Mega First Corporation Berhad (MFCB) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

August 20, 2026

KLSE MY Utilities Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers earnings 77 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Unknown Executive

executive
#1

Hi, everyone, and a very warm welcome to today's online session. Thank you for taking the time to join us. We hope that you enjoy the session. I'm Terry. Joining me today is John as well as our regular speaker, Mr. Yeow. Mr. Yeow will walk through Mega First's second quarter results and the latest development of the group. [Operator Instructions] And with that, let me hand the floor over to Mr. Yeow.

See Yeow

executive
#2

Thank you, Terry, and warm welcome to everyone. Like before, we will run through the presentation, probably will take about 20 minutes, and then we'll open up to the Q&A session. This is the agenda for this presentation. All right. In the second quarter, the core earnings were actually stable. However, the reported profit was weighed down by Edenor share of losses, which have already seized operations. So these are the residual cost that has been incurred until the final disposal of the factory and business. Normal activity is flat despite marginally lower revenue. But as I mentioned earlier, reported PBT declined almost 10% because of Edenor's share loses. The normalized PBT overall is flat, but the core earnings were actually lower. However, this was offset by higher performance in investment holding and process. On the 3 core division, packaging growth helped to cushion the softer RE and resources earnings. And the investment holding improved MYR 13.7 million, mainly because of ForEx gain. On the PAT after noncontrolling interest, it actually dropped because there's 5% income tax on hybrid earnings, but the reported PATNCI dropped at a faster pace because of the share of the Edenor as mentioned earlier. Moving to the respective division. On renewable energy, the earnings were weighed by overhaul costs in the second quarter and also currency translation loss resulting from a stronger ringgit. Revenue was down 10% and PBT was down 14%, and revenue was down because of 4% lower hydro energy generation resulting from the overhaul of second turbine. And there was also a translation loss of about 7.3%. Because of the lower revenue and also higher overhaul costs, PBT actually fell 14% during the quarter. This chart shows you the water level at Pakse in the first 6 months of the year compared to the first 6 months of 2025. As you can see, the 2026 orange line has actually -- water level has actually been lower in the last 1, 2 months compared to the previous year. But this does not have any impact on the generation because we were overhauling another turbine during the second quarter, whereas there was no overhaul in the previous year second quarter. This is the capacity factor. You will notice the dotted green line, which is the EAF for the first 4 turbines before the [indiscernible] expansion. Historically, it has always hovered higher because of the dilution from the [ fifth ] turbine. Okay. Moving to resources. Demand appears to be finding a floor. Revenue was down 11%. During the quarter, PBT was down 21%. But we do see that stabilizing. If we look quarter-on-quarter, there's actually quite a marked improvement. Revenue was up 15% quarter-on-quarter, right? PBT was up 69%. Lastly, moving to Packaging, quarterly earnings more than double because of higher volumes and also price adjustments resulting from higher raising costs. There's also a precautionary stocking after the Iran war broke. There's a bit of a panic buying. We supported the higher volume as well. The paper sales, it was softer in second quarter because of inventory adjustments and also completion selling into the U.S. The currency was not supportive during the quarter, export currency was down 7%. But PBT actually went up [ 114% ] because of higher utilization rate of the plant plus a price adjustment because of the recent price increases. Moving on to the balance sheet. The main movements of the balance sheet is shown there and the reasons thereof. There's no annual movement other than if you look at the receivable, the receivable was up MYR 52.6 million. That's purely a timing issue. The collection in June was filled over to -- from EDL was filled over to first week of June. So that resulted in an increase in receivable. Cash flow line remains strong. During the first half of the year, we generated a total cash at MYR 255 million [indiscernible], and we year-end MYR 56 million, including MYR 47 million of dividends and retain MYR 154 million cash. Debt helped reduced net debt by MYR 151 million. Out of the MYR 56 million investment deployed, a big chunk goes to the packaging side, MYR 37 million because of the acquisition of additional 12.5% payments in Stenta Films, raising our effective stake to 87.5% from 75%. The capital deployed in the first -- in the first half of 2026, is substantially lower than the previous year, down about 71%, yearly continues to improve. The net debt to equity ratio has further improved to 11.3% as a result of the robust cash flow coming from our renewable energy sector. The Board has declared a MYR 0.05 interim dividend, which is higher than the previous year of MYR 0.0475. So we will continue to step up the dividend as promised some years back. On Edenor, as you all have read from the announcements. The JMO was officially appointed on the 22nd of July. Since the JMO was appointed, the plant has been mothballed, most of the employees have been retrenched, and they are looking for buyers for the plant and business. After the retrenchment, operating losses moving forward should be naturally reduced in the second half, but we are not able to ascertain the financial impact yet because it pretty much depends on the terms of the sale of the restructuring income -- outcome. So for second half, the priorities would be conservation of cash, focus on investment in renewables and also restructuring of our nonperforming portfolio. Renewable energy will continue to be the main earnings contributor in the second half. There will be more -- there will be 2 new projects coming on stream and Solar that should help lift earnings of [indiscernible]. Manufacturing side, we're actually seeing pretty stabilizing -- stabilization of the operating environment. We actually expect resources earnings to be stable in the second half compared to the first half. And packaging, we expect continuous sequential improvement. The key uncertainty affecting second half will continue to be geopolitical developments energies and raising prices, currency movements and the terms of Edenor sales. At the end of 30th June, the capital commitment has reduced only MYR 20.6 million. And this MYR 20.6 million is mainly in our [indiscernible], which is the final payment for the solar project in [indiscernible]. Moving to the last question of outlook. Both turbines have been completely overhauled. So in the second half, we will be operating from [indiscernible] on 5 turbines to take advantage of the wet season. By the end of this year, we will have completed the 2 new solar projects, bringing our total generation capacity to 42 megawatts. We have actually started energizing the multi project and will be progressively completed until end of September. This is a snapshot of our renewable energy portfolio. These 2 projects account for 387 megawatts. Don Sahong, the CGPP solar farm and the Maldives solar. On the manufacturing side, we do expect resources to stabilize, as mentioned earlier, and the packaging continue to be covered in the second half. The key takeaway, our earnings remain very resilient. Our pivot to renewable will continue to grow the RE division. We will continue to clean up our portfolio of noncore businesses. Balance sheet continues to strengthen with net debt falling by MYR 151 million. Packaging should continue to recover as the utilization goes up and we will continue to exercise capital discipline in our future capital deployment. All right. I'll open up for Q&A. Thank you.

