Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

November 12, 2026

NYSE American US Consumer Staples Food Products earnings 40 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Trevor Rousseau

executive
#1

Thanks, and good afternoon everyone. Welcome to the third quarter 2026 earnings conference call and webcast for Laird Superfood. Joining us today are Jason Vieth, Laird Superfood's President and Chief Executive Officer, along with Mark Johnson, our Chief Financial Officer. By this point, everyone should be able to access our earnings release, which was filed today after market close. You can find it in the investor relations section of our website at lairdsuperfood.com. Before we get started, please be aware that management may make forward-looking statements during this call within the context of federal securities laws. Such statements rest on management's current expectations and carry risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described. For a detailed discussion of these risks and uncertainties, please refer to today's press release and other filings with the SEC. With that said, I will hand the call over to Jason.

Jason Vieth

executive
#2

Appreciate that, Trevor, and hello everyone this afternoon. Jason Vieth here — I serve as President and CEO of Laird Superfood — and joining me is Mark Johnson, who holds the Chief Financial Officer role. Mark joined the company on October 1st. Prior to that, his most recent position was Vice President of Finance, North America, at Tropicana Brands Group. His background includes more than 25 years of finance leadership across publicly traded consumer packaged goods firms as well as private equity-backed operations in beverage, food, and premium pet food. Earlier in his career, before Tropicana, Mark worked at Champion Petfoods as Vice President of Commercial and Supply Chain Finance, and there he helped drive meaningful profit and sales growth. Before joining us, Mark held several high-level finance leadership roles at Danone and WhiteWave Foods, and he put in ten years at the Pepsi Bottling Group working in corporate planning and finance positions. We're pleased to have him on board as we continue integrating the platform and remain focused on sustainable, profitable growth. I'm also delighted to introduce Matt Kuusinen, who joins as our new Senior Vice President of Supply Chain. Matt previously served at Horizon Organic as Chief Procurement Officer. Prior to this role, Matt spent close to 20 years at Danone in senior supply chain positions, including VP of Supply Chain for Beverages and VP of Supply Chain for Plant-Based and Premium Dairy, along with earlier leadership roles in sales and operations planning, procurement, plant operations, and continuous improvement. As we continue integrating our brands, driving synergies, and supporting the platform's growth, his extensive experience scaling supply chains in plant-based and premium food and beverage will be a major asset. I've been fortunate to work with Matt and Mark previously, and as they join our management team, I expect a smooth transition. Q3 marked another significant quarter in building out our superfood platform. Net sales climbed 225%, reaching $42 million. The main drivers were a full quarter of contributions from Navitas and Terrasoul, plus ongoing expansion of distribution in the retail channel. Net income came in at $1.7 million, equal to $0.10 per basic and diluted share, and adjusted EBITDA was $2.1 million. Integration work continues to progress. Navitas, as we noted last quarter, is now fully integrated across our processes, organization, and ERP system. Together, Navitas and Laird function as a single team, with shared processes and accountability, and we show up as one unified presence to customers, distributors, and partners. That same disciplined approach is now being applied to Terrasoul. Accounting and finance are the furthest along, and systems and operational integration are now beginning. We're continuing to build out the Laird brand platform, and we've got a number of new launches coming that are meant to serve ongoing consumer appetite for products that are convenient, functional, and high in protein. Among them are a functional instant coffee line, electrolyte coffee powders, and coffee protein bars. Through these innovations we're drawing on our