Logitech International S.A. (LOGN) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

May 21, 2024

SIX Swiss Exchange CH Information Technology Technology Hardware, Storage and Peripherals conference_presentation 33 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Samik Chatterjee

analyst
#1

Good morning, everyone. I'm Samik Chatterjee, and I cover the hardware and networking companies at JPMorgan. For the next fireside chat, I have the pleasure of hosting the Logitech's CEO, Hanneke Faber. Hanneke, welcome to the conference, and thank you for taking the time to attend.

Samik Chatterjee

analyst
#2

I'll start you off with a few questions and just given that you reported earnings pretty recently, I'll start off with questions on the FY '25 outlook. You had Q4 results in which you essentially had 5% constant currency growth, you provided an outlook for fiscal '25 of flat to 2%. Can you just walk us through what sort of informs that outlook and some of the underlying drivers there?

Johanna Faber

executive
#3

Yes, sure. And thanks for having me, Samik. Sorry for not recognizing you just -- we just met for the first time. Yes. So we were happy with our fourth quarter back to growth, 5% top line growth in the fourth quarter of our fiscal. We have this odd fiscal that ends on March 31. And we've guided low single digits for the fiscal year ahead. And as you said, we did just plus 5%, why only low single digits. There's definitely reasons for optimism that we see. Demand seems to be stabilizing. Some of our customers are actually asking for more inventory because they're seeing some out of stocks at places like Best Buy and Walmart. And there's a little bit of a PC refresh underway as well, we believe. So those are reasons for optimism, but there's also reasons for caution. Inflation, as we all know, remains stickier than we all thought. The demand recovery is a bit uneven. And then, of course, there's all the geopolitical things that do affect us because we're a company that's present in more than 100 countries. So we're a little careful. We don't want to get too far ahead of ourselves. But of course, should the macros be better, we're ready to take advantage of that.

Samik Chatterjee

analyst
#4

Okay. Got it. You've also talked about the company being mid-single organic growth in a normal macro, but the fiscal '25 guide that you provided does have you exiting at a more modest growth rate than that. It seems like you're saying second half of fiscal '25 will be below sort of a normal macro-led growth. What's driving that? Because I would have thought you would say, I don't know if this next 6 months look tough, but the next 6 months after that looks more like a normal macro.

Johanna Faber

executive
#5

Yes. So we are actually -- and we've talked about this in our earnings report. We're -- we are seeing that the first half of our current fiscal will actually look stronger in terms of revenue growth in the second half. That's not because the demand will be stronger. We actually believe the demand will be low single digits throughout the year. But as I said before, our channel inventory is running a little low. We've been decreasing it for 2 years, which is great. We're at really healthy levels now, but maybe even a little bit too thin. And some of our customers are asking for a bit more channel inventory. So we'll be replenishing some of that with a lot of discipline in the first half. And that's why we believe sales in will be ahead of sales out in the first half, and that will reverse itself in the second half of our fiscal year.

Samik Chatterjee

analyst
#6

I mean -- maybe I'll just extend that question. If you had to project fiscal '26, would you think of it as a normal macro?

Johanna Faber

executive
#7

I certainly would hope so. Again, we are seeing things stabilize. And I believe that this company should be able to do mid-single digits top line in a normal macro, which hopefully will happen from fiscal '26.

Samik Chatterjee

analyst
#8

Okay. But we're asking all of our companies to do as well as give us their thinking of how the world looks 12 months from now in terms of demand. And you shared some of that you think -- sort of your thinking about puts and takes, the positives and negatives, but maybe break that down for me a bit in terms of the geographies. How do you think about Americas versus Europe versus APAC? And then maybe a bit more on the product side as well, which products do you think sort of or early in participating in the recovery versus a little bit more later for some of the others?

Johanna Faber

executive
#9

Yes. I think for our business, it's more about the product categories than necessarily to geographies where or the differences are not so stark. On the product categories, we're seeing gaming really coming back and really looking quite positive already. So we expect that to continue. And as a company, we play -- where we play is work and play. So play is gaming. Gaming is looking pretty strong. On the work side, I think the markets are still a bit -- well, I know the markets are still a bit subdued, and that's true in both personal work place and in our B2B video collaboration space, where we're gaining share. So we're executing very well, but in markets that are more subdued, and we expect that to continue for a little while. However, it's a matter of when that will start growing, not if, certainly, in the video collaboration space, the levels of penetration are still so low. And everyone needs to collaborate. I don't know. There's no meetings anymore than anyone attends where there's not a remote participant. So that will come back. It's just not back yet.