Unknown Executive

executive
#3

Thank you, Mr. Yeow. I think pretty much today, the questions mainly as of now falls on Renewable and Edenor. Perhaps I will just start off from renewable side first then we move on to Edenor questions. I think shareholders are asking about the green power in Cambodia. How is the feasibility studies going on? Any potential time line for development, expected [ COD? ] And are there any potential offers for this project?

See Yeow

executive
#4

We have now conducted a feasibility study for a wind project in Cambodia. Basically, in the concession land where we plant our agricultural products. The [ wind farm ] has already been installed. We will collect data for 1 year. In the meantime, we are applying to the Ministry of Energy to include that project and to feature our development program. So these are baseline concurrently. So if we managed to put in sight then and the feasibility shows that it is feasible, then we should be able to start pretty soon.

Unknown Executive

executive
#5

And how do think that construction would be?

See Yeow

executive
#6

The gestation period is a lot shorter compared to hydropower. The time is mainly for the fabrication of the wind turbines. There's not that much civil works to be conducted. So it will be much shorter than hydropower probably within 3 years.

Unknown Executive

executive
#7

Okay. Following the question actually for [indiscernible] on the hydropower side. So aside from [indiscernible] Malaysia, are there any multiple projects that are currently under evaluation for [indiscernible].

See Yeow

executive
#8

I think basically, we are exploring projects across the region. We will participate in [indiscernible] projects. We will [indiscernible]. The deadline is end of August. So it's in about 2 weeks' time. We, as mentioned earlier, we will explore the wind turbine project in Cambodia. Feasibility is now being conducted. We are also exploring a couple of hydropower projects in Laos, but everyone is still at a [indiscernible] preliminary phase. In local Peninsula of Malaysia, we are exploring the fuel project program that the government has including BESS and CRESS, and also possibly pump storage as well.

Unknown Executive

executive
#9

So with that, you brought up regarding the [indiscernible] announcement of [indiscernible]. One of our shareholders asked if there's any strategy or concessions or -- for concession?

