maybe how widely can that be used? I know that's a little bit more limited.

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#12

Actually, we -- Rich was at [ Cannes ] last week, and so we actually held a press conference there with over like almost 10 firms, and they -- we unveiled -- it was 14 films filmed for IMAX for next year. So it's actually increased since we last talked. So I think it's more than double any previous year, which we're excited about. But I think it's just a win-win all around. We're creating this IMAX films, creating this more immersive sort of experience for consumers, it's resulting in higher demand and better indexing. We have the ability with print. So you think about Dune 2 and even Joker. It's filmed completely on digital cameras, but we've then converted it to prints, and we're doing a limited release amongst like 10 to 15 film locations, and it's creating that halo effect for us of wanting to experience it in IMAX and doing almost appointment booking, right, appointment viewing. And so that's what's been really helpful towards that whole piece too. And demand and use for the IMAX camera has taken off. We've had so many people coming to us with the IMAX camera. So actually at Cannes, we actually talked about the film camera and that we had 4 in production, and we're starting to build out what could the next generation of film cameras look like, and we're working directly with filmmakers on those. So I think there's lots of opportunity there, too, to make sure we build the right one for filmmakers that they want to use.

David Karnovsky

analyst
#13

Got it. Outside of the cameras, what other tools do you or your exhibitor partners have to drive higher indexing on IMAX?

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#14

The cameras, the remastering, so our technology that's in the remastering process with respect to creating the quality and the image and the sound [ vitality ], creating the most experience, like immersive theater experience. So sitting back and actually sitting in one of those bigger theaters and getting the sound, the screen, the quality, all happening because we have that 24X7 maintenance happening. And then, of course, the bespoke marketing like you would have seen -- we would have seen in The Planet of the Apes how IMAX was all over that marketing. And then Furiosa well, just experience it in IMAX. So you're no longer seeing like a list of 20 names across a poster. You're seeing IMAX and maybe one other. But in some cases, you're just seeing IMAX. And working with studios and filmmakers to understand, to market it specifically for IMAX and have our name built into that marketing.

David Karnovsky

analyst
#15

Got it. I wanted to follow on one stat I think you gave this either at a conference or on earnings, but it surprised me was that you're indexing on Dune grew in week 2 and then again in week 3. And I don't understand it because I thought, okay, it should have been the opposite, right? All the fan boys come out in week 1, they want the IMAX format, and the more casual audience that get in the way. What's going on there?

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#16

That's like the best phenomena ever. It just keeps growing week after week after week. But I think that's exactly back to the appointment viewing. That's what happened. You couldn't get booking -- you couldn't get a seat on weekend 1, so you waited and you booked week 2 or week 3, and I think it's clearly apparent between both Dune and Oppenheimer that the film for IMAX titles really do well with that. And people have the patience to wait now. The one thing about what's happening now is you're not worried about an Easter Egg getting out, right? So some of these titles like Oppenheimer and Dune, you're going for the drama and the effect of it all. So you just want to experience it and you're willing to wait for that best experience.

David Karnovsky

analyst
#17

Got it. Okay. You've stated I think previously your screens are kind of basically booked from like May to September of next year. I'm curious. When we look at this slate generally, we've always been surprised studios don't take advantage of slower periods. If you look at this year, it seems like the first 1/3 of the year had a little bit more room. Do you see room for the kind of slate to extend in the quieter periods? Can you play a role there to facilitate that?

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#18

I think there's a complete opportunity. Just because something has been labeled a blockbuster period before it doesn't mean it's always a blockbuster period going forward. I mean you look at March. Dune released March 1. It's not typically a blockbuster period. I think there's an opportunity if you put a really good quality piece of content out there that we could definitely create an IMAX halo effect around it and make it perform well. And I think we need to start thinking through that there's 52 weeks in a year, and every week is a week where people would go to the movies. There's nothing stopping you from going to the movies in January versus in June, right? So I think there's good quality that you can definitely do that. And then just think about it, we also have that opportunity with the experiential content and the alternative content. So pushing that forward in those periods, we did [ Clean Rock ] in January, right, a weekend in January and made $5 million on that weekend. I think that's where you get the opportunities to then fill in the slots that Hollywood is not taking and push some more box office through the IMAX network.