strengths in coffee and superfoods, extending our relevance into more occasions, and supporting growth in retail as well as e-commerce. Beyond that, we're moving forward with a revamped lineup of concepts for Navitas and Terrasoul, giving us solid launch platforms for 2027 throughout the combined business. Synergies from uniting these three business platforms are already showing up early in the results. Adjusted EBITDA reached $2.1 million, which mirrors the contribution of the acquired brands plus the cost and operational synergies we're starting to capture across the supply chain, shared overhead, and marketing. We expect those benefits to keep building, and we anticipate the combined go-to-market structure will continue producing returns by driving sales ahead. Like many peers in food and beverage, we're facing elevated cost headwinds. Fuel and freight expenses have risen substantially, and shoppers remain careful with their spending; we're pushing back against those pressures by taking selective pricing steps in particular channels, managing mix actively, containing costs more tightly, continuing productivity efforts in the supply chain, and keeping trade and promotional spending disciplined. Along with the synergies we're realizing from integration, those actions are assisting us in safeguarding margins as we continue putting money into growth. During our Q2 call, I mentioned that we are intentionally ramping up commercial and marketing spend considerably so that we can strengthen our brands and fuel sales growth. The way consumers behave is changing in directions that align squarely with what we do best, and we intend to take advantage of it. To illustrate, there's an obvious shift from conventional coffee pots toward handy powder-based coffee offerings, and we want to secure a solid share of that market through our powdered instant latte and our other coffee items. Meanwhile, people taking GLP-1 medications are changing how they eat, seeking to get the most nutrition out of every calorie they consume, and our superfood platform—built around clean, functional, high-quality nutrition—is ideally suited to meet that need. For Q4, our marketing outlay is rising by nearly $2 million compared with the same period last year, and we anticipate a similar bump for 2027. Underpinning that outlay are commercial capabilities far more robust than they were just a year ago, and we're laying the foundation for durable expansion down the road. With the platform now at meaningful scale, we've made a strategic choice to direct investment toward brand awareness, velocity, and new distribution. That positions us to seize these shifting occasions and keep growing even as consumers turn more cautious. Commercially, momentum is strong across key areas. Amazon and the rest of the online marketplaces are still powerful engines of growth for our brands. We are tapping into Terrasoul's considerable know-how and demonstrated best practices in marketplace operations, content, advertising, and fulfillment to get Laird and Navitas up and running and scaled on those platforms—speeding up their performance and seizing more of the demand out there. Retail expansion is also moving forward, following the Walmart coffee and creamer launches and the broader Navitas assortment at Target that we mentioned last quarter. Cacao and coffee products continue to post strong results and are adding to the category's momentum. Some organic gains were offset by weakness in direct-to-consumer and club channels, yet overall the platform is growing as planned. Cash at the close of the quarter was $17.3 million, and we carry no debt. This robust unlevered balance sheet supports the integration work now underway along with selective growth investments, and it affords us considerable flexibility as we manage today’s conditions and continue building the platform; during Q4, we will concentrate on carrying out the integration, generating growth in retail, e-commerce, and Amazon, and capturing the platform’s cost and revenue synergies. Thanks to the funding and strategic backing from our Nexus partners, we're in a strong position to continue developing what we think has the potential to be a top-tier, scaled platform in superfoods and positive nutrition. At this point I'll pass things along to Mark, who will walk through the figures in greater detail.

