Siemens Aktiengesellschaft (SIE) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
October 31, 2024
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Operator
operatorGood afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Siemens combined Press and Analyst Conference Call. As a reminder, this call is being recorded. Before we begin, I would like to draw your attention to the safe harbor statement on Page 2 of Siemens' presentation. This conference call may include forward-looking statements. These statements are based on the company's current explanations and certain assumptions and are, therefore, subject to certain risks and uncertainties. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to the host today, Mr. Tobias Atzler, Siemens Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.
Tobias Atzler
executiveGood afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for joining us on our combined analyst and press call regarding the acquisition of Altair Engineering on short notice. The press release and the presentation were released last night. As always, you can download the files on our website. Today, our CEO, Roland Busch; our Digital Industry CEO, Cedrik Neike; and our CFO, Ralf Thomas, are on this call to review the announcement. Afterwards, we will have time for Q&A. We will answer the questions from analysts and from journalists. Please note, this call is in English only. And with that, over to you, Roland.
Roland Busch
executiveThank you, Tobias, and good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us on short notice for this call. Siemens has been on a journey for more than 15 years to create a world-leading industrial software portfolio. Today, we are very pleased to announce the acquisition of Altair Engineering, Inc., a global leader in computational science and artificial intelligence. This strategic investment marks a decisive step to strengthen our leadership in industrial software and help our customers to build the most comprehensive physics-based digital twins. The combination of our strong Siemens accelerator portfolio, with Altair's capabilities in simulation, high-performance computing, data science and artificial intelligence will create the world's most complete AI-powered design and simulation portfolio. We are fully convinced that acquiring this great company will create significant value for customers and shareholders, strengthening our position as a leading technology company. And let me highlight the key reasons before Cedrik and Ralf share the details. We add a highly complementary simulation portfolio with strengths in mechanical and electromechanical simulation and AI-based data analytics as well as high-performance computing. This enables our customers to build and leverage the potential of the most comprehensive digital twin based on a full suite physics-based simulation portfolio. This transaction reinforces our position as a leading player in the combined high-growth PLM and EDA simulation market. Their customers demand more and more holistic solutions to drive smarter decisions and compete more effectively. Altair's strong high-performance computing, data science and AI powered simulation capabilities will accelerate the broader use of democratization of simulation beyond specialists. And we will leverage our domain expertise and the immense amount of data captured in all Siemens accelerated applications with Altair's data science capabilities for scalable industrial use cases. All these market and technological opportunities underpin the compelling strategic fit and we expect to achieve significant cost and revenue synergies. Our stringent approach to capital allocation is directed towards sustainable value creation. We are confident, we can make this bold move successful based on a strong cultural fit and building on the excellent track record of our very experienced software leadership team. This acquisition is a great proof point of our investment strategy to support our leading position in combining the real and digital worlds to support our customers with their digital and sustainability transformation. Since Altair is a public listed company, you are probably already familiar with the profile. Here are some highlights. Altair has a broad customer base with more than 16,000 customers globally, providing leading-edge software and cloud solutions in 3 major areas: Simulation and Analysis Tools account for around 70% of total revenue of around USD 650 million, while solutions for data analytics and AI as well as high-performance computing has a 15% revenue share each. Since its IPO in 2017, Altair has achieved an impressive 14% annual growth rate in software revenue, of which more than 90% is recurring. Adjusted EBITDA margin is expected to be around 21% with further upside potential. And now let me hand over to Cedrik for further details.