Samik Chatterjee

analyst
#10

Okay. Maybe just to follow up on that. So when you think about like pointing devices, for example, do you think of them as more sort of tied to play where you have gaming main drivers or do you think of them as more enterprise?

Johanna Faber

executive
#11

Both. So we have a big mice and keyboard business end point, which was fancy name is pointing devices. But big mice and keyboard business, both on the work side and on the play side. And again, on the play side, we're seeing the markets coming back a little faster than on the work side. But if I look at that business, which is what Logitech is known for historically, again, still a ton of opportunity. We call that personal workspace. If you look at the numbers, I found it quite shocking only -- first of all, less than 50% of people use a mouse or a keyboard, which is just ergonomically not very sound when you [ shouldn't ] do on your laptop. Second, of those who use it the average spend on the desk either at work or at home is $26. I mean that's less than like a Nike T-shirt, and you're using that 8 hours a day. So that's kind of crazy. So we have big opportunities to drive penetration of mice and keyboards, but also to get the ASPs up to products that are actually great for you to use every day, all day.

Samik Chatterjee

analyst
#12

Moving to a more question about a bit more longer term, I guess, you took over the CEO role recently. Since then, you outlined the strategy and one of the drive pillars that you've talked about is investing in building the brand. Curious maybe if you can outline how do you think about sort of building brand, given your background on the consumer space, how do you think about what kind of investments you need to do to build the brand further?

Johanna Faber

executive
#13

Yes, absolutely. No. And yes, I -- most of my background is with P&G and with Unilever, and I feel so fortunate to work on the Logitech brand. There's not many $4 billion brands in the world. So this is a big brand already. It's a brand with great awareness, more than 90% awareness in all of our big markets around the world. So people really know it, which is kind of fun. When you're in a taxi in Shanghai, the taxi driver also knows what you're working on, which is super fun. And it's a brand that's known for a few things. So it's known for being reliable, being good quality, being affordable. So those are all good things. It's not yet what I would call really an iconic brand, a brand that's truly loved that you cannot live without. And that won't happen overnight, but it's certainly something that we're going to be working on. And I see a few things that iconic brands do and that we can do. First of all is being super close on your mission and your benefit. So we've positioned that as extending human potential. That's what we do. And extending is a pun on the mouse because the mouse built this house. So you extend your arm. But we really extend human potential. We make you more productive. We make you perform better win that game. We help you connect better. And we do all of that in healthier, more sustainable, more equitable ways. So being super close on your mission is really important to build an iconic brand. Second, a continued focus on design and visual identity. We have a great design capability, more than 200 in-house designers. Just in the last quarter, we won more than 30 design awards. So design is really a core capability, and it's really important if you want to build an iconic brand. And then third, really to partners. You're are a brand as the company it keeps. So we're proud of working with all the big players in tech. So, we work with Google, with Microsoft, with Zoom and with Meta. And with Apple just launched the new combo touch keyboards for the new Apple iPads, two weeks ago. So we're very close to all the big players. I think we still have an opportunity to do an even better job on the right influencers, the right gaming teams, those kind of partners as well. We do it, but we can do it even better over time. And again, that's an important part of iconic brand building. And then finally, of course, there's investment into the brand. We're not going to go crazy. We've guided for OpEx that will remain at about 25% of sales. But within the OpEx, I would like to start shifting money to the [ ES ] away from the [ G&A ] by streamlining.

Samik Chatterjee

analyst
#14

Got it. You've talked about the opportunity on the B2B side as well. Just maybe share more details around that in terms of how do you sort of size up the opportunity that you have on the B2B side? And particularly, what do you need in sort of S&M expenses to support that?