See Yeow

executive
#10

We actually intended to participate. But this time around, the tender is a little bit different. This time around, the authorities actually free economy where the [indiscernible]. And we are right now exploring this period around this [ PMU ], we are not sure whether we will be able to participate, but the intention is there because the land that we have prepared earlier is not within the list of [ PMU ] for this round of tender.

Unknown Executive

executive
#11

And I think -- sorry, just to jump back to one of the questions on the rate. One of them actually asked, any excess capacity? And is there any estimation of impact required for [indiscernible]?

See Yeow

executive
#12

No. If we do win, it will be in stages, all right? Possibly every stage flow involve about 150 megawatts. And just as a ballpark number, per megawatt cost slightly below USD 1 million per megawatt, so you can book it up roughly between around USD 120 million to USD 130 million for [ sell-side ], doing potentially a MYR 3 billion project, MYR 3 billion project. And for any of the solar projects in Peninsula Malaysia, I think you can safely assume the cost of around MYR 3 million to MYR 4 million per megawatt.

Unknown Executive

executive
#13

Okay. I think we still have some questions regarding Renewable Energy. Should we move on to -- now, should we move on to -- I think there's another question actually on the solar side. The shareholder asked, based on previous briefing, See Yeow actually mentioned a piece of land in Johor supposed to develop [indiscernible].

See Yeow

executive
#14

Within Johor. [indiscernible] I think it's mostly.

Unknown Executive

executive
#15

Yes. He's asking, actually what is the latest update on this.

See Yeow

executive
#16

As I mentioned, we actually had a couple of land prepared for [ LSS. ] Unfortunately, the location of this land or the [ PMU ] we wanted to -- talking to are not in the list for [ LSS6 ]. So we are now looking for alternative land or maybe even appeal for our PMU to be in [indiscernible] in the West.

Unknown Executive

executive
#17

Okay. Okay. And let me just quickly go through the list.

Unknown Executive

executive
#18

Okay. One interesting question actually just came in, I asked about the [indiscernible]. Does it have any material impact towards the hydro segment? Would there be any -- any sort of magnitude in terms of deterioration of impacts?

See Yeow

executive
#19

Interesting. But as I explained a couple of times in the past, the location of Don Sahong is drawing water from a very big captive area. So the impact on climate as for a much lower impact to Don Sahong, all right? In fact, in the last few weeks, the water level is exceptionally high. It's now reached 12 meters, which is considered as critical. And in fact, too much work is also not good for Don Sahong because it will reduce the quantity such that the generation cannot be maximized. So I do not foresee the [indiscernible] having a very big impact on Don Sahong because of its location and because of how the river flows in that area where it stretches across 10 kilometers wide.

Unknown Executive

executive
#20

Actually, I think [indiscernible]. Perhaps you can see any interesting questions later, you can post. [indiscernible]

Unknown Executive

executive
#21

Maybe let us go to packaging. Packaging profit actually improved strongly compared with last year. Do you expect the strong earnings momentum in the Packaging Division to sustain until next year and the year after.

See Yeow

executive
#22

I mean, okay, we actually expanded capacity by building 2 clients, 2 years ago. The completion of the capacity expansion actually came in a very timely manner because there's quite a significant slowdown in consumer spending. And as a result, competition has been intensified and the take-up rate in the first 2 years of post completion was not satisfactory. So today, we are still operating below ideal capacity utilization. But we have been booking towards building a customer base and also building for the customer penetration on existing customers. And I think all these efforts in the last 2 years are starting to yield results. So we do expect revenue to continuously grow sequentially, and with higher utilization rate of the plant, we hope that we can continue to grow our margin as well. And this is what we are seeing in the first -- in the second quarter and also the first quarter, there is especially an improvement. But is it up to expectation, [indiscernible] because even after today, the margin is only about 5%, 6% PBT margin. Whereas if you look at historically, before the capacity expansion, when utilization was high, we managed to achieve 9% to 10% PBT margin. So hopefully, with high utilization rate moving forward, hopefully with competition stabilizing and volatility of the [indiscernible] cost is more stable, we hope to bring back margin closer to 10% PBT margin. So yes, we hope to continue to grow the Packaging over the next few years.

Unknown Executive

executive
#23

Since you touched on this, especially on [ packaging ] outlook, how do you think about the possible [indiscernible] market? And are there any customers that you actually want to contract? Is there any opportunity in Australia and the U.S. or [indiscernible]?

