OPENLANE, Inc. (OPLN) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
August 11, 2021
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Ryan Brinkman
analystHi, I'm Ryan Brinkman, the U.S. automotive equity research analyst at JPMorgan. Thank you for joining us for the 2021 JPMorgan Automotive Conference. We're ready to get going with our next presentation. Very excited to have with us, KAR Global, including Peter Kelly, KAR's Chief Executive Officer; and Eric Loughmiller, Chief Financial Officer. Maybe Michael Eliason somewhere in the background, Director of Investor Relations. Peter and Eric, thanks so much. We appreciate you taking the time.
Peter Kelly
executiveThank you, Ryan, delighted to be here.
Eric Loughmiller
executiveThank you, Ryan.
Ryan Brinkman
analystAbsolutely. I think I have permission to go right into questions, right?
Ryan Brinkman
analystSo Look, the first question, and I get a lot of inbound questions on the digital dealer-to-dealer business, right? So recently, this business of yours has begun to grow much more quickly, much more quickly than before and much more quickly than the competition even, right? So -- in the first quarter, for example, your digital dealer-to-dealer business grew 81% year-over-year versus your only competitor or almost only competitor, I should say, ACV, which grew 55%, and you grew 65% in the second quarter and -- we're going to have to wait and see what ACV did after the close today. But could you comment on the drivers of growth having previously been slower in this business, including slower than competition and reasonably faster and faster than the competition? And maybe update us on the progress of the migration over to the Backlot platform and the benefit of having integrated the TradeRev Backlot sales force with the, I think, much larger, I would imagine, ADESA sales force? And what do you think that means for growth going forward?
Peter Kelly
executiveThanks, Ryan. I appreciate that. First of all, we are pleased with the growth and the numbers you quoted there that match ours. So pleased with that. I would say that when we look at the year-over-year comps, we need to be mindful that the first 2 quarters of last year were both impacted in different ways by COVID. COVID sort of hit right where the 2 quarters came together. So we have that to sort of keep in mind as we think about those percentages, both for us and our competition. Just to be clear. But even with that, clearly, there's a strong underlying growth rate for this type of business and customers are adopting these. So in addition to the volumes you talked about, we're seeing record adoption both on the seller side and on the buyer side of these marketplaces. So we're very pleased about that. One big catalyst, which you mentioned was the acquisition of BacklotCars. Although, again, I should say the numbers we're talking about are organic as if we had owned BacklotCars a year ago, obviously we factored that in to the growth rate. But I think just having a more, I'd say, a better platform for U.S. customers, simpler platform and easier-to-use platform for the U.S. customers, I think, has been part of that, having greater scale, the combination of Backlot and TradeRev in the U.S. created greater scale and these marketplaces to have network effects, right? And then our go-to-market. You talked about our combined sales team, and it is a combined sales team, in both U.S. and Canada. But the focus of that sales team is very much on growing the digital channel because we see -- ultimately, we think these vehicles will tend to sell more and more on those channels in the future. So we've been very focused on that. I'm pleased with the results. And obviously looking to continue to drive that growth and we've talked publicly in the past about our goal to get to 1 million cars sold on those digital platforms. We're about halfway there. If you look at our Q2 numbers and annualize it, we're about at the halfway point. So I'm very pleased with that. And I think the opportunity is very much consistent with what we've talked about it being all along.
Ryan Brinkman
analystNo. I've heard you say that you feel that you are maybe a more natural owner of this business, the digital dealer-to-dealer business. Can you talk about what it is you think that makes you a natural owner of this business? What other parts of the overall KAR global business such as CarsArrive or AFC do you think helped to enhance your offering here?
