Johnson Controls International plc (JCI) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

February 13, 2020

New York Stock Exchange US Industrials Building Products conference_presentation 42 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#1

Good morning. Thank you for your attention here. We're very pleased to have with us Johnson Controls, JCI, represented by Chairman and CEO, George Oliver; and Vice Chairman and CFO; Brian Stief. We also have Antonella Franzen and then Ryan Edelman as well here. My name is Gautam Khanna. I'm the research analyst at Cowen, who has covered JCI and before that, Tyco, for a number of years. And it's going to be a fireside chat format. First, I wanted to turn it over to George and Brian for some opening remarks, then we'll get to the Q&A.

George Oliver

executive
#2

First, I'd like to thank you, Gautam, for having us at the conference. It's always good to be here with you and the team. And what I'd say is we're coming off of 2 very good years of performance. And when we had our earnings call a couple of weeks ago, we're off to a good start in 2020. So I think it's probably appropriate we get into the fireside chat.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#3

Sure. I appreciate that. Well, George, maybe at a high level, could you take us around the world and give us a sense for the demand environment, what you're seeing, what's changing?

George Oliver

executive
#4

Yes. So let me start with North America. North America continues to expand, maybe at a little bit of a slower rate, but we're still seeing good activity across the verticals that we support. We do have -- when you look at our backlogs, it's still up mid-single digits on a go-forward basis. When you go to -- if you go to EMEA, we've had really good performance there over the last couple of years in how we've positioned the business and how we're gaining share and outperforming in spite of the economic conditions. We've delivered very nice growth. In the first quarter, we're 6%, 7%. And then as we project the year, we're still going to be kind of low to mid-single digits for the rest of the year, and that's continuing as planned. And I had the opportunity to spend a week in Latin America last week. And in spite of the economic conditions there, we've also seen very strong performance. And a lot of that is, I think, capitalizing on the capabilities that we bring to that market, the value propositions that we make to our customers. And we've seen nice double-digit growth there, and that performance will continue. And when you go to Asia, we've had solid performance there. It's a little bit mixed. But overall, good performance in the first quarter. Certainly, the situation with the coronavirus we're watching is very fluid. We're watching that daily and making sure that we're positioned to continue to minimize any impact that we see from that. But overall, we're -- like I said, we started the year with continuing to maintain our backlog of about 6%. We're projecting that we're going to continue to convert orders kind of low to mid-single digits, and that has positioned us to be able to deliver again a very, very strong performance in 2020.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#5

Can you expand a little bit about what's going on in EMEA? Your company-specific initiatives, you started a couple of years ago. And what specifically has changed and why it's actually gaining commercial traction?

George Oliver

executive
#6

In EMEA/LA?

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#7

In -- yes, EMEA/LA, yes.

George Oliver

executive
#8

So EMEA/LA is -- when we started the -- when you go back to the integration of those businesses, those businesses didn't have -- a lot of the businesses didn't have scale. The fundamentals were strained. And so what the team has done there extremely well is to put the businesses together during the integration, streamline the businesses so that from a go-to-market standpoint, in every market, we have a good understanding of the market that we serve, how do we segment our sales team to be successful and how we grow in each of the markets; and then from an efficiency standpoint, get tremendous leverage off of the footprint that we have. And they've done an extremely good job in doing that. And then not only expanding our installed base would the -- kind of the over market performance with how we're executing on our installation business, but from a service standpoint, making sure that with that installed base, we're getting our fair share or more of the service growth and the recurring revenue. And they've done a nice job there. So I mean I'm very pleased with the work that's been done over the last 2 or 3 years. And I believe the fundamentals are in place so that we can continue to improve the fundamentals while we're continuing to reinvest and ultimately outperforming the market.

Brian Stief

executive
#9

Can you guys -- I would just say, I think if you look at Europe, dial back a couple of years ago as part of the integration and some of the restructuring that was done in Europe, Jeff Williams did a really nice job when he was the leader of the European business to take a real hard look at the cost structure post JCI-Tyco integration there. And I think the benefits of that, we've seen really come through the last 12 months. I mean we're -- 200 basis points improvement, I think, is pretty solid.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#10

And speaking of the -- increasing the service tail, if you will, can you talk a little bit about attach rates now versus 2, 3 years ago before the integration really began?