Cedrik Neike
executiveThank you, Roland. And let me start by giving you some more color on our industrial software business that we have been building organically and inorganically, since we acquired UGS in 2007. We believe then what we actually believe today, Siemens is uniquely able to combine the real and digital world to create a sustainable industrial innovation across a wide variety of industries. It's why we have built and acquired software companies across multiple domains from mechanical to electrical to software to manufacturing that helps our customer create the most comprehensive digital twin of headsets, automobiles, airplanes, batteries or even electronics, you name it. The value of simulation and analysis is that it brings the digital life, the digital twin to life by predicting how a product behaves under real-life situations. Now speaking of simulation, let's look closer at Altair's highly complementary simulation portfolio across the full range of EDA, PLM and manufacturing process simulation. Altair's hyper work platforms offer a comprehensive suit -- suite of design, modeling and visualization tools, allowing for advanced attributes to be modeled. Core strengths are in the mechanical and actually also in the electromagnetic disciplines. Combined with Siemens core simulation capabilities in EDA, computational fluid dynamics, heat transfer and mechatronic systems, we will be able now to offer unmatched customer value. Users can simulate complex physics-based models with precision across many, many industries, including automotive, aerospace, electronics and manufacturing. The result is that customers can efficiently virtually optimize and validate products and manufacturing processes end to end. With the acquisition of Altair, we significantly expand our total addressable market in PLM and in EDA simulation now covering a broad range of disciplines. As software-defined products and the ever-growing importance of advanced electronics drive the convergence of PLM and EDA, the simulation capabilities must be seen in combination as well. Our combined simulation portfolio will allow us to uniquely serve these integrated domains, giving Siemens a competitive advantage. The combined market is highly attractive with EUR 16 billion in size and 11% of compounded annual growth. With the transaction, we reinforce our leading position in this key market, driving consolidation Furthermore, it adds around 8 percentage points of growth to our digital business revenue, which approaches EUR 8 billion on pro forma fiscal 2023 basis and expands our #1 position in industrial software. Now Altair is a frontrunner in embedding easy-to-use AI capabilities in its physics simulation software suite during all phases of product design. As you can see from this chart, simulation has until recently been the core domain of advanced experts. This is actually changing now. The combination of physics and AI simulation has a massive impact to democratize the simulation process by expanding access to design engineers and R&D generalists at scale. The benefits will be substantial, reduce time to market, faster design cycle iterations and more intense use of virtual optimization, and a business opportunity for us to provide simulation to new users driving higher growth rates. Now we see a unique opportunity to accelerate the digital transformation of our customers, enabling them to make better decisions and drive efficiencies across industries. Altair's RapidMiner brings powerful tools for machine learning and artificial intelligence to Siemens that will enable our customers to unlock new insights from their product and manufacturing data in Siemens accelerator and expands the use of data science across organizations. Building low-code applications based on our Mendix platform will leverage insights from the data and enable engineering AI models. Now looking at our 6 strategic imperatives, this acquisition is a perfect fit. We strengthened our position in a high-growth market with attractive profit pools, providing the opportunity to achieve significant margin expansion in the midterm. The portfolio is highly complementary and drive sustainability impact for our customers. We see material revenue synergies from cross-selling and from providing Altair's full access to Siemens direct and indirect sales footprint. In addition, we have identified near-term and very tangible cost synergies, for example, through the delisting of Altair, optimized go-to-market and alike. Another piece of good news is we've already done this when we integrated Mentor Graphics. Our digital industry software team led by Tony Hemmelgarn has a profound understanding and execution experience to drive synergies and to retain talent. As I previously said, we have been building the leading industrial software portfolio, since 2007 through a visionary and well-executed strategy via 4 large acquisition in more than 30 bolt-ons bolstered with our continuous organic investments. Acquiring Altair will boost our comprehensive digital twin with a full suite simulation [ and IR ] portfolio to the next level. With that, I hand over to Ralf to give you an overview of the financial implications.
Ralf Thomas
executiveThank you, Cedrik. Ladies and gentlemen, I think it's important to mention that we will execute this highly synergistic acquisition from a position of financial strength, which will be again reflected in our upcoming fourth quarter's disclosure on November 14. It underpins our stringent capital allocation, balancing investments and shareholder returns based on a very strong balance sheet. You can rest assured that we will continue to commit to our progressive dividend policy and share buyback program, providing strong cash returns to shareholders. Both share buyback and dividend policy will not be affected by the transaction. We are fully committed to maintaining our excellent financial position, recognized with our industry-leading credit ratings. The acquisition will be fully cash financed from Siemens' existing resources and its strong financing capacity from our balance sheet. Our capital structure will definitely remain clearly in the target corridor after closing the transaction, which is expected to take place in the second half of the calendar year '25, and is subject to customary closing conditions. Preemptive deleveraging is supported by significant cash proceeds from the already closed Innomotics divestment in the first quarter of fiscal '25, based on EUR 3.5 billion enterprise value. In addition, we have substantial financing potential from the sale of shares in listed entities. And of course, we will be mindful of protecting the share price of these companies as we go. Let me give you a couple of further key transaction highlights. We will acquire 100% of Altair for USD 113 per share, implying an enterprise value of approximately [ $10 billion ]. The offer price represents a premium of 19% to Altair's unaffected closing price on October 21, the last trading day prior to media reports regarding a possible transaction. This translates into transaction multiples of 14x sales based on fiscal '25 consensus revenue estimates and 31x adjusted EBITDA, including highly executable near term cost savings. Near-term cost synergies are expected to reach more than USD 150 million per annum by year 2 after closing. Revenue synergies are expected to accelerate significantly as of year 3, reaching USD 500 million midterm and growing to more than USD 1 billion long term. Our key M&A deal hurdles are fulfilled. We expect the transaction to be EPS pre-PPA accretive by year 2 post closing and substantially accretive thereafter. Furthermore, the deal is accretive to Siemens revenue growth target and performance is expected to be above Digital Industries target margin range by year 1 after closing. With that, I give it back to Tobias, and we will be happy to answer your questions.
