Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (IONS) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
July 10, 2023
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Yaron Werber
analystWell, good morning, everybody, and thank you for joining us for our 2nd RNA Summit. I'm Yaron Werber, on the biotech team here at TD Cowen, and it's a great pleasure to moderate the next session with Ionis Pharmaceuticals with Brett Monia, who is the Chief Executive Officer. Brett, good morning. Right and early on your side. Thanks for joining us.
Brett Monia
executiveGood morning, Yaron. it's a pleasure to be here.
Yaron Werber
analystSo lots to talk about. I want to kick off with eplontersen, especially on the heels of the 85 week data was literally which just got presented showing a nice sustainability now we've seen from 35 weeks to 66 weeks, and now to 85 weeks on TTR reduction and clinical outcomes as well. The PDUFA is coming up in December for TTR polyneuropathy. Can you talk a little bit about the launch prep and how you'll split up the responsibility also with AstraZeneca?
Brett Monia
executiveSure. Happy to, Yaron. These are very exciting times at Ionis. We are making great progress across all the key functional areas of the organization including our commercial products, our development pipeline in our technology. And certainly, eplontersen is a key component to the excitement we're having at Ionis today; excitement that we think is going to bring tremendous value to all stakeholders at Ionis for years to come. Absolutely, we announced some very exciting new data today, our week 85 or 19 month data for long-term treatment of eplontersen in patients with hereditary TTR polyneuropathy. This exciting data builds on our very positive week 66 data that we presented at the AAN earlier this year. The week 85 data today shows that patients continue to improve in their neurological disease endpoints for both mNIS+7 and Norfolk Quality of Life continue to improve with continued treatment. And with a very attractive safety and tolerability profile. Before jumping into eplontersen and getting into the details there, we certainly are prepared to launch assuming approval late this year. But before getting to that, Yaron, maybe I could just touch on and provide a brief summary of where we are today at a higher level at Ionis. We have 3 near-term commercial opportunities today, eplontersen being one of those, which is in development for 2 indications, the neuropathy indication that we just talked about briefly as well as the broad cardiomyopathy indication, and things are going very well in both of those Phase III studies. Eplontersen is being codeveloped and co-commercialized with our partner, AstraZeneca, and we are prepared for launching eplontersen in the neuropathy indication soon after approval, as I mentioned earlier. Our other near-term commercial opportunity is olezarsen, which is being -- also being developed for 2 indications, a rare indication, FCS, as well as for a much larger indication, severe hypertriglyceridemia, sHTG. Olezarsen has now completed enrollment in the FCS trial and the sHTG study is going well. And olezarsen is expected to be our first independent commercial launch for those 2 indications. Our other near-term commercial opportunity is donidalorsen, a prophylactic treatment for hereditary angioedema. We completed enrollment in the HAE Phase III study called OASIS earlier this year. We're looking forward to data readout from that study early next year with assuming a positive outcome of another independent launch potentially late next year. The rest of our Phase III pipeline is also going extremely well, going -- hitting on all aspects, making great progress across the board. And we're very pleased that we recently expanded the Phase III pipeline this year with 8 drugs now in Phase III development across 10 disease indications, all of which have the potential to be first-in-class to the market for various areas where there's a very large unmet need and potentially best-in-class through many of those drugs. SPINRAZA continues to be the market leader, the global market leader in spinal muscular atrophy. It continues to perform very well despite emerging competition. And we and our partner, Biogen, expect SPINRAZA to potentially return to growth over the next couple of years and QALSODY, now a real breakthrough for the ALS community. QALSODY is now our second drug from our platform now on the market for severe neurodegenerative disease right alongside SPINRAZA and QALSODY is now launched, and we can talk more about that. And then on the technology side, we're making great advancements across all aspects of our platform, including additional chemistry, drug delivery and in her areas as well. And this, of course -- these advancements will expand our drug discovery capabilities and maintain our leadership position in the RNA space. Now back to your question about eplontersen. Everything is in place for the launch of eplontersen, assuming approval with a PDUFA date for the polyneuropathy indication on December 22 of this year. Everything is on track. Our U.S. brand strategy is now in place to ensure for a successful and robust launch soon after approval. Our tactical plans are in place. Our infrastructure is in place with AstraZeneca. This includes medical affairs team that's already in the field, preparing for the upcoming launch of eplontersen and polyneuropathy. Market access work is well underway and essentially complete. And we're really putting the final touches on our launch plans as we prepare to go to the market. The -- our role in the launch -- in the commercialization of eplontersen for polyneuropathy is quite extensive. We have a leading role in patient services as well as in medical affairs as well as in the global brand strategy as we launch in the U.S. market. And AstraZeneca will take on the responsibility for some of those aspects, but in collaboration with us, but also, they will be responsible for the field force, the commercial field force in the U.S., and they have ex-U.S., they have -- they will be -- they will need commercialization for eplontersen as well. So we're ready to launch eplontersen. We think we have a great drug. The week 85 data builds on our confidence. It really shows that this drug is very competitive. It has a great profile. And also has a profile that's very differentiated from current treatments that are on the market today as well as emerging treatments. And we can talk more about how this is different -- how we see eplontersen differentiating, and as you wish you get, Yaron.