George Oliver

executive
#11

Yes. I would say, from a strategy -- this has been a key element of the strategy over the last 2 years that as we put resources into how we develop the installed base and differentiate that installed base, that we're making sure that from a go-to-market standpoint, we're capitalizing on that to be able to get the recurring revenue, whether it be through an attach contract or through L&M, depending on how our customer works. And so I'd say it varies, but across the globe, we're seeing improved performance. When you look at our service growth from where we were really 3 years ago, it was relatively flat, low single digits. And on average, we've achieved over 2 consecutive years 4% or 5%. And the idea here is not only do we continue that with the expansion of our footprint with the traditional service, but the opportunity that we have going forward is how we're now taking our digital technologies not only to enhance the service that historically we have performed and being able to make it much more predictive, do some of it remotely, but then to be able to build on that base because with our installed systems today, we can extract a lot of data from multiple systems. And then with that data, we can create incredible outcomes above and beyond historically what we've done. And the big focus right now is around energy. HVAC is one of the most significant users of energy within a building or infrastructure. And when we not only bring our leadership product, but then from a connectivity standpoint, within the building, we utilize all of the data across the building not just relative to the equipment. You can optimize that such that we can reduce energy, 20%, 30%, 40%. And so there's a lot of value to be created now with not only the equipment that we deploy but also the systems that we can leverage, and that ultimately then creates service in how we ultimately better support the customer base that we serve.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#12

Speaking of that, we often hear Trane technology -- Ingersoll Rand talk about this type of performance contracting, incentive contracting, where they will guarantee some level of energy savings, anything above that. Maybe they'll get -- they'll share in the upside that the customer saves. Are you guys -- is that part of the business model? And where is that?

Brian Stief

executive
#13

Yes. So just to size that for you, Gautam, it's about a $600 million business at Johnson Controls. And essentially, what that performance contract business does is we'll go into a large building or set of commercial buildings, and we'll do engineering studies to determine what type of savings we think we could generate in that set of commercial buildings on a go-forward basis. So these contract terms can be as long as 20 or 30 years. What we do is we go in and commit to a level of guaranteed savings, such that the cash flows of the savings from a customer perspective essentially provide really the cover to their financing cost plus some incremental savings on a stand-alone basis for the customer. And so from a risk standpoint at JCI, you'd say, "Okay. Well, you're guaranteeing these savings contracts for a multiyear period." Our experience with those has been extremely favorable. I mean our guaranteed savings shortfall in any contract has been really de minimis for the period of time that we've been in this. So because of the size of some of these contracts, it can be a bit choppy as far as orders secured in a particular quarter and the flow rates of some of those contracts. But all in all, it's about a $600 million business, and I wouldn't expect huge growth one way or the other on a go-forward basis in that.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#14

Because it's fairly mature as it stands right now.

Brian Stief

executive
#15

Yes.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#16

Going back to EMEA/LA just for a second. You did call out, I think, the Middle East being a little bit softer. And that was about 10% of the segment, if I recall. What specifically is going on there? And when do you see that starting to abate?

George Oliver

executive
#17

Yes, that market has been -- obviously, it was an incredible growth market for us up until a couple of years ago. And then with the compares we had, we had tough from a compares standpoint last year in 2018, and then that continued. On a run rate basis, we're actually back, I think, slightly positive year-on-year now. And so the team has done -- I was over there latter part of last year. We've done a tremendous job making sure that we're not only positioned with the right technology and product but also from a footprint standpoint, that we're best positioned to be able to support the infrastructure there. So I believe that with some of the recovery and the like that we're well positioned. We're building services as a percent of our revenue. Service continues to expand with the installed base that we have there. So I think it's just making sure that from an economic standpoint, we understand what the impact is and that we're always focused on how do we create more value for our customers that through the economic cycle positions us to be able to have a better service footprint.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#18

And at a high level, talking about service growing in the mid-single-digit range, is that sort of the long-term average that you would expect up and through the cycles? Or how should we think about how service is relative to the product business and the install business?