Unknown Executive
executiveThank you, Ralf. We are now ready for Q&A. Please limit yourself to 1 question per person. We want to give as many of you as possible the opportunity to raise questions. Operator, please open the Q&A now.
Operator
operatorAt this time. Our first question comes from Alexander Virgo from Bank of America.
Alexander Virgo
analystYes. I guess the primary question and in some respects, quite a short one, would be why now? I think that the -- some of the rationale you've obviously explained. But I guess the timing is the real question given the richness of the multiple. And if I could squeeze a slight follow-up in there. Ralf, you talk about substantial financing available from potential state sales. I'm just wondering if that's a signal from the perspective of credit rating agencies or whether that's a more of a shift strategically.
Roland Busch
executiveYes, let me start with the first one. And it's obviously, the space, the software space, industrial software and simulation space is quite overseeable. And we were looking into Altair and others for a long time, but then it's all about availability. And the founder -- CEO and founder finally decided that he wants to have another destiny for his baby. And this was the point, where we got in contact and we found out that this is a perfect fit. and the rest is what you see.
Ralf Thomas
executiveYes. And with regard to your second question, Alex, I mean, first, let me just quote from Moody's, who have been issuing, viewed this morning, they said that they consider the acquisition to be strategically sound. We hope for that. And they also mentioned and I think that's remarkable that this is going to be credit positive as it further supports the reduction of cyclicity at Siemens and that AA3 rating and the stable outlook are going to remain unchanged. So from that perspective, I think we can tick that off and expect a similar reaction from the other rating agency. When it comes to have an opportunity to structure the financing of the transaction in different ways. I think this is a real privilege that we have at this point in time. And therefore, we need to ask some patience before we finally nailed that down given the fact that we expect the transaction to close in the second half of calendar '25, would be premature to throw out numbers and then regret, but we will pull all these levers without changing the strategic perspective of what we said before. We have the privilege that we can build on the proceeds of the Innomotics transaction with an enterprise value of EUR 3.5 billion, as you know. And we do have listed companies, actually, 3 of them: Siemens Healthineers, Siemens Energy and also Fluence may play a minor role in that game. We will be mindfully addressing that as we always, did when we sold shares of listed companies. And I hope you agree there was never any major noise when we did so. And this will be also the rule of the game, if we proceed. We always said that we will sell down over the course of time, the Siemens Energy shares, and we will make another step in that regard throughout the next couple of months. This is definitely not a surprise to you guys. We know that. And we always said that we are not religious about 75% shareholding in Siemens Healthineers. So give or take, 5% would be a meaningful assumption for a sell-down in that regard without prejudicing strategic opportunities on the way forward. We said we look into that thoroughly and diligently, and we will do so, as you know us.
Operator
operatorThe next question comes from Andre Kukhnin from UBS.
Andre Kukhnin
analystI really wanted to ask about the very ambitious revenue synergies target that you put out with EUR 0.5 billion in the midterm, which we incorporate is about 5 years and EUR 1 billion longer term, which I guess is closer to EUR 10 billion. Could you please talk about the key pieces behind this, whether it's kind of geographically or customer segments, where you can really introduce Altair to new customers? And I guess, secondly, on that, do they truly come on top of the underlying market growth? Or should we think about those as accelerators to what is already a healthy underlying growth in this industry. And I guess, to really drive it home, like should we think about Altair business as a kind of EUR 1 billion business in 2030 as it would have been if it just grew with the market or EUR 1.5 billion with the EUR 500 million synergies that you target?