Peter Kelly
executiveYes. Well, clearly, I think in these digital marketplaces, some of those services are important, irrespective of the car selling digitally or at a physical auction, logistics is one. We see very high transport attach rates for vehicle selling on both BacklotCars and on TradeRev in Canada. So helping constitute dealers or customers solve the equation of how do I get that car to my dealership quickly and reliably and at a good price. So we've got advantages there. Floorplan financing, you mentioned AFC. A lot of buyers, at least generally like to finance a good portion of their vehicles. That's probably a little bit less these days, but I think buyers feel a little more cash-rich, but our AFC business is performing very, very well in spite of that. But I think floorplan financing is a key tie-in to these marketplaces. I'd also say the physical assets are a tie-in as well. And one thing we know is that these digital marketplaces while they have high conversion, it's not 100% conversion. So the dealers are rarely selling all of their cars through this channel. And then the question is, what do I do with the other vehicles. So there's a chance to sort of sweep those vehicles to our closest physical lot and sell it from there. That's a value-add to dealers, particularly in markets where dense urban markets, et cetera, where space may be at a premium. And then I'd say sort of hub-and-spoke logistics. One of the really interesting thing about these -- transactions on these digital marketplaces is that vehicles are traveling over longer distances because we're connecting buyers and sellers together in a more efficient way than ever before. So the buyer is not buying the car that happens to be at their local auction, but they're buying a car that they really want even if it's further away. But that creates a fairly complicated, again, back to logistics, but we're sort of figuring out that our real estate is a value there, too, where you can sort of pull vehicles in -- after they've sold, pull them into a facility and then do more concentrated shipment and distribution and then reallocate them out again, once they get closer to their destination. So there are all those advantages that I think mean we're very focused on this business. And this is a business we believe we have a right. I don't really like the word right to win, but we are going to be very focused on winning in this market space.
Ryan Brinkman
analystThat's helpful. And next, I want to talk about just a general transition away from physical auctions when it comes to dealer consignment toward digital auctions that is the digital dealer-to-dealer I'm talking about. And I think there's this perception that because you have both physical and digital, that you may not benefit from this trend sort of taking out of one pocket and into the other. Maybe walk us through because maybe people don't realize how low your market share is in the physical dealer consignment rates. It's really Manheim that specializes in dealer consignment period. And then how high your market share is in the digital dealer-to-dealer. But my accounts just look at the 1Q numbers, if you kind of annualize your and -- you clearly have somewhere north of 40% and digital dealer-to-dealer that's been growing, and you might have 20% or so, I'm not sure in the physical dealer and what happens to your overall volumes as the industry makes this transition even if you were to just sort of maintain the relative market shares that you do have?
Peter Kelly
executiveYes. Good question, Ryan. You packed a lot in there, but let me attempt to sort of answer it. First is, we believe that digital label is a bigger addressable market for dealer-to-dealer transactions. And the data sources we look at, we look at things like Backlot, we look at some data that our competitors have all published. But historically, there's been about 5 million dealer cars selling at auction. And it's estimated anything from 5 million to 8 million dealer cars that sell outside of auction and historically wasn't really an addressable market for us because those cars were never coming into our auction properties. So we think there is a larger addressable market, okay? And I think the data is supporting that as we see these trend lines take place in our industry. The second thing is what is the relative market share. You're right. In the U.S., we had about 20% of the physical dealer-to-dealer market, okay, at ADESA historically. We believe we can take a bigger share in the more digital dealer channel market of the future. So a bigger share in a bigger addressable market is kind of how we're looking at it. And I think, as I said, we're seeing some evidence of that. I -- the market is more developed and more mature in Canada. And frankly, we are a bigger player in Canada. We have more than -- more share, both physically and digitally in Canada than we would typically have in the U.S. What we're seeing in Canada is with the digital market, we're absolutely growing our total volume. Our dealer cars sold. Yes, there's been a bit of a decline on ADESA, but that has been more than offset by the growth in the digital channel. And in aggregate, it's growing and has been growing for, I would say, a year or more now. And I think we're starting to see some evidence of that in the U.S. as well from an industry perspective, where physical volumes of dealer cars seem to be quite stable or in line with history. But on top of that, you've got a much bigger digital volume than ever was the case before. So in aggregate, the combined physical and digital is larger. So more market share in a bigger market is how we would see it, to put it simply.
Ryan Brinkman
analystOkay. Thanks. And I promise I'm not going to -- this is maybe the last time I referenced ACV in this conversation, but it's just obvious being a research analyst, looking at comparative enterprise values of these 2 companies that -- and given that you're at least a very credible competitor to them in the digital dealer-to-dealer market, it just doesn't seem that the profit pool within that market and your relative position compared to them that can't be the whole story of what their market cap is about. Having been quite a bit -- even greater than 2x yours at some point. I mean clearly, there must be some reflection in their cap that they're going to disintermediate other aspects of your business, maybe the commercial consignor business, the OPENLANE business, for example. And maybe that's pressuring on your cap too, it must be the case. So if -- could you respond to that? I mean, what do you think the relative ability for them to penetrate that separate market? And I think there's a perception that your commercial business is also this physical business that's right for disintermediation. When, in fact, you are the online digital commercial consignor, are you not?