George Oliver

executive
#19

Yes. When you look at our core businesses and each of the domains, whether it be HVAC, Fire, Security and then when you build an installed base what is that revenue stream over the life cycle? It's been relatively low growth, the traditional. It's been kind of in line with the overall GDP-type growth. As we now have put services front and center to what we're going to -- how we're going to take the company forward, there's tremendous opportunity to expand what we currently do. And a lot of that is not only expanding our footprint and making sure that from a customer standpoint, we're best positioned to serve existing customers. But as I said earlier with our digital capabilities, there's tremendous value propositions that we can add to our current services that we believe opens up a whole new market. And that is in line with what's happening just more broadly with digitalization of buildings and infrastructure. And with our position in buildings, with all of our multiple digital assets as they're defined today, we're -- what we're doing is we're bringing all of those assets together into a simpler architecture that when we build our data layer, that utilizing multiple streams of data, applying artificial intelligence or machine learning, that we can create incredible outcomes beyond what historically we've done to serve our customers. So with that new market growth on top of our traditional growth, we believe that we can sustain kind of a mid-single-digit-plus growth on a go-forward basis. But there is -- with this disruption that's happening, we believe that the combination of our technology and products and our installed base, combined with the technology that we deploy that enhances our services, we have a tremendous opportunity to capitalize on the trends that are happening within buildings.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#20

So is it fair to assume then that -- also that service as it matures is going to be much higher contribution margin than traditional service has been because it is digitally enabled? What -- and you can charge for the value and...

George Oliver

executive
#21

Yes. I mean what I would say is that a company that is -- with the reinvestments we're making, we want to make sure that with the value propositions that we create to serve our customers, that we're getting the appropriate returns on those value propositions. So with the digital capabilities, there's much higher value. And so you would expect that with that that you'd be able to maintain and grow margins as a result of that new business, I don't know, within the digital space.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#22

That makes sense. One thing that I -- it's been nearly 4 years since the merger. And I'm just curious, where are you in the integration? You talked about the initiatives in EMEA/LA. We know about what's happened in North America. But is the branch consolidation all done? I mean where are we in that journey? What's still left to be done?

George Oliver

executive
#23

So what I would say is when you take 2 large, very complex companies across multiple domains and we put them together because we believe that longer term, the combined capabilities was what was truly going to differentiate Johnson Controls to lead Buildings, all of that has been true. Now when you do that, it is very complex. We have a very complex footprint. And bringing it all together, we've made tremendous progress in the first 3-plus years here. And so the idea going forward is with that foundation, with the strategy to ultimately be positioned to grow and get leverage with the growth, that there's still tremendous opportunity to continue to drive productivity through the system that enables us that as we continue to grow, we can continue to deliver productivity, continue to reinvest and still be able to see nice improvement in margins on a go-forward basis.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#24

Sure. But in terms of like the branch -- you guys actually had laid out several buckets of cost savings. Are we mostly -- is that basically behind us? Or where are we? I know it's a continuous...

Brian Stief

executive
#25

Yes. It is. I would just say, to frame it from a financial standpoint, as I think you know, we had committed to ex Power Solutions about $900 million of productivity and synergy save. And the remainder of that save will be delivered in 2020. So it was a 4-year program, '17 through '20. We've got $150 million that we'll deliver this year, and that will really be, I would say, the end of the original view as to what type of effort was required to integrate the businesses. We were -- you'd kind of say, why $150 million in the fourth year? Why did it take so long? You might remember that as part of the JCI-Tyco merger, we were restricted for a period of time in merging all of the operations because we had some debt outstanding. And we talked to -- about it as the TSarl debt, which required us to operate the 2 businesses as almost stand-alone companies to some extent for a period of time, and a lot of that had to do with our ability to integrate branches and certain of the operations. That was alleviated in third quarter of last year when we paid off the TSarl debt. And so we now are finishing up all the branch integration and move to shared service centers. And a lot of that activity is what's happening in fiscal '20. So I think as you move forward into 2021, we're no longer going to have the integration costs. We'll leverage, as George said, the base that we've established through the combined companies.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#26

Interesting. That's actually very helpful context. So -- but we will have achieved $900 million of savings by the end of this fiscal year?

