Insignia Financial Ltd. (IFL) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

November 30, 2020

Australian Securities Exchange AU Financials Capital Markets investor_day 206 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Renato Mota

executive
#1

[Audio Gap] to come. For IOOF today, it's a fantastic opportunity for us to share some of our strategic pillars with you, our shareholders or our analyst community, so I'm very keen to do a bit of a deep dive into our 3 key priorities and key strategic initiatives. But before doing so, I did want to spend a couple of moments just setting the macro landscape. And really, that macro landscape starts with some principles that have been a feature of IOOF's narrative over the past few years. And that is that we see tremendous opportunities in an advice-led organization and an advice-led wealth management organization to capitalize on the changing world around us. And that's a world that we're seeing increase the capital wealth. We're seeing an aging population with increasing complexity of needs, and that's certainly not going away anytime soon. And at the same time, and certainly, as I've discussed in the context of the MLC transaction, we are seeing structural industry disruption, we think, which provides a tremendous opportunity for IOOF. Within that context, certainly over the past 18 to 24 months, you've heard me describe the strategic journey for IOOF across 3 key sectors, being initially to stabilize the business, and that's certainly been a key focus and priority over the preceding 18 to 24 months. Following that, we always saw a transformation phase, which is very much the phase we find ourselves in now. And executing the transformation phase efficiently and effectively will lead us to the prosperity phase. I think I want to spend a couple of moments just reflecting on what we have achieved during the stabilization phase, really since the end of 2018. So that's nearly coming up to 2 years now. We had a very deliberate focus on resetting our culture and building a purpose-led culture. And I think that served us very well during the early part of this year and certainly during COVID and continues to serve us well. We have put an tremendous amount of effort into our governance uplift capabilities across the business broadly, but also, specifically, in the Advice segment, and generally taking a really rigorous view of the kinds of capabilities and the quality of our capabilities as a business as we look to enter into what is a very deliberate growth phase for the business. In our minds, really, the 30 June of this year was really sort of the end of the transformation, when we really tipped into the end of the stabilization phase, I should say, and we really tipped into the transformation phase. And probably the key message to note here in transformation, even prior to having completed the P&I transaction prior to having announced MLC, those 3 pillars of transformation being Advice 2.0 and Evolve 21 and integration were key pillars of our business. And certainly, that was with one mind to the P&I -- completing the P&I acquisition, which we completed earlier this year, in February of this year. And the MLC transaction really gives us an opportunity to capitalize and further leverage those strategic pillars, particularly Advice 2.0 and Evolve 21, which you'll hear more about today. The reason those pillars and that strategy is very important has to be seen through the context of our industry and our communities that we serve, particularly from a client lens. And I emphasize the client lens because it's important to recognize that as an industry, as a wealth management industry, we serve and we're beneficiaries of a client journey that begins in the late teens to early 20s when people are entering the workforce. Their lives go through dramatic change over the following 30 to 40 to 50 years and see as there have been quite discrete phases of life. And as an industry, our role is to support those phases, help improve decision-making and obviously, help improve the probabilities of people leading the lives they want to live. I think it also needs to be recognized that as an industry, we're focused on the last third or maybe the last half of that journey traditionally in what I would call our traditional Advice segment. And certainly, IOOF has a leading position in this segment, be it through Shadforth, the high net worth segment, Bridges in the mass market, or our self-licensed -- sorry, self-employed businesses throughout the middle there. And you'll hear more from Darren today around how we're looking to transform that traditional Advice segment. And that really provides a very key pillar in our continued evolution of the relevance of advice to all Australians. And there continues to be significant opportunity to make advice more accessible to more people and particularly to that cohort on the left-hand side of the chart that you see there, which is those that have probably been excluded from advice traditionally. But with the evolution of technology and the scalability of insights and customization, we think there's a tremendous opportunity to continue to increase our relevance in that segment. And certainly, with the MLC transaction, IOOF will have a captive audience or an opportunity of about 1 million unadvised clients throughout our business. So there continues to be a tremendous opportunity to build a business and build relevance in a broader community. And one of the reasons we are committed and remain passionate about the role of advice has been reinforced in some research we've undertaken recently, which was completed in the last month or so, which was across approximately 13,000 both advised and unadvised clients, but really did reinforce the value of advice. Now the findings of this research has been consistent with previous research that we ourselves have done or others have done, but fundamentally reinforced the tremendous value that exists in advice and the tremendous value that as a business we can build by making advice more accessible to more people. If we focus on the left-hand side there, you will see some key statistics on, just to call out a couple. 95% of people in an advice relationship agree that receiving advice has given them greater peace of mind financially. So this is more than just having more in your bank balance. This is actually about having a greater peace of mind and being more in control of your own life. 73% say they saved more money as a result of receiving advice. So again, this is about changing behaviors. This is about changing people's behaviors through their life. And I think particularly important and topical over the past year or so has been that 94% have an understanding of the annual fees they pay for advice based on several advice documents they received. There's real clarity of what people will pay and what they receive in return. The right-hand side, I think, is really the key message to take away from this slide, which is what we call the advice dividend. So this is benchmarking those clients that receive advice against the control group of clients that do not receive advice. And I think what you can see there, in every instance, irrespective of whether it's under 50 years of age, over 50, mass market or affluent, in every circumstance, there is an advice dividend, i.e., the people who are in receipt of advice and are beneficiaries of advice have a higher well-being across a number of different metrics as a result of that advice. So we can -- we know empirically that there is value associated with advice and the value exceeds what people pay for it. And I think through increasing the reach of advice, reducing the cost of delivering that advice and making it more accessible, I think IOOF is at the forefront of actually creating value, not only for the community, but also for the owners of IOOF through an advice-led strategy. So just to really introduce the sessions that we'll follow today. You'll start by hearing from Darren Whereat, our Chief Advice Officer, this morning around how are we going to make advice more accessible and more cost-effective to deliver. That's then followed by a session on Evolve 21, which is about reinforcing our position and our transformation of building a leading proprietary platform, one platform across all client cohorts, which we believe is a unique proposition in this market, that really looks to differentiate on service excellence. And we'll wrap up today with a presentation from -- led by Chris Weldon, our Chief Transformation Officer, around how the P&I and MLC integrations will transform the growth potential for IOOF, looking to differentiate by having the lowest cost to serve in our business, and we think that is a key driver of value for the business longer-term, as well as developing trust through outcomes and service excellence. So it's about building a reputation, continuing to build a reputation and being at the forefront of our industry. So with that, I want to thank you for your time commitment this morning. And with that, I will hand over to Darren Whereat.