Peter Kelly
executiveYes. So I guess, listen, I won't really comment on the respective valuations of the companies. I think that's ultimately we'll tell our story and get our story out there and investors will value the business. But I guess if I do look at it through the lens that you're talking about, first of all, I would agree our digital dealer-to-dealer business is of a very comparable scale to theirs, okay? If you look at our quarterly numbers versus theirs, very similar unit economics. And we're essentially that business as we're executing today is at or very, very close to breakeven overall, okay? In addition to that, we have obviously our physical business, and we have OPENLANE. So let me talk about OPENLANE for a moment. We have the leading share in that business, and it's really an off-lease business, where the seller is an OEM or a captive finance company, and the buyer base is typically the franchise dealer network, okay? So we've got a lot of experience there. We've got a leading share there. The unit economics in that business are less, okay? The revenue per unit is considerably lower in that than it is in Backlot/TradeRev/ACV, all right. But at scale, it can still be a good business, a relatively high-margin business. I feel good about the position we have. I feel good about the customer relationships we have and the service we're providing. And I think our customers are generally very happy with what we're doing. That's not to say I take any competition for granted. I never do. We've been facing competition in that business for 20 years. I would say aggressive competition from our principal competitor in this industry. We've done a very good job defending that and I intend to defend that against any competition that comes. And I don't really see what unique advantage ACV is going to bring to those customers. Frankly, they're already selling 60%, 70%, 80% of the vehicles through that channel, right, our customers at very low price to that customer. They're very pleased with those services. So I'm not sure how ACV is going to create this sort of super more compelling offering that's going to be enough to get a customer to shift. And then if I look at the commercial vehicle selling from our physical locations, repossessed vehicles, rental cars, some off-lease vehicles. One of the key questions any channel has to address there is where is the car going to sit? Again, I ran a digital-only business for more than a decade dealing with commercial sellers. You have to have a solution for where the car sits. When it's an off-lease car, we figured out a solution the car sits at a dealer for a period of time, we can sell it on openly. But if it's a repossessed vehicle or a rental car vehicle, the answer is not nearly as obvious. And you've got to come up with a solution for that seller. And then that begs the question, well, what about recondition? What about detail? What about those services that those customers want? And frankly, all of that is available at our physical auctions. And that's why commercial vehicle volumes at physical auctions in this industry have been as sticky as they have been for decades. I don't think that changes overnight because ACV says they've got a better quality app. I just don't think -- I don't think it works...
Ryan Brinkman
analystAnd what are the switching costs necessarily? I mean, to what extent are you embedded in the enterprise resource planning or accounting systems, management information systems of these commercial consignors? To what extent are the dealers trained in one system or the other? And I think you've just lost one, is that right over all the time? Is a Volkswagen and that wasn't so long ago when it was to Manheim. And what has been the experience of that customer having made that switch? Do you know?
Peter Kelly
executiveI don't want to comment too much on any one customer, but I would say, Ryan, we are deeply integrated with most of the customers, and that's a conscious decision. It's also somewhat a necessity in this business to do it economically at the scale that I talked -- at the economics I talked about. You have to be highly automated and have the efficient and that requires deep integrations into all those systems you talk about. So the switching costs are high. But I never want to rely on switching costs. I want to rely on good quality of service delivered, okay? Let's just say the customer you mentioned, I'm confident that, that customer runs RFPs every number of years, and I'm confident we'll be in the mix to submit our response when that business comes up for review would be my expectation. I can also tell you, we just launched, I mean, a relatively small brand. We just launched a brand in Canada this month. So we continue to win business in that category and have very, very few losses.
Ryan Brinkman
analystAnd as I was attempting to decide in my own mind, the degree to which you're likely to be effective in the online digital dealer-to-dealer space. I thought to -- look, are there other examples throughout KAR Global and your history of your having invested in and operated various different nimble asset-light, high margin, high tech, businesses, and I came across a few including CarsArrive, Autoniq, Recovery Database Network, Clearplan, Auction Frontier, CarsOnTheWeb, of course, OPENLANE. And I think a lot of us are familiar with OPENLANE some extent, CarsOnTheWeb. But maybe some of these other names that investors are hearing for the first time, do they bear -- you're taking a moment to explain -- what is special or attractive about them?