David Karnovsky

analyst
#19

And I was thinking if the studios aren't allowed to talk to themselves, right, you can say --

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#20

They're allowed to talk to us.

David Karnovsky

analyst
#21

Someone's going to take this mid-January. Maybe get the Super Bowl sold without that long shot. Okay. So as IMAX's position with studios has become more important, what are some positive implications that come with that? So for instance, one of the more interesting comments I thought on a prior call was when Rich indicated that there have been some increased flexibility from your partners, studio partners, I would say, to book alternative content during the week. So maybe that's one thing you can talk about. But how this could benefit you?

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#22

Yes, I think it's a give-and-take. When there's more competition for the windows, then there's -- and they'll ask for greater IMAX alignment and at times flexibility. But I think we view -- we're very smart on the way we view our relationships and we view our relationship with studios as partners. So we work together on that. And you mentioned having conversations. We're always in conversations with the studios as to timing and what could happen. I mean when you think about A24, we actually started a slate deal with A24 for an iconic film series. So they're just bringing back iconic films from their library. I think this week, there's Uncut Gems. It's what's getting released this week, and we've already done 2 others. But it's great because it's creating like this additional piece of content that people get an opportunity to see and it's enabling us to create higher utilization in the IMAX locations. And then internationally, there's always been more flexibility because we don't necessarily lock in the international releases, right? And so you have the opportunity to program what fits local tastes better. And so I think that all works nicely together to create that higher utilization for us.

David Karnovsky

analyst
#23

Got it. How about the take rate, right? Your take rate from studio is fairly consistent. Sometimes there's been a bump in specific periods. I think that's associated with certain films. Any opportunity to kind of increase that over time? Or is that not really the driver?

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#24

I wish.

David Karnovsky

analyst
#25

They're becoming more important, right, in IMAX releases.

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#26

Yes. And we are. And I think that's where -- the fact that we get 12.5% and it's been steady, it's been consistent over decades, I think that's a pure sign of exactly what -- of how valued we are the fact that has not changed. But where the opportunity lies is the conversations that we're having around other deliverables like marketing, versioning, early release dates, earlier releases than for an IMAX location versus others, doing Q&As with directors and filmmakers. So I think that there's other ways of grabbing opportunities aside from the straight take rate off the top. But I think that's where you get the opportunities from them.

David Karnovsky

analyst
#27

You mentioned before utilization, the partnership with A24 to bring in more content during the week. I guess that leads into a conversation around alternative content. Part of that, I think is you brought some older content back, right? Queen Rock, and that was successful for you. The indexing was good. Sorry, the margins were good. With regards to older content, like what's the wider opportunity here, right? If DMR costs are coming out down, can you like rescreen older films, things that should have been on IMAX 40 years ago, but tech wasn't there yet?

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#28

I hope you went to see Jaws and ET because we did bring them back last year after 40 years. So there's definitely opportunity. I think what was great out there, what could we bring back, could you bring back if you're doing -- I don't -- it's not what happening, but if you did Gladiator and you brought back the first one and you want to do the second one or if there's other titles that you want to see first in a series and then see the next installment, I think there's lots of opportunities there. I mean concert series, definitely, there's an opportunity. You look at Queen Rock, we did -- before that, we did the Beatles. We did a small event with Andre 3000. We're doing Beach Boys next week, a documentary with Beach Boys. So lots of opportunities with respect to concert films. And there's a whole library out there of concert films that have existed for decades. So sifting through them and seeing what will work, what could be DMR and make it into a really good high-res and quality fidelity for us, I think that would be a great alternative to push through.

David Karnovsky

analyst
#29

And you have to do an event around it too, put the band back together.

