Nestlé S.A. (NESN) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
September 8, 2026
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Warren Ackerman
analystOkay. I think we've been told to get on with it. So that's what we're going to do. So delighted to welcome Nestle to the stage and CFO, Anna Manz. Thank you, Anna, every year. You're very supportive of our conference. We really do appreciate that. And a lot to discuss. I'm probably going to sort of kick off maybe big picture talking about your favorite topic of real internal growth and the kind of the ambition to get to the 2%. In the first half, you're kind of tracking, you're sequentially improving, I think you about 1.5% and you've still got some headwinds from U.S. pet care, Europe. Maybe you can sort of just share your kind of confidence that you will be able to get to that kind of steady-state 2% algo. And maybe which businesses are you happiest with are tracking and which of them are kind of maybe further away from that kind of 2% level, a good place to start.
Anna Olive Manz
executiveSo you're right. That is my specialest subject. And we're making really good progress. We've now had full solid quarters of rig-led growth. And you see Q1 to Q2 improved from a 1.2% rig to a 1.8% rig. And if you look at our performance in Q2, we're actually about that 2% number now in coffee and pets. And we're right around there on confectionery, food and snacks. So the thing that's holding our rig is nutrition, and that's largely the infant formula recall. And there again, we're making really steady progress in terms of that, and we're on track. Looking forward, what gives me confidence around sustainable rig-led growth. Firstly, is the resource allocation that we're doing. So the work that we've done to really describe those categories where there is structural growth well ahead of the rest of the category. So those subcategory areas. 30% of our business sits in those areas. And there in the first half, we're growing over 7%. And that incremental investment in that space should see us accelerate. So that resource allocation is important. I think the other thing that's important with respect to regulated growth is execution. Yes. And there, again, absolute focus on if you've got the right taste, the right price versus the competition, the right distribution and visibility, the right media, then we're gaining share and growing. And there isn't any bit of our business where we haven't got those things right where we're not growing. So that's what gives me confidence moving forward. SP1 To be above 2 on rig, but to be consistently over 4% on organic growth.
Warren Ackerman
analystBut I guess within that, North America is your key geography, 35% of revenues and the rig, I think, was flattish. I think you described that as not acceptable. Clearly, you need to be more to get to the 2% of the group. As you look across the North American portfolio, what's your kind of outlook for the U.S. consumer -- and then how much of that kind of gap, I guess, the flat versus the 3% is kind of explained by category headwinds versus sort of internal execution -- because I guess getting that North America piece really moving is going to be a key unlock.
Anna Olive Manz
executiveYes. Yes. So no, we weren't happy with performance in Q2 on North America, more to be done. And the consumer was not the dry. I mean the consumer is weak in North America, but it hasn't deteriorated. It's consistent. There's kind of 3 things going on in North America in the quarter. Firstly, you've got weak category growth in frozen food, and I'll talk about that for a minute. You then got a couple of areas where we are underperforming the category. So that would be Gerber and creamers, and I'll come back to those. And then you've got a third bucket where there's a bit of phasing noise in the quarter associated with retailer inventory levels, timing of price increases. That, I'm not at all worried about. That's just timing phasing. You can ignore that third one. Yes. So maybe then just to focus on the first 2. Firstly, the category as a whole is in slight decline. It plays to the more challenged area of the consumer. Equally, there are big pockets in that category that are growing much faster. And the sorts of trends that where we're seeing that faster growth is around world cuisine around high fiber, high protein, around actually the very small pack sizes or the single pack sizes and then the big family value packs. So it's about making sure that we're playing in the right places in the category to really take advantage of the growth that is there. We are doing a better job of that. Our performance is improving. There is more to do to be consistently growing. Gerber, we've talked about before. It is a journey to turn that around. And the proof point on Gerber will be really the Q1 shelf reset. For those of you that haven't followed the Gerber journey, but I suspect most people have. We've been talking a little bit to the Yoga versus the busy working on -- so not glass jar, we need pouches. We need the formats, the flavors. We've got that right now. We've been working on that with retail over the last year. We've got product in production, but the annual shelf reset is really when we should regain our shelf space. And then the third 1 is creamers, and that 1 annoys me. It annoys me because some of our issue in the quarter was production, and that really isn't acceptable. So we've made the interventions there. Really good momentum on the fast-growing part of the category. A bit more to do on Coffee mate, but good progress. So in short, the U.S. consumer, we're not seeing material change. It is all about our execution. We're making good progress with coffee and pet. And there's a couple of areas where we know we need to do better, and we are intervening and you're seeing that improvement, and you'll see it come through.