Brian Stief

executive
#27

Sure.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#28

Okay. One of the things we talked about at the onset of the merger was the potential for revenue synergies, which I know at the time was just hypothetical. But can you speak to whether any of that actually manifested? And if so where?

George Oliver

executive
#29

And so when you looked at -- when we did the merger, we're relatively low -- very low growth. And very quickly as we got through that first year and I ultimately succeeded Alex, we took a step back and said, "Are we really positioned now from a sales capacity productivity, market-backed structure that enables us to be able to now leverage all of our combined capabilities to be able to deliver on outperformance of the markets we serve?" And so we did a tremendous amount of work. And if you look at the last 2 years with what -- how we built out our capacity, now how we're getting leverage with that capacity to be able to accelerate the growth. Recognizing that, when you look at our domains, HVAC or Fire & Security, we're still positioned to be able to serve customers the way that they were served. So it isn't just -- it isn't bundling per se. But it's leveraging our regional presence with the customer base that we serve, whether it be in HVAC, Fire & Security. And then as they evolve going forward, that we're much better positioned now to take the expanded capability and really help them transform their business and ultimately deliver a lot of value. So when you look at our growth rates that we've achieved over the last 2 years, we've delivered on that and then some, I believe, based on how we've put the structure together, how we've segmented the market, how we've established our sales force and then now how we've executed on not only building pipelines but converting pipelines to orders and ultimately to revenue. We are definitely getting the leverage out of that expanded capability.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#30

Meaning, you're introducing HVAC products to your legacy Fire & Security customers and vice versa?

George Oliver

executive
#31

So today, we still -- it's -- you're obviously influenced by how the customer buys, whether it be HVAC, Fire & Security. But you can imagine, especially with when you look at our portfolio of BMS, Building Management Systems, we have a strong position in building controls, which tends to be the foundation of the digital assets within a building. And then we have electronic fire, electronic security, and that breaks out into 3 or 4 domains. And so the idea is not only do we continue to operate as we do within the domains. But more important now, from a customer standpoint, we have this incredible opportunity to bring all of that together and create a whole new value proposition going forward. So not only are we getting the leverage across the domains with the regional footprint, but now being able to really transform customers with the combined capability.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#32

Which brings me to a remark you made on the earnings call, which was at the front log of the pipeline of opportunities is still continuing to grow. I think you said at one point mid- to high single digits on the call, and maybe correct me if I'm wrong. But is that kind of what we're seeing? And maybe if you could break that out or give us some color on that regionally, how that pipeline is tracking and where it's juicier then?

George Oliver

executive
#33

Yes. I mean when you look at this, I mean we now have an operating system across our sales structure that we're tracking pipeline, cycles of conversion, conversion, probability and then ultimately to revenue. And so over the last 2 years, as we've expanded our footprint and repositioned a lot of our resources in line where we strategically want to grow, our pipelines have continuously been expanding kind of mid-single digit, mid- to upper single digits depending on the region and the activity. For the most part, that's true across the board. Because it's not only the market that's driving that, but it's also how we're repositioning our resources to capitalize on the key markets. So as I said on the call, our backlog is up 6%. So that's still -- that positions us to be able to deliver on the low to mid-single-digit revenue growth that we've committed for the year. And that we believe, from a pipeline standpoint, being up kind of mid- to upper single digits, and again that varies across the regions, that we are positioned to be able to deliver a similar-type order growth through the course of the year.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#34

Can you speak -- we haven't talked about North America, let's get to that. So what specifically are you seeing in the North American markets? Maybe start with applied and talk about the resi and the unitary business as well.

