M&G plc (MNG) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 3, 2026

LSE GB Financials Financial Services earnings 82 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Luca Gagliardi

executive
#1

Perfect. So we're live and welcome to M&G's 2026 Half Year Results. Welcome back after the summer. It is a very good set of results. So without further ado, I'll hand over to Andrea Rossi, our Group Chief Executive Officer.

Paolo Rossi

executive
#2

Thank you. Thank you. Good morning, and welcome to M&G's 2026 Half Year Results. It is a pleasure to be here with you today. In the first 6 months of the year, we have made great progress on our strategy. Despite a volatile macro environment, we delivered good net inflows from open business and strong profit growth. I am excited to see how day by day. Our vision for M&G is translating into operational and financial delivery. So let me share with you the main highlights of the year so far. In 2023, we set 3 strategic priorities for M&G. First, we focus on financial strength and simplification to set up M&G for the long-term success. Now we are delivering growth. 2025 was a good year for us. And this strong momentum continued into 2026. Operating profit of GBP 435 million is our best half results since listing in 2019. It is up 15% year-on-year, thanks to a 24% increase in asset management and double-digit growth in PruFund. Our strategic pivot is paying off, with high-quality capital-light earnings now representing 80% of total earnings. And they will continue to grow, thanks to the success of our with-profits offering. Our new With-Profit BPA called BPA Plus is a prime example of this. Since its launch in February, we have completed GBP 1.7 billion of sales, already improving on last year's total annuity volumes. And whilst driving innovation in life, we continue to deliver strong asset management performance with GBP 2.2 billion net inflows in high-value solutions across public and private markets. As we have grown the business, we have also improved our profitability. In the first 6 months of the year, our asset management cost-to-income ratio reduced by 2 percentage points to 73%, and we expect further improvements in operating leverage as we continue to transform M&G. We have delivered over GBP 250 million in savings since 2023 and will go further. We continue to simplify our business and free up capacity that we reinvest in products and services supporting long-term growth. Let's now review our financial targets. Here, we continue to make steady progress as we reach the halfway point to our 2027 targets. Our commitment to shareholders is clear. To deliver strong capital generation, to improve the efficiency of our business and to drive sustainable earnings growth, and we are delivering. Capital generation is on track to achieve the GBP 2.7 billion cumulative target. Our cost-to-income ratio improved to 73%, and we achieved record operating profit of GBP 435 million, up 15% year-on-year. In March, I told you that 2025 was a year of foundation building for M&G as we added distribution, products and investment capabilities. Now we're seeing the benefits come through. We are on track to deliver low double-digit profit growth this year as we continue to experience strong momentum with clients across the group. And the reason that I'm confident we will continue to deliver is because we have a clear strategy and the right business model to win. Our ambition is to be Europe's leading integrated asset manager. To achieve it, we will scale across both asset management and life with the growth of one segment, reinforcing and compounding the growth of the other. Live gives asset management the scale and long-term capital it needs to develop high-quality investment capabilities. In return, like benefits from this expertise with access to alternative assets that are essential to back its core propositions, including PruFund and bulk purchase annuities. The balanced and synergistic nature of this model is reinforced by the With-Profits Fund, which attracts insurance assets in a capitalized way with limited shareholder balance sheet exposure. A real competitive advantage. Another important differentiator for M&G is our strategic partnership with Dai-ichi Life, one that builds on and leverages our business model. Like us, Dai-ichi also believes in the powerful combination of asset management and life, fully understanding the value of M&G Dai-ichi decided to invest in our group. Over the past year, they have become our largest shareholder with a 15.7% position. I'm delighted by the strength of our partnership, and to announce that senior Dai-ichi executive, Hitoshi Yamaguchi, has joined our Board of Directors effective today. He brings more than 3 decades of leadership experience spanning international insurance and finance. By becoming Dai-ichi's preferred asset manager for Europe, we have gained access to the second large balance sheet, which has already allocated over GBP 1 billion to our investment solutions. At the same time, we are actively exploring a number of joint business opportunities across asset management and life, including product co-development and distribution. Having covered the group highlights, I will now move on to our segments, starting with asset management. I am very proud of the progress we have made in our asset management business. Over the last 3 years, assets under management have grown steadily, increasing by 17% to GBP 356 billion. And we have improved our diversification, becoming less reliant on our internal clients and on the U.K. market. Over the same period, external assets have increased by 29% to GBP 189 billion, with our international business increasing even faster by more than 40% and now accounting for nearly 60% of total external assets. We also remain disciplined on costs. translating higher volumes into better operating leverage. The cost-to-income ratio reduced to 73% and fee-related earnings increased by 45%. And the outlook is bright. New business momentum remains strong with net inflows of GBP 1 billion in July alone. With good client demand, the GBP 7.8 billion capital queue in private markets and new business from Dai-ichi, we are confident that we will continue to drive profitable growth in asset management. Another reason that supports my confidence is the quality of our flows. Net inflows of GBP 2.2 billion in H1 corresponds to GBP 13 million in annualized net new revenues. This proves that our focus on high-margin and high-value solutions is delivering. Both our private and public markets team achieved good results. Within private markets, client appetite for structured credit remained very strong, and we saw renewed interest in real estate. Infrastructure is another priority area for our clients, where we have strengthened our leadership team. Within public markets, equities continued to outperform, thanks to great investment performance and a compelling offering across global, European and Asian strategies. When looking at flows from a client perspective, you see a similarly positive picture. Firstly, we delivered GBP 1.1 billion of net inflows in high-margin wholesale solutions. Secondly, we achieved net inflows in the U.K. institutional market for the second consecutive period, an important milestone as we turn around this segment. And while the U.K. remains a mature market, we continue to innovate. Later this month, we will launch our new CDIs proposition, an innovative insurance-backed solution designed to optimize the investment and hedging strategy of DB pension schemes in [indiscernible]. Finally, we achieved net inflows with international institutional clients for a fourth year in a row. Europe has historically been the primary driver of our expansion. But now we have added new engines for growth. establishing strategic partnership with high-caliber institutions across Asia and North America. And you can see on this page. As mentioned earlier, I am very pleased with the quality of the performance of our asset management business, which gives me real confidence in its future. Let's now move to our Life segment. Here, I want to start by reiterating while Life is now a core driver of M&G's capital-light growth. From this year, nearly all our new business in Life is being written by the With-Profit Fund. This means that we are gathering assets in a way that is capital light for shareholders and that carries limited risk and balance sheet exposure. We expect to attract at least GBP 50 billion to the group by 2030 through these With-Profit solutions. The chart in the middle of this slide gives you a rough indication of the breakdown with PruFund and the recently launched BPA Plus driving the bulk of the volumes. These assets will generate at least GBP 100 million of annual operating profit by 2030, emerging across Life and asset management. While offering great shareholder outcomes, the With-Profits Fund also delivers superior client outcomes. Our new BPA Plus has been a great success since its launched 6 months ago and with good reason. Entering into BPA transaction is the most important decision that pension trustees can make. It influences the lives of thousands of people for decades to come. When dealing with the With-Profit Fund, trustees know that their members are protected by one of the best capitalized insurance companies in Europe. So mutual that has put client interest at the heart of everything it does for over 175 years. And they are getting a great deal too. The low cost of capital on the With-Profit Fund makes its pricing attractive. And if the fund achieves good investment returns, it shares them with customers, declaring a bonus on top of the guaranteed income. You can see why our BPA Plus has a real edge in the U.K. BPA market. And we expect to scale our sales at least by 50% this year, remaining disciplined on pricing and to achieve our target volumes of GBP 3 billion to GBP 4 billion in 2027. And as we scale, we support our growth in asset management, in particular, thanks to the significant allocation of BPAs to private markets. Within Life, we are also making good progress on our retail strategy. Here, we have 2 core objectives to drive sales. First, to improve the distribution of PruFund and secondly, to broaden our proposition with other investments solutions. From a distributor perspective, we are pleased to have launched PruFund on Scottish Widows platform. We will add a second FNZ platform later this year. From a product perspective, last summer, we launched our retail time annuity, which has generated over GBP 100 million of net inflows in the first 12 months. A good start. In February, we declared our first bonus for this product, giving customers an uplift of an extra 45 basis points to their investments on top of their guaranteed returns. So again, clear evidence of the value delivered by our With-Profit solutions. Our sales in the first half reflect this positive momentum. When combining PruFund and fixed term annuities, our retail net flows improved by over GBP 500 million year-on-year. And looking ahead, we expect PruFund to deliver improved inflows in the second half and are encouraged by the positive market reaction to our launch on the Scottish Widows platform. Before handing over to Kathryn, I will briefly cover our group transformation. In March, we completed the first phase of our transformation program, achieving GBP 250 million of savings. But there continue to be exciting opportunities ahead. as we explore ways to make our business simpler and more scalable to deliver improved customer outcomes and long-term growth. AI plays a key role on this journey, improving personal productivity and transforming end-to-end processes. It changes how we serve our clients, how we operate and how we grow. On this slide, you can see some of the initiatives we are working on. Our advisers are now spending less time on admin and more time with the customers. We are faster and more accurate when pricing BPA new business answering RFPs from institutional clients or addressing customer needs. Our research and asset sourcing teams have reduced their cycle times without compromising on quality. The core objective is always the same. To deliver a better customer experience, improve process efficiency and free up resources, which are redeployed on high-value activities that drive growth. So to sum up. We have had a good first half with record operating profit, strong flows in asset management and new product launches in life. And as we grow, we are making M&G more diversified, resilient and capital light. Through cost discipline and business transformation, we are also freeing up resources to support our long-term ambition. We are delivering on our targets and are confident we will sustain this positive momentum in the second half. And with that, I will hand over to Kathryn, who will take you through the financial results.