Darren Whereat

executive
#2

Hello, and thank you, Renato. Good morning, everybody. My name is Darren Whereat, and I'm the Chief Advice Officer at IOOF. And I want to thank you certainly for your time today. Over the next 30 minutes, it will be my pleasure to talk you through our strategy and our program of work, not only of what we believe the business will look like in 2 years, but more importantly, some of the milestones that we have achieved over the last 18 months as we've integrated the ANZ Wealth business and the IOOF Advice businesses together. And our vision is to make financial advice available to many more Australians in a much more affordable sense. And we can't do that by continuing to build on the past practices. We think the time is now to do something very, very different. And we're quite excited about the opportunity that lies in front of us, and we believe we've got a great team to be able to get this job done. In August this year, we commenced our transformational journey in respect to financial advice. And so we're really talking about making our network to continue to deliver that quality of advice that they have been known for, but to do it in a more profitable and more sustainable way, whilst making advice more engaging for our clients and as I mentioned, more affordable. Now each of those things are not mutually exclusive. What we are doing is we will achieve all of those things cohesively, and that's how we believe that we will make advice much more engaging and much more affordable. We know that research indicates that there is a price point for those in the Australian population that don't currently engage with us. And at the moment, 1 in 5 Australians are engaged with an adviser. Renato just shared with you some great research about those that are already in the system and how much more comfortable they are from a well-being sense and a financial sense. But what that actually means is 4 in 5 still don't engage with advice. And so there is an opportunity to augment what we're doing today and to allow others to access the great benefits that in advice do. But as I said earlier, you can't do it by continuing to do what we've done in the past. And so we need to look at new things. So the opportunity for ourselves, opportunities for the public and opportunity for shareholders, I feel, is immense. And I will take you through today how we're going to phase into that. We need to embrace new technology, new ways of working and new processes, and we will be [Audio Gap] and other areas that are under way. I'll finish up by painting that picture as to what our business will look like in 2 years, but also really take the time to walk you through the strategy on where we have been in the journey because we have been on this journey for a number of years. And we think the opportunity for IOOF is enormous, particularly as the market continues to fragment. But before I do this, I would like to take you through some of the achievements that we have done. I know some of you will be sitting there thinking, how are they going to integrate the MLC Advice business, how are they going to take advantage of what this transaction presents. And over many years, IOOF actually has a history of successfully acquiring and integrating Advice businesses. And we've done it as recently as the 31st of October 2018, when the IOOF businesses, 700 advisers, 3 AFSLs, were merged with the ANZ Wealth Advice businesses, whereby they also had 700 advisers and 3 AFSLs. So the combined businesses, 7 licenses and 1,400 advisers, and so over the last 18 months, we have been putting these 2 businesses together. We prioritized stabilizing the business, as Renato mentioned. We brought our -- we prioritized our investment in assurance and governance. And we've also streamlined the processes and invested heavily in technology. So at the time, we did make the decision to prioritize the movement to a single advice assurance and governance model. And this would lay the foundations for us to transform the business. And it's an important aspect because you cannot run 7 AFSLs 7 different ways with 7 different processes. And so we made the decision, over that 18-month period, to actually move to a single assurance and governance framework, and we've actually achieved that. So I'm sitting here today with that successful integration of those 2 businesses, both of its 700 ARs, both bigger than the opportunity that the MLC Advice transaction affords us, with 400 ARs. We've actually combined those businesses over a reasonably short period of time. More importantly, but we now have one way of doing things. So in terms of our advice standards, that are the rules, if you like, that are employed in the owner-and-operated space, in the self-employed partnerships, where we partner with self-employed planners, the way that we operate and provide advice, the way we supervise and monitor our advisers and the way that we ensure that we don't get in a repeat of any of the issues that were highlighted in the Royal Commission, we are ensuring that our risk framework is easily identifiable and within the risk tolerance that the organization is set. So we have 7 businesses, but we only run 1 advice process. Now how do we do this? We actually achieve this by bringing together the 2 shared services business from IOOF, the traditional, and the ANZ, and we brought them together to create a single way of doing things in terms of our enablement functions. So we centralized our research functions, our Xplan functions, our resources in terms of our CPD, which is our ongoing education, the way we bring advisers into the business and the way that we exit advisers out. So all that infrastructure required, that we used to have 2 ways of doing things, we now have a single way of doing a thing. And that's very important as we move into the next opportunity that the MLC transaction affords us because we've built the business to be scalable. And like we will with the 1050 community and the GPL community, we can bulk AFSLs and bulk other advisers into our system, but we still only run that single advice process. And that's the way that we're going to ensure that we don't get a repeat of the past. So we have streamlined businesses, multiple licenses, we are still committed to running multiple licenses, where they can operate at scale and operate in a different segment of the market, but we're doing this in a way that builds scales and efficiencies into the model. So we've built a strong network of training and support in terms of our CPD. We've embedded our assurance and governance program, lifted our professional standards. We now have a single model that's been independently assured by an external firm, PwC, to make sure that we are operating at the required level of the regulator in and around the market. Now we are wearing this as a bit of a badge of honor because we know that those advisers and clients that are operating under our AFSLs are safe. We know that our framework has been rigorously tested and independently assured, that it is operating at a standard that we believe is leading the market. To ensure that we don't get any repeats of the ongoing fee revenue issues that we're seeing in terms of the remediation programs, we were the first to announce a public move to fixed-term agreements. And what that is, is each and every year, our advice clients will reauthorize their fees for the advisers. So every year, there is a conversation around the services that they have received, the services that they will receive, and the client reauthorizes those fees. So the remediation programs that we've seen in and around the market, we've adjusted our processes, invested in technology and changed the way that we're engaging with clients. We believe Advice 2.0, the next evolution of advice, is about bringing the clients closer to the advice process and giving them confidence and building that trust in and around the advice processes. So we've commenced our journey on our, what we're calling, our digital ecosystem. And the reason I'm so excited about the advice opportunities in terms of the opportunities that both MLC and the new way of doing things is that we're not just building on past processes. We're investing in technology, but we're making sure that the client is the center of all the decisions we made. And we think the work that we've done in terms of streamlining the model, as I just walked through in terms of our enablement businesses, will put us in a position to continue to run a multi-Advice business, a multi-brand strategy, particularly where they operate at different segments of the market, but we're going to do this in a sustainable way. On the 31st of August, we announced changes to support the sustainability in terms of our AFSLs. And each of these 3 pillars need to act cohesively for us to be successful under the Advice 2.0. AFSL sustainability is really about moving away from the old industry model, where there was cross-subsidization and product subsidization in the Advice AFSLs. We've been very public in our decisions to move to making sure that each of our AFSLs, whether it's in the owner-operated space or in our partnership spaces, each cover their own costs at a minimum. And in the owner-operated or the employed space, we are looking for EBIT of 30%-plus. Now for us to ensure that we do that, we have to make some big decisions. And on the 31st of August, we did announce some big decisions. And now principally behind this, there was a decision to ensure that we were -- had a big presence in the owner-operated model or traditionally referred to as an employed model. We're not talking about bank-employed models, but we're talking about Shadforth, which is a high net worth business that has been operating in that space and as the preeminent brand in that space. We're talking about Bridges, great relationships in the channel that really is working with those external parties in respect to the credit unions, and we're ensuring that the ongoing services that clients have been promised are delivered. But we are talking about doing that at scale, and we're talking about doing it in a different way. In terms of our multi-brand strategy in the middle, we're talking about unique value propositions by using technology to remove costs and processes. And the support for more streamlined deliverable really will mean that we need to be sustainable in the way that we're operating our AFSLs. There is no opportunity to do client engagement and adviser efficiency if we don't have a sustainable model into the future. And we will have that model breaking even in terms of our AFSL businesses by the '21, '22 year as previously communicated. Now we did make some hard decisions that we communicated to the market back in August. And these changes reflect the need to move to a new model. The above-the-line decisions there are about the structural changes that we made, streamlining our resources, and the below-the-line decisions there reflect the decisions that we made in impacting on the AFSLs. Combined, these decisions will extract year-on-year from the '21, '22 year, as previously communicated, $10 million worth of costs out of the Advice businesses. And it's important for us -- now for me to walk you through these. You can see that when I talk about the structure, previously, we had our multi-brands, which is on the left-hand side here. With the big decisions that we've made are in terms of Bridges, we made the decision to sit it side-by-side with Shadforth, but operating in the mass market as a wholly owned-and-operated AFSL. Presently, it's combined owner-operated and operates in the self-employed. And so from the 1st of October, we've been working with those people that had self-employed businesses under the Bridges brand. We've been working with them to transition to one of our other self-employed brands, which appear below, from the 1st of September. That body of work will be finished at/or around 31st of March next year. And what that will mean is then we'll have 2 owner-operated brands: high net worth space, Shadforth, a great business that's been operating in that space for a number of years; and a mass market opportunity in terms of Bridges. What we're going to do here is ensure that we focus on delivering high-quality transformed advice in a sustainable way. We are aiming for EBIT over 30%, as indicated by Renato, and these combined entities will be generating over $90 million worth of recurring fees from -- authorized from clients. So a huge opportunity to do something different that we've been doing in the owner-operated model, but more importantly, to do it sustainably and at scale. The opportunity to bring in MLC Advice affords us another 100 authorized representatives, along with the ongoing revenue, and we will be able to plug it into that owner-operated model. And we are excited about that opportunity, if approved by the regulators, that, that transaction affords us. In terms of the self-employed market, you can see there that our -- previously, we have multiple brands. Now when we were transforming our businesses, we needed to ask ourselves, are we comfortable with a multi-brand strategy. We've got Bridges, Lonsdale, Millennium 3, Consultum, RI and FSP. We made the decision that we are absolutely committed to a multi-brand strategy. Why? Simply because it represents, particularly in the self-employed space, the community aspect of a self-employed partnership model. And each of these businesses have around about 200 authorized representatives, with the exception of Financial Services Partners, which I'll talk about in a minute. And what we're doing here is we are respecting the communities and the brands and allowing those advisers to partner with us, as I said, but behind the scenes, we are running a single advice model. And so we are committed to multi-brand, but a single approach. And that's how we're going to make our model more sustainable. When we looked at running this more sustainably, we actually asked ourselves, is there 2 natural groups that these licenses could sit together, and the answer to that was yes. So from the 1st of September, we've reorganized the front of our business in terms of that self-employed. And we've gone into 2 groups, and we've collapsed the 5 AFSLs down to 2 distinct groups. The first group is Lonsdale, Alliances and Millennium 3. Each of these have a significant third-party working in and around their business. In Lonsdale, it's accountants. They're very big in the accounting space. Millennium 3, the DNA was in and around general insurance brokers. And Alliances is where we're partnering and providing services for those businesses that have their own AFSL. And so we've grouped those businesses together and reorganized it to operate under one CEO. And on the other side, in terms of RI Advice and Consultum, more in that holistic advice space. Again, we've moved 2 separate businesses to be operating under a single CEO. We're comfortable that those businesses, we're operating at scale and has a large brand presence. And we did, at that time, critically evaluated our other licenses. And we did make the decision to close the AFSL in terms of FSP and helped those advisers transition to another of the AFSLs. And again, that work will be complete on or around the 31st of March next year. In all of those transitions out of Bridges and FSPs, they are exactly where we thought they would be, and we're having great success in working with those planners to move them to another license. So in terms of what we've actually closed, we are closing the FSP AFSL, and we've also completed previously the closure of the Elders AFSL. And so for us, this is our more streamlined business, which gives us a great opportunity in that owner-operated space, but ensures in that self-employed space that we're moving towards covering all the costs in those businesses from the '21, '22 year, specifically in respect to those businesses that came across from ANZ, which obviously came across with running at/or around about a $20 million loss. And as I said, this is our pathway to ensuring they break even. So they are the structural changes that we made, and they are the changes that we -- really now affords us the opportunity to concentrate on the other 2 pillars. We don't get that luxury of focusing on the other 2 pillars without making these structural changes. And as I said, collectively, each of the 3 pillars, it's important that we implement and actually have the strategy for each 3. So the other 2 important aspects here is about client engagement and adviser efficiency. And I'm really hoping, by the end of this presentation, you share my enthusiasm for just why we believe that we can make this work. In terms of client engagement and adviser efficiency, I think now is the opportunity where technology is really catching up to where the idea is. We believe now that the technology that underpins advice can be used in conjunction with delivering the advice by a human in terms of either our employed model or our self-employed partnership space. And it's that human element with technology that really is going to make a difference. So what we're talking about here is we still have a program of work in terms of our transform, where we critically looked at the way that advice was being prepared. Now IOOF has a history through client-first of critically evaluating the way processes sit behind and lead to a client outcome. And so we're using those philosophies to actually have a look at the way advice has been provided in the past and how we can improve the production of advice. It's fair to say, since the Royal Commission, with the compliance additions, that there's been an increase in the time it takes to prepare and document advice under our best interest duty. What we're doing under Advice 2.0 is we're looking to automate many of those processes by using technology. And we made a big play on the 31st of August when we acquired 100% of the shares in our Wealth Central, who was a partner of ours, a fintech that we've been working with for 4 years, and we acquired all their systems and it is now a proprietary system that will only be available to our advisers, be they self-employed in our partnership space, working with us with their own license or in our owned-and-operated channels. And what we've come up with is what we believe is, what we're calling, the IOOF Advice Playbook, which is a way to run your business, which is client-enhancing, much more efficient and offers EBIT of 30%, and that is irrespective of which channel you are operating in. And this is the exciting bit for mine, this is how we are going to make advice work. So let's have a look at the IOOF Advice Playbook. You can go through this slide yourself. I'm not going to walk through it. It's about goals-based advice. It's about using reengineered processes, and I think that's very important. We're not using technology over old, dated processes. We're critically looking at ways that we can improve the client experience, improve the exchange of data. The advice process is very dependent upon the relationship an adviser has with a client and the efficient exchange of data, particularly around the client's current circumstances. And I'll walk you through the process shortly on just how much time we've been able to save by using this technology and looking at the processes. So the enhanced client experience is about taking out inefficient processes, making advice more affordable, and we believe by doing that, we can grow the pie for advice. And that is a very important point. We're not talking about reengineering the way that advice is currently being provided in that 1 in 5 that engage with it. We are generally talking about growing the advice pie. The demand for advice is there. We believe that we can make it more affordable and actually more appealing to a larger segment of the Australian public. So the enhanced client experience, and you'll see in the middle there, the important bit about this is it has in-built smarts. So the guardrails required to manage risk is actually being built into the technology. And so that mitigates risks to ensure, again, no remediation programs into the future, and it's underpinned by technology. And you'll see a number of our technology partners there in terms of Iress, Wealth Central, which I'll take you through in a second, but also the IOOF Platform and the other platforms that we utilize in the advice space as well. So to strip out cost efficiencies and any of the waste, we're looking to simplify and digitize the client experience and automate processes, allowing the advisers to focus on the human element. So we are embracing the robo aspects that the technology provides, but we believe that's best served being delivered by our humans in terms of those traits, such as empathy, understanding and the traits that, that value of advice research has reinforced, that are highly regarded by the consumers of advice. So on the 31st of August, we talked about Wealth Central, and we acquired it. And we are very excited about the opportunity that this presents us. And again, in our demonstrations of the power of the software with our MLC advisers, Chris will take you through where we currently stand in respect to that. But what I can share with you is that this is a game changer. This is what's going to make us different to others. There are software out there. I will not run away from that. I believe this is the most integrated software with the most highly engaged client experience from both prospecting through to the review process. And for us, it's a game changer. So I'm actually going to talk you through some of the opportunity this affords us. So the opportunity is for our advisers in our employee channels, which will be implementing this right across the Bridges and the Shadforth owned-and-occupied space, but also in that self-employed space. And again, it will be only for those businesses that choose to partner with us given there are -- that it's a proprietary system. We've been working with the external vendor for 4 years, and we will continue our journey to evolve this. The way we build this software through our innovation lab is, in my eyes, unique. Why? We're taking input from advisers. We're observing focused groups from clients. We're making sure that we're building stuff that works, demystifying advice, bringing clients closer to the process, taking, if you like, the spooky magic out of advice. And what we're doing here is we're really recognizing that there is an opportunity for individuals that go through the advice process to understand the value advice much earlier on in the process. And so this is why we believe it's game changing, not just for the efficiencies, but for their enhanced client experience. So what we've got here is just the 3 segments. And I'll talk to you about the experience that our clients get. For those of you on the line that might want to have a play around with this software, I encourage you to go online to ioof.com and go in our Community page. This is where we provide a pro bono advice right across our networks, and we delivered over 1,000 hours of pro bono advice during COVID using this software and our networks of advisers, both employed, owner-occupied and also the self-employed. You can go in there and have a play around with the Wealth Central system and get your own wealth report. So in this prospecting and engagement phase, what this is about is removing the inefficiencies of exchanging information. When we were designing this a number of years ago, we were observing advisers -- sorry, clients and it was a cumbersome process to exchange information right upfront. It was very paper-based. It often was dated. And so what we've designed here is an online portal that the client can go in and update and provide an exchange information with their clients during the prospecting and engagement stage. It's online, cyber secured, as you would expect, but what it actually does is it actually provides information back to the clients. So as they put information into the system: their name; where they live; how many dependents they've got; their superannuation; their retirement savings goal, be it short or other goals, short, medium or long term, it actually enables them to put that in. It's digitized, and it's actually all icon-driven. And what they can actually do is generate their own wealth report. Now what this actually does is it's connected to census data. It's connected to RP Data in terms of values of houses. And it takes imagery. It also provides them with a snapshot based upon what information they've put in, under general advice, on how advice may actually help them. It might be about protecting their loved ones in the event of the -- of an event. It might be about savings. It might be about any other thing to do with cash flow management. And what this actually does and the unique thing is they can print this off. It's a bound and glossy brochure that they can take away and have as part of the process without any cost. In exchange, what we've got is a more efficient way of updating the information through the portal. But whether they proceed with us or not, IOOF has given them, or one of our adviser partners has given them, an insight to the advice process in an efficient way for free. And whether they come back to us or proceed straight away, we believe that's a much more enhanced impression. And what we're doing here is try to improve and gain on the trust deficit there is in respect to advice. We want to show them that advice has a positive impact, both in terms of their wealth and their health. And this is our way of doing that. And this advice portal enables us to do that. In the middle there, this is really what it's about. So the information automatically flows from the prospect in terms of the engagement, so the client's got a much more engaging experience. But in the middle, when they come into that meeting with their adviser, that first meeting, often it's about the exchange of information. And from an adviser's aspect, they spend the first 45 minutes of that first meeting, in many instances, making sure and validating the information so that they can go away and deliver an SoA, which, really, it covers off where advice and what strategies they are going to implement. The new way of doing it through the Wealth Central technology, in the middle, around this discovery and advice phase. What this enables us to do, based upon the information that's being put in by the client and augmented by the adviser, it will instantaneously model in front of the client strategies in respect to how they can invest their money, be it superannuation or non-superannuation, in different tax structures that we just spoke about, but also how they link it to the goals that they put into the Wealth Central software. And what we're doing in this middle, by instantaneously modeling it, the adviser is brought into the process much earlier. It's much more engaging, but more importantly, the value of advice is actually up on the screen or on a computer in front of them. And there, they can change the model. So for [Audio Gap] phase, there's generally this trade-off between longevity and income or how long will my money last versus how much money can I spend. And what you can do through the software is you can actually change the different examples on how much money you can have or whether you want to leave a legacy, and the adviser can model this and more importantly, the client can actually see the trade-offs. And so this for us is the new way to show the advisers -- for the adviser to show the clients how advice can be a benefit. And then there's the ongoing review stage. So everything we do now is through this software. And for us, it's a game changer. It's a real efficient way to delivering an enhanced client experience, more importantly, by making sure that the client is brought into the process much easier. So just to give you an example here, how much efficiency are we talking about here, Darren? How are you going to make the advice delivered? On the top, you can work through this, this is the old process on typically how an advice process worked: sit down with your clients; update the information; key the information into a system; go away and do some modeling. You can follow that yourself. Down the bottom is that process that I just spoke about, online digitized portal with giving real-time information back to the client instantaneously. The adviser doesn't need to double key the information in. The system will model into different strategies. We've actually modeled in one of our AFSLs using Shadforth. We estimate that there is 1.5 hours per review being saved by the use of these enhanced processes. So these client-first processes are taking out 1.5 hours of clunky processes and automated these. Just in Shadforth, just in one of our AFSLs, and remember, we have 7, and we're about to -- hopefully, with the approval of the regulators, add the MLC, GPL, 1050 and MLC Advice brands into this community. So just in 1 channel who do 10,000 reviews a year, we believe that we will save over 2,000 business days of efficiencies. Now that can be used in a number of ways to grow the demand for advice or to continue to improve the EBIT that we're generating right across the industry. But we're doing this, not at the expense of the client, we're doing it in a harmonized process, making sure the client experience is first rate. And so this is where I get really excited about Advice 2.0. We've spoken about the efficiencies, but now we're talking about the real client experience of making advice more affordable, more accessible, but also more engaging. Now that is a significant saving in anyone's language. But that's the tip of the iceberg. If we actually have a look at this, that's 7 -- sorry, 6 stages of the advice process. We're just talking about how the system has improved 1 phase. We've got other phases that we will go through using the client-first processes to improve everything that we've got here. And for mine, this is really the exciting part in what we'll be able to do. So just to wrap up there, in terms of what our business will look like in a couple of years' time, we see that we want to be a successful advice-led wealth management organization. That means that we will have representation in each of the 3 key segments of the market. A professional services owned-and-operated, where we'll be operating the Shadforth, the Bridges brand, and we'll be putting MLC Advice in there. This will give us the opportunity to run 300 professional services authorized representatives in that owner-and-operated space, generating EBIT above 30%. In that middle, we will have breakeven AFSLs from the '21, '22 year, covering the cost and making sure our partnerships in that space, where we currently have about 1,000 advisers, and we will grow that with the 1050 community and the GPL community, to about 1,300, we'll make sure that we cover costs. But more importantly, we're going to make sure that our technology investment is scalable right across our enablement business and our investment in technology. And that's why it's important that we partner in those self-employed spaces to make sure that we can deflect our costs over a much larger number of advisers. And scale does matter in the advice space. And in that third space, it's about self licenses. So we do have a business there called IOOF Alliances, where we are actually delivering advice services to those with their own license. And if we do move down to a scenario where the government said, everybody goes self-licensed, we would simply pivot our business out of the self-employed, and with everybody having their own license, we would become a service business. So we would have our owned-and-operated and we would have our self-licensed businesses with all those advisers in there. So we are setting our business up to manage any regulatory risk, but more importantly, that's how our business will operate over the next 2 years. So thank you for your attention today. And I hope I've given you and got you excited about the opportunity about the advice, in particular, in respect to the Wealth Central. The technology that we feel will marry up with the delivery of advice and change the way that advice will be delivered to more Australians in a more affordable way. But rather than me actually continuing with that, I just want to share with you a video from some of our advisers that have been the early adopters of this technology. [Presentation]

Darren Whereat

executive
#3

Thanks, Rachel.