Mark Johnson

executive
#3

Thanks, Jason, and good afternoon to everyone. The third quarter marked our first complete quarter with all three brands operating together. I'll take you through what powered our results for quarter three, and after that I'll spend some time discussing how we're viewing the full year. Net sales came in at $42 million for the third quarter of 2026, which is 225% higher than the $12.9 million recorded in the third quarter of 2025, and 2% above the $41.3 million we posted last quarter. That gain came mainly from the Navitas and Terrasoul acquisitions, along with expanded distribution in our retail channel. E-commerce stood as our biggest channel during this quarter, climbing more than 3.5x year-over-year to $22.5 million and accounting for 54% of total net sales. This growth was led by adding Navitas and Terrasoul plus robust performance on amazon.com. Wholesale rose nearly 3x year-over-year to $19.4 million and represented 46% of total net sales, propelled by the addition of Navitas and Terrasoul; across the first nine months of the year, net sales reached $97.2 million, an increase of 166% versus $36.5 million in the prior year period, with wholesale accounting for 51% of total net sales and e-commerce accounting for 49%. Gross profit for the third quarter totaled $12.4 million, or 29.6% of net sales, versus $4.7 million, or 36.5% of net sales, in the prior year period, a contraction of roughly 7 percentage points. This margin compression stemmed mainly from inflationary commodity costs and the lower margins tied to the Terrasoul brand and its business model with lighter brand investment. On a year to date basis, gross profit was $29.6 million, or 30.4% of net sales, versus $14.4 million and 39.3% of net sales in the prior year period, driven by the same underlying factors. Total operating expenses reached $10.2 million in quarter three of 2026, compared with $5.7 million in the prior year period, up 79%. Sales and marketing expenses climbed 158% to $7.7 million, reflecting the bigger scale of the business after the acquisitions, variable selling costs on higher sales volume, greater people costs as we build out the team to support the broader organization, and more marketing investment across both online and retail channels. General and administrative expenses fell 9% to $2.4 million. That decline resulted from a $4.1 million non-cash gain from the change in fair value of contingent consideration tied to the acquisitions. Without that gain, G&A would have come in at $6.6 million. That figure includes $0.7 million of business combination and integration costs, $1.1 million of amortization of acquired intangible assets, and $1.5 million of stock-based compensation. These items are either one-time or non-cash in nature. Net income for the third quarter of 2026 was $1.7 million, versus a net loss of $1 million in the prior year period. Adjusted EBITDA came to $2.1 million in the third quarter of 2026, compared with $0.2 million in the prior year period. We consider adjusted EBITDA a more representative gauge of the underlying operating performance of the business, since it leaves out items that don't reflect the ongoing cash economics. Growth in adjusted EBITDA comes mainly from adding Navitas and Terrasoul plus early realization of synergies, partly offset by inflationary commodity costs and higher marketing and selling expenses. On a year to date basis, net income came in at $1.7 million, versus a net loss of $1.5 million during the first nine months of 2025. Year to date adjusted EBITDA reached $3.9 million, compared with $0.7 million in the prior year period; now turning to our balance sheet. As of September 30, 2026, cash stood at $17.3 million versus $23.2 million at the end of the last quarter. In quarter three, cash utilization did increase, as inventory and receivables both rose because of the timing of sales and the seasonal purchase of raw materials. We expect to finish the year with more than $20 million in cash; now turning to our 2026 financial outlook; we are updating our full year 2026 guidance; for fiscal 2026, consolidated net sales should land in the range of $135 million-$140 million, reflecting a full year of Laird Superfood and the post-acquisition contributions of Navitas and Terrasoul. Adjusted EBITDA should come in between $5 million and $6 million, reflecting our strategic decision to invest further in marketing activities to drive incremental consumer demand. With that, I'll hand the call back to Jason for closing remarks, and then we will open it up for questions.

Jason Vieth

executive
#4

Thanks, Mark. In short, the third quarter shows how large the combined platform is and how quickly we're capturing synergies from it. We're moving forward with bringing Terrasoul into the fold, growing the Laird platform through new functional and high-protein products, and at the same time building strong launch platforms for 2027 for Navitas and Terrasoul. We're intentionally stepping up marketing and commercial spending, which includes roughly $2 million more in Q4 and additional increases in 2027, so we can take advantage of changing consumer habits, like the shift toward powder-based coffee and GLP-1 users wanting nutritionally dense choices. We're also rolling out Terrasoul's marketplace best practices across the portfolio and actively managing the cost headwinds facing the industry. We look forward to keeping you updated as we make further progress. Thanks for being with us today.

Eric Des Lauriers

analyst
#5

Great. Thanks for taking my questions. First, I was just wondering whether you could expand a little bit more on the marketing increases — some additional color on where the investment is going, which channels. Should we think of this — I think you mentioned more brand awareness — so should we think of it as more of a top-of-funnel kind of investment? If you could just expand overall on the expanded marketing investment outlook, that would be helpful. Thank you.