Roland Busch
executiveSo Andre, I'll take this one. And I mean the first thing we have to understand that the portfolios are very complementary, and that's important, and this will bring important synergies and value to our customers. And as you correctly pointed out, there are significant revenue synergies of EUR 500 million midterm and EUR 1 billion on the long term. This is a lot of cross-selling. You have to understand that the revenue from Altair is mainly in the simulation business in the U.S. with more than 50% and less in Asia and Europe. We are very strong with our simulation business, which is roughly of the size also of Altair's business. We're very strong in Asia. So there is a geographical footprint, which helps us to actually cross-sell across geographies. And we're also more on the channel business than they are. And we have, of course, elements like the SaaS transition, which we've done already. So the combination of the geographical aspects, the portfolio will enable us to drive the synergies across the simulation business, but also across the complete PLM business, which we have as more and more of these simulation tools actually go into EDA, you've seen the acquisition that some of our competitors have done in our EDA competitors in simulation basically shows that there's a new market. So to your point, we want to grow faster than the market. We want to take market share, and that's the ambition of doing that. And we've proven this with prior acquisitions such as CD-adapco, that we're very capable of doing it. Now coming to the revenue synergies. That's the second aspect. That's the ones which are going to come first. We addressed elements of -- I mean, there's the classical things we're doing with delisting IT tools, tools in general, but we will also look at what else we can do. We will be very careful because there's key talent on how we're going to do the right sort of environment, but we're going to look at the complete aspect to see on where and what we would cut overall to be able to get those revenue synergies. We feel very comfortable doing it because we've done this also before when we delisted and took over Mentor Graphics. So both of them are ambitious but feasible and are very much with the ambition to take market share.
Operator
operatorThe next question comes from Alexandre Hübner from Reuters.
Alexandre Hübner
analystCan you hear me?
Ralf Thomas
executiveYes, we can.
Alexandre Hübner
analystI've got just 1. Well, 1 question on the structure of the deal. In Altair's press release, they say it's $10.6 billion for the equity value, and you have an enterprise valuation of $10 billion. Can you explain where the difference is this would assume that there is cash on their balance sheet that you would take over?
Ralf Thomas
executiveYou hit the nail Alexandre. You're very right. There's give or take, EUR 0.5 billion of cash that needs to be deducted and also a smaller portion of unvested equity awards that are going to be rolled into Siemens programs that makes the difference.
Operator
operatorNext question comes from Jeffrey Sprague from Vertical Research.
Jeffrey Sprague
analystYes. Just back on the strategic big picture here, right? You've been strategically building out the software platform for a long period of time. Obviously, a big investment here, I think the rub for investors, right, is that you've got a very high-value software business already that arguably trades at a low teens EBITDA multiple and maybe the same happens here, right? A great strategic fit, fits your strategy, but in many respects, perhaps there's risk Siemens shareholders don't get "paid for it" through valuation. So you did mention maybe selling down Healthineers 5% or 10%. But what is your tolerance really for kind of the valuation disconnect in the stock and sort of the time that you're willing to let play out to see if this manifest an evaluation improvement over time.
Ralf Thomas
executiveYes. Thanks for raising that question again and giving us an opportunity to shed a bit more light into the development of our software portfolio. I mean, in the meantime, including the current deal, we will have been spending, give or take, $23 billion in software companies and the like over the course of the last 15 years or 17 years to be accurate. And I think we have been building up a massive broad and very comprehensive software suite that is going to be even more relevant on the way forward, allowing to profitably and fast-growing development of our portfolio on the 1 hand side and at the same time, paying into the sustainability solutions that we are providing to our customers. So we are literally made for the moment, and we feel very much encouraged to capitalize on that what has been accomplished so far. We are also -- we also have been a good breeding ground, obviously, for digital business in the past. As you may remember fiscal '23, we didn't complete '24 yet. Therefore, I'm referring to '23 figures, $7.3 billion of digital business, adding the $600 million give or take and assuming double-digit growth opportunities on the way forward, this will make us one, if not the relevant player in that field on the way forward. There's a massive consolidation going on in the market, obviously, and we consider ourselves to be a spare head and front runner in shaping that market and also reaping the fruits of being the provider of relevant solutions for both automation, electrification, sustainability and digitalization for our customers. So there's a massive paradigm shift going on, and we are clearly leading in that field. We have been mentioning also time and again that we are not only investing in a really highly attractive and highly logistic company with Altair. But at the same time, we are preparing the grounds for a massive acceleration of our digitalization initiatives within the company organically, so to speak. So I need to ask you for a bit more patience, patience on November 14, we're going to share a bit more of that. But the point I'm trying to make, this is not the only cylinder we are firing on. We make sure that we are providing a comprehensive suite of portfolio opportunities to our customers, and we will be super relevant for the future development in this important field.