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#30

Exactly. I mean we did that with Talking Heads, Stop Making Sense toward last September, and I was there. And that entire cinema in Toronto was like everybody was standing and dancing and it was all -- what I found interesting is it was all different generations. It's not like just the generation from 4 years ago. It's a generation now, too. So I think there's lots of opportunity.

David Karnovsky

analyst
#31

Maybe just moving forward to your theater relationship. So at earnings, you disclosed 17 signings year-to-date. That pace was off a little bit from the same time last year, though Rich kind of talked about activity remaining high, more announcements to come. I think more announcements have come. Any update to provide here? And have you observed any momentum shift in terms of interest from the exhibition community?

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#32

Yes. Our sales pipeline is stronger than ever that I can recall, and I've been here 17 years. I mean the pace is picking up. In Con, there was a lot of momentum behind those conversations. Our Head of Sales attended it with Rich as well, and they had lots of conversations with exhibitors, not only in Europe but exhibitors who were from different countries that were there, including from China. And so I think that there are opportunities. Since earnings, we've done a 10-system deal with SM Cinema in the Philippines, and we've done another 3-system deal with Megarama in France. And then in 2023 on the back of Avatar success, I mean, we signed almost 130 systems, right, which was almost 3x the year before. So I think there's lots of opportunity. And you think about even in the States. We just signed a deal with EVO last year for 8 systems. So even regions that you think may be fully populated, then there's still opportunities with respect to what could an experience look like for IMAX in those regions. And EVO's great because it's that experiential environment where it's a complex that has like restaurants and other activities and then a few cinemas. It's not like a 20-plex, right?

David Karnovsky

analyst
#33

Yes. And just remind, I mean, for the audience like the process of going from signings in the backlog to build. Sometimes you're signing and building immediately, sometimes it's extended. What are the factors that kind of drive that?

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#34

So it depends on -- we could do sign and install, meaning you sign it this year and you install at some point this year, and that's because the complex already exists. And so really it will only take us a few weeks to go in and pull out whatever technology is in that box and put an IMAX system in. But the other opportunity is if it's a new build, if it's a new build, it could take somewhere between 1 to 3 years depending on the construction timing of the exhibitor and their plans. What's great about our backlog, if you even looked over the past 5 years, it's remained steady. Like we're at about 450 systems in backlog, of which almost 400 are new for new footprint, and we've been growing our footprint about 5% a year. And I think as you look at that, we continue to install. We guided this year 120 systems to 150 for installations. And as you install that, you're then replenishing it with these signings. And so lots of opportunities with respect to not only signing installs, but then also creating a flow of future installations to solidify that continuous growth every year.

David Karnovsky

analyst
#35

And on the 120 to 150, the mix was pretty similar to last year in terms of JVs versus reasonable term and sales-type leases and upgrades and non-upgrade. Any reason to think that mix would change over time or should we expect that to be relatively steady? How should we think about that?

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#36

It's been pretty steady overall. And I mean, even the backlog, it's pretty evenly mixed right now. But I think there's an opportunity to do, whether it be JVs in countries where there's high per screen averages, I think that's an opportunity for us. We have a really healthy balance sheet. So if I was thinking about capital allocation, I think there's an opportunity where we put up the capital and do that model so that we can get the return through the JV rent, like the film rental returns. But the other thing we've been moving towards are hybrids. So sort of that mix between a sale and a full lease where like all the cost of a system is covered, but then you get a higher percentage rent, which as you look out to years of 2025, '26, even with the film slate coming in '26 as well, if you have higher box office periods, then you'd rather have a network that you're getting to have film rentals on because that's when you start to get all that incrementality in the model.

David Karnovsky

analyst
#37

Right. So the balance sheet becomes a strategic asset for the future.

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#38

Oh, yes. And we have a great balance sheet to do that.

David Karnovsky

analyst
#39

Right. I think you've estimated a global penetration at a little under 50%. That breaks down to 55% in the U.S. and China, approximately 35% for rest of world. Where are you most focused in terms of filling out the opportunity right now?