Kathryn McLeland

executive
#3

Thanks, Andrea, and good morning, everyone. I'll now take you through the details of our H1 results, which showed steady momentum across the group and good progress against our targets. Covering first, the key highlights. We delivered GBP 2.4 billion of net flows from open business, an increase of GBP 300 million year-on-year. In Asset Management, we continue to grow across both our wholesale and institutional channels despite the volatile macro environment. In life, flows improved meaningfully on the back of higher annuities and PruFund sales. Group adjusted operating profit increased by 15% year-on-year to GBP 435 million, our guest first half results since listing. And within it, asset management earnings increased by 24%, thanks to higher recurring revenues and improved operating leverage. In Life, by higher contribution from the capital-light with-profits business led to a 9% increase in profits. At GBP 372 million, operating capital generation was GBP 36 million lower, largely due to movements in our capital requirements in asset management and the Corporate Center. New business strain of GBP 20 million was GBP 15 million better year-on-year, despite us delivering twice the volume of BPAs, reflecting the capital-light nature of our new With-Profit BPA Plus. So thanks to this good result, we remain on track to achieve our GBP 2.7 billion capital generation cumulative target. Finally, supported by our strong operating performance, the Solvency II ratio reached 247%. So let's now turn to our flows. Closing AUMA stood at GBP 387 billion supported by GBP 2.4 billion of net inflows from open business and GBP 13 billion of positive market movements. With GBP 2.2 billion, asset management accounted for the majority of net flows equally split across our wholesale and institutional channels. And this equates to 2.4% of opening AUMA from external clients on an annualized basis. And as you've heard from [indiscernible], we delivered another GBP 1 billion of net inflows in July with good momentum across a range of public and private strategies. While we continue to grow internationally, supported by our strategic partnership with Dai-ichi Life, we're very pleased with the continued turnaround of our U.K. institutional segment, where we delivered net inflows of GBP 800 million. And thanks to our business model, we're very well placed to support U.K. pension schemes along their entire derisking journey, leveraging the capabilities of both asset management and Life. Our new CDIs solution, which Andrea just mentioned, is an example of our product innovation for these clients. In wholesale, our strong investment performance, particularly in public equities, remained a key attraction for clients. Life net flows from open business of GBP 200 million was a GBP 700 million improvement year-on-year. And this reflects GBP 500 million increase improvement year-on-year and continued growth in the BPA market, where we recorded GBP 600 million in sales in the first half. And activity has picked up over the summer as we completed a further GBP 1.1 billion in BPA transactions across July and August. We're very pleased with our continued positive growth in net flows across M&G despite a volatile external environment as we deliver the products and solutions our clients want. Moving on now to profit. At GBP 435 million of operating profit in the first 6 months was up 15%, with the key beaches being firstly, 24% higher earnings and improving operating leverage in asset management, supporting a steady reduction in our cost-to-income ratio. Secondly, a 9% increase in Life profits to GBP 375 million with double-digit growth in both PruFund and traditional with profits more than offsetting an GBP 8 million reduction in annuities due to lower returns on excess assets, which we flagged in March. And finally, the corporate center outcome was adverse by GBP 5 million, impacted by lower investment income and slightly higher head office expenses. Our operating profit is not just growing, it's also improving in quality as we increase the diversification of our business and pivoted to capital light sources. And today, 80% of our operating profit comes from asset management and With-Profits capital-light business. And this proportion is up meaningfully from 73% last year and we expect it to rise further over time as we now write the vast majority of our annuity business through the with-profits funds. So let us now look at each of our businesses in turn and starting with asset management. Our asset management business delivered a strong result, with adjusted operating profit up 24% to GBP 159 million. This was driven by a higher asset base and resilient margins, generating much improved recurring revenues. At GBP 356 billion, assets under management were up by GBP 32 billion compared to last year, supported by sustained net inflows and favorable markets. Our average fee margin remained resilient at 32 basis points as we continue to expand our business with external clients focusing on high-value solutions, particularly in private markets. We're very pleased with the quality of our flows, which generated GBP 13 million of annualized net new revenues. Together with a growing asset base, this contributed to revenue growth in the first 6 months of 10%. Costs of GBP 417 million increased by 7% year-on-year but remained flat compared to the second half of last year. And this cost base reflects our investments to support long-term growth in asset management as we added distribution and investment capabilities including our acquisition of Key Capital Partners. And as we grow, we continue to improve our operating leverage. In H1, the cost income ratio reduced by 2 percentage points for the third straight year reaching 73%, and we are confident that we can continue to improve our efficiency in the second half of the year and remain firmly committed to our 70% target by the end of 2027. Fee-related earnings, which are a key metric for us, were up by an encouraging 17%. Finally, the operating profit also benefited from a GBP 13 million increase in investment income, mainly due to improved impact from FX revaluation given the stronger dollar. Given the business momentum we are seeing and by continuing to be disciplined on costs and reinvesting capacity into growth initiatives, we are confident that we will further deliver top line expansion and operating leverage. So let us now turn to our life business. Here, PruFund's operating profit increased by 15% to GBP 129 million, reinforcing its role as a growth engine within the group. And the main driver of this positive result was the higher opening CSM, which grew strongly in 2025 and a broadly stable amortization rate. The result of our traditional With-Profits business was up by 14% year-on-year to GBP 137 million, reflecting similar positive dynamics. We're encouraged by this performance, particularly with achieved against a backdrop of lower expected returns and risk-free rates, which we previously highlighted. Both PruFund and traditional With-Profits continue to provide resilient long-term earnings