Johanna Faber

executive
#15

Yes. So we're really young in B2B, right? The business has doubled since 2019. It seemed that came before me really did a great job. We're happy that it's back to growth. So it grew 2% in the last quarter. So that's good, too, but there's still so much opportunity. Compared to some of the legacy players in B2B video collaboration, we're like teenagers. So there's a lot of capabilities yet to be built. But I would say what I found is a number of really strong things. First of all, great product at a great price. Our Rally Bars are MeetUp 2 just offer a really outstanding quality, easy to use for IT departments product at a really competitive price. So that's important, and that's there. Second, the partnerships that I mentioned is very important that your software works with all the big players, especially in video collaboration, obviously, with Microsoft and also with Zoom, we have fantastic partnerships there. And third, we're a Swiss company. So our standards of data privacy and security, again, in video collaboration, are at the very highest levels and that's important versus some of our Chinese competitors in this space. So those are all good things. Again, we have more capabilities to build in the go-to-market space just because we're younger. Sometimes we're a little hard to use. So making that easier for the big corporate customers is certainly something on our list to do. And then we have an opportunity to just drive penetration. Again, less than 20% of global conference rooms are videoconference enabled. That's really, really low. And that's talking about enterprise and corporations. If you look at education, if you look at retail, if you look at health care, so much more opportunity in this space. So I'm really excited about B2B. We're going to double down on it. And from a numbers point of view, it's accretive to our business. So both on the gross margin and on operating income.

Samik Chatterjee

analyst
#16

I guess, first, just to follow up then on a couple of topics there. On the sales and marketing expenses that are required -- is it primarily in the channel? Or are there other areas that you need to invest?

Johanna Faber

executive
#17

No. First is our consumer business, it's actually -- you spend a little less on marketing, you spend a little more on overhead on people in the B2B channel. But compared to our historic or our legacy consumer business, you spend less on marketing and B2B. And we benefit from the spending that we do in the consumer channel on that brand and that product that people know.

Samik Chatterjee

analyst
#18

Okay. And you mentioned it's accretive to both gross margin and operating margin. I mean I was going to ask you more about the competitive dynamics because it does seem like a different set of players to some extent on competing, but also the enterprise -- or B2B is known for sort of volume discounts. How does that impact the eventual gross margin that you're able to do right now?

Johanna Faber

executive
#19

Yes. Gross margins are very, very healthy. So we're playing with the channel dynamics, but they're very, very healthy. And it is a competitive space. But we're used to competition. If you look at gaming, obviously, a very different set of competitors, but also a highly competitive space. Here, it's a set of more legacy older competitors in B2B, and I think Logitech has done a nice job disrupting that a little bit.

Samik Chatterjee

analyst
#20

Okay. Going back to the place where we started, which is talking about the inventory and that you've drawn down over the last couple of years. And -- now you need to put some more back, which ramps in the first half comes back down in the second half. Is that a more permanent change in terms of how investors should think about seasonality for the company? Or just more a dynamic of where we are in the cycle?

Johanna Faber

executive
#21

Yes. No, definitely, we'll continue to operate with discipline. And I don't think the actual -- seasonality of sellout changes, our third quarter, which is a holiday December quarter, will remain the biggest quarter in terms of sellout. But this year, you just will see a little bit of channel restocking to make sure we have what it takes to have perfect shelf presence, both in bricks and mortar and online.

Samik Chatterjee

analyst
#22

Okay. Going back to the outlook, again, you've talked about a gross margin of 41% for the next fiscal year. I think fair to say everyone was surprised after the gross margins you've had for the last few quarters. What's driving that? What are you sort of thinking of in terms of headwinds after doing, I think, 43%, if I remember, in the last quarter. Is it mix? Is it promotional spend? What are you trying to budget for?

Johanna Faber

executive
#23

Yes. So indeed, our last quarter was really, really strong, 43.5% actually, so very strong. But if you go back to fiscal '23, our gross margins were actually only 38%. So for the fiscal, we were just over 41% in fiscal '24. So I think it's prudent for us to be guiding at 41%. There are some -- the big tailwind for next year will be a continued focus on costs and some of those costs are carrying over. So, it's a pretty good visibility of those. So we'll keep a strong focus on cost controls, but there are some headwinds as well, and I foresee those mainly in promotional spend. We need to remain competitive. The promotional environment has been quite benign in the years ahead. And certainly, in both retail and in B2B, we need to be sure that we're at the right price levels and priced right in the key promotional periods, whether it's 618 in China or the holidays in Europe and the U.S. So promotions may be a little bit of a headwind. And then when you look at mix, that can be a headwind or a tailwind. On the product side, if we grow faster in gaming, that's a bit of a headwind because the margins are a little lower than on the workspace and B2B side. And if we grow faster in China, that's again a little bit of a headwind versus the higher margins in the U.S. and Europe. So -- but depending on where those pan out, we'll see. But at 41% is appropriately challenging, I think, for the year ahead.