George Oliver

executive
#35

Yes. So when you look at pretty much across the board, we continue to expand. And when you look at HVAC, we've had very strong performance here over the last couple of years with applied in how we've converted not only orders but to revenue. That expansion continues obviously at a lower rate, I mean because we've -- obviously, the market is still expanding but I think slightly reduced. That's continuing. Fire & Security globally, if you look at the global number, last quarter or the first quarter, we had mid-single-digit growth both globally across products as well as across all of the regions, and it was broad-based. I mean there's no one region that was driving that. So I think overall, on North America, we're positioned with an incredible position. We've got good pipelines. We're focused on converting the pipeline. Positioned extremely well.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#36

What about on the resi side?

George Oliver

executive
#37

On the resi, when you look at...

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#38

Or unitary products group.

George Oliver

executive
#39

Yes. So if you go into global products, and that's where we've had some softness, it really breaks out into North America with our UPG business. And then our unducted business, our Hitachi JV in Asia, and it's mainly driven by the Japanese market, and it's really been the market. And we've got a very high position, high market position there, and we're maintaining our position. North America for us was that I think last year's cycle was very unusual, the whole -- the way that the season played out and the temperature and the like, and that created some anomalies during the course of the year. And so then at the same time that as we're looking to position the business more efficiently so that we're positioned to accelerate growth and gain share, we've done some restructuring of our distribution. Some of that was in Canada, which, I think, created some disruption on the quarter. And then based on that, I think when you normalize all that, we're still probably down low to mid-single digits. But it's a business that we've invested extremely well into new products. We've got a lot of new products in the market. We're making sure that we're tracking each one of the investments and making sure not only with the product but also with the distribution, we're positioned to perform. So that's where we are in North America. And then in -- with the residential, which is the other big piece in Asia, we've performed extremely well with our Hitachi JV over the last 3 or 4 years. Certainly, the market condition there, that's been challenging in Japan. But we're continuing to launch products as planned and on time. And I think we'll -- over the cycle, we'll be well positioned to be able to continue to perform.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#40

Can you speak to -- you talked about, I think, 30% incrementals. You've been delivering that the last couple of years. But 30% incremental margins, and sort of where do we think in aggregate the portfolio can get in terms of EBITDA margin? Right now, you're approaching 14% for this year. Kind of where do we see that if the incrementals are 30%?

George Oliver

executive
#41

I mean we've -- when you look at the work that's been done, we've done incredible work. You don't always see the work, all the transformation that's occurred with the integration and how we've built the fundamentals. And within that, not only business fundamentals, but organizationally, making sure that we've got the right structure, we've got the right leadership in that we're going to be positioned to be able to sustain our performance going forward well beyond the integration. That's what we've been focused on. And so as you look at the incrementals, even through the integration period that we've been able to get products from kind of low to mid-20s to high 20s, 30-plus percent, and then our Field-based businesses were kind of teens to low 20s and heading toward mid-20s. So when you look at the overall aggregate of our mix of how we go to market, we're now pushing plus or minus 30% incrementals. And I believe that with our fundamentals, with our structure and how we go to market, that we can sustain that so that we can continue to get the productivity, maintain our reinvestment. And then with the volume, we ultimately get the leverage to be able to maintain those type of incrementals.

Brian Stief

executive
#42

And I think looking at that 14% that you referred to as well, I mean there's certainly upside to that as we continue to lever at 30 -- around that 30% number. I mean that should be mid-teens plus, right?

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#43

Absolutely, yes.

George Oliver

executive
#44

I mean supporting all of that, you really do have to look at mix because a big focus on maintaining our product leadership, which is higher mix. And then with the service strategy that we're deploying and not only maintaining but growing our services and making it more recurring, I think, does enable us to be able to begin to expand margins as it relates to mix. And so I have confidence that our -- our goal was to not just derive synergies combined with productivity in the first 3 or 4 years. The job was to set up a structure that is sustainable to be able to deliver continued productivity while you're being agile in how we're supporting customers, delivering on growth and being positioned to deliver expanded margins. And we're still focused on do we -- we're going to continue to expand to get to mid-teens margins.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#45

That's a good point. At the onset of the merger, you laid out these plans. You're very close to having concluded most of those plans. I understand it's an evolution. But -- so what are the major kind of next steps? You've talked a little bit about how restructuring costs come down quite a bit in fiscal '21. What are the next big initiatives? Or can you give us a window into maybe what the next 3 or 4 years look like.