for the group, underpinned by a combined GBP 4.2 billion of CSM supporting the sustainability of our future profits. As you know, we switched 2 PruFund products to a 100 charges less expenses approach from the 1st of April, which will accelerate profit recognition on new business. Let's now turn to annuities. Here, annuities profit was down 7% year-on-year to GBP 105 million, reflecting the guidance given in March. Specifically, the lower expected returns on surplus assets, which reduced to 4.5% from 5.2% last year. And these headwinds were partly offset by a higher CSM release, supported by the longevity benefit we recognized in the second half of 2025 and improved experience variances due to the non-repeat of the GBP 8 million headwind we flagged last year. This year, all annuity business was redone With-Profit Funds through our BPA Plus solution. The With-Profit Fund retains roughly 80% of the economic interest after reinsuring around 20% to the shareholder balance sheet. In due course, as BPA Plus volumes grow, we will evolve our disclosures to share more details on the different contributions from each book of business. Turning to other Life, where we generated a profit of GBP 4 million of turnaround on last year, primarily thanks to lower losses in our platform and advice business. Here, we continue to reduce costs and improve the efficiency of our digital platform, including the outsourcing of our back-office functions. Before moving on to capital generation, I would highlight the strength of our CSM, the details of which you can find in the appendix. Our group CFM of GBP 7 billion was up 6% since the start of the year and represents a large and growing store of future value for our shareholders. Turning now to capital generation. In the first half, we generated GBP 392 million of operating capital before new business strain, keeping us firmly on track to achieving our 3-year target of GBP 2.7 billion. Underlying capital generation of GBP 304 million was GBP 27 million lower than the prior year. Within it, asset management capital generation reduced by GBP 7 million, despite the higher owned funds as we experienced a GBP 14 million increase in capital requirements compared to a GBP 12 million reduction last year. And we experienced a similar dynamic in the Corporate Center, where last year, we benefited from an GBP 18 million SCR reduction. In Life, the in-force contribution reduced by GBP 10 million to GBP 340 million driven by a GBP 15 million lower return on annuity surplus assets, which we flagged in March. Importantly, Life new business gain improved by GBP 15 million to GBP 20 million despite higher BPA sales as we shifted our Life new business to a capital-light model. Management actions contributed GBP 68 million, primarily reflecting equity hedging activities, and we remain on track towards our annual guidance of GBP 100 million to GBP 200 million. Thanks to our good operating performance, our balance sheet continued to strengthen. The Solvency II ratio closed the period at 247% with a GBP 5 billion capital surplus. On bond of GBP 8.4 billion include GBP 4.8 billion of PVST. The present value of future shareholder transfers from our With-Profit Fund. And this is a unique feature of M&G, reflecting the scale and profitability of our With-Profit business. The PVST is a store of future value that has grown tremendously in recent years, thanks to the success of proband and supported markets. And this growth has been a key driver of our improved financial performance and underpins the long-term cash, earnings and capital generation of the group. We will realize this asset gradually over time, and thus expect to continue to operate above our target Solvency II range over the medium term. You will also see on this page that we've updated the definition of our leverage ratio to reflect the Solvency II value of our debt instead of the nominal value. And on this basis, the leverage ratio stood at 29% at the end of June. We made this change to ensure consistency between the numerator and denominator of the metric and to better align our approach to industry standards. This is still a more conservative approach than peers as we use shareholder-owned brands, not regulatory own funds. We're pleased with the continued strength of our balance sheet that it represents a key competitive advantage for M&G in what remains a volatile and uncertain macro environment. I will finish by briefly covering costs. Our managed cost base at the 30th of June of GBP 744 million reflects the investments that we made last year to support growth, which underpins a strong new business momentum we are now seeing. In Life, we built out our BPA team on pricing, focusing on pricing and commercial capabilities. And in Asset Management, we added private markets expertise, such as the acquisitions of P Capital Partners and Beaumont and scaled by distribution platform to support our international expansion. These initiatives drove a 7% increase in costs in the second half of last year. Since then, costs have stabilized, remaining flat over the last 6 months. Looking to the remainder of H2, we expect asset management costs to stay in line with the first 6 months of the year, while corporate tender costs will be roughly GBP 10 million higher due to the seasonality of our head office expenses. Our approach to cost management remains the same. We will continue to create capacity by streamlining our operating model, reengineering our processes, optimizing third-party spend and better leveraging technology such as AI, as you had earlier from Andrea. These savings will offset inflationary pressures and free up resources to be reinvested into growth. By investing for long-term growth and remaining disciplined on costs, we will further improve our operating leverage and achieve our target cost-to-income ratio for the end of next year. And with that, I'll hand back to Andrea.

Paolo Rossi

executive
#4

Thank you, Kathryn. Before concluding, I want to summarize the key elements of M&G's investment case. Our message is simple. We are becoming Europe's leading integrated asset manager. Our synergistic business model underpins our growth. We operate in attractive markets with clear competitive strength, including our unique with-profits fund. And by delivering a balanced combination of yield, growth and quality, we offer consistently strong outcomes to our shareholders. Life underpins our attractive dividend yield. Asset Management and With-Profits drive the group's growth. And as they do that, the quality of our profits improve. 2026 has been a strong year so far with record profits and real business momentum. That reflects the hard work of colleagues across M&G, and I want to thank everyone for their contribution to this half year results. We will build on this track record, maintain our momentum and continue delivering for our clients and shareholders. I am proud of what we have achieved, and I'm energized by the opportunity ahead as we enter this new phase of growth. Thank you. And now we'll move that I'll take my water. Thank you. And now we're going to do Q&A.