Warren Ackerman
analystI mean maybe just double clicking on U.S. pet food because it's your best most important cell and you talked about like a temporary sort of destocking because retailers no longer need as much safety stock given you've got wet cat capacity. But how can we be sure I suppose, it's a 1 quarter issue because at the same time, we are seeing more generalized destocking happening across U.S. retail because U.S. retailers are taking a more cautious view about the outlook for the U.S. Just trying to understand, do we kind of just look at the sellout of cat and dog and then kind of conclude that if it's a 1-quarter issue, it should marry up in the third quarter as the sellout data that we can see on Cateno. I'm just trying to sort of -- you say it's like a bit of a nonissue. But I think for the market, people are still a bit worried that it could you beyond 1 quarter, I guess, so that's impact that I would point you to the sellout data because that really tells you what consumer offtake is -- and that really tells you around the momentum and the health of the brand.
Anna Olive Manz
executiveAnd you're seeing very strong sellout performance through Q2. But for those of you watching the scan data, that strong sellout in cat is continuing. And there -- so firstly, cats are growing, growing 2% to 3% as people go back to work post-COVID, Capstar and easy pet to have. And cats from a CFO's perspective, they're just -- they're brilliant because you premiumize in Cat because your cat enjoys the experience, and you can see your cat enjoying the experience or you're getting better connection with your cat. The lovely thing about cats is they're super picky eaters. So if you give them a better food, they won't go back and eat the old food -- and that is why being able to innovate into the cat space is wonderful because it gives the opportunity for the consumer to trade up. And that's what you're seeing actually drives the wet cat category now. So it's growing kind of 7%-ish the fact that we've got capacity, and we're bringing all of our flavors into it, that's what's driving it. So you see the momentum. In terms of kind of the stock issue in the quarter, -- there was -- I mean, there is a slightly broader retailer desire to manage cash flow and stocks, and you see that more generally. And we had a bit of a double whammy on pet food specifically because -- when you've got a project that you are being inconsistent around supply, the retailer algorithm seeks, particularly if that product is a product that is got great consumption and is being pulled off the shelves. The retail algorithm looks to try and get more than its fair share of that product. And so they order more. I mean you see the order volume go up significantly if you're in poor supply. -- and retailers hold on to safety stock. And so what you've seen is that situation reverse as we've come back to full capacity, and we're now supplying very consistently, the safety stock has fallen at system.
Warren Ackerman
analystAnd your market share is in U.S., are you happy with them?
Anna Olive Manz
executiveGrowing nicely. Yes.
Warren Ackerman
analystOkay. Interesting. Maybe moving to coffee because coffee has delivered pretty strong growth for you guys over the last 2 years, driven by pricing. But as coffee prices moderate and pricing contributes less to grow, what does the kind of coffee growth algo look like? Because from the volume data we can see at the moment, it does look a little bit softer. I know you took a high single-digit price increase from Starbucks at the end of the quarter. So you would expect some kind of elasticity from that. But how has that kind of continued? Are you -- is there anything around coffee on volume that is causing any angst or is it very much in line with how you see it tracking?
