Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

November 18, 2020

New York Stock Exchange US Industrials Professional Services conference_presentation 31 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Aleksandr Zukin

analyst
#1

Welcome, everybody. My name is Alex Zukin. I cover enterprise software here at RBC. I am privileged to be joined by the Paycom team with Chad, Craig, and James Samford. Guys, thanks for joining us and being here with us today.

Chad Richison

executive
#2

Thank you.

Craig Boelte

executive
#3

Thank you.

Aleksandr Zukin

analyst
#4

Chad, so the first question for you will be on a topic that you have a love-and-hate relationship with recently, and that's the topic of bookings. But what I'll ask is we know you want to -- I get that you want to get away from giving a lot of disclosures around bookings. But if you'll indulge me in this question, it's where have you seen the strongest bounce back in bookings over the course of pandemic? And where would you say they lagged?

Chad Richison

executive
#5

Yes. I mean what I said was prior, I think it was our May announcement, it was either end of April or the beginning of May that our bookings had gotten back to a pre-pandemic level. And that was prior to the pandemic, we were having a lot of success. And at that time I said with the exception of a few weeks in there where we pulled back and then as we were kind of getting our feet back underneath us, we had gotten back to the pre-pandemic level. Since then, I've said that that has accelerated. The bookings have accelerated. Not just got back to the pre-pandemic level, but they've accelerated. And so I have talked about that. And your question of where are we seeing it, it's been from the usual suspects. I can't say it's been any different as far as the mix of what we're seeing versus industry, competitor and what have you. And then as far as where we're lagging, there again there are industries that are hurting right now, but we're still selling in those industries. So we remain industry-agnostic, even though obviously there's industries that are more impacted than others. Our approach to sales is the same in that we're looking to sell all industries.

Aleksandr Zukin

analyst
#6

Makes sense, and just to clarify because I get this question a lot. When you talk about bookings getting back to pre-pandemic levels when you talk to accelerating, is that to say if you had sold $10 of bookings pre-pandemic, when you say I got -- we got back to the pre-pandemic levels, that means you got back to selling $10 of bookings in Q1 or Q2? When you say accelerate, that means that whatever the growth rate was before, your growth rate on that is now higher?

Chad Richison

executive
#7

Yes. So when we said accelerated, I said the weekly average that we were selling, that both we got back to the same weekly average. So in your example of $10, we would have gotten back to the $10. And then when I said accelerated from beyond that, obviously that would have been more than $10. Again as a weekly average, which you add all that together, that does make for a larger year as well.

Aleksandr Zukin

analyst
#8

Got it. And so then let's talk about kind of walk us -- remind us on the journey of kind of what were the kind of impacts from the pandemic on the company, on bookings, on employment growth. Where are we today? And what does a vaccine world look like for Paycom? Is that a snapback? Is that a gradual resumption? Take us through the journey.

Chad Richison

executive
#9

Yes. So I mean, well where we're at on the pandemic is what we talked about. The negative side of the way the pandemic has impacted us from a revenue perspective was that $1.95 million to $2 million in weekly headwinds that we have due to current clients' reduction in their employee base that we charge for. We did talk about on the last earnings call that to the extent we did see some improvement in that, it was around maybe $100,000 a week depending on what week you measured it. And so haven't seen a lot of improvement in that. But that was -- and then obviously we also -- which I don't know that was necessarily pandemic related. But we did have the decrease in interest rates at the end of March, which hit us another 150 basis points. So it was $350,000 a week there. Now that's the negative way that the pandemic has impacted us. On the positive way, there's we've become more efficient in this, as I think most businesses gained efficiencies going through this. Not just in the expenses that you don't have because you're not opening up your cafeteria in your building, but also all the efficiencies that are gained by using better technology whether it be through communication, reporting or otherwise. And so we've also gained some efficiencies there. You translate that over into the sales process. Additional efficiencies we've gained there has really been in the selling motion again. And it's helping us improve the selling skills of our salespeople. Before, a sales manager, on a good week, was able to go on 6 appointments with a salesperson. Because you had to ride around, you had to be with them, you had to go on buildings. Now they can go on 12. Our best salespeople, on a good week, can go on 6 appointments. Now they can go on 12. So there's some positive benefits that are also coming from the current environment. Now in answer to what happens in a snapback, I mean if things snap back to normal and we have restaurants that are going from doing takeout only to actually having people come and sit in a restaurant, they will probably need more employees to handle that. Same with hotels and hospitality, health clubs and what have you. So I do think that as it comes back, it will impact us. I don't know about a snapback. That will kind of depend on does the vaccine produce a snapback? We'll have to wait and see what happens there. But I don't think we have to have improvement to grow. We need stabilization, we've seen that. And I don't think we need improvement in the overall employment. The way employment looks right now, I don't think we need improvement in that for us to be able to grow. The employment environment can stay substantially the same, and we can still continue to grow.