See Yeow

executive
#24

Okay. Let see the converting side of business mix [indiscernible] business continues to be very competitive. It's very competitive partly because the industry is a lot more fragmented compared to the upstream. We continue to work hard on the cost side of things so that we hope we can generate at least a reasonable PBT margin from the [indiscernible]. The paper side, we are now readily expanding into Europe as well. our market in the U.S., we expect continuous growth there as well as Australia. So these are the 3 key markets of our paper packaging here.

Unknown Executive

executive
#25

I don't think there are questions on paper packaging anymore. Shall we move on to [indiscernible]. Just a very quick one, it's actually posted by 2 shareholders. Just could management provide an update on the food security segment, in particular, the local modern farming and our Cambodia [indiscernible]? What's the latest?

See Yeow

executive
#26

If you notice in the slides, we now talk very little about Food Security. It is intentional becaue we were a little bit disappointed with the performance of food security. So our primary focus now is to try to turn it around without [indiscernible] We want to turn it around first before we review the longer-term plans for the Food Security. Now Food Security, we already divide it up into 2 main portions. The first is in Cambodia. So on the Cambodia side, the conflict between Cambodia and Thailand is definitely not conducive for us because previously, our sale is mainly through the border, the Thai-Cambodia border. So our primary focus now is on [indiscernible].This year it's the first year that we harvest it. The volume is very small, we only manage -- we only expect to harvest around 70 tons [indiscernible]. So if you to convert that into [indiscernible], this is pretty low. We are talking about only 1 ton to 2 ton of product, okay? So we are now building up the sales channel. So we are now building up the sales channel for [indiscernible]. We are also [indiscernible] we hope to sell to [indiscernible] to Vietnam, China and also within the [indiscernible] region. So we -- on Malaysia side, the investment in CSC, we are still trying to fine-tune the planting technique of the greenhouse has shown tremendous progress, but we are still not very happy with the quality and also the cost structure as well. So more effort needs to be put in there before we consider expanding that part of the business on a much bigger scale. We have already prepared the land. The land is already there. But before we do it, we need to stabilize the planting tactic. We need to improve the quality of the produce and also build the sales channel as well. So all these are being done concurrently. And in the last few months, we have made substantial progress. So for overall food security, we expect this year's losses will be substantially reduced. Last year, we incurred a loss of close to MYR 10 million for the entire food security. This year, we hope to reduce it to below MYR 4 million and hopefully by next year, we will turn profitable, right? A big part of it is in the investment phase, so the losses are going to be expected. And just an update, our Duran farm also gave its first year of fruits this year. The quality is okay, but not fantastic because of year 1 fruit. But unfortunately, the market is very soft because of oversupply situation in Malaysia. And also we believe because of the weather condition, this year's overall nationwide [indiscernible] is not great as well. So the prices have been depressed. And because of that, we are not able to breakeven yet this year. But hopefully, next year, when we are in year 2 maturity with more trees maturing and also more yield per tree, we hope we can make some money starting from next year from [indiscernible].

Unknown Executive

executive
#27

Understand. Management, we still have quite a number of plans to manage this segment. What if the original business plan does not progress as what we expect? And does management have any plan to enter this security segment?

See Yeow

executive
#28

Food security, we no longer treat it as a core part of our business. As I said earlier, we are now pivoting back to renewable energy. And what we have, we will try to restructure, streamline. The whole idea is we are not pledging a lot more capital into all this. We are trying to restructure. If it is not profitable or if it is profitable, we will try to see whether we can dispose it or go for IPO, like, for example, the packaging division. So all these are in the works, okay? The whole idea is we want to concentrate on renewable energy and capital deployment going forward will be primarily in renewable energy plus the hospital project.

Unknown Executive

executive
#29

We have something during the [indiscernible] Unfortunately do you think [indiscernible]? This question also back to [indiscernible]. Tell us how feasible investment study that the team has in the past before making the decision.