Anna Olive Manz
executiveSo maybe just to deal with Q2 specifically, and then I'll talk a bit broad about coffee. So Q2, I think we saw slightly weaker volumes in the U.S. And to unpick that, Nespresso grew very nicely with high single-digit growth and volume growth. Nescafe grew very nicely with, again, high single-digit growth and volume growth. And there was an impact in the quarter specifically with respect to Starbucks where we took price. So -- and the way to think about coffee is I know we think about my mom when I say this. Most people have have coffee in the cupboard as well as out that they're using. And so when you take price on coffee, -- the first time the consumer goes shopping, and they see the higher price. I think, well, I've got coffee in the cover. I don't need to buy more this time. Let's see if it's on promo next time I go shopping. And you often see a couple of weeks of that cycle and then as the stocks dwindle, you then buy more. And that's why you see an initial volume reaction right after a price increase. We've seen it again and again, and then it normalizes. -- that's what we're seeing in the U.S. More generally speaking, good structural growth in coffee. What we're seeing is coffee move beyond the the traditional need to date of hot and first thing in the morning, into refreshment, indulgence, functional. We're seeing convenience, so RTD. And experimentation, actually, with the younger population really really grown all of those things as structurally driving coffee. With respect to us, we are really focused, therefore, on those areas of the category that are exhibiting faster growth. So specifically cold. There's much more cold coffee drunk in coffee shops than at home. And so really driving the offerings to capture that opportunity. RTD coffee, so it's a convenience, driving portion coffee because we have a small share of portion coffee in the U.S., which is a significant opportunity and then continuing to drive penetration of Nescafe across the emerging markets. And so that will systematically drive the category. And to your innovation question, it is all about innovation. To give you an example, to take coffee into the refreshment space, we've launched a Starbucks refresher concentrate, which is a clear fruity concentrate made with green coffee, so it has some caffeine -- it isn't taste of coffee. It's a fruity drink. And that takes that cafe refreshment moment into the coffee aisle and the recruitment that we're seeing with that product, I mean, huge purchase intent in that much younger generation that don't necessarily make their way into the coffee aisle and then great refill. So that's how we keep recruiting into the category.
Warren Ackerman
analystI'm going to maybe switch gears. Anna, talk a little bit about emerging markets because there's so much focus on the U.S., your Asian rig has been super impressive and quite broad-based some investors sort of think maybe that's you benefiting from supply chain challenges from local players, maybe you can hit that? Or is it just that the underlying food and beverage markets are just in quite good shape in those regions? And maybe you can kind of unpick a little bit what's happening on the ground move, which brands are contributing and sustainability, I suppose, of this I think it was mid-single-digit rig in the region. Just if you can help us a little bit unpack it.
Anna Olive Manz
executiveSo we've got really, really good broad-based growth across the emerging markets. And I'll put China to 1 because that's probably a different question. And that's across both Lat Am, Asia as well as Africa. And we have -- I think 1 thing because people always ask about China and India, India is 5% -- China is 5% of sales. But we have 6 or 7 markets that are in that 2% to 4% of sales size across the regions, so Brazil, Mexico, Central and West Africa, the Philippines, Malaysia. So really, really broad-based exposure. What we're not seeing particularly is a change in the underlying economy. So it's not consumption driving growth. It is market share-led growth. which is a good thing. And that, frankly, is coming from this consistent improvement in execution that we're driving across the group, coupled with an improvement in our innovation pipeline. And that is what is allowing us to sort of very consistently execute.
Warren Ackerman
analystYou said on that China is a different story. And of course, it is I think we're about a year on from the China reset. Maybe you could share your thoughts with kind of how it's going, how you feel about the work that you've done on the ground in terms of route to market and making it much more consumption-led rather than distribution sort of push.
Anna Olive Manz
executiveYes. So a year ago, we said we needed to drive a consumption-led model in China because for a good number of years, we have been driving growth in China by driving distribution of our brands from Tier 1 to Tier 4 plus cities, and we haven't done a good enough job of driving the consumer pool. So what you've seen us do over the course of this last year is, firstly, revisit our route to market. So consolidate distributors where we had a few places where we had too many take some stock out of the system where, in some cases, it was a bit aged. And we've also reviewed our own sales forces. So you've seen us do things like combine what was effectively 3 different infant nutrition sales forces across illuma, NAN and the specialty brands into 1 very targeted sales force. You've also seen us do things like reduce our SKU count. So China is a very fast pace market. Innovation is really important. And we had done a lot of innovation, but it meant that we ended up with a proliferation of SKUs. And actually, what we've done is focus it right down so that we're bringing the right pace of flavor innovation, for example, in coffee, -- so where we're bringing the sort of rapid flavor innovation, but we're doing it on a rolling basis with real focus on which SKUs were driving. And that is helping us move from a place where we weren't seeing volume growth, for example, in TD, and we are now. We've also been very thoughtful about what influences and which -- what things our consumers are particularly focused around. And so for example, Sharp wafer, which is a confectionary product. linking up with some gain, some games and doing some special edition packs is really connected with the consumer group that consume that brand. So being really thoughtful about how we're doing brand marketing and influence and marketing. So good progress overall, but more to do. I would say the end markets are still challenged. So our categories in China are still declining in value terms to as a category. So it's going to take us a little bit of time to go from a share loss situation to consistently holding share and then outperforming our categories. though obviously, now we're through the destock, we're going to have a period of easier comps comps aside, I'm really focused on our market share and performance versus the category where we're seeing stabilization and some improvement.