Luca Gagliardi

executive
#5

Thank you very much, Andrea. And Kathryn, we can move to the Q&A. [Operator Instructions] We'll later take questions online. A couple of analysts could have make it in the room, but they've already submitted questions, but we'll give them for last. So Andrew, Farooq and Tom in that order.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#6

[indiscernible], RBC Capital Markets. I will kick over only 2 questions actually, just for a good start. The first one on dividend and excess capital. I suppose with the shareholder solvency ratio of 247%, it sits materially above the top end of your stated operating range. And just wondering how do you think about shareholder returns going forward, especially in light of the strong capital position? Is there maybe a specific point at which you would consider a more meaningful step-up in those returns? And then second question on asset management. The private markets AUM continues to grow, which is very good to see. However, the blended margin stays flat and also the private markets margin actually decreased 1 basis point year-over-year. So just if you could share more color on what drove the contraction there? And how do you think about the trajectory going forward?

Luca Gagliardi

executive
#7

Perfect. So if you want, you've got a bonus question later, if you want to come back to it. In terms of the first question, I guess, there were 2 questions in one. One was around dividend and one is around maybe more capital return. So maybe we'll split them a little bit. I don't know, Andrea, if you want to.

Paolo Rossi

executive
#8

Yes. I mean -- and this time, I didn't show our clear capital management framework, which every time we show. I hope you remember what the 4 different things. But as you know, we have a clear capital management framework in place, and we've been on a journey in the last 3, 4 years. If you remember, in the beginning, we were focusing on financial strength, and we have been strengthening the balance sheet we have been improving our leverage, improving liquidity. And then it was about making sure we -- when the business was doing better, to actually pay out attractive dividends and we came out with a growing dividend policy 18 months ago. Let's not forget that our investors, and I meet many of them, they're very pleased with what we're doing. We have been returning back to our investor over GBP 4.4 billion since we listed in 2019 and also a double-digit annual total shareholder return. So our investors are very, very pleased with what we're doing in terms of capital returns. Now it's time for growth. We are focusing on growth. That's our focus. Those results that you see there is thanks to a relentless focus on growth and investing for growth, and that's our focus. And we will do so by making sure we have we realized double-digit IRRs above our cost of capital. So that's our focus. I don't know, Kathryn, if you want to add on something.

Kathryn McLeland

executive
#9

Well, I guess, only that we also think that 247% today is quite an uncertain volatile time. And it is a competitive advantage to have a very strong balance sheet. And one of the points I made also was we've got a great asset with the PVST at GBP 4.8 billion. We've got quite a unique own funds because of the strength of PruFund, but this really does underpin today's results. It will flow through into earnings, cash and capital generation over time, and we've got strong financial flexibility to do the growth investments that you heard Andrea talk about. So no very comfortable where we are, and we're already delivering good returns back to our shareholders.

Luca Gagliardi

executive
#10

And Andrea, maybe you want to tackle separately the dividend question. So in terms of the dividend projector.

Andrew Crean

analyst
#11

Yes. Well, on the dividend question, and as you all know, dividend is a matter for the Board. But if you look at our results today, obviously, we're very, very pleased with the AOP growth. But you should not see a one-to-one relationship in the short term between AOP and DPS. I mean there are other elements you should take into account. There is capital generation. There are the state of the business. So all these things means more you should look at it from a more longer-term perspective. Obviously, we're very, very pleased that we have a growing dividend policy, as I said before. And it's a matter for the Board. It will be discussed in February next year. But I feel comfortable with the market expectations in terms of DPS growth. I'm sure you know what the market expectations are. And obviously, it's a discussion for the Board in February next year.

Luca Gagliardi

executive
#12

Perfect. And moving on to the asset management point. So it was around private market cares and the impact.

Andrew Crean

analyst
#13

Well, I'd like to say one thing here. I mean I I'm sure if you look at some of our peers, they must be very jealous about our trajectory because we have resilience on average bits. Yes, some peers might move up, but they move up from such a low bits that it doesn't really matter. Look at our average bp at 32. I mean that's a good average bit. And of course, that is driven by strong flows in our wholesale solution at an average of 55 bps. And private markets is important for us. I mean it went down by 1 bps, I think, 37, 38, but that's mix, mix of whatever private assets we have. But if you look at our private assets, the quality and our performance, it's very, very positive. We had GBP 1.3 billion of net inflows in the first 6 months. Of that, we had GBP 1.2 billion in private credit and structured credit, and we see good momentum here. And let's not forget, when we talk about private and structured credit, this is nearly 100% Europe. I know that there are issues with private credit. It's mainly in the U.S. We have no exposure to the U.S., no real exposure to tech and software either. So we're very, very pleased with what we're doing there. And the interesting thing here as well is that we have a capital queue of GBP 7.8 billion in our private assets for our private asset franchise. So you should see resilience in that, I would say, for private markets. And of course, I took the institutional one. It's also fixed income in institutions. It's not only about private assets, we have fixed income mandates, by maintain mandates. We have equity mandates. So it's a mixture. But you should see resilience in our average margin in terms of bps, which I think is a great result.

Luca Gagliardi

executive
#14

Andrew Baker from Goldman Sachs. So I've done the introduction for you.

Andrew Baker

analyst
#15

Three questions, please. So first one, I guess, if I look at Slide 11, you're guiding at least soft guiding to GBP 3 billion to GBP 4 billion -- okay. Hopefully. So if I look at Slide 11, it looks like you're guiding or at least soft guiding to GBP 3 billion to GBP 4 billion of BPA flows of GBP 27 billion to GBP 30 billion. Given, I guess, the advantages that you've outlined versus peers, I guess, post 2027, when you hit your GBP 3 billion to GBP 4 billion target, why shouldn't we expect a material increase in flows after that? Is there any constraints to volume growth that's maybe not obvious that's stopping being a bit more aggressive there? And then secondly, just on the asset management underlying capital generation, can you just give a bit more detail on the SCR increase and if there's anything we need to be thinking about going forward there? And then thirdly, hopefully, a quick one on the leverage change in methodology. Is there any change to the 30% target level?

Luca Gagliardi

executive
#16

So probably I'd say the first one, Andrea, if you want to take it, while the other 2 for Kathryn?

Paolo Rossi

executive
#17

Yes. I think we have to remember where we come from. 4 years ago, we were not growing in our Life business in the BPA market. We reentered it. And when you look at our track record, we've been consistently growing by 50% on average every year. And of course, the GBP 1.7 billion that we have done in the first 8 months this year for me is very, very strong performance. And we have a unique feature, which is true. I mean I said it today about the BPA Plus. I mean I think the with-profit fund gives us a competitive advantage. You have all the -- I'm not going to repeat them again, the key features here. But it gives me that confidence that we can continue to grow. We will grow, as I said, this year, at least 50% year-on-year, and we will continue to grow next year. And if you look at the market, it's roughly GBP 40 billion to GBP 50 billion. That means that we have in 3 years or 4 years, moved from 0 to 6% to 8% market share, which I think is a very relevant performance. Now beyond that, we will see what we can do. And we'll see whether that can continue. Of course, we have, in my view, strong competitive advantage with the BPA Plus, but it's not only about BPA Plus. It's also about other innovation that we have brought to this market. You saw last year when we presented results, our BPA value share, where we share the economics with the scheme sponsors. And now, of course, we also launched the CDI+ for run on. So we have what it takes in order to provide a solution across whatever requirements that pension schemes are looking for. And last but not least, and I think this is a critical element because we see a lot of partnerships out there. We have the unique combination of having a very strong asset manager supporting our life balance sheet. We're very, very strong in private assets, in private credit. And as you know, there's a significant allocation into private credit and of course, also public fixed income. So we have all the elements to grow, and that's why we're growing. Let us get to 2027, GBP 3 billion to GBP 4 billion, and then we will talk about the future growth.

