Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

February 16, 2021

New York Stock Exchange US Industrials Electrical Equipment conference_presentation 30 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Julian Mitchell

analyst
#1

Perfect. Well, I think we're ready to begin. My name is Julian Mitchell. Thanks, everyone, for joining us for the 38th Barclays Industrial Select Conference. It's my pleasure to introduce now Blake Moret, Chairman and CEO of Rockwell Automation; and also a breaking announcement regarding Nick Gangestad, new CFO. Many of you dialed in will know Nick from his long career at 3M. So congratulations, first of all. And thanks, Nick, for making yourself available this morning. I think even 12, 13 days before your first day at Rockwell. So congratulations to both, you and Blake, and we'll look forward to working with you at Rockwell. Perhaps, Blake, first off, if you just like to open up with any prepared remarks, and then we can obviously go into the Q&A session.

Blake Moret

executive
#2

Great, Julian. Well, thank you. It's a pleasure to be here today. For those of you who may not be as familiar with the name, Rockwell is a pure-play industrial technology company, bringing the Connected Enterprise to life for customers around the world in discrete and hybrid and process industry segments. We're increasing our value by helping them become more resilient, agile and sustainable as IT and OT converge, and we're really helping to take manufacturing to a whole new level.

Julian Mitchell

analyst
#3

Thank you, Blake. And perhaps that first point around the company is more of a technology company today than it had been with its industrial roots. Maybe help us understand how satisfied you are with Rockwell's performance during this current downturn? And what sort of growth rates we should expect as you get that industrial recovery but also that technology layer perhaps driving some growth on top of that?

Blake Moret

executive
#4

Well, we've talked for really the last couple of investor days about being more resilient in -- through the cycle and also giving ourselves more ways to win, more ways to add value. And I'm happy with early signs of that resilience coming out as we looked at -- even in the depths of this most recent downturn, I think our profitability held up quite well. We still have plenty of room to run in terms of increasing our revenue resilience and increasing our annual recurring revenue, which is a big focus for us now. But early signs are that the company is responding well, employees understand the importance of it, people recognize that it's all hands on deck, it's not just sales, it's not just the products and the software that we're developing, but it's the infrastructure, IT is in the game, and some of the recent hires that we've made are going to accelerate that process. So still early going, but I'm happy with the start.

Julian Mitchell

analyst
#5

Great. And then maybe just switching to Nick for a second. Nick, clearly, it's extremely early days for you at Rockwell, but maybe give us some understanding perhaps of the decision to join, the background for that? Any extremely early impressions of the new company?

Nicholas Gangestad

executive
#6

Yes, Julian, thanks for asking that question. Yes, so I -- as you know, I retired last summer from 3M. And it was a long-term plan my wife and I had that we wanted to retire early when we could assess what do we want to do next with our life. And there are a number of things we're looking at. Late last year, this opportunity at Rockwell came up. And the more I explored it, I found the company with -- I knew well from my 3M days, but I found a company with a very exciting mission, very exciting vision. One that I've, as I learned more about it, like I could see myself becoming part of. As I talk to more and more people at Rockwell, I found people with a passion for what they're doing, and that's an exciting thing for me. And then while this company has been very successful, I found it also a company not willing to rest on its laurels, but also change to become even better and more impactful. So like, as an example, doing a lot of great things around industrial technology, but the layering on of software to make things even more simple for Rockwell's customers, like, that's an example of just a company wanting to get better and better. And I'm excited to be able to join this team and be part of this company.

Julian Mitchell

analyst
#7

Perfect. Thank you. And obviously, we'll circle back with much more rigorous questions once you've been in the job more than...

Nicholas Gangestad

executive
#8

I have no doubt of that, Julian.

Julian Mitchell

analyst
#9

We'll look forward to seeing a lot more of you, Nick. I suppose, switching back to the near-term demand environment, I think, Blake, you've mentioned product orders showing good momentum late last calendar year. Maybe help us understand, has that continued into what you've seen so far of this year? And maybe I suppose there's some cross current short-term around maybe some component shortages, hurting demand or hurting the conversion of orders into revenue, but also the flip side is perhaps looming input costs causing some advanced purchases by customers or channel partners. Maybe just any clarity around those points on the near term?