Warren Ackerman
analystI mean 1 of the interesting things covering it for a while that seems interesting how nearing portfolio choice you had 10% that was high growth initially. That's now 30%, and you're skewing your investments it's really nice to see you breaking out the marketing spend between the high growth and the core, so we can see that skewing. Can you talk about that journey that Neste has been on to kind of deaverage the portfolio? Because can that get to 40%, 50%? And how do you do that while still protecting still the other 70% the core because it seems like that's a massive change in the way since you've been CFO, how you're allocating capital within the business.
Anna Olive Manz
executiveThe averaging is a really good phrase because we did tend to set the same target for everything. Yes, so we are being really thoughtful about resource allocation and being really clear on where those pockets of growth are. And you're absolutely right, we are then putting disproportionate investment there, and we are tracking those business cases. not on an annual basis, which was the historic way of doing it, but quarterly, and we are reallocating capital as we go. So if there are subcategory growth areas where we're seeing really good traction, then we will be putting more money behind it. And if we're not getting the traction, then we'll go back and revisit why -- and that is absolutely helping us. Now when you think about that 30% of areas where we've got really high category growth, so things like cold coffee, RTD coffee, therapeutic pet diets, et cetera. They are all with the same brands as we're selling in the core. So it's not some brands are winning and some brands are losing. It's that we are using the same brands to both deliver against the needs of the core. So in my case, I am a lifelong Nescafe drinker, and I will continue to drink it. But at the same time, the cold variant or Nescafe espresso concentrate is bringing in that new young consumer. And my kids are coming in. because it's the same brand, the investment helps both -- and we were talking about our kids going to university earlier. My daughter has just gone to university. She had been drinking that cafe espresso concentrate in making these wonderful creations at home. That when we did have back to university shop, she bought Icera, so standard Nescafe soluble to take the university with her. So that is an example of how being in these growth areas actually is an investment in the brand as a whole. So that is exactly how we think about it. It's not just about resource allocation. It's also about A&P effectiveness. Yes. And that's the other area then we've made quite a big shift to make sure that we are then tracking those metrics to understand that we're getting the returns on the investment. So for example, nonworking was in the high 20s. It's now sub-20. We need our investment to go into working media, not nonworking media. We need it touching the consumer. We've reduced the number of brands that we're actually putting media investment into from 400 to 120. That's not because we are damaging those other brands. They are things like Carnation milk. You don't need media on combination milk. You need brilliant in-store promo. You need brilliant activation but not media. So getting super clear on what needs what? And then as we've taken the data set that we have to really drive detailed sort of marketing resource econometric tools across the group, that allows you for each brand in each country to look at what the appropriate marketing mix is to optimize performance and really make sure you're investing in the right places. So those 2 things together, resource allocation at a big level, -- and then marketing mix optimization at the local level is what's really helping us be much more effective about where we put.
Warren Ackerman
analystAs well as CFO, Anna, you got the other half of M&A as well. So you've been pretty busy on that front as well. Now you've obviously made big moves on ice cream, partnering in water, the exit of VMS. Would you say now that the portfolio changes are largely complete? Or do you still see kind of scope for further simplification? And I guess, equally on the other side of the equation, I know big deals are out, but in terms of bolt-ons, are there any sort of specific kind of sort of technologies or subsectors, which you are kind of interested in? And the M&A landscape, generally, how do you kind of see it? I know the priority is organic, but I'm sure you're always looking outside to see what capabilities you could potentially bring in. So are we done on the disposals and then on the bolt-on side, what's interesting?