Peter Kelly
executiveYes, sure. Thanks, Ryan. And I know I've talked also about simplifying our business, and one of the simplifications I'd like to bring is to give you less brands to speak about at some point here. But we have a lot of experience running asset-light digital platforms. So if I could speak to a couple of those OPENLANE, obviously, the one everybody talks about. CarsArrive is an asset-light logistics platform for the movement of used vehicles around our industry. We do that at scale. We -- that business has been very profitable for us. And we've got a lot of experience there. Recovery -- RDN, Recovery Database Network, it's the leading platform for -- it's a SaaS platform for automotive finance companies and repossession agents. They use it as a platform to communicate the workflow around repossessing vehicles across this industry. I believe 80% or more of all repossessed vehicles in North America are processed through RDN. Very, very high margin, incredibly sticky and continues to grow. I just wish it was a bigger market for us because it's an incredible business. It just doesn't happen to be a huge business. And Autoniq is a digital platform, again, very sticky, a very cost-effective and easy-to-use vehicle valuation tool for dealers. Typically, independent dealers play a small monthly subscription and they can just scan it in or they can look at auction run list and see what is -- what are the various guidebooks telling me this vehicle is worth. So I think a lot of experience there. We've been able to grow those businesses. And I think we've managed to increase the sort of digital DNA and talent of this company over time as well. So I feel good about our ability to continue to execute those types of businesses going forward.
Ryan Brinkman
analystGreat. So many different things happened in your industry and your business itself saw so many changes during the pandemic and throughout 2020. And while there was so much focus on the digital dealer-to-dealer business. Really, the core business changed so much by the digitalizing of all the auctions, right? Those are very profound change. Maybe we were headed in that direction anyway. I'm not sure, but they say, what do they say, that "Necessity is the mother of invention," right? You have to move real quick, and this was an ability to affect that. And one consequence of it was that you posted substantially stronger margin, particularly at the level of revenue or units that you had. And there was a lot of discussion about the degree to which these savings are structural or sustainable and the degree to which the industry may go back to running cars down the lane. And I think the response has sort of been for a couple of quarters that, well, the mom-and-pops are doing it and -- but Manheim's not, and then I was going, well, Manheim is looking at it, but they don't really want to do it. They're more on our side. And now I just got a question from an investor here. And I've heard this in a couple of other places, Black Book talking about how maybe you're piloting some in-lane auctions at 11 different locations. So the question that I guess the investors would have is -- why are you doing it? Does it mean that some of the margin gains may have to be given up? Or if you don't give up the margin gains then somehow you lose share. What's the right way to think about this pilot program that you're working on?
Peter Kelly
executiveSo let me comment first on some of the cost side as you mentioned. I would say, yes, we have -- so we have reduced costs substantially. That is true. I think most of those cost actions will be permanent in nature. I think not running cars has been one aspect of that, but has not been certainly not been all of it. I don't think it's even been most of it. It's been a part of it, okay? So I think there's a lot of cost just of doing things differently in the way we process cars, that we manage our call centers, there were management layers, across the business, we've been very, very focused. So I don't think -- I think running cars has been one element of many elements to get us to that situation. And I'd also say that I don't think we're done. There's still a lot of opportunity to further reengineer the way we do stuff at this company, consolidate activity -- centralize activity, more -- digitize activities more and reduce costs. So that's going to be a continued focus, okay? Listen, on the running cars, I'm very focused on getting to a digital marketplace model for the business. I think that's the right model. Digital marketplace is underscored by physical infrastructure, because I think you need physical infrastructure to process detailed reconditioned vehicles and that's an important part, particularly if you want to serve commercial customers, which is what 70% of our business historically has been. I think it's also fair to say, Ryan, through our decision to not run cars physically, we lost dealer cars, and that's evident in our numbers. We gained dealer cars in digital. We also lost significant volumes in our lanes and they went, I would say, typically to independent auctions and maybe some to Manheim. So there is a strong constituency out there of dealers that still would like to see cars around the traditional way, okay? And there's also some commercial sellers who particularly have older rougher cars. So older repossessed vehicle portfolios who also have expressed a preference for that, particularly in light of the economy sort of reopening, et cetera. So in light of all of that, I basically made a decision, we would run a pilot at these 11 sites. And we would see what the data tells us. And I think the data I'm going to test it on 2 dimensions. One is, does it create any additional customer benefit in terms of price attainment or conversion rate or those types of metrics. I'm not sure it does, but we will see. And the second thing is, does it enable us to sort of gain some share back, particularly in the channel where we know we've lost some share. I'd say that's in dealer on-premise [itself]. And I'd also say, when I think about this pilot, and this is not really stated as much in some of our communications, but it really is a pilot. In those markets, we're actually going in even more aggressively with the digital model with BacklotCars into those markets. So can we create a really compelling offering to that dealer to say, "Hey, we want to leave with digital, car sales are first, but for the 30% or 40% cars that don't sell, we can sneak into our auction and get them sold, and that's something no other provider can do." So that's what we're going to do, and we'll see how it plays. And I think I want to be driven by the data. I have a preference. Preference is fully digital, can't get there soon enough. I think that's the model for the future. But I also recognize that in business, you have to be mindful of how quickly your customers can move and all that sort of stuff. So I want to be mindful about that too.