George Oliver

executive
#46

I believe that as much as we've had significant transformation to date kind of inside out with the integration, there's a major trend underway from a digitalization standpoint, a transformation happening, customer back. And so the big trend for us is the ability to be able to be agile with our software development to build, to leverage and deploy technology that will fundamentally change the value proposition that we deliver for our customers. And we're on track to do that. We brought in Mike Ellis, who is our Chief Customer and Digital Officer. So from a customer perspective, seeing the trends and understanding their strategies that we then convert into how do we very easily position ourselves to deploy digital capabilities, that truly is going to create a much higher value proposition. So that's a big focus for us because we believe that with the combination of our product and technology with our channel, we're extremely well positioned to be able to capitalize on those trends in the market. And then with those trends, there's a big deliverable around sustainability. And that when you look at what we do within, whether it be building or infrastructure, there's a tremendous opportunity to be able to reduce energy consumption, drive better utilization of space. And there's a lot of attributes with the data that we can utilize to improve upon. And so that's going to be, for us, a big focus of how we make sure that we're positioned to win with our customers and in leveraging the combined capabilities that we are positioned to bring to them.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#47

And how does that inform the M&A strategy? Is that an area where there are R&D by another name type of tuck-in candidates or bigger companies to look at? Or...

George Oliver

executive
#48

I mean I'll say from M&A, I mean we've been, as we've laid out over the last few years, very much focused on. We have incredible portfolio. It's a tremendous opportunity to improve the fundamentals, to be able to get to growth that's above market and get to fundamentals that can leverage in a much bigger way. And that's the journey we're on. And there's still plenty of opportunity to continue to improve, and that's been the focus. In parallel to that, you always are looking at the landscape. And as we're making the reinvestments, whether it be a particular product or a technology, you're always looking at what are the alternatives from an M&A standpoint? Are there bolt-ons or are there -- is there innovation that if we were able to incorporate it into our solution set would be a differentiator for the customers we serve? So that is constant. We're looking at how do we expand our service footprint, and so we've made some small acquisitions that give us the opportunity that in markets we didn't have a presence but we have a significant customer base, how do we better position our capabilities to support them. So it's all of the above, and we're always balancing what the M&A opportunity, bolt-ons are to -- in the current environment to what we're doing organically. And that's really been the focus.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#49

And so I mean this raises the question we often get, which is, when we think about the York North American resi business, it's much smaller than that of your competitors. Is that an area where you need to get scale quickly? Or how do you think about capital allocation for M&A and bolstering parts of the portfolio besides digital technology?

George Oliver

executive
#50

The strategy that we've been executing is that the residential piece is an important part of the overall line card that we produce and ultimately provide to our distribution to be able to be successful to support their customers. And that continues. And we've made a lot of progress with the reinvestment in product, the different product offerings and then the expansion of our distribution to be able to continue to gain market share within that space. And that's the strategy that we've been deploying, and I believe it is an important element of the overall offering. Certainly, from a margin structure standpoint, we need to make sure that we're reinvesting and getting returns on those reinvestments, but we're positioned to continue down that path.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#51

Organically?

George Oliver

executive
#52

Organically.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#53

So I was going to ask, is there -- I mean are these common facilities where the resi York stuff is manufactured relative to the -- some of the unitary product or the applied product? Or are these completely dissimilar supply chains? Is there anything you can speak to?

George Oliver

executive
#54

Well, I mean when you look at our supply chain, we have a very integrated supply chain and produce all of our...

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#55

And productive...

George Oliver

executive
#56

Yes. All of our materials and components and how do we make sure that we're most efficient, not only in how we buy, but how we make. That being said, the residential product is different than the rooftops and the like. So we have separate facilities that ultimately manufacture the product. But we do leverage our entire supply chain and footprint to be able to be most efficient and, ultimately, not only of our cost of goods, but then from a location standpoint, logistics and distribution that minimizes our cost.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#57

Fair enough. Just moving to the balance sheet quickly. You guys have talked about how -- a little bit about PFAS and your exposure or a lack of exposure there. Can you maybe talk about that more broadly? And then secondly, how that might inform your willingness to lever up? Or what your comfort level is in terms of debt-to-EBITDA or anything of that nature?