Yaron Werber
analystAnd by the way, for the audience, if you have any questions, feel free to e-mail me directly or go ahead and chime them in to the Wall Street Webcasting portal and I can read them anonymously on your behalf. Brett, maybe a follow-on question maybe a little technical question. Is eplontersen going to be commercialized by AstraZeneca? Or is it going to be within -- it's going to be within the Alexion sort of business unit? And do they need to hire an additional sales force? It's obviously neuro focused right now, but is it within the broader sales force or it's going to be its own sort of carve out?
Brett Monia
executiveThe co-commercialization and co-development relationship with AstraZeneca is with AstraZeneca proper. We're really not working directly with the Alexion Group today. And what was the other part of your question? I'm sorry, Yaron.
Yaron Werber
analystAnd is it within -- are they hiring? Are you jointly hiring a new sales force?
Brett Monia
executiveThey are -- AstraZeneca is taking advantage of existing manpower and expertise in both neurology as well as in cardiovascular disease, but they're also doing hiring also for the commercial field force. Yaron, you went on mute.
Yaron Werber
analystThank you. I'm typing away. So going to mute intermittently. So we're expecting data obviously soon from BridgeBio, literally it could be any day from their Phase III study. And next year, we're going to get the data from Helios-B. As you're thinking about what you know so far about accumulation of events and you've now powered your study to about 1,500 patients or so. We're expecting the data in 2025 from CARDIO-TTRansform. The other companies obviously are running smaller studies, about 560 and let's say, 640 or so, respectively, BridgeBio and Ionis -- and I'm sorry Alnylam. As you're thinking about the bar for success and the need to have ample sample size, can you talk about both given what you know now?
Brett Monia
executiveSure. Happy to. So TTR cardiomyopathy is a disease that has a prevalence estimated to be about 300,000 to 500,000 patients worldwide. So very significant unmet medical need for these patients suffering from TTR amyloid buildup in their heart, causing heart failure. There's 2 components to this indication. There's the hereditary component of the disease, which makes up a minor fraction of the disease. These are patients with mutations in the TTR gene that promote TTR buildup in the heart and cause heart failure as well as the wild-type indication, which is the much much broader indication. Our trial design, we think, is the -- well, it's absolutely the most comprehensive trial ever conducted or in patients with TTR cardiomyopathy, including contemporary studies that are ongoing today. And we believe that this represents a very significant differentiating -- differentiator for our program and very significant advantage as well for our eplontersen cardiomyopathy program. The demographics in this disease are dynamic and they're changing and evolving rapidly since the approval of tafamidis due to better, more effective, noninvasive diagnosis techniques such as technetium pyrophosphate imaging. Patients are diagnosed more easily today and due to better disease awareness, thanks to tafamidis, patients are also being diagnosed more earlier in their disease because of better disease awareness. This shifting landscape fits very nicely into the design of our study. As you mentioned, it's a very large study. It's the largest study ever conducted with 1,400 patients expected to complete enrollment very soon in our CARDIO-TTRansform study. And very importantly, we will have a very good balanced -- relatively even balance of patients that are not on stabilizer as well as patients on stabilizer. What that means is that our CARDIO-TTRansform study is positioned to provide the richest data set in this rapidly evolving patient population data which we'll be able to have -- we're going to have strong results in patients that are naive to stabilizer as well as eplontersen on top of stabilizers. In addition, the size of our study will allow us to -- is allowing us to add a large percentage of patients that have hereditary TTR cardiomyopathy. So we're going to have the, we think, richest data set in that subpopulation as well. Furthermore, we have several profile-enhancing studies in progress, imaging studies that will further add the evidence, we think, for eplontersen to provide data that patients, physicians and payers are going to be seeking and selecting what is the best drug for patients with TTR cardiomyopathy and all of that is playing out very well. This is really, Yaron, a landmark study in TTR cardiomyopathy. And we believe the size of the study as well as the dynamics of the patient population is really going to be a very key differentiator for this program and has gone to provide data, which all stakeholders are going to be looking for in this very large and competitive market. In addition, we're very excited by the fact that we have a very convenient approach for patients to administer this drug. Eplontersen for both indications, neuropathy as well as cardiomyopathy, is formulated as a simple auto-injector in which patients can administer the drug themselves at home using a subcutaneous low-volume injection. And based on all the market research we've done over the last several years, along with our partner, AstraZeneca, we're confident that this represents a very significant advantage from a differentiation standpoint as upon -- at the time eplontersen reaches the market. So we're very well positioned in this landscape -- for this rapidly evolving landscape and this very large market opportunity and the eplontersen program continues to perform very well.