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#40

We only, as you said, 35% penetrated, which gives us a lot of opportunity in the rest of the world market. We have a huge opportunity with respect to growing market share. If you looked at the market share for rest of world, we're at only half of where we are domestically. So even taking that up one point would make a significant difference for us. And I think we -- if you think about even domestic, 20% of our signings were in domestic in '23 and even 20% was in China. So I think there's still growth in even the other areas, too. But if I was thinking about where we could really expand out significantly and make an impact right now would be Japan. We only have about 55, 56 there currently, and there's opportunity for 100-plus over there. And they have a really high per screen average. It's approaching $2 million, and that's because of the local language content play as well as Hollywood. Australia only has 2 in that entire country, which we know has zoned for 40. India, there's only 40. And if you think about the opportunity in India with respect to Bollywood content and all the other dialects that they have now, too, I mean there's lots of growth that we could have there. I think we've zoned it for 150. Germany, France, the Middle East, all areas that we're focused on right now.

David Karnovsky

analyst
#41

And so for some of these markets with low penetration, what becomes the thing that gets ball rolling ultimately? Is it the theater owners and they're kind of looking at this and saying, how do I generate traction? And then places like Australia, right, that's a big opportunity? Do you have an established brands in some of those markets?

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#42

We have -- our brand is growing in some markets, but we do have an established brand in some of them like Japan, for instance. What's been interesting is as you start to have the conversations and the exhibitors think, okay, those zones have been there, I have time, I don't really need to react, well, then all of a sudden we sign a deal with someone. So in France, we did that last year. We signed a deal with someone and suddenly, it's like this supply/demand, right? And you create the competitive forces that help you have those conversations sooner because what they were waiting on before they no longer can wait because if the zone goes away, we're not willing to -- there's no zone left. So they have to really come to the forefront and the table quicker now.

David Karnovsky

analyst
#43

How about domestically? You could argue IMAX maybe faces some competition from exhibitor-owned formats or exhibitor-owned PLF formats, as you look to open zones in the U.S., I think there's around 250, do you have to get additional buy-in from circuits that haven't engaged with you as much? What can you do there?

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#44

So I don't think exhibitors are PLFs or anything like IMAX for sure.

David Karnovsky

analyst
#45

I know I teed you up for that. I tried to --

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#46

Okay. They perform well, but they are definitely no IMAX. And so I think if anybody doubted whether IMAX was a PLF, I think Dune 2 clearly showed it like 1 in every 5 tickets across the world sold in IMAX, like that is unbelievable when you think about the fact that we're on less than 1% of the screens. And so I think we have tremendous opportunity still to grow domestically with both existing and new partners. And so I think we have quite a few domestic partners that still have even runway. We have them in our backlog, we have more deals that are pushing out now. And then I mentioned EVO a little earlier. We signed with new partners like EVO. But with the successes of Oppenheimer in June, I think it's just clearly evident that without having IMAX, you won't perform as well. Like you have an opportunity to expand your box office by having an IMAX location. And it's clear. It's in the numbers, it's like clearly shown, and you can see it. Anybody who had an IMAX location for Dune, for Oppenheimer, probably for Deadpool and Joker, like particularly the film, the ones that get filmed for IMAX, that's where you get the big opportunity. And I think the halo effect onto those complexes is evident too.

David Karnovsky

analyst
#47

Got it. I want to circle back to just the China, I was going to ask on box, but I also just want to ask on installs, right? I mean previously, going back years ago, that was a real big focus on the install side, still a substantial amount of installs there. Maybe just refresh us on kind of where the footprint is being out, what the opportunity is in that market.