Luca Gagliardi

executive
#18

And maybe Kathryn, on the BPA, do you want to add anything on kind of pricing discipline and capital constraints or lack of in the With-Profit Fund?

Kathryn McLeland

executive
#19

Yes. So obviously, one of the real advantages is the lower cost of capital of the With-Profit Fund. And we're very much focused on obviously delivering these schemes and their members superior outcomes with the possibility of this bonus and the very strong backing capital ratio behind it. And we're delivering double-digit IRRs. That's what we remain very focused on. And the earnings profitability will improve over time. We're still in sort of scale-up mode. We'll get more operating leverage as we go into 2027, and the second half should also improve versus the first half. So we're very disciplined. And that's why also, to Andrea's point, we're really comfortable with the guidance of GBP 3 billion to GBP 4 billion, given what that means where we'll be in the market. And obviously, importantly, it delivers to AUM and fees for our asset management business. So I cover -- so we expected this. It does look quite unusual. Asset management profits are up 24%, and yet you've got a reduction in underlying capture. And own funds is up, obviously. So there's nothing there. We had a difficult comparator. So we had quite an unusual low impact last year. Seating numbers were pretty low compared to normal. There was an FX element as well. And that is more normalized. So it just happened to be unusually low last year, which meant we had a bigger swing in capital requirements year-on-year and again another FX element this year, but nothing in particular I would call out just a notable year-on-year delta in the capital requirements of the business. And I think on leverage, yes. So leverage, we've been wanting to do this for some time. We have now completely aligned the numerator and denominator. And so we've seen a movement, obviously, reflecting the Solvency II value of debt. and that's we're now at 29%. We do still have a range, a guidance range or a target -- not a target guidance of around 30%. And so we at 29%, so really comfortable where we are.

Luca Gagliardi

executive
#20

So Farooq from JPMorgan. While you pull out the microphone.

Farooq Hanif

analyst
#21

So 2 straight 3 questions. So firstly, on the BPA, the GBP 3 billion to GBP 4 billion that you're writing, can you tell us a little bit about what size of scheme you're targeting and what size of scheme you're allowed to target by distribution? So I mean, is it more profitable to go for middle size or small size? So just some detail around that. And then secondly, on the CDI+, can you just explain a little bit what you see as the opportunity there, the margin, how that's going to work? Is it going to be a big market run on? Or do you think it's just a supplement? And my very last question is on operating leverage. So is 70% the right number for you? I mean I know you can't give us guidance on where you're going to be in '28, '29, '30, but it feels like you're saying AI is generating efficiency, which you then reinvest in the business and remain efficient rather than AI is an overall cost reduction, operating leverage. I just want to understand qualitatively at least what you meant by that.

Paolo Rossi

executive
#22

Why don't I do the cost-to-income ratio and then you can do the EPA. Is 70% the right number? It's a target we have for the end of next year. I mean when you look at our track record, remember, we were at 79% 3 years ago. And now we're at 73%. And we have gotten there by also investing in the business. We've been investing in distribution. We've been investing in product capabilities. We've been doing some bolt-ons. All that are what I call the good costs. But we've also been very disciplined on cost because when you go and look at the last -- H2 of last year with H1 of this year in Asset Management, costs a bit flat. Of course, then there is the top line. There is market aspect, but it's the quality of the flows, which I think are critical. I mean there is a number you should remember of today is the GBP 13 million of annualized net new revenue. This is a key KPI because making flows with negative net new revenue, it's not that great. What you want is you want positive. So that shows that we have flows in the right higher margin investment solution. Private assets public equities, et cetera, and also, of course, see strong momentum on wholesale. So when I am looking for end of the year and 2027, we have the operating jaws in order to deliver that 70%, which is without performance fees. Remember, we do not put the performance fees because of the, I would say, the volatility or lumpiness of the performance fees. Let us get to the 70% end of next year. I think that is a target I'm confident we will deliver given the strength of our investment capabilities, the strength of the investment performance, capital queue of GBP 7.8 billion in private assets. and also Dai-ichi, obviously putting in more money as well. So let us get there and then we will see after 2027, what targets we go to it. But at the moment, I think 70% is a good target. And as you can see from the track record, we have been consistently improving this cost-to-income ratio by 2 percentage points per year.

Luca Gagliardi

executive
#23

And Andrea, on AI, is it like kind of a key driver of cost reduction or...

Paolo Rossi

executive
#24

Well, AI is an interesting one. I mean I -- and I -- for those who know me a little bit, I did Six Sigma in end of the '90s. I wish we had AI then, would have made my life much easier because we were transforming processes in order to improve customer outcomes. It took us like 4, 5 months to get to improve from 3 Sigma to 3.5. With AI, all this can be done. I'm not saying instantly, but it can help you substantially to improve your processes and improve, I would say, client outcomes and quality that you live to the quality to our clients. So it's something that we are implementing in a very smart way. We're very careful how we implement it because as Kathryn said, we do it only if we cover our cost of capital. It needs to deliver double-digit IRR. But we've been doing it in several, I would say, in several processes in our business. We've been doing it, and you can show the slide if you don't mind in order to grow our business. So for example, we do -- when we do now our BPA pricing, we utilize AI and that has significantly improved the speed of pricing. When we do RFPs for institutional clients, the same thing is taking it down by a substantial number. But it's also about how we service our clients. Very, very important. For example, I was up in Scotland, we have a big customer service center there. Well, the way now we resolve issues or even how we do policy management has significantly reduced the time and our operators can now work on added more value-add activities. The good news in all this is, yes, it takes down costs or it creates efficiency and productivity. But if you're growing your business, this means that I can support my growth. So yes, there should be in improvement in the, I would say, numbers moving forward. It's a bit too early to start talking about what the returns are. But surely, this will support your growth. There's no doubt about it and it will support our growth at lower unit cost. And we're a growing business, as you can see. So this is supporting our growth, profitable growth, I would say.

Kathryn McLeland

executive
#25

Going to the other questions around the BPA volumes that we're seeing. So I would -- and you've obviously seen a number of other market players give their results already. And I'm really pleased that we have been obviously delivering the GBP 1.7 billion above the GBP 1.5 billion for the whole of last year. And we're comfortable with our guidance of 50% up this year and next year. So over the, I guess, 8 months of the year, we've seen both a small and slightly larger schemes. So we've been really pleased to be able to participate at the smaller end, but also larger schemes as well. And that's important for us as we clearly are a new player. We've got great credibility with the team. [ Kerrigan ], who leads the business is here in the room today. But given our size ambitions, we're not going to be at the large end of the market that some of the bigger players who are in the market participated. And just going back to discipline on pricing and double-digit IRRs. On CDI+, so this is a product we will be launching. We haven't launched it yet. And it's designed, and this is one of the benefits of our business model because we caught this an insurance enabled product. because the benefit from all the asset management capabilities, fixed income credit, cash flow matching as well as the insurance balance sheet that gives the schemes who want to run on and not yet ready to do buying or buy out the ability to manage their cash flows, they've got liquidity that's available for payout or whatever they might need it. and also the advantage of a strong balance sheet with strong collateral flexibility, which is a real plus for some of these schemes. So slightly better economic other also, more flexibility. And again, it's the combination of an insurance business and an asset management capability, which is really, really strong in the key areas of cash flow matching. So we'll share a little bit more on the economics. It will be based when we launched the product.