Ryan Brinkman
analystGreat. And the next thing I'd like you to do is sort of take us bucket by bucket through those sources of vehicles entering the whole car auctions, dealer consignment. I think it's easiest for us to track on the outside because it's correlated with SAAR. But there are some thoughts that maybe with companies like Carvana and others comprising a larger portion of the market buying more vehicles from consumers without the intention to wholesale them. I don't know if there's some structural pressures there. I mean, I -- just predominantly going to move in line with SAAR. But -- and then these other buckets that are seeing the most impact from like used car prices, like the off-lease, you've talked extensively about that, but also the repossession volumes. Love to understand like we had a meeting with Chase Auto Finance earlier today, and they were just saying that people aren't repossessed. I mean, obviously, there's all the stimulus payments and everything. But also if people have so much equity in their vehicles, instead of defaulting, they could just sell it or they're less inclined to default since there is equity, et cetera. So I know used car prices have moderated a little bit here in the last 6 weeks as per Manheim, but what is the outlook for off-lease and repossession volume given the cycle? And then maybe some of the comments, too, on dealer consignment if there's anything structural to think about.
Peter Kelly
executiveYes. I think with dealer consignment, you're right, Ryan, it does correlate to SAAR. SAAR has been a little bit of pressure here, May, June, July, and production needs to come back up. But dealer consignment volumes have been the closest to normal, let's say, in our industry, if we look at year-to-date. And there's probably some secular, but the relative market shares of those businesses are still relatively very small. And by the way, a lot of what those customers are those entities, Carvana, CarMax, et cetera, purchase reenters the wholesale market as well. They don't turn around to retail all those cars, they actually sell a lot back into the wholesale market. So I'll leave dealer consignment there. If we go into repossession, you're right, stimulus, high-used vehicle values, repossession volumes are about 35% below normal right now and have been for an extended period. I think that they return to normal over time. It is my expectation. But I think it's going to take some time for that to happen. I think ultimately, stimulus payments go away, the rental protections, et cetera, go away and things get back closer to normal. On the off-lease side, again, it's the same thing, consumers having more equity in their vehicles. So not returning the car, not being motivated to return it. Or if they do, the franchise dealer to whom they return it, just turns around and buys the car before it reenters deeper into their market process. So I think what needs to happen there is new vehicle production needs to get back closer to normal, right? Now in terms of what is the data showing. You mentioned Manheim. I also looked at Black Book. They put out a weekly report. I think we're now in sort of week 6 or 7 of used vehicle values declining. And the other thing I noticed that this year is the rate of decline per week is running roughly double what it was between 2017 and 2019. So candidly, I take that as a positive that cars are sort of readjusting from these historically high prices that we saw in sort of late May and early June. But it is going to take some time for that to get back towards normal, Ryan. And I'm not expecting to be back towards back abnormal in the current -- in 2021. It's going to take longer than that, I believe.
Ryan Brinkman
analystOkay. And maybe, Eric, any thoughts on capital allocation and buybacks sort of mop up some of that pipe dilution? Or just generally what the priorities for allocation of free cash flow is likely to look like going forward? I don't know if there's anything from a tech perspective, still on the acquisition side? I don't know if there's any smaller players out there on the digital dealer-to-dealer side? Or just where you would focus M&A dollars? And how much goes to M&A versus how much to buyback versus deleverage or whatnot, what do you think?