Jason Vieth

executive
#6

Hey, Eric. This is Jason. Great question, and thanks for asking it; we really wanted to take a couple of minutes to talk about that. As you'll recall from a few earlier calls, Andy Judd has rejoined the company. He'd worked with us before, then departed to lead marketing at Poppi. When Andy came back, we pretty much assumed we'd identify places to invest marketing spend in ways that would strengthen the brand for years ahead. That's what this reflects, Eric. So just as you put it, I'd view this as activation aimed more at the top of the funnel. The approach will be a blend, because while we clearly see room to build out the brand—or rather, each of the brands, meaning Laird and Navitas right now—and while we see a real chance to turn those into household names over the coming years, there's still substantial conversion upside across the different marketplaces. For Terrasoul at this point, we aren't really contemplating much top-of-funnel, higher-level marketing. It remains more of a commodity business, though a very strong brand in the marketplaces where it currently operates. We'll ease into that cautiously. We also think there's an opportunity there down the road. At the moment, though, the priority is squarely on launching the Laird and Navitas brands. Eric, I have to say this genuinely caught all of us off guard in the best way — it went right up to the board level. We conducted consumer surveys to assess our brand equity, and the results were highly consistent. Among people familiar with us, we came across as one of the very top names they know and trust; however, we discovered that awareness of us — whether Laird, Navitas, or Terrasoul — was severely lacking among consumers. Consumers are buying our brands and enjoying our products—they spot the packaging—yet our name isn't widely recognized. That's what we intend to fix, and going forward we plan to use those strong NPS and brand affinity scores to connect with a larger group of consumers.

Eric Des Lauriers

analyst
#7

Okay, that's really useful. Regarding the recent wins with Walmart, last quarter you mentioned rolling out new SKUs across roughly 1,000 Walmart doors, and for Navitas, some additional shelf space at Target. What's your initial read on how those are doing? How should we think about possible routes to keep gaining distribution with those customers?

Jason Vieth

executive
#8

Yeah, good question. I mean, it's still early. We're only in the first quarter, and clearly this is a big step for us as a natural-oriented brand in Laird, taking that brand into Walmart, and honestly even for Navitas to be expanding into Target on a larger scale. What I'd say is both are going well. We're watching closely, and we're putting a lot of pressure into those stores. Right now we're running various campaigns, not just with those two retailers wherever we can, but we're also running social campaigns around the local stores for those retailers where we have distribution, plus leveraging Instacart and other vehicles that are proving very effective. What I'd tell you is the read is still early, it's positive, and frankly it's been growing week after week, pretty much from launch onward; we still have some headroom before we get where we want to be, but we feel really confident about where we stand so far.

Eric Des Lauriers

analyst
#9

Alright, great. This is going to be my final question, and I'd just like to get a sense of where you stand on M&A. I mean, clearly there's still a fair amount of work left on the Terrasoul integration. My assumption is that we probably shouldn't be holding our breath for another acquisition at this point. If I had to guess, it's likely a second half 2027 kind of thing. Anyway, if you could just address, I suppose, first, your appetite for continued M&A in the near term, and then more broadly — setting timing aside — has the inflationary commodity cost environment affected your M&A pipeline in any way, if at all? Thanks.

Jason Vieth

executive
#10

Yeah. Okay, several points are packed in there, so I’ll attempt to address each one, and let me know if anything gets left out. Your instinct seems correct to me. At present we’ve got some work ahead of us as we proceed. Navitas was a relatively straightforward integration, and honestly we could take that business in and run it inside Laird’s existing infrastructure—systems, processes, people, and so on. In my view that went really smoothly. Terrasoul is a different animal. We've got a facility in Fort Worth, and there's definitely going to be substantial opportunity for us as we consider bringing more products into that site — whether that means shifting Laird and Navitas volumes, moving some of those volumes out of the existing network and into Fort Worth, or introducing new products. We still have some network design work ahead, so that we're truly taking a holistic view of an in-house facility alongside some very strong co-pack partnerships that we might use to balance the whole business across. There's plenty of work to do there when it comes to achieving the best cost efficiency across the now in-sourced and outsourced network, as well as implementing a combined ERP system. As I believe I've noted previously, Terrasoul operates with an ERP platform that genuinely cannot support further growth, so we'll need to migrate them onto a comparable—perhaps identical—ERP instance to the one we currently run. Considerable effort lies ahead. That effort is now beginning in earnest; we've held a kickoff and initial conversations, but we've just added a new supply chain leader along with a new CFO, and those two individuals are precisely where execution will ultimately be tested. Over the coming two weeks or so, we'll get our hands around it and set up next year's plan to get it operational. In doing so, we ultimately aim to restore ourselves to a stronger position for future M&A. I'd put it this way: we're not stepping away from the M&A market, but we would be much more cautious and careful, and at present it would take something quite special, given some of the other priorities within the business. Regarding the pipeline — well, that pipeline is still robust. Since Nexus plays such a central role in this business when it comes to strategy and board governance, we now see a much larger set of opportunities than we did previously. That pool of opportunities has expanded exponentially, which means, as you can imagine, we're able to be far more selective about which ones we pursue. We feel very confident that we have a coffee platform — called Coffee Solutions — along with a functional health and wellness ingredients platform where Navitas and Terrasoul are a strong fit. We intend to build on those two platforms and also to establish a third leg on that stool. It’s definitely still going to be there, though over roughly the coming half year, I’d guess your read on it is close to how I see it.