Aleksandr Zukin

analyst
#10

Chad, let me ask this question. It's a question I get a lot, and to the extent that you've talked about it either earlier on in the pandemic or even before. When you look at your customer base, what percentage of your customer base is in the most exposed industries, travel, retail, restaurant hospitality? What percentage of your overall employee count or customer count or both is generally exposed to those sectors?

Chad Richison

executive
#11

I mean I wouldn't say it would be any different than the percentage that those businesses make up of the mid-market workforce. And I don't know the specific answer to that, but I mean we wouldn't be over-concentrated in these areas. And I wouldn't expect we would be-under concentrated in those areas either.

Aleksandr Zukin

analyst
#12

Okay. So then I guess one of the questions that I also got, particularly after the last quarter, not just to your report but also on one of your competitors', was you saw -- if we saw initial employment trends change by 5% and we saw some sequential differential for you guys, about 1%, benefiting from the changes in employment, why was there such a big -- why was there not more of a benefit in your employment base, based on what you saw from some of the macro indicators and some of the [ ADPs and Paychex? ]

Chad Richison

executive
#13

Yes. I mean well, I think ours was very similar to what everybody else did. I mean ADP, I think, had a 10.5-point headwind on their pays per control. Now they have a 9.2 headwind on their pays per control. So they had a little bit of improvement from what I saw. As far as the others, I think we were all similar. Important to note, if an employee leaves one of our clients, there's 100% chance we're going to lose that revenue. But there's only a 5% chance we'll get it back because we only have 5% of the market. So if an employee leaves a restaurant, if they don't go back to that restaurant if the employee is like, "Well, I'm no longer going to be a waiter right now. I'm going to go work in retail," or something like that, unless that employee went to somebody that we were working with, we're not going to receive the benefit of that. So it could be that. But when I heard what everybody said, it seemed like we were all pretty much talking the same language. Maybe ADP did have a little bit improvement from what they mentioned, more so than some of the others. But I'm just not 100% sure that we weren't all very similar.

Aleksandr Zukin

analyst
#14

Got it. And I guess because then the question becomes as employment trends potentially improve, do you get that back? Is that -- is employment a tailwind, hopefully since we've troughed? And how quickly does that tailwind accrue to the business? And how should we kind of think about that over the next 6 to 12 months?

Chad Richison

executive
#15

Yes. If there's a catalyst, yes. I mean I would say that if the pandemic's over and people are going back to restaurants, going back to football games, going back to hotels, then absolutely we can't help but benefit from that because we still have the client. We still have the restaurant that had 180 employees and now has 14. We still have the hotels. We still have the business. So we can't help from (sic) benefit. But if unemployment gets incrementally better, unless it gets incrementally better at our client base, it won't necessarily have the impact. Which is why we went ahead and separated out us from the unemployment trends, by giving you the exact dollar amount we're being impacted on a weekly basis. We did call out very small improvement on that. Not meaningful, but I do believe it more than proved out a stabilization in the number for now. And that's what we're dependent upon. If we have stabilization, we can outgrow the negative impact that's been created for us. And you're right. If things get better in next year and there is some type of catalyst? Absolutely, that's going to help us. But I'm not so sure that incremental impacts on the unemployment survey method, which is our most accurate method of surveying unemployment, I'm not 100% sure that, that will directly transfer into mitigating our headwinds as it relates to those revenue amounts.

Aleksandr Zukin

analyst
#16

That makes sense. So maybe what are you seeing when you talk to your customers, when you survey your customers? What are the employment trends that you're seeing? How have they been looking over the last, call it I don't know, month or 2 months versus 6 months ago? And how do you -- when you start thinking about what that could mean, are people just generally kind of paused that some net new normal until we get through by the end of the year, we see where a vaccine is and then we reevaluate? Like does it come in waves? Or is there some other seasonal component that we should be aware of?