Samik Chatterjee

analyst
#24

Okay. Good. I mean the way you characterize it is promotional spend, 618 in China, et cetera. Like when I take that as a -- and sort of take it forward and say, how does that impact your strategy? And how should we think about it? Is it more when we think about how do you balance revenue and margins, you're more inclined to pursue the revenue growth and give up a bit more on margin if required to drive that revenue growth. And probably the way for investors to think is there's more upside on revenue and maybe you're willing to sacrifice a bit of margin to get there?

Johanna Faber

executive
#25

Yes. I think we really have to walk and chew gum at the same time. So again, we've guided low single digits on revenue. If there's more to be had, we'll be the first to take advantage of it. But getting the business back to sustainable growth is an important thing for us to do in the next year. But at the same time, we've guided for really healthy gross margins at 41%, but also operating margins at 14% to 17%. So we have to operate with discipline to deliver the latter. And we're not going to prioritize 1 over the other. We need this business to grow revenue and deliver great margins.

Samik Chatterjee

analyst
#26

Okay. Maybe dive down a bit more into the China piece that you highlighted, promotional spend in China. What are you hoping to achieve there? What's the competitive set there? I would imagine you're not running into the same competitors as the rest of the world. But what would you call sort of a success in terms of what market share you want to get to?

Johanna Faber

executive
#27

Yes. So China, I'll be honest, has been softer for Logitech than we would want it to be. And the competitive environment in China is wildly different from anywhere else. So there are 600 manufacturers of mice and keyboards in China. There's probably 2 in the rest of the world, maybe 3 and there's more than 1,000 brands in our space. And again, there's probably 5 or 6 in the rest of the world. It's a wildly more intense competitive environment. And while we have a few strengths, our brand is very strong in China, again, everyone knows it. We're very strong on the gaming mice and also the personal workspace mice side, where we have the leading products in the markets. But we have a few weaker spaces, and we have not been gaining share there. So I've challenged my team to get more competitive in China. That starts from innovation that is suitable for the very discerning Chinese consumer, and delivering that at China speed, which is faster than the speed of the west. So we're getting our arms around that. We call that China for China, and the beauty of doing China for China, is it obviously often works for the rest of the world as well afterwards. So China for China and then China for the world. And if I look back into Logitech's history, there have been years where Logitech did that really well. So if you look at the Pebble, I don't know if you guys know that Pebble Mouse was a great mouse. That was a China for China product that then did really well in the rest of the world as well. We need to do a bit more of that.

Samik Chatterjee

analyst
#28

I carry one of those in my bag.

Johanna Faber

executive
#29

Way to go. Thank you, Samik.

Samik Chatterjee

analyst
#30

I agree with you. The -- maybe just outside of the discussions and the promotional spend. Talk to us about a cost structured longer term, a bit more in that. Where can we find leverage as you grow mid-single long term, where does the leverage come from? Is it more on the gross margin? Is it more because you've said OpEx will remain ratably sort of at 25%. How do we think about where to get leverage from?

Johanna Faber

executive
#31

Yes. I think in the longer term, we do have -- well, the first thing is really revenue leverage. So getting back to mid-single-digit growth is what will really drive scale. So that's the top priority in the longer term. But we probably have -- we have opportunities on a number of other lines in the P&L as well. If we look at gross margin, ASP, so average price is an opportunity. As I said earlier, you look at personal workspace, the average consumer spends $26, it's nothing. So the personal workspace team has done a nice job over time to drive the higher ends of that portfolio. So MX, just a great line of personal workspace products for coders and financial analyst people that are in Excel all day, really premium price, also a line called ERGO, which is ergonomically perfect. So driving ASP and therefore, improving gross margin through prices and opportunity, cost always remains an opportunity. And then within OpEx, again, I think there's some opportunity for G&A streamlining that we can reinvest into marketing to get that flywheel going on the top line.