Luca Gagliardi

executive
#26

I think there was first Tom Bateman from BNP Exane. Then let's go to Andrew and we could do...

Thomas Bateman

analyst
#27

Can I just ask on the profitability of PACL I think we have the numbers over the past few months. And I guess the profitability on the U.K. GAAP is quite different to what you report at a group level. So it looks like the equity position is still falling. Can you just help me understand that, if that's a concern at all? The second question is just on the tax outlook, another positive one-off on capital generation. What's the outlook for the full year? And then finally, I just want to understand the kind of the economics from writing all of the Life business on the with-profits balance sheet. You're gaining GBP 100 million of operating profit there. But presumably, you're giving something up. Could you just help me kind of put those pieces of the puzzle together?

Kathryn McLeland

executive
#28

So I think the first question was on Prudential, the subsidiary profits. Is that right? Yes. So yes, I think looking at -- you'll probably have seen the full year 2025 numbers, but the CFO in the room. And so they had profits U.K. GAAP basis, GBP 971 million. You might have seen we did a capital reserve release from Scottish Amicable Reserve into retained earnings. So that's looking really, really strong in terms of PAC. There have been, like you see in our IFRS numbers, you'll have seen some moves in terms of interest rate rises impacting statutory numbers, which affect many of our peers that you cover. And so that will have impacted the statutory numbers. And obviously, in the first half also we'll have had a ground rent impact. But they'd be sitting at around just under GBP 1 billion in terms of balance sheet equity, which is a really strong position. So -- and also, obviously, PA made more profits than it also dividends up, as you can see from their numbers. And so we -- again, what we look at in terms of, obviously, the strong capital, strong liquidity position of the group, we've got GBP 2.7 billion of equity at the holding company, GBP 2.2 billion of retained earnings, and we obviously dividend up to the holdco of GBP 700 million to keep that stable. It was a bit lower this year. We had a slightly higher employee share scheme payment at the holding company.

Thomas Bateman

analyst
#29

Yes. I think we might be talking about slightly different numbers, but I can pick up again offline.

Paolo Rossi

executive
#30

But I think the key points is almost like think about return on equity impact was GBP 1 billion last year. We have done GBP 0.5 billion of reserves shift. So it went up to GBP 1.5 billion. Clearly, in H1, you've got the impact of going rent, but we are still sitting at around GBP 1 billion. And on a normalized basis, PA generates more earnings than what it upstreams to the parent company. So that balance should grow naturally over time. Then obviously, over the last couple of years, you've had interest rates rising, which does impact as a market movement.

Luca Gagliardi

executive
#31

Let's follow up because the equity position did fall again. I'll pick it up. Yes.

Kathryn McLeland

executive
#32

We can go through those numbers. Yes. So I think it's more -- again, there's another one that perhaps we can pick up offline. You've seen historically, we had obviously the benefits in the last full year results into the tax numbers. We still have some impact coming from the loss absorbency, which impacted capital actually more than the tax numbers. So I don't think there's anything unusual into those numbers. The statutory losses obviously have a tax impact that you see. But apart from that, there's just no major impact on the numbers and nothing that we guide to at this stage either for full year because obviously, the dynamics that impact that depend on clearly the IFRS results, the capital numbers that you see and the loss absorbency that we might need or have under stress when we do all our modeling. So nothing unusual to call out here or nothing yet either for full year. And so I think the final question was on the economics. Yes. So I guess this is something that we've shown before in terms of the profitability of the products because we are clearly writing quite a different profit signature from these -- from the products that we put into the -- on the with-profits balance sheet. And so what we've said is that we'll have 10 to 15 basis points of profit on AUM that we put on the books. When we think about where that will come from, you've got GBP 3 billion to GBP 4 billion of BPAs that we've guided to. Typically, PruFund is about GBP 6 billion. We did GBP 3.3 billion growth in the first half, which is good. And we're obviously writing new business from some of the other smaller individual products. So that's the sort of numbers where you get to the GBP 50-odd billion that you can see over the next 5 years. And of course, we also have the asset management revenues also, which will be a similar margin that you're currently seeing in the financials on the internal AUM that we manage, which is about 20 basis points of revenue margin. So the guidance -- I mean, this comes through over the years to 2030. And the important point to make also is that clearly, we've become more profitable. We got greater operating leverage. We're really comfortable with our guidance. And this is very high-quality earnings, very transparent alongside also the switch that we've talked about from 90-10 to 1000 for the PruFund products, which will -- which only started on the 1st of April. So they will feature more next year and the years after..

Luca Gagliardi

executive
#33

And in terms of what are we giving up? In many ways, look, we were not in BPAs, and there's a question of whether would we be big and growing as much in BPAs if we wouldn't have the with-profit fund. So I wouldn't see that portion as we're giving up something. It's generally a new stream of business from a new product that is growing very nicely. On the PruFund side, you're right that we have always been writing PruFund and the volumes are -- we're not guiding to dramatically different products volumes. We are just simply suggesting that the profit signature will change slightly. From a value perspective on that portion of the book, it is meant to be a zero-sum game because we don't want to take advantage of the with-profit fund and the with-profit fund doesn't want to take advantage of the shareholder. It's just coming through in a more predictable, transparent fee-based nature, which we think is helpful from a public market perspective. So we had Endocrine and then if I remember correctly, there was a bid...

Andrew Crean

analyst
#34

Andrew Crean of Autonomous. Can we stay on that slide? I mean I think what Thomas is trying to get to is the counterfactual. You set a target of annuities of GBP 3 billion to GBP 4 billion. That was before this. Clearly, that GBP 3 billion to GBP 4 billion is going to be written largely out of the with-profit fund, 20% still on the shareholder fund. That means that the shareholder annuity profits are going to be less than they were. So when we look at that GBP 100 million, you're going to get the asset management profits generate. That's not an additional. Then you've got the 10 to 15 basis points on the new with-profit fund, which is GBP 50 million to GBP 75 million by 2030. What we're after is the counterfactual of what you lose in the annuity profits there. And I think expanding the question from there, I mean, you've got a very strong solvency ratio. You say you've got to invest in the business, but you're increasingly investing in the business through the with-profit funds as opposed to the shareholder. So it does come back to this question, and it's difficult to understand why there's a slightly commuden approach around dividends and buybacks. And you say you're on a journey. At what point do you think you can come back to us with a different strategy? And then finally, the last question is you've given us very helpfully the sales -- BPA sales in July and August. You only gave the net flows into the asset management business in July. How has August gone?