See Yeow

executive
#30

I mean the investment in CSC is a little bit different. It was a platform, but we are not really buying into what they had. What they had at the time was a wholesale business, right? We had a wholesale business selling dried vegetables like cabbage, [indiscernible], [indiscernible] to caterers, supermarket chains, food processing components in both Malaysia and Singapore. It was -- it's not a loss-making business. It is a profitable business now. And at the same time, we have a few farms that plant things like [indiscernible], [indiscernible], coconuts and leafy greens, right? But when we invested in that, our primary objective is to enter into the greenhouse market, okay? So of course, what they had is legacy, which we hope they will continue to build on it, but there won't be major expansion when it comes to that business. So we were eyeing the greenhouse side of things, all right? So after we came in, we started expanding the greenhouse side. Today, greenhouses have been built on 2 farms. The first farm is in [indiscernible] and second farm is [indiscernible]. In total, we have built about [ 33 ] acres of greenhouse out, of which about 14 acres have been planted, all right? So we now plant a lot of cheese and leafy greens. We are still adjusting the vegetable portfolio. We are now trying to move into salad vegetable as well, which has a better pricing. So the product mix is still being adjusted. The planting tactic is still being adjusted, the cost is still being fine-tuned while we are building the sales channel. So losses that we suffered in the past has substantially been reduced, and we think that we can turn profitable pretty soon on greenhouse side. And once all these things are stable, then only we look into expanding the greenhouse further on what we have to do. We have seen some traction when it comes to that. So we will continue to work on that.

Unknown Executive

executive
#31

I think that there are quite a number of questions actually on [indiscernible]. We try to summarize it [indiscernible]. I think many have asked regarding the corporate guarantee of close to MYR 50 million and under the JM situation, are there any further residential exposure towards this?

See Yeow

executive
#32

On what I say here because [indiscernible] is now under judicial management. This is [indiscernible] rule. So what the JM has done so far is they have stopped the operations, have shut down the plant with a cold shut, but can be reactivated for whoever that buys it. And they have opened up for bidding. Several bids have been received and they are now doing their due diligence. The due diligence will take some time. We hope the due diligence can be completed by September or October. And once the due diligence is done then only the bid will be a firm bid, okay? So we are now giving the JM some time to do all this, all right? So until a firm bid is received, we will not be able to know what is the financial impact to Mega First, whether there's a need for impairments either on the assets or on the bank guarantee, right? Now if I want to look at it on a macro level, the debt has already been reduced very substantially from close to MYR 0.5 billion at one stage to now probably on a net debt basis, slightly more than MYR 300 million. The working capital is being unwound is probably 80%, 90% complete. So what we have left is the land and building and the plant, all right? So whoever is looking to buy is to buy the plant and the land and also the remaining working capital that is left in the company. If we are bidding that based on, say, for example, book value, then there won't be any impairment. I'm just thinking to the extreme. Let's say, they don't pay anything, then the loss is potentially MYR 300 million loss. So it depends on how we look at it. But from our perspective, it is already a closed chapter because the operation has ceased. There is some residual cost to maintaining that plant right now and -- but it's not very material. And we hope to complete this before this year-end, okay? So there will still be some losses on the operations side because we still need to service the interest, we still need to pay for some salaries for the remaining staff that is keeping the company intact plus security guards and all those. But the expenses have been brought down to the minimal while the JM is going through this exercise of finding a buyer for the plant equipment, okay? Second quarter losses is amplified by the retrenchment costs, right, because we have retrenched more than 90% of the staff and that is quite painful because the staff have been with the firm for -- a lot of them have been there for more than 20 years, right? So we went by the law and compensated the staff in accordance with the law and the agreement for the union workers. Why do I say it's a closed chapter because it's not going to be reactivated by us. And whatever loss that we will eventually suffer depending on what the price of the disposal is going to be a one-off event. And then after that, we will just move off, all right? And the losses is something that is extremely painful, but it's something that Mega First Group can still absorb, right? But we want to close this chapter, yes, but hindsight is a mistake, but we learnt more from it.

Unknown Executive

executive
#33

I think with one question, I think Mr. Yeow with one answer that you have given, you pretty much addressed all I would say the majority of the questions that was raised, but I think one of our shareholders actually raised a very good question is, if we will stand at a postmortem point of view, based on this, well, a very successful investment, did Mega First learnt anything out of this?

See Yeow

executive
#34

Yes, of course, we learned a lot out of this. I think one of the key things that we've learned is don't go into something that we don't know. Of course, at that time, when we went in, we were dependent on taking our [indiscernible] and we did not expect the performance to be so disappointing, right? So yes, on hindsight, we should not have, but it's been done and we are trying to stop the bleeding by picking the bullet and just move on. I think the Chairman has given apologize during AGM for this decision to invest in this business. So yes, and that's also one of the reasons why we have decided to pivot to something that's something that we know and we are [indiscernible] and where we can have better control over the direction and the management of the company.