Eric Des Lauriers

analyst
#11

Great, and thanks for taking the time to answer my questions.

Jason Vieth

executive
#12

Sure thing.

JP Wollam

analyst
#13

Great, and thanks, guys. I appreciate you taking my questions today. Maybe we could just start on the sales guidance revision. Could you elaborate just a little on where exactly the shortfall sits relative to what you expected last quarter? And then could you also update us on what underlying growth rates you're assuming for each business at that new guidance level?

Mark Johnson

executive
#14

Hi, thanks for the question. This is Mark Johnson. We expected just about everything else to be flat. We continue to notice modest headwinds in club and DTC, which we've discussed before, and we essentially incorporated them into our fourth-quarter assumptions—so we expect that to be the primary factor behind our landing toward the lower end of the range. My apologies—I missed the second question.

JP Wollam

analyst
#15

So that was purely the organic growth that now serves as the basis for the outlook across each of our businesses. My recollection is that previously it was maybe around high single digits or low double digits for each one, but I'm just wondering if you could update us on what's assumed at this stage.

Jason Vieth

executive
#16

Hi, JP. Yeah, I'll tell you, that really hasn't changed. As we look forward, we believe that's precisely where the business sits. There'll be some unevenness; we've talked about that before. I'm certain that doesn't surprise you. Club revenue tends to be uneven, and that is exactly what we saw in Q3 with the Laird business compared with last year in particular. We will smooth out some of those uneven spots on the club side. If you think about how these businesses are expected to perform going forward, Terrasoul is doing great. From a channel perspective it sits in a different position than the other two businesses, but within the channels where it operates it is simply doing great. Frankly, we have seen much more strength in the Navitas business across some key categories, even beyond what we expected when we acquired it. We feel really good. For both Laird and Navitas, our most recent consumption figures sit in the teens, which tells us these businesses are performing quite well. One caveat I'd attach: that applies to Laird apart from refrigerated creamers, an area where we've already walked through certain difficulties. So if you set refrigerated creamers aside and consider Laird alongside Navitas, consumption is rising by double digits. Terrasoul is performing excellently too, expanding at roughly the same pace. As such, we aren't planning to revise our guidance down the road, though some unevenness should be expected. Right now there is definitely a degree of consumer attrition, particularly when it comes to volume, and also affecting certain premium offerings. Shoppers are tightening their spending. That's something we're observing firsthand. It shows up in certain price moves happening on those e-commerce platforms. It shows up among some rivals in stores, and we're experiencing the same effect on our side. There are so many strong openings for us across these channels that, especially given the marketing spend we're planning, we're confident we can keep that algorithm running smoothly.

JP Wollam

analyst
#17

All right, that's quite useful. I suppose if we look at EBITDA and the guidance and perhaps take a somewhat longer-term view here — though this is really helpful regarding that roughly $2 million increase in marketing spend. I suppose, is there anything else to consider as we think about the bridge to the reduction in the EBITDA midpoint that would carry over into next year? Have synergies perhaps come in a bit below what you'd anticipated? I'm just trying to get at whether, when you consider the longer-term EBITDA margin, that's high single digit? Has it narrowed somewhat lower? Is there anything you can tell us about the longer-term view of the operating model?