Anna Olive Manz
executiveSo you're right. I mean we are always looking outside to make sure we fully understood the environment that we're in. And actually, that's 1 of the things that Philip really actively calls out around driving an external focus in Nestle because we can be too inward looking. And that does see us look across the landscape in every way. In terms of focus at the moment while we've announced waters and VMS recently, the workload for the business isn't done until we actually close those transactions. And so while in your mind, we're done. Actually, there's a lot to do to now carve these businesses out and work through that. And I say that because One of the things that Philip brings, which I really enjoy is and raise a sharp focus. And the single biggest way for us to drive shareholder returns right now is organic growth accelerating growth, improving margins, improving cash returns. And when we've got the business we own really motoring, that puts us in much better shape to do bolt-ons. It also means if we dispose of anything, we're disposing of it at higher value -- so where we are at the moment is working through the 6% of sales that we currently have underway is frankly about the limit of what we can do without distracting the business. while we really focus on driving that underlying piece. In terms of the future, as I say, we continue to look at the broader environment. And we will continue to take action if we don't think we're the best owner. And in terms of bolt-ons, I think having reviewed 10 years of transactions, we are at our best when we are bolting on things that are relatively close to our core skills. The river size that have an impact in more than 1 country. where we put great resource around seeing it through. So think Starbucks. So you'll see us look for transactions where we're super confident that we will deliver returns.
Warren Ackerman
analystI'm going to move to large language models and product discovery. If the next generation of consumer choice is determined by AI agents rather than traditional advertising, what's Nestle doing today to win that battle for recommendation. What gives you confidence that Nestle can actually outperform in a large language-driven model. Again, it's an area you're doing a lot of work on, but I have to get a little bit of sense of where you are and I mean the journey never ends, but where you -- how you're feeling?
Anna Olive Manz
executiveIt's a really interesting area and large language models, I mean we track on a daily basis to the extent to which large language models are -- AI is interrogating our websites rather than humans, and it's growing by the day. And so this is an area where we and everybody else is very, very focused. Think of it as firstly, it's really important to understand the context -- and what I mean by that is having the data to understand how consumers are prompting in our categories is really important and what prompts they are using. And we work with third parties to do that. And it's not always obvious. The profits that you think your consumers are making as a marketing director is not always the same as what the truth is. So live tracking of that is really important. And then knowing how that you show up against those prompts, it is also really important. And again, we are now measuring that consistently. And not just that, making sure that we make available, the data set that we have out there to show up, well, because it's not just about showing up well as a brand name. It's also about being 1 of the cited places that people -- that the terms go to for information. And this is where years of R&D research and all of the data that sits behind our brands is actually super valuable. So -- whilst what I've just described is simply understanding how the consumer is prompting and then optimizing how you show up. What it takes to do that is a few things. firstly understanding that, but then having the clean labels, the data to make available so that as the RMs are looking for research on those subjects, we're making available all of our knowledge that will make us cited in those areas. And I think years as a -- Nestle's -- there's emotional marketing and then there's substance-based marketing. And our debts in R&D means that we have a huge amount of deep knowledge and data that we can provide. So you put all of that together it's quite an exciting area.
Warren Ackerman
analystThe other big topic I'm sort of jumping around here, and apologies is margins. Yes, I think on gross margin, Nestle is still quite a long way below sort of pre-COVID levels for lots of different reasons. But going forward, yes, cocoa and coffee have gone back up again on El Nino. But presumably, you're -- you've covered lower down, so that actually despite the short-term increase in raw materials, that's not going to be -- is my assumption, a near-term impact in the second half. Can you talk a little bit around how we should think about margins, particularly around the raw material story because clearly, they're moving hugely dynamically. And then when you overlay that, you've got a lot of cost savings running through the margins as as well. So kind of how confident are you that actually we do start to see that, a, that gross margin moving back and then that Utah margin actually getting to that 17%, which still allows you to fund the A&P to drive the top line. So I know it's a long question, but in terms of the margin, the raw mats versus the savings, I guess, are the 2 sort of -- the deltas maybe you can touch on?