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#48

I think we did a really good job a few years ago when we did the IPO, taking that capital and really pushing out and creating growth in China. And so we have over 700 locations there with an opportunity to double that. I mean, really, it comes down to strategically stepping back and saying how much do we want to continue to grow in China and use our capital there or how much should you want to go to the rest of world regions where the per screen averages are higher. So not that you would not grow in China, but would you grow at the same rate? Or would you use your capital somewhere else? And I think that's where an opportunity lies. Because as we look at China, we have a really strong presence in China. Our brand is well established. We performed really well on local languages, and on Hollywood -- I mean, Planet of the Apes, we've been doing almost 15% of index. Yes. And so if you think about what's our opportunity over there, I think our opportunity over there is to really focus on utilization and increasing that as opposed to creating a lot more new locations. Now of course, we're going to still expand in China. We have a great agreed with commitments, and we're going to continue -- we just signed a new deal with Hengdian in Q4 for another 20 system deal, I believe. And so if we -- we're still expanding, but will we expand at that same rate that we did back in 2015, 2016? Probably not because I think you should look at capital allocation, you'd want to use it in other regions now too.

David Karnovsky

analyst
#49

On the box office there, I think that was your softest region box office wise growth and absolute in Q1. There is some noise there, right, difficult Avatar comps, there were some local comps. But can you talk a little bit about what you're observing in that market in terms of moviegoing index? And you just talked about Planet of the Apes, [ 15% ] that's been kind of generally. Any other incremental color would be great.

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#50

Yes, I think Q1 was not as strong versus the other regions due to the Chinese New Year. There wasn't no large blockbuster. It was mostly dramas. And then the Hollywood content hasn't been performing as well over there right now. But I think there's been steady improvement. I think that there's an opportunity for us to expand the way our brand is even looked at over there. So not simply large blockbusters, but like how we did Oppenheimer here last year, a drama-based film or scientific film. Like we could do other genres. And I think that's getting our brand in China associated with the local language dramas is really going to help us as we move forward over there. I think that's a really good opportunity. Plus alternative content. We actually announced a deal with NBA China last night through IMAX China where we're going to do the NBA finals. And so we're trying that out on a test number of screens in Hong Kong and Taiwan. And then if that works, hopefully, there's an opportunity to expand that through Mainland China if it those through the censorship pieces than it needs to. But I think could alternative content like how we're doing here in the States with concerts or we did the Sugar release, so are there opportunities over there with local artists in China to create other types of content that will bring in consumers to the theaters as well.

David Karnovsky

analyst
#51

Right. There's a lot more flex to do that type of content.

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#52

If it's local artists, there will be. So the only...

David Karnovsky

analyst
#53

But that's probably also where the opportunity is, right? You're not going to bring, I guess, any '24...

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#54

They don't have Beach Boys over there, right?

David Karnovsky

analyst
#55

Or Beach Boys. Sorry. That was a better example. Okay. I want to just shift to margins. So IMAX is guiding to a target of 40% in 2025, roughly 40%, relative to high 30s in 2024. What are the key factors to think about when we look at your long-term trajectory? Is it all kind of operating leverage off a higher box? Are there other kind of factors in your control that you're focused on?

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#56

There's significant amount of operating leverage that we have in our margins, especially from, as you said, from the higher box office as we expand that box office. But expanding that box office comes from also expanding our network. So as we expand our network, it expands our box office and as well as we have the whole film for IMAX of it all, which in '25 is going to be very evident with the 14-plus titles. Then all of that comes through the bottom line. And if you look at Q3 last year, it was our best Q3 ever, and we had EBITDA margin of 49%. So you start looking at what's that opportunity. And then the other part of that is, I expect steady improvements in our margins overall as we look at continuing to look at our costs and how can we create economies of scale in certain areas and then also the streaming consumer business. And so while it's still small right now, it has very high margins to it. And so as you grow that out, that will make a difference as well.

David Karnovsky

analyst
#57

I'll come back to some more in a second, but maybe one more on CFO type question. Working capital has been a little bit of a drag in the post-COVID period, pre-pandemic. It was kind of more flattish if you looked at it on a multiyear basis. Can you talk to the dynamic here? Would you expect this to reverse, move back to neutral over time?