Rachel Scully

executive
#4

Thank you, Darren, and thank you to everybody who has asked questions or given feedback. Now I do note that on the external stream, some slides on the video, they are appearing particularly blurry. There is a high-res PDF version available at the full presentation deck on the ASX, and that has links to high-res versions of the videos as well for you to follow along with.

Rachel Scully

executive
#5

So now, just some questions that have come through for Darren. So a couple from Andrei Stadnik of Morgan Stanley. Darren, are owned advice EBIT margins scalable, i.e., can EBIT margins approach 35% if more financial advisers take up the owned by the IOOF model?

Darren Whereat

executive
#6

Thank you for that question. Look, for us, with the technology, I wouldn't like to restrain ourselves and say 30% is the number. I don't know what the future number is, but we do know that it is scalable in terms of adding on other AFSLs like the opportunity with the MLC Advice, and we can certainly scale it right across. But into the future, we -- technology -- the way technology is going, we think there is opportunities, but I don't know what those numbers may be.

Rachel Scully

executive
#7

Great. Second one from Andrei Stadnik. How will the self-employed financial advisers deliver suitable returns for IOOF shareholders? What changes are required along the value chain to do this?

Darren Whereat

executive
#8

Yes. Another good question there. So we've been very vocal in our move to equalizing the risk, if you like, that the AFSLs have and the financial rewards. So the bottom line is the advisers in that self-employed space, there is a rerating in terms of how much they pay as the old subsidies move out, and we were one of the first ones to move away from that. So the reality is, we've already opened up conversations with our advisers. There is recognition that they will be paying more for the services they traditionally get from us. The way that we're actually doing this by -- and this comes back to some of those structural changes. A lazy way for us would have been just to say, well, x dollars, you need to pay x dollars more. But what we're actually doing is we're looking at the way that we are structured and making sure that we are an efficient partner in terms of our structure so that when we go back and ask for more money, we're not only delivering more services like the Wealth Central solution, we are absolutely crystal clear on how efficient we're running our business. And so that exchange and that partnership model is where we're going to exchange fair value. But the advisers will need and will be contributing more for those services that they had in the past.

Rachel Scully

executive
#9

Great. Thanks, Darren. A question from Matt Dunger at BAML. Why have some of your fast-growing competitors, for example, net wealth and hub, been so successful in winning new members? And how will IOOF advisers win new members?

Darren Whereat

executive
#10

So I might deflect that one there, Rachel. That is not necessarily an advice-related question. I think that might be more suited to the next session in terms of Evolve for Mark to answer. Both of those businesses don't run advice businesses. That is not necessarily an advice-related question. I think that might be more suited to the next session in terms of Evolve for Mark to answer. Both of those businesses don't run advice businesses.

Rachel Scully

executive
#11

Yes. Good point. A couple of questions from Nick Burgess of Baillieu. A target 30% EBIT margin for salaried advice. What EBIT margin do Shadforth currently achieve? What is the rough time line for 30% margin for salaried advice?

Darren Whereat

executive
#12

Yes. Look, on both of those, the combined entities, the compliant owned and operated entities are achieving that 30% EBIT. So across Bridges and across Shadforth, we currently got them running at that EBIT in terms of that target as well. So the time for that is now.

Rachel Scully

executive
#13

Thank you, Darren. Another one from Nick Burgess. It appears your competitors are not as focused on advice or advisers, do you see an opportunity to grow adviser numbers over time post MLC to well north of 2,000?

Darren Whereat

executive
#14

So I'll answer that in 2 parts. First of all, I'm glad everybody else has taken their eyes off the advice space because it gives us an opportunity to, one, reaffirm our commitment. And again, I think the advice reset that we've just done and the feedback we're getting, we will be the voice of advice because we genuinely feel it's a service that the community will benefit from, and we can balance up the shareholders' risks in terms of delivering that. In terms of upping our adviser numbers, my focus is not necessarily on adviser numbers. What I'm focusing on over the next 2 years is making sure that the businesses that we have are as efficient as possible. So for instance, I'd be more than happy to have half the number of advisers that are twice as efficient because I've then got a lower risk base to grow the growth that I'll actually get off that. So I'm not targeting 2,000. We're really targeting efficiencies. However, based upon our experiences with communicating with GPL and communicating with [ 10 50 ] and others in the market we're soon to be resonating with those external advisers, particularly around the technology and the investment in it. And so I think we'll get natural growth as the market continues to fragment. And so 2,000 would not be out of our reach, but at this stage, we are focusing on that efficient delivery.

Rachel Scully

executive
#15

Great. Thanks, Darren. Just in the interest of time, I'll ask him the question, but Darren, you will be back for the old presenter Q&A at the end of the third session. So we'll save some questions for you to respond to then. So the final question for this session, which comes from James Cordukes. For the self-employed model, you say you will reprice to remove cross subsidization and to recognize the risk premium as the AFSL owner. Yet, the self-employed model targets to breakeven. Do you think you need to raise the risk premium even more? Are the risks -- well I'll stop there, and we'll ask it in 2 parts.

Darren Whereat

executive
#16

Yes, sure. And so the answer to the question is yes, I don't think this will be our last move. So we're doing a reset. Obviously, breakeven is our first point, which we said we'd get in the '21, '22 years. That's our first chance. By then, we'll continue to evolve the technology. But ultimately, we would be looking for a return. In that segment as well. That's just in the AFSLs. The other point that is important is the reason it's so important for us to have a presence in that self-employed is that we any investments we make and the enablement business that we've got, the way that we scale out our business will go across a much larger pool of advisers. And so breakeven is the first one, ultimately. But we would -- do want to get a return. I don't know what that return will be, but I need to have a presence in that market because that's where I'm -- the larger volume of advisers are at present, and it gives me an opportunity to spread my cost and make sure I'm more scalable than others.

Rachel Scully

executive
#17

Sure. And following on from the other half of that question, what is the marginal cost of additional advisers, i.e. will more self-advised advisers -- sorry, self-employed advisers, I think he meant, and make you more profitable and less self-employed advisers make you loss-making?

Darren Whereat

executive
#18

Well, the math would indicate that, that's the case. Yes. So if the mix was different, then ultimately, the drivers, in terms of the revenue, are different, and therefore, the numbers that would come out of that are different. So the answer to the question is yes. Again, our focus over that next period of time is to really make sure that we stabilize and transform the way advices provide. We'll be real happy to have 300 authorized representatives post MLC advice coming into our employee channel, 1,000 or 1,300 when we put [ 10 50 ] and GPL in that middle space, and the growing presence in that deal at the dealer. That's our aim over the next 18 months. After that, then certainly, we'll come back and recommunicate what it might be post that.

Rachel Scully

executive
#19

Fantastic. Darren, thank you very much for the session. Our next session will commence to 10:45, focused on Evolve. And Darren, we'll see you back for the Q&A at the end of the third session. Thank you very much.

Darren Whereat

executive
#20

Thank you everybody. [Break]

Rachel Scully

executive
#21

Good morning, and welcome back to our session on Evolve 21. Before we kick off, I'd just like to apologize for some noise that came through during the intermission there between the sessions. I think that's -- it will prove today why we like to keep technology in-house and use proprietary technology. [Operator Instructions] So now without further ado, I'll hand it over to Mark Oliver. Mark, if you could share your screen. And welcome.

Mark Oliver

executive
#22

Thank you, Rachel, and good afternoon, everybody. Hopefully, you can see and hear me okay. Thanks, Rachel. My name is Mark Oliver. I'm Chief Distribution Officer, which essentially gives me leadership of our distribution and product capability for IOOF. I'm also the Executive Sponsor of Project Evolve, which we're really looking forward to sharing with you over the next hour and taking your questions. I -- from my history, I've been with IOOF for close to 6 years. And previously, with over 20 years in global wealth specialists around the world, in Australia and the U.K., integrating acquisitions and also developing new adviser and client products. Shortly, I will introduce today's speakers. But first, I wanted to take a few minutes to outline what Evolve is and some of the goals that we have set ourselves around Evolve. As the slide talks to our -- the Evolve project itself is in basic terms, an enterprise-wide program of work, which is really focused on delivering what matters to our clients. And it does that by creating a single go-forward platform for our retail and our advised and our workplace products and services. Now we believe that we are unique in the retail market, certainly, and we believe in the broader market in delivering that single environment for all employer super, direct retail and advised members and products. And if you keep in mind that those labels that I've just mentioned actually aren't recognizable to the investors themselves. They are labels that the industry puts on those cohorts. And we also acknowledge that those members or investors will actually, through their lifetime, fit in one or more of those cohorts. So for example, he may join the super fund through an employer. They then, later in life, may take on an advice relationship. And subsequently, move into retirement or, in fact, build an investment portfolio outside of their retirement savings. And so our offers allow them the flexibility to move between those products with minimal friction and, importantly, for us to be able to service their changing needs really efficiently and consistently. So our key messages today will be that Evolve is very much here today, and it's growing quickly, and ahead of our full migration of heritage products or legacy products. Evolve is much more than just an IT replatforming initiative. It's actually about enabling a number of IOOF strategic pillars or strategic drivers. And well, it delivers value and great service and outcomes for our clients. As Renato mentioned at the opening, we have an overall goal of reducing the cost to serve and making capacity for innovation through simplification of our operating environment. And ultimately, delivering on our ClientFirst, which is essentially where we eliminate waste or the things that our clients don't value to spend more time with clients on the things that they do value. In its current phase, Evolve 21 is a single platform ecosystem for all IOOF heritage products by the end of calendar year 2021. And so that will entail 2 migrations occurring in mid and late calendar year '21. And in essence, what that does is streamline our current array of 73 products down to 13. So you get a sense of the simplification and the opportunities that presents to focus our attentions on development and innovation. This then opens up clearly further opportunities for consolidation of both the P&I and the to-be-acquired MLC business. Now Evolve is already the home for our IOOF-branded workplace offers or employer super products. But today, we're also seeing strong uptake in the new Evolve product adviser products, which were launched over the last 2 years, and they include products branded Shadforth portfolio service, eXpand and IOOF Essential. And having been launched over the course of the last 2 years, they've now garnered over $4 billion and about 10,000 client accounts in that time. In fact, our new account openings, as the chart show, on the right-hand side, new account openings on Evolve now exceeds both our Pursuit and our heritage suite and they did that during the course of late 2019 as the overall number of aggregate new accounts in IOOF continues to grow. So as you'll hear this morning, we're very proud and excited about the unique ecosystem that we're building. And important to point out that it's an ecosystem that we own and control. While our clients will always determine what value looks like, we believe it's really important for us to retain the flexibility and the agility to respond to their changing demands. Essentially, we don't want to put ourselves at the mercy of an outsourced platform provider, their frailties or fragilities and their priorities for that matter. And we'll show you some very concrete examples of this in action later today. But while the system we've built under Evolve is our own, we do obviously engage with others to help us understand what matters to our clients and prospects. And in fact, in the Evolve development process, we continue to work closely with members, advisers and, in fact, the general public, to inform on new features, new functionality and the all-important user experience and help us prioritize some of those aspects. But to ensure we remain focused on the quality of our platform service overall for the key financial adviser market, we look to Wealth Insights for their detailed and unique independent research. Over the last couple of years, as we've been developing Evolve, Wealth Insights continues to regularly review the IOOF Pursuit platform, which is our outgoing heritage infrastructure and will be replaced by Evolve by the end of 2021. Now Pursuit in those surveys continue to show great progress across some key service attributes and currently sits fifth out of 15 overall amongst competing platforms on overall service. That's a number of factors that are taken into account there. In fact, 75% of advisers rated it 7 out of 10 or higher. And we think that, that can only improve with the ongoing rollout of the Evolve's suite of products. Now obviously, we would expect that Evolve products will be surveyed by Wealth Insights in their future reports. They usually take place around April or May of each year and are in market shortly after that. Now just sticking briefly with the Wealth Insight's research. One interesting aspect and the reason we continue to use them as a real bellwether of satisfaction in the market is their 2020 research, which looked at about 800 different financial advisers across the market and surveyed over 20 -- about 26 in [ flat ] service features, which Wealth Insights cluster under 10 key attributes. Now in analyzing those attributes, the power of Wealth Insights is their ability to drill into not only what advisers see as crucial to them and important, but also what actually does drive their satisfaction. So looking at some of the implicit matters that are considered. And they do this, Wealth Insights, through a complex set of regression analysis to reveal and say not only what they say, but what actually drives the overall satisfaction for advisors. And these elements tend to take prominence in the areas that we focus on in our quest to deliver what matters. And if I was to sort of summarize, it would suggest that the bells and the whistles of platforms, extensive investment menus, sophisticated trading tools and the like, are nowhere near as impactful on satisfaction compared to well integrated IT systems, prompt and efficient service from call centers and, of course, client value for money. In fact, whilst the individual IT and web attributes surveyed by Wealth Insights, of which there are half a dozen or so, individually didn't rank particularly highly, so 11th, 14th, 17th and 8th. When you collect them together, when you bunch them together, they actually -- this IT and web functionality is the single strongest bearing on whether an adviser rates a platform well or not. So to today's speakers -- sorry. I want to make sure I'm still on. Today's speakers, to underscore the enterprise-wide nature of the Evolve project, in this session, you're going to hear from several of our leaders across the business. All of these individuals contribute, along with their teams, to the success of Evolve. And in fact, they and their respective teams are also beneficiaries of Evolve in serving our clients. Now each of the speakers' functions and capabilities are complementary, but we do all have one single focus, and that is delivering what matters for our clients. That's what I call the client first way. So this morning, I'll first pass to Cable Rickard. Cable is General Manager of Product, and we'll showcase some of the features of Evolve that are in market today, focused on delivering what matters or solving problems or pain points for our advisers. Cable will pass to Sharam Hekmat. Sharam's our Chief Information Officer, and he will showcase the unique technology underpinning the Evolve suite. And finally, he'll pass to Frank Lombardo. Frank is our Chief Operating Officer, responsible for the delivery of our service and support to those 3 cohorts I mentioned: direct members, our advisers and employers. And he'll speak to how Evolve is helping bring this critical service element of IOOF to life. All 3 speakers in this segment have 5 or more years experience with IOOF. And interestingly, all 3 of them have also worked at MLC prior to joining IOOF. As Rachel mentioned, they'll have time for questions at the end. So if you can hold your questions till then. And I'll pass over now to Cable.