Chad Richison

executive
#17

Yes. I mean the leading indicators we're going to be looking at are people who are onboarding employees back, either into their work -- into their current client or clients that might be growing, or clients that are onboarding employees that are just backfill. So you look at that. You look at background checks. Then you start looking at punch in, punch out. So there are some leading indicators. The way I would best describe the environment is survival. I think that's what most businesses have been in, a survival mode. And obviously businesses are also trying to thrive through this. But I think when you're looking at those businesses that have been negatively impacted, I would still say they're in survival mode, those industries. There are some industries that have been positively impacted by this as well. Logistics, some health care, on the margin, there are some other industries that have been impacted positively. But I think when you look at the impact on those that have been impacted negatively and what's going on with them, I still think there's an attitude of survival that people are in right now and kind of in a waiting situation. Which does seem to be more positive, but until consumer confidence returns, I don't think you'll see those restaurants bringing back those employees, or hotels or others. That's really what we're waiting on, is the improvement in consumer confidence.

Aleksandr Zukin

analyst
#18

And I guess the -- what is the impact of the potential effects of stimulus and all this? And kind of walk us through if it happens, how long would it take until it impacted your business positively?

Chad Richison

executive
#19

That's hard. There again it depends on how they do the stimulus. I mean if they do the stimulus the way they did last time and they send money to people sitting at home, I don't know. On some levels especially on small business, the PPP helped the businesses stay alive. Now did it help them stay alive past September? I'm not so sure. But I do think that there was some opportunity there, specifically with PPP and impact on business. If they do a stimulus and it's about creating quality jobs to where you get tax benefit, or you get reimbursed based off of creating a quality job at a certain salary and what have you, then I think there'll be some benefits if it's truly a stimulus. So it's just going to depend. But I do think that the last stimulus did help a lot of companies, especially on the smaller end. I wouldn't say mid-market was incredibly impacted. But on the smaller end, I do think it was the difference in many companies going under or being able to survive.

Aleksandr Zukin

analyst
#20

And so when you -- back to our favorite topic of bookings. When you think about the tailwinds and what kind of growth you're kind of architecting for, if I think about on one hand, you've got twice as efficient sales organization. On the other hand, you've got a buyer that -- well, maybe tell us, right? Is the priority to switch the same, less, higher? Is the sales cycle, same, less, more? Is the budget environment same, less, more? Walk us through those puts and takes and kind of how that constitutes into what kind of -- assuming that there, it takes time to get back to some level of normalcy, what kind of growth, once we lap the COVID impact in that period, what kind of growth are you architecting for?

Chad Richison

executive
#21

Yes well, I mean I believe our value proposition is becoming more mainstream. I mean I don't think 5 years from now, HR is going to be and operating will be -- or payroll will be inputting data points from e-mails and other. I do think you're going to have more and more employees have a direct relationship with that database because that's how the business wins. So I think you'll continue to see us drive that. You're going to see more and more around the self-service in the future. I think people will be doing their own payroll as individuals. I think when pay period ends, payroll will be done. You won't have all this collection and processing after the fact. And so as long as we stay focused on continuing to drive true efficiencies for our clients and ROI, I don't see why we couldn't take the 5% of the market that we have approximately and continue to expand on that. We continue to get more and more leads. I mean we get leads both of our -- both from our advertising. And then we had a lot of leads just from employees that go from one business to another where they were used to having a single experience, and now they have multiple systems, e-mails and everything else. And so I think that our value proposition is going to become more and more prevalent as we continue to drive value for our clients.

Aleksandr Zukin

analyst
#22

And what about the selling environment? I mean I get the leads. But is it easier to sell, harder to sell as the cloud transition accelerated in this category? Or it will, once people actually have money to spend -- like what -- in real time if you look at your kind of business and the conversations that your salespeople are having, is it on -- net-net, is it a little bit harder to sell? Or is it easier to sell?