Blake Moret

executive
#10

Sure. Well, in our last earnings release, we continued with our practice through the pandemic of giving a little more visibility to orders on even a monthly basis in that -- the products part of our business because that's a leading indicator. And we showed that in November and December, in particular, we really saw a very strong uptick of orders. It contributed to the record backlog that we had at the end of our first fiscal quarter that ended in December, and that demand continued strong into the new quarter. We don't give inter-quarter guidance and so on, but we did say that the orders demand continued strong into end of January. This is -- products are around 2/3 of our business. Typically, the solutions, the engineer to order, the more people-intensive businesses, services and so on, that will tend to lag by a couple of quarters in different recessions. Each recession has had a different forcing function, if you will, but we generally see the demand for the longer cycle businesses, process systems, services and so on lagged by a couple of quarters. And I think there's indication that it's going to play out in a similar way here. We are working supply chain constraints like just about everybody in this industry to convert those orders to shipments. It's not affecting demand, but being able to convert that to shipments is, again, a hands-on process. We're working with distribution and our customers so that they understand. Our integrated supply chain folks are working to increase our own capacity as well as working with component suppliers there to make sure that we can maximize the impact there. But it's not affecting the demand from our customers at this point, and so that's positive to see and bodes well for the rest of the year.

Julian Mitchell

analyst
#11

Fantastic. And maybe looking out beyond this current fiscal year, you mentioned just now, each downturn has its different nuances or characteristics. When you think about this next upturn, very early days and everyone has their own perspective, but Rockwell has seen, I guess, 3 downturns, if you like, the last sort of 12 years, a huge -- and an upturn. You had a huge bounce in 2010, sort of reacceleration in 2014, a moderate balance in 20-sort-of '17, '18. So how are you assessing like this sort of slop and shape of the upturn, not the next 6 months, but looking medium-term, what does it feel like to you? What does it remind you of or not remind you of?

Blake Moret

executive
#12

Yes. I think taking a specific vertical by vertical approach to that assessment is probably helpful. Starting with discrete and a couple of the primary vertical industries within discrete segment, you look at automotive, and obviously, the big news is move towards electric vehicles, and we're seeing that. Some of the potential that we've been talking about for a while is turning into orders, and we have more ways to win in electric vehicles. In addition to all the traditional processes of stamping metal and painting it and the body shop and assembling things and testing the vehicle at the end of the line, all those things are still relevant in electric vehicles, but we have a much higher readiness to serve in the powertrain side because it's not so much so-called subtractive manufacturing processes, it's the assembly, our motion control, including our independent car technology, gives us a very high readiness to serve. And in addition to that, the software, the MES software for scheduling units in an electric vehicle plant, that's more of a necessary requirement in the eyes of those manufacturers today rather than a nice to have that may have been the case in traditional plans. So we see the secular trends of electric vehicles as well as our readiness to serve, attractive, and they bode well for the next few years there. Semiconductor, again, we have additional ways to win, brand moving from our traditional strengths in the building management there, and people are continuing to make everything they can smart. And so as we're seeing, the semi manufacturers are building capacity because they have to because they're at the critical path for so many industries today. Moving on to hybrid life sciences, people are going to continue to want to live longer, healthier lives. If we come into a new normal where the world is looking for 1 billion or 2 billion doses of vaccine or booster shots each year, that's a tremendous opportunity for an industry for us that we're very well-positioned to serve from our basic automation as well as the software. Food and beverage, as populations grow, people continue to want to eat. They want choices. And how that food is packaged as more people enter the middle class, then they have more choice in their diet. And food and beverage is our single biggest vertical, and I feel very good with the way we're positioned there. And then maybe finishing on the process side, oil and gas, the world is still using 90 million barrels of oil a day. What we're hearing more in the narrative is extracting that and producing it as efficiently as possible. And for sustainability reasons as well as just being able to lower the breakeven point, that's exactly where we're focused. It's not about new capacity for us, it's about more efficient production. And then mining, and as we've seen commodity prices increase, that's a good thing. It is a little bit of a headwind, of course, in terms of our internal cost, but it's outweighed by the opportunity to sell more to the copper mines as they look for more resilience in their operations, remote operations, safety, higher quality and efficiency. And those are all things that we're made to help them with.

Julian Mitchell

analyst
#13

Perfect. And within -- there's a lot of drivers out there across the different markets, customer spending as well as automation specific. When you think about Rockwell's own perspectives around market share in the short term, there's been some questions, I suppose, particularly after the last quarter, and I think it's -- everyone dialed in would agree, it's madness to extrapolate sort of market share trends and something like automation from 1 to 3 months period, but it is something we get questions around. What's your perspective on Rockwell's market shares, whether you want to talk about it sort of by segment or vertical or geographic region? Are you concerned in any way? Or you think the company is through a lot of these moves organically and inorganically, it's actually moving further ahead perhaps of the pack in some respects than it might have been 10 years ago?