Eric Loughmiller
executiveSo Ryan, in the first half of the year, we bought back just over $180 million of stock at an average price below the conversion price for the pipe. And our focus there was to offset future dilution, and we're on that path. In terms of looking at the rest of the year, our priority would be to support our strategic initiatives. If there's anything that could accelerate our growth in the digital marketplaces that would receive highest priority. We would then look at other -- we're constantly investing internally. We have adequate resources to support the platforms that already exist. And then we'll look at the opportunity whether there's still sufficient funds to return additional capital to shareholders at an attractive price. So we will -- I'm kind of like telling you what you always hear from me. It's a balanced approach. We look at all the opportunities. We are generating substantial cash in the first half of the year, and that will continue. So it's not as if the capital I've got today, I've got to figure out what to do. There will be more. So we're proactively looking at all of the options. And Peter has been very supportive of us early in the year buying back stock and hopefully, ideally continuing to invest in the growth of the business along the way as the stock appreciate some value and seeing these's better alternatives. Long term, I do have a 2025 maturity of some bonds to think about. I'm not saving for that yet. But over the long term, we have other things that we'll decide what's the right structure and will capital be deployed at some point to reduce debt. That will not be the focus in the near term -- near-to-medium term, no.
Ryan Brinkman
analystOkay. What about some of these investments that you've made in other companies and auto technology companies and whatnot. Curious if you want to comment on any of them to the extent to which you consider any of those investments to be core or not? I know it's led to some volatility in your adjusted EBITDA just on the unrealized gains quarter-to-quarter. Not that I think that, that's really important, but the extent to which maybe you would convert some of those unrealized gains to realized gains. And then how that might impact capital allocation going forward as you raise additional cash from having done that? When you do that?
Eric Loughmiller
executiveFirst, Ryan, just to quickly clarify. Unrealized gains are excluded from adjusted EBITDA, but they are included in operating adjusted net income per share. So that isn't -- the volatility is on net income per share. The realized gains, I mean, listen, the only investments we've made have been with an eye towards supporting our strategy. And in doing so, the market has been such that some of those companies have gone public, I would say somewhat unexpectedly based upon their stage of development, but that's the market we're in today. We continue to look at opportunities where an important relationship, primarily a customer and would allow us with an investment to support their strategy as well as enhance our relationship as it relates to our strategy. So we don't do a lot of these. They tend to be small. Investments are typically $5 million or less each. And we would -- I would actually look forward to some opportunities because currently, my batting average -- as a company, the batting average is quite good, and we've created capital that we have to redeploy if its opportunities arise. But again, they're all strategic relationships not -- we do not consider ourselves an investment fund looking just for return. I probably would support that, that's a good strategy for everybody, if you can invest for and get a return is usually because you add some value to the relationship beyond your money.
Ryan Brinkman
analystOkay. Maybe just a last question is about to the extent that volume does transfer from physical locations to online selling platforms to some extent and the physical yards are less well utilized to some extent. I think there has been some contemplation of maybe repurposing portions of some of the facilities to accomplish other tasks, refurbishing vehicles for something other than auctioning in your yards or assisting various different fleet companies. What's the latest thought on that potential?
Peter Kelly
executiveYes. Thanks, Ryan. I'll take that one. We try to think of it less through a lens of an auction. An auction was a certain operation in a certain facility in the past. We kind of think of it as a vehicle logistics center with a digital auction running on top. That's the model we ultimately are trying to get towards. The footprint may end up being a little different. We've got to figure that out to see how volumes return and see what that need is. I can tell you that right now, an area we're seeing a lot of demand for is to get vehicles into a fully retail-ready state. We call it retail reconditioning. So in the past, we've been able to get many hundreds of thousands of vehicles a year, millions, perhaps some years into what I'll call wholesale reconditioning, which is -- they look good. They're clean. They look almost retail ready, but they're not retail ready. The dealer then buys that car has to do more work to the vehicle for their retail there. So retail reconditioning is getting it all the way where it could be delivered directly to a customer. We're seeing a lot of demand for that. We just -- it just seems to grow every month. It's from some of the players you might imagine, some of the names you've mentioned some of them already. They're good customers of ours. We can do that well, we can do it profitably. The other thing we find is when we're doing that business, it increases that customer's desire to source through us because that eliminates transportation legs, okay? And it also increases the likelihood that they'll bring a trade-in back to our facility because if they're dropping a car off a retail customer, then maybe the trade in coming back as well. So it hits lots of different sort of revenue points within our business, let's just say that. So we're excited about that and expecting that to continue to grow.
Ryan Brinkman
analystVery helpful. Kind of little bit over. I appreciate all your time and the insights that you shared today. We appreciate it.
Peter Kelly
executiveRyan, thank you very much, and delighted to be here. Thank you. Thank you for that.
Ryan Brinkman
analystThank you.
Eric Loughmiller
executiveThank you, Ryan.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete OPENLANE, Inc. transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to OPENLANE, Inc. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.