Unknown Executive

executive
#35

I'm sure whether this question can be addressed, but one of them that this is something that we do not see in daily life given 50% involvement individual stakeholder [indiscernible]. Is it, how do I call it? Is the individual going to the 50% of the losses for the company?

See Yeow

executive
#36

Legally that individual, I wouldn't say the neutral, but the other shareholders from [indiscernible] Technology is [indiscernible], right? But given that the guarantee is [indiscernible] and given that they have limited financial strength, it's highly unlikely that they will bear their share of liabilities. So it will eventually fall on the shoulders of Mega First.

Unknown Executive

executive
#37

Okay. I think, in a nutshell, in general, questions are mainly addressed. Perhaps we move on to a couple of questions regarding hospital. I think one of them raised about the, I would say, questions on -- it's a funny question because they asked will the hospital project become a second [indiscernible]?

See Yeow

executive
#38

We don't think so. We are -- for the hospital side, as you know, in the hospital industry, ability to attract doctors is one of a few key success factors because good doctors will naturally bring in patients. We have studied demographics there and we felt that, that place is suitable to build a hospital. And the doctors are also stakeholders. In this case, they are not a salaried doctor. So we have -- as a whole, we are pretty confident that we will succeed. And continuing to the question, how long do you think the period would be for hospital, I cannot say what it will be for us, but it is common for a hospital to take 2 years to 3 years to be profitable right? Of course, we hope we can shorten the period given that we're going to kick off with a relatively big group of doctors, established doctors. So we are hoping to cut short turnaround time.

Unknown Executive

executive
#39

Okay. Pretty much I think that's all mostly for the hospital side. Maybe, Terry, I'll pass on to you for resources.

Unknown Executive

executive
#40

A couple of questions on resources. [indiscernible] Asked, we have not seen capital investment in resources division [indiscernible]. Would you consider selling the Resources division to focus the RE later on? And I'm sure that actually your competitor is somehow expanding. So what's Mega First's plan?

See Yeow

executive
#41

Competitors are expanding? Now this resources business is a very [indiscernible], but a good business, right? It generates very stable and strong cash flow. There's a geographical captive market because of the logistic consideration. The players are concentrated in where the limestone reserves are. And there are not that many around the region, especially for reserves, limestone with low impurities. The impurities must be low enough before it can be classified into good line, okay? This industry has undergone consolidation over the last 20 years, I would say. It used to be fragmented in Malaysia, but now it's been consolidated essentially into only 3 players, okay? And we are the only local left. The other 2 players is, one is a Canadian listed company called [indiscernible], and the other one is a Belgian company called [indiscernible], which is the world's largest producer. So these are the big boys, they are global players, right? And within Southeast Asia or within this region, they are all based in Malaysia, okay? It tells you one thing is this is where the good results are. This is where the legal framework is conducive for them. This is where logistic arrangements are the most efficient to supply to the region, which includes east side of India to southern side of Australia and on the east side all the way to the Philippines and the north side up to Taiwan, okay? So this is a market basically serviced by players in Malaysia and also there's one player in Thailand and small players in Vietnam. It is stable, it is not influenced by international prices because it's not internationally traded. So there's no paper speculation. It is essentially -- it is something that is essential, cannot be replaced by any substitute. So we do see this demand being a very stable demand, okay? And we are making good money out of it. Of course, 2 years ago, there was an exceptional profit because we kind of keep on increasing prices catching up with the price increases. And today, after the massive expansion which was completed, I think, a few years ago, we have not yet fully utilized the capacity, all right? Today, we are running on average around 35,000 to 40,000 tonnes a month. And we can actually bring the production all the way up to 50,000 to 55,000 tonnes if necessary. So we do have sufficient buffer for now, okay? But what is happening is the domestic consumption of lime is actually on a decline because of the changes in the supply chain for steel in Malaysia, all right? All the steel companies are gradually going towards the Chinese and the Chinese have a different way of managing the supply chain. So the consumption of lime in Malaysia is on a decline as a whole. So now we are building the export markets more aggressively, including to Australia and also to India as well. But India is a little bit more volatile because of the volatility in the freight rates. If the freight rates are too high, you just can't be competitive selling into India. So we are happy with it we sell it. Not for now because it is a very strong cash flow business. And we also do not want this to end up in the hands of the foreigners. At least for now, the foreigners interested to buy answer is definitely yes, because we have a better price control if they do that. But no, we don't have any intention to sell them.