Cable Rickard

executive
#23

Thank you, Mark, and good morning, everyone. As Mark said, my name is Cable Rickard, and I'm the General Manager of Product at IOOF. I've been in the industry for over 15 years now, having previously worked at Aviva, UBS in London and MLC. I've been with the IOOF group for over 9 years now, and I've been heavily involved in all of our major platform transformations, integrations, acquisitions and product initiatives. Today, I'm going to talk to you about the Evolve platform, the journey so far and how it's enabling improved client outcomes through efficiency, sustainability and our ability to innovate. I'm also going to share a number of short videos with you that will help showcase the Evolve platform. Within our [ IOOF ] heritage business, pre-P&I, we have operated 2 core platforms. But over the last 5 years, we've been heavily investing in the Evolve platform, creating the go-forward platform to house all of our proprietary products, everything from MySuper, to Retail Advise, Super and Pension and IDPS solution. We spent considerable time, a number of years ago, building out the core foundations of a platform. We rebuilt the tax engine, the fee engine, the way the investment menus would operate. We relaunched and rebuilt the client site, the adviser site and the licensee site. We have then been [indiscernible] releasing features, as you can see from the top half of this slide. And we've done that progressively over the last few years. As I said earlier, the Evolve platform has historically been one that has housed our workplace and MySuper solution. Since 2018, we started to introduce retail advice platform and products. And those products already administered some 10,000 client and near $4.5 billion worth of funds under management. As we come into 2021, the Evolve project will see a consolidation of our 2 core registry system. Upon completion, and we expect to complete at the end of next calendar year, the Evolve platform will be administering north of 260,000 clients and near $40 billion worth of funds under management. I'm shortly going to show you a short video that will help demonstrate just some of the ways the Evolve platform is addressing pain points, creating efficiencies and adding value to advisers and their ability to add value to their clients. [Presentation]

Cable Rickard

executive
#24

Thanks, Mark. In a changing world of compliance, technology and business challenges, the one commodity no one gets more of is time. Considering the efficiencies managed accounts can enable, we're seeing a growing number of advisers consider managed accounts. They can offer and do offer a range of benefits, both to advisers and to clients, whether they be enabling the timely response to changing markets, reducing compliance and admin burden or improving client engagement. We've had a managed account solution on Pursuit Select for some 2 years now, but earlier this year, we extended our managed account solution on Evolve. And it's already gaining considerable momentum and positive feedback. I'm shortly going to show you a short video that will demonstrate just how easy our managed account solution is to implement. And the benefits it can have for both advisers and clients. [Presentation]

Cable Rickard

executive
#25

Apologies there. We don't -- apparently, we could hear the sound, but unfortunately, you couldn't see the video. Just a reminder that those videos are embedded in documents that are available on the ASX release that you could view in your own time. As you saw in the first video, with a modern functionality and a contemporary user experience, we do offer a leading proposition in the market as advice businesses continue to change and their client propositions continue to change. I'm now going to hand over to Sharam Hekmat, who's our Chief Information Officer. Sharam will shine a light on the modern technology and the thinking that has underpinned the Evolve platform. Thanks, Sharam.

Mark Oliver

executive
#26

Sharam, before you start, just make sure that the operator can get your slides working. I'm going to stop the share and restart it.

Sharam Hekmat

executive
#27

Sure. Good to go?

Mark Oliver

executive
#28

Operator, can you confirm that Sharam's slide is now showing?

Operator

operator
#29

Yes, it's working, sir.

Mark Oliver

executive
#30

Thank you. Go ahead, Sharam.

Sharam Hekmat

executive
#31

So thank you, Mark and Cable, and good morning, everyone. My name is Sharam Hekmat. I'm the Chief Information Officer at IOOF. Today, I'm going to talk briefly about the exciting technology that underpins Evolve. Next slide, please. I'd like to start by summarizing the 6 key benefits of Evolve as a contemporary platform for serving our clients. First, Evolve is an important enabler for reducing our technological complexity. By consolidating onto a single go-forward solution to satisfy all our platform needs, we are reducing the number of systems in our portfolio, and hence, the overall complexity. Second, Evolve is enabling us to reduce the cost of doing business, not only in IT terms, but also product and operations, which ultimately benefits members as well as shareholders. Third, one of our key objectives in creating Evolve is to create capacity for future growth. In other words, we are very conscious of the fact that the needs of a growing business like ours are best satisfied by a modern platform that looks beyond current capacity requirements. But more on this later. Fourth, Evolve is developed with business simplification in mind. We're moving away from a myriad of products on multiple registry systems onto a smaller and simplified set of products on a single registry system. Fifth, we've adopted the ClientFirst. We are working throughout our business, which Frank Lombardo will shortly talk about. Within operations, ClientFirst we are working is enabled by a bespoke solution that has been developed using Evolve technology. And finally, Evolve is a wholly in-house developed and owned solution. We've adopted this approach because we want to be in control of our future and not at the mercy of a vendor whose interest in the long run might not align with ours. In developing Evolve, we've adopted a state-of-the-art software architecture. If you look at the history of the evolution of software architecture, earliest applications had a monolithic architecture that consisted of a central system, typically a mainframe plus database that was accessed using [indiscernible] terminals. Such legacy systems are still in use today. The next generation of applications were client server where a client was typically a PC on a user's desktop that connected to a central server in a [indiscernible] center. This was a good step in load distribution and scalability. More recently, market services have become popular as a more scalable means of building enterprise servers. Evolve's architecture is represented by the stack on the far right of this slide. It delivers unparalleled flexibility and scalability by extending the market services concept to the front end using the concept of micro frontends. And because of this, we believe that Evolve is at the cutting edge of modern software engineering. We have intentionally avoided building a partial solution by putting a shiny front end in front of an outdated back end. Evolve is a modern end-to-end solution. So what are microservices? Put simply, rather than developing a large system such as Evolve as a monolithic piece, we've divided it into hundreds of smaller components that can exist in the room right but communicate and collaborate to deliver the required business functionality. Think of each market service as something that implements a well-defined business task such as authentication, switch, withdrawal, rebalance and so on. This architecture has significant benefits. It's not only highly scalable, but also highly fault tolerant. If a service fails, the rest of the system is unaffected and continues to work. Because market services are decoupled, the overall design is simplified and easier to maintain. A key engineering benefit is that services can be developed, tested and deployed independently. This makes the architecture highly suited to agile development, which is how we work. We have many agile teams who work largely independently on separate services. Finally, reusing third-party services to gain development speed is straightforward. All we need to do is wrap the third-party service as a market service and add it to our solution. I mentioned the scalability earlier, so allow me to explain why it's so important. There are 2 distinct methods of scaling a system. The first method is called vertical scaling, shown on the left. This is how you scale all their monolithic systems. Because the system must run on a single server, your only means of scaling it up is to increase the power of that server with more CPU and memory. The analogy for this is a skyscraper. You can create more floor space by adding more floors. In both cases, there is a hard limit that cannot be exceeded. The second method, horizontal scaling, shown on the right, gives you almost unlimited room for growth. To grow the capacity, you simply add more service. The analogy for this is a city, which can grow not only upward but also outwards to create space for tens of millions of people. Evolve is designed for horizontal scalability, and that's why we're confident about its ability to future-proof our business. In designing Evolve, we've paid close attention to the proper design of the user experience or UX for short. This is important because good UX can make a system a lot easier and more enjoyable to use, thus, lifting productivity. To achieve this, we've developed a global experience language, or GEL for short, as a shared framework to give all our digital services a consistent look and feel. As I mentioned earlier, we developed all our user interactions using micro frontends, which delivers similar benefits to what microservices do for the back end. Additionally, we support all popular end user devices, be it a desktop, laptop, tablet or smartphone. But importantly, we've adopted the progressive web app, or PWA for short, start-up development, which means that we can support all popular devices using a single code base without developing native apps for Apple and Android. Because micro services are decoupled, the overall design is simplified and easier to maintain. A key engineering benefit is that services can be developed, tested and deployed independently. This makes the architecture highly suited to agile development, which is how we work. We have many agile teams who work largely independently on separate services. Finally, reusing third-party services to gain development speed is straightforward. All we need to do is wrap the third-party service as a market service and add it to our solution. I mentioned the scalability earlier, so allow me to explain why it's so important. There are 2 distinct methods of scaling a system. The first method is called vertical scaling shown on the left. This is how you scale all the monolithic systems. Because the system must run on a single server, your only means of scaling it up is to increase the power of that server with more CPU and memory. The analogy for this is a skyscraper. You can create more floor space by adding more floors. In both cases, there is a hard limit that cannot be exceeded. The second method, horizontal scaling, shown on the right, gives you almost unlimited room for growth. To grow the capacity, you simply add more service. The analogy for this is a city which can grow, not only upward but also outwards to create space for tens of millions of people. Evolve is designed for horizontal scalability, and that's why we are confident about its ability to future-proof our business. In designing Evolve, we've paid close attention to the proper design of the user experience or UX for short. This is important because good UX can make a system a lot easier and more enjoyable to use, thus lifting productivity. To achieve this, we've developed a global experience language, or GEL for short, as a shared framework to give all our digital services a consistent look and feel. As I mentioned earlier, we developed all our user interactions using macro front ends. which delivers similar benefits to what microservices do for the back end. Additionally, we support all popular end-user devices, be that desktop, laptop, tablet or smartphone, but importantly, we've adopted the progressive web app or PWA, for short start-up development, which means that we can support all popular devices using a single code base without developing native apps for Apple and Android. One of our key design principles is not to reinvent the wheel. So to this end, Evolve has a very flexible plug-and-play capability that allows us to easily integrate best-of-breed functionality, be it third-party or in-house developed. By way of examples, we've integrated portfolio clouds, portfolio modeling functionality into EVOLVE. The MDA solution that cable attempted to demonstrate earlier is powered by portfolio cloud's engine. We recently integrated a customizable chatbot sourced from Intercom. We've partnered with Deakin University's machine learning lab who assisted us in developing automated demand classification for ClientFirst. And more recently, we've developed in-house machine learning solutions for things like automated signature comparison, form scanning and classification. All these solutions have been successfully integrated into Evolve's microservices architecture and are currently in active use. I now hand over to Frank Lombardo to present the client's first way of working.