Blake Moret

executive
#14

Yes. Our overall position is one of offense versus defense. I think we have tremendous opportunities to take share in a variety of geographies, industries and then in segments of our offering. When we look at the way things have played out over the last year, our strongest market where we have the highest share is unquestionably North America. North America was really last into the pandemic, and I think it's playing out where North America is last out. So whereas in our second fiscal quarter last year, we outperformed a number of our competitors, and I am expecting, particularly with the development of orders that we've seen, that we're going to see very strong performance in the second half of the year as those orders convert to shipments, and we continue to have new orders. So I look at it as primarily an issue of calendarization. We have lower shares in China, I don't think that's a surprise, and China was first in and first out. So I would look at it that way. Now that being said, we don't rest on where we are for a moment, and we continue to look for every opportunity we can to beat our competitors and to take additional share around the world. And so it's going -- you're going to see an aggressive posture from us releasing new hardware and software offerings, adding new go-to-market options in parts of the world where we have lower share to complement our traditional electrical distributors. And so that's where we're positioned, and I like that point of our evolution.

Julian Mitchell

analyst
#15

Thanks. And one sort of related aspect there, you talked about going on the offense, and acquisition is part of that, but organically as well, I think we saw it in your most recent earnings call, there is some stepped up investment in the current fiscal year. I suppose some investors might ask, because of the changes in the automation industry, IT penetration on the rise, is there a chance of that higher investment spend, each year now, it's higher and higher or no, you think this is sort of not temporary, but it's an unusual step-up in the current year in that investment spend, and so we shouldn't assume every year now we get a big step-up?

Blake Moret

executive
#16

Yes. I think you should look at this as a little bit of an unusual step-up for a couple of reasons. One, the faster than expected development of orders told us that it would be to our advantage to get this new software capability online just as soon as possible. And this speaks a little bit to your earlier question about what we see for the next few years, I see strong expansion for the next few years. And I want to get all of our weapons online just as quickly as possible to participate in that fully and to grow even faster recurring revenue because the investments that we're making this year are to pull forward some of the software development. What I -- what we are doing is working primarily with third parties to be able to take well-defined parts of that software that can be developed in the year and to be able to get those done so that they don't contribute to our ongoing run rate. So this is going with -- and we have a number of trusted partners that we've worked with to help us with software development, but working with them to be able to get certain functions developed in the year so that we can pull things forward, but not have it require us to hire a bunch of our own people that would, of course, contribute to an ongoing run rate. So that's what we're looking at, but you should expect that we continue to stand behind the 30% to 35% conversion on incremental revenue.

Julian Mitchell

analyst
#17

Thank you. Alongside that higher software investment, there's a sort of commensurate focus increase on ARR as a key performance indicator for management, for the company, for investors to look at. Maybe help us understand sort of the scale of ARR today and what are the biggest couple of levers pulling or pushing to get that ARR share of sales are?

Blake Moret

executive
#18

Sure. So annual recurring revenue is around 5% of our total revenue today, and we've talked about getting that to 10% or higher around 2025. It's an all hands on deck process. It starts with releasing additional software that is sold as a subscription, with a growing portion of that available through the cloud in our portfolio. And that's where the bulk of our development dollars are going to, particularly in the software and control industry segment. So it's getting that new functionality and that new value for customers, first and foremost. It's also been the subject of some of our recent acquisitions. The fixed asset management software, which is off to a great start, is all annual recurring revenue. And we're expecting continued very strong double-digit growth there. So it's organic as well as inorganic. It's also about continuing to develop our sales force to have greater capabilities and capacity in selling software as a subscription, as a service, and so that's an area of focus for us. And we've talked about investments that we began last year in that area. We also announced during the earnings release, a new Chief Revenue Officer to accelerate that process. And then I'd say the third piece is the infrastructure. And working now is Chris Nardecchia, who's back to full-time focus on IT and included within that digital transformation, making sure that we have a great customer experience, makes it easy for customers to acquire the software, to be able to get started, to get the support they need and when it comes time to renew those subscriptions, to make that as effortless and frictionless as possible. There's a lot to go into those simple words, and we've got the people in place who understand how to make that happen.

Julian Mitchell

analyst
#19

Thank you. And I suppose the PTC relationship is important to a number of these initiatives. You've mentioned that you recently attended Board -- regular Board meetings and so forth at PTC. So I guess 2 parts of the question, one is just I assume the relationship is going well because you expanded that partnership about 4 months ago, but maybe flesh out any other detail on the relationship? And then secondly, the shareholders stand still expires in July, so maybe help us understand what parameters we should bear in mind, what factors we should think about when we're trying to assess how Rockwell is viewing what to do with its shareholding in PTC, up, down, the same? Just to make sure investors sort of understand what they should bear in mind on that point.