Yaron Werber
analystSo a couple of quick questions. In CARDIO-TTRansform, can you just remind us what percentage of patients do you think are going to be on stabilizers concomitantly? And is it fixed and stratified?
Brett Monia
executiveSure. It is not fixed, but we have the ability to pull various levers to settle on to finish the study with the balance of naive patients and patients on stabilizers that we want to have, which is about equal. We expect to finish the study with about equal amounts of patients on stabilizer versus patients not on stabilizer. And yes, it is stratified for this outcome so that we can look at subpopulations of patients either on stabilizer with eplontersen or not on stabilizer.
Yaron Werber
analystAnd are you targeting a certain percent having hereditary cardiomyopathy?
Brett Monia
executiveNot a specific percent. We're trying to get as many patients into the study with hereditary TTR cardiomyopathies as we can. As you know, Yaron, these patients progress very rapidly in the unmet need there compared to wild type and the unmet need for these patients is even greater than wild type. And we want to have, again, a very rich data set that we can speak to for this population as well. So we don't have a specific percentage, but we're very pleased with the enrollment we're getting in our study with the hereditary population.
Yaron Werber
analystOkay. And is it stratified also across [ two arms ] ?
Brett Monia
executiveIt is not stratified for hereditary versus wild type.
Yaron Werber
analystOkay. Okay. So I'm getting a few questions from the audience. What percentage of the market do you think ultimately you can capture or ASOs can capture, ASOs or RNAi's between PN and CM?
Brett Monia
executiveSo we have a great drug in eplontersen. We believe that the efficacy is very competitive, as I mentioned earlier, the week 85 data builds on our confidence that eplontersen is going to be a formidable competitor in both the neuropathy space. And we think that that's going to translate, that data builds on our confidence for cardiomyopathy. I mean these disease indications are essentially caused by the same mechanism, TTR amyloid buildup in either the peripheral nerves or in the cardiac tissue, the cardiomyocytes. So our confidence is building. The efficacy looks great. The safety looks great for this drug, and we have the convenience of a self-administered auto injector, which is another differentiator and the comprehensive nature of our Phase III cardiomyopathy trial, we also think is a very substantial advantage as it will provide the richest data set and ensure for the greatest success in this cardiovascular -- in our cardiovascular outcome trial. So we believe we're going to be a formidable competitor. We're going to do very well in the market, and we're looking forward to launching eplontersen in neuropathy indication soon after approval. And the cardiomyopathy trial is going very well. And as I mentioned earlier, we're -- completion of enrollment in this landmark study is imminent and we're on track for the data readout in 2025. So all things are on track.
Yaron Werber
analystOkay. Terrific. There was another question. I think it's interlinked and I think you've mentioned it already, but I'll ask it anyway. Any advantages of ASOs over RNAi's or small molecule stabilizers in the CARDIO-TTR space?