Frank Lombardo

executive
#32

Good morning, everybody, and thank you, Sharam, for that sort of very insightful piece on our technology, and I'll look to build on that. Frank Lombardo, the Chief Operating Officer for IOOF. In addition to working at a number of organizations, I've spent 30 years in the industry with the last 5 at IOOF. What I can say is that I've worked in -- across products, operations, projects and transformation. And in addition to working at different organizations, that's given me a real sense of what's most important when it comes to the teamwork and having a deep alignment around what's really important when it comes to strategic initiatives at any point in time and working together to deliver outcomes for our clients. At the beginning of my journey with IOOF, I felt this, and to today, feel quite privileged at the support that I was provided in being assigned the task or be it, broad to the organization to help to transform the client's experience and the service delivery from IOOF to our clients. It's been a while since I've talked to you at an Investor Day. And what I'd like to do is to do a quick refresh. What's it all about. You've heard the word, but let's just spend a little bit of time just unpacking the word, ClientFirst. I want to share with you what we've done in the last 4 years. And finally, what I want to do is share some of the results. These indicate to us that we are absolutely on the right track. Products, operations and technology working together is more than a platform. In my team -- across clients and process, I should say, and for the team members within ClientFirst, it's all about delivering a unique human experience. And unless all the pieces of the puzzle that support you are working harmoniously at that moment of truth, when the client is relying on you to deliver what matters to them in minutes, it all has to come together. I'm especially proud of our purpose, understand me, look after me, secure my future. If you recall, when I launched the ClientFirst strategy, I talked to you about the fact that we listen to and did the work for over 5,000 client demands, and the purpose was born from that work. It's a simple purpose, understanding, look after me, secure my future. It's written from a client perspective outside in thinking, if you like. But it's very powerful, and it's a very high standard. And the work we've been doing over the last 4 years has been all about bringing that to life for our clients in those moments of truth, in every interaction that we had with them. We empower our people to deliver what matters. We have redefined roles with added tools. We've increased their knowledge. Most importantly, we've created a system of work that allows decision-making rights at that point of contact, that point of contact that is closest to the client. We have built new capabilities, as Sharam has just talked to. Those capabilities not only enable us to deliver what matters to clients and to work in this new way of working, but also provide the data and the insights necessary for ongoing improvement activity. Finally, the role of our managers and leaders. We've redefined the role of the leader. It's all about being in the work. The only way that you can remain relevant to clients and to our people used to be in the world, in the trenches, if you'd like. That's led to a flat-up structure. Today, I can confidently be here and tell you that we have scaled a highly personalized experience for all clients. It's all about a cohort of one. What matters to you is individual and it's unique. That's what we mean by delivering what matters. It's about delivering that unique individual experience to you. It's client-agnostic, it's channel-agnostic, it's location-agnostic, it's product-agnostic. It's agnostic to the demand at that moment of truth for you as a client. At the center peaks is single-point accountability. End-to-end ownership for the client demand without any handoffs. This is unique. I have worked in organizations where that personalized experience is the domain of your highest, most valued clients. We have developed a system of work that enables us to deliver that to every client. So what have we done? The unique ClientFirst operating model has evolved, redefining each and every role in the team. It involved multiskilling every -- each and every single team member. We've done that through building a learning and development capability as well as introducing new tools to help us deliver and distribute knowledge to our people when they need it most. We've collapsed the front and the back office, if you like. We do not run a traditional call center and functionally specialized administration teams. That equals handoffs. We cannot deliver that client experience that I talked about with those handoffs. Equally, Mark talked about ClientFirst removing remote waste. The design of the operating model is -- has been all about removing waste in the pursuit of delivering a differentiated client experience. Sharam talked to you about new tools. One of those tools is our CRM and workflow, we call it Rocket. Rocket empowers our people to work the way that I've just described. It has been built in the Evolve ecosystem. It is embedded in that ecosystem and integrated into the underlying platform and other capabilities that we choose to introduce into that ecosystem. That's proven by the introduction of robotic automation, AI, chatbot, knowledge management and speech analytics. Sharam talked to the reduction in time and the efficiencies. Cable talked to a withdrawal request being able to be completed within 15 minutes. That is true online for advisers when the demand is received by them, but it's equally true if that demand is received by a non-advised client into ClientFirst or, in fact, is received by an adviser into ClientFirst. When we started this journey, it took over 5 days on average to complete a withdrawal. The knowledge management system is enabling us to distribute knowledge to our people at home in an easy-to-digest format, whilst they are on the phone with clients with a Google style search engine attached to it. The speech analytics is enabling us to lift unstructured data from calls and combine that with the structured data from our CRM at workflow, from the underlying platform and from any system that we integrate into the Evolve ecosystem. Primarily, it's creating the efficiencies so that we could spend more time talking to clients. What that does is drive richness and intimacy and more valuable client data. We are growing our financial education and well-being team. This year, we appointed a GM of financial education and well-being, Anthony Caneva. Anthony comes to us with an advice and digital background. This team also includes a scaled Advice team. But Anthony's main priority is to leverage those capabilities that I just talked to, to deliver a digital proactive experience for our members. The combined IOOF, P&I and MLC business will have approximately 1 million nonadvised members. Anthony and the team are focusing on building digital capabilities to engage with those members in a way that drives a deeper, more intimate relationship. We're also partnering with Darren Whereat. You've heard about Advice 2.0. The work that we're doing with Darren is leveraging the knowledge that we've built from ClientFirst and applying that to our Advice businesses. In addition to the work that Darren's outlined and the technology capability that Darren talked to, we believe further efficiencies and an improved experience can be delivered through removing waste and duplication in the advisor office in the same way as we have done through ClientFirst. Finally, growing our digital capability. We are currently doing that through what we call test-and-learn pilots. What Anthony and the team are doing is engaging with our members through pilots and double, we're doing this testing the response as we start to build -- as we start to think through and build the future of the digital experience for our members. Just to share with you, the screen on the left is the Rocket system, the CRM and workflow that both Sharam and myself have talked to you this morning. What I wanted to share with you on this slide is that this capability is ready now for the future of flexible work. In fact, we could not have moved seamlessly in a COVID environment to work from home without these capabilities. These capabilities enable our employees to choose when and how they want to work. This is a minimum standard for all organizations today. We're there today. The front end, so the Rocket system, with front-end, the platform administration system currently, front ends both the legacy, our pursuit platform that Mark and Cable spoke to and the new Evolve product suite. So if you like, it shields the client -- it shields our people from the underlying system. And through microservices, integrates seamlessly to enable our people to deliver what matters to clients. The key point that I raise is that this is a proof point that we can commence the client-first transformation for both P&I and for the MLC business, prior to and in parallel with the product transformation, product rationalization. We can front-end those legacy administration systems with that -- with Rocket, the new CRM and workflow and enable us to bring forward that ClientFirst transformation whilst the rest of the team is working on the rationalization of the underlying systems and processes. Some of the data through 2020, we had, on average, a 37% increase in demand volume. But that, in isolation, doesn't tell the true story. At some point, the demand volume was up to 100% more than the same time last year. April and July were great examples of that where early access to super demand skyrocketed. So the system of work has to be able to cater for an increase in volume, has to cater for and adapt to unexpected change and to variation in demand. What I can tell you is that through the course of the year, over 65% of all demand, every demand into our system of work was completed in one business day. Our early access withdrawals were leading from an industry perspective. At the same time, we increased the amount of time that we spend with our clients, on average, 7 to 8 minutes per call, in many cases, over 10 to 15 minutes per call. If anything we learned in 2020, the importance of human interaction, real conversations with real clients, and we're really proud that we're able to deliver that. At the same time, we managed to keep the average wait time quite low through the 2020 period. So as a whole, we feel in what was probably a one in 100-year event, that our service performance lifted and stayed true to our purpose. I touched on Anthony Caneva and the financial well-being and education team. Through the last few years, we have free capacity. We are reallocating that capacity to value work. That value work includes retention and scaled Advice. Over the last 12 months, the team has retained over 800 non-Advised members and $140 million in funds under Advice. We will continue to invest aggressively in this space. As I mentioned earlier, approximately 1 million non-Advised clients in the combined IOOF, P&I and MLC entity. MPS, a measure that I'm sure you're familiar with. And as Mark opened up with, big, big clients with the adviser, being core member is the ultimate arbiter of our performance. We measure this through NPS. Our member NPS is 46%, and our adviser NPS, 59%. I could also share with you that the adviser NPS for the Evolve product sits at 70%. So we're very confident we are on the right track as measured and assessed by our clients. On the far right-hand side, Bain & Co, who basically introduced Net Promoter Score to the world as a classification system, we consider our current performance excellent, but that's not good enough. Our aim is to be world-class. And it's only once we're world class that our clients are truly receiving the service that they expect from us. Finally, and Mark opened up with Wealth Insights, I thought I would share with you a couple of the key measures for the service parts of the organization, administration support and ease of doing business. For both of those, we set forth out of 15 platform survey. And the gap between the top 4, it's not significant. I am very confident that with the ongoing investment and the maturity of our operating model that we will continue to improve our ranking in [indiscernible]. And just to close my part of the presentation today before I hand over to Mark, I thought I'd share with you the -- some of the feedback we're receiving from our clients. And I'd have to say my 30 years that the level of positive advocacy and feedback, which clients are taking the time to write to us about, is the highest that I've ever seen. We received hundreds of these, and we proudly store them on our Internet site as inspiration for our people to keep going to deliver what matters. I will hand back to Mark now.

Mark Oliver

executive
#33

Great. Thank you very much, Frank, and thank you, everybody. Hopefully, you took a lot from that session. And as I outlined at the start, I'm key in our approach to developing our service and a class-leading service is the delivery and testing of new features and getting feedback from our clients. And I think the testimonials, as Frank said, certainly give us strong encouragement that we're on the right track and give us the confidence to keep going. And these are in addition to the adviser testimonials that Cable had in some of these videos if you're able to see them. So we continue to receive fantastic feedback, particularly around the Evolve suite, and it gives us great confidence for the future. So to close out before we move to questions, I think really the key points from this session have been that Evolve is very much here today. It's growing strongly amongst our advisers and our clients. And it's unique in so far as it's a single offering across a range of different offers from Workplace, MySuper, right through to advised client relationship and non-Super investments, all in one place. And in so doing, it's enabling the whole organization to focus squarely on what matters to our client. And that core ecosystem brings together the latest technology, value-add functionality and what we believe is our differentiated client for service. So Rachel, I'll pass back for questions, and I'll ask the others to join.

Rachel Scully

executive
#34

Great. Thank you very much, Mark. And yes, if everybody else could join back and put their videos on. So thanks, Mark. We have seen overwhelming demand for this virtual briefing from shareholders, analysts, other interested parties and from our people at IOOF, future colleagues from MLC, which has caused increased bandwidth demand when it comes to the video live streaming. But however, as Cable noted, I do encourage you to rewatch using the links on the public PDF, so you can really see the benefits and points of difference on our Evolve technology.

Rachel Scully

executive
#35

So Mark, first question, we might say, turn to you -- this was asked at the Advice session earlier but thought it was more appropriate for this session. Mark [indiscernible] asked, "Mark, why have some of your fast-growing competitors, for example, Netwealth and Hub, being so successful at winning new members? And how are IOOF advisers with new members?"

Mark Oliver

executive
#36

Yes. Well, I think the point I would make is we do continue to win new members. And if we look at the industry, I think Frank really called out well in his session that us and a few others have a large existing client base, and they remain a significant focus for us. For us, that will continue to be a tremendous area of focus, if you think, of the growth of some products have come from movement across the industry, if you like, flow between providers. We're really focused strongly, not only in continuing to grow, but also to nurturing the substantial stock of members that we have and a number of our competitors haven't had the client base to be spending that time on.

Rachel Scully

executive
#37

Great. Mark, another question for you. "The external platforms, for example, BT Panorama that IOOF gets revenues on, are there any further risks to these revenues in a world where cross subsidies are being reduced? Are you planning to bring more of the fun from this on to Evolve?"

Mark Oliver

executive
#38

Look, I think really our clients will be the key arbiter of that. In terms of those arrangements, we are confident that they are fit for purpose into the future. But ultimately, what we want to offer our clients is choice. And we have a unique perspective on how the market is operating to also focus on uplifting our proprietary capabilities. So I think it's really the best of all worlds that we can offer our clients and advisers choice across a range of market-leading offers, but also continue to inform our own proposition.

Rachel Scully

executive
#39

Great. Thanks, Mark. Cable, a question to you. "How much [indiscernible] admin will there be on the combined platform post integration? So I believe that means post completion of Evolve."

Cable Rickard

executive
#40

The completion of a Evolve 21, which will see the consolidation of our platforms from 2 to 1 and our product set from 73 to 13 who have made $40 billion worth of funds under management and about $0.25 billion customers, around 260,000.

Rachel Scully

executive
#41

Great. Sharam, a question for yourself. "IOOF is widely considered to have old technology and a lot of legacy technology issues. How would you respond to that?"

Sharam Hekmat

executive
#42

Well, if you go back many years, that might have been true, but over the past few years, we've built considerable capability internally to develop the Evolve platform. And I would say that the team that we currently have is actually one of the best in the country. And the fact that they've been able to develop this completely in-house, a very advanced solution which is market-leading, is evidence that, that statement is just not true. I think the view out there in the market is totally outdated and not on par with our current capability.

Mark Oliver

executive
#43

If I could add to Sharam's answer because I wholeheartedly agree. I'm really passionate about this one. And maybe our reflection is that we, as an organization, haven't done a good enough job talking to our capabilities, and that's what we're here to do today. But having led operations teams for a long time, I can tell you that the partnership that we've got with Sharam's IT team and the agile way that they work is delivering capabilities faster to the team than I've ever seen in my life before. The early access to Super was an incredible example where they responded almost within a weekend to deliver new capabilities to -- in the face of Huge demand, never seen before in the industry, position us to preserve what we think is industry-leading service. The proof point of the tech capability are numerous, and it's a myth that we are here to debunk today because it's simply not true.

Rachel Scully

executive
#44

Yes. Thank you, Frank. And final one for Mark before we wrap up, "When can we expect to see Evolve right in Wealth Insights data?"

Mark Oliver

executive
#45

Yes. Thanks, Rachel. I think as I tried to outline in the opening, we will expect that to be surveyed in the '21 survey, which I believe is in field of April, May, so published results usually shortly thereafter.

Rachel Scully

executive
#46

Great. Thank you, Mark, Frank, Sharam and Cable. The guys will be available for Q&A after the end of the third session. So thank you, guys, again. And the next session begins at 12:00 focusing on transformation in IOOF. Thanks again, guys.

Sharam Hekmat

executive
#47

Thank you.

Mark Oliver

executive
#48

Thanks, Rachel. [Break]

Rachel Scully

executive
#49

Good afternoon, and welcome back to IOOF's third and final session of our investor briefing. Again, I hear that there was a bit of a clash of 2 streams during the break to the 2 sessions. So apologies for that, it seems that we got overlapped with another live stream. So our final session is around the transformation and Chris Weldon and Mel Walls will be taking us through the presentation. Questions, as always, can be submitted via the link at the top left of your screen or e-mail directly to me in advance. And thank you for those who have sent through questions to the other presenters as well. We'll endeavor to get as many answers as part of the Q&A session at the end of this presentation. So without further ado, I'm handing over to Chris Weldon. Chris, go ahead.