Roland Busch
executiveLet me add 1 more element to that. You recognized also that Altair has a certain strength and investments in AI capabilities, high-performance computing as well. So do we. AI comes off, obviously, develops its value, in particular is in access to data. So the combination of the data, which we generate from our harder portfolio sitting on the shop floor, the domain know-how we have in combination with the simulation suite, the software suite on the 1 side, and AI supported? Is it designs, engineerings, any kind of less complex products is a huge lever for our customers to drive their development of products, they are shortening the cycle time, driving productivity and manufacturing or leveraging the value of assets in using software.
Operator
operatorNext question comes from James Moore from Redburn Atlantic.
James Moore
analystI think, I'm clear on your arguments on the financial rationale. I wondered if I could go back to the asset and really what the degree of overlap is and what the split of Altair is in a bit more detail, if possible, is it possible to break down how much of Altair is EDA simulation versus PLM simulation? And can you talk a little bit about where there is some duplication in the sense that I think Siemens already has some magnetics and mechanical. It's not just purely fluid and mechatronics? Could you say how much you already have in that? And how much they already have in fluids and mechatronics on that side? And tied to this is the opportunity on the EDA simulation side. Are we saying that scaling is failing with the limits of Moore's Law and Dennard scaling and that we need to start using physical simulation that you have been using the CDAdaptco and others now for some time is increasingly going to become more important in the semiconductor world. And could you talk a bit about the vision around that side of it?
Cedrik Neike
executiveAbsolutely. I'll take this, James, this is Cedrik. So just for you, we had the overview that 75% is simulation, 15% is AI, 10% is roughly in the HPC, it's 15%, 15%, 70% depending on how you calculate it. The main customers, which [ Astra ] or -- yes, sorry for that, the Altair have is the automotive is the biggest part and defense, finance, tech and then others. So to your question, there is a geographical match between the 2. And there is in terms of which customers they are going after. They're basically matching also our opportunities. there is relatively little overlap to be very honest in the portfolio. There is some, but the way this has been approached, so they have a tool which is not a cap tool, but it's a simple tool to be able to come from the design process and do some simulation, which at the moment, we're thinking, for example, we could integrate into our cap tools to have caps, including simple simulation from the beginning. So the overlaps, I think, could be used to actually strengthening our portfolio, and we see very or relatively little sort of overlap in that direction. So the 1 point which you have is there's 3 things which are going to give us a chance to go forward. One, of course, there's the classical businesses, which tended to be very simulation heavy, which is the aerospace and auto, but more and more of those design capabilities go into everything from your headsets, smart glasses, your appliances, they include mechanical and electrical, but also a software component. And having those capabilities, as I always said, we help design most of the smart watches around with the capability we are acquiring, we are capable also, for example, if you let it fall from 20 feet on how to simulate that. Now it is complementary. We expect that we can integrate it. There will be some products, which we will have to see what we do with it, but it's relatively or actually quite small. The 1 opportunity, the EDA opportunity is big, but the current sales in EDA is relatively small. It's outside HPC. They are selling a lot HPC, which is high-performance computing. You take workloads and put them forward into the EDA space. But the big opportunity, as you were alluding to, James, is the capability as we're reaching the maximum of Moore's Law, which means that you cannot put more transistors on a chip, you start to stack the chips one over the next. And that basically means that you need to mechanically, electrically and also from an electromagnetic point of view, start simulating them. This is why our competitors in the space were so interested in simulation. So this is a nascent, very fast-growing market. There is a lot of opportunities, which we see in their portfolio, which we can integrate into ours, and we can accelerate it. To simplify it, relatively low overlap good sort of complementarity from a geographic and a product portfolio point of view and a huge opportunity to take that capability into the EDA market, which is a fast-growing market and to take this also outside the classical automotive and aerospace markets into actually a lot of consumer goods and others, which integrate more and more technology together. I hope I answered your question.