Luca Gagliardi

executive
#35

Maybe on the last one is simply because BPA sales are big, chunky, so you see them right away. It's hard to get them wrong. In asset management, it takes a few days after the period close to actually get the data. So it's purely due to the lumpiness of BPAs that allows them to identify them very easily in their mind, while for typically, we get asset management flows 5, 10 days after period end. So we don't have them yet and would be inappropriate to guide on all those asset management flows at this point in time.

Kathryn McLeland

executive
#36

No. So on the counterfactual on the profitability of the in-force book versus the new book, I think in terms of clearly what we're trying to do for our shareholders and not just the shareholder balance sheet of PAC, is to really improve the quality of the earnings. And it is doing capital-light business because we obviously focus on the 20% that we have in the shareholder balance sheet, which aligns interest with profit fund and the shareholder. And so over time, and it isn't over time to 2030, we will deliver those profit numbers and with those volume growth for our shareholders. So the quality is clearly coming through because it's nice and visible. It will expand in quality. We're disciplined on the capital hurdle rates that we've talked about. And the key thing is we're going to grow profits, and we've got very clear guidance out for profit growth over the next few years. And so you'll see that given that also the scale of CSM and the profits that we already have sort of locked in that flow into profits, they are very, very meaningful. It's GBP 7 billion. It's not that common to see CSM up 6%. So we're very pleased and it's GBP 4.2 billion across the with-profit fund. So that will underpin really strong profits every year depending on where CSM clearly finishes, some of the drivers of that and the amortization rate. But that really will underpin a core part of our annual profits. And then on top of that, we've got the new flow that's coming in that's got the guidance we've given that will deliver this additional GBP 100 million in 2030. And obviously, with the benefit also from asset management revenues with a 20 bps margin on that.

Luca Gagliardi

executive
#37

And again, just to repeat on the counterfactual. When we first presented the GBP 3 billion to GBP 4 billion target in terms of annuity sales, the very first time that we presented it, we also clearly stated that we were confident to getting there because we would have also launched the with-profit fund, which has been in the making for the last 18 years. It's 18 months before launch, right? So we would have not put out that target without the confidence of the with-profit fund. So on that -- I totally get the counterfactual that you're asking on the PruFund side, but on the BPA volume, we would not be where we are and we wouldn't have this ambition and this target if we wouldn't have this very distinctive and competitive proposition, which does allow us to have confidence in reaching those volumes.

Kathryn McLeland

executive
#38

So the second question was around the capital ratio and distributions. Do you want to kick that off and I can -- so we -- yes, we're operating above our range at 247%. And when Andrea talks about the capital framework, the 4 quadrants that we've used consistently over the last 3.5 years, we also have -- and given our focus is very much around investing in the business because we want to continue the growth that we're seeing. We want to continue delivering the momentum in flows and obviously hit our profit and our capital generation target. We have got a strong balance sheet at the moment in terms of the stock of CSM, GBP 7 billion. I talk about underpins earnings. The PST of GBP 4.8 billion underpins earnings, capital and cash generation over the next few years. We've got real financial flexibility, which is very good for us because it allows us to continue to invest in the business. So what we've said is we've done the GBP 4.4 billion of returns we've given back to shareholders. We only moved to a progressive dividend 18 months ago. We kept it at 2% last year despite flat earnings. Profits are up strongly this year. We've guided to double digit for full year. And one of the elements around what might trigger an increase in shareholder distributions would be sustainable earnings growth. We're only 18 months into progressive dividend. It's a really incredibly different strategy that we're now pursuing with great success in today's numbers. We do value absolutely delivering good returns to shareholders. For this year, we're comfortable with expectations, as Andreas said, and it's very much a decision for the Board. And so we've also said we would expect to be at this sort of solvency range for the medium term. So -- but shareholder returns are important to us.

Luca Gagliardi

executive
#39

So over to Abid from Panmure.

Abid Hussain

analyst
#40

It's from Pan Lum. I've got 3 questions. The first one is on fees on the new mandates. Just wondering what the fee rate is on the Dai-ichi mandates that are coming in and on the GBP 7.8 billion private capital. private markets capital queue? And then the second one is on the equity release disposal. I'm not sure if I've read that right in the release, but it looks like there is a disposal there. So just wondering what was the driver behind that? And what are you going to do with any capital release? And then the final one is on capital itself. I'm still trying to understand, just following on from Andrew's question, how do you assess the excess capital position? Is it on the regulatory balance sheet or the shareholder view of that. And I think at the moment on the regulatory -- on the regulatory basis, you're running at 180, 181. Where do you want to operate on that basis? So just trying to triangulate where do you actually want to operate that.

Kathryn McLeland

executive
#41

Sure. Do you want to start on Dai-ichi?

Paolo Rossi

executive
#42

No, I'm afraid it's on fees -- well, I mean, on fees, you have to talk. I mean, Dai-ichi in Asia. So it's -- obviously, we're very pleased with the partnership. And when I look at what we have been delivering since we signed the partnership in May, GBP 1.1 billion of inflows, and it's been 50-50 between public and private. So I don't think we're giving out on fee, what we do. I mean we're obviously treating them as a large institutional client. And therefore, obviously, higher fees in private assets, lower fees in fixed income. But it's a partnership which for us is important, not only because access to the balance sheet. You should not forget Dai-ichi co-owns Asset Management in Japan with Mizuho, a big distribution in Japan, and we are looking to do things with them. But they also are significant in Asia with a large footprint, and we're looking to see opportunities for working with them as well in Asia. So it goes beyond just access to the balance sheet. But when you think about our model, we -- the life balance sheet, asset management and in particular, private assets, we now have access to a significant second balance sheet, which, by the way, today also did an acquisition in New Zealand. So the balance sheet is increasing even further. So very, very important partnership for us. And the commitment they had of doing USD 6 billion over 5 years. We're at GBP 1.1 billion after a little more than 1 year. I mean I'm confident that, that will grow significantly in the coming months and years. So very, very pleased with the relationship. And having on board the [indiscernible] will also help to engage further and create an even stronger relationship. So more to come with Dai-ichi.