Chris Weldon

executive
#50

Fabulous, Rachel. So thanks for joining us here for our last session of today. My name is, as Rachel mentioned, I'm Chris Weldon. I'm the Chief Transformation Officer at IOOF, and I'll be joined today by Mel Walls, who is our Chief People Officer. I've had over 16 years experience at IOOF and MLC. And during that time, at IOOF, I've led a number of our business integrations and change programs. I have background that spans both products and clients and process and have a very deep understanding of the business. In this session today, we're going to provide an overview and update of our transformation and integration activities. I think a lot of the things that you've seen in the sessions before, you will have noticed the thread that does tie those together. And the aim of this session is to sort of bring it all together. I'm going to start by providing a short recap on the MLC transaction. And then share some of the lesser-known insights as to why we think we can move at pace with that integration. I'll explain how the MLC and ANZ pension and investments, which I think we referred to this session as P&I, why those acquisitions can leverage strategy of investment in Advice, technology, people and process. I will share how we're approaching the integration and provide an update on the progress we've made today, which I'm sure many people are really interested in. And then I'm going to hand over to Mel, who'll provide, I guess, that's probably the most important update which is an update on an aspect of our business, I think, isn't well understood either out of the market. And it's how IOOF's unique culture is really supporting our transformation into a leading financial well-being business. In this session, we're going to try and share as much information as we can, but there will be some areas where we will be limited in the extent of the information that we can share at this point in time. And following the session, Mel will hand back to Renato Mota, our CEO. And we'll be joined by our other presenters for the questions. So if you have questions around transformation, you can certainly ask them or myself or Mel but the other presenters will be with us at the end of the session as well. On the 31st of August this year, we announced the acquisition of MLC from that. This was an opportunistic acquisition, and one that is going to position IOOF at the forefront of the industry. The MLC business is highly complementary to both IOOF and our recent acquisition of the ANZ P&I business. MLC brings with it a number of advice businesses. While -- whilst we're not acquiring the licenses, the advice businesses itself is highly complementary to our existing offer, and Darren touched on some of that in his earlier session today. They bring with them a range of platforms across both Workplace, simple and comprehensive advised platforms. And again, they are complementary to the platforms, which either way, operates. They also bring -- MLC brings that the MLC Horizon series and investment capability, management capability that is complementary to IOOF's strong multi-manager capability. In addition to that, MLC is also adding direct asset management capability to our business and asset consulting capability into our business as well. Those similarities and consistencies are important when we consider how we're approaching our integration program. And also importantly, underpinning all of those is a consistency in the culture that we're observing across all 3 businesses, MLC, ANZ P&I and IOOF, in a desire of its people to deliver great outcomes to clients and secure their financial futures. Following the completion of the MLC, you would have seen in this slide before, we have presented this previously when we announced the acquisition of MLC. But the important thing to note is that post the completion of the acquisition, we will be the -- we will have the largest footprint of advisers in the country. We will have the largest platform from -- in the country. And we'll be second large -- largest range superannuation assets in Australia. Through that scale and some of the things you've heard earlier today, we can reduce the cost to serve and generate benefits for both our clients and our shareholders, in an increasingly what can be a competitive market. We're going to achieve that through our transformation and integration program. And certainly, the aim is to leverage off our investment that we have made in advice, technology, people and process. Before we can move any further, I think it's important just to take a moment to understand some of the aspects of the MLC acquisition that mean that we think we could move a relative pace with that integration. Firstly, there are limited interdependencies between the MLC Wealth business and MLC Life. In 2015, NAV come into the program of work, to separate the Wealth business at MLC from the Life business to accommodate the sale of MLC Life to Nippon, and allow the 2 businesses to operate independently. And that has been largely occurring since 2017, and there are now only limited transitional services arrangements in place between the 2 organizations. There is also limited interdependencies between the Wealth business and the bank. Work commenced in 2018, a program of work was undertaken by NAV to separate MLC from NAV to facilitate either a demerger or a trade sale. A trade sale ultimately was emerging with -- through south of IOOF. That program of work can now be leveraged, to support the separation of MLC from NAV and reduce the period of time, which we need to rely on transitional services arrangement. So thinking about it, they haven't waited until the sale start that process. They actually commenced that 2 years earlier. Also in preparation for a demerger or a trade sale, MLC has undertaken a lot of work to simplify and improve the competitiveness of its products. Competitiveness has improved our investment in digital capability, improved product features and more competitive pricing. This has resulted in recent improvements in client retention. Complexity has also been removed. With MLC reducing a number of RSC licensees from 3 to 1 and a number of superannuation funds from 10 to 4, noting that of those 4, 2 are private labels. As a result of this, we're acquiring a business that has far less legacy, I think complex arrangements embedded within it, which means that we can get on with the job integrating in a much more timely manner. In respect to the advice divisions, as we've already noted, we're not acquiring the Advice licenses, which means that the liability and remediation activities remain the responsibility of that. This will allow IOOF to spend -- focus more effort on continuing to improve our advice proposition and improve the efficiency and sustainability of their Advice services. And lastly, there's no doubt that this acquisition and the integration program is a complex one. To help us with this, we do have some experiences. This is not the most important thing, but it does certainly help. There are a number of senior personnel and also less senior personnel within our business that do have experience across both MLC and IOOF. Some of them include our Chief Operating Officer, a Chief Information Officer, our General Manager of Product and National Manager of Product Development and Digital Experience, and our program manager for Evolve, who Cable and Sharam spoke about earlier, prior to joining IOOF earlier this year, was Head of Technology at MLC. And of course, there's also myself. As we said -- as you would have picked up on the theme through the presentations today, the purpose of transformation integration is to leverage off IOOF strategy and maximize the investments we have been making in Advice technology, people and process. So let's look at some practical examples of that. Darren Whereat spoke earlier today that the investment we've been making to Advise 2.0 to enable our advice businesses to operate more efficiently and sustainably. A great example of that was our investment in Wealth Central. That technology can now be leveraged and applied across an additional 500-plus advisers, following the completion of the MLC acquisition. The Evolve technology platform, which Sharam, Mark Oliver and Cable Rickard spoke to you about earlier today, that technology is capable of supporting direct to consumer, workplace, simple and comprehensive adviser needs in a single ecosystem. We will be able to leverage that technology investment to improve the product and service offering to MLC and ANZ P&I clients, and their advisers and employers. And to do that, we will leverage off our existing mature and ongoing product simplification integration capability. We have a program at work, which Cable talked about earlier, which is planning on consolidating all of IOOF's heritage products and by the end of 2021, that is a mature capability that we have stood up and is running very effectively with the additional specialist resources from LLC and ANZ P&I. We're about to augment that and continue that program of work to integrate the products and services quickly and leverage the technology investment that we have made a bit of a whole. Frank Lombardo had talked to you about how we've transformed our client service model with ClientFirst. The foundations of this approach can now be extended to improve the service experience for clients across both MLC and ANZ P&I. Our investment in growing and developing our financial education well-being program can be extended to -- -- again, can be extended to both MLC and ANZ P&I clients, which, as Frank mentioned, will be in excess of 1 million customers following the completion of the MLC acquisition. To achieve all of that, we have scaled up our core integration capability, which we developed for the integration of the ANZ P&I business, which I'll cover now in a little bit more detail. IOOF has had a long and successful history of acquiring businesses and integrating those businesses. And I've certainly been involved in quite a number of those integrations. But as we've grown and changed, we've adapted our approach to be fit-for-purpose and with the acquisition of the ANZ P&I business, a transformation and integration management office was established, which had included specialized and experienced resources in large-scale business integrations. With the -- following the acquisition of MLC, we reviewed that this current structure we had in place, and we've further scaled up this capability with the creation of a stand-alone transformation division being led by myself, reporting directly to the CEO. We have a large program of work with a number of individual work streams underway to ensure that we can complete the MLC acquisition as fast as possible, separate both MLC and the ANZ P&I businesses from their respective bank parents and integrate the 3 businesses operations together to maximize the capabilities and realize the synergy benefits. We've resourced up with an additional 40 new roles being added to our transformation capability since the acquisition of MLC was announced. These people will support our experienced business leads from within the organization at IOOF. The way we approach integration is very much supporting our existing underlying business layers that have a lot of experience in integrations, that lie, that you see at the bottom of this slide around source knowledge and expertise for individual streams. We're adding experienced resources around them to support them in the leading of the transformation to deliver a successful integration. There is a high level of road map that we have developed. Again, it's just a very, very high level one. I just want to go through some of the key milestones. The important thing is here that we -- our integration activities and transformation activities remain on track. We completed the full acquisition of the ANZ P&I business on the 31st of January this year. And as you'll see in a moment, we're on track to complete the acquisition of the MLC business by before 30 June next year. In both these acquisitions, the first phase that we enter is, what I call, Protect & Serve. This means taking a proactive approach to ensure that the clients' experience is not affected in any way as a result of the acquisition, making sure that all the people can come in and do their job from day 1. The change experience for our people is minimized as much as possible following the completion of the acquisition. Now the client experience is not adjusted or changed. We do that through identifying key talent and knowledge within the business and making sure that frontline teams are fully supported through those initial phases. Secondly, we need to make sure that any remediation activities that are underway continued and work through at pace. We bring our experience to those programs of work to close them out in a timely manner and ensure that processes are simplified to prevent further remediations in future for clients. Whilst doing that, we're working in parallel to plan out our broader integration road map through sort of product and technology. You've seen earlier today, it's got to feed down through and into that evolved program of work. So we have a program that's already running. We will pivot that program to include the ANZ P&I product set and also the MLC product set and leverage off the technology investment we have made. We will, as part of that program, also consider where appropriate to in-source or outsource depending on how fast we want to move and where our capabilities lie. It will be a multiyear program of work. But as we described, we have a program that's been stood up. It's progressing well already with the integration of IOOF's products and services. We will pivot -- we'll bring in experienced people from both ANZ P&I and MLC to assist with that, and we believe we can move at pace with integrating the products and services from our acquired businesses. The next question, I think, is around how fast are we moving and what sort of progress are we making towards that. Some proof points we can provide today are shown on the slide here. So we announced the acquisition of MLC on the 31st of August 2020. Since that point in time, we had successfully lodged our submission with the ACCC right now, and we expect to receive the response on that on the 4th of February. That date may move out or it might move in depending on responses that the ACCC receive from their public review. We have funded the acquisition through a combination of equity and debt. We successfully were able to do that. We have also agreed on the joint transaction implementation plan with MLC and NAB on the 4th of November, so we've moved quickly to mobilize. And we submitted our first draft, that Section 29 APRA change of control application on the 9th of November. We're now working collaboratively with APRA to finalize that application, and we'll have a better sense of when APRA approval is likely to be received as we sort of progress through that process. All this means that we are very much on track and preparing for a completion as early as the end of March, but it may be -- yes, we're expecting that between sort of April and June. But we'll be prepared for a separation -- sorry, a completion as early as the end of March 2021 because we have everything in -- all the wheels are in motion and we are moving good pace. Another area we've been asked, there has been some interest is how our engagement is going with advisers with the MLC adviser group. There was a lot of activities from some competitors in the market. We're pleased to say we're on track with our retention efforts with MLC advisers and we expect to be able to retain the vast majority. I think Darren Whereat announced that shortly after the announcement went out that we're not arrogant enough to think we will get every single adviser, but we think we'll get the vast majority. This chart shows we moved into it and mobilized very quickly into an engagement program to cover the TenFifty Adviser Practices to ensure that we went out and we listened to what their needs were. So we engaged and we listened with the advisers across TenFifty. And also got the Godfrey Pembroke and the salaried Advice channel through MLC as well. What that enables us to do was put forward a compelling offer that enabled the ease of transition and friction for advisers, provided continuity of things that matter to them. So key process is technology and supported them through the change and recognize the importance of communities and brands and advisers. And so we're really pleased with our progress, and we believe we're definitely on track with our retention efforts here. I think an excellent proof point of that was the recent press release from Godfrey Pembroke where their practice development group indicated their intention to join IOOF. IOOF has demonstrated a commitment and strong belief to the value of Advice. And so we do believe that advisers and listening to advisers means that we are in a very strong chance of retaining the vast majority of adviser remain on track in this space. We completed the full completion of ANZ P&I on the 31st of January this year, and our integration activities for that remain on track. Since February, we've been working with ANZ to separate out the business and progressively transfer people out of transitional services arrangements and across an [indiscernible] employment. By the end of the year, we'll have around 75% of staff under transferred through the IOOF. And we have plans already locked in for the first quarter of next year to transfer further operational staff across into IOOF. In the slide, I think that everybody wants to say, which is around how we're tracking the scoreboard in the numbers. There has been really strong progress on -- in this space. So how does it translate? I think we could have turned up today and there would have been a number of reasons why we could have justified a delay in synergy benefits. We completed the full ANZ P&I transaction on the 31st of January this year. We then got hit with the global pandemic. We made a successful bid for MLC. So it would have been easy to turn up, and say, "Look, we've been distracted by COVID, we've been maybe distracted by a bid for MLC. But pleasingly, that has not slowed our progress. We are on track to deliver cumulative annualized synergies of $43 million in FY '21 with $25 million of new initiatives delivered during this year -- this financial year. That means that around 50% of the overall synergies targets would have been realized from the full data completion on the 31st of January 2020. At this stage, the total synergy target for MLC was $150 million of that target. We're expecting -- and we're targeting a range of around $65 million to $80 million in the first full year following completion. It depends on when that date ultimately falls. But that's sort of full 12 months, we're expecting $65 million to $80 million of annualized synergies to be realized in that first full 12 months. And following the completion, we'll look to sort of -- we will be wrapping the 2 integrations together and providing ongoing consolidated reporting. We do look forward to continuing to provide regulated updates to our progress here. And the key message from this slide is that we remain on track with our synergy realization. So just to summarize before I hand over to Mel. The acquisition of MLC is highly complementary to IOOF's businesses and can leverage the strategy and investments we've been making in Advice, technology, people and process. We're on track to complete the MLC acquisition before 30 June 2021. We're on track with our adviser engagement program. I'm very confident with the progress. And we're also on track with our integration of the ANZ P&I business. We're very confident in our ability to execute on the combined MLC and IOOF and P&I integration, and we look forward to providing regular updates as we progress. With that, I will hand over to Mel.