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#58

I do expect it to reverse and become a contributor actually. I think that there's just a dynamic we are experiencing right now. You looked at Q4 and the weaker slate that happened in Q4. It's just a timing thing with respect to when do you receive in your cash and your working capital all flows through. And so I think we need to remember that the exhibitors went through a very long period of COVID and trying to recover and now everybody's return to health. And so you'll start to see all of that free cash flow kind of come through the model. And if you looked historically, the free cash flow conversion was higher, much higher. And so I see that opportunity coming forward. And then as a management team as well, we're actually focused on free cash flow now. It's one of our metrics that we're being held accountable to. So I think that helps us as well as we look towards improving that metric.

David Karnovsky

analyst
#59

Got it. Very helpful color. About 4 minutes left. Anyone in the room want to ask one? Right here.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#60

So when you're doing the JVs, how do you evaluate them, for example, [indiscernible] rates or how do you deploy your capital in there versus it looks like the last 5 years, you closed out quite a bit of your stock and buybacks, but then again, 2013 to 2020, you also closed a bunch of buybacks. So how do you figure out how to allocate that capital? And how do you know that you should build, put capital to work in India or China or somewhere else?

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#61

Yes. So we actually have a committed backlog where we schedule out what our installations are going to be. And so we know what we're committed to with the exhibitor partners with respect to number of JVs or not. And then also as we as we look at just the sign and installs as well, there's that opportunity, too. So we allocate out a certain amount of capital for JVs and system expansion. System expansion is long-term growth for us, right, especially in years that are like -- that are coming up for '25 and '26 when the higher box office levels are expected to be evident. But then as you sit on some other cash or excess cash or even drawing into the revolver, which we've done this past quarter to do buybacks, we really think it's important to support our stock price if we feel like there's an opportunity. We've done almost over $100 million in the past few years actually. We did $80 million in the year before that. And I think we bought almost 19% of our shares outstanding back, and it's been a good use of our capital. I mean, you kind of have these streams. You have investment in JVs, we have buybacks and then you have M&A activity. And so we did SSIMWAVE a couple of years ago. We're not a very frequent M&A firm. But if we do, it would be an impactful one that we would look at, but not very large. So I think we have an opportunity with respect to buybacks to continue. We feel like it's a good use of our cash to buy back our own stock. It's a good investment for sure.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#62

Was that an exceptional use of cash?

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#63

So we don't guide to how much we're going to buy back generally. I think we've just been doing that on an ad-hoc basis. We have a pretty active management team that's involved in that process, including Rich, our CEO and myself. And so, we're always looking at what the prices are and what's our opportunities. And then it's just an evaluation between how much debt, what's the rates, what's the buyback tax, all of those components that you contemplate in making that investment.

David Karnovsky

analyst
#64

Okay. Unfair to do this in 2 minutes, but SSIMWAVE, you talked about it on your margin business. What's the opportunity for in-home? And what are some emerging use cases you're excited about?

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#65

We're still very excited about SSIMWAVE. We actually have rebranded the whole thing. We -- it's now called streaming consumer tech, so it includes SSIMWAVE plus IMAX Enhanced. It's in our other sort of segment in our financials right now. But as we look at 2023 was our foundation year of building it out, bringing on a new sales team, actually doing some R&D and creating a better product that's more plug and play. When we bought the company, the product that we bought and actually -- in order to sell it, you would have to take down the tech stack at another company and put it in. So this now, the R&D that we did, we now -- it's now more plug-and-play and sit on top. And the great thing about that is for streaming companies, we've done studies and it can save them 20% plus of streaming costs just from bandwidth savings and transmission costs. And you think about an opportunity for companies to save money where they've been losing money, this is it, right? And so what -- I see that being a huge contributor towards the future and an opportunity for us. It's just getting sort of those legs in place. We are actually at NAB in April, and we had over 200 meetings. We did a panel with Disney+, I think. And that went really well. They're using our Stream Smart product. So I think as we work on building out our future with that, I'm excited about it. It's a new TAM for us, for sure, too, which is great.

David Karnovsky

analyst
#66

Always good to hear. All right. Thank you, Natasha.

Natasha Fernandes

executive
#67

Thanks for having me, David.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete IMAX Corporation transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to IMAX Corporation earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.