Kathryn McLeland

executive
#43

And obviously, we've got the GBP 7.8 billion of private markets capital queue that we've talked about. We answered the question on, I think, what happened in the first half, which is a bit of a mix effect in terms of private markets margin. So given the strength that we talk about in structured credit, some good demand in real estate. But overall, feeling really confident about the private markets interest that we've got with that size capital queue. And obviously, the success of our public equities market in the wholesale channels supports the 55 basis points that you see in wholesale. And actually, I would say, record revenues in wholesale in the first half as well. So -- but obviously, that's in other markets as well. So on the equity release mortgage transaction, which was a post-balance sheet event, -- you will see some notes in the financial statements about that transaction, which was -- actually, you might have seen one of our peers do something similar, but it was just to make a more optimal balance sheet structure in our matching adjustment, delivering a superior outcome across the key financial metrics that we look at. So I think we gave some disclosures around the size of the book, and there might be a little bit more at full year. But it was just basically optimizing the position there. Nothing meaningful that I would call out in terms of capital or any other benefits that we get. And so I guess back to the solvency ratio. What we've said is that we have got quite a unique balance sheet because we have such a successful with-profit fund and the PruFund has grown to GBP 73 billion, and the PVC asset has also grown to GBP 4.8 billion. And that's driven a lot of the growth also in the ratio to 247%. So we're saying that we expect to operate at about this level or above the target, the top of our target range for some time because of the success of PruFund. And obviously, we've said that this strong financial position is giving us flexibility to continue to invest in the business to drive growth, which is coming through in today's numbers and yes, continuing also to deliver good outcomes for our shareholders. So it is a higher ratio reflecting the shape of our balance sheet. But very importantly, this asset, this PVST asset underpins today's numbers that you're seeing, the great results, the answer to the earlier question around this size of earnings from our with-profits business. It also underpins the future earnings, the future capital and cash generation. So it's a great position to be in, and we're very pleased with this asset. And it just means that our solvency ratio will be a little bit higher for some -- for the medium term.

Luca Gagliardi

executive
#44

Kathryn, we -- actually, there are a couple of questions online. We'll come back. We'll make sure we ask all the question. Alejandra Chavez Valencia from Citi asked regarding to the ground rent or the legal reform bill, whether you can remind us of -- is all the impact taken? I guess there's an element of one-off impact upon announcement. And then back in February, you might recall, we did talk about an ongoing impact on AOP and capital generation. We quoted a number of GBP 50 million. So I just wanted to understand what has taken place, what will take place and are the numbers broadly in line?

Kathryn McLeland

executive
#45

Yes. So the impact in our balance sheet and our financials from ground rents that you see today are identical to what we put out in March. So it reflects the government announcement around a 40-year transition in the GBP 250 cap. So there's nothing new in today's numbers. We obviously will look at the October 28 budget. We're clearly engaging, as you'd expect with the government. We're not expecting any changes really to this position. We were prudent anyway leading up to it. We took a very conservative position on the balance sheet. I think we did guide to a modest GBP 10 million AOP impact at the end of 2028 as a result of this. So that's just the key guidance, which, again, today, we're not changing it. So it's very -- it's completely consistent with what we've given to the market before.

Luca Gagliardi

executive
#46

And just for clarity, that is an impact across AOP and capital generation roughly similar from the end of 2028 only onwards. And another question line from Nasib at UBS. He is asking whether can you do more 100 products? Basically, can't you just write everything, everything on a 100 basis on the with-profit fund? Because we referenced that 2 of our PruFund flavors are on 100. So I guess that's also what prompted the question.

Kathryn McLeland

executive
#47

Yes. So we will be moving the other final large products or sleeve for PruFund onto a 1000 charges less expensive approach, which is really transparent. It accelerates the profit recognition. You'll see it earlier in the CSM, slightly earlier recognition also in terms of underlying cap gen. And we're very comfortable that, that is the right thing to do for PruFund. No changes to other products. And it was really important for us also with the BPA Plus to have the 20% reinsurance with the shareholders so that they are completely aligned in terms of the economics and motivations and financial metrics for BPA Plus. So it would just be unproven but all prefund.

Luca Gagliardi

executive
#48

Perfect. So those were the questions online. We can come back to Farooq, JPMorgan.

Farooq Hanif

analyst
#49

Farooq from JPMorgan. I want to explore that counterfactual type question again. When you first talked about capital-light or with-profits BPA, the implication was that you would be able to accept a slightly lower hurdle rate than your peers. But given that you're aligned, you have this 20% share, are you actually just writing the same kind of IRRs that you that you would have? And associated with that, is this 20% reinsurance an annual kind of arrangement? So for example, are you able to say, okay, right, we can adjust that reinsurance rate. We feel like we want to invest capital in this because either shareholders like it again or we feel like we're getting good margins or there's a big opportunity coming. So I was just kind of wondering around the counter to the counter.

Kathryn McLeland

executive
#50

I can take that perhaps. And it's a really good question because we have got this new exciting product, which is definitely capital-light for the shareholder. If you look at the numbers, and you'll spend some time, I'm sure, after today's call to look at some of the detail in our disclosures. And what we said is we had GBP 20 million strain down from GBP 35 million last year. That's across the whole of the business. So it does reflect a threefold increase in BPA volumes. So obviously, we have strain across the whole GBP 600 million of premiums. And also, you can look at the shareholder component. Now just as a reminder, we do not reinsure longevity at point of pricing for these transactions. It remains a management tool that we can use at some point. We have a lot of flexibility given the strength of the balance sheet and our appetite for longevity risk as well. So that's an element that will impact strain. What we've talked about is obviously just making sure that we get the shareholder double-digit IRRs. That's absolutely key for us. That's absolutely key for us. So yes, essentially, the key benefit for trustees and clients is that we can deliver superior pricing -- so that's the -- so we can have the ability to deliver better economics. They have this bonus. You've already seen a 45 basis point bonus on fixed term annuities. it's obviously a different product, but it has got a lower cost of capital than a With-Profit Fund. I think in a previous call, we talked about the regulations and the With-Profit committee and how they think about profitability and what we need to do in terms of their hurdle rates for this business that Luca actually also covered earlier on the call. Happy to pick it up later. But that means that we can speak to these trustees and the consultants. And we know that we've got and Andrea talked about having this essentially neutral on the balance sheet, we have got the ability to be really competitive and also with the attractive prospect of a potential bonus at some point. So yes, those are essentially how we think about the hurdle rates. And on the 20% -- we're guiding to 20%. I think we said approximately 20%. I think we're not encouraged -- technically, we could, of course, change and put something on the shareholder balance sheet with a greater number. But we're really comfortable at that level. And I think we're encouraging people to assume that it will stay close to 20%. And again, we can be quite flexible around how and when we do that, but that's a sort of annual number.

Luca Gagliardi

executive
#51

And Farooq, what might help on the hurdle rates that you have to think about the transaction as a transaction between the BPA pension scheme and the with-profit fund. The with-profit fund will price to achieve this IRR, and that's the transaction, right? And then after that, there's a reinsurance between the with-profit fund and M&G plc and M&G will achieve its target IRRs, right? So it's very transparent, but it's almost you see the outcome as a transaction, but it's really a 2 step, and that's why different parties can achieve the thresholds that they're targeting. Cool. I don't think -- I don't see any raise then. So I think this brings the results to an end. Thank you very much for being here with us today.

Paolo Rossi

executive
#52

Thank you.

Kathryn McLeland

executive
#53

Thank you.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete M&G plc transcript — plus 256,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to M&G plc earnings transcripts and 256,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.

More tools for stock research

OptionsBell: an unusual options activity scanner that tracks options flow across all US stocks and emails you when large trades appear in M&G plc or any ticker on your watchlist.

StockMarketScan: a stock screener with alerts: 24 pre-built screens refreshed every 5 minutes, watchlists and email notifications. Both offer API and MCP access and fair monthly pricing.