Melissa Walls

executive
#51

Great. Thank you, Chris, and good afternoon, everybody. I'm Mel Walls. As Chris said, I'm the Chief People Officer. And it's a great opportunity today to have to talk to you about the culture at IOOF and how we're thinking about that through integration. So I'm going to cover today a little bit about the IOOF culture, but also how we're seeing that play out, both with the integration that has occurred as well as that that's coming. Before I do that, I'll just give you a little bit of context on myself. So I've been at IOOF for 14 months now. I have 20 years' experience in HR. And Chris mentioned, there are some of the executive team who have NAB and MLC experience, so I'm one of those people. I have 9 years at NAB, predominantly in the business bank in HR and business roles. So I want to start off just giving you a little bit of a sense about our culture at IOOF. So if I can just get the next slide. And some of my observations when I first joined the organization, So when I came in, I suppose one of the questions on my mind was what shape was the culture in and how fractured had it become in that post Royal Commission environment. And I was actually quite pleasantly surprised to find that the culture was in good shape. And what I described is the core of the culture being really strong. And as I spoke to people and observed what was going on, it really came down to a couple of things. So one was this real purpose-led -- genuinely purpose-led attitude that existed in the business at all levels. And the ClientFirst culture, which was palpable in the organization. And I know that many organizations and many that I've worked in have ClientFirst or customer-first or customer-centric kind of programs. But I haven't seen one like this where ClientFirst is alive every day in the decisions and actions that people are taking from top to bottom that guide the way that work is done in the business. And for that reason, we really see culture as a unique differentiator and competitive advantage for the organization. And I think as context for this session is the ecosystem in which we're executing everything we've talked about and what gives us the confidence to feel that we can achieve what we're laying out. The other thing I've observed is there's actually really strong cultural alignment across the organization. And that's not just from an observation perspective, but we've done quite a lot of cultural diagnostic work over the last 6 months that I'll talk through a little bit more in a moment. And you might expect from a business that's grown up through acquisitions to have subcultures or different ways of working. In actual fact, the cultural alignment that you observed, the attitudes, the beliefs are observably quite strongly aligned, but also through the diagnostic work we did came out as being also very aligned. But although we recognize we have a strong culture, we also recognize that there was an opportunity to really invest in making that very, very clear and being very deliberate about the actions we take on culture to make it fit-for-purpose for the future and the organization will be. So I'll talk a second in some of that diagnostic work and work -- deliberate work that we're doing to help to dial up our culture. So at the heart of this ClientFirst culture and what makes it so unique are a few things that I'd like to give you a little bit of insight on. So the first one is about being client centered -- sorry, people centered. And I think that plays out in a number of ways. So firstly, we've touched on terms like empowerment and responsibility. But there's a real concept in ClientFirst about putting decision-making authority and the ability to service a customer -- a client in the hands of those closest to them. That sense of empowerment and ability to make something better for somebody else really gives a great sense of purpose and achievement to those delivering the work. And what we've seen is that they're really flourishing in that environment. It also means for our clients that it's not a cookie-cutter approach. People have the ability to be serviced on their needs and that looks different to every person. So as you listen to our client calls, it's really one person having another conversation with another person. It's very real, and it's very human. The other thing is delivering what matters. So there's a real focus on cutting out waste, cutting out noise, keeping things simple and just delivering what it is that's going to make a difference to the customer and ensuring that we deliver to that every time and again putting that decision-making authority in the hands of those who can get that done quickest. One of the things we hear most commonly from new people joining the organization is just reflections on how there's a lack of bureaucracy and how flat the structure is. And that's something we do deliberately to ensure that people are able to escalate concerns, questions, decisions get made quickly and that there's no bureaucracy or hierarchy slowing down the ability for the things to get executed quickly. And the other hallmark of IOOF that I've noticed is this real agile culture and having worked in a number of transformation environment. It's something that more traditional organizations are always trying to build in. But culturally, it's really hard to achieve. IOOF has that through the history of the way that it's grown up, but the ability to adapt quickly to change direction and to respond really rapidly to changing environments, not just externally, but self-driven determinations of things that need to be done differently. And what we're seeing is, as this ClientFirst culture really grows and amplifies that this is playing out in very positive proof points to our people. So from our last engagement survey, which was conducted in May this year, which was post the P&I integration, our engagement scores went up 12 points to 71%. And other factors also measured in the survey also moved very positively like long-term direction, senior leadership performance focus and alignment. And alignment is about the extent to which people are feeling that we're all on the same page and moving in the right direction. Diversity inclusion is also looking very positive through the way that we measured in engagement. I've pulled out the gender differences engagement there, but across a number of different gender diversity segments that we measure. We're seeing that people experiencing the culture positively despite what kind of backgrounds or groups they may fit into. So they're both our males and females scoring 71% on engagement. Just to note on those scores, I appreciate if you're not in these surveys all the time, some of those scores don't mean a lot, but just to highlight. The senior leadership score at 71% places us in the top decile and most of the other scores are in the top quartile. Engagement sitting just 1 or 2 points outside that. So that's a bit of a snapshot of kind of our proof points of culture, but just a few things on what our people are saying on the next slide. And there's a real sense of pride and noticeable support for the way the culture is evolving and helping people feel like they're getting the best out of themselves at IOOF. So pride is a word you hear a lot when people talk about IOOF. There's a real commitment and personal connection to the organization. But also they're appreciating particularly through COVID, but through all the change that we've been through over the last few years. That sense of support and that the employee experience along with ClientFirst culture is really being prioritized and amplified in a way that we're developing. So if we move to the next slide now, I'll just talk a little bit about some of the diagnostic work, which I touched on briefly before. So as I mentioned, we feel like there's a really strong core of culture there, but we wanted to do some work to just make sure that we're really clear in the way that we're communicating that to people and really deliberate in the way that we want to continue to evolve our culture to be fit-for-purpose in the future. So we engaged an external partner to help us do some of the diagnostic work, which involved surveys, some focus groups and interviews with the Board, executive team, frontline staff, broader employee base and also our customers. One of the observations made through that partner who do this work as their core business was just the level of consistency that came through across all the segments of our business top to bottom and across different areas of the business about how consistently the organization is perceived. So again, that sense of great alignment about what it means to work at IOOF. What came through in terms of what we call a cultural archetype was that the organizational driver for us was about belonging or being an every-person organization. And what that means is that for an every-person organization, we prioritize work or ways of working that mean customers feel that they're reassured and supported in what they need. So put another way that we cater to the needs of every person despite the differences that they may present with. And from an organization perspective and our employees, what that means is that you're free to be yourself. You don't have to fit a certain stereotype to belong at IOOF. We welcome and include difference. We want people to fit in for who they are and is, in fact, part of what makes our organization a rich tapestry that we want everybody to be the best version of themselves, which we believe will be the real version of themselves. And so we believe through this culture, it's one that is very accepting and inclusive of all types of people and, again, really helps to nurture a culture of diversity and inclusion and welcome people from different types of backgrounds. Again, we're seeing that play out very positively in some of the integration that's occurred to date. So on the right of this slide is just some proof points around culture that sometimes get lost as we talk about synergies and numbers, but what's the people experience that's taking place behind some of that synergy realization. And I think it's heartening to see what the employees' experience is. So some of our ex-ANZ employees have been here for the longest period, so through the ANZ Advice transfer. We've seen engagement uplift 22% through that period to 76%, which places that score in the top quartile. When rating the change processes post their transition, our ex-ANZ employees rated an 80% agree on IOOF have a positive and welcoming culture and overall assess the change experience to be a good one. And through the post surveys that we've done regularly with our entire workforce, the P&I employees, just as a touch point, rated 88% on average across our well-being and support measures, again, reinforcing that they're feeling well supported in our environment. I think talent is also an important part of the way that cultural integration occurs. And I think these 2 stats below really show how well that is occurring. So ex-ANZ employees make up 30% of our senior management roles in IOOF. And the turnover rate we've seen of transferring ANZ employees is below industry comparative at just over 8%. So we know that we're seeing some positive proof points on integration and that gives us real confidence for the future. But if we jump to the next slide, I can just talk you through a little bit more about the way that we're thinking about doing this at a bigger scale. So the work that we've done today on really defining and communicating our culture has been really helpful in preparing us to transition a whole lot of people across IOOF. And there's 3 areas we're focusing on, in particular, to help people make that transition successfully. So the first one is clarity. So being really clear about our culture, our expectations and the principles that guide how we all work every day. Again, that's not to say everybody has to fit a cookie cutter, but we need to make sure that people understand what it means to work in a ClientFirst culture. Then there's context, which is about making sure that people understand and can individualize what our culture means for their work and their role. And that's really about making it real for them and ensuring that they understand what a ClientFirst culture means, even if they're in a role that is not touching customers on a regular basis. And then finally, convergence, which is about seeing culture play out in all their ways of working. So the underlying ways of working in systems and processes. So this isn't just lip service. It's not just something that's talked about and put on posters, but it's something they feel playing out in a one way, same way consistently across the whole organization to really bring it to life. In the meantime, what we've been doing over the last few months, if we jump to the last slide, is starting to do work with MLC to ensure that they're understanding what the culture at IOOF looks like. And part of that is really focused around communication. So from the first day following announcement of the deal, so on the 1st of September, we had a whole of company webinar with the workforce at MLC and that's continued each month and is getting about 2,500 people attending those sessions. And we have lots of just open questions, which is something that's very emblematic of the way that we interact with our own IOOF existing workforce, where Renato has a weekly webinar with our people, just very open and conversational where everyone has the ability to ask questions and have things answered real time and that's something we're starting to do with MLC. We're also introducing less formal engagement channels where we're having lunch and learn sessions or leader-led engagement, just in a more intimate session setting to allow people to start to understand what will the future look like and how do I fit into that picture. So far, this has resulted in very positive feedback on communications. MLC employees are typically saying through the surveys, run by MLC, that they're feeling optimistic and really curious to find out more about what the future holds. Part of the feedback we've received from both MLC, but also through the ANZ work and reflections that we've done is about the importance of feeling that they belong to a dedicated wealth management organization and that goes again to that part of a belonging organization that rather than being part of a bank that's much more diverse that to feel they're part of an organization that's dedicated and the whole purpose is around wealth management and financial well-being is something that gives a great sense of comfort and being part of that. Our focus is we support people through change. And obviously, that's one of the biggest priorities for all of us is again continuing to make sure that we've got regular communication and giving people as much clarity about what the future holds as possible. And that's not always possible, but just continuing to make sure that we're open and sharing as much as we can as soon as we can. The other key to change is making sure that we can move with pace. Through change, people don't sit well with uncertainty. So the longest keep people in an uncertain space, the worse that, that plays out from a morale perspective. So trying to give certainty and move -- continue to move the change with pace is a priority for us. And I think finally, just at IOOF, because of the history of the business, change management is very much part of the DNA of all leaders -- of all people. So it's not something that gets outsourced, store is put outside for somebody else to do, whether that's running up to talk to teams or understanding the importance of being able to give clarity or move with pace. These are the decisions that everybody in management roles understands from their history and is very much part of the way that they do work. So I think the -- well, there's a long way to go, there's some strong plans in place to make sure that we're really supporting people as we move through the change that lays ahead in the coming months. I'm going to leave it there, but I'm happy to take questions as we move into the final Q&A. But for now, I'll hand back to Renato for some closing remarks.

Renato Mota

executive
#52

Thanks, Mel, and thank you, everyone. We are reaching the end of the session. And it's been a lengthy session. I think we've covered a lot of ground over the last 3-or-so hours. And what we've, in fact, covered are really some deep dives across the 3 pillars of our continued strategic transformation as a business. And I think it creates a very unique opportunity in the Australian context. increased relevance in the community and I think increased growth prospects for the business, both for the business itself and, obviously, translating to earnings growth over the medium term. Just to close out and really wrap up some of the key messages out of today before opening up to questions. From Advice 2.0, we heard Darren talk about the importance of the 3 pillars in the model, the owned and operated model, the self-employed licensing model and then the self-licensed model. We heard that MLC actually brings us to around 300 employed advisers in the owned and operated model and the commitment to 30% EBIT margins and, obviously, a healthy and large continued self-employed model. In the Evolve session, we heard about the importance of one single operating platform across all clients and really serving the clients through their life journey and really the importance of service and service excellence is a key differentiator and maybe that target of being top 3 both in terms of the NPS. But importantly, the Wealth Insights are key metrics. And finally, we heard from Chris and Mel talking about the transformation through integration, reiterating that we remain on track on all the key metrics despite some of the challenges of this years. And as I started, we've in fact -- I think this year has presented some real opportunities for us as a group. And I think it's been really pleasing for us to sow the seeds and really capitalize on those opportunities over the past 12 months. And we're really confident that with these priorities and this strategic focus, we're actually placing ourselves really well to deliver on the promises, not only short term, but importantly, medium and longer term as well. So with that, I do sincerely want to thank you for your time. It's been a big investment of your time, and we'll open up to questions, Rachel.

Rachel Scully

executive
#53

Thank you, Renato, and welcome back to all of the presenters. So operator, if you could just ensure that all presenters from today are allowed into this meeting room, that would be great. To kick off while we have Mel and Chris, a couple of questions on transformation. Chris, our synergy realization is fundamental to the success of the MLC transaction from a shareholder perspective. Are you really that confident in the synergy target in the current volatile COVID-19 environment?

Chris Weldon

executive
#54

I think the best evidence proof point on that is our current experience with ANZ P&I, which we showed today. We're on track in respect of the synergy realization with that acquisition, which has been achieved in a COVID environment. So we are confident.

Rachel Scully

executive
#55

Great. Thank you, Chris. And Mel, COVID has had a massive impact on all staff. Have you seen a lot of turnover during the COVID period? And how do you go about making people redundant in such challenging times for both emotionally and financially?

Melissa Walls

executive
#56

Sure. Yes, look, it has -- acknowledging it has been a really difficult period, but sometimes challenge brings opportunity. And so I think in some ways, it's allowed us to really dial up our visible support for people and ensuring we're taking through this journey safely. And we've been running webinars and well-being sessions to help them feel that support and deal with the circumstances they might be facing. We've actually seen turnover drop, so it's below 8% now for the broader IOOF organization. Dealing with redundancy in these situations, as it is always, is tough. And so what we do is make sure that we do it with as much respect and care as we can possibly deliver to support people through these tough decisions.

Rachel Scully

executive
#57

Great. Thank you, guys. Some questions on Advice, and we'll probably jump around as the questions come through those. So apologies in advance. But Renato, one for you. Renato talked about his ambition to have lowest cost to serve. Will those benefits be passed on to clients through lower pricing to grow market share and continue to stabilize the business or is that about expanding profitability?

Renato Mota

executive
#58

So Rach -- so that question really goes to the heart of our platform strategy and platform business. I may touch on Advice separately, but it's really important we differentiate the different strategies for different parts of our business. So absolutely, we are committed to ensuring we have loss cost to serve in our platform administration business. I think much of what you heard through today, whether it was from Cable or Frank or Sharam or Mark is about sitting into the infrastructure, the mindset and the capabilities to be able to deliver that. I think historically, it's something we've done very, very well. We've done that through simplifying businesses. We've done that through increasing our scale for acquisition. So in fact, we're very confident we can replicate that going forward. On the Advice side of the business, the dynamics and the strategy are a little different. And I'll say that because we're not seeing top line pressure downwards on the cost of Advice to clients. If anything, there is a real risk that the cost of Advice to clients goes up the other way. Why is that? Well, fundamentally, we believe that the Advice interaction is the most valuable part of the interaction for the end client. And as we saw in the survey results, they value Advice. There is no downward pressure. So the Advice is actually about reducing the cost of delivery to allow either reinvestment to be for realization of an economically viable business model. So the Advice industry in the past was not an economically viable business model as a stand-alone. We do think that there are economics there. We do think we can extract those through the owned and operated model and that's the primary purpose. The primary purpose is absolutely to make sure we can generate a return for our shareholders. Likewise, by reducing the cost of delivery and cost to serve, we open ourselves up to serve a different cohort that may, in fact, not currently be able to afford it. So we actually build an opportunity for ourselves to expand the target market or the addressable market through Advice.