Blake Moret

executive
#20

Sure. Well, the PTC relationship is going well. And I talked before about some of the factors in increasing our recurring revenue. Of course, the PTC offering is all sold as a subscription, whether it's the ThingWorx software or the Vuforia augmented reality offering, and so that's an important contribution to that growth as well. And plus from my Board position, learning about PTC's journey as they move from perpetual sales to subscription sales in a fairly compressed period of time, there's a lot to be learned about there. And I would also say, the new leader of our software and control segment spent a couple of decades at PTC and certainly provides a great perspective as well as continuing relationships there. As we look to the future with PTC, the first priority is continuing to ensure the success of the commercial relationship. We talk about getting the return on investment from the stake that we took in PTC, and the work that we're doing there is having 3 main components: it's the resale of the software that we get in conjunction with PTC; it's the pull-through, and I'll talk in a minute about some of the aspects of that; and then it's the appreciation on the investment itself, which, I'm happy to say, is in a pretty good place today. But the first priority is to make sure that, that commercial relationship is successful, and what I'm seeing most encouragingly is the larger role that Rockwell is playing in our customers' digital transformation journeys. With the additional content that we have with PTC along with some of the other inorganic moves we've made such as the acquisition of Kalypso, we've gone from being a trusted automation supplier at a lot of these companies to really a much larger and earlier part of their digital transformation plans. And so anything that we do in the future is to make sure that we preserve and look for ways to strengthen that. But I'll say, I also like the open approach that we have taken to be able to recognize, as we talk with these customers, about the investments they've already made in other software important to their ecosystem for design as well as production and supply chain. So not forcing them or trying to force them to use everything from one supplier and to recognize that they've made a lot of investment in existing software and training and it's, in many cases, what they already have is working okay for them. In some areas, they just want to make progress in IoT or in MES or an augmented reality, but they don't want to rip things out elsewhere in their ecosystem that are working for them. That open approach is something that customers are really responding to. And by the way, it's something that PTC talks about as well as that open approach. And so I'm happy with the way it's going, and we'll continue to mutually look for ways to strengthen that relationship.

Julian Mitchell

analyst
#21

And on that broader point around sort of acquisitions and software assets in particular, every day valuations are going up, it looks like. How do you assess, whether it's talking about PTC specifically that's probably difficult, but the more general software M&A landscape as you're trying to push for more ARR, more software as a service, as a subscription, are you finding an attractive M&A funnel of scale or valuations make it very difficult right now?

Blake Moret

executive
#22

Yes. We've got a good funnel, and it's composed of a variety of potential acquisitions in the priorities that we've talked about between Information Solutions and Connected Services, process expertise and then expansion into Europe and Asia. And the best ones cover multiple of those different priorities. So that, first and foremost, is what we're considering when we get more serious and go deeper in some of these opportunities. Software acquisitions are expensive now, that's no secret. And that's why having a really strong organic effort and having a highly functional internal software development function is important because I don't think you can rely completely on inorganic. It's expensive, and it's hard to knit all those things together, right, because they all come from different code bases. Some of them are fully in the cloud, some of them are on the path to the cloud, some of them, like our general strategy is looking to be scalable and to have solutions from device to edge to cloud. And so you have to have a strong organic capability to be able to develop software on your own, which is a much more profitable way to do it as well as to be able to knit together what you do buy to go quicker from the outside.

Julian Mitchell

analyst
#23

Perfect. I think we're almost out of time. Just one quick question I just had. You mentioned, Blake, around the Rockwell's positioning in electric vehicles. My thoughts to this question is just around, how is the profitability for Rockwell in that transportation vertical of the electric activity versus the sort of traditional ICE activity? How are the margins different, I suppose?

Blake Moret

executive
#24

Yes. The automotive vertical is a profitable vertical segment for us, and that doesn't change with the increased amount of electric vehicles. A lot of what we supply into the automotive segment is in the form of products and -- as opposed to fully-engineered systems and due to the people intensity of fully-engineered systems, in general, those are a little bit less profitable. And while there's parts of what we're offering to electric vehicle, the MES software solutions and so on that have a high engineering content to them, i.e. people intensive on balance automotive even with the greater mix to EV is still just fine for us from a profitability standpoint.

Julian Mitchell

analyst
#25

Perfect. Well, I know you have a very busy schedule today, so thanks for taking the time for this chat, Blake. And also, Nick, congrats again on the news, and look forward to talking to you both soon.

Blake Moret

executive
#26

Yes. You, too. Thanks, Julian.

Nicholas Gangestad

executive
#27

Thanks a lot, Julian.

Julian Mitchell

analyst
#28

Bye.

Blake Moret

executive
#29

Bye-bye.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Rockwell Automation, Inc. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Rockwell Automation, Inc. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.