Chad Richison

executive
#23

Easier. It's easier right now just because of the method through which we're going through to sell. Before, maybe we had to meet with one department then the next department, the next department. Now you're really able to meet with everybody at once, as we're doing right now. So there are technologies. Maybe these same technologies will be utilized to sell in our industry after this. Maybe we'll be going back up face to face. We'll have to see. I think the prospects will dictate that, not us. But right now in the environment we are in right now, we are able to be a lot more efficient. And we are having a lot more success moving sales calls along. I would find it hard to believe that's unique to just our industry. I would like to think that most B2B sales organizations in this environment are finding efficiencies in their own sales process. And we're just one of those, I would think.

Aleksandr Zukin

analyst
#24

Makes sense. I guess maybe talk about the pace set of go-lives. And also, what are in your mind, like what are the biggest growth catalysts that you're looking at for 2021? And what are the biggest headwinds that you want to make sure and caution people to kind of recall or to keep in mind when they're modeling growth?

Chad Richison

executive
#25

Well, I mean for us, I think it's the acceleration of the value proposition. I mean at the point where people want employees to have that direct relationship the same way they do everywhere else, and they want to mandate that. We don't ask employees when to come to work every day, though most employees have a time. We don't -- employees ask us, "Hey, what do you want me to do?" We typically will tell an employee what task it is we want them to complete. They don't come in and just do whatever. We give employees a title. And so asking employees to use a system directly is just another step in what businesses do to drive efficiencies for themselves and produce strong ROI. So I see more and more of that happening in the future. I see us being more right than wrong as we move into the future and as more people realize that these employees, when they leave work, have direct relationships with database in their consumer lives. They're using systems to connect directly. And then they come to work and it can be 1995. And so that's really what's going to drive our success next year. And 2022 and 2023 and 2024 also, it's going to be that. As far as the things that we have to challenge us, they are the things that I would say most always challenge us. And that is continuing to get head count in here from a sales perspective, continuing to have strong R&D group, continue to have strong processes so that we can actually continue to retain our clients, and so the things we'll continue to work on to improve next year. A lot of that will be around adding people, but that's really a challenge we have every year is continuing to add good people at Paycom.

Aleksandr Zukin

analyst
#26

And then let's talk about margins. I mean clearly you're seeing efficiencies in the business from go-to-market efficiencies that you called out earlier. But you're also leaning in on some of the marketing and digital advertising spend. So walk us through where you're leaning in, where you're going to continue to lean in, where investors should continue to expect margin accretion and margin dilution as you make some of those investments.

Chad Richison

executive
#27

Yes. I mean I would think any impact that advertising has on our margins would be temporary. Because you would expect if advertising is working, which it is, that that spend is going to turn into revenue. And note that revenue follows the same margin profile that we've had with our other clients. So we are continuing to spend in advertising. As we look into next year, we will continue to spend in advertising next year. But also what we're finding is that the advertising is producing the revenue. And so -- and then also you can overspend in advertising. So I would say that we've got a strong spend now. To the extent it continues to work as it has, we'll continue to spend it. But I don't necessarily see it being advertising being a long-term drag on margins.

Aleksandr Zukin

analyst
#28

And do you see this...

Craig Boelte

executive
#29

Yes. We're also continuing...

Aleksandr Zukin

analyst
#30

Sorry. Go ahead.

Craig Boelte

executive
#31

We're also continuing to spend aggressively in the R&D area as well. We have an ambitious product road map as well. So that's the other area that obviously we're continuing to spend aggressively. And then in other parts of the business, we have seen some areas where we can improve margins. So we continue to look throughout the model to look for efficiencies.

Aleksandr Zukin

analyst
#32

Makes sense. I guess...

Chad Richison

executive
#33

And Alex, the more people use the software, the less we have to do to service them. The more proficient they become. Just as a reminder, the number of serviced individuals we had at the end of 2019 was the same number we had at the end of 2018, and we had grown 30%. So we were doing it with the same number of people, and that's because as employees service themselves, there's less issues with the product. And so I think as you move more and more to that, I think we'll gain other efficiencies in our model as well.

Aleksandr Zukin

analyst
#34

Perfect. And then I'll take a question from the audience here, and I encourage more if you have them. But Chad, given all the learnings and shifts as a result of COVID, what is your 5-year vision for Paycom? Where do you see this business a few years out once we cycle past COVID? Are your aspirations the same but faster or higher, or higher and faster?

Chad Richison

executive
#35

The same, they're the same. What we plan on doing for 5 -- in 5 years is the same as what our focus has been prior to the pandemic. There hasn't been any change in that. It hasn't changed our plan at all.