Rachel Scully

executive
#59

Great. Thanks, Renato. A similar question in a slightly different way. If the goal is to remove the cross subsidization across the model, why is breakeven unacceptable outcome for the self-employed model? And what benefit do investors get from running a model that only targets breakeven?

Renato Mota

executive
#60

So the breakeven in the self-employed model is the current target simply because it reduces our marginal cost to serve. I think to the earlier question, which Darren answered, if you're serving more advisers, if you're serving 1,500 advisers for augment sake, the marginal cost per adviser is lower than if you're serving 400 or 500 advisers. So by reducing the marginal cost to serve, it does, in fact, have a positive effect and positive outcome on our owned and operated model. It also creates a really healthy, what I call, platform effect or network effects in your Advice community. Having different ideas, different visions, working with different advisers actually makes our business a more vibrant business. I think to simply back one part of the model, I think is somewhat myopic to the richness of Advice. And in fact, some of the best ideas we have, and as Darren suggested, some of the Wealth Central developments have come from the advisers themselves. So putting out of at the center of that Advice community, I think, makes us a better business.

Rachel Scully

executive
#61

Thanks, Renato. Following on from last question from James Cordukes of Crédit Suisse. Darren, Wealth Central seems to deliver a lot of efficiency benefits. If those are flowing through to the self-employed advisers, can't you monetize that rather than just targeting the breakeven?

Darren Whereat

executive
#62

Thank you for the question. Look, I think the breakeven is our first target, as I was talking about earlier. We want to prove our technology, show the advisers in that self-employed space the benefits of partnering with us through greater efficiencies. From that, the next conversation post breaking even is about a fair exchange for monetization in respect to the technology. So we're not going to put the cart before the horse going to ask for more. We're going to prove it out breakeven because that was our stated goal. And then I think we start up with a very different conversation, one about genuine partnership and a genuine exchange of fair value in respect to what we're saving in their business.

Rachel Scully

executive
#63

Great. Another couple of questions for you, Darren, from James. Becoming more efficient and pulling cost out is needed to deliver an improved EBITDA margin. But how do you weigh that up against offering cheaper Advice and hence opening up the growth opportunity to the 4 out of 5 that don't have Advice? Seems like conflicting goals. And how should we think about them together?

Darren Whereat

executive
#64

Yes. Well, the way I'm thinking about it is twofold. But first of all, we've got 1 in 5 people that currently engage with Advice, and the research shows that they get a huge benefit both emotionally and financially. That for me is what we would call the traditional Advice. And so we're about reducing the cost of preparing that Advice. And we've spoken about that the day in respect to how we're going to do that through the technology. I think the competing priorities would be if you were to cannibalize that market and say, right, well, we're going to make it at a lower price point. What we're actually saying is, we feel we can offer a different experience. You can't have the same experience for a high net worth investor as you would do for somebody with more modest means. And so what we're attempting to do through our technology is to come up with a new model that will engage with, one, another segment of the population that currently doesn't do it. But it won't be the same offer. It won't be apples and apples. It will be a different solution, still Advice in the best interest. But we'll be preparing it in a different way and delivering it in a different way. So what it's actually about, it's complementary because we're looking to grow the demand for Advice. And if you contrast that with the reducing number of authorized representatives throughout the industry that are able to provide Advice, that's where we really think this opportunity to use technology to open up a market that currently isn't being serviced is afforded to those brave enough to go down that path.

Renato Mota

executive
#65

Rachel, just to follow up on that. I think it's a really important point that Darren makes, which is this isn't just about making it cheaper just to deliver, which is a priority. I think to really succeed, and we've seen this in other industries, we need to transform how it's delivered. So we need to do it differently. And I think there's plenty of lessons, whether it's in the entertainment and media industry, whether it's retail, it's not just using technology to do it cheaper. You need to do it differently, and you need to do it in a more meaningful way to your consumers.

Rachel Scully

executive
#66

Sure. Because actually, the next question, Renato, from James, was any more color on current cost -- I'm sorry, the current cost of Advice? And how low do you think you can get it? So I think that alludes back to your similar comment.

Renato Mota

executive
#67

Yes. Look, absolutely. It's making sure that, a, you're making the delivery process as efficient as possible is sort of the first objective. The second objective is making sure that each Advice interactions, it fit the purpose. So for example, if you're serving a 30-year-old with 2 young kids in a mortgage who wants to -- wants a subscription model, that it has to be a different delivery model and different delivery process than someone who's going to retirement, who's a high net worth. What I would say, though, it will leverage off the same infrastructure. So making sure that infrastructure is modular is really important. So as we said, so the marginal cost to serve continues to drop.

Rachel Scully

executive
#68

Great. Thanks, Renato. Sharam, a question for you has come through on the platform. You are not a technology company. How will you keep up with the latest technology trends and the spend required to keep your technology upmarket best?

Sharam Hekmat

executive
#69

You don't need to be a technology company to do those things. The fact of the many is that we do invest quite heavily in technology as a company in order to serve our business. And because we don't outsource our core platforms, we have to make that investment. As a result, we have quite a strong capability on par with some of the best start-ups in the market in terms of keeping up with the latest and greatest tools and technologies to build our systems. So I think I think given the size of our investment, given the size of our team relative to the overall size of the company, we are well placed to ensure that we have access to the best technology going forward.

Renato Mota

executive
#70

Rachel, just to add to that one as well, sorry, I think the complexities in wealth management and financial services more broadly should not be underestimated. So having that domain expertise embedded in technology is a critical importance. So whilst whether we are or are not a technology company, technology is a core enabler for our business. And it's not simply something you can outsource. And I think there's clearly to point in recent history that those that have proprietary technology have been the forefront of the evolution of the industry.

David Chalmers

executive
#71

And Renato, just to add to that from our perspective, I mean, the spend is still quite significant. We spend over $40 million a year. And that's in terms of genuine sort of technology development, that's not including about another $40 million we spend externally on surveys and third parties. So it's in quite a sizable spend. I guess the difference is unlike a lot of companies, you don't see going through CapEx because we put that through OpEx. So certainly, we feel that there's been a strong investment there.

Rachel Scully

executive
#72

Great point from Dave. Mark, what do you consider to be the key strengths and weaknesses of Evolve versus its principal competitors and kind of compete in all market segments?

Mark Oliver

executive
#73

So I think the key strengths, as we've outlined, is really that it's designed with the customer back, I mean, adviser back. So it's reflecting what the modern-day consumer need is and what the modern adviser needs. I think that's unique in the marketplace and also acknowledges that clients' needs will change through time and the corrosive effects of moving wealth around the system is actually one which is still we brought to life with clients. So I think there's tremendous value in that. In terms of weaknesses, we would rather be further along than we are today, but we're going at a good pace and we've got some ambitious goals ahead. But otherwise, I genuinely think we've got something which is really compelling and differentiated and is built fit for the future. I'd say, as Sharam ably talk through the modern technology stack that underpins all our systems and processes and functionality is future fit. It's not -- we haven't just put a shiny front end on old technology. So I think there's some substantial differentiation there. I'm sorry, I forgot the last part of your question, Rachel.

Rachel Scully

executive
#74

So kind of compete in all market segments.

Mark Oliver

executive
#75

We genuinely believe it can and we intend to do so, and we are doing so today. And I think we've got a unique opportunity there to continue on that track.

Rachel Scully

executive
#76

Great. Thank you, Mark. Renato, a question for you regarding financial wellness. And Renato talked about wanting to do more for those entering the workforce. Can you monetize that in the near term? Or is this about lengthening the customer relationship with the dividends of those long relationships more likely coming over the longer term when they can pay for it?

Renato Mota

executive
#77

So it's a combination. So in a simplest form, we already have relationships with those people entering the workforce, and we do that through our employee super footprint. Now admittedly, that's through a product relationship. That said, there is an opportunity that through those relationships to contribute more insights, more customization and mill personalization to those members to buy the product. I think to the hypothesis that I think was being said, what we expect is that we expect to build engender more equity, more goodwill in that relationship, which does mean if you extend the relationship. And at those critical points in time, they are more likely to opt into Advice. We'd like to think because they have a better understanding of what Advice actually means. And we think we see the current challenge in the Advice relationship is that it's got a very high barrier to entry, i.e., it's -- I've described it as a binary industry, the Advice industry, where you pay a lot and get everything or you pay nothing and get nothing. So we need to break that down and to allow people to consume it on a fit-for-purpose basis, which so not only does it extend the product relationship, we think it actually provides -- opens up that target market, if you like, or the addressable market for Advice.

Rachel Scully

executive
#78

Great. Thanks, Renato. Mel, a question for you. When you were talking about giving people clarity, are you able to let MLC or IOOF staff -- that IOOF staff know now if they will have a role at IOOF under the merged group? Or do you have to wait until the transaction is completed?

Melissa Walls

executive
#79

We're working through that now. So certainly, it's not something we want to do or be in a position to do until we have the appropriate approvals in place. But around the time of completion, we will be in a position to share more about what that integrated org design would look like.

Rachel Scully

executive
#80

Great. Thanks, Mel. Chris, one for you on transformation and actually it might be for David Chalmers as well. To what extent is P&I integration impacting revenue margins? And when will you be able to quantify margin expectations?

David Chalmers

executive
#81

So I'll maybe pick that one up. I mean in terms of what we've seen in the integration work so far, we're not seeing that impact margins. A lot of that is coming through those efficiencies of putting the 2 teams together. I think it's a separate issue around, and we've talked around what we see around the flows of P&I and what we're looking to do there. That, I think, is a separate decision or discussion to what we're seeing in the synergies. So specifically, on the synergies, though, I wouldn't see that as being a trade-off between we're getting cost out at the cost of margin.

Rachel Scully

executive
#82

Great. Thank you, David. One, Renato, on overall strategy. MLC on substantial investment management capabilities, will you retain these businesses? Can you unlock value by potentially selling these assets?

Renato Mota

executive
#83

So the asset management business, and if you follow the history of IOOF, we've had a variety of different exposures to that space from perennial, which were -- we founded perennial. We grew Perennial as at the time of leading boutique and then divested it, we've clearly got our exposure more in recent times. We've limited our exposure to the multi-manager in, what I call, investment on solution packaging arena. We continue to learn more around that business. So we're continuing to deepen our knowledge of the boutiques of JANA of the broader footprint. So we're not ruling anything in or out at the moment other than to say that having proprietary investment capability has always been core to IOOF. The nature and the footprint of that has changed over time, and we'll make an appropriate assessment over the coming months between now and completion.

Rachel Scully

executive
#84

Great. Thanks, Renato. A further question received via the platform. I note that neither MLC or IOOF are getting substantial net flows. How do you stop the targeted scale disappearing over time? And I think that the flows point would relate to MLC and P&I. Mark, I might pass to you to start on that one, and then maybe Renato to give some overarching views.

Mark Oliver

executive
#85

Yes. No, I think in plain English, we were mindful to the flow trajectory of both businesses when we acquired them. And so whilst we continue to bring everything together in a single platform, we are mindful of addressing some of the drivers of those flows. We don't need to wait for the product rationalization or system rationalization necessarily to do that. So we'll continue to address them appropriately in the products that they have. But I think the main point is we observed that trend when we acquired these businesses and have factored that in accordingly.

Renato Mota

executive
#86

Right, yes. Look, I clearly agree with Mark. The other piece I would add is that we should not lose sight of the fact that the 4 major banks were large participants in this marketplace up until probably a couple of years ago. And they had been in that marketplace between the decade or 2, let's call it, 20 years. And one of the reasons they've divested they've come to the realization that it's very difficult to run a wealth business when your core business is banking. There has been under investment. And I think that under investment has manifested itself in, yes, their clients leaving the incumbents and to other players and particularly a couple of new entrants. So this is as much around the incumbents being able to deliver what matters to the advisers. And I think -- I'd like to think that from what we've spoken through today, we have a core capability, which we've invested in heavily over the past 5 years. It's scalable, and it is actually positioning to be that incumbent that can deliver to those requirements. And not only is it retaining what it has, it is in fact growing new client relationships. So I think it's somewhat misleading and potentially dangerous to draw parallel of what the banks did and just to quote that to our future direction.

Rachel Scully

executive
#87

Great. Thank you, Renato. And with one minute to go, a final question, and again that's to you, Renato. So you have had a number of exact changes this year, some of whom we've seen on today's webinar. How is this new team positioned to deliver synergies? IOOF, as a business, has a strong track record. But what are your thoughts about this newly appointed team?

Renato Mota

executive
#88

Thanks for the question, Rachel. I'm the first to acknowledge that as executives, we have the privilege of taking credit for a lot of work from a lot of people throughout the organization and the depth of knowledge. We have, frankly, the real domain expertise exists around dealing with really complex issues. I've been really pleased with the addition of the new executives. I think they bring a fresh look on our culture, a fresh look on our capabilities. And a challenge in our organization as a whole in a way that's consistent with our cultural settings, but really challenging ourselves to set ourselves and set our capabilities for a much larger business and one that can continue to excel. So the knowledge exists in the business. Yes, there's been changes in executives, but I think that's generally been additive.

Rachel Scully

executive
#89

Great. Well, thank you all for your time today. With that, it's 1:00, so the briefing has ended. Please do feel free to shoot through any questions via e-mail. Happy to engage later on this afternoon. So thank you all for your time. Thank you for dialing in, and I look forward to speaking soon. Thank you all.

Darren Whereat

executive
#90

It's been great.

Renato Mota

executive
#91

Thank you.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Insignia Financial Ltd. transcript — plus 255,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Insignia Financial Ltd. earnings transcripts and 255,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.