Samik Chatterjee

analyst
#32

Okay. Good. Let's go into some of the product areas. How do you think about the gaming TAM outside of PCs when you think about either smartphones or consoles or how do you quantify it?

Johanna Faber

executive
#33

Yes. So we've talked about that in our strategy. The way we look at gaming today or what I would call play is pretty limited. We basically do PC gaming, which is a great space to be in, but there's obviously other play opportunities in the world. So that starts from mobile and console gaming. I'm excited. We're dipping our toes into the water there. In the last quarter, we launched the A50 headset, which with a single press of a button, you can switch between a PC and a console. That's doing really well, and it's driving some of our good headset numbers in the last quarter, but there's clearly more to be done there. And then you could even think of play beyond gaming. As humans, we do a lot of play that is not gaming. So we -- as a company, we do design-led software-enabled hardware, there could be opportunities even beyond computer gaming.

Samik Chatterjee

analyst
#34

Okay. I mean would that involve? How do you think about the mobile gaming ecosystem and outside of ...

Johanna Faber

executive
#35

Also interesting. So we're looking at that. We haven't quite figured out the right exact go-to-market and innovation on that, but there may well be some of that in the future.

Samik Chatterjee

analyst
#36

Okay. Turning to video conferencing or collaboration, however you want to refer to it, low penetration growth rates probably took a back sort of see it after the -- we came out of the pandemic, and we saw an initial sort of increase there and now sort of a step down. How do you think about what do you need to sort of again, trigger demand there? And what would be sort of your competitive set? It also looks like with some of the acquisitions, your larger customer competitors have done, it's a more competitive landscape probably compared to sort of a few years ago, how are you looking at the competitive landscape?

Johanna Faber

executive
#37

Yes. I mean I feel good about how we're performing competitively. So again, the market is still in decline, but we grew 2% last year -- last quarter, and we're growing share. So we're competing against a few legacy giants, but Logitech is really disrupting that market, which is great. So I feel good about us competitively. What we need is that markets to start growing again. And what's needed for that really is IT budgets are kind of flattish for most corporations from what we can see. And within that, they're having to prioritize AI at the moment, things like copilot licenses and stuff. So as that normalizes, I would see that video conferencing would be pretty kind of next on their priority list. And then office vacancies are still at a high, but we also see many companies moving into new offices, which of course, is always a great opportunity for us to sell them new video collaboration equipment. So as that ramps up, again, those are good things for the market. And we're looking forward to that coming sooner rather than later. But I guess it's a question of when, not if.

Samik Chatterjee

analyst
#38

You talked about essentially the -- how you think about the product as a software-enabled hardware right? And I know in terms of like AI as a demand driver doesn't have immediate implication on your products. But when I think what VC that has a lot of opportunity to sort of adopt AI and differentiate? How do you think about VC differentiating and some of your other products sort of using AI to differentiate?

Johanna Faber

executive
#39

Yes, absolutely. So we think AI is a tailwind for us. So in 3 ways, of course, internal productivity, we're already seeing it working, which is great. Second, indeed, in our video collaboration but also in our audio products, headphones using large data models and machine learning is really improving the superiority -- the quality of those products. And this is not new, but it's accelerating. So just last week, we launched the MeetUp 2, which is our biggest video collaboration tool with what's called Right Sight and Right Sound, that's based on large language models, which really give you the right sight, which means when you're in a room with 12 people, it knows where to focus. It acts a bit like a producer. So the AI is your producer, puts 2 people up, it's 3 people on. It zooms in on the right person, which is a really different video conferencing experience. And then it also has the right sound capability so that it gets crystal clear sound, but when you're opening a packet of crisps or you're typing it doesn't pick you up, which is what you want because you don't want to be in the view or you don't want to be hearing that. So those are examples of AI really improving audio and video quality for us, which is great. And then the third way is really -- is more software, it's us as an interface to the big guys. So we launched, for example, the Logi AI Prompt Builder, which is software that's available through every mouse and keyboard. That's a shortcut to ChatGPT. We also announced some shortcuts with Copilot and some integrations with Copilot last week. So that's another role that we can play, and that's a rule actually Logitech has played over the years. We're an interface to the big boys.