Aleksandr Zukin

analyst
#36

Is there anything you've been surprised about or disappointed by either within -- so positively surprised or negatively surprised in terms of what you're seeing out of the industry, what you're seeing out of the execution, what are you seeing out of the competitors in the market year-to-date and recently?

Chad Richison

executive
#37

Yes. I mean, well I would say first I was surprised we were all able to work from home. We'd never done that at Paycom. We were 0% work from home, and now we're 99%. I mean I didn't think we'd be able to answer the phones. I thought we were going to service people through e-mails. "And how are we going to do this? Everybody is sitting at their..." So there's a lot that we've learned, which honestly is going to change our disaster recovery plans as we move into this, because it can. There'll be some efficiencies gained there as well. But so I would say there's been a big surprise that -- there was a large surprise that we could sell and convert during this. Like I said, we did the wrong things for a couple of weeks. And so there's been a surprise in that. As I sit here today, there's not a lot that I'm surprised by. But early on as we were going through it, absolutely there's a lot that we learned in going through this. And I think a lot of positive things will come out of this. But at the end of the day, we could have done without it, and we would have been just fine as well. So when we look into the 5-year plan, I'm anticipating we're through all the pandemic-type thing, and we're just focused on creating value for the client. And that's what we've been focused on throughout this, which I think really set us up well for the pandemic as we had the right product for that. And I believe it will be the same when the pandemic ends.

Aleksandr Zukin

analyst
#38

Chad, this is a good question to ask you that. I mean given that you went from 0% remote to 100% remote, beyond disaster recovery, do you anticipate having either more -- a greater percentage of workers being permanently remote? Do you anticipate having a more hybridized model where you don't have to be in the office every day of the week? What's your vision for this kind of hybrid or increasing the remote world post-pandemic or as it relates to Paycom specifically?

Chad Richison

executive
#39

Well, I mean as it relates to Paycom and our intent to come back into the office, I'm not a "never and always" type person that I like to say one or the other. So I think that we've always got to look for ways to improve our business right now. I do believe that is continuing to build our culture at work when it's safe to do so. It's not safe to do so now, so obviously we wouldn't do that. But we always look at things, and we're going to do the right thing for our employees and as well as the client. But right now if we look at it, we are expecting a return back into the office and continue to build the culture as well as the business that we've built.

Aleksandr Zukin

analyst
#40

Perfect. I'll ask another investor question, and then that will probably be right, take us to the end of our time. But the final investor question is what are your win rates versus your competitors, specifically Gusto?

Chad Richison

executive
#41

Well, I don't know what our competitors' win rates are. I mean we have a lot of success from what I know about Gusto or Zenefits or Namely or whatever. They primarily focus on your small business company, so that's going to be more in our small business groups. Again, our small business group is more about answering the companies who call us and are interested in using our service. They don't really do outbound selling in a strategic head-to-head environment. But I'm sure that they have a lot of success with the companies that -- or the company that you mentioned and/or other companies that might participate more down market as well.

Aleksandr Zukin

analyst
#42

And maybe the same question around Ultimate Kronos Group, Ceridian, Paycor, Paylocity. Who do you come up against most to? Where are you seeing more ...

Chad Richison

executive
#43

Our win rates are going up in the mid-market. I mean they just are. Our win rates are going up in the mid-market. So -- and I think a lot of that has to do with our advertising, whether or not it's bringing people to the site, or whether or not it's educating them on the appropriate way to use technology, our leads are more educated now. They know why they're calling us. I think sometimes before, they call us and well, they want Paycom to tell them why they're calling, what's different, what have you. I think now we're starting to get calls where people understand the difference. And so we've got a hotter lead than what we've had in the past, which I think is helping us. As well as the selling method that we go through, like we're doing right now online, I think all that's helping us with our close rates right now.

Aleksandr Zukin

analyst
#44

Perfect. Well, we'll end it there, Chad. Thank you so much for joining us as well as Craig and James. And thank you, everybody, for tuning in.

Chad Richison

executive
#45

All right. Thank you.

James Samford

executive
#46

Thank you.

Craig Boelte

executive
#47

Thanks.

Aleksandr Zukin

analyst
#48

Thanks, guys.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Paycom Software, Inc. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Paycom Software, Inc. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.