Brett Monia
executiveWell, we strongly believe that the silencer RNA targeting class of molecules will provide greater efficacy versus stabilizers. We think that we -- there's strong evidence for that in the neuropathy indication already. The efficacy we're seeing with RNA silencers has not been demonstrated with stabilizers today. The efficacy is robust and we think that, that will translate to the cardiomyopathy disease indication as well because, as I mentioned before, the mechanisms of both indications, the disease indicate mechanisms are very similar TTR buildup in cells that cause cellular destruction. There are more similarities than differences between an RNAi mechanism of action versus an ASO mechanism of action. They both target RNA and they're both very similar. We think that we differentiate the ASO class for this indication based on everything I said earlier, the comprehensive nature of our Phase III trial that's going to provide the richest data set in this dynamic and evolving patient population, along with the convenience of a self-administered at-home auto-injector that patients can have that freedom, the independence to inject themselves when they choose to, where they choose to, which is a big differentiator. And you can't count out the advantages that we have in our co-commercialization partnership with AstraZeneca, which is a global powerhouse in the commercialization of all kinds of drugs, especially in the cardiovascular space. So we think that not only do we have a great drug, but that we will be very competitive globally for both indications and in some markets, some indications we expect to be first to market in geographies outside of the U.S. So everything is sitting on old track. We're firing in all cylinders in the eplontersen program, and we think we're going to be very competitive.
Yaron Werber
analystOkay. Terrific. So in the next 9 minutes, I hope that we will cover HAE, and I'm probably going to limit it to 1 question in HAE, Angelman and then FB-LRx for GA. With donidalorsen, the Phase II was -- really looked great. It's a monthly opportunity. The data, I think, is among the -- certainly the best in class, and we're looking forward to the Phase III data first half of next year, I believe. In which -- assuming the Phase III continues to look like the Phase II, among some of the best 96%, 99% reduction in attacks, very good disease control, monthly profile of injections, how do you see it ultimately fitting in? Which patient populations do you think you're really going to compete against just given the data from Takhzyro and also from CSL's Phase III program?
Brett Monia
executiveYes. We're expecting donidalorsen to be our second independent commercial launch for Ionis, as I mentioned earlier, right behind olezarsen for FCS and then following FCS would be sHTG for olezarsen. Donidalorsen is a great-looking drug. As you mentioned, we demonstrated in Phase II very strong efficacy, really a level of efficacy that has not been observed before by any of the drugs on the market today as a prophylactic or drugs in development today with 95% reduction in HAE attacks with nearly 99% of those patients being attack-free during -- through the course of the study. Our confidence is even greater today based on new data we announced this year. We announced 1-year open-label extension data from the Phase II study, which showed that 70 -- that nearly 95% of those patients continue -- we basically replicated long-term treatment up to a year, the 95% reduction in HAE attacks that we saw in the Phase II study, giving us great confidence. Now we're seeing that in 2-year open-label extension data as well, which we will present in the second half of this year at a medical meeting. In the open-label extension, we also looked by every 2-month dosing, and we demonstrated 75% of the patients in the long-term open-label extension with every 2 months' dosing were attack-free, indicating, suggesting that it went down [indiscernible] as we expect, will reach this to market. We have the potential to offer patients flexibility of dosing either monthly or every 2-month dosing based on their preferences. This is a big advantage and a big differentiator both on efficacy and dosing flexibility. And again, the convenience of a simple auto-injector patients can administer by themselves at home conveniently. Also with the long-term treatment, we saw excellent safety and tolerability. So we think that the Phase II data will translate to the Phase III results based on the long-term data. And we think that based on efficacy, I mean, donidalorsen really checks all the boxes that patients and physicians are looking for, for better prophylactic treatments. That is better efficacy. The convenience of an at-home, self-administered well-tolerated injectable either monthly or every 2 months and also with excellent safety and tolerability. This is a switch market, Yaron. This is in the U.S. And so we're looking to our strategy, will be to get patients to try donidalorsen. And then once they do, they'll stick with it because of all the advantages I just mentioned. And in fact, we have a switch study in progress which is going very well. Parallel to our Phase III study, we have a switch study, which patients on prophylactic treatment are being switched over to donidalorsen and I'm very pleased with the enrollment in that study, which shows that patients are willing to go for this and try it. And I'm very pleased with the -- with how patients are staying on treatment with donidalorsen as well because they're getting the benefits of the drug. So that's the strategy going to the U.S. market. It's a very attractive market for Ionis and we're looking forward to the Phase III results early next year. The study has now completed enrollment, and we're preparing for the launch.