Unknown Executive

executive
#42

Let's go back to the hospital project a little bit. This shareholder asked how much the hospital project CapEx will be, and what will be the expected CapEx?

See Yeow

executive
#43

The hospital project is divided into Phase 1 and 2. And within Phase 1 is further divided into Phase Phase 1a and Phase 1b. Based on phase 1a, the estimated total project cost is between MYR 450 million to MYR 500 million. We have recently awarded the EPC to Persona. And I think Persona made an announcement to recently, and that is for MYR 238 million, okay? And this total budget will be incurred over the next 3 to 4 years. Construction will take -- we have just started. If you go to the slide now, you can see the holding now and the mobilization of heavy equipment as well. So the fact it's just next to the [indiscernible].

Unknown Executive

executive
#44

I think we have covered resources, all speaker. I think another last question on [indiscernible]. Would there be any plan to list the Packaging division and [indiscernible]?

See Yeow

executive
#45

As I mentioned in the past, we are looking at options. IPO is definitely one of them or some form of collaboration is another or even a trade sale is a possibility. So we are looking at all this. Based on the track record of the Packaging division, we actually do already qualify for an IPO. We generated MYR 21 million PBT last year. And this year, I think that should improve. So we do qualify, but we felt that it is not yet timely because we want to bring our profitability to a much higher level first, right, given that going to IPO with a smaller market cap doesn't make sense even the cost of this thing in Malaysia [indiscernible]. So unless you have a decent profit base and revenue base, it doesn't really make sense to go this way. So hopefully, we can do this in the next 3 years or 3 to 5 years.

Unknown Executive

executive
#46

Okay. I think now instead of looking into a division basis [indiscernible], one of the question that was asked that, are there any other noncore business that management is actually considering to dispose? Are there any factors to be considered prior to the [indiscernible]?

See Yeow

executive
#47

I think our priority now is more on how we intend to allocate our future capital, all right? So for example, when we say we're going to pivot to means that the future capital deployment will be focused on [indiscernible], okay? But it doesn't mean that within the other noncore divisions like, for example, food security, there is no CapEx. It doesn't mean that. It just means that from a H2 level, we are not going to pump in or spend a lot of capital on M&A or invest even more into that division, right? So for those already invested, we are exploring various options to see how -- what is the best way to take this forward, okay? So if we think that there's better M&A opportunities, then we may even get out of it, right? But just bear in mind that whatever investments that we have done, they are stakeholders, okay? So our options are to evaluate what is the best option for stakeholders. For example, [indiscernible] is a family run business, right? We have to think about them. We can not say, sorry, I'm not going to take care of you. We're going to move on. You do your things and that's it, right? We have to work together with them and find the best option that serves their interest as well, okay? But we are not going to put in like a lot of money into them given that, that's not our capital deployment policy moving [indiscernible]?

Unknown Executive

executive
#48

Okay. Thank you very much. I think this is quite a frequent asked question is that, are there any consideration for the privatization of [indiscernible] based on recent movement of price by the company itself?

See Yeow

executive
#49

Not being talked about, not being evaluated as far as I know. I think we are trying to work things out within the group, all right? Yes, it's a cleaning up year. Yes, we have not delivered big projects for the past few years. And we are trying to change that, okay? Once this thing is cleaned up, you will probably see our profitability closer to normalized profit that we have been disclosing. So one of the reasons why we changed the reporting format to show normalized versus reported is to give an idea to the reader and our shareholders what it should be without all these noises, all right? And we are in the process of clearing up all these noises. Of course, the biggest hurdle is ethanol. So ethanol has been a drag on our earnings. Without ethanol, we would have been a lot more profitable. The good news is it's already been shut down. So to us, it's a closed chapter. It's just that we have not yet fully quantified what the loss may be. But once you quantify, it's a one-off event, it's something that Mega First can still afford it. It's painful, as I said, not that we should lose this money, but it is something that Mega First can afford it and then we move on from there, right? And as I said, assuming it sell for nothing, the maximum loss is MYR 300 million.

Unknown Executive

executive
#50

Okay. And I think this is also a very wide asked question. What is your view on the moving forward dividend for MSC?