George Oliver

executive
#58

Yes. I mean that came up in our earnings call a couple of weeks ago, and our position hasn't changed relative to that. And so Brian maybe can touch upon as far as the balance sheet, but we haven't changed our position relative to our exposure there.

Brian Stief

executive
#59

Yes. I think as it relates to the balance sheet, I mean as you know, we've got a $2.2 billion share repo program that we're doing via the 10b5-1 this year. And we'll continue to move forward with that and complete that. We've got $1 billion remaining from the Power Solutions proceeds that we're kind of holding off to maintain some optionality through the back half of the year, and so we'll ultimately decide what we're going to do with that. And then of course, we're back-ended relative to our cash flow, as you know. And so we'll be generating pretty significant cash flow in the back half of this year, in particular the fourth quarter. So we get to the end of the year, I think our leverage is going to be in the 1.5 range, and we've always talked about being pretty comfortable in the 2 to 2.5. So I don't really view PFAS within the context of inhibiting anything from our balance sheet flexibility standpoint. As George said, we feel pretty comfortable with where we are on that.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#60

And George, I think on the call, you mentioned that with respect to the $1 billion M&A placeholder, it didn't seem as though that's going to get utilized this year. Is that fair? It's not as promising a pipeline to consume the full $1 billion?

George Oliver

executive
#61

Yes. I mean we're all -- I mean at this stage, when you look at our pipeline today, that would be true. And we're continuing to execute, like I said, some of these bolt-ons, whether it be technology or footprint that enhances our services, and that's currently where the activity is. So it's hard to speculate as things go forward, but that's the current status.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#62

Got it. Can you elaborate a little bit on what's going on in the retail vertical and which businesses are actually being affected by it?

George Oliver

executive
#63

And so we -- when you look at our retail business, we have an incredible business. It's high margin. It creates a lot of value for our retailers. When you look at whether it be the -- any [ fed ] solutions or whether it be our inventory solutions and how we enable our retailers to better utilize their working capital or when you look at traffic and how they optimize the overall store performance, so there's tremendous value proposition for businesses, has operated extremely well. Certainly, you got to take into account there's been a lot of restructuring in -- of the retail businesses. And so what we've stayed -- we've stayed focused on how do we make sure that with our expanded portfolio that with the changes that they're embarking on, that we're well positioned to be able to enable that. Short term, that has impacted us. We talked a little bit about the mix because now we're doing more installs versus some of the recurring revenue around the labels and tags that we provide. But I'm confident that the way that we're positioned to support the retailers through the transformations they're going through that we're going to be positioned to continue to execute on that business. But short term, there certainly has been an impact not only -- a little bit on the top line, but some of the mix that we saw.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#64

Right. And could you actually help quantify what that has been? It's about a $900 million business? And what kind of pressure are we talking about here on the top line?

George Oliver

executive
#65

Yes. So on the -- the top line has actually been pretty stable here short term. And then the margins because of the mix has been creating -- it's on the grand scheme of it -- when you look at the overall profitability it's been to North America, it's been about 20 basis points.

Brian Stief

executive
#66

Yes. I mean it's 30 basis points in the first quarter, I think, was the impact that we talked about. I think for the full year, 10 to 20 basis points in that ballpark to start.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#67

And your view is that this -- I mean this -- it's still a core business. Obviously, this is more of a -- what are you doing to kind of shift the mix back up? Or is there anything you really can do? Or is it just restructuring to get the cost down? What sort of a plan of action?