Yaron Werber
analystRight. But on Angelman syndrome, I believe data from the Phase I/II study with Biogen is expected in early, I'm thinking, early maybe first half '24. Is that sort of the right time line? Are you still looking at 50 patients across all age groups. This is obviously a signal and a dose-finding study. So what do you expect from the data? And what is it going to take to move into sort of the next -- whether it's a Phase II or pivotal?
Brett Monia
executiveOur Angelman's program is going very well. We continue to enroll patients in a dose escalation Phase I/II study that we're operationalizing. This is partnered with Biogen, but we're running the study. And we're expecting the study to complete relatively soon. We like our chemistry, our chemical platform is the same as QALSODY, it is very similar to SPINRAZA. We like the tolerability profile. We like the convenience of quarterly dosing, intrathecal dosing for these patients. This is a very severe unmet -- there's a very severe unmet medical need for this neurodevelopmental disorder. Our drug targeting UBE3A is performing very well. And we think if positive, it will -- the next step would be a Phase III development. So a pivotal study for the program. We haven't put specific time lines on when we expect data. But I think in the 2024 range, certainly next year, that's a reasonable time frame to think about for that data to read out and then next steps to be laid out for this program.
Yaron Werber
analystTerrific. And then in the last few minutes or so, let's talk about the Phase II GOLDEN study, which is, in many ways, overlooked for geographic atrophy with Roche. I believe data is expected sort of again on the earlier side, maybe first half '24, please correct me kind of where it is, where they're tracking toward that or a slightly different kind of data next year. And ultimately, what's the bar for success here in GA, just given what we've seen so far on the complement side?
Brett Monia
executiveYes. Well, today, there's 1 drug now approved for geographic atrophy. It targets complement C3. It's administered intravitreally, once or every 2 months. And that really has set the bar and the magnitude of slowing down of GA progression that is expected for a drug to be approved and reach to market. The unmet need here remains very, very large, a very small -- really a relatively small percentage of patients actually really benefited from the C3 inhibitor that's now approved and these patients continued -- their GA continued to progress. Furthermore, there's a significant disease burden on these patients with an intravitreal administration every month or two. Our Factor B drug targets Factor B, the alternative of complement pathway, which is hyperactivated in geographic atrophy. We have shown in Phase I development, substantial reductions of Factor B in patients with excellent safety and tolerability. The Phase II GOLDEN study is a large study with over 300 patients looking at different dose levels in that study. It's now fully enrolled. And we think that this is the right target and we have the right drug for this disease indication because, again, the strong evidence that the alternative pathway is a causal pathway in the development of geographic atrophy. We haven't been as precise as you were, Yaron, but we do expect data in 2024 from the GOLDEN study.
Yaron Werber
analystAnd at that point, is the natural, assuming positive data, is Phase III sort of the natural pathway? Or how are you thinking about development?
Brett Monia
executiveThe natural pathway is Phase III development. The Phase II study is large and long and it is positioned to select the dose, to demonstrate proof of concept and to set us up for initiation of a Phase III study, assuming a positive Phase II. And I just want to remind you, Yaron, as you know well, the same drug is also in Phase III development for another indication, a rare indication, IgA nephropathy based on very strong Phase I/II data that we generated and that study is also progressing well. So Factor B isn't overlooked mid-stage pipeline drug. You're right. It's going very well in GA and it's also going very well in Phase III for IgA nephropathy.
Yaron Werber
analystAnd can you just remind us -- and the last question, with more than 300 patients, there are different dose levels in the Phase II GOLDEN study. Is it powered to show it has had significant impact on the primary endpoint? If you can just remind what is the primary endpoint and in which week?
Brett Monia
executiveThe primary endpoint is safety and tolerability as a Phase II study. And also to demonstrate the reductions in Factor B that we want to achieve in this study. We expect to have strong trends in slowing of GA progression in each dose group, at least that's the expectation that will allow us to have the confidence, Roche to have the confidence to move into Phase III development.
Yaron Werber
analystAnd the slowing of GA progression is at 48 weeks?
Brett Monia
executiveIt's at 52 weeks.
Yaron Werber
analystAt 52 weeks. Great. Terrific. Brett, always good to see you. Thank you so much for joining us. We appreciate it.
Brett Monia
executiveThank you, Yaron. It's always a pleasure. Take care.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. transcript — plus 252,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. earnings transcripts and 252,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.