See Yeow

executive
#51

Okay. I think we have actually delivered, largely delivered what we undertake to do. If you look at the dividend yield table, maybe I just called it out. If you look at the dividend table, it has been growing, right? And 2026, despite a sharp drop in our profit, we will continue to grow the dividend, okay? We want to keep it a lot more steady because we do anticipate that if one or more of the RE projects kick in, we will need quite a fair bit of capital, okay? As I said, the [indiscernible] project is more than $3 billion project, okay? [indiscernible] is going to be more than MYR 600 million project, at least for the first phase. So we have got to anticipate that there may be some projects that we will be undertaking. So we wanted to be a little bit more steady in how we give up dividends, right? Right now, yes, our gearing has dropped substantially, and we hope to further strengthen the balance sheet in anticipation of these projects coming through.

Unknown Executive

executive
#52

Okay. I guess, I think, pretty much we have answered most of the questions. Almost covered everything [indiscernible] There is a question on share buyback. Would MSCB actually start to buyback shares? I think we...

See Yeow

executive
#53

I think share buyback is less compared to share purchase by shareholders. I cannot comment on the major shareholder. But as far as Mega First is concerned, I think, again, we are preparing all right? We are preparing -- we are trying not to be too -- we really try to conserve some cash, right? Because there could be some liabilities coming up on ethanol side, right? There could be new projects coming along for Mega First. So we still try to conserve cash, okay? But [indiscernible] chooses to buy more shares from the market and how much he buys when to buy, we are not in a position to comment.

Unknown Executive

executive
#54

General one. Since AI is [indiscernible] now, is Mega First actually going to be involved in any part of AI [indiscernible]?

See Yeow

executive
#55

We are the renewable energy company. Our involvement in AI, if anything, will be to supply green energy to data centers? Are we working on it? The answer is yes, but we want to do it, yes, provided the returns are reasonable and also provided the counterparty risk is manageable. So why counterparty risk is important because a lot of people talk about AI being a bubble. A lot of people are already speculating are these data centers going to be fully utilized. There's already discussion on deflationary pressure. So for those who invest these few years may end up owning up an elephant because the upfront investment cost is way higher than future investment cost needed to set at the same capacity, same plant. So we have got to make sure because we are only an energy supplier. And as an energy supplier, the returns cannot be phenomenal, right, because we don't take the risk of power distribution. [indiscernible] taking the risk of power distribution, data center undertake to the data center that they will be able to fulfill the data center demand regardless of how the weather performs and how much solar energy we can generate for that data center, okay? So we have to consider this very carefully, all right? And if the counterparty risk is high, then we should not go into this business because you are yourself for the next 15 years, 20 years, and we don't know whether the AI bubble burst unless you are dealing with the hyperscalers, [indiscernible].

Unknown Executive

executive
#56

Okay. I think that pretty much wraps up all of, if not most of the questions. Okay, maybe I'll ask one question [indiscernible]?

See Yeow

executive
#57

Investment in is meant to be long term, right? It's not meant to be a trading block, right? Would we consider selling definitely not at this price, right? Do we intend to sell? The answer is no. We don't have immediate plans to sell. ICT companies, investment in ICT companies, it is still there. It's not making losses. It is slightly profitable, but nothing big. Again, we have got to explore options on ICT that is in line with the interest of our business partners. but we have no intension to [indiscernible] much larger [indiscernible].

Unknown Executive

executive
#58

Maybe very last question if you can address, [indiscernible] why not [indiscernible]? What is base dividend maybe 30%, 40% that [indiscernible].

See Yeow

executive
#59

I mean, of course, we can think about it. But our preference today is to gradually increase it until we reach a certain sustainable payout. But ultimately, it will still be a function of what projects we're going to get. As we stand, are we happy with the balance sheet strength? I think we can further strengthen it. We are not even averse to having a positive net cash position, right? So until such time that we have a reasonable amount of positive net cash position, will we consider changing our [indiscernible].

Unknown Executive

executive
#60

Okay. I'd say that's pretty much the briefing for today. We thank you, everyone, for participating. Thank you for your questions as well.

See Yeow

executive
#61

Thank you, everyone.

Unknown Executive

executive
#62

Thank you very much.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Mega First Corporation Berhad transcript — plus 253,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Mega First Corporation Berhad earnings transcripts and 253,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.