Operator
operatorNext question comes from [indiscernible] from Bloomberg News.
Unknown Analyst
analystRight now. I just have a brief question, Mr. Thomas. You previously mentioned that you will actually plan to lower stakes in Siemens Energy and in Siemens Healthineers as well. Did I understand correctly that going down for the Healthineers stake from 75% to 65% would be a good position, as you said, was the 65% correct? Just to tap on.
Ralf Thomas
executiveNo, I didn't say that. What I said is we have the privilege of choice. The choice having 1 strong pillar already in our cash box, if you will. This is proceeds from the divestment of Innomotics with an enterprise value of EUR 3.5 billion. I said that we do have actually 3 lists -- shares in 3 listed companies, which is Siemens Healthineers, Siemens Energy and another company called Fluence, which is not that material in nature from the shareholding. And of course, we have access with the best industry-leading rating to bond markets, so debt financing, and we will find the best possible solution for us. including considering the perfect -- the best possible timing because the transaction is not going to be closed now, but most likely in the second half of calendar year '25. That's why I asked you for some patience. You and the other audience. And what I said is that the magnitude of give or take 5%, Healthineers share could be an indication if and when we pull the trigger, I never said it's going to be 10%.
Unknown Analyst
analystOkay. So it was 5%. Okay.
Operator
operatorThe next question comes from William Mackie from Kepler Cheuvreux.
William Mackie
analystYes. My question sort of wrapped into 2 parts. It relates initially, when we look at the multiple acquisitions that you've made across the portfolio of Siemens existing industrial software. Why could you not develop much of the capability you see in Altair yourself? What were the impediments to going alone rather than through acquisition? And then moving on from that, when we look at the portfolio, beyond the Altair acquisition, is this then a portfolio that you would consider to be complete and fully aligned with the strategic vision for industrial software or do you see other areas, where your customers could benefit from incremental acquisition or capability within software to further broaden the value proposition that you bring to them?
Roland Busch
executiveYes. Thank you very much for that question. And just to give you a reminder, starting with UGS in 2017 -- So 17 years, 2007, 17 years ago. We are summing up now 41 acquisition in our software portfolio, which just sums up to more than EUR 20 million, EUR 22 billion, including Altair. So on your question, organic development, I mean, you can develop everything organically, but this takes time. and think about it, this company is 39 years old. So it took a long way to get there. It's -- and this is really the strength. It's not a startup, which exists since 2 years. They have 16,000 customers. They developed portfolio. We also made a check on how happy are the customers with an NPS. They're extremely happy. They are really -- so this is an established base and this is nothing you can develop or redevelop in a couple of years from now. So -- but this is also the value behind this company, a super strong, 16,000 customer base, very different areas, and a lot of experience, which goes into this physical simulation of a software, make it easy to use and so on. So that's the benefit you pay for. And of course, we do organic development in all our functionalities and our software suite, and this goes across our PLM, EDA, Mendix, Supplyframe. But this add-on is really something which is just made for us because it's really complementary on mechanical simulation or electromechanical simulation, crash tests, whatever you have. On the other side, we are very good in fluid dynamics, mechatronics or the EDA. So very clear. And we are not done with our -- with developing our digitalization portfolio. We want to do more, but we do that organically as well. We're spending more R&D money than our competitors in absolute and relative terms. And this is 1 of the reasons also is the software area, we do a lot there. But we're looking also into other areas, where we can still strengthen our portfolio also and organically. And this could be also operational software. Here, we are talking about design software could be operational software workflow. Remember, we acquired brightly a different corner. We also made an investment in the marketplace and the supply frame. It's very interesting. It's running very well. So we are looking at a broader space of what we can do to really -- ultimately build this what we call the industrial meters, which is in the design phase, in the manufacturing phase, but on the operation phase of different assets in different areas. So therefore, this is not the end, but it's a big, big, big step forward into really the consolidation of a market and creating. We say the most leading industrial software portfolio, which we have on the market. Last point, we do believe that AI currently plays the dominant role in just optimizing processes like, I mean, driving productivity and software development. They ultimately pick up of real value for AI comes when you deploy it in really creating better products, less complex products. So folding AI capabilities on top of physics-based simulation and the access to data, that's a step-up, which we are moving forward. Again, both sides. I tethered it. We did it, and we want to bring it together and speed up in that space.