Anna Olive Manz
executiveYes. So I think there's 3 different things in there. And I'll start with, I'm confident maybe just on the first one, short term, coffee, cocoa, ups and downs. Just very quickly on that point. To be honest, the way we're managing it is we have agronomists on the ground pretty much all over the world. And yes, there's a lot of speculation in coffee. I'm far more interested in what I'm hearing about how the flour is developing, which is the data that we are getting back that allows us to kind of have a view through to the underlying harvest and through the medium term rather than have to sort of manage our way through the daily ups and downs in trading. In terms of first, and then maybe I'll talk about the longer term. Just so how to think about H2 margins. There are a lot of moving parts. So -- and maybe before I jump into actually, just to remind you, the guidance that we've given on margins for the year, we've said that Utah margin will be better in 2016 than in -- and we've said that H2 will be similar to H1, and we said that gross margin will improve. And that guidance we gave without any tariff refunds in there. So if we do see tariff refunds in the second half, that will be on top. Kind of clear on that. Can you hear me? Yes, on your back. I'm back. So the moving parts on H2. Firstly, we'll see a slight benefit on coffee and cocoa coming through the second half. We do see more of a headwind around fuel and energy around the Middle East because we were well hedged in the first half, but we see that impact coming through in the second half. Tariffs, refunds aside a neutral because we're lapping a period where we already have tariffs. Advertising spend will be at similar levels, H1, H2, just to kind of shape that for you. And in cost savings, we had about GBP 600 million in the first half we're confident that cumulatively will be on track for EUR 2 billion in the second half, which means naturally, we should see a little bit less in the second half. That said, if we're making good progress on cost savings, we won't be we won't limit ourselves to the GBP 2 billion. Rig leverage will come through. And of course, pricing, as we roll over, as we move past some of the rollover pricing from last year will be lower as you see it all flow through. So those are the moving pieces of H2, which underpin H1 and H2 being similar. Your bigger question around where the margins go. We have great brands that we are investing in. We are innovating consistently margin accretively, and we innovate and we are investing to drive our pricing power. So overall, our brand should continue to maintain the margin levels that they always had. And though in the short term, when we see some headwinds because of inflation, we can't it takes a little while to adjust a little while for it to come back. There's no reason why it shouldn't come back. So medium-term margins, I am confident of -- and our routes to being consistently above 17%. It's just about doing more of what we're doing -- so I'm very comfortable of that. And as I say, we've always said 17% is a floor. We won't be limited to that. But through the cycle, we should be consistent.
Warren Ackerman
analystHow should we think about that rig leverage? Because obviously, the break is 1 or 2 or 1.5 in terms of the drop-through the margin. Because I guess that's the bit sometimes as analysts, it's easy to underestimate coming from a place where volumes have been negative historically, when you start to see the volume but really picking, I guess, it depends on where is the rigs coming through?
Anna Olive Manz
executiveYes. I can't give you a rule of thumb, but rig leverage is very helpful in our business -- and within rig volume and you're seeing accelerate rig and improve the quality of our rigs. So we're seeing that volume come through as well. all of which will help support consistent margin improvement. And that's why you should obviously expect to have business through the cycle to be consistently above 17%.
Warren Ackerman
analystAnd final question, Anna. I mean if you kind of get through this period and you look forward to 2030, and you've got through the fixing the execution, simplifying the portfolio, rebuilding growth. If you and I sort of sat here then in 2030, and Nestle has been successful. What would look fundamentally different about the Nestle then compared to Nestle now. I know we have a crystal ball type question. But just interested to know, given your time as CFO, kind of how far through getting back nest later or the financial reference point the sector that you historically always were and surprised to be going forward.
Anna Olive Manz
executiveSo I don't know how to answer that 1 because I don't have a crystal ball. But maybe just to give you a sense of where we are in our journey I think we are really confident of the journey that we're taking. If I go back 2.5 years ago, there wasn't confidence in the organization that we could consistently grow market share nor was their confidence in the organization that we knew how to drive cost efficiencies. Nor that we could accelerate rig. I think where we are in our journey now as an organization, we are really confident that we know what to do. when we have the right price, the right taste, the right distribution, the right media, we gain share. when we invest behind those areas that we -- that there's higher category growth, guess what, we grow faster. And when we lean into taking on simplifying the organization, we deliver efficiencies. So we've now built the playbook. Are we execute -- we're a long way off of executing that perfectly at scale all the way down the organization yet. We're in 180 some countries -- and so it takes time to build both the capability, the shift, the clarity all the way down. So I think what we've got is a really clear playbook. We know the playbook works. -- and there is a lot of value yet to be created. And so we are pretty early on our journey that value creation, and that's what's exciting.
Warren Ackerman
analystWell, listen, Anna, thank you for your time. I think we're on the buzzer. Anna is going to be doing a breakout. So if anybody wants to join and hear more about Nestle room next door. For those staying here, Danon is on next. So see you can choose either. Thank you very much, Anna.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Nestlé S.A. transcript — plus 254,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Nestlé S.A. earnings transcripts and 254,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.