George Oliver

executive
#68

It comes down to when you look at the value proposition of the solution set that we're developing, it's significant in enabling our customers to work through and execute through their transformations or through their restructurings. And so we've been very much focused on -- we had a good presence at the NRF. We had tremendous customer engagement at the NRF here in January. And so it's staying -- making sure that with the capability, not only the existing capabilities, but the new digital solutions that we're providing on top of our installed base is what enhances us to be able to support them through their changes that they're making. So I'm confident that globally, that we're very much focused on how do we not only change the mix of what we do but be positioned to win with the customers that we serve.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#69

Fair enough. I have to ask the question given a lot of deconsolidation among your competitors, how that might change the competitive landscape from where you sit?

George Oliver

executive
#70

I mean without talking specifically about either one of them, I think they've operated within their structures. They've operated as an independent business, I think, stand-alone business. And therefore, it shouldn't significantly change how they're operating or how they go to market. I think in each case, it might be a change, and because now you have to stand up a public company and there's public company costs and the like. But the strategy at the business level doesn't change. Now if there's change in leadership and they want to change their strategy relative to reinvestment or other elements, that's not untypical in how businesses are led and how change is created with new leadership. So I don't fundamentally see a change in how we ultimately compete and how we -- how the industry works.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#71

Got it. Now that's helpful. And I just wanted to finalize this with -- you did talk about orders being up kind of mid-single digit through the year. And that's despite comps getting tougher as we moved through the year: Q2, plus 2; Q3, plus 6. What is sort of the driver of your confidence level? I'm just curious, like what gives you that conviction this early in the year that we're going to see a result like that after Q1?

George Oliver

executive
#72

So the conviction comes from -- like I said, we've put a sales operating system in place. We're tracking every lead, every opportunity. And so therefore -- and then we have predictability of those type of deals, how they convert. We track through the cycle of conversion. And then over time, you have a pretty good assessment of probability of how we're going to ultimately convert that pipeline. So the pipeline is still strong, right? And you don't always convert all of the pipeline. But what we've seen historically, it's similar to what we've seen, focusing on conversion. And then what I do and the senior leaders, I have a rhythm of getting out with customers on a frequent basis through the course of the year. And just over the last 6 months, I've been -- spent time in Continental Europe and the U.K. and the Middle East. I just came back from Latin America, and a big part of that is meeting with our most strategic customers. And I'm confident that with their strategies, with our strategies that we're positioned to be able to create a lot of value. That gives me confidence that the opportunities that we see, we're going to convert on. There is cycle time to some of the conversion. But at the end of the day, that gives me confidence that just my own assessment of how customers are working, what they're demanding, how we're positioned to serve them gives me a lot of confidence that there's a lot more opportunity than I see in how we ultimately support their growth, which then in turn supports our growth.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#73

One last one. I lied about this, that wasn't -- that's the last question. The last one, maybe for Brian. Cash conversion, free cash flow conversion, is there any reason structurally, the business should not convert at 100% or more of net income? You've talked about pension. You've talked about JV -- sorry, equity income -- minority interest that doesn't dividend out. But can you talk about, over time, should this be 100%-plus business.

Brian Stief

executive
#74

Well, that's our long-term target. I mean our medium- to long-term target would be to get to 100%. I would tell you that it's been a journey. We started at 55% in 2017, moved to 88%, moved to 99%. And this year, we're very comfortable with the 95%. You're right. I think pension and joint venture income versus dividends we're receiving out of the joint ventures are probably the 2 primary headwinds we have. The pension one is not going to go away because it's more an accounting matter. The joint venture dividend, matching more up with equity income, is something we can go after and work with our joint venture partners on. And the other thing I would say is we made a lot of improvement in trade working capital as a percentage of sales, 60 basis points this past quarter, over 200 basis points since we started the journey a couple of years ago. And that's probably 80% to 90% of the locations globally that we've gone after. I still think there's some more locations that we can do a better job in trade working capital management. So is there some more juice there that we can add to it? Yes, I think there is. So medium to long term, 100%, but very confident with the 95% this year.

Gautam Khanna

analyst
#75

Thank you very much, gentlemen.

George Oliver

executive
#76

No, thank you, Gautam.

Brian Stief

executive
#77

Thanks.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Johnson Controls International plc transcript — plus 250,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Johnson Controls International plc earnings transcripts and 250,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.