Operator
operatorThe next question comes from Phil Buller from [ Berenberg ].
Philip Buller
analystOn the cost synergy side, the EUR 150 million strikes me is very high, given the 600-ish of revenue at Altair and their current margins. So I appreciate there's costs from a delisting, but I would assume that's a fraction of EUR 150 million. So what are you assuming in terms of facilities or head count on the Altair side? Or is there cost perhaps on the Siemens side that you can now go after? I guess I'm just a bit surprised by the scale. And as a quick follow-up to the answer to [ J&J's ] question, you suggested that there's very limited overlap. I would assume you are anticipating some test and challenge within the antitrust or regulatory process given the H2 2025 time line. So what are those specific items? Where there is some pockets of overlap, please?
Ralf Thomas
executiveThank you, Phil, for the question. Let me take the cost synergy part. I mean, you're absolutely right. I mean, from the delisting itself, you cannot make EUR 150 million of savings, obviously. But we do see a broad variety of action fields in that regard too early to quantify that but I would like to share with you a couple of areas. I mean, just look into the IT landscape of a company like ours. I think we are fairly comprehensive for our internal processes. We do also have, I think, a great opportunity to harmonize sales tools and alike, and we will definitely also look into the processes associated to those tools. There will be plenty of opportunities. We know that from past experience, acquiring other companies, insightful to take the time and then conclude what kind of process or a solution or tool you're going to apply Therefore, we do not jump to conclusions too early in that field, but we have quite a meaningful track record in understanding the dynamics of that, and it's going to kick in very soon after we have been closing the transaction. I'm very confident that we are going to accomplish that. There's also quite tangible aspects. And again, I won't quantify them, but you may imagine the share-based compensation for top executives is quite meaningful in companies like that. And this is going to change then, of course. And another area that is quite interesting, and we also learned from past experience in that field, looking into the real estate opportunities, consolidating sites and looking also into opportunities to best possibly also apply our own tools from Smart Infrastructure and Buildings. This is quite an area for opportunities. And there is a couple of more -- what we intend to do, and we always did that, once closing is done, we will nail that down. We will create action areas with dedicated responsibilities and accountability. We will follow-up on each and every measure, and we will keep you updated then as we follow through with the degree of implementation of the measures we have been choosing. So the time lines are deliberately chosen based on experience and on a very thorough due diligence that has been executed. So we are very confident that we can master that. That's why we also dare to look into multiple based on early synergistic potential.
Philip Buller
analystAnd on the antitrust topic.
Roland Busch
executiveOn the antitrust, I mean, we did quite a deep analysis on the overlap of the portfolios we went through all the main countries and expect between 2 and maximum 8 months to go through it. We don't envisage a major obstacle but we, of course, have to go through the processes to be very honest. The key thing on the antitrust, the 1 thing we have is also as a principle, there is a lot of those tools are extremely open tools. So for example, our Teamcenter PLM tool, which we have has more data from our competitors on our platform than anything else. So we don't close it and the main product, for example, of Altair's HyperMesh, which is basically the pre and post processing in the process of simulation. Same thing, it's very open to anyone else. So we're going through it. We don't see very much of an overlap, and this is a very open architecture, which enables anyone to be able to use that. So we've done the analysis. We'll confirm it as we go through it. But that's on the antitrust side.
Operator
operatorThe next question comes from Jonathan Mounsey from BNP Paribas.
Jonathan Mounsey
analystI guess, I think you already touched on building the portfolio, adding simulation, perhaps only the final major piece in digital industries. I don't know. If that's so, though, I mean, is this the sort of extent of the ambition for building a digital thread? Or maybe if I like to turn our sights on smart infrastructure, I would imagine you have similar ambitions to kind of own the digital thread for that division as well. Can we expect that maybe that's more, where we see M&A in the software side going forward and the DI journey to build what you've built is largely over, subject to maybe a few bolt-ons? Or is it really not possible to replicate what you've done in DI to smart infrastructure.