Samik Chatterjee

analyst
#40

How should we think about -- and you can talk across the portfolio focus on pointing devices as well. How should we think about the tie-in with the PC refresh cycle? And what are you seeing from your partners telling you about when do they expect to see AI PCs and that sort of integration that you talked about starting to really drive the market?

Johanna Faber

executive
#41

Yes. I don't think there's like a huge PC refresh that's here, but we do see -- again, demand seems to have bottomed out and is starting to go up. And there is no one-to-one correlation of us in PC sales, but it does help. Even if you just walk into Best Buy here in the U.S., we're often shelf together. So if someone's buying a PC, there is an opportunity to buy a keyboard or a mouse to go along with that. So it's definitely not a headwind for us if more PCs are sold, but it's not a 1:1, if I buy a PC, I'll get some Logitech stuff as well.

Samik Chatterjee

analyst
#42

And how do you think about -- what are your customers are telling you for timing of AI PCs and the integration actually starting to...

Johanna Faber

executive
#43

I think no 1 really knows. So I'll pass on that one.

Samik Chatterjee

analyst
#44

So let's turn to capital allocation and just talk about the priorities relative to how you're thinking about M&A versus buyback? You definitely mentioned that M&A is not something that's top priority on the last call. So just walk us through how you're thinking about where the investments go for the next few years?

Johanna Faber

executive
#45

Absolutely. I mean, first of all, we're proud of our balance sheet. So we ended the fiscal with $1.5 billion in cash. So it's a really pristine balance sheet, no debt. How are we going to allocate that? First of all, of course, we invest in the business as needed, CapEx. Second, we pay a dividend. We just announced another $0.10 increase in our dividend. That's important for many of our shareholders. Third priority is M&A. When the right thing comes along, we are absolutely interested, but just because we have firepower, it doesn't mean I'm going to get trigger happy. It has to be the right thing with the right synergies as a strategic buyer. And then cash left over, we will return it to shareholders in the form of buybacks, and we have.

Samik Chatterjee

analyst
#46

Okay. On M&A, how should we think about what would be interesting to Logitech. Is it, as you said, like buying iconic brands that even sometimes have seen companies iconic brands outside of their sort of technology area, right, to get that brand. But how should I think about it? Is it more going after brands? Is it more going after very specific technologies or even software to then enable the hardware?

Johanna Faber

executive
#47

Yes. So -- if I were a betting woman, I'd like to stay in those big spaces of work and play. That's what we're good at. But today, we've defined those markets fairly small actually. So if you look at work, we play only in office work, well, most people in the world don't work in an office, they work in retail, in education, in health care and construction. So there may be opportunities in that bigger workspace. And the same in play, you said it, we do PC gaming. There's more to be had in play. If you define those TAMs a bit more broadly, they actually become almost twice as big. So that's kind of the space that I'd be looking for M&A. And then what we're good at is design-led software-enabled hardware. So ideally, we would find targets that do that, so we can add synergies in our go-to-market because again, we have excellent go-to-market in more than 100 countries around the world. And in technology because we also have some great engineering. So let's see what comes along.

Samik Chatterjee

analyst
#48

Good. Okay. Let me do a quick check if anyone in the audience has a question they want to ask. Okay. If there's no question, let me wrap up with this one that I had for you. You talked about the cost focus, and I'm just wondering, when you think about the manufacturing footprint that you have, what do you see as optimal there? How much should be done in-house? How much should be done through outsourcing because we are in an industry where we see a lot of outsourcing. How do you think about the optimal structure for the company to have long term?

Johanna Faber

executive
#49

Yes, definitely a mix. We have 1 very large owned factory in Suzhou in China, which is an excellent factory, but we also have a number of really, really strong third-party manufacturers who have worked with us for a long, long time and really our strategic partners. So it will be a mix. And as the company has talked about before, diversification in terms of geography of where those partners sit is important. We all learned that during COVID. So we have diversified into Southeast Asia into Mexico, and that is likely to continue.

Samik Chatterjee

analyst
#50

Great. I'll wrap it up there. Thank you, Hanneke for coming to the conference. Thank you to the audience as well. Thank you.

Johanna Faber

executive
#51

Thank you.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Logitech International S.A. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Logitech International S.A. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.