Mark Johnson

executive
#18

Yes. Hello, I'm Mark. I'll give it a try, and then I'll hand it over to Jason to add to it. Where the synergies are concerned, we've been somewhat slow to begin on a few of them. We're enjoying considerable success with the G&A synergies and intend to surpass them. On the cost of goods sold side, those came about a bit slowly given the environment we're in, but we do expect them to accelerate going forward in Q4. That's really the main factor there. The marketing component was the extra effect on the call-down for the remainder of the year. Jason, would you like to add anything to

Jason Vieth

executive
#19

Yes. No, Mark, I believe you captured that fairly accurately. JP, what I would genuinely focus on there — and it is a great question — is which items will persist into 2027 and which will not. When we bought Navitas, we did a very good job of extracting the G&A synergies from the business. Since then, we have had to put back a modest amount of cost as we built out the marketing organization. So we achieved full realization, and then we gave back a small portion, frankly, as part of a very different strategic decision, and that explains why you are not seeing as much flow through as we likely expected earlier in the year. But we view that as a structural investment in the business, and I believe it will pay dividends next year and in the years ahead. So that does not concern me in the slightest. What Mark is referring to regarding the timing of certain other synergies: when we purchased this business, we believed we would be able to procure commodities at lower prices by the end of this year, and we had largely based that on some inflation we observed in cacao specifically. That is a major part of our business, obviously, but also in other commodities, ranging from goji berries to chia to hemp, and so on. The reality is that those commodities — the higher costs — have proven stickier than we anticipated, and we believe very firmly that this reflects an environment featuring, first, uncertainty, and second, a great deal of incremental fuel costs. Those fuel costs affect us in a couple of ways, in fact, not just in the commodities themselves. Bear in mind that most of our commodities also come from other countries, with foreign exchange involved; and then we have many fuel miles involved in transporting those products as well from Asia, Africa, and South America. We are hit again, by the way, in our outbound distribution once we produce those goods. Then we also get freight surcharges from a number of retailers. We are simply not in an environment right now where retailers are — excuse me — where retailers are interested in letting you take price. Like a lot of other companies, we have been cutting costs wherever we can, operating as efficiently as possible, and holding our breath waiting for some of those costs to come back down. Will they be transient enough to decline next year? I think that is what we are trying to determine right now, and our crystal ball would suggest that at some point next year, we ought to see some relief. The timing of that, we are not exactly sure of yet, though. There will be some persistent pressure on gross margin for at least the first quarter and possibly the second quarter of next year. So at that point, we'll sort of assess where things stand, though there are cost opportunities inside our network. Those are things we're pursuing. I brought up a new head of supply chain. He has handled this many times previously. Most recently at Horizon Family Brands, he was in charge of procurement over at Horizon, and he's also worked on continuous improvement and cost reduction opportunities at Danone and WhiteWave and other very large and successful supply chains; we're putting programs in place that will accomplish the same thing and pursue all the dollars that are in play, since there certainly are quite a few of those.

JP Wollam

analyst
#20

Great. That's really useful. I appreciate you both fielding my questions. Thanks very much.

Jason Vieth

executive
#21

Yes. Thanks, JP.

Thomas McGovern

analyst
#22

Hi folks, appreciate you letting me ask, and I should say sorry upfront — I've been jumping between calls, so apologies if this has already come up. First off, I wanted to ask about the fact that both Coffee Solutions and the wholesale part of the business saw a sequential decline. I'm just trying to get a sense of how much of that reflects seasonality and how much is real softness underneath, and then I think you addressed it in the Q&A — the Walmart launch, the 1,000 stores — but do you expect wholesale to bounce back once you have a full quarter with those five SKUs in those 1,000 stores?