Roland Busch
executiveThat's a very good one. We just triggered our one technology company program where we are stepping up in the way how we are using technology within our company. We are working on -- and we made the first step already. We take technology and leverage it for the whole company. We talk about foundational technologies. These are technologies, which we developed in a couple of times also in smart infrastructure, which we can use, build the best 1 time and scale it. And areas, for example, is identity management, is it asset management. And of course, you mentioned the digital thread -- this is another area because digital twins, you see everywhere. We are working with digital twins when we build buildings when we build manufacturing sites. So -- and we are -- by the way, we are using our tools, but we are using also an ecosystem and a growing ecosystem, which we integrate in order to really make this offering as comprehensive as possible. So yes, it's the idea to leverage technology, digital technologies and AI technologies across the whole portfolio of Siemens is definitively 1 of the targets. You see that, by the way, also in mobility our engineers, they use Altair's technology to make crash tests for trains, high-speed trains. We use also our software in designing trains. This comes now together nicely. So we have already experienced Siemens Accelerator is the platform in the mobility market, where we bring together not only the way how you operate and maintain trains, but also the signal and system in an integrated manner. And again, we do that also for Smart Infrastructure. The design software is they are different. So we have a partnering there. And we talked about it. But if it comes to asset management, in workflow management, for example, in hospitals. This is a completely different area, but still the whole idea behind creating a digital thread, so we optimize it in the digital world and make it then in the real world happen and leverage the value which gets out of it, also the speed this is cutting across all areas. Sustainability, if you really want to drive a sustainability agenda, this sustainability doesn't respect silos. Is it either in the processes, not in the way how you're addressing any kind of vertical markets. So we are pulling strengths together for the sake of really optimizing value chain in energy savings, but also in recycling and the like. So you really touched the point that technology, as we see it, the data which we are using is getting more and more horizontal in the way how we address vertical markets in 2 dimensions. One is the market itself. The other 1 is design phase, production phase and operation phase, and we do that. And in that areas, of course, you have specificities, as I said, the design software in the product market is different from the construction market. But again, wherever we see a chance we would go for an acquisition or we are partnering, which is equally good.
Operator
operatorThe last question for today's call comes from Ben Uglow from -- Analytics.
Benedict Uglow
analystLook, I don't want to labor the point, but it was quite a prominent part of the press release and even the presentation. But just clarifying on the language on the listed subsidiaries and the sell-down. Ralf, are you basically saying that you will sell down in connection with transactions. So if we've done a $10 billion deal and there's a post Innomotics, a kind of $6 billion type shortfall that those gaps will be filled from time to time intermittently with sell-downs? Or are you actually trying to say something more broad, i.e., the overall Siemens finance capability will be handled via bigger sell-downs basically. I'm trying to figure out how much is just specific and how much is generic.
Ralf Thomas
executiveI mean, we have been quite specific and intend to do so. But still, you need to keep the overall picture in the back of your mind, of course, Ben, you know us for ages literally. I mean, there's always funding needs also regular use need to be renewed and so on. So it would be naive to believe this can be completely separated. But the specific intent to use the proceeds from selling shares in listed companies is clearly related to this transaction and the timing. Honestly, we will opportunistically look into matters. We will look into the time period between now. We, of course, do have a thin loan in place, so we will be able to execute it each and every moment we are not playing. Obviously, we know exactly what we do, and we will determine the exact timing and amounts from those proceeds once we get closer to knowing when the transaction is going to be closed. And we will -- that's why I tried to express with preemptive deleveraging, yes, we will put measures in place that will not get us into a backloading exercise, putting pressure on ourselves. So we will keep you posted, of course, as we become more specific on the different instruments and measures we intend to apply. And what I also wanted to make sure and I would like to use the opportunity to repeat that we will definitely protect the share price of those companies being affected and will be mindful and have been using the example of the sell-down of Siemens Energy shares. So far, I think we may say this was without any major noise and waves being created in the market. So this is what we intend to stand for.
Benedict Uglow
analystThank you, Ralf. That's understood.
Roland Busch
executiveThank you, Ben. Thanks a lot to everyone for participating today. The Communications and IR teams will be available for further questions. We are looking forward to talking to you on November 14 regarding our disclosure on Q4 and fiscal '24 results. Have a great day, and goodbye.
Operator
operatorLadies and gentlemen, this will conclude today's conference call, and you may disconnect your telephone. Thank you for joining, and have a pleasant afternoon. Thank you.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Siemens Aktiengesellschaft transcript — plus 252,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Siemens Aktiengesellschaft earnings transcripts and 252,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.