Jason Vieth

executive
#23

Yeah. Hi there, Thomas. How are you doing? We touched on part of this earlier, but this is a great question, and it gives me a chance to go a bit deeper. I really appreciate that. About the coffee decline you're bringing up — I had mentioned we had a year-over-year club challenge, and it's really just a matter of timing, and timing plus rotational programs too. We've moved in and out, as all of you know, we've moved in and out of creamers in a couple of regions. We've moved in and out of coffee in a couple of regions. We're up against a Q3 coffee club deal from last year that we didn't have this year. Regarding wholesale, and to circle back on your Walmart question: that launch went really well for us. We placed five SKUs into roughly 1,000 stores, and so far we're quite pleased with how they're performing. We're still pushing to lift those velocities further toward where we want them to be, but I can tell you we're clearing some solid thresholds and milestones, with gains continuing week after week since launch—almost sequentially each week. That looks promising, and I'm genuinely enthusiastic about that distribution too. Now, regarding the broader retail segment—not just Walmart—we discussed the Target business specifically for Navitas, but we've also enjoyed some solid wins with Walmart SKUs, or pardon me, with Target SKUs of Laird as well. We're witnessing genuinely encouraging business growth at both Walmart and Target within our Laird business too. Retail, liquid creamers aside, appears quite robust. The most recent consumption figure I was citing sits in the teens, and we feel truly excellent about that. Bear with me a moment, though, Thomas—I'll take that introduction so I can elaborate a bit further on the liquid creamers. We've actually been involved in this business for around six or seven years at this point, and it has been a difficult road. Of all the businesses we operate, this is the sole one that isn't a powder product or some form of dry product, I should clarify, shipped at ambient temperature, and it goes to an entirely different buyer and, honestly, reaches a lot of consumers who differ from those in the remainder of our business. Throughout that period we've stuck with it, despite the difficulty, largely because of the potential. The market is large and addressable. The SKU is highly unique. Retail clients have been telling us not to let up on it; across roughly the next twelve months we'll have to make a call on whether competing in this area truly counts as strategic for us, or if we should instead focus our efforts on the remainder of the company. It's been tough for us during this year. We've brought this up several times on prior calls, and this portion of the business has been shrinking. You just heard me touch on that when discussing consumption. My sense is that within the next one to two quarters we'll look to settle where we want to be positioned with that business, and we'll come back and give you an update on it.

Thomas McGovern

analyst
#24

Great, I appreciate that thorough answer. I know you've touched on this, but I'd like to dig a bit further. Clearly, commodity costs and fuel costs are outside your control. It seems like you're still finding your footing with the Terrasoul ERP and figuring out how that will play out. At a high level, you're very close to commodity pricing. You likely have better insight than anyone of us. Could you share what your overall expectations are for margins as we finish the year and head into 2027? Nobody can predict the future, I know, but any directional insight would help.

Jason Vieth

executive
#25

Sure thing. Mark, jump in if you'd like. What I'd say is that I've been pleasantly surprised, Thomas, at how well we've handled it. We've purchased a number of ingredients directly during this year, and we found substantial savings compared with last year. I think we simply fell short of our expectations; we anticipated a commodity market with declining prices, and that hasn't really materialized. Certain commodities that rose over the past couple of years, such as coffee and cacao, have been more stubborn. Remember, on the cacao side, conventional prices did fall as we expected; we're in the organic cacao business, and actually, most of our cacao is regenerative organic cacao. So you're dealing with a more limited market; it's certainly not as efficient, I'd say, as a traditional commodity market. We're just encountering some stubbornness, and we haven't been able to reach the numbers we'd hoped for; so looking ahead, I think we're seeing something similar to this year — we've procured a number of our ingredients and set up contracts on a number of our ingredients that keep us at a fairly flat level as we begin next year. We're cautiously optimistic that we'll see some better cost levels in the back half. Because of that, we're going to wait and watch the market a little on a few of those.

Thomas McGovern

analyst
#26

Great, thanks for spending the time to respond to everything I asked.

Jason Vieth

executive
#27

Sure. Happy to do it.

Jason Vieth

executive
#28

I'll say it one more time: thank you everyone for being with us today and for the thoughtful questions you brought. Your interest in Laird Superfood is something we always value. Although the progress we're making on integration and throughout the business is encouraging, we intend to move even faster. There are so many opportunities ahead of us, and we look forward to bringing you an update on further progress against that next quarter. Many thanks.

Operator

operator
#29

This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now-

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Laird Superfood, Inc. transcript — plus 133,000+ transcripts from 7,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Laird Superfood, Inc. earnings transcripts and 133,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $39.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.

More tools for stock research

OptionsBell: an unusual options activity scanner that tracks options flow across all US stocks and emails you when large trades appear in Laird Superfood, Inc. or any ticker on your watchlist.

StockMarketScan: a stock screener with alerts: 24 pre-built screens refreshed every 5 minutes, watchlists and email notifications. Both offer API and MCP access and fair monthly pricing.